HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC June 16, 1992
" "
--~
..y....~;r~~'~"':~""'\...1
:\ ~ 1
'\ 6;
\....7
'.~-=r=:,,;3c;>.-
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular city Council Meeting-June 16, 1992
Call To Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Rezoning/Pinewood Estates
2. Approve preliminary Plat/Pinewood Estates
3. Approve Preliminary Plat/Pheasant Meadows
4. Pheasant Glen Sketch Plan
5. Special Use Permit/Mining/Park Construction
6. Sprinkling Restrictions Discussion
Staff, Committee, Commissions
(~
7. Approve Temp. Non-Intox. Liquor License/Lions Club
8. Approve Public Works Capital Equipment Budget
9. Safety Manual Amendment
10. Streets & Highways Summer Help
11. Schedule Special Meeting/City Council & Park Board
12. State Water Testing Fee Discussion
13. Approve Purchase/SCBA/Fire Dept.
Non-Discussion Items
/
14. Award Bid/92-4;Winslow Hills 2nd Addition
15. Award Bid/92-8/Trunk San. Sewer/Andover Blvd.
16. Accept Petition/Fox Meadows/92-14
17. Accept Feasibility Report/Fox Meadows/92-14
18. Accept Feasibility Report/92-9/176th Lane NW
19. Accept Feasibility Report/92-12/0ak Hollow
20. Accept Petition/92-15/Hidden Creek East 5th
21. Accept Feasibility Report/92-15/Hidden Creek East 5th
22. Accept Petition/92-16/Pheasant Glen
23. Revocation of Mining Permit/14817 Round Lake Boulevard
24. Adopt Resolution/Arbitrage Rebate Assistance
25. Adopt Resolution/Expenditure Reimbursement
26. Receive May Financial Statements
27. Adopt Res. Amending PIR Fund Budget & Authorizing Expend.
of Budgeted Amounts
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjourn
~~"-
r;\-~'
"~
L~
j-'
j
~;>~ /:fI
.....-" ".;:;:-~.~;..'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE June
- ,
.L 1.I "
-c 99?
ITEM
NO.
Approval of Minutes
BY:
Admin. ~
v. VOlk~. .
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
The City Councl is requested to approve the following minutes:
May 26, 1992
June 2, 1992
Special Meeting
Regular Meeting
/
\-
MOTION BY
',TO
,
'-- /
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
@\
"'>>
"r.~
"t...
<~
'~\
, \rJ\)
'-~ '.~~~.",..'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
June 16, 1992
ITJ~ezoning - pinewood
. Estates - R-1 & R-3
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
-&--------
David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO.. . t
D1Scusslon I em
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of the
Continental Development Corporation to rezone from R-1, Single
Family Rural and R-3, Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family
Urban the property legally described on the attached resolution.
BACKGROUND
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their May 26, 1992 meeting,
recommended approval of the rezoning request.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
/
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for
changing zoning district boundaries.
\-
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 (B) establishes the criteria for
granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall be used
for rezoning requests as well.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff recommend approval of
the rezoning requested by Continental Development
Corporation to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural and
R-3, Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family Urban. The
Council should also consult the May 26, 1992 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting minutes included in the packet materials for
details on the public hearing.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
'1 TO
~j
~J
,
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R . -92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST OF CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. TO REZONE PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AS
PINEWOOD ESTATES, LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A FROM R-1, SINGLE
FAMILY RURAL AND R-3, SINGLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO R-4, SINGLE FAMILY
URBAN.
WHEREAS, Continental Development Corporation, Inc has
requested a rezoning from R-1, Single Family Rural and R-3, Single
Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family Urban on the property
legally described on the attached Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B) and that there is no negative
effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands; there will
be no negative effects on the values of property and scenic view
in the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
request is also in compliance with Ordinance No.8, Section
5.02; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was
one person opposing said rezoning; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the rezoning requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission to rezone the property legally
described on Exhibit A from R-1, Single Family Rural and R-3,
Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family Urban.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 16th
day of June, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
-)
~J
~)
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,
TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
AND
THE EAST 220 FEET OF THE WEST 660 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 RODS OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP
32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP
32, RANGE 24, THAT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: COMMENCING AT
A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, WHICH LIES 528 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 325 FEET;
THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 132
FEET; THENCE SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE 325 FEET TO THE SOUTH
LINE THEREOF; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 132
FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT HEREIN.
AND
THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF A
DISTANCE OF 264 FEET, THENCE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 30
RODS, THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 264
FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, THENCE SOUTH ALONG WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 30 RODS TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND
THE EAST 176 FEET OF THE WEST 440 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 RODS OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP
32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. (SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.) (SUBJECT TO NSP RIGHT-OF-WAY PER FINAL DECREE 4-18-74.)
~,J
~J
,.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 26, 1992
DATE
AGENDA ITEM "
4-. Public Hearing -
Rezoning - R-l & R-3
to R-4 - pinewood
Estates - Cont. Dev.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City planner
BY:
BY:
lL
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Continental Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone
property from R-1, Single Family Rural and R-3, Single Family
Suburban to R-4, Single Family Urban. The property is generally
located north of Andover Boulevard NW and west of Hanson Boulevard
NW and is known as Santa's Tree Farm and is legally described on
the attached resolution.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for
changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning).
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for
granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall also be
considered in the determination of granting a rezoning request.
The criteria include:
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and land,
the effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area, and
the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
If the Commission chooses to deny the rezoning request, it is
imperative that the Commission indicate findings of fact in this
and all rezoning cases.
'-)
Page Two
Rezoning - pinewood Estates
Continental Development Corporation, Inc.
May 26, 1992
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the rezoning requested by Continental Development
Corporation, Inc. to rezone property from R-l, Single Family
Rural and R-3, Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family
Urban legally described on the attached resolution.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(6).
6. The Andover Planning and zoning 'Commission may recommend
denial of the rezoning requested by Continental Development
Corporation, Inc. to rezone property from R-l, Single Family
Rural and R-3, Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family
Urban legally described on the attached resolution.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal does not meet
the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(6).
C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
~~ Staff recommends option A.
\
'J
,,)
~-)
\
)
~'1
-~~Y
CITY of ANDOVER
REZONING REQUEST FORM
"
"
Property Address See attached legal description
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addi tion
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
------------------------------------~--------------------------------
Reason for Request
Platinq land for residE"nti~l 'mhnivic:inn
serviced by public utilities
Current Zoning
~- i / If} / . /(- 'f
,
Requested Zoning
~-r
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant Continental Developmpnt rnrpnr~~inn
Address
120g, Tlpy ~~rpp~
Home 'Phone
757-7568 Business Phone
~)~, t?~
Date
'/-/6-'12
same
Signature
---------------------------------------------------------------------
property Owner (Fee Owner) Santa's Tree Farm a Minnesota General Partnersr
(If different from above)
Address 3"3 ()() Ed~ a&/ fd~l " rYL'"f1/, ~L/-:S r
~~~::;;:::~~_~::~~:::~_f:;~~_~~!~_~_________
"~
~J
, \
'--j/
. - 'REZONING
PAGE 2
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
city of Andover:
"
.'
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures af1ected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Application Fee: $200.00
Recording Fee: $ 15.00
Date Paid J,L-/C" -9~
Receipt It
~4? 3/
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
:z:
o
~
cli.
:11:
I..
~~:
~t
~~. .
J"
I ,a:j
II""l
I I
....~
I I
I ~ :~
\ ~ :
~ .
:Ij ;~
I
(Z"oqj I
ff)1
r'" ~:.~ T
: .. ,. " ./ II \~
A.X~"",'N9~'161;.._?'.:.~! "0- 'ANDOVER' BL: D. W.=--
)
'....j/
(.1)
I (7)
M
Z
,
,rA""''';
M
$
~~
"",.,
, ,1 ,1~
3
M ~
4 : ~
, ~
..."
~~r,
(t.tl
5$
e;<,.y4-i ^J
'R-4-
\
, )
.4-::',i~.rp,
M
G
it)
o!170)
Il.i:.;,o""
I_.a.
~i../c..,
tf.:rra"
(e)
(.t)
I
"..~ :
""1"\..;
../.1'..':11
,
ci
::>
-l
4
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
~.
<( ,.
I
J :~
':
I- '0
oct; ,.
~ :
.0
.0
'.
>i
1-,
z:
~
'''0',:
u "
-i
,
I..
-.
~.
I'!:
! ~:
..
'.
; , ~ i
_0__,":_ _,II
(~
CITY of ANDOVER
)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
"
crry OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m" or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, May 26, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, M~ to review the rezoning request of
Continental Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone the following
legally described property from R-1, Single Family Rural and R-3,
Single Family Suburban to R-4, Single Family Urban.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27,
TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
AND
CJ
THE EAST 220 FEET OF THE WEST 660 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 RODS OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIE
32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIE
32, RANGE 24, THAT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: COMMENCING A1
A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, WHICH LIES 528 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAIL
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 325 FEET;
THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 132
FEET; THENCE SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEASl
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE 325 FEET TO THE SOUTH
LINE THEREOF; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 132
FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT HEREIN. .
AND
)
, ~J
THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF A
DISTANCE OF 264 FEET, THENCE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 30
RODS, THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 264
FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, THENCE SOUTH ALONG WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 30 RODS TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
E9
'.
Page Two
Public Hearing Announcement
Pinewood Estates Rezoning
published May 15 & 22, 1992
\,_/
AND
,-
THE EAST 176"FEET OF THE WEST 440 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 RODS OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP
32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. (SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.) (SUBJECT TO NSP RIGHT-OF-WAY PER FINAL DECREE 4-18-74.)
The area to be rezoned is generally known as Santa's Tree Farm.
All comments will be received at that time and location.
{u~/ !:to
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
Publication dates: May 15, 1992
May 22, 1992
\
\.J
"
'- --)
~
'GI
HAROLD E JOHNSON JR
14789 LINNET ST NW
ANOKA MN 55304
DAVID L & JULIE A SHOFNER
. 1'4669 LINNET NW
'- NDOVER MN 55304
.'
"
SAMUEL V & F H GUYER
1831 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
"
,
I \
DARELL 0 STERN
1653 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
ARDEN C & JANE M BEDELL
14769 LINNET NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
JOHN & PHYLLIS M TERHAAR
14619 LINNET NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
SHERRY BUSHIE
1805 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
CAROL JEAN CHRISTOPHERSON
1703 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
TIMOTHY A & JANET M ANGELL GAUGHAN LAND INC
14734 EAGLE ST NW 299 COON RAPIDS BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304 COON RAPIDS MN 55433
EUGENE H & DORIS J
_ PASCHEN
( ~4632 DRAKE NW
-ANOKA MN 55304
CHARLES J & M A HARTFIEL
14853 7TH AVE NW
ANOKA MN 55304
WILLIAM G & K M HUPP
1650 ANDOVER BLVD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
GERALD L ZAHL
1736 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
DAVID E & L M OVERBAUGH
1826 ANVDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
, "\
'--./'
GLORIA GREYHOLTZ
1806 ANDOVER BLVD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
MARK R & S L GUGISBERG
14608 DRAKE ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
ANOKA HENNEPIN SCHOOL DIST
11299 HANSON BLVD NW
COON RAPIDS MN 55433
MINNIE A HELGESON
1748 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
THOMAS & BALASKI C ENZMANN
1718 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
DANIEL K BARNES
1836 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DAVID A & DIANE A
HEFNER
14719 LINNET NW
ANOKA MN 55304
MARK D ANDERSON
14569 KILLDEER NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DANIEL J & LORIE K
FUREY
1815 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
GERALD H & G V ZELAZN,
1311 ADAMS NE
MINNEAPOLIS MN 5541:
ROBERT B & J M
ERICKSON
1549 146TH LN NW
ANOKA MN 55304
RANDY 7 DEBBIE DRYDEN
19433 URANIUM ST
ANOKA MN 55303
WALTER & ROSEMARY
LUPTUTA
15026 CROSSTOWN BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
RANDOLPH S JENNINGS
1762 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DONALD V THEISEN
1680 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
MICHAEL & TAMARA
HOLLISTER
1816 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
+;1...: 6'...+
N"""",-'.6'~
~;;~
~}I#\)
, '\ ~. ."
J v,~::~.~.,_
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
ITEM
NO.
dl.
Approve Preliminary
Plat/Pinewood Estates
#
BY: Andover Review Committee
Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to review and recommend approval
of the preliminary plat of Pinewood Estates per Ordinance 8 and
10 and all other applicable ordinances as requested by
Continental Development Corporation.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary
plat. Their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
\~
* The proposed preliminary plat is currently zoned R-1, R-3 and
R-4. Those properties not currently zoned R-4 will need to be
rezoned to R-4, Single Family Urban. In addition, portions of
the proposed plat are not within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA). This area has been proposed to be included in a
minor amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which has been
submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review.
* The proposed subdivision consists 174 single family urban
residential lots.
* The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District, LGU and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
other Comments
* The preliminary plat has been modified slightly. A cul-de-sac
has been removed (3 cul-de-sacs were acceptable to the City
Council). Two are proposed.
* Variances are requested for Block 8, Lots 23 and 27 for lot
depth. Minimum depth required is 130 feet.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,J
;J f.
g.
j .
8.03
a.
c.
g.
h.
8.04
b.
c.
'\ f.
',J
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat as
presented.
Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation
The Commission recommends accepting cash in lieu of land. The
dedication is determined in Ordinance 10, Section 9.07.
8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
a. Proposed name is pinewood Estates.
d. Scale is 1" = 100'.
g. The preliminary plat was prepared by Jeff Caine & Associates,
Land Surveyors, Inc. and the grading, drainage and erosion
control plan was prepared by Ken Gust.
8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS
b. Total acreage is 71.96.
c. The existing zoning within 300 feet of the proposed plat has
been shown.
Location of all existing telephone, gas, electric and other
underground/overhead facilities are shown on preliminary plat
per ordinance requirements.
The boundary lines within 100 feet of the plat have been
shown along with the names of the property owners.
A soil boring report has been received by the City.
DESIGN FEATURES
The proposed right-of-way as indicated is 60 feet.
The sanitary sewer, watermain, storm drains and streets will
be designed by the city's consultant.
The setbacks for each lot are shown.
The proposed method of disposing of surface water has been
shown on the grading and drainage plan.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Source of water supply is municipal water.
Sewage disposal facilities will be municipal sewer.
Flood plain management is the Coon Creek Watershed District
(see Section 9.04(b) for additional information regarding the
100 year flood elevation).
g.
, )
j .
9.02
a.
9.03
a.
m.
n.
9.04
b.
:J
9.06
e.
9.07
Street lighting is required and the installation costs will
be paid for by the developer.
The total linear road mileage for the proposed plat is 1.82
miles.
STREET PLAN
The typical section, right-of-way and grade are indicated on
the preliminary plat.
STREETS
The proposed right-of-way is shown as 60 feet which conforms
to standards by classification.
Driveway access shall be 60 feet or more from any
intersection.
Boulevard is required to be topsoil and sodded.
EASEMENTS
A drainage easement is shown to follow the 100 year flood
elevation. The proposed ponds located at the central and
southeast part of the plat will require the developer/owner
to dedicate drainage easement for the designed 100 year flood
elevation. The 100 year flood for the ponds will be analyzed
by the developer's engineer. The city's consultant will
review to ensure compliance with the city's requirements for
storm drainage.
LOTS
The developer is responsible to obtain all necessary permits
from the watershed Organization, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU
and any other agency that may be interested in the site.
PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE
Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation
Commission.
\
, )
,)
~-)
, \
'-./
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PINEWOOD ESTATES
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE
24, ANOKA COUNTY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the
Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and
reviewed the preliminary plat of pinewood Estates. There were
concerns from the public hearing on the park, park parking for Lund's
Central, the wetlands and pedestrian trails.
WHEREAS, The Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary
plat; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing, the Planning and zoning
Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the following:
1. Contingent upon the expansion of the MUSA to include this
property.
2. The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, Army Corps of Engineer, Coon Creek
Watershed District, LGU, and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the preliminary plat of Pinewood Estates
subject to the following:
1. park dedication is cash in lieu of land as recommended by the Park
and Recreation Commission as determined by Ordinance 10, Section
9.07.
2. Variances for Block 8, Lots 23 and 27 for lot depth from
Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 for R-4, Single Family Urban zoning
district.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day
of
19
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk
City Clerk
)
'J
/ '\
\_~
\
,~
9Z\
CITY of ANDOVER
"
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
"
"
Street Location of Property: Northwest corner of Andover Blvd and Hanson
Blvd
Legal Description of Property:
SAP ~ttarhed legal description
Property Owner: Santa's Tree Farm a .Minnesota GenercE'Jhone: $1.27- ;2.'15"/
Address: 3300 SL:.L" A.. j wac., d ~artnF.!rshir _
~ I E_.lA'<l/ ho._. SS:-lf-3~
Applicant:
Continental Development Corporation Phone:
757-7568
Address: 12093 Ilex Street
Description of Request: Prpl;minary plat appliration with request
for lot dppth varience on four
Lots 23, 24, 26 and 27 of Block 8
Pinewood Estates
Rezoning Request Required: YES [ xl. NO [
Explain:
See attached rezoninq request application
Fee: ~ -"'~ 7<9. 70
Date Paid: 1t-/,_~^
Receipt No.: -'#'7"'3/
~ r: ~/ ~~ '1-/6-'1;"
~:tB.'~:::t(f~ j
(Signature of Property Owner)
~(qZ-
. "
...-J
~
CITY of ANDOVER
,.
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Andover Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a
public hearing at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, Tuesday, May 26, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andove~, MN to consider the preliminary
plat of Pinewood Estates consisting of 174 single family
residential lots as being developed by Continental Development
Corporation on the property described as:
All of the East One-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section
27, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the
South 495 feet (30 rods) as measured along the East line of the
Section; and
. \
,.j
The East 176 feet of the West 440 feet, of the South 495 feet
(30 rods) as measured along the East line of the Section, of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; and
The West 264 feet of the South 495 feet (30 rods) as measured
along the East line of the Section, of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 32, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota; and
The East 220 feet of the West 660 feet of the South 30 rods of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, except that
part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section
27, Township 32, Range 24, that is described as follows, to
wit: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Southwest
Quarter of Northeast Quarter, which is 528.00 feet East of the
Southwest corner thereof; thence North and parallel to the West
line of said Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter a distance
of 325 feet; thence East and parallel to said South line a
distance of 132 feet; thence South and parallel to the West
line of said Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter a distance
of 325 feet to the South line thereof; thence West along said
South line a distance of 132 feet to the point of commencement
herein.
All opponents and proponents of said proposed preliminary plat
will be heard at the above time and location.
')
/
&~u
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
Publi~on Dates: 5-15-92
XlI 5-22-92
nhrtU~U ~ vUtlN~UN JK
14789 LINNET ST NW
I,NOKA MN 55304
DAVID L & JULIE A SHOFNER
,14669 LINNET NW
'___ANDOVER MN 55304
SAMUEL V & F H GUYER
1831 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DARELLO STERN
1653 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
TIMOTHY A & JANET ANGELL
14734 EAGLE ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
EUGENE H & DORIS J
PASCHEN
r"j4 6 3 2 DRAKE NW
\~,(NOKA MN 55304
CHARLES J & M A HARTFIEL
14853 7TH AVE NW
ANOKA MN 55304
WILLIAM G & K M HUPP
1650 ANDOVER BLVD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
GERALD L ZAHL
1736 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
DAVID E & L M OVERBAUGH
1826 ANVDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
, \
'J
GLORIA GREYHOLTZ
1806 ANDOVER BLVD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
ARDEN C & JANE M BEDELL
14769 LINNET NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
JOHN & PHYLLIS M TERHAAR
14619 LINNET NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
"
SHERRY BUSHIE
1805 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
CAROL JEAN CHRISTOPHERSON
1703 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55J04
GAUGHAN LAND INC
299 COON RAPIDS BD NW
COON RAPIDS MN 55433
MARK R & S L GUGISBERG
14608 DRAKE ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
ANOKA HENNEPIN SCHOOL DIST
11299 HANSON BLVD NW
COON RAPIDS MN 55433
MINNIE A HELGESON
1748 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
THOMAS & BALASKI C ENZMANN
1718 ANDOVER BD NW
ANOKA MN 55304
DANIEL K BARNES
1836 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
MR. GARY WEBER
ANOKA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
2022 NORTH FERRY STREET
ANOKA, MN 55303
....._-.---~l
DAVID A & DIANE A
HEFNER
14719 LINNET NW
ANOKA MN 55304
MARK D ANDERSON
14569 KILLDEER NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DANIEL J & LORIE K
FUREY
1815 ANDOVER SD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
GERALD H & G V ZELAZN'
1311 ADAMS NE
MINNEAPOLIS MN 5541:
ROBERT B & J M
ERICKSON
1549 146TH LN NW
ANOKA MN 55304
RANDY & DEBBIE DRYDEN
19433 URANIUM ST
ANOKA MN 55303
WALTER & ROSEMARY
LUPTUTA
15026 CROSSTOWN BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
RANDOLPH S JENNINGS
1762 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
DONALD V THEISEN
1680 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
MICHAEL & TAMARA
HOLLISTER
1816 ANDOVER BD NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
~
MR. JOHN BOLDUC
UNITED POWER ASSOC.
PO BOX 800
ELK RIVER, MN 55330
M~\'~r-'-' : S
,_.. c_" Ie..... j
"- '- , '-- i -.-. ~
'?-"-I~ i
) j' I ,.-.
\ c...... .'......: c..... ._.(""\.---.J
~ '-1 ""-'-'. (
~ !c~'. I~
.:.:1 \.J
-.;.~~<;....~_..-
....
---
.-
Anoka~Hennepin
Independent
School District No. 11
SCHOOL BOARD
Jon Stonecash. Chairman
Michael Sullivan, Vice Chairman
Maureen Gaalaas, Clerk.
John Peterson, Treasurer
Ronald Manning, Director
Gregory Olson. Director
Dr. Douglas Otto, Superintendenl
.'
EDUCATIONAL S'ERVICE CENTER
11299 Hanson Boulevard N.W. . Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433
(612) 422.5500
MEMO
TO: Charles S. Cook, President
continental Development Corporation
FROM: Torn Redmann, Supervisor Sites and Grounds
DATE: May 5, 1992
RE: Walkway Easement from Proposed Development Leading
onto School Property.
Dear Charles S. Cook,
(J
I have reviewed the photo copy of the preliminary plat of
your project and the location of the single proposed walkway
leading onto the Andover Elementary School property.
The location of this walkway is acceptable and I feel will
provide an easy and safe access onto school property by
walkers corning from the development.
I appreciate your foresight and consideration in this
matter. Call me if you have any other concerns or
questions; 422-5284.
4;'~
Thomas G. Redmann
.'
..)
"Every Student Will Learn"
c.c. c.try a/UI/"cEI!.
Tic:'OA
\
\J
CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
12093 lLEX STREET
COON RAPIDS. MN 55448
"
R- ECEIVED
. I MAY 22 1992
.-
May 21, 1992
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover. MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
HE: Pinewood Estates storm water drainage
,
Dear Planning Commission, Honorary Mayor and City Council:
I write you this letter to explain the storm water drainage design
and related issues for the Pinewood Estates development.
~J
As you know, every new development must restrict it's storm water
rate of runoff to that rate at "pre-development". For Pinewood
Estates. we are able to accomplish this by the construction of a
major retention pond within the plat. This pond outlets into the
natural wetland at the southeast corner of the plat. which then
drains through a culvert at the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and
Andover Boulevard. By sizing the outlet of our internal pond
appropriately, we then restrict the rate of post-development runoff
to that rate that exists today in its undeveloped state.
In the storm water design considerations, the engineers calculate
the pre-development drainage. In doing so it has been determined
that our pre-development storm water exits the property through the
natural wetland at the southeast corner. This wetland is
approximately five acres, of which about 1-1/2 acres is within the
Pinewood Plat. The remainder of the wetland area is owned by
another party, Darrel Stern, who resides on the adjoining property
(the corner of Hanson Boulevard and Andover Boulevard.).
The general ground elevation of the wetland area is 884.8 to 886+
feet above sea level. The pre-development 100 year flood elevation
is at 886 feet. This means that in our pre-development condition,
this wetland does act as a storm water retention basin.
According to Tim Kelly of the Coon Creek Watershed and Bill Hawkins.
City Attorney, we are allowed by law to continue to allow storm
water drainage into this wetland, provided we do not exceed the pre-
development 100 year flood elevation of 886 feet above sea level.
As I stated earlier, we have accomplished this with the construction
of our internal retention pond.
" )
For these reasons, I and the City of Andover do not need a storm
water easement over this wetland area.
o
Page - 1
,.~
;J
)
I understand as a matter of City policy, the City likes to have
control of and access into the storm water retention area via an
easement or another method. I, as a developer, am not required to
ob~ain such an easement when my development storm water is retained
as I described above. At the request of the City and in the spirit
of cooperation, I have approached Darrel Stern in an effort to
obtain such an easement. I offered $2,500 cash. Darrel has
communicated in no uncertain terms that he is not interested. Any
storm water easement would have to be obtained through condemnation.
.This drainage basin we are discussing is a "protected wetland" under
the jurisdiction of the Corp of Engineers. Because it is protected
by the Corp, this wetland cannot be filled or diked in any way.
Darrel Stern can own the wetland hut he cannot alter the drainage.
Additionally, the Hanson Boulevard road right of way extends into
this low area and provides an additional route for water to travel
to the outlet at the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Andover
Boulevard.
For these reasons, I do not believe there is sufficient reason to
cause expenses to myself or the City of Andover to obtain an
easement.
Call me if you have any questions, 757-7568.
Respectfully,
~r~
Charles S. Cook, President
Continental Development Corporation
Post-It'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671
To From
10.... $,"#1'0 j"J,1l
cO',/(.r>k
Cept. ~',"VC::./"PA(
* of pages .
Phone fI
Fax';
Fax';
o
Page - 2
j
I
,J
--,~,:_-"----"~-.,,,,-,,,-~,
.'
I
,
!
.
i
,:IIr~ ..,. ..~
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Departmem of Highways
Pal/I K. RUl/d. Highway Engineer
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520
o EC-f '--'IE
H/ MAY 2 j 1992 D
May 19, 1992
Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN. 55304
RE: Preliminary Plat
Pinewood Estates
,-
CITY OF ANOOVER
Dear Todd:
~J
We have reviewed the preliminary plat for Pinewood Estates to be located west of
CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd.) and North of CSAH 16 (Andover Blvd.) within the City of
Andover, and I offer the following comments:
Right-of-way depicted along CSAH 78 is acceptable as shown (75 feet from
centerline). 50 feet of right-of-way along CSAH 16 (from the existing
centerline) is acceptable, provided the future typical section of CSAH 16
is urban. If CSAH 16 is to be reconstructed as a rural section in the
future, 60 feet of right-of-way will be required.
This site is under the jurisdiction of the Coon Creek Watershed District.
Proper coordination should be made with the Watershed Officials.
Calculations must be provided to the Anoka County Highway Department
which show that the run-off rate for the development to CSAH 78 and
CSAH 16 will not exceed the pre-existing conditions.
It appears that sight distance requirements will be met at the CSAH 16/Ibis
St., CSAH 78/147th Avenue NW and the CSAH 78/148th Lane NW
intersections.refer to Mn/DOT's Design Manual for exact
sight distance requirements. Access for all lots must be made from the
city streets. Right-of-Access along CSAH 78 and CSAH 16 (excluding the
IbiS St., 147th Ave NW and 148th Lane NW intersections) should be
dedicated to Anoka County.
For your information, I have attached a copy of Anoka County's policy on
berms. Any berms built as a part of this project must be in compliance this
policy.
A permit for work within the County Right-of-Way is required and must be
obtained prior to the commencement of construction. Contact Roy
Humbert, Contracts Administrator for the Anoka County Highway
Department, for further information regardin~ the permit process. The City
of Andover should contact me when constructIOn of the new city streets is
'. )
<29 Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
,~
-2-
near completion, so that stop sign installations along CSAH 78 and CSAH 16
can be coordinated by this department.
,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
~p~
,- \
'-)
Jane Pemble
Traffic Engineer
xc: Roger Butler
xc: Skip Anderson
dmh/1ANDOVER
"
)
Q
"
)
/.
2)
3)
4)
C_)
5)
6)
7)
.)
"
"
ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
POLICY ON BERMS
MAY 1, 1987
1) Berms are permitted only where a minimum of 60 feet of
right of way exists as measured from the centerline of
the road.
A maximum of 1/2 of the berm can extend into the
right of way.
A berm can extend no more than 10 feet into the
right of way.
The maximum slope of the berm within the right of
way is 3 to 1.
No trees are permitted in the right of way.
No special or additional maintenance will be performed
by the County in regards to the upkeep of the berm.
The property owner/developer is responsible for
construction of the berm and a permit from this office
is required for that construction.
f'7:.).
'CY
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
DATE
Discussion Item
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
.3.
Approve Preliminary
Plat/Pheasant Meadows
BY: Andover Review Committee
The City Council is requested to review and recommend approving
of the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadows per Ordinance 8 and
10 and all other applicable ordinances as requested by Hokanson
Development, Inc.
The Andover review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary
plat. Their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
* The proposed preliminary plat is currently zoned R-4, Single
Family Urban. The property will not need to be rezoned. In
addition, the proposed plat is within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA).
Ic_
* The proposed subdivision consists 28 single family urban
residential lots. Sketch C is attached for the City Council to
review along with City Council meeting minutes of March 17,
1992 regarding the preference to provide same curvature in the
street alignment.
* The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower Rum
River WMO and any other agency which may be interested in the
si te) .
Other Comments
* The developer is considering leaving the existing house which
will require a variance for side and front yard setback from
the property lines of Block 1, Lot 7. The other 2 existing
buildings will be removed. If the existing home remains in
Block 1, Lot 7, the Building Department will require that it be
brought up to code.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~ ) TO
-,
SECOND BY
,~
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Commission is recommending approval of the preliminary plat.
The Commission also is recommending that significant
consideration should be given to allow the extension of Killdeer
street NW as shown on the plat. The developer to the south has
expressed the concern of street alignment between the two
parcels and has requested Killdeer street NW be shifted further
east by 20 feet. The Andover Review Committee recommends that
without a justification for the shift, it is recommended to
approve the plat as presented.
Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation
The Commission is recommending cash in lieu of land. The
dedication is determined in Ordinance 10, Section 9.07.
8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
a. Proposed name is Pheasant Meadows.
d. Scale is 1" = 100'.
g. The preliminary plat was prepared by Jeff Caine & Associates,
Land Surveyors, Inc. and the grading, drainage and erosion
control plan was prepared by Roger Nelson Engineering.
,~ '\
\J
8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS
b. Total acreage is 9.68.
c. The existing zoning within 300 feet of the proposed plat has
been shown.
f. Location of all existing telephone, gas, electric and other
underground/overhead facilities are shown on preliminary plat
per ordinance requirements.
g. The boundary lines within 100 feet of the plat have been
shown along with the names of the property owners.
j. A soil boring report has been received by the City.
8.03 DESIGN FEATURES
a. The proposed right-of-way as indicated is 60 feet.
c. The sanitary sewer, watermain, storm drains and streets will
be designed by the city's consultant.
g. The setbacks for each lot are shown.
h. The proposed method of disposing of surface water has been
shown on the grading and drainage plan.
:) 8.04 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
b. Source of water supply is municipal water.
c. Sewage disposal facilities will be municipal sewer.
"
) f. Flood plain management is the Coon Creek Watershed District
(see Section 9.04(b) for additional information regarding the
100 year flood elevation).
g.
j.
9.02
a.
9.03
a.
m.
n.
9.04
\_~ b.
9.06
e.
Street lighting is required and the installation costs will
be paid for by the developer.
The total linear road mileage for the proposed plat is 0.27
miles.
STREET PLAN
The typical section, right-of-way and grade are indicated on
the preliminary plat.
STREETS
The proposed right-of-way is shown as 60 feet which conforms
to standards by classification.
Driveway access shall be 60 feet or more from any
intersection.
Boulevard is required to be topsoil and sodded.
EASEMENTS
A drainage easement is shown to follow the 100 year flood
elevation, if there is one.
LOTS
The developer is responsible to obtain all necessary permits
from the Watershed Organization, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU
and any other agency that may be interested in the site.
9.07 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE
Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation
Commission.
. "
'-../
. )
u
, \
,--)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PHEASANT MEADOWS
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC.
LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the
Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and
reviewed the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadows; and
WHEREAS, The Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary
plat; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the following:
1. The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, Army Corps of Engineer, Coon Creek
Watershed District, LGU, and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadows
subject to the following:
1. Park dedication is cash in lieu of land as recommended by the Park
and Recreation Commission as determined by Ordinance 10, Section
9.07.
2. Variance for Block 1, Lot 7 for the sideyard and front yard setback
from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 for R-4, Single Family urban zoning
district.
3. The accessory structures are required to be removed. The existing
home must be brought to code per the Building Department
requirements.
4. That significant consideration has been given for Killdeer Street
NW and that Killdeer Street NW shall remain in its present
location as indicated on preliminary plat.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day
of
, 19
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
. ...1
F:::S ::::: .';::; ~S: 0.!.'
.
. - I'
-"'"
A-'wI ,.
....-:-_.~
- .~
.: . .. "'1"': . . .....,,~.. ~:::.~:.~ ~~.:..'-L~~ .-->.~ba:P '.:~:: ~~ 2-0. :':'. .
..::,,: ~~ -=S8(.i-~-==---'~'~'r-'i I. vtv.~"'~.
I ~ ..0<0-1 ~ ,. :,--...- ., .<'Z.c<: .ga.J 0
'- aao.O . .oo....~. l':t.. '0" 1.0 VQ.._ .
J.- . .
3"'1.'-{.O ~~~. 0 .
3 .~.....
. J. ~1h.O e.g~.l ~--,,,---
i . '. . ~JIun(
.~_;;'. c(DiJ.~.it~.J--~-:=_~-=::~_
/O;O'~~'b. 't...
0_'L ..-' __-_..
7. j~~ ;~~. ~ ____
. . --.' .' - ..-...a... ,.-...._ .
~. -jlJb.O .'Si5b.-:S. . _. . '.. . .
,..,. '..co. r _ ~~.b .- ~ .
"
. ,
.'~ .. .";" . ..
.: .~:';:'::7<'0 ..
':::~ ~ ;"..J :::0 .....
:. ~~:. ::. ;J..
1 .
(,..;...u}..l:.. ~'_.
'---. ,
I~"" lorc:1 ....-.-...~ s-
,_.- .. --.-
.....- -.-.- ....
~ (GtkO
. "..ilE
=-- ~:'-
.---_ c... __
~ =. . 'k ~Uft:.H" P
o =- !. ==-_
. -- .-. .~._-
:.,:;== @ ---
~~~=.--:- ~~.:;-o' win weA-
I. .~.. ,
----....... .~.:.-:-_.. _~~_'==.Jr".A
, ..
-- .. ,',..- ---
--.....- .... -..-.
-.. -.. .-----"
.....'.-.. ...... .'
Regula. City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 17. 1992
,._) Page 2
(Approve Prdposed ~ketch Plan - Pheasant Meadows. Continued)
Kurt Carson. Hokanson - stated they a.e looking to pu.chase both the
Hurst and Mistelskl properties. though right now they wish to begin
development on the Boeke property. If 134th does not go through to
Jay Street. they anticipate fixing up the existing home. adding a
garage. etc.. to make it fit into the area..
The Council discussed the p.oposed development and gene.al Iy preferred
an overal I development plan for the entire area rather than piecemeal.
They also preferred the curving strpet alIgnment In Sketch A .ather
than the straIght grId street development. though the alignment in
Sketch B may be the best If only the Boeke property is developed at
this time. There was also concern about developing only the Boeke
property with only one exit through the Good Value property to the
west.
(J
Mr. Carson - thought it may be possible to jog 134th to the no.th to
connect with Jay Street within the Boeke p.operty. They will continue
to work on an agreement with the Hurst and MistelskI properties.
though they would prObably stIli plat in phases.
~ The Counci I did not object to the area being developed in any
reasonable fashion. but again emphasized Its concern of trying to make
it work with all the other properties in the area. The exact layout
might be in question until the negotIatIons on the other prope.tles is
completed by Mr. Carson. though the p.efe.ence is for the curved
streets because It makes a nicer area for housing. Plus an access is
needed onto Jay Street to avoid dumping all the traffic into the Good
Value plat. They also asked Staff to review the Jay Street situation
as to whether or not It wll I remain a through street.
ROUND LAKE BLVD./BUNKER LAKE BLVD. RECONSTRUCTION/91-22 & 91-28
Discussion was fIrst on providing access to Grace Luthe.an Church
located on the southeast corne. of CSAH 9 and CSAH 16. Mr. Haas
.eviewed the four optIons prepared by Staff. In any case. the county
wII I acquire the right of way and reconstruct the service road at the
intersection with Bunker Lake Boulevard. Mr. Schrantz stated Option 1.
to construct a street from the service road to 136th Lane. is the best
solution for the county and City, though the neighborhood doesn't want
to see the street go through.
:J
Councilmember Jacobson stated the basic Issue is the county
reconstruction of the road system Is denying the church the access it
needs through no fault of the church. He didn't think the church
minds how they get that access back: however. they don't want to be
charged for anything because they had access Initially.
Pastor Steve McKinlev. Grace Lutheran Church - stated their positIon
is exactly what Councilmember Jacobson spoke.
'\
'.J
( \
\,J
, )
, .....I
"
It '\ I I
. \" ~ lllill___ -'..'!:!<!-k> AV..r:.
~ . In ~ ffllOl c> ""
.0 LJ L;J LJ
t: ~I ':: ;. Irtb
~ -"~~@I[EILd 61.:! C ~ !: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ..
.~_. b ':~,,~\ ~ tJD! i\ ~ . ':l ~
. ~\\\u J! ~
~ iF! \ Fi---'J: .--.-
;sf~ b:!'r
-:"'i m DJ i :
'" . rFl P,i: ~
""I!~' bU'...
... I: rFl OJ::r I
u.. I! ~ I " I '
't"- Fll I :r
...... :; [II b!J ~
... ': [0 oJ ~
'<t i: '.
01 .A-.~ >-
ED ~.
'" ..
'OJ :T~7~
,
-=-
\z
-
oJ "':r-
1"'\ ... -
~...
~
..
...
, lr-
~
! \r..
~
.c;. ~
..
0-
>
I-
..
~
;.
~.
'I"';
~ ~
"'S" '- .~
... ... '"
I/:. /.. ! [0
"j'" - I! rn
~'. -. ., ....:-:c
, -
. . .... ;t/
~--
.. '
. '~
~,
l:
~ ~ ~
, . 1/
.'j -
~ = si.. If"'";:;::::. Q
.. /( r~s ~ '
'l' -- ~o
. 1/ MN llS 3~OI1l.t1l\1d
.. .. .
\I = 3
a
"
.
~
*
~
"
!:!
l: I"-
%
Il _~
11 :z:
:Ii -w
.. ~ ~
'Il.~; .. CD_....
:::~!2~. ...
;; I ~~ 1.\ ... N -
'---- V" II . ..
2 h
, '
1./
. l !!j I MH 15 [HHI~ ~
= 01" .. \
~ '\ ~ J.. J - J N ..~. ..
. .MH 15 M01TVMS .
..
. " ~
:z:
II ,W
:z:
:; ct
'..J
'I =
'l'
- !2
II
.x N
I
I~ "
I' :l .
I
-
~
,r
; ~ III
-I:' "- . . . .. l..lD
I~~.
'.) . , ..' - '
'~;L-;~~ ~:
"A~, I -.:3......~ /h r
--~
!
'!I '! ~
!'
Il
.K .
.. ...-:::.() ..
. ~ iH N
;.:
z
W
~
"
,~)
I'
(~
, \
,-.J
. - .,' ~ ....
"0 .
Li\
CITY of ANDOVER
.,
-~.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
Street Location of Property:
/3"//4
loT
.:rA'I SrlZrET NY'(
I', t-a fiLl -?ELr /,,'"
"
Legal Description of Property:
/1{r-es AJ/..ht1/f
Property Owner: t?v~
/J t7 I'/~ P
A"-~ov{Jr
Q!' ,/>7 4/""; On
Phone:
Address:
...) (;Iv S"I-.
/
110 ~d.ltSOl1 ()~"~/op,.,,,~n+-, 'Tnt:. .
Q/7'1- ':.1_+'- ffreeT' tV"'"
Address: BICliYle..?J1# 5'St'34/
,
Description of Request: ~e;:,",,,t1C/"''/
/
S-;~f If' -/:.....,.:y r t'/;vf (:'-'1 ~'''' I
Appli can t:
Phone: '7 r I - J I J ~
C(
/ /,;;r q/r:Y'---<J~..1
~e". e /,,~~ ~'" r
,
7tV
Rezoning Request Required: YES [
NO [~ Explain:
S
Fee: 111.'.~
Date Paid: -7-''--92-
(Sig ture 0 p icant)
/- .
I?~~~~~ ~ff~
(Signature 0 Property Owner) :
Receipt No.: 414~:z,
?-/~O' /Y:L
(Date) ,-
'1
'J
: --.J
~ ',;
, _.J
.."..~
~\l
..__.1/
,--~J
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Andover Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a
public hearing at 7:30 P.M., or'as soon thereafter as can be
heard, Tuesday, May 26, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN to consider the preliminary
plat of Pheasant Meadows consisting of 28 single family
residential lots as being developed by Hokanson Development,
Inc. on the property described as:
Lot 6, Watt's Garden Acres located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
of Section 34, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All opponents and proponents of said proposed preliminary plat
will be heard at the above time and location.
ti~L,../ W:
Victoria Vo - City Clerk
Publication Dates: 5-15-92
5-22-92
<@
-"
PHEASANT MEADOWS
r.ood Value Homes
160 93rd Lane
'o'1.aine, MN 55434
Charles Mistelski
% Commercial Auto Parts
13576 NW Jay St.-
Andover, MN 55304
Gerry Wegner
13425 NW Jay st.
Andover, MN 55304
Clarence Wirkus
13435 NW Jay St.
Andover, MN 55304
Kurt & Sue Hurst
13440 NW Jay St.
Andover, MN 55304
Charles Mistelski
'-% Commercial Auto
13576 NW Jay St.
Andover, MN 55304
Parts
~.J
"'
'-- /
James Stanton
% Shamrock Builders
Development Inc.
3200 NW Main St.
Coon Rapids, MN 55432
-
Kottkes Bus Garage
13625 NW Jay St.
Andover, MN 55304
DECEiVE-
n JUN 1 0 1992 U
\~
June 10, 1992
Mr. James Schrantz
1685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
--
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Meadows
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
This letter is being written to document our concerns with the plat
of Pheasant Meadows, which is directly adjacent on the North side
of property that Ashford Development Corp., Inc. has purchased.
Our main concerns are as follows:
1. Aliqnment of Killdeer Street
In our preliminary design work on our property, it became
apparent that the alignment of Killdeer st. as proposed in
the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadows would not align with
Killdeer Street in our plat.
~J
Note: If one looks at the City of Andover Master Plan for
this area, the problem becomes apparent.
In order to try to solve the problem we have:
1. Raised the problem with the City Staff prior to the Planning
and Zoning Public Hearing on the Pheasant Meadows Plat.
2. Raised the issue with the Developer prior to the Public
Hearing of the Plat of Pheasant Meadows.
3. Raised formal objections at the Planning and Zoning Public
Hearing about the street alignment.
The requested change (see attached drawing) that is needed to get
the two Killdeer Streets to align,is a very minor change in the
Pheasant Meadows Plat. It will not have any effect on the lot
count or add any significant costs to the plat of Pheasant Meadows.
We respectively ask that this issue be solved prior to approval of
the Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Meadows.
If Killdeer Street is not aligned with our design, we would need
in the future at least one if not more variances in our plat or we
would loose one or two lots. We are at a complete loss as to whv
such a small chanqe has not been solved prior to a plat qettinq
this far. We gave adequate notice to everyone about this problem,
)
,J
the city of Andover Master Plan shows the need and the change has
no adverse effect on the Pheasant Meadows Plat. Again we
respectively request that this alignment issue be resolved prior
to the approval of the Plat.
2. storm Water Issue
Attached is a letter from my Engineer relating to storm water
issues. We request that these problems be solved prior to
the approval of the Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Meadows.
The City of Andover should have some master plan for sewer, water,
storm sewer and other utilities in this entire area, prior to the
approval of any plat, so that the most economical method of
installing the utilities is done. Some very significant assessment
issues could exist with regard to Jay st. All of the above could
be avoided if a master utility plan with costs and proposed
assessments would be presented to all of the property owners in the
area prior to the approval of any plats. if this is not done, then
the first plat will dictated what is done in the future, regardless
if it is the best way or most cost effective.
If any additional documents are required from us please let us
know. Also, we would request that a copy of the letter be included
in the City Council agenda material.
~J
Sincerely,
d~...-c-~.
~uJ~~
Jerry Windschitl
Carol Windschitl
~.)
)
- ../
.Iill.~~~.
222 Monroe Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
6121427-5860
Fax 6121427-3401
JUnE7-'8, 1992
~J...i.. ,
Mr. JamesE. Schrantz
city Engineer
City_of.Andover
f685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Preliminary Grading Plan - Pheasant Meadows
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
I have been asked by Mr. Jerry Windschitl to review the preliminary
grading plan for Pheasant Meadows regarding impacts to
Mr. Windschitl's property lying south of the proposed plat.
Based on our review of the preliminary grading plan, feasibility
study and a drainage assessment by the City of Coon Rapids, we have
two areas of concern.
~J
First, the grading plan shows a two to three foot berm being
constructed on the south edge of Lots 6, 7 and 8 of Block 2. This
will block the natural drainage from the south as indicated in the
City of Coon Rapid's assessment of the drainage. Therefore,
provisions must be made to accept the natural drainage south of
Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 2.
Secondly, the increased runoff from Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 following
development of the lots will flow south along Jay Street into
Mr. Windschitl's property. It is our understanding that drainage
rates following development cannot exceed predevelopment rates.
Please correct the two problems prior to approval and development
of the plat.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
sincerely,
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~~~
Peter R. Raatikka, P.E.
'i !mlc /
J cc: Jerry Windschitl
John Davidson, TKDA
File: 2054.11
E.ngineers
Landscape Architects
Surveyors
7
I .Js
""Iv
,.
,
~
/
/
/
1
I II I / )
I : III ~'-;
, III Q):
:) L_ III Q) ,
- l ~ - 14J - - LL :: : b I
1~7__---ll I ~ III (f)'
" f:, w ,I 8 ~ gllll 'I
O 1 I 5 a 'I 1 ...-_ I III;: ...........
<> '. · - 111_-",
.,':: I~ L 111= 0,
~ ------~ ~ -- -- _~J~~ -- III~J I
· -- '05 ------~ --- l III,
,0' -- -- -- - -=--_ _ _ ~ BLOq;K 11 lJi 1110 ,
u_ I, I 7 '<> 11110 I
r r-/!) ::. " I EXISTING r7} ~ 0 10 I III (I)
(//.1:..: I H~@E/ J~ III
~ ~q1 ~ L ~/ / / //~...- 11100
u' -L 0 _ _ ~~ III"'!
~ 14-~ _ _ III""""
u -- ~, 0
~- - - .""
154 --- -~___ 11110 <(
- - - - -.remo," ~ I LL I 0
- - - - - -, , ~ I . Ul III '"
~ [ V T.V; /1-"/ ~ ' 6 . g g I III 8
-" v.//../ 7~V~....lI. V~1I1 U
\ i:/_J~ ..L.;;;r'- L :: III ~
'3 !., _____ III '"
~ 143 _ _ I =>
--= ------ II . Ul
- - - - ..... u.. III Z
_'~J____ , __ Ul 1
-. 'I <> III :J
I 15 ~ gill I I
~I I 8:: III .~
I 30 L J~. .. III
I -_u . III :::..
I - 143__ ..
- - 1:'0
2
72
1 1
4
I
I
I
- -,
14.l
\ ?,\
~
~
\\)
/3!:__
13c.':::>
., .
\ ::;>.:,)C?....
\~C)
t\.
~
~
\~c.
/
\~c
I
J.!
I
I
!
'"
~
'\)
I
. " )
'-
o
\ 0'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L___
. \
" J
CITY OF ANDOVER
'.-.J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
ITEM Pheasant Glen Sketch
NO. plan
#
FOR
By:Andover Review Committee
The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan
of Pheasant Glen (Hurst property) as presented by Hokanson
Development, Inc.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows:
General Comments
* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-4 Single Family
Urban Zoning District with a minimum lot size of 11,400
square feet. Minimum width is 80 feet except corner lots are
90 feet minimum and minimum depth for all lots is 130 feet.
r-
* All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(l)
which relates to lot size requirements. The property is
located within the MUSA area. In addition, the front 100 feet
of the lot shall be buildable which is a standard the City has
been using for sewer and water lots.
'-
* The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District, LGU and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
* The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10 and
all other applicable ordinances.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
.r. TO
"-
SECOND BY
~
~
~
History
The ARC has reviewed several layouts presented by property owners
and drawings prepared by the City Staff over the last three
years. The plan submitted is very similar to a sketch plan drawn
by the Andover Review Committee. It is the Committee's
understanding that homes on both the Hurst and Boeke's property
will remain. Therefore, to avoid the homes, the street had to be
aligned to meet Ordinance requirements. Also, the developer
likes the idea of the horizontal curves of the road which will
make the subdivision appear more attractive.
Remember: This has not been studied by Staff in detail as most of
the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary plat
process.
Note: There is an existing home on the parcel. The developer
and the Building Department will be reviewing the
possibility of renovating the home to ensure that it is
brought up to code.
1
, i
1
.1
I
: I
i
.1
;
i
I
I
i
'-f.:
,r, ,J
-..-' ......' c::
u.I lLl
>
:>. ~ 8
Ol .
Ol
- Z
.~ 1" -<
..... lJ...
(.) Z 0
::J ~
LU "
(3
~
;,
()
III
+>
0 s...
- OJ
c:::
- .s...
rcl 0
..... U
+>
c::: - '+-
OJ 0 III
"0 O'l
..... 0
III - 0
OJ - O<;t
s... o (Y) .
CX)~~
>, ~
...... .11 II . .
..... II
E .c .c
rcl +>+> rcl
'+- "0 OJ OJ
0)..... c.s...
OJ .c::: ~"l:! rcl
- .....
0) c:::+>+>+>
c::: 0000
..... N r-t r-t r-t
III
<;tc:::c:::c:::
lO I..................
N'O::EEE
z
W
..J
C!l
t- c:
Z..!
<(0..
~"5
W....
CD
:E:~
0..00
$~" .'!
~~
.....
------------~~------------------------~----~--
~...t_c;_ h'T
1
l88~
.=t,;. t==~=====~=f==;;;;1~;;~==5~
~L; I~--l i I i Li--l ~r
: l: '\ ~-, ---~-;:
I; ~I----- \-\ \ \ '\ I ~ L
11: \ \ \ \ '. I'. tP'
I '\ \ \ \ \, I. :,
\ \ , , . I '
1 j \ j \~ \" '-J ~ [
1-.._____'-__)._ ;.... ",-. ~
I I " ,......,'", "
, /,', '4 ..........,__
~ I " / /' ~t
. ../ / I I '''............... ~
J j-~~-i--i ,/ / 1iW"~ "f;-=:
t- I " I 181 --..........-. P-
: i . i [ j [ i ~~~__J~ r
L ! I . I " r--r-------f r
j -r----!-----! I !: I r l::-
I Iii Ii! : ~
I. I :: : I !~-
: I I r--t-----r' ~ DO
~-r----tl I! : ~I
1 I :: : i ! f:--
: I I L-4_____L-,.' DO
l t I I I' I"
1---: ----1----1 I! : ~
I! I I I j'.'. !-. L-"
t I I, t--_4_____~-{1.
. . I I 'I : r
r-~----'---1 I, I Ii..
I :: : i : ~
: I I I, 1,,--
I I " ,I ..
I :. i i r-t-----~~. I
L-r---~----: : i ! II..,:
1: !! !: I uJ
l! . I I ,-t-----L-f ~ r
~ l " I I I f
~-: ----+--i i! : II II
I I . 'I " I f
i i !! f--I----+-r;r
--t..:.-___L~ I I, ,'I ILL
I I " ,I f R
Ii' i ' I I: r
Iii i I ~-I-----r-r.-r
.. :--r----L-, l : L--~ f L
.1 I . l \ \ L--
: \.A \.
, I \"" '---- l~ia
I I "",,,\ "'-
l "'~"'// \."..........l---T--=r---
. r/ , ,/'___-1---- '1" r
{'I i !fi f:L
. I " I . g---
I / ' m{
I ' " i J J
L L-----,L-----____~______P t
L .._-.l1_~ -"... -L-- ~.
":l ("7-01_
,i ,
I
I.
i- .
~)
~:!" '," I'h" I
":":~I
r:r:"~ ' I
f ~. - .
. . , I I
., 1::;'~ '-< · ~ llitl
., I . ~~
'<(...:;,fl.. . ;', I.
I . '\;~:', ; =:' ...~
..1 7 I'~ jl~-tl-
'" .. u__-;._..____ 7 .- to I .... I
i I to Z 'l'{J ~
... i I z.'-J
~ ---~-- !:-:----uT
'-'~:'" ~ ~ .
I
JJ ~.~. ,.. -
'l' ,.~ 'I' 'r I I i J. ~ (,,)
:~tt '~l'~' ~ / ,ice :i <~;;;' ~_"'. . ~ . C)'
:'I''r~:1 ~11'~~
__a
It /~4': T Li#<::>;'~'; ~ P'--- ~ ~, i
.. 11 . .,,~ ce - - _:i' ..:[. :: :: ':...: I .1 .J 5 g
..',' ~~:'~". I ~"':~i 1 ~ ----~~.
. ....~ ..; =f;S . ~ lII:t I . ~
i.;"::i:!::ili::::iir!!!!( i ~,~'.,: :> . . . ~~~."..~~ d: ., ffi i~ .
..........
. ^ : ~ '.:. lr. ;...J/~1;.:::L T .A' =>"
l!i:f:!; . .: I I ~ r T ,- HI.
~::.. '- "~:""~liliIIIJrlJ- ~ .-.... _._~
.c> e I' r:: . "1- ~. [jLJ.w. . ,. . ;..!il' ..111
"'- , . _ , . --:-lii.l'iU . : i+>lh;.1
.~ :,.-.-..-.:::::'11 :~~ I I ~~I' i..: '. .'
-'~... N.'-'..... I~ . I! =1" 1.:; . OJll:[I.lllm'il. .";/.
~~~'''''';. ':~~.__~ II ~I<ik ~:~
D)v..) .~~ I IUl~~~~aeb'J
\~\'.~.~ . ~ .: ~1/llrr ~/j /\\ I
. 1 '~rr ..\ noT :-\~l
, lHtII'1
;~
J :", . .
..;1;~ .~.~. ,
. Srl . '''I 1
~.:.~ . ~ ~ ..:.. . .
. . ~ ....~-:-<c .
:_~""_'-
1'~ ~ -.
'- .'-
....1-L.::_~_--.-~ -
71
/1
I ( I
}.
I
.l
-:::-. --~
I
I
i -fl
.~.
. . 5--.-----
~. .
. .. I
~.' .
'l~n
.\':Oi"'".".I. --
..,.~....
I
I
I
t-
I
I
I
I
, .1..\",(.,,1.a.
lc
~ 1
.,....
, .
-'-- .
~ .' r-
. II.
",,'m.. ~ ................/
uC ~ /
I
ill~i~ll\~t - ,..;. :
i':\:'I:\I'\II\I\I\\\\\'\"'\~ \
-'~
\.\\\\'\\\'\:':\~i\\'\:i!~t)\:
n' ...............
II~
1111
~ 1..- /II I 11Ii7i
Pheasant Glen
Location Map
u ~___J__.~:~ .~ _~Li p' \~
1 I I " ----
---,
~.
.-\
I~
I
I
i
I
i
'-r-
f-- ...... ::... .::.'
...... ....,.....
'~~ .
t,~ ~T
Pheasant Glen
Adjacent Developments
C)
CITY OF ANDOVER
'\
,J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning .~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City planner
June 16,
ITEM SUP - Mining Permit
NO. tt Park Const. Co.
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review and approve the request of
Park Construction Company for a Special Use Permit for a mining
permit on the property known as the Leroy Johnson property,
generally located north of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and east of
prairie Road NW. Please consult the attached report presented to
the Planning and zoning Commission at their June 9, 1992 meeting.
STAFF CONCERNS
Staff has the following concerns regarding the request.
1. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the property to be mined can
be served by municipal sanitary sewer (2000-2005). Staff is
requesting that the finished grading plan indicate sufficient
ground elevations to assure future urban residential development.
2. Staff is requesting a development plan be done indicating how
the property will be developed when services are available. The
development plan shall be approved by the Andover Review Committee
(ARC) .
3. Staff is requesting the applicant submit further information
on the water table to establish the ground water contour.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their June 9, 1992 meeting,
recommended the Special Use Permit for a mining permit be
approved with conditions. Please consult the attached resolution
for Council review and adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
\ TO
SECOND BY
"- ""
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
-,)
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF PARK
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR A MINING PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR MINING
ACTIVITIES ON THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED
EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Park Construction Company has requested a Special
Use Permit for a mining permit to conduct mining activities on the
property legally described on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the use
will not significantly cause serious traffic congestions or
hazards; and
\
~)
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the use
will not depreciate surrounding property and is in harmony with
the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there
were concerns regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to grant a Special Use Permit for
a mining permit to allow Park Construction Company to conduct
mining activities on said property with the following conditions:
1. Hauling of materials shall be limited to Monday
through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. and Saturdays
8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
2. Signage shall be placed on access driveways indicating
trucks hauling.
3. Applicant shall keep Bunker Lake Boulevard NW in a
state of good repair (fill clean up).
\
-~
4. watering of roadway access to site to control dust
during dry times.
5. Applicant be required to restore area when stock pi lee
fill is removed with seed or vegetation to establish
erosion control.
)
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Mining Permit
Resolution
June 16, 1992
6. Length of permit shall be in one year increments for a
maximum of five (5) years.
7. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
8. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection by City Staff.
9. The finished grading plan shall be approved by the
Andover Review Committee (ARC).
10. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain all
necessary permits from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, the Army Corps of Engineers, the
Coon Creek Watershed District and all other agencies
who have an interest in the site.
l
, ~
11. The applicant shall receive approval from Anoka county
for the forty (40') foot driveway access from Bunker
Lake Boulevard NW to the site.
12. The applicant provide more detailed information on the
water table and the ground water contour.
13. The applicant shall submit a development plan for
review and approval of the Andover Review Committee
(ARC).
14. The applicant shall provide a security bond as
established by the City Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 16th
day of June, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
\
/
.J
EXHIBIT A
(1) Unplatted Grow Township, the Northeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, Minnesota (PIN 36-32-24-11-0001);
, \
~~
(2) Unplatted Grow Township, the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, Minnesota (PIN 36-32-24-12-0001);
(3) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, lying Northerly of the
center line of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (Anoka County Road
No. 116), except that part described as follows: Commencing
at the Northeast corner of said Quarter, Quarter, thence
South 2 degrees, 39 minutes, 49 seconds West along the East
line thereof 406.54 feet to the point of beginning, thence
North 85 degrees, 12 minutes, 39 seconds West 330 feet,
thence Southerly parallel West of said East line to said
center line, thence South 85 degrees, 12 minutes, 39 seconds
East along said center line to said East line, thence
Northerly along said East line to the point of beginning;
except road easements of record (PIN 36-32-24-13-0003);
(4) That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
lying Northerly of the center line of Bunker Lake Boulevard
NW; except roads; subject to easements of record (PIN 36-32-
24-13-0003).
\
~)
,J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 9, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Special Use Permit
Mining Permit - Park
Construction Company
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by Park Construction Company for
a mining permit on a portion of the property owned by Leroy
Johnson located north of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and East of
prairie Road NW, legally described on Exhibit A of the attached
resolution.
BACKGROUND
The request for the Special Use Permit for a m~n~ng permit is to
remove 500,000 cubic yards of common and granular material from
the Johnson property to be used in the construction of State
project 0214-10 located in Blaine. Trucks leaving the site will
travel east on Bunker Lake Boulevard NW to Highway 65. The
~ estimated date of completion is August 1993.
Staff was concerned that the land after the mining activites have
occurred would be buildable. The property to be mined can be
served by sanitary sewer and water. The City's consulting
engineer, TKDA, has reviewed the finished grading plan to assure
the property can be served by gravity flow sanitary sewer. The
Andover Review Committee (ARC) has also reviewed the proposed
finished grading plan and does not forsee any problems with the
request.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24, requires a Special Use Permit when
conducting mining activities. Such permit shall include as a
condition thereof:
(A) A plan for a finished grade which will not adversely
affect surrounding land or the development of the site on
which mining is being conducted, and
(B) The route of trucks moving to and from the site.
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, regulates the Special Use Permit
process. In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria
shall be examined.
/ "
, ---./
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands.
The use would not have a detrimental effect.
,J
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Mining
Park Construction Co.
Leroy Johnson Property
June 9, 1992 P & Z Meeting
I'
2. The existing ~nd anticipated traffic conditions.
The use will create truck traffic on Bunker Lake Boulevard NW.
3. The effect on the values of the property and scenic views in
the surrounding area.
The site being mined will be required to be restored and will not
negatively affect the values and scenic views in the surrounding
area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan does not address permits in regard to
mining activities.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OPTIONS
The Planning and zoning Commission has the following options
available.
~
1. To recommend to the City Council approval of the Special Use
Permit requested by Park Construction Company for a mining
permit on the property legally described on Exhibit A of the
attached resolution.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the
use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or
general welfare of the community; the use will not cause
serious traffic conditions or hazards; the use will not
depreciate surrounding property; and the use is in harmony
with the Comprehensive plan.
Staff Recommends the Commission add the following conditions
to the permit in addition to those listed under Section 4.24
of Ordinance No.8.
1. Hauling of materials limited to Monday through Friday,
8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. and saturdays, 8:00 A.M. to 4:00
P.M.
2. Signage be placed on access driveways indicating trucks
hauling.
3. Applicant keep Bunker Lake Boulevard NW in a state of good
repair (fill cleanup).
, ,
,)
4. watering of roadway access to site to control dust during
dry times.
,j
~
~J
Page Three
Special Use Permit - Mining
Park Construction Co.
Leroy Johnson Property
June 9, 1992 P & Z Meeting
o
5. Applicant be required to restore area when stock piled
fill is removed with seed or vegetation to establish
erosion control.
6. Length of permit will be in one year increments for a
maximum of five (5) years.
7. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset clause
as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(0).
8. The Special Use Permit will be subject to review and site
inspection by City Staff.
9. The finished grade shall comply with the finished grading
plan on file with the City. The grading plan shall be
adhered to and not adversely affect the adjacent land.
10. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain all necessary
permits required by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, the Army Corps. of Engineers, the Coon Creek
Watershed District, and all other agencies who have an
interest in the site.
11. The applicant receive County approval for the forty (40')
foot driveway access from Bunker Lake Boulevard NW to the
site.
12. The applicant provide more detailed information on the
water table and the ground water contour.
2. Recommend to the City Council denial of the Special Use
Permit requested by Park Construction Company for a mining
permit on the property legally described on Exhibit A of the
attached resolution.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03.
3. Table the item pending further information from Staff.
"J
COON RAPIDS QUADRANGLE
MrNNESOT A
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHrCl
NEH MIOKA IS' QUAORANGLZ
.' ,.'
-<-"", '
?'
~.,
:=1 ,
I
.~.:.1 ',',_ 2190000 FEEi; ~. 23 w.
93015'
45015'
o
~
-=~'--
-- - ...= :..
..a~ '..--
, .
; .
, :
.~
lOti
-' .
"
.;
- -.-
"j
~~
/CA"-'--'.;Ci:..'"""",,,",-\
,/ ,~
......
f 1
. .
\ ~ :'
,... .'
, '
, ...
': -.I'
~:::;-.::.~~..
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
"
Property Address
/ Z/j .8")/1A'~)-- kg /.3/';'~/ I 4'7t'"k6P_
"
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addition c
1136-32 -.z.y-lla:?/,8~b-32-;z.~-/#oo.1
PIN /;J,,?c;-,3'Z-.27'- /.j-T7~: R'ir-,-.3Z- z.<;/-;..tjbo.z.
attach ?he complete legal)
Plat Parcel
(If metes and bounds,
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request
;7;; fe'P?C,:/t' c.:Y/c?'4/?>k;- ~//C'~ <to' Cc}$~r.-7 ..6""......./00..->.
"
Section of Ordinance Lt.z-4-
~_ I
Current zoning
*********************************************************************
Name of
Applicant ;;;/4' &~7~?;lM C~/'&"..?c../ ,~<];"/// 6--<"-?"""",,
, / .., ,
'7<9Cu g",c,-;/ .5":/ ~/~ , /-%, .6?'Y3 z.
'" ..-
-:7% -9'8:',..-:;
Date t.j- Z 3- 92-
Address
~ Business Phone
L)~<< ~ .
y
/'
*********************************************************************
Home phone
Signature
.
,
property Owner (Fee Owner) 4 ~
(If different from above) ~
Address /.2.s-l?~ R~..... RL.
Home phone ~ //~-~ Business
Signature ~~~ ~HL. Cl
# tt -
~~,
.a-/~
Phone 7.s-S--.3> 7 9~
)
Date
*********************************************************************
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
,
, /
"
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
wi thin 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property. .JLl.._ \/_
fl~__ 6. c.u..-~ ~ 1Z1- 4?(QO
-
Application Fees:
Commercial
t"Residential
Amended SUP
,..Recording Fee
~
(~
Date Paid
...--
Receipt it c?/(k;)")
Rev. 1-07-92: d' A
: ~ Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
.
, -'
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive plan.
\,
/
... ~:
,)~
CITY of ANDOVER
APPLICATION FOR LAND RECLAMATION, MINING, OR SOIL PROCESSING
Permit Fee $
Receipt Jt
Date Paid
Permit No.
_The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the
excavation, removal or grading of rock, sa~d, dirt, gravel, clay
and other like material within the City of Andover, agreeing to
do a~l work in strict compliance ,with City Ordinances and hereby
declares that all the facts and representations stated in this
application are true and correct.
Applicant iiL# ~~~'cL, c-:;:;;#V'~-/ Telephone 7'.fd:=" -7Y'"~
Address 1'9't'(> &~/5'k~;( ~~~. 637'~2.
"
Owne r of Land k-%...., F';~//{pc,; Jd/'/<x;? ~. Telephone '7.5.;7-//5(:;
/ I '
Address /2:; ..&-"4AC-.;- h7~ 3--1/ ~~- ,~ '
"
~J
The correct leqal description of the premises where:
f?~-3l-l'/- J7ccv/
PIN JtIl~-.Jz.zy-IZ"txJ/ ~he removal or excavation of. rock, sand, dirt,
/(3(.-3Z.-lY-~ gravel, clay or other like materials shall or
"f.3?--3l-WJ~adl. does occur, or
PIN it
the storage or disposition of rock, sand, dirt,
gravel, clay or other like materials shall or
does occur, or
PIN it
grading of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like materials shall or does occur.
Estimated time schedule of intermediate operations of the
removal, storage or excavation 01)/)-+" /o;qz....
,
Estimated date of completion of the above operation AI-9'I',d. /993
or ex~avation ~ho/~A ~
7,.; e-::.7 OZp...;. 0
complete list of highways, streets or other public ways within
the City upon and along which the materials excavated or removed
shall be trans'ported - ../ -/
n;//7/ic.,- kfte 6/v-/ 17-6/77 g~//v/v S/7e~f'J"/-/ 03-
,_.J
.0. __0_ ..__....__._..._________
.' '\
, )
" '\
\J
, '\
'J
- '
si te g~- C::.-:4,.:Z:--'{'
_L" .~<. 5:,\ .07,-,///74..4/
.5'.",~/y_:> ;{; 57!,~ 4' /""P'~'l.' 4='~"'--
/ ' ,
(5) items (may be on same
1.
The existing land elevations and water table elevations
based on sea level readings.
The proposed pit or excavation to be made showing the
confines or limits thereof together with the proposed
finished elevations (side slopes not to exceed 4:1)
based on sea level readings.
,
Present zoning and land use (parcel and within 350' of
affected property)..
Proposed zoning and land use (if change is desired).
Scale to the nearest .10 feet, north arrow, and existing
street names.
2.
w.
4.
5.
Surety or Security Bond, in such form and sum as set by Council
Resolution, running to the City, conditioned to pay the City the
cost and expense of:
"
Repairing any highways, streets, or other public ways
within the City made necessary. by the special burden
resulting from hauling and transporting thereon by the
applicant, the amount of such cost to be determined by
the City Council; and conditioned further to save the .
City free and harmless from any and all suits or claims
for damages resulting from the negligent excavation,
removal or storage of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like material within the City.
b. Renovating the site to an approved land use in the event
of revocation of said permit by either party.
a.
Applicant is required to furnish certificates of insurance to the
City in the amounts of at least $100,000.00 bodily injury
liability per person; $300,000.00 per person for injuries or
death arising from anyone occurrence; and $50,000.00 property
~amage liability for anyone occurrence.
Such insurance shall include a ten (10) day notice of
cancellation or non-renewal of insurance and such notice shall be
provided to the City upon its issuance.
Describe precautions to b~ t;,I..... tlJ ~VC.o;(l rre"t-ing nuisances or
hazards to public heal th am.! $O.a.f~t~.
....-.---.-.--'-....-- .-..------..----------........--.-, ...
"\
-)
"
\J
~
)"
"\
,
-,
. ~ ...
Applicant shall post at said site a
and a copy of the Resolution of the
copy of the Permit granted
Ci ty graJ:1ting~SUCh pe;.mi t..;..-
C..<:./-. ~ G~ "'"""'OP'? ~"'-?~q'''''~
. ~ v~......S ,he/' ~~....-
~ 1cant '
- . fa;,~~;J<- Cf '
Lan w er
.,.
-'~~--.'-~""..' ..: .";-----.
. - . ,
.'
\
(,j
"
. '\
(,J
"\
~~-)
.,,,,
.'
. .
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
PLANNING
Present Zoning
Proposed Zoning
Present Land Use
Proposed Land Use
Ultimate Land Use
Recommendations to Planning Commission
.'
.'
ENGINEERING
Drainage
Water table
Haul Roads
Street Load Restrictions
Bridge Crossings
,
Mining Procedures and Equipment
Dust Control
Restoration
Location of Utilities
How the Proposed Contours Relate to the Proposed Land Use,
Streets Grades, Utility Grades, etC.
Recommendations to City Council
'/'!
. 4 :.....
. ...... ........ '.- ..........
. . -
..,., -- _...._--~- -
. .. -' :,.. .....
. .' , .-'..
\
/' j
(J
\
'..-J
\..
APPROVALS
Comments & Restrictions of the Planning Commission:
Approval of Planning Commission
Chairman
Comments & Restrictions of the City Council:
Approval of the City Council
Mayor
.'. r
.'
o'
...", .
".
~~ .::.:
. _ .~.__, _.____,.___..__.w-~._._~..~.2':.:..:..;.,...."":~~.:~...::...::.~.~.
"..:.'
:of':" S'I...,:~...,.:-~;I
'\
,~
...~
CITY of ANDOVER
I'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, June 9, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit
request of Park Construction Co. for a mining permit to excavate
common and granular materials fr~m the property legally described
as follows:
(1) Unplatted Grow Township, the Northeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, Minnesota (PIN 36-32-24-11-0001);
(2) Unplatted Grow Township, the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, Minnesota (PIN 36-32-24-12-0001);
:J
(3) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, lying Northerly of the
center line of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (Anoka County Road
No. 116), except that part described as follows: Commencing
at the Northeast corner of said Quarter, Quarter, thence
South 2 degrees, 39 minutes, 49 seconds West along the East
line thereof 406.54 feet to the point of beginning, thence
North 85 degrees, 12 minutes, 39 seconds West 330 feet,
thence Southerly parallel West of said East line to said
center line, thence South 85 degrees, 12 minutes, 39 seconds
East along said center line to said East line, thence
Northerly along said East line to the point of beginning;
except road easements of record (PIN 36-32-24-13-0003);
(4) That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 36, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
lying Northerly of the center line of Bunker Lake Boulevard
NW; except roads; subject to easements of record (PIN 36-32-
24-13-0003) .
(Generally located north of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and East of
prairie Road NW, known as the Leroy Johnson property.)
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
,) iz~/~
V~ctor~a Volk, City Clerk
Publication dates: May 29, 1992
June 5, 1992
36 32 24 21 0001
Leroy A Jr & Barbara
Johnson
125 Bunker Lk Bd NW
Andover, MN 55304
'1
,_~ 32 24 13 0004
County of Anoka Parks
550 Bunker Lk Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
25 32 24 41 0001
John C & K H Mohlencamp
140 Andover Blvd NW
Andover,_MN 55304
31 32 23 22 0004
Woodland Develop Corp
830 W Main St
Anoka MN 55303
,-J
File:Pat
Miningpermitjohn
'\
, )
36 32 24 24 0003
Anoka County Admin
550 Bunker Lk Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
25 32 24 43 0002
Joseph F Novogratz
7021 Antrim Rd
Edina, MN 55439
25 32 24 34 0010
Ed & Marilyn M Gritton
9742 Quincy st
Blaine, MN 55434
30 32 23 33 0001
Charles Etal Vilina
2060 Long Lk Rd
New Brighton, MN 55112
36 32 24 13 0002
Stephen A Johnson
225 Bunker Lk Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
25 32 24 44 0002
Mark R Smith
9649 Holly Cir NW
Andover, MN 55304
25 32 24 34 0003
Thomas & Susan Chouinard
'14123 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
JUN 04 '92 14:06 S, C & B, P.A.
P.1/3
i
{,
i
j
I
XON-Utl L. ~Nl:I.UNO
JOSl!:Pll J. CmlISTENSr:N
TllOloUS ..I.. B:a:r.....'n'
SNEllING, GHRISTENSEN & BRIANT, P. A.
ATTOR~EYS .AT WoW'
:lUIT~ 400
::>l01 VER:NON AVE~U1:: SOUTH
MlliNEAroLIS, Mtm.'1:S0n 55436
OP COlnlSEI.
WAttU C. Oo-SUJl'SON
'\
\,J
"
1l.~~Tl'.I..\.1;.li;
DAWY l(. PA1lS0~S
THOMAS E. WOI:?P
TELEPHON1: {f.ll.2: "21-8851:\
"
;
FAOSl},UU (6121 921-M21
June 4, 1992
VIA FACSIMILE AND
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Mr. David L. Carlberg
Planner
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
)
F
::J
RE: Park Construction Company/Soil Mining permit
Dear Mr. carlberg:
Our offices represent Mr. Joseph F. Novogratz who is the
owner of approximately 29 acres located immediately to the north
of the area which is the subject of the mining permit application
submitted by Park Construction Company. Mr. Novogratz's property
is identified by property identification number 25-32-24-43-0002.
Notice of the public hearing on Park Construction Company's
application for the soil mining permit was provided to Mr.
Novogratz since his property is located within 350 feet of the
site which is the subject of the soil mining proposal.
We are writing this letter with the intent that it be
included as part of the public record of the city deliberation in
responding to the soil mining application. In this regard, we
would appreciate it if you would distribute a copy of this letter
to each of the members of the city'S Planning Commission and the
City Council.
Mr. Novogratz hopes to eventually develop his property for
single family residential uses in accordance with the existing
zoning and comprehensive guide plan designation of his site and
the surrounding areas. We understand that the Johnson property
which is the subject of the soil mining application is also zoned
and guided for single family residential uses. We have no
opposition to Park Construction Company's soil mining application
provided that the city attach appropriate conditions to the
approval of the application to address our concerns, as follows:
1.
We understand that the purpose of the proposed permit
is in conjunction with road construction activities
involving the Highway 10 and Highway 610 projects and
.:J
JUN 04 '92 14:07 5, C & B, P.A.
P.2/3
Mr. David L. carlberg
June 4, 1992
Page 2
,-.J
(~ '1
\...J
that the need to mine soils from the subject site will
run from approximately Jun~. 1992 until August 1993.
Accordingly, the time limit for which th.e permit is
granted should be strictly limited to serve this need.
We are opposed to the grant of the permit for a longer
period (i.e. two years, five years, etc.) with annual
reviews and think it far more appropriate that the
original term of the permit be sufficient for the need
stated (i.e. late 1993). The applicant would then need
to re-apply for an extension of the permit under the
procedures detailed in Section 5.03 of the city
ordinance and adjoining property owners would be given
notice of such re~application and the right to
participate in the public hearing process.
We understand that the applicant intends to remove
500,000 cubic yards of material from the site which
will be used in conjunction with the above-referenced
highway projects. The scope of the operation during
the existence of the permit should be limited to this
intent, including the volume of soil to be mined.
Appropriate conditions should also be attached to the
permit to mitigate the effects of the ongoing soil
mining operation on adjoining property owners and
adjoining wetlands by avoiding or minimizing erosion,
dust and other environmental effects. In no event
should the applicant be permitted to intensify the
currently proposed operation without being required to
re-apply through the public process as detailed in
Section 5.03 of the city'S ordinance.
3. We are aware that the city is concerned that the
elevations in the final grading plans be appropriate
for later extension of municipal sewer and water
facilities into the property and we share the city'S
concern in this regard. We also urge the city to take
care that appropriate conditions are attached to the
proposal to assure that the site, after the mining
operation, is restored with aesthetically pleasing
contours, top soil and vegetation consistent with the
intent that the site later be used for single family
residential purposes. The agreement of the applicant
to restore the site should be supported by an
appropriate agreement between the applicant and the
city obligating tne applicant to restore the site and
providing the city with enforceable financial
guaranties, such as a letter of credit, to assure
performance.
2.
<J
We do not intend to appear at the planning commission's
June 9, 1992 public hearing. However, we would appreciate being
'J
:.J
.~
JUN 04 '92 14:07 S, C & B, P.A.
P.3/3
Mr. David L. Carlberg
June 4, 1992
Page 3
provided with a copy of the Minutes of that meeting as soon as
they are available. We are \'aware that there are tight time
considerations at issue and that an attempt will be made to have
this matter heard by the city council on June 16, 1992 if it is
not delayed by the planning commission on June 9th. While we
understand the applicant's desire to obtain the permit in the
most expeditious manner possible, these considera~ions should not
outweigh the paramount interests of the city in assuring that the
.. interests of the city, its residents and other neighboring
property owners are protected through adequa te, binding,
enforceable and properly documentfid conditions.
I
Thank you for your consideration of the foregoing remarks.
Very truly yours,
JJC/bc
cc Joseph Novogratz
AA-~"".
~~~.:'..'....
',:
/ ~
i,
II
J '''.. il
.~ ...<;
'. '"",,,.,..c./
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Discussion Item
Admin.
~n;R
BY:
V
ITEM Sprinkling Restrictions
NO. ~.
BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to discuss the new sprinkling
restrictions that we have imposed starting June 3, 1992 and
approve the attached resolution.
Attached is the old restriction along with the new restriction.
The Public Works Director has issued a restriction on use of
water per Ordinance No. 55, Section 7. The penalties are under
Ordinance 55G where it states a violation of any ordinance is a
misdemeanor.
\
'--
We can produce up to 900 gallons of water/minute on the east
system. The average home sprinkler will use from 8 to 15
gallons/minute.
We have about 200 new homes this year - at 10 gallons/minute,
they will use 2,000 gallons/minute which is more than we can
produce.
Also, I have included Blaine's and Anoka's restrictions.
I have included a letter that expresses an Andover citizens view
on the subject.
Managing our water resources is becoming more important as the
DNR is concerned that they over estimated the amount of water
available in the water boring formations. The DNR is requiring
permits for all wells including irrigation wells.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
---
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~J
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
following:
to adopt the
A RESOLUTION IMPOSING WATERING RESTRICTIONS.
WHEREAS, the Andover City Council has adopted Ordinance
No. 55, as amended, which provides for restrictions on water use
in the City of Andover.
WHEREAS, certain restrictions may be imposed by the Andover
City Council, City Administrator or Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, due to dry conditions and high demands on the
municipal water supply system, and based upon advice from the
Department of Public Works that restrictions are necessary to
protect the public safety and insure that adequate supplies of
water will be available in the event of fire.
u
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Andover City
Council that the restrictions allowed by Section 7 of Ordinance
No. 55 limit watering to odd numbered days for properties having
odd-numbered addresses and limit watering to even-numbered days
for properties having even-numbered addresses, and further limit
all watering between the hours of 3:00 PM and 9:00 PM are hereby
ordered. The effective dates are from May 1, until September 1
annually, or until further order of the City Council.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and
adopted by the City Council at a
day of
Meeting this
19
with Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor.
Victoria volk - City Clerk
,
-)
\
'J
; \
'J
. ')
'-./
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
WATER RESTRICTION NOTICE
Effective Thursday, May 7, 1992 until Tuesday, September 1, 1992
the City of Andover will have in effect a watering restriction.
Residents whose address ends in an even number may water their
lawns and gardens on even number days and residents whose address
ends in an odd number may water their lawns and gardens on odd
number days.
,.J
, \
'--.-J
\
- ../
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
URGENT NOTICE
LAWN SPRINKLING BAN CHANGE
Due to the rapid growth in Andover we must make a change in our
lawn sprinkling restriction. We want to see everyone receive
their fair share of water and we have to maintain fire protection
as well.
Beginning immediately, Wednesday, June 3, 1992, the new
restrictions are as follows:
1. There will be no watering in the City, (on the City Water
System), odd or even, between the hours of 3:00 PM and 9:00
PM.
2. The odd - even rule applies to all other hours. All property
with addresses that end with an odd number may be sprinkled on
odd numbered days. Property with addresses that end with an
even number may be sprinkled on even numbered days.
3. New sod, seed, and/or landscaping is exempt for two weeks
after installation.
This new water restriction notice will be enforced very strongly.
You will be given a warning notice for the first violation and
put on a list of first warning violators. The second time you
are caught violating the water restriction you will be fined and
every time after that.
please follow this water restriction carefully. Water your lawn
wisely. We want to be able to serve everyone equally. Your
cooperation will be very much appreciated..
Andover Water Department
\
,~)
II
\
J
II
II ')
I;,
,
--....
l'osl.lr' brallu la>lll UP'"
r~. '
.~ -
....
-
City ~
... . '.,:: r:! . <J1'(..t\
City Han
Anoka. Minnesota 55303
2015 Flnt Avenue
(612) 421.6630
RESOLUTION NO. 90-~
RESOLUTION IMPOSING WATERING RESTRICTIONS
WHEREAS, the AnOR~ city Council has adopted Ordinance
,1989 814 which provides for restrictions on lawn and garden
sprinkling, including the usa of irrigation systems and the
watering of trees and shrubs using city supplied water, but
not including hand watering, either with a hose or with a
container, in the city of Anokar
WHEREAS, certain restrictions may be imposed by Resol\r
tion of the Anoka City council, and
WHEREAS, duo to dry conditions and high demands on the
municipal water supply system, and based upon advice from the
Department of Public Works and the Water Superintsndant that
restrictions on lawn and garden sprinkling are necessary to
protect the public safety and insure that adequate supplies
of water will be available in the event of fire.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED the the Anoka City
Council that the restrictions allowed by section 35-41(a)
which limits watering, except for hand watering, to odd-
numbered days for properties having odd-numbered mailing
addre~ses and limits wat~ring, except for hand watering, to
even-numbered days for properties having even-numbered mail-
ing addresses, and Section 35-~2(a) which further limits all
watering, except hand watering, between the hours of 12:00
Noon and 10:00 p.m., of the Anoka City Code are hereby
ordered, effective June 1, 1990, and said restriction shall
continue until August 31, 1990, or until further order of the
City Council.
Adopted this 5th day of March, 1990.
ATTEST;
stephen M. Halsey, Mayor
Mark Na.gel, city Managor
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNlTY EMPLOYER
HI 39\;,d
\;I>lOtl\f .:JO All::>
LZEI>rl.I>
9r :80 2:5/1'0/913
06/04/92 08:15 ~~~4:27
....,\.'1li'\I. "''''P!;~ . . ""...t,!::1'
. i.\:'..:' "i,f"~: ,,...., j7 \.. .:~ ._.:
. . ,
t:',.,
,J
';', .
.. '
.... .
..
1S~
WARNING
. '. ; '., .'
. City of Anoka Water Dept. '
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone (612) .$21.66:111
,121-:mO:1
V1r1tion of the r,a.wn Sprinkling
Sc\...,ju le after the 1st warning
wlll have thair water supply
turn~d oEf at thfJ blvd. There
wLll be a turn on fee of $2S.nn
during working hours Clnd $45_00'
afte.: normnl working hours. Normal
working hours are 7:00 a.m.. to
3:30 p.m. .
Should you have any questions
Please call one of the above
:phone nwnbers.
Thank You for ycur Cooperati.
JOhil N. NorCJr~n
Water Superintend~nt
ADDRESS
rIME
'" \
'--~
(OVER)
,; ,
.',
I
I .
I '.
;
.1
CITY OF IItO<A '\,.
:"~ ,
PAGE ~:.!
':'l ~. "
II
,I
I
!
I.
I
. . ,
.:'. .
.;.....~. .'
". ";'j
..
.~
'\1st WARNING
\", ::~ ~\~\ ,~: .;;',";.', ~:- . .' ." ';. ,
';'City'~f 'Anoku Water Depl~
Anoka, MN 55303
II
I'
.I
ii
,\
II
I-
:1
:1
:1
I'
I
:1
il
'I
II
!I
I'
il
I'
Ii
,I
~ I
;1
I,
II
'j
'\
'1
I
I
iI
:i
~ I
,\
.(
'I
~ I
I
:1
Ii
11
.1
:1
Phone (612) -I21-1i6:1O
,121-:!!I0:1
The Superintendent would like to
:i nfonn you that Anol(a has an "Odd &
Even" Lawn Sprinkling Restriction
from June 1st thru Aug. 31st each
year.
However, due to one or
illore of the following reasons:
Unseasonably Dry Conditions
Onngerously Low Water
Reserve for Fire Protection
Pump or Well Failure
Unable to keep up with the
demand from the sy!;tem
Other
The Water Oept. has in~tituted
.n "Total Lawn Sprinkling Ban"
effp.(""~ve i.mmediately from:.'
.d
AM to
until further notice
PM
inq.othp..: hours the
"(), & Even Sp'rinklinq Restriction
is in Gffect.
This ban alsO inCludes NEW LAWNS.
I
.1
1
""
(OVER)
"
.'.'. '..~
I
'I
"J
JUI~-02-1992 11: 19 FROM CITY/BLAINE PUBLIC WORKS
TO
7558923 P.01
, "
~ .
.
\
..
Fax'
___'_ ._____. ._0"
')
',J
,_J
CITY OF BLAINE
9150 central Ave. N.E.
Blaine, MN 55434
April 24, 1992
TOI
Blaine Banner
Blaine-spring Lake Park Life
Circulatinq Pines
Minneapolis star , Tribune
Praes publications
St. Paul plspatch
l'CANO Radio
KSTP AM Raaig
IOtLV Radio
WCCO AM Radio
WLI<X Radio
SUBJECT:
City of'Blaine
Lawn Sprinkler Restrictions
AUTHORIZED BY:
QJ/2
Donald G. Poss, City Manaqer
Lawn sprinkling restrictions in the City of Blaine are in
effect from May 1st through September 1st annually. There
is a total watering ban from 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. every
day. The Odd-even rule applies other hours. All property
with addresses that end with an odd number may be sprin-
kled on odd numbered days. Property with addresses that
end with an even number may be sprinkled on even number
days.
New sod, seed and/or landscaping is exempt for two weeK5
after installation.
Ii ,
TOTAL P.01
~J
~/519;J--.,
: \:5/0: ~k t17j?)~
i ~:. ~tJtiZff6o/
!
: ~~.A:tiv~,~~~~
(LA I ~ ~ ~ B:3:(JC)~~
~ 9. /it,,~ ~~ ~
~ tK 7'%1Afq 'tr3:ao/~
. C;:~;/1YZ ~s:c:;-cp~ 0Cdl ~ .
. ~~~~o/;;() ~ ~
cu~~ Ad~
~ c;d -9 d 3/CJdft~~ ~
rrr~ .'. ! ~ d ~/V'{)/~
:<m- ii / ~ (! t:b0-Y.Jr1...ef2 ..
cJkI;~tUf2 '1' ~~ ~
:;~ (Zj ~~~d~
tu~~ ~~;I~)J
~tA--~'"8!2~ 1ir-~e! <7 .
. -~~~
f25,~ ~ (JUdd ' .. ~ /J
kn au/v) ~1dp-~c;f~ -aU
,)
o
@\--
~. ''-'~~.'..
1~1
~~
'I
~) '~,~~:iP
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
June 16,
:1.992
ITEM
NO.
Approve Non-Int. Liq.
Lie/Lions Club
Admin.
V. Volk ~b,
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
staff, Comm.,Commissio s
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve a non-intoxicating
liquor license for the Lions Club to be used on August 16, 1992.
The fee for the license has been paid and their insurance has
been received.
,~)
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,. ) TO
'-I
SECOND BY
.
"i
(3itI.f 01 ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
'-/1
COMBINATION APPLICATION FOR RETAILERS <ON-SALE) (OFF-SALE) NON.INTOXlCATlNG MALT LIQUOR
LICENSE; TAVERN LICENSE: BOTl'LE CLUB LICENSE; PUBLIC DRINKING PLACE LICENSE: COMBINA~
TlON LICENSE. .
To ~or An,vACoiJt. of Anoka
I. .jC~~..1.G~.gftH~"J 01 the City ot .AtJ/..cIo...J./.~,............,...............,.............
County ot ...A.tV.tl..llk...,................................,..,..,.....,................. herelly make appllcatlon tor the tollowlng lleense(s):
(Off-Salel (On,Sa!e) (Tavern) <Bottle Club) (Publlc Drinking Place) (Comblnatlon), establlshed pursuant to an
Ordinance passed by the Andove, City Council. ..! A. ~A{ k;z,(
For the past five years my residence has been as lo11ows: .....at.7~....I.~7!......................n...................l....................
~..~~~..::..:...~.:::..;:i,::;:::;.;.:;:::..;;.i....:::::::......:......,'..::,..~~..:::::~:~:Ii~~""1..""i.?~;;.::::::~;;2::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::.::
month day year' City. VUl.,. or Town
.....................A.;dt.&t...............",.....,............,...,.............",...,...,.
State
I am the proprietor ot .".".......".A!d......"......,....".....".......,......................,........,....,.........,..............................................,.... located
at the tollowlng address ......,......,................................,......."......,..,.......'.'".................."...............................:.................,...............,. The
firm was Incorporated ..................................,...........,................................ ......,.....,.........'............. The names and address ot the
date
owners are as tollow: .J- ~
~.aii' (f(L....i2~....).........~.....A.~.. .u.s,.f. ./~....,.J..CZ..22.........4.......;~~....{?.J/'f'I{
CL .... ......./19..11./(...02,.. . ..fZY"'-;J.. ? y.....,...../?!.!,t3...t.......0:A.J/.&..r<.,.r....,....,...
,A.. .......jtf..ff.~7Cf{QStJ.. ..~..~/.Y:......(J 1 v.:..J....d~IY::.......4-:z/...ci&~.JL. A(...c.!.C;y,..;
so./d.....:.c::-~p.r..,...E~...,;.../d,.4cJ j?A:1...,.....Tc2.....,..".,~t2..e... f:::!::J..J......c ~
:1....~.~:/{..,.,tld.Q~::~::~:::~~iL(;:::::::~:::~=::~~:~~:::~::~::::.:..:::.:~::~::=::::.::::: 6S
I agree. as part of this applIcation, to furnish a list ot all otherpersons, finns, or corporations having an Interest
In the licensed business. I will notlty the City of Andover 01 any change In legal ownership or beneficial Interest In
such business.
o.
I am ................................ engaged In the retail sale ot Intoxlcatlng liquor.
I have .!II~........,.., had an application tor lIc:enses rejected previously.
I have .~..t.............. been convicted of a felony nor of Violating any National or state liquor law or local
or'dlnance relating to the manufacture, sale or transportation, or possession for sale or transportation of Intoxi-
cating llquor.
Gambling or gambling devices will not be permitted on the licensed premises.
I have no Intention or agreement to transfer this llcense to another person.
I submit the 10110wtng names of three persons, IncludlnR a bank, tor reference, with whom I have had business
relations.
~~J
I have read the appllcable ordinance. and. have become tamlllar with their content. I wUI comply strictly with all
of their provisions. '
I do not own or have a direct or Indirect Interest In any other llcensed establishment provided tor 'n the ordinances.
I agree to walvp my constltutlonal rights altalnst search and seizure and will treely permit peace officers to Inspect
my premises and altree to the tortelture ot my license It tound to have violated the proVisions ot the ordinance
providing tor t"~ grantln<< C)t thl. Ucenae. ~
I hereby solemnly swear that the tore~:..n~ ~tatements a~.~d &~st O~I~.~~:.........,. ....
APPlleant'~~
Subscribed and awom- to betore
mp th's ................................... day ot
.................................................., 19.........:
@\. ~'t''1\.
'-:\
iJ
4!
~ \ '~.l
,J ,~<,_~:.::",
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works ~
Frank stone f0J/
BY:
ITEM
NO.
Approve Public works
Capital Equipment Budge
The City Council is requested to approve requests for bids on the
following list of capital equipment.
5. Toro
$85,000.00
$32,000.00
$16,000.00
$14,000.00
$13,000.00
$ 3,500.00
1. Tandem Trailer, Plow Wing & Sander
2. Hot Box for patching Streets
3. Bobcat
4. Four Wheel Drive Pickup & Plow
6. Tandem Trailer {Parks}
,
\'-
Total
Tax
$163,500.00
$ 10,627.50
TOTAL
$174,127.50
Mr. Koolick stated that we could issue $175,000.00 in equipment
certificates. A copy of his March memorandum is attached.
Items of equipment moved to 1993 Capital Budget are a new
grader at a cost of $145,000.00 and a tractor with rear and side
mower and front broom at a cost of $30,000.00.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
\ ) TO
'-I
SECOND BY
~
()
()
\J
(J
~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Frank Stone
Jim Schrantz
Howard D. Koolick
March 2, 1992
REFERENCE: 1992 Capital Equipment Purchases
At a City Council meeting in November of 1991, the City
Council discussed your request for capital equipment
and requested a reduced list where the tax levy for 1993
would not exceed $45,000. Based on current interest
rates (the calculations use rates of 4.2% to 4.7%), I believe
the City could issue $L75~OO of equipment certificates.
This amount includes approximately $2,200 of issuance costs.
This amount was calculated as follows:
Principal Interest Total Levy
1993 $ 35,000 $ 7,840 $ 42,840 ~44,982
1994 35,000 6,370 41,370 43,439
1995 35,000 4,830 39,830 41,821
1996 35,000 3,255 37,255 39,118
1997 35,000 1,645 36,645 38,477
$ 175,000 $ 23,940 $ 197,940 $207,837
The levy is calculated at 105% of the total debt payment as
required by state law.
Please note that should interest rates increase or decrease
sharply, the amount of certificates which could be issued
would change.
@\"'
~..,c.,~\..
-t\
}-'!.
i!
.Jl
.' ~ .il
" J ,~ ~/
~ --.;:.."..,...'.......-:..
......-......-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
DATE
ITEM Safety Manual
NO. Amendment
BY:
Frank Stone
@
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
The City Council is requested to approve changes to the Safety
Manual Chapter 4 - Occupational Injury Control, C. Personnel
protective Equipment.
City of Andover (Existing Policy)
Chapter 4 - Occupational Injury Control
C. Personnel Protective Equipment
,
'--~
The designation and use of protective equipment for all jobs
which have an inherent injury potential shall be specified
by the supervisors involved. Detailed specifications for
the design, purchase, and use of all protective equipment
shall be coordinated among the City Safety Committee,
supervisors, and users. Specialized protective equipment
specified as mandatory on hazardous jobs shall be provided
by the City and employees shall be fully accountable for its
use and condition. Ordinary safety shoes shall be provided
by the City when required.
This section is more or less saying that the City will pay for
the total cost of the safety shoes. At the present time, I do
not know of any city that pays the whole cost of safety shoes.
City of Blaine
3.2 The City will provide an allotment of $60.00 toward the
purchase of steel-toed safety shoes. Employees may purchase
safety shoes of their choice. However, it is required that
the department heads approve the style of safety shoes and
the invoice prior to the employee submitting said invoice to
the Safety Director for reimbursement approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
'---
,..J Ci ty of Anoka
30.2 Employees are required to provide and wear steel toe safety
shoes at all times.
30.3 The Employer will reimburse each employee twenty-five
($25.00) upon proof of purchase of his/her safety shoes
unless employee is receiving the annual allowance provision
in 30.1.
City of Andover (Proposed Policy)
Chapter 4 - Occupational Injury Control, C. Personnel Protective
Equipment is to read as follows:
The designation and use of protective equipment for all jobs
which have an inherent injury potential shall be specified by the
supervisors involved. Detailed specifications for the design,
purchase, and use of all protective equipment shall be
coordinated among the City safety Committee, supervisors, and
users. Specialized protective equipment specified as mandatory
on hazardous jobs shall be provided by the City and employees
shall be fully accountable for its use and condition. Employees
are required to provide and wear steel toe safety shoes at all
times. The Employer will reimburse each employee forty-five
($45.00) per year upon proof of purchase of his/her safety shoes.
,~
The following safety rules are established for the wear and use
of safety shoes.
A. Sandals or canvas sneakers shall not be worn.
B. Employees working on jobs which have an inherent injury
potential shall wear safety boots with at least a 9" top at
all times.
If Council passes this change it should then be added to the City
Personnel policy.
'\
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
staff, Committee, Comm.
Public Works
@
FOR
ITEM
NO.
I
streets & Highways
Summer Help
BY: Frank Stone
The City Council is requested to approve summer help for the
streets and Highways Department.
We need help mowing boulevards, maintaining vehicles and an hour
per day cleaning up recycling.
This would be at $5.00 per hour for a total of 3 months. Total
summer cost is $2,500.00 and $300.00 of this total will come from
recycling. The other $2,200.00 would have to come out of streets
and Highways, Item 531 which is the sealcoating budget. At this
time that budget item has $15,000.00 in it and after the summer
help would leave a balance of $12,800.00.
We really do need this extra help. One of our full time
employees is out with a broken ankle and most likely will not be
back to work for 4 to 6 weeks.
\
----
Mr. Wayne Patchen would be willing to return for this 3 months at
$5.00 per hour. Due to his past experience with us and his
knowing what to do, I would like to see him have this summer job.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'---
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE June 16, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. ff
Sta ,Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~5M Schedule Special Meeting
. City Council & Park Boar BY:
~
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested by the Park and Recreation
Commission to hold a joint meeting.
Possible dates are as follows:
Thursday, July 9, 1992 at 7:00 PM
Thursday, July 23, 1992 at 7:00 PM
FOR
BY
The Commission has rescheduled the regular meeting to these times
due to the conflict of July 4, 1992 holiday.
To date, the Commission would like to discuss the following
topics.
'-
- Adopt - A - Park Program
Kelsey-Round Lake Park
- Ordinance 10, Section 9.07 Park Dedication
- Future Development of City Hall Complex
Additional topics may be added for the joint meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~) TO
SECOND BY
@\~'~.,
":~
'?0,
;-~
. ,rJ\l
)~:- .>'
'- ";~..:,~~;.";,~~;<,--~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ,lllnp.
16. 199?
Ar::.~jRV FOR
AG, D
I
IB/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
staff, Committee, Comm.
Finance
ITEM
NO.
Ill..
state Water Testing
Fee Discussion
Howard D. Koolick ~
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the information
relating to the recently enacted state water testing fee and
provide direction regarding any required increases in water usage
rates.
BACKGROUND
The 1992 legislature enacted an annual fee of $5.21 per connection
to a public water system to finance the state testing of water
supplies. The fee will is due in quarterly installments with the
first payment due September 30, 1992.
\~
In addition, the legislature created a commission to study and
recommend alternative future funding sOurces. However, it
appears that any future funding programs will include either an
annual flat fee per connection or a volume based fee.
The City currently has approximately 1,700 water customers with
additional connections being added constantly. I would estimate
the amount owed in September to be around $2,275. Our annual fees
owed to the state (for 1993 and 1994) will be around $9,000 to
$10,000.
The City currently bills all users quarterly. All water accounts
are charged a $5.00 per quarter flat charge plus $.95 per thousand
gallons of water used. All accounts are subject to a minimum
charge of $7.00.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,~
,)
~~
~
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Do not increase water usage fees and request the Water
Department to plan their budget for the remainder of 1992 and
all future years accordingly.
2. Increase the amount per gallon charge accordingly so as to
generate an additional $4,500 to $9,000 in the remaining two
quarters of 1992 and schedule future increases as needed to
generate the $5.21 per connection.
3. Increase the flat charge from $5.00 per quarter to $6.30(or
$6.31) per quarter and increase the minimum from $7.00 to
$8.30 (or $8.31) per quarter.
4. Other options as determined by City Council.
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION
The Finance Director recommends option i3. This option most
closely matches the City's collection to the State's anticipated
billing. In addition, option i3 results in collecting the exact
amount owed to the State, unlike option i2 which, since it is
based on usage, could result in more or less than $5.21 being
collected from each account.
Option i1 is not recommended since it results in adding
expenditures to a budget that is based on water usage, which is
an unstable revenue source. This option could result in the City
having to postpone or reduce other needed expenditures to avoid
exceeding its budget when water usage is less than estimated.
The Finance Director further recommends that any increase in water
fees be effective for the July billing since the City will need to
remit the first payment to the state in September.
CITY COUNCIL REQUIRED ACTION
The City Council, if it agrees with the Finance Director's
recommendation, should adopt the attached resolution amending the
resolution that set the fees for 1992.
If the City Council does not agree with the recommendation, it
should provide direction to the Finance Director including any
required action.
,J
:~
,.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER R003-92 WHICH ESTABLISHED
THE RATES FOR WATER USAGE.
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has imposed an annual fee
of $5.21 per connection to a public water system in order to
finance the testing of water supplies; and
WHEREAS, the City estimates that this new state fee will
result in the City remitting to the State of Minnesota
approximately $5,000 in the remainder of 1992 and approximately
$9,000 to $10,000 annually in each of the next two years with
amounts in 1995 and beyond expected to exceed $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the only funding available to finance this new
obligation is water user fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover adopted
resolution number R003-92 setting the rates for water service and
usage; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby amends section 5 of resolution number R003-
92 to read as follows:
SECTION
1.
2 .
3 .
5 WATER USAGE RATES
Billed Quarterly...............$6.30
Minimum Per Quarter............$8.30
Penalty/Late Payment...........10%
+ .95/1000 gallons
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above rates are effective
beginning with the July 1992 quarterly billing.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 16th
day of June , 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
,)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION.
DATE June 16, 1992
ITEM
NO.
fl,
Approve Purchase/Fire
Dept.
Fire Dept.
APPROVE~ FOR
AGEND~JJ
BV?
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Staff, Committees, Com.
BY: Jim Pierson
The City Council is requested to approve funds for the purchase
of 10 additional Self-contained Breathing Apparatus cylinders.
The following quotes have been received:
Alex-Air Apparatus
National Draeger
Gary Kloos
$550 ea. = $5,500
550 ea. = 5,500
555 ea. = 5,550
The Fire Department asks that the Alex Air Apparatus quote of
$5500 be accepted as they are a local distributor.
,-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
AA'"""~
~"
'<,
,:,
!,~
}j
l.'t
. ') '\ <~/7
.,../ ~-.-~ .
~":_..",..._f."
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Non-Discussion Item
Engineering
#
APPROVE~, ~OR
AGEN?; /j
BY: II
/
ITEM Award Bid/92-4/ Winslow
~~ Hills 2nd Addi tion
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of project 92-4
for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street
construction in the area of Winslow Hills 2nd Addition.
The bid opening is scheduled for June 15, 1992 at 10:30 AM. Bid
information will be provided at the City Council meeting.
Note: To date, this is not in the MUSA.
\
~
MOTION BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\ TO
'-
.
'\
I
,
~
· "\
\ --../
:~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. 071-92
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO.
STORM SEWER AND STREET
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF
AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
92-4 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
WINSLOW HILLS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 074-92, dated
19 92 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
for bids as set out in
May 19 ,
tabulated according to law
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with the
amount of for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
meeting this 19th day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
June 16, 1992
ITEM Award Bid/92-8/Trunk
N~~ San. Sewer/Andover Blvd
BY: Todd J. Haas
APPROV~OR
AGE~A,
~I..-I
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 92-8
for trunk sanitary sewer construction in the area of Andover
Boulevard/ Pinewood Estates.
The bid opening is scheduled for Monday, June 15, 1992 at 10:00
AM. Bid information will be provided at the City Council
meeting.
~)
MOTION BY
'- ) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~
~
~
\
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. 071-92
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 92-8 FOR TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF ANDOVER BLVD./PINEWOOD ESTATES
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 073-92, dated
19 92 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
for bids as set out in
May 19 ,
tabulated according to law
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with the
amount of for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this 19th day of
City Council at a
, 19 , with Councilmen
. voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria volk - City Clerk
@\"""i;-~
,,;\
'*1~
;1
JI
'\ ~ ,1"
\ -"., ..:."/-'
J ',<.":,",,~.'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. .
Non-Discuss~on Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Engineering
~
BY:
ITEM Accept Petition/Fox
NO. Meadows/92-14
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of feasibility
report for the improvements of streets, Project 92~14 in the Fox
Meadows subdivision area.
Attached is the map of the area that benefits from the
improvement in orange.
Proposed total number of lots - 36
(includes Fox Meadows Park 2 units)
Number in favor of improvement - 30
Number against - 4
Number unavailable - 2
(includes park)
'--
Note: The City is responsible for 2 units for the park as
indicated in the assessment manual.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~)TO
SECOND BY
,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS
, PROJECT
AREA.
NO. 92-14 IN THE
FOX MEADOWS
WHEREAS, the
May 28
improvements; and
City Council has received a petition, dated
, 19~, requesting the construction of
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
. \
'J
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to BRA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
~)
~
11>339 ti
: "14
1"300 , '. , . >'i
IbZS7 . ,
.-:~ '.
J 1 '-Z50
. l
'c. z.,., I
- -:
)
1r..2OO "
.'~
? /f&'4:'f (
.'
.. "
:.1 /1,150 ;r,ollf!
~
:
5~~
i535t
~jOj
m?
lr;rttrvET
~\I MAY 281992,_D
'\
)
'J
'..~'~~
-1\.'''''
f." \J.J ..\,
.\. ~ .,
\....& .i;'
'. .,J'
-..{..~~~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
Date:.K~ I??<
No. '1e-/4
Gentlemen:
"
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
_taX Mec..J.ow.5
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City F't., pa..V:"j 0t--<3...lIel streets a......J Cl~t-...:~
bids -/-0 be Qffr-otleJ.. 6'1 ~... ,hef-w /;J~ ~.l. 'd...f Oc..u"l ~/'~ .
cost af SCl~J .i,"~.d5v CHlCBt: be ass~H:scd U'::jcl.i..", L Ll"e Lene:t~ 1:1ng
clu1:hu.L.i~<::J BY ChapL<::.L 429, LawS or Hinnc3at;::.~
OWNER ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO
IS- 7 Ie ~a... KO-TQ..
S" 7 I \ )) ""k o+ct
5" 7/yD
~ha1: d"c
PTopcrt}, 11:3
SIG~IATURE OF
CJ
~ -\-11..
:-J
e~c...
8 e f ~cJ~k
~. :( 0 j) a.k~'\ c....
~31 .tQ..\<.~~c....
5 ~ 00 ba.ko~~
S-921 .b~t>'\- "-
930 .D a. k 0 '\-c...
6 0 0 f)<1.k <>1ct
o I ( Da..bic...
This petition was circulated by: h; ~ket Go kflLt&soiA...
Address: /57'-1, J)a..kCl+-~ S'f-- ,(J UJ AI\.4.ClII'~f" /I4.).j .,5.:5 Q 7
,
')
'-./
""Q"~'..'''~''''~'
I "
I .
\. 6 "
\A .J
". .:-.,~;~.....".Y
CITY of ANDOVER
;~~~t ~~~t'tV EO;
n\ MAY" 3 1992 .
,-
"
I.Date:Ha.y /9?7..
No. qZ-1L/
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
't oX [\\ea.&Dl,,)S
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City For fO-\J;^i <3t"o...",er S-rl'ee"f..$ a.....J.. C\C,fct:"
b,C1510 b-e o...."P{'-l.ve'l Ly ~ -e he/r;:,w J;''i+-er~ (')Wl<\.er-5 "
QJld that Lht:: cost of ~it'! ;m~rovemen!.. bp a:::J3C3.,<::J. Il.gainE+ t-h", hpn~fitin9
property, 1l.3 author;7Pt'! hy rh~pteL 429, Law., of M;nnQ8eta._~
, '\
'..J
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
57 II
~ 01 FM
/~- ~ 3D Fux
~- 't 0 I to'x
9 ~ l Fox
(!)f) I Fo)C
/?
J
hz~>s-,~-~
'\
_J
Cif PQrk.: ~ LeTS c:> (JI'''C<./e...T
(b fL'
This petition was circulated by: MlC~t'( a, ~l.LJ.so"'-
Address: /51'1/ [)itb\-e<... Sf-.. ,.oC,.J AJ1dCllI'e<l" PIA.) 5"SJ'U~
I I
...~~..
:J~
,-- ...LJ. .s'.'...'..-..
~.. 'LE~1J En
KI M.'\Y; 81992 1U
,.-
CITY of ANDOVER
,.'
Date:
:;/27/97-
I
92 -1'-/
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
~~c7--'(J S"7- - FUK Npec.cl.b<<J5
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by (
Construction of City .5'7,JL-:::.-r-:-Fd'/ po..v,''] Jrcwf'1 S+r.p~t- a..~ol OJaf-o..,'^
b,'r1s TDbe o..pl'rtJlI{"J. by -+~f' bek,w/t'sfe..(.6WYler-J ,
and lhat the ...ncd- or said im['rougmcnt be <>",,,,,,,,,,,,,eJ. agaiu::>l lh", L",u",rlti-ng
.pr?pE:...ly, as aulhv....:.z:E:G hy Chapter 429. r,r1W" of MinncElota.
'\ SIGNATURE OF OWNER
\_~
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
/
/.
I
I
V"'
11-<.. .
.0.J.
.,
,
" /
CD
r1)
This petition was circulated by: ~\[:r..u l..l.. \k~('~
Address: l583l 'DA(d"'"A i':f .,J. W' A/t!{})i!l~ t1fAJ SS'.3Jy
,,)
''''~'~'''.
~r^ .
~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
"
Date:
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
-
h><
/YJ~.OdtuS'
do hereby petition that said.portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City ..5/;.::.=~1R IS> (' fO-u.'''j j ra..vel S+,.ee.'b 'li:..J..
&h+a.;" .b,ds 7-t>;~ o.tJJ('~vt"fJ 6~ rJ...e 6e/tJp.J /,'.1f-eJ.. DUJl/er.L
I v
crnd t:ha t the ,..ned- nf oaia impro. e-mcnt: be a33esse,] a.ya..Lll<> L lhe- be-fieii tiuy ,
~roperty, ~s authoT;7~d by Chaptor 429, Law:! vI M~nnesota. -
YES
NO
'"," '-:':'~
./
/{l
/
/
. It '-\.
-. 1M n+- Wt-NFi:. NW
"717 L-J
c/
v
~
'\
I
\'_/
V
(~:
,--,.
t)
This petition was circulated by: ~ t).)~
Address: t'5A3i D~(TI.A- st I\JW '{\N'.)c)VC( yltl\J ~~l(
CITY OF ANDOVER
. '\
,~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO N . . t
. on-Dlscusslon I em
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Engineering
~~
FOR
ITEM Accept Feasibility
NJ'l,.. Report/Fox Meadows/92-14 BY:
Todd J. Haas
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution receiving
feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of
streets, Project 92-14 in the Fox Meadows area.
The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 7, 1992 at
7:30 PM.
\
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
,J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS
PROJECT NO. 92-14 IN THE FOX MEADOWS
AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted the 16th
day of June , 19 92 ,a Feasibility Report has been
prepared by BRA for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
16th day of June , 19 92 ; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of $ 194,390.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 92-14, for the improvements.
u
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $ 194,390.00
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 7th day of July , 19 92 in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 PM and the
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such
hearing and improvement as required by law.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
~
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE June 16, 1992
-#
B
ITEM Report/92-9/1 76th
N? Lane NW
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
AGENDA SECTION
NO. . .
Non-Dlscusslon Item
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution recelvlng
feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of
streets, Project 92-9 along 176th Lane NW and Round Lake
Boulevard.
The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 7, 1992 at
7:45 PM.
r-
i
'-
MOTION BY
~)TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~~
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS ,
PROJECT NO. 92-9 IN THE AREA ALONG 176TH LANE NW BETWEEN
ORCHID STREET NW AND ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 055-92, adopted the 21st
day of April ,19 92 ,a Feasibility Report has been
prepared by BRA for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
16th day of June , 19 92 ; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of $ 26.975.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 92-9. for the improvements.
~
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $ 26,975.00
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 7th day of July , 19 92 in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:45 PM and the
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such
hearing and improvement as required by law.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
o
Victoria volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
'\
\J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
DATE
~TJM Accept Feasibility
I~ Report/92-12/0ak Hollow
#'
A~~RI~ED FOR
AG, N I ~
,,/ 'U
BYf
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. . .
Non-Dlscusslon Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Enginee ring
BY: Todd J. Haas
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution receiving
feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of
streets, project 92-12 in the Oak Hollow area.
The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 7, 1992 at
8:00 PM.
.~
MOTION BY
,_) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
..J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF
PROJECT NO. 92-12
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
STREETS
IN THE OAK HOLLOW
AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 075-92, adopted the 19th
day of May , 19 92 , a Feasibility Report has been
prepared by BRA for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
16th day of June , 19 92 ; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of $ 90,575.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 92-12, for the improvements.
r "
U
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $ 90,575.00
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 7th day of July , 19 92 in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall at B:OO PM and the
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such
hearing and improvement as required by law.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 ,with Councilmen
'voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
~-)
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
,)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Non-Discussion Item
Engineering
~
A~;.R~?J) FOR
AG~ io
{v/
~J.M Accept Petition/92-15/
-20 Hidden Creek East 5th
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of feasibility
report for the improvements of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm
sewer and streets, Project 92-15 in the Hidden Creek East 5th
Addi tion area.
,~
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
. )
'-J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF
WATERMAIN, STORU SEWER AND STREETS
NO. 92-15 IN THE HIDDEN CREEK EAST 5TH ADDITION
ORDERING PREPARATION
SANITARY SEWER,
, PROJECT
AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
June 3 , 19~, requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
~--.J
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is
$1,000.00
3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
'\
, )
(
(
-9~~"
\
, )
June 3, 1992
Mr. James Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
l685 Crosstown Boulevard
Andover MN 55304
.,.-- E C Ei V E --
H ."'N 'j 1992 U
RE: Hidden Creek East 5th Addition
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
"
,~)
Good Value Homes, Inc. does hereby petition for improvement~
by the construction of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer
and streets with concrete curb and gutter for all 33 lots ir
our proposed Hidden Creek 5th Addition. I have enclosed a
copy of the Hidden Creek East 5th Addition plat. The cost
of the project is to be assessed to the benefiting
properties.
. ,,~ .
C'T\' 1"\:: .~ .,t''''Vt=R
The petition is unanimous and therefore the public hearing
may be waived. We may also waive our right to appeal the
assessments.
Please prepare a feasibility study for the above mentioned
project.
I have enclosed a $1000.00 check for the required escrow
deposit.
Sincerely,
~~
~J{i~ ~, Boller
Development Assistant
Enclosures
:jb
\
)
GOOD VALeE Ho:'.IES. I:\"C. . Registered Builder' PGO 93rd Lwe :'II.c.. 3,,,ine. :';IN 55,ncl..1396 . Phone: (612) 780-5510
m\.rA~)
" \.~\Il
) '~h .-)'
-~____ "i~'':~;'>_
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE June 16, 1992
Non-Discussion Item
~JMRepo~~/92-15/Hid~~n
''&1. Creek East 5th
Engineering
#
APPRO~nOR
AGEc.~
BY: /
J
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement
and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the
improvement of project 92-15 for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm
sewer and streets in the following area of Hidden Creek East 5th
Addition.
\
~-
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
) TO
SECOND BY
'"--
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
OF PROJECT 91-15 FOR
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
S.S., WM, ST, AND STORM SEWER
OF HIDDEN CREEK EAST 5TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 16th day of June
19 92 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by
presented to the Council on the 16th day of June
TKDA and
, 19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 300,373.26
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated
total cost of improvements of $ 300,373.26 ,waive the Public
Hearing and order improvements.
u
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $ 9,000.00 with such
payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and
specifications.
Meeting this
and adopted by the
day of
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
~)
victoria Volk - City Clerk
~."""""
~,'::~
~~
\:c.
\)
j<
ti
oJ' I
"'1;'. .",j"
" ,:,,",;'".",:~:.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
ITEM
NO.
Accept Peti_tion
/92-16/Pheasant GI nay:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility
report for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm
sewer and streets, project 92-16 in the pheasant Glen area.
,
'---
MOTION BY
~)TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF SANITARY SEWER,
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS
PROJECT NO. 92-16, IN THE
PHEASANT GLEN
AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
June 9, 1992 , requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the
signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is
$1,000.00
Q
3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
Meeting this
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~
,,)
Q
r OJ
'----
qz-(c:'
~ -:J ~~ {: _,i' .~-:'~ ~,,:1 ~ ~ fu.:~ ?""\ if....." ~- f;?- $ ~~. ";~ ~"> ?1 :- f'1: ) W-J""" _~
t4U-' ;~f=lJ...;\ii\~~~ :~f\~ ~Jt"""'li1-J U~1\H[{-t\l~ J.-~
~ >t - ... :,,,-,,,, ',..,;.$ '.;,,_ ',*"I ~.:1 .'i<_ ,""_ ,.{ __ '" '!Ii"?;<< %'....,..~ <;i ,~~ '"
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENI, INC.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMEN I. INC.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENt: INC.
June 9, 1992
-"EC-ETVE~ .
~ juN 9 ~92 1U
.-
James E. Schrantz
City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: PROPOSED Pheasant Glen
SUBDIVISION
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Hokanson Development. Inc. does hereby petition for improvements by the
construction of water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets with concrete
curb and gutter with the costs of the improvement to be assessed against the
benefiting property which is described as:
PHEASANT GLEN
Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived.
We request that a feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible. We have
enclosed a check for $1000.00 for the feasibility report expenses.
(THE $1000 WILL BE CREDITED TOWARD 15% IMPROVEMENT
ESCROW.)
Sincerely,
!:~d!~
Ro;~. Hokanson, Pres.
9174 (santi Street N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55434
(612) 786-3130 Fax (612) 784-9136
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,J
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1992
Planning
~
FOR
ITEM
NO.
~.
Revoke SUP - Mining
14817 Rd. Lake Blvd.
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to approve the revocation of a Special
Use Permit for a mining permit granted to Marvin Benson on July 2,
1985 on the property located at 14817 Round Lake Boulevard NW.
Please consult the attached report presented to the Planning and
Zoning Commission at their May 26, 1992 meeting.
Planning & Zoning Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their May 26, 1992 meeting,
recommended the Special Use Permit for a mining permit be
revoked. Please consult the minutes included in your council
packets as well.
Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption.
',,--
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
:_ [ TO
,~
:~-J
\
'-..J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION REVOKING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF MARVIN BENSON FOR
A MINING PERMIT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14817 ROUND LAKE
BOULEVARD NW.
WHEREAS, Marvin Benson has requested that the Special Use
Permit for a mining permit granted to him on July 2, 1985 be
revoked on the property located at 14817 Round Lake Boulevard NW;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request should be
granted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council that the Special Use Permit for a mining permit
be revoked as requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to revoke the Special Use Permit
for a mining permit granted to Marvin Benson on July 2, 1985.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
16th day of June, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 26, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
8. Discussion
Revocation of SUP
(Mining Permit) - 14817
Round Lake Blvd. NW
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
=t
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
Marvin Benson has requested that the fipecial Use Permit to
conduct mining activities on his property located at 14817 Round
Lake Boulevard Nw be revoked.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Benson was granted a Special Use Permit (Mining Permit) on
July 2, 1985. Attached for Commission review is the resolution
approved by the City Council. Please note the conditions of the
permit, especially condition *4, which requires Mr. Benson to
refill any excavation completed in the front three (3 a.) acres
with clean fill. To date, this requirement has not been
completed. It should also be noted that condition *3, the posting
~, of a $2,000 escrow security for completion of work was never
(~ received. Included with your packet materials please also find
the minutes from the July 2, 1985 City Council meeting.
REVIEW
Staff in preparing the item for Commission review has discovered
that the property is classified as a Type 3, wetland. Concerned
with the recent passage of new wetland regulations (Wetland
Conservation Act 1991) in regard to the filling of the property as
stated in the resolution, Staff contacted Tim Kelley of the Coon
Creek watershed District. Staff and Mr. Kelley conducted a site
inspection and have found that the filling of the property
and the wetland would require mitigation and replacment. The
depressions currently hold water and numerous species of wildlife
are utilizing the wetland.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning recommend to the
City Council that the Special Use Permit (Mining Permit) be
revoked and that Mr. Benson is not required to fill the front
three (3 a.) acres as specified by the resolution dated July 2,
1985.
, '\
.... _~I
.)
: )
"
,
'.j
=
.F
[' EC-rrVEO
R MAY 41992
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD.N.W.
ANDOVER,MN.55304
5/1/92
WE HAVE HAD A MINING PERMIT ON OUR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14817 ROUND
LAKE BLVD.N.W.,WHICH WAS APPLIED FOR IN 1983 AND GRANTED IN JULY
OF 1985. WE UNDERSTAND THAT IT WILL ALWAYS REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY
UNLESS THERE IS A REQUEST TO HAVE IT REMOVED. SO AT THIS TIME WE
ARE MAKING THE REQUEST TO HAVE IT REMOVED.
THANK YOU,
'~~.e ./Z--,'" -
MARVIN E. BENSON
"1 \<6ZO
I
~ZOJ
(1
f'iJ- / ~
~ I "
~I
--'
,""""
I '
I _
1
}
I I
I~ ~ r s
:0 I, 0 I ~
-~~ ~ ::
~ -
; .. ~ ~.,
. <
-
'$\41
'-- ~
&4" ~ ~ g ,,,.
~\~~ \ ~
,~JL
~. ,j}'
~S~~}! ""1
':i\ I'i _ ,f
I ,,- - ~ - ..,
-l--I ~ ~ ~ 1$
~ - ::::--.J ,Ii'
;;,-=-- ~ '/R ~. ;tV' ~
1\ ~ .:r .A' .# i<:.....
ii . 'l/ 0 0
- :r ~
~ '>>. '" ~ 15/1,
~ "'<>'" ~.. "'1 ....".~ \ ' ,~ ,071
- ~ \~ 3167 311q 15'078 r
:llJl\ ~1
\~o..z. -:,," 3084- 15017h
./ f-- 3OS1 1-.... I \
I~ 3:" 1 '""
It~ 'l. 1 \,4QS, ~
I}.- ~ 31Gb \3/1g ! 307b I .. N
I"'.
-
~I
'I~
"Jr(".p
,'" ~
,=1~
1>311 ]""
~\~I g
I~).d If)
~
"-
~
~
Q
~
~ IS1rT
f--,
'5ij
'" .
~
:j-
~ ~lS
h~.,
~
~..
~I
~
~
"
~
'" ~
:::
.,.
;;;
<<
"
"
~
]
151/,7
15:35
1\
I
b
c
~CID
~
~
~
d
a~' '\
\..J
~-
~
~~~; ':i\,:$ 00< ". -:"':1 ~ H =;j 1 1n-.'7 ~ !~~€],:~~
'''" + ~\'~'J ~ "'i ;! ~ "1-:'8 . ,I ',!
~{.,;.. "~~~,~ g" ~. '" C~ ~1~ISi;."'-I:.
";~,i:'~f ~ ~"~ /"' Ol ~ )'~_~'
~'" 'Y~ ..-.~ r;;; ;;; _~, "Ii'
~.., ~~-I":::'~'i ~ -- -,orl --~:;:~. ?i~' \ . '<, ,
/~y.'\ ~~~':.. ...... I iIli ... ~ (J,,~ .J:
;," /~ ooF~" ~....-~' i ,,:;' ,.. .
;,'" ,;e =~_... _! ""-~'"
--, '~~ ~....~'~ I "~i""'1
" ",,"" ~ i=:! ,... J.'6 "-..,,,~,, ~ r
.... ..j;'- ~ F.;l I .:IJ ...:+ ~,~ ..~.
I "# '""ii" . <ooL::." po i :,~~" ,,:$:~
"..'';,;i,';./'/!1!' ~ J,_A -- ';;;;, , ,,"l';.n,::.~~
l /'/",, ',I;,./iil ...~ ~, ~ r.1~1!iT~ 3'11;!i ~.:s I ~.." "'" "" ,.~~.
"I " ~",.. !~ ~1~1~IU~I~I~~g'~IN ~1":!~~:1J~ , ~ ';
~~~:~ "'10 ",.::t ~~;I:i;l.f~lJ\ l' ~" '4- .
i"," f",,,. \~i9b \..~ ,,. ~1~lilf ~'t!~im;l~ I ,.",.:!'!jf "'<t
'V^ <I< ,\ ~ " " N" . \>:
v 'fI' ~ . '~~1~1~111:, ~ ~/ ~
' O~f , "> -: i~:<~(.~;,;:-. "''''',(if F_
~!~i~lll~~ ~ 'T~ v'''':_ ,,.'!'" ./J "G,
~1i}1i:i~l,qJ ."''t'' ~ $J 1;,"'-r" _ ursl~W /,....~~~
.,''RIiil~'~I~If--c 'I,.., -l'#'. i~i'!>I:!I:iI,j ~~'~:;; :1;/ I4<>i' ."(. ~~~
.... ,^" 'Va;'.. "J .. .. 'V ~.w. I PARK ~ :ii ~ Ie fef """" ~ ) Ie ". ,,...
f~:?'''~I.B -- -- ;<<- - , ~~\, c\; .., f! Zl!AD J~I~ f '" ~ N ~ ~ .,.~ :\-- ''''* ~" ~"
-I"i i"''''~'. Ca' .;!!:r~ '- """'~"l~I~"llJ}~$I~I;!I~~ii~ \.~ /.,,:,1J, ~""o~,.!:.
.': -, v. , '" ~ '" ~ ~ ,-' ;;.. NIl< N Ill~ N" N N ~ ,- :-.'<\; "" 1:f :'
~.' .-.-.\ PARK ~<5''' f f "~ c: i'~i~I~~ i i~IHI~ ~I~~ ""~I".,,,,, 0 ~~N
.=J ~ ~ Bf' ,;:I~'N" N N N.......", ." 8'1]
~'~.- Ii,:'!:~~,::i:~~l:; ''". ~:1 t!~,i.!.r/f (, ~Id~
~Hmlilil.~ 1;;lml~lil!I..;"v,.,. '~l ,,"<" ,~.P-N N N ~lf~~~~", ,.7 lal NI;l~I~~VF!g;$~
' ::';:~';.":JW-"~ -""""~~~I.'l" ~~""NI.ai.l?'>.AI.:. ..... "
,;%,. .I,!, ,~ l~jilil~I~l!J..U;,;.;;'Ili i/J',.
........, -1..t",I~1 ~IO 11'm1:J_
9
Of~~p:;slc
POV\,
:",c 1 . Mlh
~ ~'\Jgr
?EMC.
~r'-\
'''' -c..J
c:D-fV8f
/ fEMC.
fEMC
(J--PFOICJ
\T-?EMCd
<:.
:J
'Fele
PEMe~
\/
PU&F
G--fEMC
-~ --
rEMe
"
A-fV8F
PW~ VfEMe
}l .
P'Ol,
rE""- ~ PEMe
cb.
QtMA
551
~PSSIB
./'
'. ~ \\
PlMC~~a
i>I&F . 1:,._ .."'"'~_. .;~~=-
-; EM:., :.:- .. 1[,
f'[MQ
Pf06p.
.I
'/"-PEMC
!<~
I!,~-:~~",-
.
i;'
PFOIA~. .~."" ~C, PE~
. 1
' --:-.._-".._-c
",.- -- - 1";: "__. \
P~l&-,
'- - PIMC.-
1't1'l'G' "-
<, ~
~BH. PSS6~ ~
. ~~~ProIC. _'~ ~~
--{.
..-#
PEr.;~~
""'" r:
:
~
{
p
."._..~...,.
. ". ~ .
'-, .
. .... "
> PI:
"
Pmf>.
~
'\
'--J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R066-85
MOTION by Councilman
Orttel
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MINING
SOILS IN EXCESS OF 400 CUBIC YARDS AS REQUESTED BY MARVIN BENSON
FROM PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14817 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice the Planning
and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the
request of Marvin Benson to mine in excess of 400 cubic yards of dirt
from property located at 14817 Round Lake Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, after such hearing and review the Planning and
Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the request, with
reasons for such recommendation as 1) it will not be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of the community, 2) it will
not cause any serious traffic congestion, 3) it will not seriously
depreciate surrounding property values, and 4) it is in harmony with
the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the reasons
cited by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the Special Use Permit requested
by Marvin Benson to mine soils in excess of 400 cubic yards on
property located at 14817 Round Lake Boulevard, subject to the following
conditions:
1. No dirt will be removed from the site before 8 a.m. or
between the hours of 4 and 6 p.m., or after 8 p.m.
2. The Special Use Permit will be subject to an annual
review.
3. The Permit is subject to the posting of a $2,000
escrow security for completion of the work.
';
'-~)
4. Any excavation completed in the front three acres
will b~-refilled with clean fill.
5. The rest of the property will not be subject to refilling
unless word to the contrary is received from the
Department of Natural Resources.
'-
'J
. ",-.,
<~
.- "-- ~
.)
6. The truck route has been identified as County Road 9.
Dirt being removed will be limited to the south 600
feet of the property and east of Round Lake boulevard,
MOTION seconded by Councilman
Lachinski
and adopted
by the,. City Council at a
Reqular
Meeting this 2nd
day
of
July
, 1985.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~ tv ',,&--//~
Jer y Win. chitl, Mayor
P. K. Lindquist, City Clerk/A. Adm.
:J
"
.;~
\~J
c-
....~. .
(
Regular City Council Meeting
July 2, 1985 - Minutes
Page 2
MINING PERMIT/M. BENSON
Mayor Windschitl noted the comments from the DNR indicating they had no objection
to the ~ining permit; however, there appears to be an indication that they expect
Mr. Benson to fill in everything that is being taken out. And he thought it is
Mr. Benson's intention to fill in the front three acres only as a buildable site.
Marvin Benson - stated he has no objection to filling in the front three acres. He
had lntended to do that in the future, but would be willing to do it in conjunction
with the Special Use Permit. He also told the DNR he would be filling a roadway to
get at the material", and that he would fill in the front three acres along County
Road g. He didn't give any indication that he would refill the entire parcel. And
the DNR had no problem as far as the water table is concerned.
Council generally agreed to approve the permit without filling the rear area unless
they hear contrary to that from the DNR. .
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution approving a Special
Use Permit for Marvin Benson at property located at 14817 Round Lake Boulevard for
the mining of soils with the following conditions: no dirt will be removed from
the site before 8 a.m. or between the hours of 4 and 6 p.m., or after 8 p.m.; special
use permit will be subject~tQ,aQ annual review; subject to the posting of a $2,000
. escrow securi ty'for"complebi-orii'dfthe'-work;'-and' that"any- excavation comp leted'in the'
front three acres be refilled with clean fill; and that the rest of the property
will not be subject to refilling unless word to the contrary is received from the
Department of Natural Resources. (See Resolution R066-85) Motion carried on a 3-Yes
vote.
DRIVEWAY RESTORATION/D. PAGE
Mr. Schrantz explained the work done by the developer was in the right of way and on
Mr. Page's driveway. The road and right of way was then dedicated to the City. Mr.
Carlson is now willing to pave the portion of restoration on Mr. Page's property,
but not for that portion on what is now the City's right of way, about 15 feet.
D. Page - stated the title of his land gives him the right to get out to the road.
It was a blacktop driveway out to the street before it was tore up by the developer
to correct the grade to the street. He had expected the driveway to be reblacktopped.
Council discussion noted that the entire 60 feet of the road was within the plat and
came from the developer's property, that the developer feels Mr. Page in effect
received a free paved street past his property, that the developer was required to
put in the street, and questioned what role the City should play in this dispute.
Attorney Hawkins stated it sounds like a private matter between the developer and
Mr. Page, a dispute between two landowners. Council agreed, and advised Mr. Page
to negotiate an agreement with the developer.
There was also a question as to whether or not the easement to the east of the paved'
street was vacated with the plat. That item needed further research as the
documentation for that was not readily available during the discussion.
BOND SALE - 1985 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Attorney Hawkins briefly reviewed the copy of the revised calculations for the bond
sale for 1985 utility improvements.
MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution providing for the
saJeof $2,350,000.00 worth of General Obligation Improvement Bonds for
Projects, as presented by the City Attorney. (See Resolution R067-85)
on a 3-Yes vote.
issuance and
1985 Improvement
Motion carried
CITY OF ANDOVER
,..)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ,llln~
1 Ii .
lQQ7.
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
Howard D. Koolick to<.-
Finance Director
ITEM
NO.
dI.
Adopt Resol./Arbitrage
Rebate Assistance
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution which requests help from our Senators and
Representative in alleviating the burden and costs of arbitrage
rebate by supporting the increase of the small issuer exception
and redefining gross proceeds.
BACKGROUND
The City's bond counsel, Dave Kennedy, and I recently discussed
the City's compliance with arbitrage rebate. As we talked
about this complex and costly subject, both Dave and I agreed
that it might be in the City's best interest to communicate our
concerns to our elected officials in Washington D.C.
The proposed resolution is designed to be mailed with the
attached letters to Senators Wellstone, Durenberger and
Representative Sikorksi. I will have each Councilmember sign
the letters once the resolution number is inserted in the first
paragraph.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
.~
o
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING ASSISTANCE IN AMENDING THE
RELATING TO ARBITRAGE REBATE REQUIREMENTS.
LAWS
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States of America has
enacted laws that require local governments that issue tax-
exempt bonds to rebate to the Internal Revenue Service any
positive difference between the interest earned on the gross
proceeds of the bonds and the interest paid on the bonds; and
WHEREAS, these "arbitrage rebate regulations" include an
exception for small issuers which are defined as governments
who issue less than $5 million in tax-exempt bonds in a
calendar year; and
WHEREAS, a growing community, like the City of Andover,
where new infrastructure is required to accommodate rapid
residential growth, can easily exceed the small issuer amount
and thereby incur substantial costs to comply with the complex
rebate requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover, rather than tax all
residents, issues three-year temporary bonds and assesses the
benefitting properties for the cost of the infrastructure and
requires that these assessments be paid as the benefitted
properties are developed; and
waEREAS, the "arbitrage rebate regulations" define gross
proceeds to include not only the proceeds from the sale of the
bonds and investment earnings, but also any other amounts to be
used to pay debt service on the bonds which include the above
mentioned assessments; and
WHEREAS, the City
recognizes the need for
prevent intentional abuses
Council of the City of Andover
arbitrage rebate requirements to
involving tax-exempt bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the
the City of Andover hereby requests its
Representative help alleviate the burdens and
with arbitrage rebate for small issuers, such as
Andover, by supporting an increase in the
exception from its current level of $5 million to
City Council of
Senators and
costs involved
the City of
small issuer
$10 million.
<)
. '\
\J
)
'-./
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Andover hereby requests that its elected officials support
changing the definition of gross proceeds by either eliminating
the reference to "all other amounts to be used to pay debt
service", excluding amounts held in a bona fide debt service
fund or redefining gross proceeds to be less encompassing.
Adopted by the City
16th day of June
Council
, 1992.
of the City of Andover on this
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
" )
~
(!N
~ Ai"/
..c-~~,.;..t'V
j"u-n~ 16,
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
1992
The Honorable Paul Wellstone
united states Senate
702 Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Wellstone:
Enclosed please find City of Andover Resolution Number R -92.
This resolution requests your help in alleviating the burden
and costs incurred by many governments, such as the City of
Andover, in complying with the arbitrage rebate requirements.
The City of Andover, located in central Anoka County, is a
third tier suburb of Minneapolis with a 1990 census population
of 15,216. The City is primarily a bedroom community with a
small number of locally owned and operated businesses. Over
the last seven years, the City has experienced a tremendous
amount of new residential construction.
, \ Due to the rapid growth, the City was required to issue more
'.~ than $5 million in bonds in 1987 and 1988. Upon maturity in
1990 and 1991, the City was required to rebate to the Internal
Revenue Service arbitrage earnings of $223,778.31. These
arbitrage earnings resulted not from unspent bond proceeds, but
from prepaid special assessments paid by the improved
properties in accordance with City policy.
Since the City of Andover is a small city and lacks the
expertise to perform the arbitrage calculations, a consultant
was required to perform the calculations. The cost of the
calculations totaled $17,604.90. In addition, the City staff
spent more than 150 hours compiling the required information.
We appreciate in advance your help as requested in the
resolution. Please feel free to contact Mr. Howard D. Koolick,
City Finance Director, should you have questions or require
more information.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
)
Kenneth D. Orttel
Mayor
Todd Smith
Councilmember
Marjorie Perry
Councilmember
Don Jacobson
Councilmember
Jack McKelvey
Councilmember
<)
(tii')
,L~/
-L_~,.............._9
June 16,
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
1992
The Honorable Dave Durenburger
United States Senate
154 Russell Building
washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Durenburger:
Enclosed please find City of Andover Resolution Number R -92.
This resolution requests your help in alleviating the burden
and costs incurred by many governments, such as the City of
Andover, in complying with the arbitrage rebate requirements.
The City of Andover, located in central Anoka County, is a
third tier suburb of Minneapolis with a 1990 census population
of 15,216. The City is primarily a bedroom community with a
small number of locally owned and operated businesses. Over
the last seven years, the City has experienced a tremendous
amount of new residential construction.
:~J
Due to the rapid growth, the City was required to issue more
than $5 million dollars in bonds in 1987 and 1988. Upon
maturity in 1990 and 1991, the City was required to rebate to
the Internal Revenue Service arbitrage earnings of $223,778.31.
These arbitrage earnings resulted not from unspent bond
proceeds, but from prepaid special assessments paid by the
improved properties in accordance with City policy.
Since the City of Andover is a small city and lacks the
expertise to perform the arbitrage calculations, a consultant
was required to perform the calculations. The cost of the
calculations totaled $17,604.90. In addition, the City staff
spent more than 150 hours compiling the required information.
We appreciate in advance your help as requested in the
resolution. Please feel free to contact Mr. Howard D. Koolick,
City Finance Director, should you have questions or require
more information.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
'~
._ ...1
Kenneth D. Orttel
Mayor
Todd Smith
Councilmember
Marjorie Perry
Councilmember
Don Jacobson
Councilmember
Jack McKelvey
Councilmember
,~)
+"',,~...
(!A)
~7
't...<-~~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
June 16, 1992
The Honorable Gerry Sikorski
House of Representatives
414 Cannon Building
washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Sikorski:
Enclosed please find City of Andover Resolution Number R -92.
This resolution requests your help in alleviating the burden
and costs incurred by many governments, such as the City of
Andover, in complying with the arbitrage rebate requirements.
The City of Andover, located in central Anoka County, is a
third tier suburb of Minneapolis with a 1990 census population
of 15,216. The City is primarily a bedroom community with a
small number of locally owned and operated businesses. Over
the last seven years, the City has experienced a tremendous
amount of new residential construction.
! ~ Due to the rapid growth, the City was required to issue more
\~ than $5 million dollars in bonds in 1987 and 1988. Upon
maturity in 1990 and 1991, the City was required to rebate to
the Internal Revenue Service arbitrage earnings of $223,778.31.
These arbitrage earnings resulted not from unspent bond
proceeds, but from prepaid special assessments paid by the
improved properties in accordance with City policy.
Since the City of Andover is a small city and lacks the
expertise to perform the arbitrage calculations, a consultant
was required to perform the calculations. The cost of the
calculations totaled $17,604.90. In addition, the City staff
spent more than 150 hours compiling the required information.
We appreciate in advance your help as requested in the
resolution. please feel free to contact Mr. Howard D. Koolick,
City Finance Director, should you have questions or require
more information.
Sincerely;
CITY OF ANDOVER
)
.~
Kenneth D. Orttel
Mayor
Todd Smith
Councilmember
Marjorie Perry
Councilmember
Don Jacobson
Councilmember
Jack McKelvey
Councilmember
@\)
~ '- /'
'- ,~. .<J
',~-".::!:,-:::~.,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ,i"n<> 1 h
1 QQ?
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
Howard D. Koolick /-tr(.
BY: Finance Di rector
ITJM Adopt Resolution/
. 6, Expendi ture Reimburse.
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution regarding the reimbursement of expenditures with bond
proceeds.
BACKGROUND
Dave Kennedy, the city's Bond Counsel, recommended the City adopt
the resolution in the attached letter. I have held off presenting
it to the City Council until I could get adequate information for
Exhibit A.
r
"-
I will be working with Bill Hawkins on the actual issuance of the
bonds. We intend to present a recommendation regarding the sale
of the bonds to the Council on July 7th.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
/ '\ TO
,-I
SECOND BY
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
,-)
470 Pillsbury Center. Minneapolis. :\1innesota 55-402
Telephone (612) 337.9300
Facsimile (612) JJ7~9310
"
February 19, 1992
In Augus, 1991, I wrote to you describing the Treasury's proposed
regulations-referred to as the "reimbursement rules"-providing, in general terms,
that proceeds of tax-exempt governmental bonds used to reimburse the issuer for
prior expenditures will not be deemed to have been "spent" unless certain
requirements are met. After receiving many critical comments, the Internal Revenue
Service revised the regulations and published them on January 30, 1992. A summary
of the final reimbursement rules is enclosed for your information.
The final rules are effective for bonds issued after March 2, 1992. Some of the
cumbersome features of the proposed regulations have been revised, but the overall
concept remains the same.
C) In most general terms the reimbursement rules provide that:
(i) a declaration of "official intent" by the City must be made on or before
the date of an expenditure that the City expects to reimburse from bond
proceeds;
(ii) the reimbursement from bond proceeds must be made within a) one year
after the expenditure or b) one year after the project financed was
"placed in service," whichever date is later; and
(ill) the expenditures to be reimbursed must be "capital expenditures"
under general federal tax law (bond issuance costs are deemed "capital
expenditures") .
There are two key exceptions to the "official intent" requirement: (1) the
declaration is not required for "preliminary expenditures" (such as engineering,
architectural work, and bond issuance costs) up to 20% of the bond amount; and (2)
"official intent" during the period from September 8, 1989 to March 1, 1992 can be
shown by "objective" evidence that the issuer intended at the time of the
expenditure to reimburse itself from bond proceeds.
Enclosed is a sample resolution that we think will put the City in compliance with the
final rules if it is adopted prior to the expenditure to be reimbursed. The
resolu tion:
~J
(i)
states a general intent to reimburse;
'---)
February 19, 1992
Page 54
"(ii) designates a City official of your choice as the person to declare official
intent with regard to the expenditures; and
(Hi) includes an exhibit describing the expenditures to be reimbursed and
the maximum amount of debt to be issued for such reimbursement.
Please note that in completing Exhibit A, you will need to provide a "general
functional description" of the project to be reimbursed, or identify a fund or account
and its general functional purpose. For example, it will suffice to describe a project
as "streets and roads capital improvement program" or as "parks and recreation
fund-recreational facility capital improvement program."
One further requirement of the rules is that the issuer's declaration of intent may
be relied upon only if it is "reasonable." This means that the reimbursement must
be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances, Le., no other
source of funds are allocated on a long-term basis to pay for the expenditures.
Another factor is whether the issuer has a history of failing to reimburse after
declaring an intent to do so. Therefore, it is not advisable to declare official intent
before making every expenditure; only do so in cases where there is a realistic
expectation (and budgetary need) to bond for the expenditure, and where the
principal amount of bonds can be reasonably estimated.
o
We think that the resolution and forms are self-explanatory (to the degree that these
complex rules can be explained), but if you have any questions be sure to contact
me or any of the bond approving lawyers in our office.
The resolution form sent to you last August (designed to comply with the proposed
regulations), in most cases will comply with the final regulations, though it contains
certain restrictions that are now unnecessary. If your Council adopted the prior
resolution, it may wish to adopt the enclosed, revised resolution to avoid confusion
and undue limitations on your financing plans. If convenient, we would like to
receive a certified copy of the resolution after its adoption,
A final note of caution is in order. If the City made expenditures it expected to
reimburse from bond proceeds and those expenditures were made before
September 8, 1989, or the project financed was placed in service more than a year
ago, it is not possible to finance those expenditures tax-exempt. If you think this
is a problem for your City, please contact us to see what, if anything, can be done
to reimburse those expenditures.
Chartered
~.)
:-J
"
~~
- ')
'J
CITY OF
ANDOVER
, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF
ANDOVER TO REIMB URSE CERTAIN
EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE
ISSUED BY THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Tres Reg. ~ 1.103-18
providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures
will not be deemed spent unless certain. requirements are met; and
WHEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures which may be
financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the
proceeds of a bond; and
WHEREAS, the reimbursement rules apply to bonds issued after March 2, 1992;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANDOVER (THE "CITY") AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City reasonably intends to make expenditures for the project
described in Exhibit A (the "Project"), and reasonably intends to reimburse itself
for such expenditures from the proceeds of debt to be issued by the City in the
maximum principal amount described in Exhibit A.
2. The City Finance Director is authorized to designate appropriate
additions to Exhibit A in circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such
designation shall be reported to the Council at the earliest practicable date and shall
be filed with the official books and records of the City as provided in Section 3.
3. This resolution shall be maintained as part of the books and records of
the City at the main administrative office of the City, and shall be continuously
available during normal business hours of the City on every business day of the
period beginning not more than 30 days after adoption of this resolution and ending
on the last date of issue of any bonds issued to reimburse expenditures described
in Exhibit A.
4. This resolution is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the
City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof.
The anticipated reimbursements set forth at Exhibit A are consistent with the City's
Qudgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of bonds
to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated
. on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City's budget or
financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. .The City has not adopted any
allocation, budget, or restriction of moneys or adoption of a requirement or policy
to reimburse a fund, the primary purpose of which is to prevent moneys from being
available to pay an expenditure the City intends to reimburse with proceeds of a
borrowing.
5. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent
for purposes of Tres. Reg. ~ 1.103-18 and any successor law, regulation, or ruling.
1
~
6. The allocation of proceeds of the bonds to be issue!i to any Project
expenditures described in Exhibit A will be made not later than the later of one year
after the expenditure was paid or one year after the property was placed in service.
7. The Project expenditures described in Exhibit A are capital
expenditures as defined in Tres. Reg. ~ 1.150-1 (h), including costs of issuance of
the bonds to be issued in order to reimburse the Project expenditures.
8. Proceeds of the bonds issued to reimburse the Project expenditures
described in Exhibit A will be deemed spent only when (1) an allocation entry is made
on the books or records of the City with respect to the bonds; (2) the entry
identifies an actual expenditure to be reimbursed, or where the Project is described
as a fund or account, the fund or account from which the expenditure was paid; and
(3) the allocation is effective to relieve the bond proceeds from restrictions on
unspent proceeds under applicable documents and state laws.
9. No entity or entities possess simultaneously two or more of the following
discretionary and non-ministerial powers with respect to the City: power to (1)
remove without cause a controlling portion of the City Council; (2) select, approve,
or disapprove a controlling portion of the City Council; (3) determine the City's
budget or require the use of the City's funds or assets for the other entity's
purpose; or (4) approve, disapprove, or prevent the issuance of debt obligations
of the City.
. 1
\_/
10. None of the proceeds of the bonds issued to reimburse the City for the.
Project expenditures described in Exhibit A will be used within one year of the
allocation (i) to refund another governmental obligation or (ii) to create or increase
the balance in a sinking fund or replace funds used for such purpose, or (ill) to
create or increase the balance in a reserve or replacement fund or replace funds
used for such purposes; or will be used at any time to reimburse any person or
entity (other than the City) for expenditures originally paid with the proceeds of a
City obligation (excluding a City inter-fund borrowing) ; unless (i) such amounts are
deposited in a bona fide debt service fund or are used to pay debt service in the
next one-year period on any City obligation other than the reimbursement bond, or
(ii) the original issue was not reasonably expected to be used to finance the
expenditure.
11. No action or inaction by the City with respect to the allocation of bond
proceeds to reimbursement of Project expenditures will be an artifice or device to
avoid, in whole or in part, arbitrage yield restrictions or arbitrage rebate
requirements.
12. The procedures described in this resolution shall cease to apply to the
extent not required by Tres. Reg. ~ 1.103-18 or any successor law, regulation, or
ruling.
, )
'--.../
2
"
'. >
;,~
~.J
Approved by the City Council of the City of
day of June 1992 .
Attest:
City Clerk - Victoria Volk
Andover
CITY OF ANDOVER
this 16th
"
Mayor - Kenneth D. Orttel
3
')
,--.....
EXHIBIT A
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED June 16, 1992
Da te of
Declaration
Maximum Principal
Amount of Debt
to Reimburse
Proiect Costs
Description of Proiect
June 16, 1992
Hidden Creek East Third Addition $
(Project 1190-5)
Cedar Hills River Estates/Cedar
Crest Estates (Project 1190-14)
Boundry Commission Plat III
(Project #90-17)
CreekviewCrossing (Project #91-2)
Hills of Bunker Lake Fourth Addition
(Project #91-4)
159th Swallow & Quinn Streets
(Project 1191-10)
Hidden Creek East Fourth Addition
(Project #91-25)
Weybridge First and Second Additions
(proj ect 1192-2)
Pinewood Estates Phase I
(Proj ect #92-3)
Winslow Hills Second Addition
(Project 1192-4)
Woodbine Watermain
(Project #92-6)
Pinewood Estates Trunk Sewer Ext.
(proj ect 1192-8)
176th Lane Street Improvement
(proj ect 1192-9)
Pheasant Meadows (Project 1192-10)
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
(~
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
Oak Hollow Street Improvements
(Project #92-12)
fox Meadows Street Improvements
(Project 1192-14)
Hidden Creek East Fifth Addition
(Project 1192-15)
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
June 16, 1992
Meadows of Round Lake
(Project #91-27)
~- )
4
176,650
61,375
40,000
862,228
482,903
125,631
144,293
345,925
794,000
819,592
19,325
197,500
26,975
239,614
90,575
194,390
325,304
1,352,593
@'-""~'
'~\
'\
1"1
, \ r;\}
, ) \--./
-----./ ~;"'~~,,:~,:,~-~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
June 16, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
NO.
',--
Receive May
Financial Statements
REQUEST
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
BY:
Howard D. KoolickID<
Finance Director
The Andover City Council is requested to receive the May 1992
financial statements for the General, Water and Sewer Funds.
please note that these statements include only the expenditures
and receipts that relate to 1992. Expenditures made and revenue
collected in January thru May which relate to 1991 have been
charged to 1991 in accordance with accounting policies.
Should there be any questions about an item, please contact me
prior to the meeting so that I may have adequate time to research
the question.
MOTION BY
TO
'-
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
.-,............-..,....,.,-"-..-~-----...---~,...'_...--..,.........,,.---------~ .....
"
"
,
4
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS
As of 3 1r~ay92
"
....
.'
.. -------~--G~E-N-I:-R-.AT--F U --N D
REVENUES
-----------------------
-----------------------
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS
.! ---- NON "'13 USTNESS-LTCENS E S-&-P E RMI TS
'I Building Related
I Other
---- INTERGOVERNMENTAL:-REVENUE
i CHARGES FOR SERVICES
i Street Lighting
IU~_ __not ner~-----------------
I COURT FINES
; SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
1------MISi~i;~~~~U~:~~~~NUE-.u---.- ---..
1 Refunds and Reimbursements
"', \---Other--- --'-- --'----______u m__ ---
., JTRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS
From Admin. Trust Fund
.!------FromIIF--l-=1-F.und----c---- --
! From TIF 1-2 Fund
Revised
Budget
-....-------------
1,113,714.00
20,325.00
232,723.00
6,250.00
644,326.00
56,900.00
23,300.00
40,000.00
1,000.00
54,600.00
25,000.00
. --3 , 1 00 . 00 .
63,300.00
----24 i 000.00
6,000.00
t~-------.- - -,-,_..~~--.--- -.-~-"'-. ---
I TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2~:~~~::~~~~_
I ------------'
,
1--- ..--. .------.----.--.---,.-~-----~------ - ~ - ---
,
I
'i-~....-h---..---- -.----.-------..-- .-- .... .... -
-I
. .l___________-...,--.______~__~__._.____.___._.__
I
i
I
I___.._~--------------.
:I
,
: ,J
Year to Date Percentage
Actual Remaining
..... - ----- -- ---~----~-----.---.._--~
-------------- ----------
-'
8,207.58 99
3,309.65 83
154,301.50
2,681.56
'83,323;50--'
33
57
.-- 87-
16,918.54 70
..18,885;37-----18----
12,467.31 68
12.00- 98
11,525.19 78
3,211.79 87
.- 10,961-;-7 0---'(253 )----~-
100
'---'-1-0 Q----
100
325,880.69 85
------------
------------
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER
As of 31May92
FUNDS
Revised
Budget
Year to Date
Actual
Percentage
Remaining
I
'; r-- ..-....-- .__m._...._ -. ..... .-- .---- ...---
l~:~-. .~j"~.~:t ~-X ~.~:~. ~.~, ~ ....:. :... ..._-~-_:._-:--_.. -~
.:,.,' CITYCOUNCIL 34,802.00 13,266.43 61
. NEWSLETTER . 4,771.00 1,713.95 64
r- ~~~.~~ I ;~-~~----."-- m'_ - ..... 11;': ;~ ~ : ~ ~ .-.; :~ ~ ;:'~ ~ ---~6'---~~--
"1 ADMINISTRATION 1011,359.00 59,768.65' 42
.!--...,-.'FINANCTAL----,A:OMINISTRATrDtr--- 93,278.00 39,103';88---5'8--
.1 AUDITING 10,000.00 10,497.75 (11)
I ASSESSING 38,289.00 39,047.00 (1)
r--;I~~~~~~ AN;-~ONIt~~H .---- ;~: ~~~: ~~. -- "';~': ~~~':-~~-~---~r
.L_'_~-r.ATTAy_..'HP~t:C':BSSUII~~:uGT''''''______''_ _ 21,248.00 7,083.90 66
I ".I. ML. L. "" 44,663.00' "20','796-;'16 -S'3.-.~-..~
I FIRE STATION BUILDING 33,700.00 14,503.48 56
I ,PUBL1:CWORKS BUILDING 22,932.00 10,670.52 53
'--, STNrOlrCITI7EN'15""\::ENTER-'~ .--. -..... . 8,456.00 -2;911';36---OS"
'.1 .J E QUI PM E N T B U IL DIN G 3 , 0 7 7 . 0 0 54 7 . 3 1 8 2
'. EN GIN E E R IN G 68 , 1 7 6 . 00 23 , 5 73 . 02 65
1--~~~~~6~~~r~oW''-'--------'----~~~: ;i~: gg -- --'1 ~;:z~z~~r--';~-'-------c
......... RESCUE SERVICE> .......... 35,972.00 9,016.15 74
~P'R"nn:CTI\lrHJ!rPEmON'------'-----"-'--126, 7 97. 00.----5'3';-164"-;-'('5- 5'8
CIVIL DEFENSE 2,300.00 724.50 68
ANIMAL CONTROL 10,235.00 . 4,047.30 60
~STREETS"ANo-HTGHWA,{S---'--' ------1 8 2~5 6 8 . 0 0----.--ol.;6TT-;-8~-6 s--
SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL 121,918.00 33,629.43 72
STORM SEWERS 23,257.00 8,547.86 63
--STREtiCTGHTING-------.- 14';1150 :00- --.u..-5;-23T~.gu_-----oT--
I STREET SIGNS 31,637.00 5,693.07 82
I TRAFFIC SIGNALS 10,680.00 2,129.02 60
i- STREErTTGHTS"'BTITED:--:- ..--..- - 42,264.00 --'---14' ;902;.22----64--.
I PARK AND RECREATION 229,426.00 53,242.60 76
TREES AND WEED CONTROL 9,668.00 3,533.82 63
;---r::ECYClJ:NG"-'~~~-"-~ ---------- .... .... 36, ell; 00' .. 1'2';44T:-06--" 66--
I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 17,994.00 6,624.48 63
: UNALLOCATED 81,022.00 27,454.00 66
:--'-.IMPR1JVEMENT- P ROJECTS---'--"" --._-... .---,-----.-.--..-- .-----
I OTHER FINANCING USES n:~~~~:~~~_ __~~~::~~~~_ 68
.I~------- ..-----~-----.-- .....
! ,) TOTAL. GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2 ::~1::::~:~~=
r----------------
L
-'
770,246.09
66
------------
------------
~.:._._..~_..__~._..... __ _.__._w... _ ._.__ __..._._,__.__ ~....___ __._. +_._ _~_._._______________~_~.................___~____......._...____
,
.
;
.;r---'
.',
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER
As of 31May92
,I
'I
n
\
)
T------~-- -. ----- -- "-
:1
'1------_0_-
'1
.I-.~~-------------'-.-'--~---""-"'"-~-~-- ~_._--.--,.- --...
-'I
:1
~ i
"
W ATE R FUN D
REV E N U E S
___:__-o-4';~______=='==="=-'== ;:_::: ::"=== == = = =
I ' WATER SALES. ._
'--:--METER-SA[ES-~--~-- -.. __-0'__- --- .
I PERMIT FEES
,II MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
:: -------c--~~_.~.~----.-.:.,"-:..... :;': ---~.=--- ._--~
:Il
TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUE
:;,
I
'-:1------------------
i
'I.___u______
,
'j
I
j-----..- ..----------
)
I
. ,i
1_____- _--...;._________...:...-.-:.-~.___________......___..___._~~__,. ___
1 '. )
o \
:I_~____-;---u----
'1__
Revised
Budget
191,186.00
20;000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
. --
------------
233,186.00
------------
------------
76,595.00
101,318.00
55,273.00
233;186.00'
------------
------------
FUNDS
Year to Date
Actual
Percentage
Remaining
37,390.22 80
---20-;570:00 ------(2)----
8,450.00 15
8,094.94 32
-...-- _.-_._----------------.-~
------------
74,505.16 68
-..-.--.,.-... - - -~--------'------
------------
------------
7,641.27 90
40,336.59 60
--- 0-16;869;-96--69
------------
------------
64U, 847 ;82------72---~0
I
II
, I
'j CITY
.' YEAR TO
,
w)~ . =_~_~~-_--~~GENE~A~;
:1
I
i ,.-----;-..-------..---.------.- ~--...
il
r
:1 SEWER CHARGES
,'---"-' tNrERESf~--~---_.- ------
~I REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
'. TRANSFER FROM SEWER CONN. FUND
. I ._____.__._
I
1~-~ TOT AL~"'~"i:ND:EVEN UE
. :.--- -----.----,------S--E-.W--E-R--F.. U'N"- D -
.1
.';1 EX PEN S E S
.....1
r~.J.
'I COLLECTION
- I. Me"'t-ro~5<:n-i't'ah-Wi:"i!;~te-COntrc> 1
i Other Expenses
.~ ADMINISTRATION
1-'-- --.- ~- --"~~.------ .~.--------..,--- -..- -...
I TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES
!------_..__.~-_.__..- .~.~--~-~- ---.-"-- -_.
I
I
SEW E R FUN D
REV E N U E S
-------------------
-------------------
--------------------
--------------------
r' .---- ---- -----
I
'j
I-------.__.~_._--- - ------.----------...
. , '\
! 'J
\-------.-----______._ .___ ________._____..u..
. ,
i
I
i
OF ANDOVER
DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
WATER AND SEWER
of 31May92
Revised
Budget
FUNDS
Year to Date
Actual
Percentage
Remaining
..- ._. .._....._..._-..~
--------------
396,300.00 96,121.14 75
. 2,000.00 --.-- .. --2 ,114-;-3S----"{5')-------
398,300.00
------------
------------
248,242.00 --
67,480.00
82,578.00
-... - .--
------------
398,300.00
------------
------------
.--.---.-...--.-.---- -----'~._--_._--~
------------
98,235.49
75
------------
------------
--124.T22~00----49
6,291.18 90
12,238.54 85
142,651.72
61!
. ....- -.. ...... ..- --------..---."------,-- -.--------
------------
------------
-.-.------ ..-. -..--...----.-.---r--~---
@\~<
'~t-.
. \ r;\)
. . ~- .-}
......../ ".~.':-::<M""';.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ,111"" 1 (:.
1QQ?
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
APPR01(E FOR
A G T: : ~ :---.....
(~ ./
BY: / J
j
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
.::17.
Adopt Resolution/PIR
Budget and Expendi tures BY:
Howard D. Koolick ~
Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution amending the PIR Fund budget and authorizing
expenditures from the PIR Fund for those items included in the
amended budget.
BACKGROUND
Over the last several months, the City Council has approved the
refurbishing of Fire Truck 4881 in an amount greater than budgeted
and the purchase of Accu-vote equipment which was not budgeted.
This resolution amends the PIR fund budget for these two items.
/ -,
The resolution also authorizes the expenditure for the budgeted
items. Under the resolution establishing the PIR fund, all
expenditures need City Council approval. This resolution, if
adopted by a 4/5ths majority, would constitute City Council's
approval.
\.~
In the past, City Council has adopted a resolution for each
expenditure. This practice has been difficult to administer since
some items, such as the City Hall garage, are composed of a number
of invoices, each of which would require City Council approval.
In addition, this practice is time-consuming for the Finance
Department since for each expenditure, a resolution must be
written and presented to City Council. Adoption of the resolution
will make the operation of the PIR Fund easier and more efficient.
please remember that this resolution, should you choose to adopt
it, requires a 4/5ths majority to authorize the expenditures
shown. Any expenditures above the approved amounts would still be
presented to City Council for approval.
I would recommend that the resolution be adopted. please direct
any questions or comments to me prior to the meeting if possible.'
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'; TO
SECOND BY
'--
~ ----
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
\
~~
RES. NO. R -92
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING
FUND BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE FOR BUDGETED ITEMS IN
AMOUNTS NOT TO EXCEED BUDGETED AMOUNTS.
WHEREAS, Resolution Number R174-90 established a Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund containing a Capital Improvement
Account designed to fund capital expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted, and subsequently
amended, a budget for the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund;
and
WHEREAS, the city Council has approved certain expenditures
to be financed out of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund's
Capital Improvement Account without amending the budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby amends the 1992 Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund Budget as follows:
~
\J
Refurbishing of Truck 4881
Purchase of Accu-Votes
Old
Budget
$ 35,000
-0-
New
Budget
$ 48,798
$ 10,248
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Andover hereby authorizes expenditures for the following items in
amounts not to exceed the amount shown.
Refurbishing of Truck 4881
Construction of Garage at City Hall
voting Booths
Accu-Vote Voting Machines
Fire Department Small Equipment
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
$ 48,798
$ 22,000
$ 11,298
$ 10,248
$ 4,274
and adopted by the
City Council on this 16th day of
June ,1992 with
Councilmembers
voting in favor and Councilmembers
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~~.
~
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
VOLUNTEERS NEEDED FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION DAY
There will be a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day on
saturday, July 25, from 9 A.M. to 4 P.M. at the Anoka County Fair
Grounds.
The targeted Anoka County Cities for this collection are Andover,
Ramsey, and Anoka. We will all be asking for volunteers from our
cities for help. Over 100 volunteers will be needed for the day.
I plan to ask some businesses and also community groups too.
If anyone on the Council can help, please let me know. The
hours break-down for help are: 8 - 12; 12 - 4; and 4 - 8( for
clean-up) .
I really hope that Andover will be able to show a good turnout of
support.
~~
~
t-:-- ---.!.... .
-/ D C c.: .
~ffz-
~ ~n![tg Enginm'
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Inc.
1801 Old Highway 8, Suite 114
St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A. 55112
Telephone: (612) 639-0913
Fax: (612) 639-0923
TRANSMITIAL TO:
The Honorable Kenneth Orttel
REFERENCE NO.: 1472-90
Mayor of Andover
DATE: Tune 30, 1992
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
For Review and Comment
-L As Requested
For Your Information
Andover, Minnesota 55303
RE: Landfill Gas Information
Item Date Description
1 Copy of Section 4.4.5 of the Remedial Investigation
Report for the WOE Sanitary Landfill
COMMENTS:
This information was earlier published in the Remedial Investigation Report back in 1985. A
copy is enclosed for you use.
COpy TO: WOE Group
FROM:
Alan Van Norman
The absence of volatile compounds and
chlorinated compounds indicates that large volumes of runoff
contaminated with industrial waste did not cross over these
lands.
4.4.5. Soil Gas
All sanitary landfills produce gas as a
result of anaerobic decomposition of organic wastes. There
are three basic processes by which landfilled organic wastes
are decomposed - physical, chemical and biological. Although
the three processes are interdependent, biological
decomposition is primarily responsible for landfill gas
generation.
Typical landfill gas is approximately 45 to
50 percent methane: 45 to 50 percent carbon dioxide, with
traces of nitrogen: hydrogen: oxygen and assorted other less
common gases and vapors. Typical compositions of extracted
landfill gas at three sanitary landfills are presented in
Table 4.12.
Eleven soil gas probe monitoring locations
were constructed on the site. The gas probe locations are
presented on Figure 1.3. A summary of the gas probe
construction is presented on Table 4.l3.
112
TABLE 4.12
TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF EXTRACTED LANDFILL GAS*
(% by volume)
Landfill Site
CO2
O2
N2
CH4
l. Torance, California
25.5
33.9
0.7
1.0
1
60.3
9.1
21
13.5
55.8
44
2. Industry, California
3. Mountain View, California 34
l. R. Stone, Methane Reclaimed from an Old Landfill, Public Works,
May 1974, 70
2. R.P. Stearns, T. D. Wright and M. Brecher, Recovery and
Utilization of Methane Gas from a Sanitary Landfill - City of
Industry California, s.e.s. Engineering, Long Beach, California,
1978
3. J.A. Carlson, Recovery of Landfill Gas at Mountain View -
Enqineerinq Site Study, u.s. Environmental Protection Agency,
SW-587d, 1977.
6'10- ..
.
o'
I
~
500'
r
---- PROPERTY LINE
-.- LIMIT OF REFUSE DISPOSAL
LEGEND
eW-4
'.W-II&*
W'III*
W-III. w-cu
W-IIC
e - OBSERVATION WELL/BOREHOLE
..-, W-1I1 . w-s
. ~W-lIC
.-110 W'IIA
.--..,. W-15A*
.-10..__ '__ .
/ '--...
. W:SZ~* \ 1
,/ 'W32I* I' \
\~:~
e* - OBSERVATION WELL INSTALLED
AS PART OF CURRENT RI/FS
GAS PROBE
'.~I-OZ
" . '1-04
. I-as
"\ . I-OS. .
\'..... .-Ie I
'",
'-'-'"]
i
I
I
...,-e4r ~ W-llA* ~
W-15C ;;:
.-151 _.
W-',5A \ . .-27A* ~
\. 'W-SlA* · W-5O..* ~
I \ ~
r-I~ \6_e4
W-I:5&4" . ~
W'29*'_._ .-14_W-140* -:-11 ~
-........... W-14I* .
I PI-M.' '"" _'
I ......e4., . .--' W-17.t~'-M
'-'-'--'- --"
.-..... ~-
.. ~
...-..e=b
'V,
, (
,......
','
"
"
\\
. \ \
\ \
"
\\ /
"
,~, /'
" . .33:*.._.
. .' *.-Z4....~", W.53,1% "W-22&*
aP'-I" """'7 -
." e ..
/ ", eW-I
','
*_-101"',
*-'20& '~.::
eRA
1472-71 01/03/..
.W-I"'*
AGP"e4
P-II
'.
\\
\,
I'
"
~,
\\
,\
"
\\
\\
II
--~
II
I
I
L__
~
~I
~I
,
I
i
fIgure 1.3
SITE PLAN
WOE, Andover, Minnesota
"
TABLE 4.13
SUMMARY OF GAS PROBE CONSTRUCTION
Gas Probe
Description
Depth
(Feet)
1 3/4"~ installed by Hickok *
2 3/4"~ installed by Hickok *
3a 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/l4/84 18
3b l/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/14/84 10
4 l/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/l4/84 6
5 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/14/84 l2
6a 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/l4/84 22
6b 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 9/14/84 l3
7a 1/2"~ installed by CRA - lO/3/84 19
7b 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 10/3/84 9.5
8 1/2"~ installed by CRA - 10/3/84 lO
9 3/4"~ installed by CRA - l/l6/86 13.7
10 3/4"~ installed by CRA - l/16/86 13.8
Notes: 1) * Depth could not be determined due to internal
blockage
Combustible gas measurements obtained in the
field with a model H, Bacharch portable combustible gas
meter, are presented on Table 4.14. The results indicate
that combustible gas generation is occurring within the
landfill and that landfill gas migration is occurring. The
values measured cover the full range of expected combustible
gas content by volume.
During the second round sample collection gas
samples were collected at GP-l, GP-3, GP-4, GP-S, GP-6B, and
GP-8 for analyses of organic vapours. The samples were
collected on activated charcoal tubes using battery operated
sampling pumps. An average total air volume of lOa litres
was collected at each sampling location.
The samples were analyzed by Pace
Laboratories Inc. for each of the parameters on the Minnesota
Department of Health Volatile Organics List No. 465B in
accordance with NIOSH physical and chemical analytical method
No. l27. The samples were desorbed using carbon disulfide
and analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame ionization
detector.
. .
F
The results are presented in Appendix t. The
results indicate that several volatile organic compou~ds were
fl
ti
I
detected at all locations measured except GP-8.
L_
113
TABLE 4. l4
COMBUSTIBLE GAS MEASUREMENTS
(% by volume)
September 18, October I, October 17, February lO,
Gas Probe. 1984 1984 1984 1986
1 10% 2l% 25% 5%
2 0% 0% 0% 0%
3a <.4% 0% <l% 0%
3b 0% 0% 0% Trace
4 59% .57% 19% 8%
5 0% 0% 0% Trace
6a 35% 49% 55% 30%
6b 36% 52% 45% 15%
7a --* 0% 0%
7b 0% 0%
8 0% 0
9 --* --* --* Trace
10 --* --* --* Trace
Notes: l) * Gas probes were not yet installed.
...,
The occurrence of these compounds within the
soil gas is consistent with their presence in waste substance,
within the limit of refuse disposal. The absence of volatile
organic compounds at locations GP-8 is simply due to the fact
that GP-8 is farther away from the limit of refuse disposal.
No current risk is presented to the
surrounding residential homes. The nearest homes are
approximately 500 feet southwest of disposed waste. Ponded
water between the waste and these homes provides a barrier to
soil gas migration.
The next nearest homes are over 1,000 feet
west of the site. A distance sufficiently large to provide
protection to these homes from the effects landfill gas
migration.
Coon Creek provides a barrier to landfill gas
migration on the north side of the site.
The land east of the site, across Hanson
Boulevard is presently undeveloped.
Gas monitoring should continue at the gas,
monitoring probes and at the additional locations, GP9 and
1 ~
L
GPlO, further from the fill area during conditions which
promote horizontal gas migration (e.g., during winter frost
and snow cover).
114
"'~I .
Air Concentrations, ppm
PACE Sample Number: 5020 5019 5018 5017 5016 5021 5022
Gas Probe Number: GP-l GP-3 GP-4 GP-5 GP-6 GP-8 Blank
Chloromethane NO NO NO ' NO NO NO NO
Bromomethane NO ~lD NO ~m NO NO ~JD
'Oichlorodofluoromethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Vinyl Chloride NO NO ~lD NO ~m NO NO
Chloroethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Methylene Chloride 0.07 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Acetone 0.02 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Trichlorofluoromethane NO ~lD NO NO ~m NO 1m
Allyl Chloride NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
l,l-Oichloroethylene NO NO NO IW NO NO NO
Tetrahydrofuran 0.17 0.02 0.03 0.01 lID NO 1m
l,l-Oichloroethane' NO NO NO 1m 0.17 IJO NO
Trans-l,2-0ichloroethylene NO NO ~m IJD 0.58 NO NO
CiS-l,2-oichlyroetnYlene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ethyl Ether( 1 NO NO NO 0.16 NO NO lID
Chlorofonn NO NO NO NO NO lID NO
1,1,2-Trichloro-l,2{2-Trifluoroethane 0.76 1.30 NO 0.03 NO NO NO
Methyl Ethyl Keton? 1) NO 0.10 ~lD 0.16 NO NO NO
1,2-0ichloroethane 1) NO 0.07 NO 0.12 NO NO NO
Oibromomethane NO NO NO NO 1m NO 'NO
l,l,l-Trichloroethane NO NO NO NO 0.14 rw NO
Carbon Tetrachloride NO 1m NO NO NO NO' NO
Bromodichloromethane NO NO ~lD NO NO NO 1m
Oichloroacetonitrile NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
2,3-0ichloro-l-Propene NO NO NO ~m NO NO NO
1,2-0ichloropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
' .
L
~ .
L
Air Concentrations, ppm
PACE Sample Number: 5020 5019 5018 5017 . 5016 . 5021 5022
Gas Probe Number: GP-l GP-3. GP-4 GP-5 GP-6 GP-8 Blank
1,1-Oichloro-l-Propene(2) 0.47 NO 0.74 NO tJD tJD NO
Trans-l,3-0ichloro-l-Propene(2) 0.47 NO 0.74 NO NO NO NO
1,1,2-Tri1hloroethylene NO NO NO tJD 0.31 NO tJD
Benzene(3 1.58 NO 2.47 NO 1.46 NO NO
1,3-0ichloropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
oOioromochloromethane(3) 0.59 NO 0.93 NO 0.55 NO NO
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0~92 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Cis-l,3-0ichloro-l-Propene(3) NO NO 1.74 NO 1.02 NO tJD
1,2-0ibromoethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
2-Chl oroethyl vinyl ether NO NO tJD NO NO NO NO
Bromofonn NO NO NO 140 NO NO NO
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO NO tJD t40 NO NO NO
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.28 NO NO NO 0.37 NO NO
1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.77 NO 4.57 0.54 54.5 NO NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene NO NO NO NO NO IJD NO
Pentachloroethane tJD NO NO NO NO NO NO
Toluene 0.73 0.48 0.36 0.08 9.52 NO NO
Chlorobenzene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ethyl benzene 0.27 NO 0.08 NO 0.02 NO NO
Cumene 0.49 NO 0.18 NO 1.41 NO NO
m-Xylene 0.34 NO 0.09 NO 0.56 NO NO
p-Xylene(4) NO NO 0.06 NO 0.81 NO NO
o-Xylene(4) NO NO 0.06 NO 0.81 NO NO
~:o::o~~~ NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Results are in parts per million (ppm).
The method detection limit is 1 microgram per sample.
"NO" means none detected.
Compounds with the same number in parentheses co-elute and could not be
quantified separately by the method employed.
These parameters correspond to Minnesota Oepartment of Health Method No. 465 B
for Volatile Organics.
14 and 20 unidentified peaks were found in samples 5016 and 5018,
respectively.
Air Concentrations, ppm
PACE Sample Number: 5020 5019 5018 5017 5016 5021 5022
Gas Probe Number: GP-1 GP-3 GP-4 GP-5 GP-6 GP-8 Blank
Chloromethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Bromomethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Oich1orodof1uoromethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Vinyl Chloride NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ch1oroethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Methylene Chloride 0.07 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Acetone 0.02 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Trich1orof1uoromethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Allyl Chloride NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
1,1-0ich1oroethy1ene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Tetrahydrofuran 0.17 0.02. 0.03 0.01 NO NO NO
1,1-0ich1oroethane NO NO NO NO 0.17 NO NO
Trans-1,2-0ich1oroethy1ene NO NO NO NO 0.58 NO NO
CiS-l,2-0ich1~roethYlene ND NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ethyl Ether(1 NO NO NO 0.16 NO NO NO
Chlorofonn NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
l,l,2-Trich1orO-l,2(2)Trifluoroethane 0.76 1.30 NO 0.03 NO NO NO
Methyl Ethyl Keton? 1 NO 0.10 NO 0.16 NO NO NO
l,2-0ich1oroethane 1) NO 0.07 NO 0.12 NO NO NO
Oibromomethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
1,l,l-Trich1oroethane NO NO NO NO 0.14 NO NO
Carbon Tetrachloride NO 1m NO NO NO NO NO
Bromodichloromethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Oichloroacetonitri1e NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
2,3-0ichloro-1-Propene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
1,2-0ich1oropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
.
'1.-
. (~ .
X ...r.
\,
Air Concentrations, ppm
PACE Sample Number: 5020' 5019 5018 5017 5016 5021 5022
Gas Probe Number: GP-l GP-3 GP-4 GP-5 GP-6 GP-8 Blank
.-
l,l-Oichloro-l-Propene(2) 0.47 NO 0.74 NO NO NO NO
Trans-l,3-0ichloro-l-Propene(2) 0.47 NO 0.74 NO NO NO NO
l,l,2-Tri~hlOroethYlene NO NO NO NO 0.31 NO NO
Benzene(3 1.58 NO 2.47 NO 1.46 NO NO
l,3-0ichloropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Oibromochloromethane(3) 0.59 NO 0.93 NO 0.55 . NO NO
l,l,2-Trichloroethane 0.92 NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ci s-l ,3-0ichl oro-l-Propene (3) NO NO 1.74 NO 1.02 NO NO
l,2-0ibromoethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Bromofonn NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
l,l,l,2-Tetrachloroethane NO. NO NO NO NO NO NO
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.28 NO NO NO 0.37 NO NO
l,2,3-Trichloropropane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.77 NO 4.57 0.54 54.5 NO NO
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Pentachloroethane NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Toluene 0.73. 0.48 0.36 0.08 9.52 NO NO
Chlorobenzene NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Ethyl benzene 0.27 NO 0.08 NO 0.02 NO NO
Cumene 0.49 NO 0.18 NO 1.41 NO NO
m-Xylene .0.34 NO 0.09 NO 0.56 NO NO
p-Xyl ene (4) NO NO 0.06 NO 0.81 NO NO
o-Xyl ene (4) NO NO 0.06 NO 0.81 NO NO
Oichlorobenzenes NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Notes to Table I:
Results are in parts per million (ppm).
The method detection limit is 1 microgram per sample.
"NO" means none detected.
Compounds with the same number in parentheses co-elute and could not be
quantified separately by the method employed.
These parameters correspond to MinnesotaOepartment of Health Method No. 465 B
for Volatile Organics.
14 and 20 unidentified peaks were found in samples 5016 and 5018,
respectively.
- :'"
" ...../:;.,.. .
. ,:':" "', .:?:.~:/<.~:' ~\.
)~ t;;' .~\}~~:-
?, I,;. - .. ,-;-';:
.~ ' . .. ;-...
\~ ~ .}:~_. ,. .~,#;~/ .
~..' t:~. -,r.'-"\j.:'~:~:- -;.
,': ~~::. ....~\:.:,:"
1'"' --'!-
.. r'--' ...:'
~
.;
CITY OF ANDOVER-
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE'
July T, 1992
ITEM
NO.
Joint Powers Agreement
With Anoka County
BY:
Jim
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Add-On
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The City Council is requested to consider the-attached Joint
Powers Agreement with Anoka County_ for. Project_ 92-5, ~59th
Avenue NW, County state Highway No. T and.: County Road: No~ 58. ~
Note: Page 2, Item II. METHOD
The lot south of the relocation will not be non-conforming
and will meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements for
Neighborhoo~ Business District.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY.
~
-_~';'
Contract No.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR THE RECONSTRUCIlON OF
THE INTERSECfION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO.7,
159TH AVENUE NORTHWEST, AND COUNTY ROAD NO. 58
Project No. 91-02-58
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of
1992, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 325
East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of
Andover, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Northwest, Andover, Minnesota 55304, hereinafter referred to
as the "City."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have long exhibited concern for the alignment of
County Road (CR) No. 58 at County State Aid Highway (CSAH) No.7, as well as Fox Street; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement consider it mutually desirable to remove the old
segment of CR No. 58 from the County system; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement agree that Old CR No. 58 should be returned to
the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Highway Department has prepared plans and specifications
for Project No. 91-02-58 which plans and specifications are dated June 17, 1992, and which are on
file in the office of the County Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be
shared; and
WHEREAS, together with the sharing of the cost of construction for the roadway, the city
will incorporate miscellaneous utility work to be covered by this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. ~ 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions of the state to enter into
joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each.
or' #,
NOW, TIIEREFORE, it is mutually stipulated and agreed as follows:
I. PURPOSE:
The parties have jointed together for the purpose of reconstructing the intersection
as described in the plans and specifications numbered 91-02-58 on file in the office of the Anoka
County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference.
II. METIIOD:
The County shall provide all engineering services and shall cause the construction of
Anoka County Project No. 91-02-58 in conformance with said plans and specifications. The calling
for all bids and the acceptance of all bid proposals shall be done by the County.
The City shall not cause the property south of the new alignment to become a
nonconforming use because of the donation of right-of-way to the County.
ill. COSTS:
A The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of
all labor, materials, normal engineering costs, and equipment rental required to complete the work,
shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated costs"
are good faith projections of the costs which will be incurred for this project. Actual costs may vary
and those will be the costs for which the City will be responsible.
B. The estimated cost of the total project is $285,709.67. Participation in the
construction costs is as follows:
1. The City will pay to the County 100% of the cost of construction of
Fox Street and 159th Avenue, and 50% of the cost of work on Old CR No. 58. The estimated cost
of the City share is $23,786.50.
2. Any in-place driveway pavement disrupted by the construction will be
replaced in kind by the County at no cost to the City.
C. The total estimated cost to the City for the project is $23,799.69. The City
participation in engineering will be at a rate of 8% of their designated share. The estimated cost to
the City for engineering is $1,902.92. Total estimated City cost of the project is $25,689.41.
- 2 -
D. Upon final completion of the construction the City shall pay to the County,
upon written demand by the County, its portion of the construction costs of the project estimated at
$25,689.41. The City's share of the cost of the project shall include only construction and engineering
expense and does not include administrative expenses incurred by the County.
IV. lERM:
This Agreement shall continue until (1) terminated as provided hereinafter, or (2)
until the construction provided for herein is completed and payment provided for herein is made,
whichever of (1) or (2) shall first occur.
v. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS:
All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be
disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law.
VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES:
All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by
Anoka in conformance to state laws.
VII. STIUCT ACCOUNTABILITY:
A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and
disbursements shall be made upon request by either party.
VITI. lERMINATION:
This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without cause,
upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other party.
If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two (2) days after mailing. Such
termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of services
or goods which occurred prior to such notice of termination. The City shall pay its pro-rata share
of costs which the County incurred prior to such notice of termination.
IX. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION:
In accordance with the County's Affirmative Action Policy and the County
Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded from full-time
- 3 -
-'
employment rights in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the
program which is the subject of this Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital status,
public assistance status, age, disability or national origin.
X. MAIN1ENANCE
Maintenance of completed Fox Street, 159th Avenue Northwest, and old CR No. 58
will be the sole obligation of the City.
XI. NOTICE:
For purpose of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shaIl be effective if
delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota
55303, on behalf of the County, and the City Administrator of Andover, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Northwest, Andover, Minnesota 55304, on behalf of the City.
XII. INDEMNIFICATION:
The City and the County mutuaIly agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other
from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the
respective officers, agents or employees relating to activity conducted by either party under this
Agreement.
xm. ENTIRE AGREEMENTIREQUIREMENT OF A WRITING:
It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as weIl as any previous agreement presently in effect
between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations or
modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced
to writing and duly signed by the parties herein.
- 4 _
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on
the dates written below.
COUNlY OF ANOKA
CITY OF ANDOVER
By:
Dan Erhart, Chairman
. County Board of Commissioners
By:
Name:
Dated:
Title:
Dated:
ATIEST
By:
John "Jay" McLinden
County Administrator
By:
Name:
Dated:
Title:
Dated:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By:
Paul K Ruud
County Engineer
By:
Name:
Dated:
Title: City Engineer
Dated:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
Dan Klint
Assistant County Attorney
By:
Name:
Dated:
Title: City Attorney
Dated:
dk\contract\andover.jpa
- 5 -
'.
EXHIBIT A
COST-SHARING AGREEMENT
FOR PROJECTS CONSTRUCfED IN ANOKA COUNlY
USING COUN'IY STATE AID FUNDS OR LOCAL TAX LEVY DOLLARS
Items
Bikeways
Concrete Curb & Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk .
Concrete Sidewalk Replacement
Concrete Curb & Gutter for Median
Construction
Concrete Median
Construction or Adjustment of Local
Utilities
Grading, Base & Bituminous
Storm Sewer
County Share
o
50%
o
100%
City Share
100%
50%
100%
o
100%
100%
o
0*1
o
100%
Based on State
Aid Letter*2
100%
o
Based on State
Aid Letter*2
Traffic Signals (communities larger
than 5,(00)
1(2 of the cost of its
legs of the intersection
the cost of its legs of
the intersection plus 1(2
the cost of the County
legs of the intersection
Traffic Signal (communities less
than 5,(00)
Engineering Services
Right-of-Way
100%
*4
0*3
*4
0*5
100%
d
The County pays for 100% of a Standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a
community requests decorative median such as red brick, stamped concrete, or exposed
aggregate concrete the City will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard median.
In the event no State Aid is being used, drainage cost shares will be computed by proportions
of total area to County area where the area of the road right-of-way is doubled prior to
performance of the calculations.
In communities less than 5,000 people the County pays for 100% of the cost of the traffic
signal effective March 1986. The County collects on behalf of the cities (less than 5,(00)
"Municipal State Aid Dollars" since they do not themselves qualify for state aid funds. These
funds are used to pay the City Share.
Engineering shall be paid by the Lead Agency except that any participating agency will pay
construction engineering in the amount of 8% of the construction costs paid by that agency.
In the event that the City requests purchase of right-of-way in excess of those right-of-ways
required by County construction, the City participates to .the extent an agreement can be
reached in these properties. For instance, a City may request a sidewalk be constructed
, alongside a County roadway which would require additional right-of-way, in which case the
City may pay for that portion of the right-of-way. Acquisition of right-of-way for new
alignments shall be the responsibility of the CityfTownship requesting the alignment. In
addition, any costs including right-of-way costs incurred by the County because a
CityfTownship did not acquire sufficient right-of-way during the platting process or on new
alignments shall be paid by the CityfTownship.
*2
*3
.4
*5
dk/contractlexhibitCm
<;(1
+
-""
-.s::
Y..
lil
~
-
~
~
~
-
L'
=
~
-
~
~
-
~
~
-
;;
~
:::
::;
~
- ~
~.;
--
~~
- ~
=~
- -
- ~
~-
~~
~ ~
--
~ -
~~
~~
~--::c:
~ 'J
,
.
,
,
.
l~t
,- .
I...... It
.......1<::1 I
~'.... :
~ .
::: :
= - .
~-:
=
-
~
~+
-
=
~
:::
=
=
=
~
~
-
~
-S
-
~
:0:
:::
~
=-
=
~
~
-+
,
,
.
~.:.
~-
=
~~
:=
-
'J
~-
=
- =
0:....;;
-
;.:::
~
"<i1 ,.. lU en
-
=
~
-
:::
..
~..
-l
~ r""::
";..;,,;..,;";.,;~..,;r:"';"';C:::"';"';"';";"';"';"';"';";"';~";";"';~k;"';"';:"';"';"';. -i 1..:::
-----~~-~~---~-~-- -- a---E[-- -- ~j
- - 1-'--"
--- ------~ --==1 == ===i'~.~--l~
~-------~--------------~- ~:
~-------'--------~~---~-~- -"
------.-: -- · !:t::dddd.dd.d~r::~d:~::[: l~~
----:--- ---=- -- -- ----- -- --l-~ --~.~-r--
_ c::II _1_ - ...... - _ _ _ ...... -=- c::> _ _ _ co _ <=> _ -=- _ c:o c::o c::o <=> c:o!_ c:o c:o _ -=- c:o ,_ _ _ =- _ c:o c:o c:o _ _ _ 1-'
::;:; ::;1:;:;:;:;::::::;:;:;: :;1:::::::;:;::; :;1::;:;::;:; :;1:;:; ::1:;:; :;1,':;:; :;;,:;:;:;:; ~ ~I:::::: I:::
.-- en .-- ...... 0.0 Old - CO ..... ...... en...... c:o ("001 _I..... c:o ...... - _ .... ...... -.-- - ..... -1_ .... _ c:o ..... c::o _ _ ..... .,.,......... en..... Old _ i-""
=:~:=~~2~~~=;~=~~~1-2~12 ~f= t~=~~~;f~~: =2~t==I~= ~
~ - ~ ~ - ~ - - -1- - ~ - -::::: - - - - - - -I::: - - ~ ~ - - - - - - :;: - - - - - ~ ,-
.; -=5~~~;; ~= ~==C~=C =c ~ -~: :;:';:=f=
-co c::>C:O-......-c:oCllc:o......c::o__-_
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~.~~~'~- ~:
:::
-===== :::: === =:- =: ~ =-:= = =~- ~:
-- --- - ....."
- ::
~=~~......~~- ~~~=~=_..........-~---=~~~=~~~
==~~ ~- = ~0Id-__~__
---- -- -- -- --
c::>c::>e:o..,,~.....e:oe:o~.....CO
~~~-;-:~""=~"":-:""= -
c:::ae:o.--_.,.-__........__....
....CO _.... __....__<G_
~~~ - ---
~ - ~
--
e:o_-_-_c::>CO
-
=
CII CII ~
~-
.;;.. ~ <-I CO" C' CII
.... - --..... - ""'"
~
~::::
;;: ~ ~
- t:: - - - t::
- - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ = -
- :::: - - i3 = i3 i3 ~ ;;;; i3
= ~ = = - Z = = = L> = = - = -
::: = = ~ ~ .;, ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ :;;" ~ ;:: ::: ::: ~ ~ - ~ = =: ~ L> ~ ~
L> ~ ~ L> ~ -
~
-
-
~
~
I!
.-
Ig
i~
s
:::
;j
-
=
= -
"'" = .... .
""" CJ Q,. .....
-- :;::> 'l-_::o- -
~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ .~. ': ~ ~
....._ CI__- Clo _
:::.:;- _- c:o..-_ -""",
~ .......... ~ e:o~=~~~~
"""- ~~~ - <Gcn.... .::z::-
- ~~~. ~~~=....
"""-....,;,c....,;,c:x:: ....o.w.....c:z:....._::::;
<-.--- ""'"__a::II .....c
~;z:=.::z::= -_:;::>:;::>>-_.... -.....
-~<=>CJO_.....A.___.....<;3DC_
......~~~~C..)___ _=.....__
;z: ....= __ -_~a::I.....""'"
C..)-.....~~~~....~~~~:z:;z:_~.....c
Q.,.....-_-....~= :z::.....c~ coo:
ClIli..........c....~..... _ - --:z: CJ
_~.....~~_ClClc:::._~~CI:KQ.,
..U?.....c.....c.....c~.....~..........=..........=::.::.;
_....;z:-""'~.....c-~..........O:;::>_OC.~
------~..........~~....._~-~-
.."....-........_--- ....
__-_-_c::>c:o c:::t_
"",,=~<G<G_"".n.n .nW-:~
-....,...;,...;..;,...;..;.,;...; .....rt
c:::o........_....__...._........._
:::~~~~~::::::::::::~:::
.
.
,
.
.:
.
=
=.
- ~~
== ~ =~~ ~
....~ :.;__Ci:;::>
~- .....~ ~_...... ~
......... .....<-...... -....
~> __..........__ > :z:
~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~=BB~=~~
_..........:z: _.........CJ.........._~>_>>. co<::'
-~~ ~~- ~.....~....o~-~~~~~=~
=~~....~~o ~~~~....~~~........~=--
......::.::KC..)>_....._ .....:z:_Clo~.......................... ..........
>===-_-..... Q,.-_=..... ~Q.,Q,.Q.,....C:O"C:O"
~==~~~~~ ....~~~~~~.....~~~""'~~Q,.
c.3<.::t<.::t...,....a::IIa::II ......... DC....._ ___ _ _ .:z: . _
=::z;=~ ...... _....~ _-_-_DC_~_-C..)-:z:~
~=~=~~~~~......~__a::IIa::II-~....~:.;~U~~~~U
___~_coC>->_::.:_~C>..... ....................... _coo:
...........=:;::>-_-~_....~_-...,~_Q,.c:o.. _~..-...._..
~~~~~~~~8=~~~~;===~=~~==~~=
=
-
-
- - - ~ ~
~ - - - ~ -
~ ::::; ~ ~
= - ==
- ~ == ~
--
;;~~~;;:;;;cn===;::;~:::::~
::::=:=:::::::-:::::=::::::::
.........................n.nC:::Oc::>ClIC:::O....C:::Oc:::o
-.....................-..........................................
-==-~=:::::.==-===-
~:;::
;;:
~:;:
~~
-=-
-,- T -C-
"
:: ~
~
- - ~
-
- -
~
:::
~
~
-
~
~
:::
- - -
::: :;;1:;;
~ ::;IB
~ ~ ~
-:::
- -
~
~ ~
- -
-
~ -
~
~ :::
~
~ ~ ~
<:>
~ -
~ --
=
<:>
- - - ~
~ :=: ~ :=
- - ~
~ - ~ :,: -
- ~
<:> ~
- :;; - :; ~
~ ~ ~ ~ - ;:::
~ ::: <:> = <:>
- - ~ -
-
<:>
~ ~ ~
-("-
TKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERITOR TOWER
.... CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUl., MINNESOTA 55101-21<0
PHONE:612/2Q2-4400 FAX:612/21l2'()()83
June 16, 1992
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Feasibility Report Update
Hidden Creek East 5th Addition
City Project 92-15
Andover,~nesota
Commission No. 10197
Dear Mayor and Council:
The above referenced project is the fifth phase of Hidden Creek East, as noted in the Feasibility
Report for Project 87-1, dated January 29,1987. That report details all improvements and covers
project costs and details. 1bis letter amends that report for the fifth addition.
Cost Estimate
The Fifth Addition proposes 33 residential lots. The cost estimate is as follows:
Sanitary Sewer
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
1 Mobilization 1.0 LS 3,400.00 3,400.00
2 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Stub 2.0EA 300.00 600.00
3 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-10' 101.0 LF 13.00 1,313.00
4 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 10-12' 568.0 LF 14.00 7,952.00
5 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-14' 731.0 LF 15.00 10,965.00
6 Standard 4' Diameter Manhole 0-10' 11.0 EA 1,050.00 11,550.00
7 Extra Depth Manhole 20.0 LF 60.00 1,200.00
8 8" x 4" PVC SDR 35 Wye 31.0 EA 40.00 1,240.00
9 4" PVC SDR 35 Vertical Cleanout 31.0 EA 50.00 1,550.00
10 4" PVC SDR 35 Service Pipe 930.0 LF 6.00 5,580.00
11 Trench Stabilization 200.0 LF 6.00 1,200.00
12 Televise Sanitary Sewer Lines 1.400.0 LF 0.60 840.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Sanitary Sewer $47,390.00
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Puldover,11llrrnesota
June 16, 1992
Page Two
Watermain
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantitv Price Amount
1 Connect to Existing Watennain 2.0EA 300.00 $ 600.00
2 6" DIP Gass 50 Watermain 45.0 LF 11.00 495.00
3 8" DIP Gass 50 Watermain 1,450.0 LF 13.00 18,850.00
4 6" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 3.0EA 400.00 1,200.00
5 8" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 2.0EA 500.00 1,000.00
6 6" MJ Hub Hydrant 8'-6" 3.0EA 1,100.00 3,300.00
7 MJ CIP Fittings 1,700.0 LB 1.50 2,550.00
8 I" Type K Copper Service 980.0 LF 7.00 6,860,00
9 I" Corporation Stop 31.0EA 40.00 1,240.00
10 I" Curb Stop with Box 31.0 EA 75.00 2.325.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Watermain $38,420.00
Storm Sewer
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantitv Price Amount
1 Remove/Salvage Existing 15" FES 1.0EA 100.00 $ 100.00
2 Build CB over Existing Storm Sewer 1.0 EA 250.00 , 250.00
3 Connect Storm Sewer to Existing CB 1.0EA 250.00 250.00
4 12" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 290.0 LF 17.00 4,930.00
5 15" RCP Gass 5 Storm Sewer 295.0 LF 19.00 5,605.00
6 18" RCP Gass 3 Storm Sewer 1,315.0 LF 23.00 30,245.00
7 18" RC Flared End Section 2.0 EA 450.00 900.00
8 4' Diameter Manhole 3.0EA 1,000.00 3,000.00
9 4' Diameter Catch Basin w/Sump 9.0 EA 1,000.00 9,000.00
10 Gass 2 Rip Rap 3.0CY 60.00 180.00
11 Geotextile Fabric 9.1 SY 6.00 54.60
Estimated Construction Cost - Storm Sewer $54,514.60
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
June 16, 1992
Page lbree
Streets and Restoration
Item
No. Description
Ouantitv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Common Borrow
Common Excavation
Subgrade Preparation
Surmountable Curb and Gutter
B618 Curb and Gutter
Class 5 Gravel
Bituminous Mix. 2331 Type 41
Seeding Mixture No. 900
380.0 CY
380.0 CY
14.7 RS
2,780.0 LF
160.0 LF
1,240.0 TN
570.0 TN
1.0 AC
Estimated Construction Cost - Streets & Restoration
Total Estimated Cost
Estimated Project Expenses
Total Estimated Project Cost
Estimated Assessments
Estimated Project Assessment Rate, $235,304.60/33 Lots
Sanitary Trunk Charge, $912/Acre x 11.3 Acres/33 Lots*
Water Trunk Charge, $972!Acre x 11.3 Acres!33 Lots*
Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge
Watermain Connection Charge
Total Estimated Assessments per Lot
* Trunk charges have been previously assessed under Project 87-3.
JLD:j
Unit
Price
3.00
1.50
100.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
23.00
1.000.00
$7,130.44
312.29
332.84
256.65
1.070.00
$9,102.22
Amount
$ 1,140.00
570.00
1,470.00
13,750.00
960.00
8,680.00
13,110.00
1.000.00
$40,680.00
$181,004.60
$54.300.00
$235,304.60
l, ,\
,-
t :
Ii
J.
t j
t '.
1 I
\ .~'
1 :'
r
I.'.,...!
" ,
i~ i
l ;- I
t'l
~! I
~ i I
I:. j
f I
!
\'\
~.. ;1
,. ~
r ~
,
,
11
l: ..
;, .
:.
,
z
0
f-
a ~
~.
0 0
..
~
<:( a
I
f-
LO
~.
W
..
~
W
W ~ II !l!
a:
,e.) <I
Z ~
W z
0 .. w
~
0 'E
I ~
N.N 15 HSOllHl
.. II % <I !::! . -
t<l
.. ~ " " .. " .. 2
,
.. ~ "
01
! ~~IIII
~"r-I MllSrll~/
\
~
L;C~yvz
Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -' ~
_________LL---
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
____L_LL------
Andover . Anoka · Champlin · Dayton · Ramsey
~
'If)
May 29, 1992
R(~u~ Eljl~1lD
,,-
Mr. Jim Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
CITY OF ANDOVER
As you know, the Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce annua~~y p ~
Offical Magazine of the Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce. This magazine
features articles on each of the cities this Chamber represents, and other
information of interest to current and potential residents. Over 30,000
magazines are printed, of which approximately 25,000 are direct-mailed to
every resident in Andover, Anoka, Champlin, Dayton and Ramsey. A supply
of magazines is given to each City Hall for distribution to new residents,
and they are also mailed from the Chamber office to people requesting area
information. I know you will agree that this magazine is extremely
positive for our area.
The cost to produce this magazine is great. The cost of producing the
special pages on Anoka alone well exceed $700.00. Paid advertising by
local businesses does defray much of the production costs, however, the
companies who have produced this magazine in the past have just broken
even. The magazine may not be produced in the future should this trend
continue.
The project is in need of your financial support. We realize that,
financially, these are not the best of times for the cities when it comes
to money, so whatever monies you can contribute will be greatly
appreciated. As always, Andover will receive a special page in our
magazine along with a number of copies to be distributed at City Hall
whether you are able to give or not.
If you have any questions, please call me at 421-7130. Thank you for your
continued support of the Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce and your
consideration of this request.
Sincerely yours,
~7k~
Peter Turok
Executive Vice President
Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce
222 East Main Street. Anoka, MN 55303. (612) 421-7130
t
(jU "jqy
~ I'
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERITOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551 01-2140
PHONE:6121292-4400 FAX:612/292-ll083
June 3, 1992
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Pu1dover,Milrnesota
Re: Regular Council Meeting
June 2,1992
Pu1dover, Milrnesota
Commission No. 9140-992
Dear Mayor and Councihnembers:
The following is a summary of engineering matters discussed and action taken at the Regular
Meeting of the City Council held June 2, 1992.
1. Auditor Subdivision 82 Replat
The Council approved, and submitted by resolution to the District Judge for processing, a
replat of Auditor Subdivision 82 to be designated "Boundary Commission Plat No.1".
2. Weybridge Addition, Change Order No.1, Proj. 92-2, Comm. No. 10102
Change Order No.1 to add Bid Alternates 1 and 2 to the contract with Hank Weidema, Inc.
in the anlount of $28,259.40 was approved.
The Council authorized the attorney to include the cost of Bid Alternates 1 and 2 for
jacking utilities from Weybridge Addition easterly through the Burlington Northern
Railroad right-of-way on the development contract.
The cost will be assessed to Weybridge Addition, Phases 1 and 2, and an area credit given
iG prop.,my east of t..;e track subject to future extension of the MUSA boundary and sewer
and water service extensions.
3. Commercial Boulevard
A staff report for Commercial Boulevard location through the Commercial Park was
discussed. Several plats adjacent to "Jay" Street indicate a need to defme residential and
commercial land use and traffic pattems.
A location between Lots 12 and 13 of Watts Garden Acres east of Jay Street was favored.
Pu1 alignment west of Jay Street between Lots 4 and 5 of Watts Garden Acres or through
Lot 4 (Andover Auto Parts) were suggested alternates.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
. June 4,1992
Page 2
Council Action:
The Council authorized staff and the City Attorney to secure appraisals for acquisition of
an 80' wide right-of-way for the two alternative routes west of Jay Street affecting the
Andover Auto Parts property.
4. Minor MUSA Boundary Amendments, Proj. 92-3 and 92-4, Comm. No. 10103 and
10127
The Metro Council staff by letter dated May 28,1992 to David Carlberg, City Planner
asked for a Council resolution for the following:
1) The MPCA's "urban best management practices" titled Protecting Water Quality in
Urban Areas or an equivalent set of standards;
2) Design standards for new stormwater ponds that will reduce the contaminant
loadings from surface water runoff, such as National Urban Runoff Program
(NURP) design criteria; and
3) The pre-settling of runoff in sedimentation basins prior to the discharge of runoff to
wetlands.
Council Action:
The Council passed a resolution as requested, that said proposed standards will be adopted
upon adoption by the Metro Council as roles and regulations.
5. Pheasant Meadows Feasibility Report, Proj. 92-10, Comm. No. 10174
The Council received the feasibility report and authorized plans and specifications for
improvements.
The Council suggested that City staff meet with the several developers involved in replats
for Watts Garden Acres a::ea :md assure continuity of street and utility services.
6. Pinewood Estates Feasibility Report, Proj. 92-4, Comm. No. 10103
The Council received the feasibility report and authorized plans and specifications for the
improvements.
The Council authorized the City Administrator/Engineer to negotiate a drainage easement
over the wetland at the northwest quadrant of Andover Boulevard and Hanson Boulevard.
Such drainage easement will be to elevation 886.00.
, 'lIonorable Mayor and City Council
. June 4, 1992
Page 3
7. Meadows of Round Lake MSA Designation, Proj. 91-27, Comm. No. 10066
The Council by resolution authorized the designation of 143rd Avenue NW from Eldorado
Street to Anoka County Road 9, (Round Lake Boulevard) to be an MSA Route (MSA 198-
121-01).
8. Winslow Hills 2nd Addition Final Plat, Proj. 92.4, Comm. No. 10127
The Council approved the final plat subject to confIrmation of the MUSA boundary
expansion approval by the Metro Council, developer's agreements and storm drainage
easements.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:00 P.M.
Sincerely,
JLD/mha
f.
..-r-.
;CJ' cc
roj; 0/ fz-
- ECEilfE-l
U ,I)~ 1 0 1992 U i
June 10, 1992
..-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Mr. James Schrantz
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, Nn 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
Enclosed is a document which I presented to the Tree Commission
last Monday, June 8, 1992. Given the short time the Tree
Commission has had to review changes in the Ordinance and Tree
Policy, I don't know if any items in this document were reviewed
or looked at, so I would respectively request that this document
be included in the City Council Agenda material so that they may
have time to review the questions raised in the document prior to
Tuesdays, council meeting.
Sincerely,
tr;t;j~;j}d
Jerry Windschitl
Carol Windschitl
,
'.
June 8, 1992
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, HN 55304
RE: (1) Ordinance No. 29C - an ordinance relating to the
preservation of shade trees and the prevention of
epidemic diseases in shade trees within the City of
Andover.
(2) City of Andover - Tree Preservation Policy 1992
In an attempt to document our concerns about the above mentioned
documents, we are submitting the following written questions and
objections.
In doing a detailed review of the above document, it becomes
apparent that two completely unrelated subjects are being
incorporated into the above documents, these are:
(1) The rules, definitions and ordinance language required to
enact an ordinance for the prevention of epidemic disease
in shade trees within the city of Andover.
(2) The development of an ordinance that would:
(a) Control healthy shade trees on private property.
(b) Control the shade trees in the future plats and
developments within the City of Andover.
General Comments
In regard to the part of the ordinance relating to the prevention
of epidemic diseases in shade trees, I think few people would
object if the ordinance is written such that:
(1) It is enforced uniformly
(2) If sufficient time is allowed for abatement
(3) It is not arbitrary in definition and purpose.
1
(4) If there truly exists the resources to do the abatement.
My understanding is that the only proven abatement for
the major problem facing Andover (Oak wilt) is the
vibratory plow which would only be available to Andover
for a maximum of two weeks per year. This small amount of
time will not be sufficient for any significant abatement
within the City.
(5) Has the cost benefit related to Andover residents been
determined. This ordinance has the potential of costing
Andover residents many thousands of dollars. If one makes
an analyses of the cost of removing all the diseased trees
in Andover, the cost would clearly be in the millions of
dollars. For example if one had to cut down and dispose
5 oak trees at commercial rates, the cost would exceed
$1,500, or an average of $300.00 per tree.
At a rate of $300.00 per tree. it would onlv take the
removal of 3.334 trees to spend a million dollars. There
clearly are more than 3,324 trees that would need to be
removed if this ordinance is enacted.
In many cases the removal of trees will exceed $300.00 per
tree, as the locations, size disposal fees and other
subjective factors make tree removal very expensive.
(6) This ordinance should address and encourage a
reforestation program for the City.
(7) All references to chemical use should be removed from the
ordinance. At the present time no known chemical
treatment is available and it would seem that a
governmental unit should not be advocating chemical use of
any kind. The track record of various chemicals that have
been used in the past has not been good and any chemical
has the potential for future soil contamination.
(8) Why does Section 12 exist?
If one drives through Andover and looks at the existing
development, it would be hard to argue that the developers
have not made a sincere and valid attempt to preserve as
many trees as possible.
2
\
What is it that we as developers have not done? If a
problem does not exist. whv does it need to be controlled.
The healthy trees on private property are clearly owned by
the various property owners. Where does the citv qet the
leqal power to tell us what we can or cannot do with our
own private propertv?
In regard to the "Tree Preservation Policy 1992", we would offer
the following comments and questions.
purpose (as stated in the tree policy)
I. purpose. The purpose of this policy is to preserve and
protect significant trees or stands of trees whose loss due to
land disturbances would affect the character of neighborhoods,
subdivisions, public or semi-public projects and commercial
developments;
ouestions
Does the citv of Andover have the leqal riqht to enforce the
above policv on private land? (Note: my question deals with the
healthy trees on private land)
It is normal for cities to enact ordinances to protect the public
health, safety or welfare of its residences. The stated purpose
above does not address anv of these issues.
It would seem that it would be very difficult for a city to argue
that somehow its residents public health, safety or welfare would
be in jeopardy if a private land owner cut or removed trees from
private property.
If the above tree policv is beinq enacted to preserve trees for
some other purpose. at the expense of the land owner than it
clearlv is a takinq and the citv should purchase these parcels
from the land owner.
We would respectivelv request that the Andover citv attornev qive
a written leqal opinion about this ordinance and tree policv as
it relates to the control and requlations of healthv trees on
private propertv.
3
Questions on the Tree Policv
II. APplicability. This policy shall apply to any person or
entity that would disturb land areas and impact significant trees
or stands of trees in neighborhoods, subdivisions, commercial
developments. public and semi-public projects such as streets,
utilities and parks whether disturbed by a public agency of
private developer; except where the City Council may waive these
requirements where there would be a greater public need for the
project that to meet the requirements of this pOlicy. A public
hearing shall be held before declaring such a waiver. The
property owners within three hundred fifty (350') feet of the
site shall be notifies at least ten (10) days before the hearing,
The terms and provisions of the Tree Preservation POlicy in
conjunction with the city Tree Ordinance No. 29C shall apply to
all activity'which requires the issuance of a Land Disturbance
Permit,
1. What will be the criteria for the Citv Council to waive the
requirements of this policv?
2. Why the requirements of a public hearinq of property owners
within 350' of the site?
If a public hearing is held it would be a guarantee that
almost 100% of the people would be opposed to the land
disturbance permit, if they had a choice. Why not, they do
not own the property or the trees, but would like to see
all trees remain. Would these objections then be used to
deny the land disturbance permit?
Section III Definitions
The tree pOlicy defines the fOllowing:
Protection Zone
"All lands that fall outside the buildable area of a parcel"
At present almost all utilities such as electric, gas, telephone
and cable are constructed per city requirement in what is defined
as the protection zone above. Where are these utilities to be
constructed in the future?
4
Specimen Tree or Stand
"Any tree or grouping of trees which has been determined to be of
a high value by the City Forester/Tree Inspector because of its
specimen, size, age or other professional criteria."
What does of a hiqh value mean?
It would appear that this section is at best arbitrarv. Who will
make the above decisions?
WoodLot
"Any wooded area with significant trees."
Who will determine these and what will the criteria be?
IV Procedures
"A. Development standards. Developments shall be designed to
preserve large trees and woodlots where such preservation would
not affect the public health, safety and welfare. The city may
prohibit removal of all or part of a woodlot or stand of trees."
When would the tree preservation policv affect and when would it
not affect the public health. safety and welfare of the residents
of Andover?
What critia would be used bv the citv to prohibit removal of all
or part of a woodlot or stand of trees?
"B. Land Disturbance Permit"
1. A tree protection plan shall be submitted with the
following:
(a) Sketch plans for the subdivision of property.
.
.
.
2. The Tree Protection Plan shall include the fOllowing
information:
a. Definition of spatial limits:
(1) Limits of land disturbance, clearing, grading
and trenching
(2) Tree protection zones
(3) Specimen trees or stands of trees.
5
b. Detail drawings of tree protection measures (where
applicable) :
(1) Protective tree fencing
(2) Tree protection signs
c. Drawings indicating location of applicable
utilities:
(1) City water or well
(2) City sewer or septic system
(3) Electricity
(4) Gas
(5) Cable TV
(6) Telephone
Does this mean that a developer would have to have surveved each
tree to know if it is a specimen tree. where it is exact Iv
located. where the tree protective zone would be exactlv? This
cost could be verv larqe as survev crews are quite expensive.
"5. city staff may submit the plan to a consulting forester for
a recommendation, any cost shall be paid for by the developer or
builder."
What would be the reason whv a plan would be submitted to a
consultinq forester? This cost could be very hiqh and would be
uncontrollable.
8. If any significant tree in development or building site is
cut, damaged or the area within the tree's dripline has been
encroached upon by grading equipment without City authorization,
the City shall require planting or two (2) new trees. In
addition, if the City determines that a damaged tree will
probably not survive, it shall be removed by the developer.
a. Any trees required to be planted shall be varied
in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the
area, shall not include any species under disease epidemic
and shall be hardy under local conditions. Trees shall be
at least two and one-half (2 1/2") inches in diameter for
deciduous trees and eight (8') feet tall for coniferous
trees per nurserv standard measurements.
b. Any trees required to be planted shall be replace if
they die or appear to be dying within one (1) year of
planting by the person responsible for the planting.
6
c. Before any construction or grading takes place, snow
fencing or erosion control fencing shall be placed around
the borders of woodlots of the driplines of large trees to
be preserved. Signs shall be place along this fence line
prohibiting grading beyond the fence line.
d. The developer/contractor shall escrow 150% of the
proiect cost of tree replacement when tree conditions do not
allow the trees to be planted at the time of the development
or construction.
If we understand this section it appears to be savinq that we as
private propertv owners would have to replace trees on land we
own in the event we damaqed them? Is it not our private propertv
riqht to manaqe the trees as we see fit?
In this section and later (section VI.B.2) a requirement exists
to build a fence 4' high around woodlots and the driplines of
large trees. This would be a very expensive process and it is
next to impossible to keep up a 4' high fence as the wind blows
them down.
Section IV C 4 Gives the fOllowing:
4. The City may reduce the maximum allowed density under
Density Zoning or the Planned Unit Development on developments
that have significant trees, where such reduction would save all
or part of such significant trees. Any Required Significant
Trees: The City Council may require the clustering of dwellings
in the form of townhouses, quads, apartments or similar uses,
where it is necessary to preserve significant trees.
What measures would be used to require compliance with these
sections?
Sections VI C2 Gives the fOllowing:
2. It is very strongly suggested that all clearing in oak
stands be done before May 1st and after July 1st of each season.
This will help to keep the inadvertent wounding of trees with the
consequential spread of oak wilt. If clearing has to be done at
this time, all stumps and wounded trees shall have the wound
areas painted thoroughly with a tree paint. To be effective, the
painting shall be performed within the same day of cutting.
Should oak wilt get started as a result of construction during
the months of May and June, then the developer/builder shall pay
for all additional oak wilt control measures needed to control
the disease. This is in accordance with the city Tree Ordinance
No. 29C.
7
,
The above sections would be almost impossible for a builder to
comply with as we build vear around and the cost of doino it is
so larqe that it would be impossible to do. Also it raises the
leoal questions of the builder beino sued if construction was
done durino the time prescribed in this section.
Summarv
After careful reading and analysis of this tree policy we have
the fOllowing final comments:
(1) Serious legal questions exist with the proposed ordinance
and tree pOlicy.
(a) Does the city have a right to regulate healthy trees
on private land?
(b) Sections of the proposed tree policy are so vague and
arbitrary that it would seem that is would be very
difficult for the City to defend the ordinance and
tree policy.
(2) Why do we need the tree policy? Have the developers and
builders not done a good job with trees, We are all
capable people and think we have done an excellent job so
far. We try to be receptive to concerns and surely try to
save trees. It is in our economic interest to make our
developments look as good as possible.
(3) A public hearing was held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the council voted to disapprove the
proposed ordinance and tree policy.
(4) What overriding interest exists that is driVing the tree
policy, such that an attempt is being made to
significantly intrude on private property rights.
(5) What is the price tag for the tree policy? All of these
costs get passed along to future home owners. In the end
will the home owner receive any benefit from this
ordinance.
(6) If the City has some concerns with those of us in the
development or building business, please tell us. I find
it hard to believe that we would not try to work with the
City.
8
..
We would respectively ask that the tree commission and City
Council concentrate on the prevention of Epidemic Diseases in
shade trees and encourage reforestation and omit the rest of the
sections of the ordinance and tree policy that relates to land
development and building as no evidence exists to warrant the
enactment of this very restrictive and costly ordinance and tree
policy.
Sincerely,
/J~ ~W~
~ a,' W~~
9
.^'\\.l4
\:\~/
'e\
. f.
~" EC Ef V't:--
HrJIJN 51992/U
.~
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
June 8, 1992
7:30 PM
CITY OF ANDOVER
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
--
/0 CC.
~f,/rL
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6. Approve Bills
7. Budget Assumptions Themes and Goals
8. Award Bid ror Proj 92-04: Creekview Rip-rap
PERMIT ITEMS
9. M.A.C, Perimeter Service Road Const.
10. Ham Lake Street Imprv Proj: 179th Ave
11. Osborne Ditch Repair (D-58)
12. Heather Wood
13. Park Construction Soil Mining Location
14. Sand Creek Estates West Utilities
15. Pinewood Estates
16. Winslow Hills 2nd Add.
17. WDE Landfill Site 95% Draft Remedial Design Closure Plan
DISCUSSION ITEMS
18. Pingers Plaza Structure Design OPtions
19. Criteria for Selecting Professional Services
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
20. Receive Staff Report
21. Petition on Lower Coon Creek
22. Letter to Andover on Water Quality
23. 1992 Ammendments to the Watershed District Act
24. EQB Water Monitoring Plan
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
May 18, 1992
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on May 18, 1992 at the Bunker Hi lIs
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams, Bob Boyum.
Staff :
Ulrich.
Tim Kelly, Kathy Tingelstad, Ed Matthiesen, Michelle
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:31 PM
2. Approval of the Agenda: Moved by Richmond, seconded by
Williams, Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
3. Open Mike: No one was present,
POlicy Items
4. Approval of May II, 1992 Minutes: Moved by Williams, seconded
by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes.,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
5. Approval of Administrative Levy Legislation: Kelly presented
background On this item and stated that it needs to be
aCknowledged and filed with the Secretary of State that the Board
of Managers approves of the special legislation increasing the
administrative levy to $200,000. Williams moved and Richmond
seconded the motion to approve the special legislation through
the adoption of resolution 92-09. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
RESOLUTION 92-09
APPROVAL OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO INCREASE
ADMINISTRATIVE FUND LEVY TO $200,000
WHEREAS, The Coon Creek Watershed District is established under
Minnesota Statutes 1030 to protect the public health and welfare
by managing the water and related land resources of Coon Creek,
and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1030.905 Subdivision 3 authori~es the
District to levy a tax for the District's administrative fund,
and
WHEREAS. On October 14, 1991 in resolution 91-13, the Coon Creek
Watershed District Board of Managers resolved to encourage the
Minnesota State Legislature to remove the levy cap of 125,000
from the administrative fund, and
WHEREAS, The Minnesota State Legislature through Laws of
Minnesota Statutes 1992 Chapter 511, Article 2, sectIon 52
authori~es the Coon Creek Watershed District to levy a tax not to
exceed $200,000 on property within the District for the
administrative fund, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 645.021 requires the Board of
Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District to approve the law
by a majority vote and certify the approval with the Minnesota
Secretary of State for the law to be effective.
Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - May 11, 1992
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Coon Creek Watershed District
Board of Managers, hereby approves Laws of Minnesota 1992,
Chapter 511, Article 2, section 52
Permit Items
6. Weybridge Utilities: Matthiesen presented the permit review.
The purpose of this project is installation of city utilities.
Kelly presented background on this item, stating that the
applicant had submitted a permit application in the fall of 1991
but needed to return to the District after the City of Andover's
comprehensive plan was completed. The Metropolitan Council
recently reviewed and approved the city's minor comprehensive
plan amendment relating to Weybridge. Ponding reQuirements were
discussed. There was discussion about final approval of the
Weybridge project. The Board decided that it would be appropriate
to wait for the final action on the part of the city. Based on
the findings in the permit review it was recommended that the
permit be approved pending receipt of the following: an erosion
control and vegetation plan and a stipulation that the contractor
obtain a District permit. Motion to approve as stipulated was
moved by Williams and seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with
five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays.
7. Mears Pond Construction: Matthiesen presented the permit
review. The purpose of this project is to increase the depth of
existing pond on about 1/2 acre. Based on the findings in the
permit review it was recommended that the permit be approved with
the fOllowing stipulation: that no dredged material be placed on
the wetland area. Motion to approve with stipulation was moved by
Williams and seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond, and Williams) and no nays.
8. Townhomes of Majestic Oaks 2nd Addition: Matthiesen presented
the permit review. The purpose of this project is development of
22 townhome units on 7.4 acres. Byron Westlund of Woodland
Development Company was in attendance. Matthiesen stated that the
area is out of the flOOdplain and that runoff from thlS area
drains away frem the golf course. Based on the findings in the
permit review it was recommended that the permit be approved with
the fOllowing stipulation: receipt of erosion escrow amount of
$870. It was noted that the applicant should contact the PCA
regarding the reQuirements for an HPDES permit for grading
greater than five acres. Motion to approve with stipulation was
moved by Hentges and seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five
yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays.
Informational Items
9. JMM Program on non-point Management on the Minnesota River:
Matthiesen invited the Managers to a seminar which his flrm was
hosting. Kelly was planning to attend this May 20 event.
There was no new business.
The meeting adjourned at 8:16 PM on a motion by Soyum, seconded
by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays,
Reglnald A. Hemmes. Preslden~
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA NUMBER:
FILE NUMBER:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
APPLICANT:
APPLICABILITY:
EXHIBITS:
CONSIDERATIONS:
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
PERMIT REVIEW
D fC Ei Vt~:.
6\1 JIJN 51992 U
June 8, 1992
13
2-1-92-36
Park Construction Mining Permit (125 Bunker Lake Boulevard).
,~
CITY'OF ANDOVER
125 Bunker Lake Boulevard, Andover, MN.
Regrade site and truck access material to MnDOT Project 0214-
10.
Park Construction Company
7900 Beach Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1.15 . Control of Erosion and Sedimentation from Drainage.
Grading, drainage, and erosion control plan by Comstock and
Davis, dated May 20, 1992.
Transmittal letter by Jillian Fenendael, May 20, 1992.
Permit Application by Park Construction.
Quad map showing project location.
National Wetland Inventory Map showing project location.
Half-section property map showing project location.
Storage calculations.
Soil boring report by Braun-Intertec, May 20, 1992.
FINDINGS: It is not shown how long the project will take.
A revegetation schedule is shown on the drawing set.
The site is approximately 41 acres and drains to County Ditch
57-l.
The amount of storage on the site contains two 100-year events.
Therefore, it is unlikely that any runoff will exit this property.
This project site is surrounded by DNR Protected Wetlands
and Corps Protected Wetlands. Based on the NWI maps and
Anoka County Soil Survey, the project site does not affect either
of these wetlands.
The excavated soil is Zimmerman fine sand.
The erosion escrow for this project is $500 + 41 acres x $50 per
acre = $2,550.
According to John Gannon, Park Construction Project
Manager, the project is expected to be completed by August
1993. After that time, he thought the landowner would develop
the property.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval upon receipt of erosion escrow amount.
Note: Applicant should contact PCA regarding NPDES
requirements for grading areas larger than 5 acres.
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA NUMBER:
FILE NUMBER:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
APPLICANT:
COON CREEK WATERSHED DlSTRICf
PERMIT REVIEW
June 8,1992
/S"
2-1-92-23
Pine wood Estates
Northwest quadrant
Boulevard in Andover.
Development of 174 single family units on 65.1 acres.
Continental Development Corporation
12093 nex Street
Coon Rapids, MN 55448
CONTACf PERSON: Charles S. Cook
APPLICABILITY:
EXHIBITS:
CONSIDERATIONS:
FINDINGS:
1.15 - Control of Erosion and Sedimentation from Drainage.
Pennit Application and filing fee, received May 29, 1992.
Letter from Metropolitan Council regarding water quality
issues from Carl J. Schenk and James Larsen, dated May 28,
1992.
Letter from Tim Kelly to Charles Cook regarding wetland
delineations, April 29, 1992.
Letter from Thomas A. SytKo, TKDA, regarding pre- and
post-development hydrologic conditions, dated May 28, 1992.
Preliminary plat by Caine and Associates, revised May 20,
1992. .
Grading and drainage plan by Ken Gust, revised June 2, 1992.
Erosion and sediment control plan by Ken Gust, June 1, 1992,
The property drains southerly to County Ditch 57.
Two wetlands appear on this property based on the National
Wetland Inventory Map. However, the northerly wetland is
inconsistent with the Anoka County soils map and field
investigations and should not be considered further.
No documentation has been presented regarding how the
. wetland alterations have been avoided or minimized.
A pond is proposed on the southeast corner as mitigation for
wetland alteration. An outlet should be shown for this pond.
The 100-year elevation for the interior pond is 887.9. The
walkout elevations are 890.0; therefore, 2 feet above the
expected 100-year elevation. The emergency overflow
elevation from this pond is 889.0.
Erosion escrow amount is $500 + 65.1 x $50 per acre = $3,755.
Proposed culvert at Andover Boulevard shows elevation 982
should read elevation 882.
Post-development rate of discharge is equal to the
predevelopment rate.
~1'.lN'G DATE:
AGENDA NUMBER:
FILE NUMBER:
ITEM:
RECOMMENDATION:
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
PERMIT REVIEW
(Continued)
June 8, 1992
IS'
2-1-92-23
Pinewood Estates
.'
Approval pending receipt of:
- Erosion escrow
- Plan showing 1) a baffied weir outlet structure and 2) a
bench (see attached detail).
- A pond maintenance program.
Note: Applicant should contact the PCA regarding NPDES
requirements for grading on parcels larger than 5
acres.
MEETING DATE: June 8, 1992
AGENDA NUMBER: 16
FILE NUMBER: 2-1-92-09
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
PERMIT REVIEW
Development of 60 single family units on 29 acres
APPLICANT: Winslo\~ Holasek
Holasek Properties, Inc.
1159 Andover ald.
Andover, MN 55304
APPLICABILITY:
Any activity involving drainage, or fi11ing of
wetlands.(1.09)
Development of land not authorized by the municipal drainage
plan (1.03)
EXHIBITS: Permit application
Preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control
plan by Loucks and Assoc. 5/12/92.
Preliminary plat, Winslow Hills 2nd Add by HY-Land
surveying revised 2/4/92
Erosion control escrow of $1,950 rcvd 5/5/92
5/13/92 letter from J Davidson, TKDA on ponding
Notes from 5/15/92 meeting with G. Gorham & city
staff on water quality ponding.
5/29/92 letter from J Davidson, TKDA on ponding
5/28/92 letter from Met Council to Dave Carlberg,
Andover on Water quality and wetland mngt.
5/29/92 Revised grading plan by Loucks and Assoc.
Notes from 5/29/92 meeting with G. Gorham & city
staff on water quality ponding.
Notes from 6/3/92 conversation with G. Gorham.
CONSIDERATIONS:
FINDINGS: Wetland filling is avoided
Storm water management and hydrology is
inconclusive at this point.
Pretreatment of stormwater prior to discharge into
wetlands is proposed for pond 0 but is not
shown on revised plan.
Water quality modeling of the site shows that
additional ponding is not required. Water
quality can be achieved with through the
existing series of ponds and wetlands and the
construction of the proposed sediment basin
adjacent to pond D.
. . . ..
RECOMMENDATION: Allow applicant to begin rough grading at
his own risk subject to any revisions that may come about
UPC~ a more thorough review of the hydrology of the
development.
~
l{;'. cC
foj/b/f6
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANI
2015 1ST AVE., ANOKA MN 55303
fjofCEiVE-
HI JUN B 1992 U
~~DOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY
MEETING NOTICE
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Wednesday, June 17, 1992 - 8:30 a.m. - Committee Room, Anoka City Hall
AGENDA
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Minutes of Previous Meetings
D. Treasurer's Report
E. Payment of Bills
F. Report of Officers
G. Consideration of Communications
H. Pending Projects/Permit Reviews
1. First Quarter Report - Jankowski
2. Second Quarter Reports - all members
3. Mobil Service Station Permit Review
I.
Old
1.
2.
3.
Business
Water Quality Records/Maintenance - Jankowski
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
Agency Board Members to Serve on the interim Wetland
Review Board - Schrantz
Set-up of a Technical Review Committee for the
LRRWMO.
Update on City of Ramsey Project #91-14
4.
5.
J.
New Business
1. Policy on How
Wetland Projects
to Deal with Future Anoka
- Response from C. Pearson
County
K. Adjournment
ATTENDANCE:
WMO Members
REMINDER: The Bill Review Committee meets prior to the
regular meeting.
1-"
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORG
~~ E C E i V'Elj-
TIO
JlJN 81992
CITY OF" AND -'....
OVeR
MAY 20, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8:30
a.m. in the Committee Room of Anoka City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Scott Erickson, Steve
Jankowski, and John Weaver.
Also present were Ray Schultz, Anoka alternate; Jim Knutson,
Deputy Treasurer; David Newman, Vice-President, Nedegaard
Construction; and Doug Fischer, Anoka County Design Engineer.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Motion was made by EriCkson, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE APRIL 15, 1992, X~ETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
TREASURER'S REPORT
EriCkson presented the Treasurer's Report for the month
ending April 30, 1992, as well as a fiscal year 1991 report
which reflects January secretarial service expenditures that
fall within the 1991 budget. The April 1992 account balances
show a money market checking account balance of $10.00; an
interest bearing savings account balance of $5,766.64, less a
permit account balance of $1,327.00, for a total savings
account balance of $4,439.64; and a certificate of depOSit
account balance of $8,000; for a current total balance, as of
April 30, 1992, of $13,776.44. Erickson confirmed all four
member cities have paid their first half year contributions.
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by EriCkson, to ACCEPT
THE TREASURER'S REPORT AS PRESENTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Annual Budget Report
Knutson provided a brief presentation of the annual budget
report for the LRRWMO for fiscal year 1991, ending January
31, 1992. Graphs were provided showing the cities' contribu-
tions and fund balances from 1987 through 1992.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 2
.~ .. - .
,. .-;__;_~-.:..--.-'"'i- ~._~ rI..
." "Dur{ng di~~ussion Knutson conf irmed the LRRWMO's operating
'assessment 'fb~ fiscal year 1992 is $14,600. . This amount does
not include':, \funds received for LRRWMO permit reviews.
'Knutson indIcated it is the organization's intent that the
permit-. revieW' process pay for itself through the permit fees
received.;".:'
" t,~ v:f
-..'
-'.---
. -
_ --'Erickson noted the figures he has for the permit account
balance is different than that shown in the annual report.
Knutson agreed to check into the matter.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Jankowski, a Bill Review committee member, presented the
bills received which are to be considered for payment: three
from the City of Anoka, February (#16272), $54.19: March
(#1627.3), $108.82; and April (#16274), $60.97: Bruce R.
Siegfried, CPA, Fiscal Year 1991 Audit Report, $400.00: and
two Barr Engineering bills for professional services provided
during the period December 29, 1991, through February 29,
1992, (#23/02-047), $1,307.17, and one for the period March
1, 1992, through March 28, 1992, $527.50. The board agreed
to consider the Barr Engineering billings separately.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE FEBRUARY $54.19, ~~RCH $108.82, AND APRIL $60.97, 1992,
BILLINGS FROM THE CITY OF ANOKA, AND THE BILLING FROM BRUCE
R. SIEGFRIED, CPA, FOR THE 1991 AUDIT AND REPORT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $400.00.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Hotion carried.
Discussion continued relative to the two Barr Engineering
bills. The board concurred a more definitive breakdown of
charges is again needed from the Consulting Engineer, noting
that such a breakdown had been provided in some of the
previous billings. Members felt it important to obtain the
continually requested breakdown in order to accurately charge
off these expenses to the proper budget line items or permit
accounts. Schrantz felt this matter should be discussed with
Dean Skallman, the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer, requesting
that he assign the specific charges to the city. .or project
incurring those expenses: whoever initiates it should pay for
it. Jankowski concurred with the need for greater billing
detail: however, he also indicated this Barr Engineering bill
has been out there for some time, and he did not want to hold
it'up any more. Schrantz suggested, and the other members
concurred, that these bills from Barr Engineering be
approved, but that the check be held until the LRRWMO
Treasurer, Erickson, has a chance to talk to Skallman,
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 3
requesting that he first provide
necessary breakdown in order that
charged off to the proper accounts.
this organization with the
these expenses might be
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to
AUTHORIZE THAT A CHECK BE CUT FOR BARR ENGINEERING INVOICES
#11432-390 IN THE AMOUN~ OF $1,307.17 AND #11856-390 IN THE
fu~OUNT OF $527.50, BUT THAT THE CHECK NOT BE SE~IT TO BARR
ENGINEERING UNTIL A BREAKDO!'lN OF THESE EXPENSES IS PROVIDED
ALLOWING FOR PROPER LRRWMO DISBURSEMENT TO SPECIFIC ACCOUNTS.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
REPORT OF OFFICERS None.
PENDING PROJECTS/PE~fIT REVIEWS
Meadows of Round Lake and Eldorado Street, Permit #92-6100,
City of Andover
David Newman, Vice-President, Nedegaard Construction, was
present to discuss the proposed Meadows of Round Lake project
which involves wetland mitigation and a stormsewer plan,
Department of Natural Resource (DRR) permit #92-6100.
Schrantz drew the board's attention to April 28 and May 4,
1992, comments and recommendations received the LRRW~~O
ConSUlting Engineer. His comments indicated that although
the stormsewers meet the requirements of the LRffi'lMO, the
concrete spillways have the potential for erosion and do not
meet the watershed's requirements. The wetland mitigation
reportedly meets the requirements of the LRRWMO for
replacement in kind. Schrantz stated the City of Andover
will address and take care of the identified spillway
problems. He further confirmed this project was exempt from
the interim wetland regulations in that the preliminary plan
was approved prior to the regulations' inception.
The full plat and its numerous drawings were presented and
discussed for this Meadows of Round Lake proj ect. Hr. Newman
indicated the City of Andover has been advised the DNR
permits have been approved. The Corps of Engineers is
requiring wetland mitigation at a ratio of two to one. ~x.
Newman stated this mitigation has met with the satisfaction
of the DNR. However, it has reportedly been stated that the
cities are not paying enough attention to the preservation of
,V'et1ands over a long term process. Mr. Newman felt it will;
therefore, become more and more difficult to obtain these
permits. However, the Corps of Engineers has reportedly
indicated to Mr. Ne\~an/the City of Andover, its willingness
to grant a permit for this proiect.
LRRWMO Meeting
May 20, 1992
Page 4
Minutes
Doug Fischer,
the board the
',li II resul t in
Anoka County Design Engineer, discussed with
county approved access to Highway 116, which
a four-lane highway all the way to Highway 47.
Jankowski noted the comments received from the LRRWMO Consul-
ting Engineer noting that the placement of material excavated
from the wetlands in the proposed wetlands will result in the
growth of wetland species similar to the types lost due to
this project. He appears to be comfortable with that aspect
of the proposal. Jankowski indicated Skallman is, however,
concerned with the potential for erosion. Schrantz stated
the City of Andover will address and correct that erosion
concern to the Consulting Engineer's satisfaction. Jankowski
felt he could then be comfortable with the project.
Motion was made by Jankowski,
APPROVE PERMIT #92-6100 FOR THE
ROUND LAKE PROJECT.
seconded by Erickson, to
CITY OF ANDOVER, MEADOWS OF
Erickson queried whether the quality of the wetland replace-
ment will be upgraded. Hr. Fischer stated quality is not
addressed in the interim wetland regulations: there is merely
a one to one ratio requirement. Mr. Newman indicated part of
the plan is to do enhancement. Schrantz confirmed the city
has done everything the DNR has required of them, as shown on
the plans.
VOTE: 4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Douglas Mr. Fischer addressed the board with his request for
consideration. Anoka County is proposing a culvert
replacement of CR 58 at County Ditch Number six. Not only
did ~x. Fischer request LRRWMO approval of this project but,
more importantly, expressed the county's desire to work out a
permanent arrangement for dealing with maintenance projects
of this type in the future. Mr. Fischer's Hay 13, 1992,
letter to Schrantz and attached information addressing this
matter was noted.
Mr. Fischer explained the county will be upgrading an exist-
ing roadway from CSAH 7 to CSAH 9. In doing so it will be
necessary to remove and replace a 60 foot culvert at County
Ditch Number Six with a 120 foot culvert to provide suffi-
cient length for proper shoulder width and side slopes.
However, because of the increased culvert length, the embank-
ment slopes will fill approximately 790 square yards of type
two wetlands. A map of the proposed area was viewed.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
Hay 20, 1992
Page 5
Schrantz stated County Ditch Number Six is a major ditch in
Andover.
Hr. Fischer indicated this project has been submitted to the
Corps of Engineers for a permit., This is not a DNR protected
wetland. It was his opinion that because this involved less
than two acres of wetland the Pollution Control Agency would
not get involved. Approximately 0.16 acre of wetland would
be affected. Mr. Fischer indicated the county requires
comments/approval from only the Corps of Engineers and the
LRRWHO.
Mr. Fischer went on to explain that any culvert replacement
will require a diversion channel during construction, which
will stay pretty much within the limits of the fill area.
In relation to the overall county maintenance projects in the
.future, Erickson queried how many areas within the LRRWMO
will the county be affecting. Hr. Fischer indicated it will
be approximately five per year.
Jankowski queried when the road is eventually constructed,
how much wetland will be impacted. Mr. Fischer stated
probably no more~ this culvert will probably be the only
thing affecting it. He reiterated the county's immediate
concern is obtaining approval for this project~ however, it
is also looking toward similar future projects and the
LRffiiMO's position on mitigation.
Schultz queried whether this process will require the LRR~~ro
to expend its finances in any way. Schrantz felt that yes,
there will be the need for a review process requiring the
submission of a permit application and $500 fee to cover
LRR~ro costs. Mr. Fischer indicated the Corps of Engineers
has exempt roadway maintenance projects from the permitting
process. In the case of the LRRWMO, it will be nearly
impossible to eliminate some impact on wetlands during a
construction project, no matter how small. Hr. Fischer
suggested the LRRWMO wait until there is a significant amount
of mitigation to deal with from a future project(s) and tack
this 0.16 acre mitigation project on to that. SchUltz
queried whether a developer could come to the LRRtvHO and use
the same argurnent~ should the LRRWMO treat the county any
differently than it treats a developer. Mr. Fischer
indicated Anoka County will be a regular customer. Mr.
Newman suggested the LRRWMO require the county to prOVide
adequate assurances that these small pieces of mitigated
wetlands will be replaced, perhaps through a letter of
credit, bonding, or in some other way.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 6
Schrantz and Jankowski agreed the county, unlike a developer,
will be here: we know where to find it. Mr. Fischer sug-
gested the LRm'i!.~O consider establishing a pOlicy of exempting
projects affecting wetlands if the impact is less than a
certain acreage or perhaps enroll these small projects in a
banking account to be mitigated at a later date on a larger
scale. Schrantz was uncertain if this board could legally
carry out Fischer's suggestions. Mr. Fischer confirmed that
now under the interim guidelines maintenance measures are no
longer automatically exempt.
Weaver stated this is an existing ditch served by a culvert
and queried whether there is a ditch law that would apply to
activities within it. Mr. Fischer stated that law would only
be effective if records show regular maintenance of that
ditch. He indicated although the ditch looks fairly clean,
he did not think the county has done ditch maintenance for
many years. Schrantz concurred, stating that farmers have
taken care of it.
Discussion continued on the board's legal responsibilities in
such a situation, especially during the interim regulation
period. Jankowski stated he would personally be in favor of
exempting the county unless the LRIDqMO is told it is not
allowed to do so. Schrantz stated the board can do that, but
we previously agreed every project would pay its own way so
as not to create a financial burden on the LRRWMO's limited
budget. Schultz stated these county maintenance projects
will still have to go to our Consulting Engineer for his
review. schrantz concurred, adding that engineering costs
will be either assessed to either the county or the
watershed. Schultz recommended the county submit the normal
LRRWMO application fee for review, expenses shall be taken
out of that fee, and the remaining balance returned to the
county at the proper time.
Mr. Fischer felt the county fell into two categories:
regular maintenance projects and major construction projects.
He preferred that the LRRWMO establish a poliCY whereby the
county would be automatically exempt for maintenance
projects, and perhaps Barr Engineering would not have to be
involved.
Erickson agreed with Mr. Fischer's suggestion that perhaps
the smaller mitigation acreage amounts could be banked toward
future mitigation projects. Mr. Fis.cher further suggested
perhaps the county could be allowed to enhance a project if
there would be no mitigation.
LRffiqMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 7
At the request of Schultz, Mr. Fischer reported how Anoka
County is treated in other watersheds, explaining that most
watersheds have a project review application which is filled
out, with the actual permit applied for by the contractor.
Schrantz pointed out the different budgets with which other
watersheds have to work. Schrantz felt the question is
should the LRRWMO treat the county the same as it treats its
own member cities, who currently have to get a permit for
projects affecting Class A and B waters. Schultz felt the
two entities should be treated equally.
Weaver felt the LRRWMO attorney should be asked to advise the
board on this issue: what is our statutory obligations. He
felt the county, not a contractor, should be required to
assume the responsibility of obtaining the proper permits.
Schrantz stated as the Local Governmental Unit
interim wetland regulations period, we must go
permitting process.
during the
through the
Mr. Fischer stated he would go ahead and submit an
application to the LRRWMO, along with the $500 fee, for this
project review, noting that he has already sent this project
to Barr Engineering. Schrantz concurred with that procedure
in that he felt it only right to treat the county the same
way the LRRWMO member cities treat themselves. Mr. Fischer
went on to request that the board look into the possibility
of handling the county projects, particUlarly maintenance
projects, as an exemption if there is minimum impact to
wetlands. Schrantz indicated perhaps the LRRWMO could
establish a minimum review policy, but cautioned that the
county be aware of the potential for costs.
Erickson queried whether the LRRWMO can allow an accumulative
banking process. He further queried of Mr. Fischer whether
the county has sufficient right-Of-way for the project. Mr.
Fischer indicated the county is buying an easement in order
to do this construction: the county is not buying any addi-
tional right-Of-way for mitigation. Schrantz noted this is a
county ditch: the LRRWMO just manages the water than runs in
it. He felt the county has a right to some right-of-way
according to law.
Schrantz reviewed how the LRRWMO would handle these projects:
Just as is required of member cities, an application and $500
permit fee will be submitted to the LRRWMO through the
respective member city, the money and project plans. and
specifications will be sent to the LRRWMO Deputy Treasurer
who will assign a number to the application, and the project
information will be sent to our Consulting Engineer who will
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 8
review it and
recommendation.
LRRWMO files.
report back to the LRRWMO with his
A copy of this material will be retained for
Weaver concurred the board should be consistent in its
approach to projects. Schrantz indicated this is consistent
with what developers, including members cities, must do now.
However, Schrantz felt the question still remains does the
county have to mitigate this proposed project: can it be
banked. Jankowski felt it is not reasonable to require 0.16
acre mitigation, adding that that amount could perhaps be
banked and added to a future project(s}. Schultz concurred.
Mr. Fischer asked the board to consider having a district-
wide permit. Schrantz felt the board would have to contact
the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) on how to handle
th is.
Schrantz stated for the present this project will be handled
the same as for city projects. In the future the LRRWMO will
contact BWSR for a procedure on which to handle Anoka County.
Erickson agreed the board should obtain the opinion of its
legal counsel on these issues.
Hotion was made by 1tleaver, seconded for discussion by
Jankowski, that IN LIGHT OF ANOKA COUNTY'S DISCUSSIONS, THE
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED r~lAGEMENT ORGANIZATION SHALL REFER
THE MATTER OF THIS 1;qATER ~!ANAGEHENT JURISDICTION IN COUNTY
WETLAND MATTERS TO THE BOARD I S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR RECOMMENDA-
TION ON TI-iE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION.
Jankowski stated he does not want to run to our attorney
every time the question comes up. This board has the respon-
sibility to exercise good judgement and should do so in this
case.
Weaver indicated he could appreciate Jankowski's position,
but felt in this case the LRRWMO is establishing its future
relationship with Anoka County. Our attorney is a recog-
nized, experienced authority in watershed matters. Weaver
felt Pearson will be able to properly advise the board on the
right course to take.
Erickson and Weaver agreed the question to the attorney
should be specifiC: What should the LRRWMO's answer to Anoka
County be in the matter of the ongoing request by the county
for encroachments into wetlands abutting the county highway
right-of-way on maintenance projects, including minimum and
maximum acreages. Can we set a minimum size?
VOTE: 4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
. "
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 9
Lake Monitoring Program
Mikkonen reported Tony Brough, Anoka County Soil and Water
Conservation District, provided the proposed contract for the
1992 ,Lake Monitoring Program to be considered by the board.
As indicated in Mikkonen's May 19, 1992, memorandum to the
board, the 1992 monitoring activities will be for Rogers
Lake, Lake Itasca, and Round Lake, with seechi disk readings
done on only Rogers Lake at this time. The cost will be $200
per lake and $35 for the seechi disk reading, for a total
cost of $635.00. The board indicated all the signatures
should be obtained on this contract and a copy returned to
the LRRWMO before the check is sent out.
Mikkonen also presented a fax transmittal just received from
Mr. Brough who submitted a letter of application from Chris
A. Lord, ~~oka County Conservation District Conservation
TechniCian, requesting the board's consideration in allowing
the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District to
serve as the LRRWMO's technical consultant during the interim
wetland regulation period. Mikkonen was directed to file
this application for future reference.
First Quarter Reports
The first quarter
received from the
first quarter report
the board the second
neeting.
1992 construction/project reports were
Cities of Andover and Anoka. Ramsey's
is still outstanding. Mikkonen reminded
quarter reports will be due at the June
Update on City of Ramsey Project #91-14
The board briefly discussed Ramsey project #91-14. Erickson
noted a March 15, 1992, response from our ConSUlting Engineer
indicating the revised plan does not meet the requirements of
the LRRWMO 1;qater Management Plan. Jankowski indicated the
city has created a sedimentation basin for outlet Pl. They
have eliminated outlet W6. However, he will contact Pete
Raatikka, Hokanson Anderson Engineering, who is working with
the City of Ramsey on this project, for further explanation.
Schrantz noted Mr. Raatikka's March 23, 1992, letter to
Skallman relative to Ramsey project #91-14, stating this
board needs a response from Skallman relative to that letter.
n153rd Avenue Extension, Public Water 2-111P, City of Ramsey
Jankowski explained the City of Ramsey has proposed an
extension plan for 153rd Avenue, intersecting with Armstrong
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 10
Boulevard. The project as proposed will fill approximately
two acres of wetland. The city is noW considering the
preparation of an environmental assessment worksheet.
Jankowski stated this is extremely important to Ramsey. No
LRRWMO permit application has been made in' that the project
is just in the designdstage: Ramsey may not do anything with
the proposed project.
Schrantz directed that this information, referring to a March
19, 1992, letter to Ramsey City Administrator Ryan schroeder
from DNR Area Hydrologist Tom Hovey, be filed for further
reference should future action be required of the LRRWMO.
Mobile Service Station Project APplication
Schultz provided a- recently received LRRWMO permit
application from the Mobil Service Station #05-EFQ, 702 Main
Street, Anoka, for a proposed groundwater remediation system
t-o be installed at the service station. He queried whether
Skal1man has to see each and every permit that goes through
this board. Schrantz stated our Consulting Engineer must
review all city projects plus those affecting Class A or B
waters. Schultz indicated he will then continue to send this
application and the $500 application fee received through the
proper channels. (See formal action further along in discus-
sion. )
OLD BUSINESS
Water Quality Records/Maintenance
Jankowski did not contact Skallman: therefore, no information
is available about which to report to the LRRWMO. This
agenda item will again be carried over to the June 1992
meeting. _
N~wsletter Article
Jankowski provided a draft newsletter article for publication
on the functions of the LRRWMO. The Administrative Secretary
was directed to retype it and send it, along with the article
from Weaver about the history of the LRRWMO, to 'the member
cities for insertion in their respective newsletters.
(Weaver left at 11:05 a.m.
responsibility as alternate.)
Schultz
assumed
his
. .', . ..
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
~!ay 20, 1992
Page 11
~10bi1, Service Station Project Application {Continued}
!10tion was made by Jankowski,
APPROVE THE MOBIL SERVICE STATION
THE CONSULTING EHGINEER'S POSITIVE
seconded by Erickson,
APPLICATION CONTINGENT
RESPONSE UPON REVIEW.
to
ON
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
Schrantz stated the Coon Creek Watershed has yet to consider
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan, directing that this matter be
carried over to the June meeting.
NE"tl BUSINESS
Wetland Conservation Act Certification for Burning/LRRWMO
Regulations
The board discussed how to handle the proposed burning permit
regulations. Members concurred the DNR should have
juriSdiction in this matter. Schultz indicated the proposed
resolution makes sense in that the LRRWMO is the Local
Governmental Unit.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE
THE RESOLUTION ADDRESSING THE WETLAND CONSERVATION lI.CT
CERTIFICATION FOR BURNING.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. r.10t ion carried.
Board Members to Serve on the Interim Wetland Review
Continued to the June meeting.
Set-up a Technical Review Committee for the LRRWrID
Continued to the June meeting.
Minnesota PCA Draft General Permit to Discharge Storm Water
re Industrial Activities
The board noted the receipt of a March 31, 1992, letter from
STS consultants Jeffrey A. Shopek and Theodore M. Frostman
relative to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency draft copy
of the general permit to discharge storm water associated
with industrial activiti~~_
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 12
Motion was' made, by Jankowski, _ seconded ,by Schrantz, to
RECEIVE AND.FILE THE MARCH 31, 1992, LETTER FROM STS RELATIVE
TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S GENERAL PERMIT TO
DISCHARGE STORM ~A~ER ASSOCIATED WITH ,INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 Certificate of Exemption
The board noted the receipt of an April 21, 1992, memorandum
from John Jaschke, Wetland Management Specialist for the
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, regarding a
revised Certificate of Exemption document for LRRWMO use.
Said information was directed to be filed for further
reference/use.
Wetland Technical Training Sessions
Members noted a May 15, 1992, memorandum from D'Wayne DeZiel
regarding upcoming wetland technical training sessions. It
was agreed each member would determine when, or if, he would
attend these training sessions and take care of his own
registration.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schultz, to ADJOURN
THE MEETING.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Time, of adjournment: 11:21 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
yt~
Hava Mikkonen
Administrative Secretary
~
. I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
-92
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO.
STORM SEWER AND STREET
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF
AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
92-4 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
WINSLOW HILLS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 074-92, dated
19 92 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
Kenko, Inc.
Hank Weiderna
Northdale Construction
for bids as set out in
May 19 ,
tabulated according to law
$528,229.35
546,786.23
576,534.20
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
Kenko, Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Cler~
to enter into a contract with KPiko Tn~ the
amount of $528.229.35 or 'construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
meeting this 19th day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
JUN 15 '92 15:42 T.K.D.A. & ASSOC.
P,l
TKDA
June IS, 1992
TO~ n. KINa. DUVALL, AHDEIISON
AND A.8ool~TE8, INCORPORATED
1100 MeMOli TOWIlR
+1.4 OeDAR ITRlil'
8AlNT PAUl.. MINN!aOT ~ 551 01.t140
PHONi:tlIillU_ ~AX:'IIilIOI.oOI3
ENGINEEAS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
Honorable Mayor and City Council
~dover,~esota
R.e: Winslow Hills 2nd Addition
City Project 92-4
)\ndover,~sota
Commission No. 10127
Dear Mayor and Council:
Bids for the above referenced project were received on June 15, 1992 with the following results:
Contractor
Amount of Bid
Kenko, Inc.
Hank Weidema
Northdale Construction
Richard Knutson, Inc.
Barbaro!!a and Sons
Arcon Construction
Ryan Contracting
$528,229,35
546,786.23
576,534.20
598,892.75
603,467.00
614,490.93
614,107.75
$592,346.00
Engineer's Estimate
It is recommended that a contract be awarded to the low bidder, Kenko, Inc., in the amount of
their low bid of $528,229.35.
A complete Tabulation of Bids is attached for your infonnation.
Sincerely yours,
JLD:j
Enclosure
. JUN 15 '92 15:43 T.K,D,A, & ASSOC.
UI to
B
f~1 ~
.Q I
';I
~I~ i
'tl
0
~U g
~
~ I
.ll
..
II
...
~ I
.
.
..
R
<<
~
I
! a
~ ~
j I
8
II
..
III
..
:::
'"
III ...
~I ~
i~ " i
~il~
r~ i ..
lid!
e
Sgg88888g88ggggg~gggg88ggggg~~;~tg
. . . . . . I . . . , I . . . I . . . . . t . . . . . . , t . . I .
8g~:~~~og~23:g~~~:~~g:~~gg~:ag~~::
~~.~~w~=~~O".~~~~~~~o~~.~~..~~ ~I~
... ...... III .. II .. "" ... '" .. .. Or, .. '" II II ... .. .. to '" I ""
~ ~.~~.~~~~ ~~~~;~~~ ~~~. ~I~
ICII
,
g8ggggg8gg8ggg8g~g~8ggg~gggg~gS~
oa~~~~.QN~~.N~.~~N~.QMO~OO=~~~OO
O~~"M"~~~~N~~NN~~...o~~=o~~. ~
~. ~ ~ N"
~ ~
~ggggggg8ggggggggggg8gggg8ggggg:l:
I . . . . I . . . I . . I , I . . . I . . , . I . t . . . . . . f .
~gggg~~=~~~ggg~~~~~~g~~g~~~~~g~~I~
N.9.~.~~NNa~N~~~MO~.=NNN"M..~~~~I~
"" .. .. 'II .. II .. '" ... II..... .. "" .. .. to ... "" .. .. ... ... ... ... '" ..
~~~~~~~N~NH ~ ~.~~~=~~ ~~~~N";~
I'"
I
ggggg~g~gg~gg8gggg8ggggggggggg8~
OOGaONN..~~~aNN~~~~~c~~oonOC~Q~O
~ONNNN~N~N~~~~M~~~~~~O~~N~~.~ ~
~M ~ ~ ~~
N
~:~2~~=~~~~:~g~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~'~
. , , I ~ . , I . . , . I . . , I . . , , , I . . . fl. . . , I ,
:~s~~~~~g~=~~taa:~~~~M::~S~:N~~~gl~
~~~~~.~~Q~.~~~.~~~W~~~"~~No~.mN~I~
'" .. ~ '" '" .. " ~ "'.." Ilo .. . ~ .. .. .. """ ~ Of .. "lit Iro I '"
~ ~~==.~~~~" N~~~~=~~~ ~"~~~ ~I~
IN
,
I
~~S;:~=~~~:~S~~~::~~;=~~~a~~~~~~
.COO~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~Q~=.~~..a~ci~c
:~~~~M ~~~~~~~.~~~..~ S~~QN
M ~ N
QoooaaooooaoooaooooaOOOOOQOOOOQOIC
OOOQCOOocooooaOOOQOOOOOQooOaOQCOIO
I I . I I I I I . I I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . . . , I .
gg~g~g:~~ggg:g~~g~~~g:gg~g~:gg~~I~
OC.~N"m~~~m~N~~~~OM~.mON"~~.O~~~ ~
~ '" '" ~ ~ " .. lit . "lit.. " '" '" ... lit lit '" lit ... '" .. ... .. .. I "
~~M.~~~N.~~ ~ ~~~~;~.~ "~~"m~:=
I'"
I
gggg8~ggg8gggg8ggg~8ggggggggggg~
o~~~~o~o~o~a~~.~Qci~~Qcgooo~~.~.o
gg ~NN~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~.o~~~
~" ~ "
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~===~~~~
OOOQQOOOQcooaaooooaoooooooooooea
ocaOOOOOOQcaoogCOOOOOCOOOOQQOOOO
~~oo~~~~~~aooo~a~~~~~~~O~~~M~O~~
~N~n.~~~~N.NN~.~"'.~~ ~ IIlN::l~.X
~ ~N ~.~ ~ '" ~M
I Se ~= ~
........ ~~oN~II~~ l~e!iUii~
19~~~=~~~~..~.~~777 ~n~1 i 2
~11111'11..t1~~.IO...N I-l I-l III .
I 0:::l~..._0::l...~ I I I "'NNIIlM gig ~M 0
..~ ~"'t1N N~:::l~~lllllllll III .. 1'l/l:I!iJil~1
~=1~===1lI~1ll1ll1ll1ll1ll1ll =lll~.. ~~~~
CIlCllllllll~lIlnllllllgr.!!!!.. Ill;
~~"'IIl~~IIlIl1~~ MMMIIllll O~O~1'l ~1I1~S
l!aiii!~iill::::afim;aer&lmm~~~i!!
I ;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~m
Ulll.......lll....~~:::l~~ga.alll:::l....B~
"N~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P,2
g~~~gggggg~gggg:~
. I , . . . . , I I I . . . . I .
g=~.~~~g~g~~:~~I~
C7\.....l~,..~N"'~~N.....MI...
III. " .. '" .. .... .. ... ... . I ..
1f)~~tl')Np')CO ~ 1"'4.....1;;
I"
I
g~~~gggggg~gggg
o~..;Ili~~c~OO~~O~rl
~ ~~IIl::~O~~ "'N.
. ~
g~~ggg8gggggggg:~
, , , . fl. . . , , I I . .. I
gQ~goggg~~ogog~IN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~
MY\C""~tl')CO C ritl')MI....
tit '" ~ I G\
I
J
I
g~~ggggg~8~ggg~
, I . . . . I . , . . . . . .
...0......0000111"'......0
1Il...~M~..tlO...1O Itll'l'"
filii f'l... :::NN
:gg;=~~=~~g~~~~J~
, . . , , , I I . I . . . . . I .
:~~~~~~~~la~~~~~:~
~.~~~~~~~~~N~~.l~
" '" '" ... .. III lit .. "'.. lit '"
"'.~~NC\I~~ ~ ......,I~
I
I
:;l~:gri:;t:;~~~~~~~~:
NC:";~":"';N.";~~~~~o
C1D...""....N.....NlO~ .Nt-
N M"'4~Nf\l
OoaooOOOOOOOOOOIO
CQOOOOOOQOOOOOCIO
I I . I I . . . I , I . . . . I .
OO~.ooaeoO~O=COI.
~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~:~
. lit .. .. lit '" ... ..... .. ... r .
"~:!lMM"'Ql ::l "'~IO,~
I M
I
I
gg8ggggggg~ggg:::
. I If. . . . . . I . . . .
ONW')~ooaOOO"'OCllll\n
o...t......OCooa'" \6)anr-
III ....~::l"''''
~~!!!!~12sf~U~iU~1S
aCOOOOooaooooco
OOOQoacooOOOOOO
N~.n~~.a~.";roio~.fOO
N....... ,.. lO\Q!lr,QI
"'Qct ,.. '"
N'" ~.
i ~ ~ ~
~~~ sa
mng~Uaaa~
!~~"sa~ma&~~e~i
~~!~sBa~liwlj~~
Ifl~~~;~ii ~e ft~a
i.. ·
I~O.'C1Clt'll...~~
\OW~\#CD,...;"'",""",,",,~,,
H<,(I'l.Il>~~",,,,~::I~Hl=~
!II
~J
~Ii
! I
d I
~U
III ~
~I ~
i* !; I
~ji~
S"!i ..
jhll
JUN 15 '92 15:44 T,K.D,A, & ASSOC,
~ i
'"
II
g
!
..;
~ I
~ !
.
i
<<
co
~
III
~ ~
~ ..
Ii
~
..
PI
"
o
....
gggg~=:8S8~ggg8ggggg;~~g~~~J:
~ . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . I . . . , . I I .
oo..~o~~~~~~.~oo....oo....~~PI.N~I..
~~~~~~~~~~~=~:~~g~~=~~~g=:MI=
.. .. ... .. .... ....." III .. .. .. '" '" ... 10 ...
....~ NN....~ .........~.....I'l. ....NN 'a
.... ~........ I
,
I
I
gggg~=~~~g~ggggggg~ggggggg~
oo~o.c~~~~~~~Ocoo~oaeM~~~~~
~~O~""NNNNPl.~~"~~o~~~o~"",,~~
..~~ ~~~.~~~~~ ............
......800..8o..~goo..OO....OO..........OI~
coo aoo CON aoooaaooo~~~oo~ ~
. I . . . . , . . . I . . . . t' . . , I . . . . , t I .
aoocaMoa~~~~acooacoog~~~~~g .
~~aON~=~~~~rl~O~QOOOOO~~~.~.I~
~M~~~~.~~o"~~a~OCO~N"~~~~w 1M
.. '" .. "" 'iii.. ........ -. , .. .. "'.. I ..
..... ~::l"". N....~~~PlI'l. NN'~
.... ........ l~
I
ooooaooaDo~cooooaooooaooooo
OCQOOQCO~O~~OOooooaaQOOOOQO
o~OO~~aN~~~~Oa~ooaa~O~~~QCM
~~O"""""NNNPI.~~O~""OOO~~~~~~
I'll'l~~ =~~~=~~N....
~
j
~~~~O~"ON"~.~O"""".~..""PI~N~.I""
.~~.""~~~~~~~~~.ON."".N~~N~~. c
.~t~~~~~C~O~.~~O.M~O~.~~~~O~I~
· ~~..~N"~~.O~~....~~~.~~~.~~PI ..
N ~~N~.~.M~~~N~~~~M~O"~"~~ /.
II, ... Iilo III II... ..... to. ... ... ... .. .. .. ... .. ...
":4 f:~;::'" .....r4....Nwt"'''' rlNr4 I;::;
I~
I
I
:~~~:8~S~~~=~~~~~~~~~=~~=g=
.~~~~~~~~.~~~~O~~~~ON~~~.~~
.~~~"~~NN~~~O.~.r4~.~M~NM~~
NN~. ~~~.~~~~~ ~~....
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQIQ
OQQOQQOOOQOCOOQOOOQooOOgaaOIO
. . . , . ~ . . . . . . I . . . I . . . . t I . . . . I t
0"8"0~OS~~O~O"0000"OO~""".~~IN
~~~~~~:~:;~~~~~g~~~~g~~~~~N;~
.. '" .. .. "" -. .. '" .. .. III .. .. <II .... I II
....~ ~~~~ .........~....PlPl. ....1'1 /g
I~
I
ggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
oooo~~aN~~Q~Oo~ooo~oaoo~~c~
OQOO""NN~~..OOCOOOQOOW~Q~.
~~~~ ~~~.~.~~~ ........
~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~=~~~=~~~~tt
OOOQeoooaOOOCOOOOOOOOQCOOOQ
OOCOOOQOOOCQOOOQaoooo"~~~~~
~~~~O~.ON~~=~N~~~~M~NN~~~O~
~=N~~~~= ~.
,II II
!g ;611 :ee~
!a~xllllllll~H~ :Ies~:~fla
~~..!!!!!!!!la8fi~~!!!!;~!:~
~~II~~tltld~tltl!llli~"~~;;;;!1
I~~ ~~gg9S~g~~~~ :::~ Hfi
~~II~~~~~~~~=~~aj~~~~~i61!~
!
~N~.~~~.~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~
P,3
OOVlVlOOOOOO,../..
oO,...,...QOOv)W'lOIItJ C\I
.. t I It. . . . . I I .
~~:~;!:~a:fJ:I~ :;
P1P1l'1t1S""Ir1f-oG\P"I1Il 0\ It'l
..; ,.; .; ..; 0'" ~ <i N I ,.: ..'
'" tit .. . 0 ,...
,.... ~
I
I
OO~lI)OIl1QOOO
OIn~""''''W'tP''lO''g
.. .. .. . I , I. t .
"'Pl~""..~Vll:lg
~ ::l
~~~~~~~~~~I~I~
gc~~:a~:~"~I~ ~
....~.~~N"'....~.,I.... ~
.. .. .. III .. .. '" "'. '" ..
f'IJ"'....-,..-4"....... ..
., .... · l::l ::;
I
I
'iggg~~;~~g
. , It. .. . . . ,
tl'tMNI"J. '0 "'.&tJo
~N"
~
"O~~"""~~~l"j~
NNQG''''IfINOo.~cJ\,... ,...
. . . . I . . t .. ..,. ..
t')C'H.e,pof~.e.M\Q I co G't
~~<J\."~N.."I~ N
"NPI~O~~"I" N
.. ....... '" .. .. r, ..
~ :::N~"':;1~I~ l!:
..... ~
I
I
;:J:l!O::l::;';~~~l:i
...i...i";Q':";~~",,,,:
"N..
::l
000"0000"0''')0
DOOOOOCOCOIC 0
.. , I I . . . .. . I I' .
g~~e~:;g~t3~I= :
O"'CO\OO"'G:>CJI"'OI~ M
.. ...... '" .. III '" 110 I... ..
'" "~~~~PlONJ~ N
PI .::::l ~
I
I
gggg~ggggg
.. .. , , , . .. .. .. .
OIl'tC'l\l....,......c,.,o
Vl ONo
.... .... '"
tj~tt~~i!lU~
OOOCliOOOOgg
OQOOOOOIt)O~
.. .. . I .. .. . . . t
~~~~~~g~~N
CJlO\....... ~
........~ ., ....
to
; ....Il
!~ ~ E:!
"~ ~: ~~S~
5 m~utl agM
~~I;I~i~~1
~g ~~~~;~~
'iiIUiU;!
o
f"4N~"W'>>~"'.GIIr1
~"
l .
.~
=5
~Sa
, .JUN 15 '92 15:44 T.K,D.A, & ASSOC,
~ I
) ~
..
o
g
~
~ .~
; i
3
J
-
!
q
I I
~
..
l'l
..
0
M
.. S!
~I ...
...
.
:!l
!
~~ :::
T
~I ~
a OJ i ..
iill r ~
i
..
I
g~2~gg~ggggggggg8888gggg8g8g~gggJ~
' I . . . . . .. . . . .. . I . . .. I . . . .. . I . . . . . , . . I .
ogg8oo:~~gggggg~g=o~g=gggg~~~g~g'~
8o~~m~~wo~~~.N~""'''~'''.~o.~~'''~N~N...I~
~ " II, '" " ~ " ... - .. " '" to to -. " .. ... to It .. 'III ... "'" IiII .. '" "I "
~=l'l"'==~N.Nr1r1N"r1..~~~~"~ ... l'l~~Nl'lI~
I~
I
ggggg8gggggggg8ggggggggggggg~ggg
o~aoo~aOOC~QOO~~..~~oooo~~~~~~~~
"Ol'll'll'll'll'll'll'lMM~~~~~~~~~O"".OONl'l N
.... ... .. llllO r1 r1
~w ,.j ,.j
ooco~naQooaQoogOOOOCQOooo=~aooogl~
~~~1'1 .~'1~"~~~~~~~~~~"'~~"1~~~r-;~II!~~C: r ~
"Ol'llll.~W\O~~l'lIO~~"~N~~O~~:::l~~~""~OOGI~
g~~~~..;~~~:::l~.~::~~:~~Il'l~N~~:~~~...I~
... lit II " ... " ... " ...." " .. III '" to to ... .. ... .. " to '" II I "
~ l'l"'~"''''.''.N... l'l~M.....IO. ",.j~Nr1N'N
r1M .l'l.N... ,.j I~
IN
I
gg~:t;~=~=!~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~gg~
O~~~NN~N~~~~~~~~rl~O~NNNNN~~O~~~~
O~~N~~M~..~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~
Ii! l'l :!l .. N N
~gggg8gggggggggggg~gggggggggg8~gtg
. I I . . I . . . , , . . I I. , , . . . . . . I . . . . . I . I '
NO....O~O~ooc..ooo..o~o~..~oooo~..~o..o,~
~~~~~~~~~=~~:~:~~S~g~~g8~~~~~~~~:~
" '" ... .. " ... '" .. 'III",.. '" " , .. .. ... .. ''III " ......" 10 I '"
...."~~...~~l'l,.j... ~..~"~"IOr1" ,.j..N~'l'l
"""~ tr)t\I'"~.... I..,
IN
I
I
~gg~gggggggggg~ggg~gggg8ggggg~~~
N~.~~~.~O~~~N~~~O~N~~OOOCC~O~~~~
~O~~~~~~~.~.....~~~~O~QQOON~ ~
~.. ~ ~,.j~~
gggg8gggggggg~ggggggg~~ggggg~ggg:~
. . . I . .. . I . . . . . . . . , . . . I . . . . , , . . . . , I I
gg~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~:~~~S:::l~S~~8~g~~IS
aO~~~~~.~~~.~..~.~~.~~~M "N~~~~~I~
........"""',, ."............ .......""'''1...
"ON~OIO."N'" ~..~"l'l~N ~~......IO....~
NN ... l'lNl'l...... I.
'N
I
I
gg~~~~~~~:=2~::gggg8g~~~g8gg~gg~
'g8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~o
=a ~ ~ ~
~~
3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~===~~~~
OOOODOOOQOOOCooOoooocaOOOOOOQOOO
OgOOOQQOOQCOOQCOOgCOOOOCQOOOQDOO
~~OO~~~~~QOOODQO~~~~.~~arlN~~~~CO
~~~~~ ~~.~~~~~~~=~~~ ~ ~~~~~:
N N~
I .....la~~H~ ~SiS~S~
'"'.......,......... l.OQ)Ct\f. i !
.N.!~ON.~ "'NNl'll'lm ~ ~
,~7177~~1~~~~~~~~.!.~ ~ ~1!51~li~
I ON.....CN.,.j I I I NNNl'lM =jR ~l'l
.......,...~"NNN.!.~.~ l'l
=:=II====~~::=12===~~ ~ .s B~~
liiI~Ojlll~~~~~=loellll 1Il111 e
g~~~~lllllll/)~lll M~l'l~l'l O~C~~ ~::l::l
!~~ii~~iiii::::!~~!m~f~;sm~~ml~;
I~~~~~~~t~~~~~~e~~~~~~i~~~~~e~~il
ll!1.............~~~1.~; . .1.....
18~....~...~...M""""8 . ~~...~
"N~.~~~.~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P.4
OOO..O~OOggQaoO.Q
aaooooaaao~Oooal~
. . . . I . . . . . . . I . . I .
g~~~o~gg~g~~Og:l~
O~..,.j~..~W..~~l'l~~~I.
""'"..,,,... "10,...,
Nl'lIONl'lNMW "MMMI~
N l'l ... I ~
gggggggggg~ggg~
o...i~~~ooooo..;~oSo
gr1~"'~P:12=:::~ l'l
,.j ...
o~a.~cOoo~aaoool~
O~M~~g.Q~O.g~CaIO
. . . . I . . . . r , I . . . I .
o~a~o~:g~~~~~~=I:
~~~~~~~~..~..~..o~lo
.."....~NfII...f-t... ,.: ~.P) r M
NN ... 10
l~
I
I
8~~S~~g::;~~&1g~~~
'^~..1...i~,.:..:ro:~..~..o
::l ",.j~.i2:::::~ ~N"
ooooooocOoooaOOfQ
OQOCOOOQCOQOOOOIO
. I. . . . . . . . , . . , . I '
OOCNCOOOoaoooool~
~~~~:m~~~~~~=~~I~
" .. " .. .. ... '" ... .. "I ...
~~N"'N"'" . l'l.'"
.... M I ::l
I
I
QOOOOQlloaOooooao
OOQQQOOOoacoooo
O~cD~ooo~~V;cOO";O";
LIl",.jNNl'l"O~~ ....~
N M.~::lNN
o~~ccOOOoceOOOOfa
C~N=OOQQOO~O=OQIW
. I . , . . . , , I I . . . I I I
~~==~~~g~~=:~~~I~
~~.~~.M~~..N~O~IO
.. '" .. ... .. .. .. .... " "I ..
."~NNl'l.. ~ ,.j..I~
"'''' : ~
I
I
g~~~ggg8gg~8g8~
~~~~~~~~g~~;~~g
N tr).It)~rolN
~~nu=~~;.'l;.'l;.'l~~==~
OOOQOOOOOOOOOOQII
aOOOOCOOOOQCOOQ
Nwi.nNo\~";iIO~~o,,*...;oo
N...... '"' "''''10
MOO ,. trI
t\lN I"'f..
r: l:l~
ijii~l~ I~
Imu! ~Ia!~:
ImmP,ihhl
1~~~~:~i2 Sfiftg~~
I · . ·
'IrQ.'orlll~..,."=a
..Ql)...'-.....~\AI...~t"I......;II
...N....~..,..~~~::l:::l::l::=:!l
. ;UN 15 '92 15:45 T,K,D,A, & ASSOC,
III I
t!j ~
,.Q 1 g
f~' 1:
0
"il s
hi A
...
~ i
"
.:I
~ I
II
i
. !
..
I
!
q
i I
.
o
Pl
o
,.oj
~
i; ;
j..~E
~18~
~~j: "
nn r
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~
ggggoa~~N=:gggggggggg~=~~.~r=
PlPlPlPl~Pl~~~Pl~.~o~ooo~~o~~~.~ ,~
... " ... " "... ""'" '" ... ... " .. .... I "
~~ ~~O~ ~".~~.~~ "N~ ,.
,.oj N,.oj,.oj ,:::
I
~ggggggggggggggggggggggggg~
. . I . . . I . I . ~ . I I . . . I . . . I . . , , I
aQOO~ON.~~OQooaeoooooooaOON
0000,.ojC\lC\lC\lC\lPl.~0000080oo~0~..
PlPlPlPl ~o~.o ..~ ...,.oj...
r1..t '"".......~f\I
8g~g~::8:~~8g~~~~gggg~=~gg~'~
. . I . . . t I . . . . . . I I . . I . . , , I. . . r .
OaN~~~.~~~~.~NNN~OOOOPl~.~~OI~
~ "'~~N~~_,.ojPl_~~C~Pl~C\l,.oj~t')~C\l.~C\l'O
N M~Plrl~."'..~~.C\l~~~~"'N,.oj~~PlN I.
'" ... .. ... "" Ill" '" .. ... " III 110 "'.. I .
...::; ::l::l::l~ ,.oj,.oj....N~..~ Oft'): ~
1
I
gg~g~~~~~=~gg~~~~ggg8~~~gg~
o~'~~~~.~~~.~~~NN~QO~Q.~o_o~~
~ ,.oj~"',.ojNNNM"~~NO~Pl~"~ ~OO~.
N M~ ~~~~~~=~N ,.oj......
gg8gg8ggg~gggggggggggg~gg8~,g
. . . . , . . . . . . , I . . . I "' , . I . . . t '. .
8o~gS~:~:~S~ggggo~cgg~=~~~SI~
N~~~~O~O~~~~~NOO~~i.~~~"o~~I~
..." ......"..... II to " '" ... ... .. " II ... ...
,.oj~ "o..~. ,.oj"-~"'PlN~ N,.oj /0
N ",.oj,.oj 1::1
1
8g8gggggg~ggg~ggggggggg~ggg
. . I I . . It. . . I . , , . . I I . . t I . . I t
oaOO.ON.~~~~aoooo~CCOO~Qao~
O~~ONPl""""~~oooo~~oo~~.o""",
C\l ~~ ~~=.~~::I~~ M'"
00000~000008ooooooaoo~~~~~01~
OCOO~~N~~QO QOOOoooco~~~~~o ~
t . I I . . I , . . I . . I . . . f. . I I . . . , I I I
OQ~Q~~.M~~~~~ow~oo~.o~.~~~~.~
~~~~S:~~=~~~~~=~:~~:~~~~~~~I~
II '"" lit ... II '" .... '" '" ... .. '" ... .. .... I ...
C\l~ ."N. ,.oj,.ojPl~,.ojt')N" N,.oj I...
,.oj N,.oj,.. I ~
I
g8gg~~~~~~~8gggggg8gg~~~~gg
.ooa'o.~.~.~~~~'~N~C~N.O~~~~~N
~w QNN~NM.~~ ~~M~.M~~~~O..
~~ ~ ~~~~~::I~~ 1"1'"
~=~~~~~~~~~~~~==~~==d~~~~~=
gg8ggg~gg8ggggggggggg~~~g~~
~~~~Q~~ON.~.~N~~~~~NNN~.~~~
~~N""N~. "_,.oj
. .OlN,.oj
Iii Ii
;'1111111111 a" li:I!::I,;
~!:i~!~!!!!!:I:fi~~!!!!~!::1
~aDfi~tl~~tl~~dJ~!ftii:~=;rrl!~
,a~;.gaQgg~gg~~w~~ht~~a~~~;~
BI~~~~~~~~~~=~~eftBa~~aa5~B~
~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P,5
~~""OOOOO"'O/Vl
00000,00000 0 ~
. . . I . . I , , , I' ,
~~~:~S~g~gl~ l;
rt...~~~~~~,,"t:"1 ~
"',.oj~NN~.NI_ ..
,.oj ~ N ., 1::1 III
' 1
I
000000"'000
OOoa..,ttJrOQC
N""';aO";';~C;;~c
ONO
N 0
,.oj
000000....00 10/..
aOOoaaC,,",OCiJIt1 '"
. I . . . . I , I . I. .
~O~~~~~aOOI; g
~~~':'tft~~~~I"1. ~
,.oj1tl::?N~N~"'la ~
I
gggg~~:!lggg
. . t . , . . . . I
iN""rt~.",~U')..o
"'NO
...
0000000000'0/0
caOOOClCOk')ltIio 0
oa..;o.;oaONNf,.; r-:
..IlIIb,.ojO.~Pl"'I~ III
,.oj O~~,,~Ol~O ~ _
'II . .. ... III ... II .. I... '"
"..,...f'4""NN....NIC ,.,
P'i ~ "I . pot =
'''' ~
I
,
oooooQOOOo
Og~ONO"'DW)O
";~...t.f"aO~c~~
~N~
..
"Oot)oa080001~/~
000"'00 a"'OIO ,..
O~Q..4.oaC;;Nolc..: ~
::1.~~~~}!~~=:fJ :
... .. " '" II. ... ... ... I. ..
.~NC\l::fN~,.ojI~ 3l
ft') CI1: M II)
I
oar--ocooooo
OO.MC'lOr-a..,o
N~~....lfi~c:i";o
~No
.
=~ttlf!l~Ul:lrl~
0000000000
aOOOOCl0M10fPJ
. , . f , . I I I .
=~~:!:=:g~~'"
~~.._- ~
"',.oj~ ., ,.oj
,~ · ~J
i~8[: !Is
Ulip_U
'lilMlm
o
~ N "'.... V) .. ,... . CJt. ...
~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Howard
June 15, 1992
Amending Schedule of Bills
During the processing of invoices last week, an invoice was
accidentally lost and therefore not included on the schedule
of bills. The Finance Department requested and received a
duplicate invoice on Monday. Since it is three weeks until
the next City Council meeting, the Finance Department would
like the invoice approved this evening along with the
schedule of bills.
The invoice is from Johnson's Sanitation and is for the
removal of trash at the recycling building. The invoice
totals $456.89.
If the City Council adds this invoice, the motion for
approving the schedule of bills should be as follows:
"Motion to approve the schedule of bills dated
June 11, 1992 with the addition of Johnson's
Sanitation in the amount of $456.89, bringing
the total of approved claims to $693,146.25."
r-'.I!;:JI="'::
'r{ii~~- '. ,--,~--
~.' . . "'. ,~...~M~
,
!.
,
.
1460 93RO LANE NORTHEAST. BLAINE, MlNNESOTA 5543(
(612) 784-7390 l ~
\' i i
l
R. NELSON ENGINEERING
, ~
June 11, 1992
'I ~I~ ~6i~2EO
,Mr. Kirk Corson
Hokanson Development, Inc.
9174 Isanti Street
Blaine, MN 55434
;-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dear Kirk:
}
1 am responding to your request to address t~e issues raised in the JUlie 8th
Raatikka and the June 10th Windschitl Iette~ regarding Pheasant M~1dows.
! ;
. ,)
According to the City topo map (attaqhed) there is no natural drainage
from the south through your Lots 6, 7 ,& 8, Block 2. The planned rear
yard fill creates a rear to front drainage patt~m on these lots and thus
prevents drainage onto the Ashford ~eveloP!nent Corp property.
. :
, ,
The drainage of the two southerly Lo~ frontjng on Jay Street is in
accordance with the comprehensive drainage: study of that area. The
increased runoff from those two lots following development is more than
offset by the elimination of tributary area el~where within the plat a~
iridicated on the attached drawing.: :
r
..
; .
The alignment of Killdeer Street can be moved to the east so the dimension
between Killdeer and Jay RIW lines ~itl be ~73 feet at your southern plat
line. The existing house location on ~ay limiJs the lot widths to the south to
80 feet. thus requiring 143 feet in depth. Tht lots to the west must be a
minimum depth of 130 feet per City ~ode add we arrive at 273 feet total.
Prior to you incurring expenses to ml:\ke thae change, I would like to
review the Ashford Development ptaq tosee~why a change is necessary.
, "
I
Please call if you have any questions.:
;
!
i
. .
i
,
Sincerely,
~4{~
Roger W. Nelson, P.E. '
"""-.' ."-.'
7-
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
f
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
"
1:),
.)( .l.,
~
~I
~
\.
\)
~'
.... . ..~--...._-
"t \U
\) 'f
~"
~
:
...,
'" I \0,
/ /
I I
I /
I \
I \
I '...........'i(
I .')( I'
.{" ,
.~
~
~~~,
o
j(
,
\1
,
, ,
~d
~;
. 1\ ~
1
.
;
.
. ,
!
i
"
\ .
\..
'--,
'\
\
\
\
.'
......."'r..I".,,,.,',..."...,"'.r,....,t.,~~~_.._,J.. .,
~'::~i:.: :',; ", Y.i1;i"f:~,: l~t~~J"~~ijt~~i~ ;~}~o/'" 'i:i~~0J.ii~"i~(r~~ '~~~~1\i;:~.'
' ;'~'I ..,..~ '..ll;;:.;'..'.:,i,~l~'~. ';, )1i"~!tl~}'F..!:yi' ,}l,:~y;,\~~'1,' _
- , "I '"t't' , ~.~"f'-.., I ~ ;'1.
i~~ i'~ 'l' W ~ '. '.;\" \"'-":';ij!1' '-'"',
~':~'''' .;.r'fJ' ~-:, . "'r.";;~ ~ ,.,t",j~\.. J
' . ..I-~. . 'r.ofl '" .... ~~~.jrl~? ~ ;.t. ~ II
' ;t },,\ '~':~";j; : H~ '~~;:{f.l!['f';;: 1:~1; ! ,1' ,~~'fJ}~.(~'"
: '~I/. ...... ,.....~~ "'~1 ";. ./. , a'~t.~-
J ,/ ~1!i.;-..:ri~.[:'\:'~,Nf"f:~..'~.,,.;..jt~liib~'?~~fr,~:\F 17" -;:.:,..,
' "I.~"'" -.,.,' ",/. PJ;f~I~~~,ll, r~>"
,.{ ql. ., .i, ~1~!1i: IJ,,~"'1I"'~,~, '---...~J--].., '-'-.,
7:u ::'V ?\. ;~, '!.~ .:;>r."''T',,
~ ;'. ~~~J~~;r;, Jj~lli./~f,~\!~lg:j' ~~'i~{~~ K~:~fl~~"'J~':} I I I I
~~~J:' "f't)l/I'ilj "''''~j! Mi\'~.i~':,,',
. ~llJ"... "~4r"~:" a...... " I\;'
' ~.~~... 1hIl~: '.' .,'.. '.. ..... _"____ _",_,,_. ,. ..... _, ..._ ..
..f' ,:l . .~'~ '" ~~~')~!",1~~J~:~~r~.'~!~Jf~:~,:;: ~rTrJ]ln U f.: j....!
1'.11'''', f.i~"I~:"I:' r,q;'I"""'."'-! . 11. [/"j'[/;! -1: ,1 :
. t "'-"' I~~I . &. ~'I.(' .. ,0 r ,. I ;
I, i"f" ...,'-.. . , , . I j' :
'~ '\'/ "I':!'~';~';\I. '\ .. '. I >j"l\ 'i i: ~
:' l!i ~,' .<;.. :~k~~~~:~!;:\l~t~ ":~1:~:, "S) II '. I,' .
. ~ 'I-'(i';- ..... "'~"''''''''' '~'..<<r~"a~._ I.. "
;e....'r';;,I.'.... '~~~'~ 1'''1Fh~ ,\'\...;......; ~ ~'_"';. '1']'''-) ,
']': '~~\:. ~"'I\'!- - r~'~!t;"!, ;"'~'!'...'." ,"'rl4 ! . . j'
'; ~i~:;, "~~'~ .~ ,.< ,J"t"\~,.~.:~I. ']E'" '01, ,. " ',:;
J, "I~" .....-.; , . ," '"'\ " . f ~ . "~t.'rrlt.. I' f' .
~;..fli:.'1;~IJ.~~'~~.j,f~~~., -~7i~.T~ .'..);,,:,~ i' ':;'~;;'~-rr'n",;rl"7"7". ,,"-:' ),:
. ~L' ',j~n"1:1, ".~~~~ :i:'~,r-' ',... ."1:,'~' i ~l'?!.t. _, y,' .'..
;::;'.!u.....". "''''~ ., ".. ~--t?}~J'f~:'::-; :'Or::r;: I .\" J'J I"
~l , '?:.~ ';t~!\'(J1. ~ ~ !ffi,,:t.~: ,i;~~I;~ii:jr.'I.'i', '!~'!it .. J. , . <0'1 / ,
., ."1J'~ ~~l '~f:; ~. J"r:.::; ,IXi'l ~~m'i7 ..., .
: .;'~~i'~.i-'r.' ::''' ~ . 'f!t~l.,~ ,.1.~ .t}n~1 Tt~., /..
1~~~~}?;~0%1 ~ "~':., 7:. ',H., .,.',"i, V)!
i. !.~ "i~m..~.: ~l'1.i1,j'J . '. \ ~\~i'l>\\.f,u ;n-11rn f.J n ~".' ~ l. ~~\'i "ntr.it~"!rx.T>, ( I I
l' ,~f".J.~..,t:;I;a ~~i~tl.&j' :T-~T' '\.:~:, :'';jI~r:'~1;.. /;-;('/l
~~~l{,r.i~;, ~:f ~: .'...' : ,,' J~l ~.r~' '-,' ",' i).......
{!""'f."'.. :....\" .Jl.~';.";'1 ; 1"'l c;J.TI'. I,', , r: ',~". :'lJt.;':~.:<' I ~~"... ",," ~
' .'.~~'.'. ..'.~ ,;',':,, II "" I 0 I "f'~ . ,.' .: .;. "", _,
. ';;'f~~;~\ ;ft;s'Y:U ~!::i':' ~,r ',I': ~. ""~:~: '~'I'~:'; .
~#~~.. ~'<:l':' .'.,,! ",,~ ~ ~''';f;'X . '~""', ~.~ ~':
,.~,. --,-."./,.,....,;: 1r"~'~"i:N . \2BE" ~j "-
. ;'rr::}),i:..'<::'/'r~:i:f . ~..<h.;i,;.\~, ~ ~~.' ' .~ ~ ~i~r+rr
":~/f~~~~(~.~.~.. '~:~i.'T~:~. jO,,~.~.~I"~~':~":~ I". ': ...~..' .
. )"':!J~,<l.~~"::1 r f T 1,"1 'IT IT: I'.rr,; J . ~, : ';.:..+J- ___
J~!?;,~;~t:;\, ' , ' , ", '. . ',~, " ~ \i =:
,;pi:';:',~'.J'~I:" '1"'-1' '6\.1. I i'Ht.: n Tl T :'/i;;; i\"'1.-- f-
,'-"';f?<,. \" :'~ '/ ,:---,. ~" ,..,~,' <0 .. ... _ " : . . '..,.;:.,.._
l'..;~~ ,;,:t:.J':';~~~ :'~:,"'1..1,~.~~'~~... "~1:~t'?i:~;~' .:~.~\. ~,- 'T'" ......:...~.
;~tiL~~1"~,~: i "~;'::;:~~;i;:::::,,~\ ~:x,1:,n '.'r-. . L....:...: -f ~ ~~
.7.il;,::.'i:i".:;;;.,,~.I~:,:~"..,::,.. , " '. ,ii":, f ~ .'
",,"f.', ,..,., ; ........"., ,'. '" ,'... , . I I 5:EE!
"~y~~!{':::;(-~~;~ f!;i~:i:::;;(:t(f;: /:1;;0\'<:':, . h'- ,',..-rr--_'" ...,
~l1\~,.;.\~,...., HI:l,~""",~';1..':""", '1.\ll,\r. V-!.._ !!...lI..-
---...,-, <'t;~i('.";:,,~., T/'i:.:l::,~:.;:i:i~:::;';7. <:. ?1~~'hJt~ILL ~I _J_II.__
. ,;;E;r.:.~:::::;;V;:!:<~.~~; <t;. nrn...\',\: I. _' , /:,
.'...,..1..../"....,,:1.1.:<.0, t..' ,}.:,." .'" \' . ,'," . I ~
'~.:.::..~.~.~:~...../':~::::>:;~.ij:~~;~~~::: )fg!>~~;:::~ ~T:, . 2:~ --J _,_
:!: ." ~;";; ....:':.,~ji~';..~.;::,....- '.~i11.t"1"..~~.l I J ; r- If
., '. /'.' !,"...~.'I'\"........ '~"n" 1/ .1---' - J ,.
~'. L...:::~,;~/:~_;~.~.~~ '\..,,~.'/.; . .; ____ '1
"I" .:.. .,..'~l'''.''.......'I>':J'.' '/.'" '. I ~ - 1 11
) :~: :;>;~;,; ~~~:'I ':it~~.", .,'(\ c::- c.C ,_ __ j
/~;~;f:;:':~.:;.~~';(;;~;l~i;.~.~~~.l ~'t~~~; . :........:.~~.;. '. _'~-.!._
..".,.::,.,.,!,t"~h:':ll'; '~:"l~'i,\' . .",-",' ,-j' I
::~!"I..~'.f;~.~'.':t!:j.~...I~'~J:~~:.. i':'~,' (/1': "
- -,.,', '..f.'''''\''.'".l! ,I .."..1 .. . W
~'''"''''''''\'.'''''' -- -
-Vgr,:l"'''::::'''<:('<'{''~;I:I~' ',~'~ ~>.. " 2I
.t;;i~~1~1."~:~;:"f~;,:i~1:ir~'~ l~': ... I I I "
.... ,".~.I , "l" t. I "': '~..,
~~.~!~l.)~",.:!~ ~.~:.t'!::f.~" ;~J~:i ".\'~ .<:. . _ _
....~1":;~.1.1o. .......'r.H...~~ ~. ,,' -0:: _
I 11 "~'i'):ti...~ .:s;. i".'.",.,~:.. ........., ,., . "J.
"..;....,~.,1.....~ ::4\:~"'1~~"'''._' ~I'_
.....'h,...'\.~..l \.. i"'''I'~ :.~ .~.
I "r' :~:;'~;1:'~::.:'~'}:''''I'' ',' /
lI':U('(I"\'I'~'l' ,. .-tl:
I' .~t~~~ '::f::'. .1 t,'
f ....... i ('. .~:,'
:iXT
. -......-.....-----..... "-'--- ---
:.=..~
5
i
I
.
i
!
r- ,..,- ..-.-,~~~i\...
ill
,L_. '- __
f
,
.
,
-;-
r
~-
I
- o.
r
-.
/,
.t
f C/1(
[__1' h1 :. "
,
.
.. '.
, ....--.-.. r ,
I
,--
~":"
..
i[
""\
'.J--'~'\'--o" '.
. .. j
-, " ./
......
,,' -d...
/ l' .-)
'..... .~.4._'
-"'-'--
........
i
. ,Ii' ". .,,-,-
" ! - _ .1... '_...-,
.....L ~.. _. ,;. ..._ .4"
. 'Il,_
i I . ..!.. .,.1' l!
., ,~'
",.1 ~ .. ~'. (
", , /' I ~
--.;....-,. . l I
.. ..... .....
. ..
,.....1
'- I
.........
..',..,,)
..
.1...--..- .._,~:~.~_.
( ,
" ~ \,',
..
I \t:h. .'11 1.__...:(.,.
\~ f
\.:,...... . ,.
~..~- '" "
'.
I
!
I
P.oa4
---.-..
I
Ot;
ZL
<c.
W<
0t
<X:u
Zu
<2
g~
Q
:z
lLJ
C!J
~
tIl
V)~
~a:
c.c:<
<:<: ;,:.
zE ~~Z
Qz~z".:
tzUJUJ1iI-~
UJtu~l-ffi~
t;:C""ffi;:'
iSoU:",w:
ZUJ:>(/)'
~<aJ~"'<
<i3m:;li::
J:I-oa:g
g13~ECIl
00 (1)0
(:lUJ~oUJ,
Z(/)<tZCIl
Fl(~f=~
!!20<!!Io
@g;2i@5:
I " I j
:r:
<(
o
a
2
~~. <(
,q In:. ....,Aj :2
'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
-92
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 92-8 FOR TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF ANDOVER BLVD./PINEWOOD ESTATES
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 073-92, dated
19 92 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
Hank Weidema Excavating
Bonine Excavating
Barbarossa ana Sons
for bids as set out in
May 19 ,
tabulated according to law
$138,107.73
170,011.20
191,458.50
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
HaAk Weidema ExC'auat:in'] as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Hank Weidema Excavatinq the
amount of $138,107.73 for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this 19th day of
City Council at a
, 19 , with Councilmen
"voting in favor of
voting
the resolution, and Councilmen
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria volk - City Clerk
JUN 15 '92 15:46 T,K,D,A, & ASSOC.
P,6
TKDA
1une 15, 1992
TOLTZ.KlNO. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND A.eOClrATIiI.INClORPOAAnD
1 SOO MEAlTOR TOWill
444 oeDAA ITAl!er
IAlNT PAUL. M1NNlilIotA"101..,0lI
PHONIi:tlt.az..woo ~AX:I'IIZU~"
ENGINEiRS ARCHITECts PLANNERS
Honorable Mayor and City Councll
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Trunk Sanitary Sewer to Pinewood Estates
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 10151
Dear Mayor and Council:
Bids for the above referenced project were received on June 15, 1992 with the following results:
Contractnr
Amnunt of Bid
Hank Weidema Excavating
Bonine Excavating
Barbarossa and Sons
$138,107.73
170,011.20
191,458.50
$129,791.00
Engineer's Estimate
It is recommended that a contract be awarded to the low bidder, Hank Weidema Excavating, in
the amount of their low bid of $138,107.73.
A complete Tabulation of Bids is attached for your infonnation.
Sincerely yours,
JLO:j
Enclosure
JUN 15 '92 15:47 T,K,D,A, & ASSOC,
~I'
j ~ t1
r J; j
d;:
~. g! ~
· a
3 &1
~ i
II
I
<<
i
~ I
I i
~
o
..
R =:
~
B :;t
! ~ ~
i~~ I
il: i
a~:! ~
151 !
g
,
I
gggggg8ggg8888gggggggggg8~1~
' . . , I . . . . . . . t . . . . . . I I . . . , If.
~gg~~~~~~~~~gggg~~g~~ggg~:I~
~~~O~~~~O~.M~~O~"~Q~ ~Q~~~I~
~~.~N ~~~~~~~.~~~ ~ ~.N~ f~
C\f f"t N I ..
lpoj
I
ggggggggg8gggggggggggggg~~
~OO~~.~a~N".~~O=oo~o~o~~~o
N~..~~~.....~.oo~.o~~~~o
~ .~ ~c "~
poj., poj
g~gggggggg8gggggggggg~ggg~l~
. . . I . . I . . I I . . I . ~ . f . . . I I . . . I .
"8og"oo~oo.ooO~Q~~g~oooQa~,~
O",!O~~O~~NO"'O~~~"~~~~""O""'N
~ V'~.~~~~~~~N~.G~~~~ NO~~~I~
It " .... Ill" """ III .. III ... "" .. .. """" ... II "iii. I .
NN"poj~ ~N~poj~~N"~"N., N~~N .
N I"IN f::t
I
,
8ggg8gg8gg8ggg8gggggggggg~
coocP~:~~~N~.~~~Qgcoooo~po
~~~~M ~~ ~~~~~~p~~~n~"~
~., 1"1
gg~~~8g~gg~~~~gg~~g88gggg~r~
' I . . . . . . t . . . . . . fl. , . . . . , f . J .
80~N~.aM~~~M~NOOpoj~OM~"OOO~,~
OO~N~ .~""C"NO"."OPOOO~O~'~
~~~M.. ~".M~~~=~n~~ MQa~~~I~
III .. III Il1o" Il1o Il1o III ...-... III "'. III . .. I III
NN~~" ~~M .~~~~"N ~ N~ :~
I
I
I
gg~~~~g~g~~~~~8gg8gggg8gg~
aO~~~~~H~~DOOOQo~~leO~~=ONO
~~NN~~.~~~~~~~OC~ OMMO"~
::l~ ~ N
gg~gggggggggggggggggg~8gg~lg
. . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . , I I . . , I I .
"000~OC.00~800"8.~0~~c"~0~'~
~~~~~~~:~:~~~~~~::l~g~~~g~~~l.,
III .. 1\ .. . III III "..." III "'.." .." .. III
NNI"I poj N~N "~~N~N~" . pojMI~
I
I
ggggggggggggg8gggggggggggg
aON~ON.~.~.o..~oo~~o~~~~~~
~~~"M~~"~..~~~og~~o~~~ ~
::t~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~
gg8ggggggggggggg=~g~gggggg
C_OQMO~~~ONCOO~~~~~~~QOMO~
~~poj~~~PNPN~""~., pojOI"l..~
poj ., NM ~ ~:::l
. ! ........jlsa,!~.~ss~~
" ~~::l~~=~~~~ II !~i~ii~
C:::lRM I r I , I , I I "'''' Ill" ,
1"I'/i:'ON.....ON. >-ll-l >-l ~ .
~~=Ol"lpojpojpojI"lNNN QQ Q~" ~
~=o=~~==~~==~~.~i~~~ is;
~~~~~~~~~~~~QQ~~!~S~ ~~e
~i!fim~l~ul~~~~~li~~!~m~;
1',K~~~~~~~~~~~~:,jj~j;;t~ij
...~...~m.~~; ,...,
.-w~"~~M""~"B . ....
M~~~~~~C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P.7
QQooogaaOOOCOOOOOIO/O
OOCOOOOQQOOOOQQOOtg ~
. I . . . . . . . . . . I . . , 'J t .
g~=::g~~~~gg~:~g~gl~ ~
~~~~~~~..~."~~~~O ~ .
.. .... II """ .. ../. .
· ~n .~N ~ ."."
. ~
~
. I
,
OOCOOoeoOOOQCGOOO
OOQCQo~a~oo~Ooe~o
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
N ::IN.,OO ~
coooooeOOOOOCOOOOIO/O
OO~QOOOOCQO~OCQOOI~ ~
. I . . , I , I . . . , . . . . . I. .
Oi~~8~o.g;~~~~::~,: ~
l!l."N~~~~M.~poj~N.,~~I. ..
"'" .... III "'".. '" "'" J" ...
N crain ~~N::: .. ,!Q ~
I I"l
I
I
gg~~gg:~ggg~~gg~g
. . I . . . . I I . . . , I . . .
"~~NNpoj~~QN\O~~~o~~
N ~"M~ ~
OOQOOOOOCCOOOOOOOIO/.,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~ ~
N:O~OO".~~.N"~O~~I~ ~
· ~.O~~N~~o...~~~,. 0
· ~N..-~on~~~~~~~f. 1"1
. II II .. 'It... II .. "'"..
..., ..~ ~U')N 0 \tt I 0 ~
I"l f"'::l
J
~~g~gg:~~~~~g~g~~
~~~N~~~~~~~~mNON~
(\II "C'IIfl1\O C
" ~
..000000000..0000....10/..
oOQOOOOOQOOOQOOOOIC Q
, . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , t I I. .
~~~~g~~ggog~;~~~~;~ ~
O~NN~~~.O~~H~N~~~I. ~
. ... 'It .. "'. III "'." '"
,., ...." ."l"'i ~ fa :; ~
I ...
I
I
~g~gggggggg8ggg~~
~~~NN~~O.~~~.MON~
N Qcr-.~,., Q
f"i : a:>>
~t~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~
COOOOOOOCQCoooooo
OOCOooaooOOQCO~O=
omooo.o~ooooao~o~
~~~~O~~ ~:~.~.~ O~
~~ N~~ ~~ ~ ~~
& i ;;,~ h
uU r ii~i
~~ ~~~! ;:U~ [:
h!~lftl'm'iil
'!!:~lilllll~~liB~
III! ~ ~5~B~li~~
~~~.~~~~.~~=~~=~~~