HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC March17, 1992
"\
,J'
-.0.
.-.1'\
7:30 P.M.
~J
"
,
~
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting
:' March 17, 1992
Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Pheasant Meadows Sketch Plan
2. Round Lake Blvd/Bunker Lake Blvd.
Reconstruction/9l-22 & 91-28
3. Accept Petition/Woodbine Street
4. Special Use Permit/City of Andover Recycling
Day
5. Crosstown Payment/Anoka County
Staff, Committee, Commissions
6. Approve Revised Precinct Boundaries
7. Assessment Abatement/Delinquent Utilities
8. Authorize Repair of Grader Motor
9. Approve Election Results/Fire Chief
10. Award Bid/Refurbishing/Fire Truck
11. Approve Expenditure/Wiring & Plumbing of
Hose Washer System
Non-Discussion Items
12. Accept Feasibility Report/9l-27/Eldorado St.
13. Accept Easement/90-25
14. Approve Final Plat/Weybridge
15. Approve Final Payment/9l-4/Hills of Bunker 4th
16. Order Assessment Roll/Accept Roll/Waive Public
Hearing/Adopt Roll/Hills of Bunker Lake 4th
17. Release Plat Escrow/Woodland Creek 2nd
18. Adopt Resolution Amending Bad Check Fee
19. Schedule Joint Meeting w/Tree Commission
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
l"~'<C""'"""~"'''''''\\\.
{j ~~
: -) 1~\ J!
- "'''-
~,'~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE MrlTC'h 17 1 QQ?
ITEM
NO_
Approval of Minutes
Admin.
~~.
V. Volk'l)'
APPR~. D, FOR
AGi'11J
BY:
AGENDA SECTION 1
NQ Approva of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following m~nutes:
March 2, 1992
March 2, 1992
March 2, 1992
Regular Meeting (perry absent)
Closed Meeting (Perry absent)
HRA Meeting (perry absent)
,
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
_';~':f"'"'''''"~'''''''.''''\'
l '\
;;, ,~.1
,,, ,~
''11;"._
,~
'~~--
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 17,
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
~JM Approve Proposed Sketch
i. Plan Pheasant Meadows
#
Andover Review Committee
BY:
The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan
of Pheasant Meadows (Don Boeke property) as presented by Hokanson
Development, Inc.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
/
1. The proposed sketch plan is located in a R-4 Single Family
Urban Zoning District with a minimum lot size of 11,400 square
feet. Minimum width is 80 feet except corner lots are 90 feet
minimum and minimum depth for all lots is 130 feet.
2. All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 all)
which relates to lot size requirements. The property is
located within the MUSA area. In addition, the front 100 feet
of the lot shall be buildable which is a standard the City has
been using for sewer and water lots.
'-
3. The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
4. The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10 and
all other applicable ordinances.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
~r
~~ History
The ARC has reviewed several layouts presented by property owners
and drawings prepared by City Staff over the last three years.
The sketches that have been reviewed in more detail by the ARC
are attached drawings A, Band C. All the sketches have good
possibilities. The ARC recommends sketch plan B with the "T"
intersection or have l34th Avenue NW constructed as a east/west
street directly to Jay street NW. The City Council should keep
in mind the sketch plan shall layout so that the existing Hurst
home (property to the north) could be incorporated into a future
development plan.
Remember: This has not been studied by staff in detail as most of
the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary plat
process.
Note:
There is an existing home on the parcel.
the Building Department will be reviewing
of renovating or removing the structures.
The developer and
the possibility
~J
Planning and Zoning Commission Comments
The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended sketch plan B
with the understanding that any streets from the east side of Jay
Street NW aligns as a full intersection or meet the Ordinance on
street jogs if the streets do not align as a full intersection
(jog). See Ordinance lO, Section 9.03 (e).
~J
'~;T . .-;~
.... ~
- ,
I
,~r. .
~
/~
I . u-
~
~) \~ ~
~
...
0
....
1<1
'"
...
.CI
~
Q
, .,
'I ":l
~ <(
11
~.... Q
\ :t
,
, 7"
, I'D
a
W
l::
, ~
'"
:-'< ~
~
Q ~
~<t ~
~ ~
-..' <t.
.... u.
.
~ ~
~ "
~ -~
\-1
o "J""
-l I
C!
~ 1
'" a.
1:. IU
2: ~
:i~
<
.' -'1
'-_/
'Z
.:
*
.
.
.~
.
.
.
II
.
.
.
I
III
.
~.
, '\
, I
-~
~
""13
~
'\)
~
"t"
-,:
~
~
~
~
\. ,.J
-oJ.
:5
~4: r
8~
~u.
-Ill
~~
Iil -
V"j1
~-:r
Q I
.JCl.
~o
:Sw
;~
~~
~z
\
i
J
~I
1'\
~
>r
\J
;Z
k
~
~
~
I
...
~
...
'u
&i
'2
~
';z
<(
':I.
0
~
7"
Ql
Cl.
E
~
..
j
VI
-
..,
".
..
'" I; >r
-",
.-
.
.
Ie
.
.
.
- Ie
I
.
I
I.
I.
i
"",- '
I ...... \,
. l~\-
~ ,-..:l
S~EZJrCH ~~--- j' .Il
,. ' / I .. . . -- -. ! I .
I -', -- . .' (. .,-..', --
'~.';~:i;-.:c ,-" Z t _____---:.,;!.)d~~,,~ \~ o. ~~.~_l\II/..~,:.:~t~!.' \f-.
, ,\ ..~_.-.., .,1 ,- \ f "'r'~ 1 ...."" ..
') " ....--::;::';../ .; ) HI .' ""(lJ/M~M\Li3'.$/~& ~./ _.::. 'I
'--, ,\ '.:/.7 .'., 1I,'-It>e-F,-'2., . I
,'\.I,/i( ..l "-:, Y 1..1$<] 'T (0..:1- (J,'. . ..~._--~. \..:.-
~/I:f~' . ~I )., '. LIP'...-;- '. t1tdl~:: J~ . / 01 ~~:..I'T. ~j ."":""0:
1" /:fd ..' ~~ -,~ ,.. . - . ''." (1. ~~;"")--~_' ~~u.
. .1/: ,I f. r-.;--- ~.fftJt).),) I "/, ~ ,'W' n.. ~0 :-.j 1,-:;1-:::!. - ';: _
I ,. . I -""""'J " ..c \.,~. ~ ~ ... ~
DOH ,-. " ... I' .I~,~"',; j."'} ").1. "~/11 A :i., ..-. . ;::0 . l__:f.
-. . , . . . .. "\,.\...,,..J \ ~ ' . _ t
~~. ,}., /.r.- .. (. I (V . I'I"'~~I.\. r-<t .~i'i,...,. t.
,: /. I,.: }' '-J ~p /. ,J.. IJ:!' '( r ,"'/' /-"r..A:.---::-=- ~,' I i
~., . .'J. A;; ,. - ~". / 11/ ~ 1( ( .~f .. :j-A.:. './ 11..1. - '=--.-! l' . :::.. ~~/ _/. ..j" : :,
. '. .......(1... . \ \ ~ ..., -- . ,,' I
~~aa.~, .\. yr-. ..-,:~. -:.... ~~ .. ; /.';' ~-' '~~'-'m17;!4.~ {J ;i'i~" .' (F ';"jf1J' ~<.~ ;
,.11, ~\'" l'r.! .......,- ~<7t, , ,~ ,\ ....ELl _ -- ~ '- - I
.' .." . Irii / 1 . . i' ,I , tJt" :r.-' -..... ..
I~, 'L~ ~ 1. ' i'~: Sf. . ,. 7 ~ ~~'. _-r I V),:, :':ibii:J ~ r _::-"',. .... _. i
. l :; .:. ,/./ r .' .: . I ;,.-' r~ --.!..., --. r+tl-- --
. I ' ~ . . / . ,-....... /l---...
", i ~ - .....' '. \,' ., I .'. _._ \. \ '. "-,. --',/;" / / \. . ".'!
J. I ' , . / .. \ ~ ~ ~ ~............ "'"..I '",--._
'- ": .': "/ r-. .-_ ""' ~, ' . ',,'lll._., /"/ ' t-\i.s-r-d .
~r (-' ........-..::> -- . ---' ..' .J' - '< ',-~ ---..::::::: /'0r .-. -..... ~ I'
~ /'.......-"- .-- ". ...., ~ . "I~.. j'
\ . - - - '....... "'. .............. ,* ~-_...... . . .
: ...:./,. / /.~' --.,.. c...-.. .::::::::.:-:'.."-::.::-.........~-:::~,:"".:.-;,:.....;.,"-....,( . .'r
' J-'.' If:=::: -- , ... -.... . v PO" -:"...:.r ~ --... I
~ -Ii ' "., . "" '~\ ; ..'.1 i~"!! . f../ .': J : .. ,..
\' ..: ~. /;~ \ \ ~ \ ." )b, "- \ . ." !. J J). ~l
, \ \.. ~\ 'V ~ _ ,~- '.. '!;'
: ., .: \ \' ,: ') - \ "'1 ~- -. t /.1 "t .""--...: .....:~
1....::. I "~--__ ~-.. ~. I,
"~ I. ...1-. I . ,./ ,...:-" ...-. _.::':'- ....---:--. ...::F ..-r--.......
-, _.....I.. \ lQ;lI"4 4v~ N'N..' ,1" ./ I ,. /"--_ ..:.," : j.t/, .- 'C
.. . __.. ..- ." -~ - ~ . . _ _ '..' I 1-'" -- 0.'
., I ~~; ~~.~i:.~.~'~2'}-~:'-""~i~",c.;~~:" ";.'0 ...
z.. qoo.O .~,3 I. ':'-.. 1'%., G'1<1.0 8et.O
3 fl'l.'1.0 e~*. 0 .
. u. ~1h.o e8S./ (-}.. ..
<) .'fOO.O.~t~.~~~~.
fo_q~~~q'-.t5~E~~_. .,
7. i~:~ ,;.~~.~ ";_
.~. iOb:G' ~b.~.:-...GL... ........ '-. .
"q."r2..qL1..., g~,~ ~.. . ;;' ,
','
F::3 2.3 ';8 :.5:01'
T K D .; :( ~==vc., ~""ii:.
Vl,t"""""- -
-
- .
~.
1
~ ((;(100
1
'IUrE
= - - ~:-
---__ c... __.
~ =- . t ~iiftJf-D
-- x --
~::-- -. ---
. -- r_. __ ___
.-.-
1!t\ ___
-...-.- W ---
.~:::'--. -2.~-Q. W,~lt W~
(....J.u~
t _._, ,
I,,_'~D _'-"&..0
,_._ II __._
...... -....-- ....
-- .. .,...- -- ,.-
-- ..- ....., .... -.-.
....... -- ,-- ..........
1'-.;,----- ._.... .
--- -- ........
____ _......... ~ ....-=.r...a:
~ ..
--
" r
(g)
'-_/
6" "..... .
~
o .
~ -
.. " e
... 0 i _I 0.
Q = I lILw t..
:z:. > 1 'I.l
'<~. 1= ~
~: j ,
O~! 0 ~
~O: IJl ~
f-~~\.i
5 ~
If! ,~ ~ ~
l1.l ~ 1:. \l...
~ Ii
,; ~ ~ ~
2 Do t:z
P
Co ~ ~
1 ~ ~
t>.-
oe "2 S.
~2n.
_, ___.'. _ _ ~~"--1'iOS~'
1" . .. . 10'
'-J : :
). .
~
<t
~
-"\
.~~J
,
)
.J
~
!
""
w 2
tI' 0
u -
<(~
o
:2 ...--'
e~f~
~I~
\..:\'-'; ~
.U
."" ':! "6
j:: ~ q
<( 2
- -
P 1/1. <( ..~
!
I
- .1.5
,
I
\
, I
'...- --.....
,
.
v
'"
a
~
~
~
I
i
..
. -.-'
i
--
;
~ V) .\
~ \.U-
~
~i OC
I~IO
~.l~ -<t.
I 1 '
~
\
j
,
.1
_.. f
'. I.rf~_......
:.~ (
-.'.
:~:
.'
.',
::..
:.~. t
.'<':';';:-'
~ .
2 ~
, .
. '
Iil l'
'7 :
,,~
/ I
--~- /
,"7.....
..t...
.- -.......
.... . ~_.,...
. '
:.: I . __l \
. I r :
I .-
i .'
j.
.0
...
~
'~
t
~
~
;~
C'
.
..;
$;
-.
'.~
~;
.,
.""
~-
.~:
!
.
:i
0;
c:.
".
.,
~ ~
- ;. ~
.
;
..
..
~
I~ ."j
~m
. .
..
Q~
~.~ .
!~
~..
..~
~
@
::i
~~
Q"
....
...
~~
...
:Co
~
/;?~,,'e
!fl '~
:1 j;i
;~ :, J
, ~
',~
'>.
-;~':'J"'!"',"!f!'i;i"
-i"'~~~"''''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
Discussion Item Planning
e v. un er Todd J. Haas
~TJM Lake Blvd. Reconstructio I David L. Carlberg~
~19l-22 & 91-28 BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to discuss possibilities f
providing vehicle access to Grace Lutheran Church located on
southeast corner of the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard
(CSAH 9) and Bunker Lake Boulevard (CSAH 16).
flit
APPRO}E::t....OR
AGE ~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
the
Staff has reviewed 4 options to consider for providing access to
the site.
Note: The County in all options mentioned below will be
acquiring the right-of-way and reconstructing the service
road and deeding this back to the City.
Option 1
The County will reconstruct the service road and then acquired
{ right-of-way and construct a 32' city street from the service
~ road to l36th Lane NW. The County of Anoka will require the City
to be responsible for the right-of-way acquisition and
construction cost for that portion between the service road and
l36th Lane NW. The City has received a petition from the
residents of Chapmans Addition concerning the construction of the
street. If the City is interested in the connection, is the City
willing to pay for the construction and right-of-way or is the
City willing to assess to the benefitting property owners. The
Church and owners of the Medical Building have indicated to City
staff that they would not be willing to participate in these
costs.
Option 2
The County will reconstruct the service road and acquire the
right-of-way from the service road to l36th Lane NW but only
construct the street just short of l36th Lane NW and allow the
Church to construct a driveway from the street to the proposed
parking lot. Again, the Church and the owners of the Medical
Building have indicated that they are not interested in
participating in the costs in either construction of the City
street or the driveway link to the proposed parking lot.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,-
TO
SECOND BY
(~ Option 3
The County will reconstruct the service road. Once this has been
constructed, a private driveway could be constructed jointly by
the Medical Building and the Church 24'-28' wide. The driveway
could be constructed along the east side of the existing parking
lot of the Medical Building and then construct the driveway west
to the proposed Church parking lot with green space between the
existing Medical Building and l36th Lane NW to allow storage for
snow. Ordinance 8, Section 8.08 (J) allows for Joint Facilities.
Again, the Church and owners of the Medical Building are not
interested in participating in the construction costs.
o
~~
Option 4
The County will reconstruct the service road and provide or
reconstruct the Medical Building driveway access to the existing
parking lot. This option would not provide access for the
Church.
Additional Comments:
The Medical Building is concerned with the liability and
snowplowing of the facility if this becomes a private driveway.
In addition, the Medical Building is not interested in having a
joint parking facility by connecting the proposed Church parking
lot with the existing parking of the Medical Building. The
reason for this is the Medical Building owners want to protect
the pedestrian traffic movement at a maximum and keep the flow of
traffic within the existing parking lot at a minimum.
"J
PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Round Lake Boulevard NW &
Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Reconstruction
Projects 91-22 and 91-28
March 17, 1992, City Council Meeting
The Andover City Council is asked to consider two options in the
construction of a street/driveway from Bunker Lake Boulevard NW to
provide access for Grace Lutheran Church.
Options #1 & #2, City Street (See Exhibit A)
If a City Street were to be constructed from Bunker Lake Boulevard
NW to l36th Lane NW the following actions would be needed:
1. The property would need to be platted from one parcel to (2)
two via Ordinance No. 10.
2. Variances would be needed on the lot width at the front
setback line. Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 requires a width
of 150 feet at the front setback line in NB, Neighborhood
Business Districts. Therefore, Lot 1 would require a 46 foot
variance and lot 2 would require a 14 foot variance.
1
'--/
3. Variances would also be needed on the lot area requirement for
both lots. Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 requires NB
Districts to be a minimum of 2 acres in size. However, Staff
interprets the 2 acre lot area requirement to really mean a 2
acre district requirement. Lots within this 2 acre district
requirement should then be able to be subdivided into smaller
parcels with a minimum lot size, for example, of 25,000 square
feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission will be examining
this issue and may propose an amendment to the lot area
requirements in NB and SC, Shopping Center Districts as
specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02. At this time
however, variances would still be needed.
Lot 1 Total Area Estimated 28,080 sq. ft.
Lot 2 Total Area Estimated *30,940 sq. ft.
* Excludes County right-of-way acquisition.
Concerns
1. Who will be responsible for subdividing (platting) the
property if the city acquires a 60 foot right-of-way between
Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and l36th Lane NW? The City's
acquisition of the right-of-way would physically subdivide the
parcels. Legal council should be consulted at the meeting on
this matter.
: )
~\
.--./
Page Two
Round Lake Blvd./Bunker Lake Blvd.
Reconstruction/9l-22 & 91-28
Option #3, Private Driveway (See Exhibit B)
If a private driveway were to be constructed beyond the County
right-of-way from Bunker Lake Boulevard to the south and then west
to Grace Lutheran Church, the property owner may wish to subdivide
the parcel by platting down the center of the driveway. If this
were to be the case, an 18 foot variance would be needed on Lot 1
for the lot width at the front setback requirement of 150 feet.
The driveway would also encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot
separation (green space) for parking and driving surfaces from the
existing right-of-way of l36th Lane NW.
In both cases or options, Lot 2 will be a large enough to be a
buildable lot.
\
\.J
,
,
'j
Construction Cost For Round Lake Boulevard
and Bunker Lake Boulevard
.~
'--')
The City Staff has discussed a rough cost participation that the
City will be responsible for with the County Highway Department
Staff and they are as follows:
* Sidewalks - $35,000
The cost is for sidewalks along the following locations:
1. Round Lake Boulevard east side from l33rd Avenue NW to
Bunker Lake Boulevard and 2. Bunker Lake Boulevard south side
from Round Lake Boulevard to the service road near the Medical
Building.
* Signals - $128,000
Three (3) signals are proposed which does not include the
signal at l36th Lane NW and Round Lake Boulevard.
* Storm Drainage - $50,000
* Concrete Curb and Gutter - $20,000
The City is responsible for half the cost of the curbing.
* utility Work - $30,000
Sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer may require some
relocation or adjustments.
* Street Construction - $12,000
This is the street to provide access to the Church if
~ , the City uses Option 1.
\ )
Total Construction
Plus 8% Engineering
$275,000
$22,000
$297,000
Total
The County is willing to bill the City in 1993.
\
,
,
. ')
"-- //
/' '\
'-J
\\
......
"
)
!V
- Ul
11-::;
-'"
8-0
..--
I>
cZ
,
~!ii
~~l~
~;I..~
~l=f
~,dl
vi:..
"I"
> ",
.
ROUNDLAKEBLVO .-..-.
c...<
Ol
-l
~
.--
>
Z
rTl
;z:
;::
.,
;~
~-
t!
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:CD
I~
.^
.rr1
I'"
.r-
.>
Ii:;
.CD
1'--
:~
I
I
., I.
;~
R_
ji .
I I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
-.u-'<; J,,,,.' .,.. ""oIl"'l",...
~
to
..-
..-
I
.
<(
.
(f)
U
'--./
o
>
--.J
m
W
~
<(
--.J
0:::::
W
~
Z
=:)
m
'---.------'---T-.
"':.;';'- Ol'~"
:') ! '-.
'l.
.,.
~\
I..
! .., i
i ! ~ \~ : ".
(:1 1\
Ii
Ii
, I
.11 l
""""'j
. ~
.'..IT.'
!
!
t
, ,
, I
II
I;
\,.:' ~ .~
('.
Ii.
. ,
,
I
i
I r .,
1(1 ..,,1
, ". : . . ~
l! n: .> ! j
I " ;;~ :::~ I i
Ii (.)!:
i .> ~'. (l t '>ll ; ~
I :1' ".1" : ~i I I
j' Ii. !
J : : ; : I
j I', I _~ 1
t I! 'r I,' ,j
'.:.~14il::t: 1 \..
12\! ...# II
14;1 ~ i .
f~:l" .',"1' ~i:
.' 'r ,..;
." . .....,.. , II .~"..;t'+"~. _ ' , '.. i
. . .........,.... .1.......... "I ..
.: I'..' 1 · ,1(;
'oIl.'_N.r'''. .:. ':j ...'
-lilt ~ ll:'
~ll "(.! "
.1'
1, i
i i
j i
,1 j
iI
!i i I.
., '
Ii I
: I .J
Ill:) :t:
Ii :111
II ..'
II, i I
1'1
1,/'
!
Ii
:!
I;
I:
Ii
:),
II !
! J....~.,.._-- i I i
{ lLJ
'\ II I
\, II ,1
'. ._ ; I ;,. t
, il, i
I r'l' j (~:.l: ';,'
.' ...,
. .. -J~ ) "
/' ! I' I
.(' II. !LC!\ "\l
I.... ;'f' \ I I
1', J. I
.,,,=,,", I ..., i! I
, .'
. (! 1:'/;111 I
f1 ',' I d i
~ ,'. I: I;
I, I I; . I i I ~
'I'; '.';....';:: I I!
;' ! 'IV.'
t j) i! I
~ i ::: i:~'
I
~~-_._-
I
"
i i
: i
, ,
; I
! \
11
I '
. I
, ,
; I
I !
I '
tll
t.:!
/t I
'!'I
(]
I, I
, I,
I) Ii
, I'
j :
, '
, i I II
. I I.
~ I , t
I I ..
i ,t ,I \ I
! :;,...:
) : 11
I' .,J.
: 'I ',,;
I ~ 1 H
j ;;
n ~~' t
:' II I
: ~'i I
\ I I
I
I
I
,/ II
I
I
I
II
"..
z
o
I-
U
:::>
0::
I-
(.f)
Z
o
U
I.. :
.. ,.,-.. 1-..
~....... ......:....~.:_._:>. ....,,;. .1..~ Z .
; I ~i
r" -,~;,,_,.,-...'.i
!
"1' ;
.-;.t....'
z
<(
2
0::
W
0...
i
, ..., .~. '!
, ,
! :
;
., tit
! ':"
i>-
\<1:
P=l
Z
0::
:::>
I-
.1' "
,
":1
~ QjIQj.~
.-t .-t ....... .-t
. ;
Ii
,
o
m
(\J
i' i.;S "
>-
I" <I:
'>-fXl
!<l:z
fXlo::
,z-.
'10::-'
:::>1-
, I- '
, 0
I' m
'dc\]
,m
:(\Jw
I . 0::
;(L:::>
iLl-
w::)
lit b
I
: I
. ,
, .
/,
"-
, I
I
I ..
:
1 ;-
i ,
.
, I
"-'
, I
(j
I
. .
: 1 ~ .
: ,
j,i
i'
i"\
, .
\ l
'I
! ~
, ,
i
,
,-
I
--,
'I
,
I
I
I
-~
~
<:)
.g: -
'Q
I!
j!
l'
;
j
I
I
I
j:
\;
I'
\
i.
;:
Ii
(~~
\!
i
I:
Ii
,;
I;
jl
il
I'
. II
I
I
I:
I
1
"
;'
,
I,
I:
,.
I
Ii
l!
II
I;
i
I
~
\
u
j:
Ii
"
I!
II
.,1
I:
j'
I:
I.
I
., ,.
-....'----,.-,[.
()\ ! .:.
. ; III
I ..... ". 'jl "
i ; ~ .
i i
, : 'I
Ii'" :
. .... r ~', I i.
. I "..
d.- 1
. I J I - : ~
I', !: ,
Ill'; ,'j:,' ::! ;. /' 1
'.. fOp;
l'~ . .
',I, 'j' n.
I..
I I l ,....., (:'.'1
! I ,1" ,)
I i, ..f ~ ~ (1 ,
I" ".r' ,~;
\ :}. I '
II j: I.
I!,t ! '
.. I: 't ;
..~..~14t.t~~1 j"
I. ,
12; i .Jt! I
I
14(: ~I i
~..... . , r, 1 ~ t.
/ i.,' . i ,')
j. . :... !' .
:...,...... . . '. i
tf- '.0:..' '1___ . .,,to'!. !"'.~ :':. \. I .~.
~ !.,,}. t, i I \,.:
t'-'.ll! '\: , vi,
-,. r' 'IV1 i' ;-! l~ I
',', ..... " ,I.... ...
I 1'!~!
I ! · '1 I
.,
~ ;
-,"'"~,, ..,..,"....,..
",
,
"
\
j
I
;;----....
CD
,--
,--
I
<(
.
(f)
U
'-...../
o
>
-'
m
w
~
<(
-'
0:::
W
~
Z
~
CD
",- '!to
~ !
: j
II
~' i
ill i ,
id !
f I I
II', 1..
1" 'I'
.['j !
I ~
1 i :Itl
I!
III i
1-1
tl.. i...! '1..
'I I
Ii.! '
. 1'1. I
, J...___J.
, t;
; Ii!
"\ ~
\'''-.,Ii
! Ii
ii
! I:
, ,.
'I !I
I H
! q
LJ
i I II
, L
n
I ,I'
I Jl'l'
j:;(r
1 ;fJ i11i
I 'f) "
(~ 'ti... f
" I ;
!.~ ,I !
! I
I
,
I
r
'll I I ;!..
': I
~ I' -'. ".':: l'
. , :.)
.\,.\. I'.')
/~i! .1' I
( Ii I"I;;;~\ ''1'
: ;"',[L::[ ~~11 I
Ii; ;'1; ! IJ
!i, ,.t. ,. 101
ll' ! J ('
. j 'I'. ! I'r
Ii"! i
1:1 ! I' :111
r :1. Iii"
r. I! I
i .,: i i
,:; ., L j d
I: . t n! I I l{)
Ili ;',! ! 1<,
f ',' Ilw
~ . .,)
C'*
-} U
i I
I
. !
'1
~ .'r~
I:l <>.l
'~t '~ ,;-,
'V \) ~ 'l.(;
~ ,!,\ ':':;,.
I;: ~ r.'
'~ R .>0:.. c..
.,.. ~ V 6
~ " ~ '\-
-..;;: ~':.. .-
~
~ "
t ,..
u. \S)
('1('\
tI\
.-Y<
' ,
i- . I
, ,
; ,'1.
:1
I....)
f-
o
::::>
0:::
:; ~
;>.,.. ~,_",,,,::,,.'".:''''''' Z
ii! 8
di; !\" .'j..".'~.':i;
t, .,.. z ...
'.,;.-,~;.i...t.~..;~ .,............;;.: ._,...,~ ,~,_..l~._.t"",- -_.'v.......
I
'1
,
.'
'.
. .,. .
. 'j"".
z
<(
2
0:::
W
(L
~ ~
U
<J. , t :>-
~ X -t-
""2 ~ 5
qJ~<3
... ...~':
".j
, .
!
!i
j'tlt
I
i
I
"
: ~
i .~
I'
rI
~ t
;\
I'
, '
; ~j
(jH d
, 'I
~; "I
.i' ":
,";":r
"" ~
~ ~
Ci ~
'" -
~~
: !
i
,
i_
v- C\JI ru ,~
......... ......... ........ .........
.'
/1
:1 !
>-
<1:
CQ
Z
0:::
::::>
f-
t. 6 '" (l
I >-
.1"<1:
I>-CQ
,<1:z
,CQo:::
:IZ :::J
:o:::f-
:::J
f- -
o
!, - 00
.OC\J
100
1. (\J W !:.
i --:
,'cL ~ I.
!:E:f- I
'W:::J
lit b
....
~
UJ
or \..
'-
~ ~
C -...I
'-l.l ~ "
11', 0 Itl ~
~ ~ ll.. u .iZ
<l: tt
2 \J <.:l ,~ CL
() ,.ry
Q.. ..J
.
i ,
{(;
,.
o
00
C\J
'.
I
i
, I
I
-.."t
1 1,-
I
'j
J
~l
f
, .
.,
i'
. "r
., ."
\(
, I
! I
..
,
. I
..
-.-
, ,
p-
\
\
~.~<-- ~
~<.i'~"'~.v :.~
:..;-"" "'-,
~--
\l
~~
hill
'!! '" t-
\j (t :j
~
Iu 1\
'"'
't =-
~
--
I
l
I
f.
I
-~
1~
~~
G\\J
~ ~ "'
III:'~
"" ~
v,,,
. "
.
v.
11--1 f] ~
j i1 ('
'-q:
---+S ...
I
l
..~
~
()
I!
Ii
Ii
r
i
t
I
i
,
I
..
,.
q
,.
jl
"
i;
~ .
J'
I.
I
i'
r s:
"'. ~c,
; IH1
I, ~
I' ~
I: ~
Ii
!'
I, ~
II ~
I, "
;
I:
Ii
Ii
'I
I
\1
. I
,
I:
,:
j
ii
I'
Ii
i'
I,
i
i
I
i;
Ii
Ii
Ii
.J
I,
I
_'l:J:....: ..,.,......".,...
...
"
"
.'
<:t
......
.-
.A
.-
~
"
uJ
~
! to
..--
..--
:r
<(
.
en
u
'-../
o
>
-.I
m
w
~
<(
-.I
0:::
W
~
Z
=:J
m
. .-.:-. : ;
._'-'-.~~--'---T-.l
~< olk' ",,,
I;.
!
!
, ,I.'.,
Ii ,I;
."",.,."""." ,.'TI"
I! ,
,..
,.~' I I
I".!.
, , II
1
(11
L
!
Ii
I
i
"".j
~
~ ~
I I (., !
i i i
; ; :,
I: l.T'
i1;>Cij
,.., ,,) I
tl t.) I !
..!'. (II ',.. : '
:1' 'or ,~i I, I
'., i Ii: 1
I 'I 11.1 i '
I 11',.l i . - . ,
l I i 't !,' . .
....--.14tl-~ I I.
121ij!1
14;! ~I:
,- .(,,,.,,,~~: L:.,~l:,.i~ i '.: "~,
I. ' d ~ .(.! I~. I
.'_'Z"]! I .I~ ; t<;
" I,j "
~lli ..
'10 '
Ii i
II
! I
! 1
ill !
Ii I !
I! ,I
r \"
,! '
I ) I,ii
I i '.1:
II i I
1.j -.
11
!i
11
Ii
Ii I
,I
i I ~ ! I'
r-- --lU
\ , , '
, . I
\, II ;1
.'. l.t
(]
; I i
,I I.
I) Ii
, Ii
i,11
I Ii
I ,1
:!.I'f:
'. . j'
f .
I, I!
i .\)',' .
'j 'ii'
, : 1 i!
j i'
n ~' r
., 'I I
I'. I I'
., j
I I
II
\
d_ I
'. ;.1' j '\:.11 ,;;
I! .,:) )'.:'
'1...\) I
..... II , I'
,r I .,
(" ',I Lr" 1'1
! "l I' .!.,\ I I
jI'~, u,\
"'"="",' f I I! I
'I"",..".il",,:, ,,,.!~j i
!j L, I !\i I I
I! I. i'~ j
lit \Ir~ II ;1;1 I
Ii I I: .
p. I! 1I,.,tl,!
t ! IiI,
~ - r~) I ' . I :
:\[::' i,' ; , I ii
;" ""1 i ' t'"
11:,1, I '1! ',I '.
,i 'I i i! /.
;j 1 I.'
, . . f) I
Ii.
j.; i'r-n
() 'I i : ,i
-" I
.!
I, :!
i : ~ '. "
;r
1<[
.P=l
Z
~
=>
.1-
,
C>
m
jru
;~
~::I,
:i ,
,j i.t' .,'
.j
>:' .
;.l r"~""':...'
." ..~ i I
'i' "I! ,
>:;: I'
'. .. i'?V'
, 1
..
,l.'
-,,""
<;f" euleu.~
......-t ......-t ......-4 .....-t
, I
. ,
I!
i ',~i "
, r
I,..., <[
.r
i <[P=l i
~z
~
: I Z =>
:n:::1-
=>
, I- '
C>
do m
mC\J
r.' C\J w !.
i.
I . ~ i.
'D...=> i
: L I- !
w=>
lit ~
.
.
: I
,
, I
, I
.-
"
..'
: I
: )
:
. I
i
! I
i
:-
. I
"-'
, I
p
:::.1 \...
,
': 'i
J'
! :
: ~
i - ~
\.\
, .
: i
) i
II
i . ~
1\
'V.___
~
\:i
~
VI
j
i II
I!
I j:
Ii
i
I j
, I "
~^
\)0- I~
"" Ii
....
,,~ 1.0'
'e
----------
Iq~/,
it d
(,o..
I/\J-
.?-~
o:~
o
~
~
+
o
.....j
/
115'
,
~_. - - "I
4-
~
~
-To
'-1; J
.;,0"
o.:t
>;)
o
~]
N Q
~
I
I
I
I
-~
1;7() ,
,/'\
jJ
~
-{
'"
-b ~4
~~. 2 t
;\ \~ :
~~~~
3~ 3ci:
~~ ~j
,
1/'1
.".
.u
~
',.
>-
6
:::::.
-\-
Q
~
N
t
-.J
o
-0
M
I:
\:
j,
I.
~i';
q-
\)
r
Ii
.1
I,
"
I'
II
I
. I
I:
Ii
l:
!
II
II
.f
I
;
I
~
i
i
. !
u
II
t:
I'
-_...:-
~
...... .
.-
A
:l
Ui
~
1O
.--
.--
I
<(
.
(f)
U
'-.../
.
o
>
-1
m
w
~
.<(
-1
ex:
w
~
Z
=:J
'm
, " ~
J. ..
"; "
" ....
:" ;:,
..,
;....., ..
:." :'~i' \'
~. . : :~, ~.
"I.""i
...", I I
--'--~-I._.t
.. ..{) I
;:! ".1".\ ,I,
,. .
-', i
i"l '"
I
I. l
I
ll.
i I
II '., Ii
I I;
i . I'
'''.'11,;\1,.,.",,,
'I ..
II
I ;
, ( ~
i . ' .
f-.. f I '
'.!
.... !
..' I
I. i
! :
,I
, \
i
1 !
j i
I !
, I
! :
i
Ii .1
,
1.,-:\
.' I I ,. : I
, i -.. IV.
i I n..~ ."> j \
. . ;;; ~.... II
I,' i' ,,) .
I I ( (.) I !
, :.(.,.;~ .v; \ l
l I ~ \' ,;;': I
I I . : : L.
. . ,
..'~ It. /l.
.... __._ .....-.r.(_!' /'
14~i.~ (...!
~..# .i
141i V .\
//.\ .' ..1 \ i
.' c ' it...
'[.. r\~r;, \ ..1, ;;:
"-~'~'l..'\\ I .} ) . ~t .~ 1\
'. .I 1 ,~ I
, . i il L
o I
;1~li~
'I
i \ i
,I
I !
. II ,I
I 'I
! I
, ! I II
: I Jl
[ JI!['
:i. :;,. i.1)
I! Ii
I ' ..1
, 'I I,.
, I If) ii'
.(,i ~.. f
i;: II
i
! \, I
I \ i
I .1' i
I \ '
! J
}fo"J .,t
I]
. I
'! I .1.
I'
!., ',..
,['i, 'I'
; l':1
.1
i
,.'
1'7'1
I I, '
II !
I Ii
IVI
, I
I c.
I
I,
f) 1,\'
. )
I' I !
I ; I I
i
:....
1..1
()
U
1-
U
i! ,j ::J
'1 :\ : ~
,.1 Ii r..'....,...,,' ~
:, :i/' ,;1 \ l .:,<...,!' . 8
.. _' I ' I I .' .,.
'! ." .,.,.L..,.,,-. ,.'...!..' ,..
,( _.__.~. . ..' ,. l-
. : 40',:,. ~..........t.~,.\_....z
.
~.
j I
'. : i
! ! I 11 ~
. , .
!:i l.....
Z
~- -:e
" 2:
,,~
~
w\
: !
,:~/' .:
I
,
I
I ... ~
! ~ ~
i , -
, '" '"
\ '" ::!
~ '"
~ "'
i
RoLI.-..:...:................
"
"
'\
i
Ii"
:1
J
;.J.').'
-
to, ,
.-1 -q- iU1eu ,,;
i .-< .-< eo;' .;!:
!""ii- .'
I ..J
I
1>-
.<1:
jCQ
iZ
ill::
!::J
il-
,.
iD
!m
. I C\.J
I.
I..
,\;'1
;
I '.~
/1
,II
i !
I., ':)
, .r-..
>-
,1"<1:
I ~ ~
Z
!P=l~
i I ~ ::J
,::JI-
, I- -
! ' C)
[I a 00
100C\.J
: .. C\J I
I w:
I r" i ::.
, Q. l.L. I.
I _::J I.'
iLl- I
I W::J .
It ~ I;
\
.
(. I,..
, , i
! I
I ; L j
! . I.
I \ ((i
., i
: I
i
,
i \
(Ii
I
!
i
i I
I .
.. ii
.1:
~ .
II\~
iI
1:1
i,~
t. .
\ .
,,'
I"'
"
r
,.i,'" i
!' "
I ."
. ."
I
I
I
! I
i
.1
:
! I
i
;-
'.
i
i
I
!
i
i
i
, I
I
: I
,/
()
I
."...j
!
.... I
" .."'
, :
~ '
i\
i1
r\
il
~ :~
!\
i
\
i
!
I
i
.J
c
l..a ~
11\ ~
~ I-
() ~
<><: 0
<L J
~
\..l.. t
J{>
\I I
~ ..1) f)
\: ..: ~ ,
rJ)
!! It l.. + N ~
't
)( 'j '1 '0 ~
hi ... -J -t
("'l I
~
\ . \-~I W Uj'
I 1;(:
N' '
"(
N
+
o
--J
\
,
L
-
~
,-"
r I.
.:l:' '.)
,J -.1
'.~
III ~
U. ~ ii
<:l ,~ 'I
,.I} (~~
IU D.
. ~ ~
... =-
~
-s
II
t\
I
f
,.
--
--
I
-
I".
It
~
I/l
I
I
!
I
- 0 '. '
~k-i1l'
J
., .
.
<OIl
...9
~
N
"'
m
ro
I
110
-
--
.-.:
!
;.
I:, ~
Ii ~""
: :1'
, h1
, .~
.i":
;'t
~
.~
"
I . Ii
\ 1\
I Ii:
II'
I'
II
I.
, I,
..
I:,
.-.,
,t i.;
~ ,;!'
t',,:
.', I'
,.,."
~~ i '..
"
',11
..,1
,;: I
; ~ : ! i
t~?~ ~' I
:<.' j . .
:-.,'
;<!
: I
. I:!
. .
1\: I
',",1
. .~.... '. j
..' I
."....:.:l\
.'.",.'.
.'.i
. , .
;:1:'
..,
, I
I
I
d ~I
I ... . ~
Ii
'.,
" .:,
.'1 '
.!:.:\.
. " ~ ~ !
. ,.;.1
':~\ ~ l, .
",.;,:,,'
:;:;:i
I '~, ;.
,I
.,'
I ,;
,.'
:j',
. , ~
,.
: ~~.,;; I
u
"-
,~
.~..".'~t""'~W'-""""',,,\
j;~' '~\
.~ \
~ ~
~ II
l
'~~,
~~!~
~'')r,,~...._
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPR~~OVE/i)OR
AGEN A
NO.
Discussion Item Engineering ~
ITEM Accept Petition/
NO. Woodbine street BY: Todd J. Haas BY:
...3.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution deCl~ing
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of feasibility
report for the improvements of watermain, project No. 92-6 in the
area along Woodbine street NW south of l43rd Avenue NW.
Rosella Sonsteby of 4151 - l4lst Avenue NW is the owner of 3
vacant lots of the 8 existing lots along Woodbine street NW. The
3 lots are located on the west side of Woodbine street NW. Staff
believes the lots are as follows:
14268 Woodbine street NW
14278 Woodbine street NW
14288 Woodbine Street NW
The City of Andover's policy has been to consider accepting
petitions if 51% of the property owners have an interest in the
improvement.
This request was made by Ms. Sonsteby due to the watermain that
must be constructed from Vintage Street NW south of l43rd Avenue
NW to The Meadows of Round Lake.
options
1. Require Ms. Sonsteby to circulate the petition to the 5 other
lots.
2. Accept petition as is and prepare a feasibility report because
the petition has been validated to contain the signatures of
more than 35% of the effected property owners.
3. The City Council may wish to do nothing until Ms. Sonsteby has
at least 51% in favor of the improvement.
4. City Council order the project under their motion with a 4/5
vote and assess Ms. Sonsteby for the 3 vacant lots and the
City defer the assessments for the other 5 lots.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
~J
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF WATERMAIN
NO. 92-6 IN THE
NW AREA.
, PROJECT
AREA ALONG WOODBINE STREET NW SOUTH OF l43RD AVENUE
WHEREAS, the
March 6
improvements; and
City Council has received a petition, dated
, 19~, requesting the construction of
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
'\
)
12. - (;,
./ -,
\....)
CITY of-ANDOVER
. ECE'VED
HI MAR - 6 1992 1
.-
Da te: mi-LLc)J!v (, ..- 9".:2-..
"
No. '
Gentlemen:
CITY OF ANDOVER
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
~~~ S-uu~~ E::;l ~
do hereby petition that said portioq_of said ar~a/be imp~ove~b~
construction of City ~/ Wa::::ce..v 6>"Y] .r:Fl~A'/ ('31 ~
I, ) /J () -(, .J.'7)' / (' . .
.~Vv0--f-~) It/It.- ~~.
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
"\
, )
SIGNATURE
~
"i
7
LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES
NO
, "
\._j
see -
S u vile She.et
~e~,
~_.
,'-
This petition
Address:
l
/-
//
1/
'.
"
,\
"
.~
;\
') ..--
<.
i..v J:
". II:>
"1)'.;.
-~..
r.
.
-. #'4"
\n,"..., IIl,......9'''~~ f -_,.,
I:. (rj t .~. i
. . ___a"A~-I.L--.___
,-) ~ J"
/;" ~. -: ..?~';'~";:.::~':::;-
,"} "J ,~.:! ..
"-,uhr--"'J,,..- --
. .~-_.. '." .,
- -:".... -: ..'.....9 r ..,~...c \
:CC'I.-)
(fJ
,
, /,
--- !" ,
".~'
k ..'
i!J' .. ..
..
....
(;:~
'"
'.I)IC'm1 C
(H) ~:_ Z
,.........;, ~ C
.,;..,........y .,,.,, ~
,..~.~ 'It) (")
(--( J ; ~
Cfil I I" 'ft. 'e"..,' ~ -t
('} 1..\
. ~...---;t,~"",\"U"""""'... en
!?,~9i J.", lJ:t..JO#q.:;-f
:':J... {t"} l~t~" ~
) .'j
~(
Y".
I
.. ..
f:.j ,n'1c (OLl) ......" :-
<1~1 ~Z 1'1 (Ij
':.'-;.' -. ~
,;.. ''i:i! (094 S
(JJ ~
on
,.~J (OtSI 9 C)
1'1
1"1 '-II}
CII fOHn ~
(ITJ
......".,
:; to"'Jl
((J
.
,~
I:
>S, I
W" .. Ilia) .;.
(~)
/:: .
~-t. h:~.~I;~
.'t." 1"_',1".1
.....
=. ~,
,
)
~
@
~.
..
--.,.., ._--------
'.
I
I
I
" J..~...,<; L,;:':o"
., /1
,u:} i __.
~-
(t"--,J
(1/
/
/
I
._~--~
I
I
~
.~-
.,-""',,.\"i.
(l1f)~~:"! "
'3^'It
, ..jt...~~...
... ~ ,:tIl'f"CoHIIf':'.
: (U) ;; (d/ ('0'";
-:: ......!.::.",
...., ,..,.....!-' .,,......, -"'"1' ~
t.;........, , ......1/~,. ~
:o.~..\ {~O1l1 "'"
I~.,. 0
o
o
III
Z
1'1
(HJ ((J)
."''''' ('""I) ~
z
rr'/ ~I (Ii) '~l %>.
,c",lj 'I (tNUl' 'I
(~lCII
t ICS~J " (C6'ul M
~..l."'O';
""'rn'
""..C'"tr,'
rfI
(11/
~OOIJ
..\
rn/?
f'Q
(..1
)fill'''
"'1
~ fOI~U
.... I,rl
(I')
{t19",1
"'4'/
/~IA'I
(If)
.,.. ./0(01'
(IT)
(01 ilL
(If/::i
CII
-l
1".01l
111/
foelll ~
(")
,neoo')
(<I)
1060" ~
(lI)
..:~...
..)',~ .d'....
I ~,r.<c~. __
", ............
hrl
~ 10'0"
1"/
_Ot,
~
ICl90r J ...
<";"~f
" "tI.
j't
~
,J
'.'....:.."~i',."'i'."'~~'~:.,,,'"\'''
-~ .....
jj --'li.
N,
.~j'i~J
~1 ~
;'~ .Hi
:,.
\"
~;-~--
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO.
4.
Discussion Items
ml
City Of Andover
1685 & 1785 x-town
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT '})
Planning ~~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
March 17, 1992
Blv
BY:
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review and approve the Special Use
Permit request of the City of Andover to conduct sales (tree)
and other related activities on the properties located at 1685 and
1785 Crosstown Boulevard NW, legally described on the attached
resolution. The City will be conducting the sale during
"Recycling Day" on April 25, 1992.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
'~
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, establishes those uses allowed by
Special Use Permit. In an R-l, Single Family Rural District,
Christmas tree sales are allowed by the granting of a Special Use
Permit. Staff interprets this section to also include the sale of
other species of trees as well.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall examine
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Planning & zoning Review
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their March 10, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the Special Use Permit request
with a condition. Attached for your review is the staff report
from the meeting and a proposed resolution for Council review and
approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~l TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
\
, )
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE S?ECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF THE
CITY OF ANDOVER TO CONDUCT SALES (TREE) AND OTH~R RELATED
A~TIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH "RECYCLING DAY" ON THE PROPERTY LOCATEC
AT 1685 AND 1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW.
WHEREAS, The City of Andover has requested a Special Use
Permit to conduct sales (tree) and other related activities
associated with "Recycling Day" on the properties located at 1685
and 1785 Crosstown Boulevard NW, legally described as follows:
The East 990 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
AND
The West 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and
\
,--.-J
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to allow the City of Andover to
conduct sales (tree) and other related activities associated with
"Recycling Day" on said properties with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
17th day of March, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kennetno.----ort te~Mayo r
\
.J
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
.."~
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 10, 1992
DATE
AGENDA ITEM
6. city of Andover
Special Use Permit
Recycling Activities
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg ~
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by the City of Andover to conduct
sales and other related activities associated with the "Andover
Recycling Day" on the property located at 1685 and 1785 Crosstown
Boulevard NW, legally described as follows:
The East 990 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
AND
\
'-~
The West 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit,
outlining conditions and procedures.
GENERAL REVIEW
The City as a part of the "Andover Recycling Day" will be inviting
local nurseries to conduct tree sales on the above indicated
property. Since Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 allows the selling
of Christmas trees in residential districts by Special Use Permit,
Staff believes it is necessary to require a Special Use Permit for
the tree sale and any other related activities associated with
"Recycling Day".
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit requested
by the City of Andover to conduct sales and other related
activities associated with "Recycling Day".
,
-)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
J
'-/
"
, Property Address
/ SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(c&S-
11gs -)<ItA) (!rl)<<55-!ow~
A/vel
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addition
PIN 2z- 32-2 4-floco I
attach the complete legal)
Plat Parcel
(If metes and bounds,
-:l- O()o z...
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request ~~
;;;;;~~ :;~
+~
I,r( H)
~::/::; A"f
"/In .
~~
"
,~)
Section of Ordinance 7.63
Current Zoning
/{- /
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant ~ cI ~lkr
Address /hE:?s era .)4 /?; v. . A/uJ
Home Phone Business Phone
Signature I~ ~ C1 ~
.?S-S- S""/b(j
Date Z-Z s-:: 72
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
\
Business Phone
~
Signature
Date
*********************************************************************
\
)
"
'--)
"-)
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
Ci ty of Andover: "
,
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Application Fees:
Commercial
Residential
Amended SUP
Rec1fording Fee
$190.00
$150.00
$ 50.00
$ 15.00
Date Paid
jf
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
~J
'\
\....J
"\
,-J
" ,; L: ~,- ;..,,, ".
,9\
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
,
"
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, March 10, 1992 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, to review the Special Use Permit
request of the City of Andover to conduct sales and other related
activities associated with the "Andover Recycling Day" on the
property located at 1685 and 1785 Crosstown Boulevard NW, legally
described as follows:
The East 990 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter or Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
AND
The West 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter or Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota; Subject to any Easements of Record.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
f~f#
Victoria Vo , City Clerk
Publication dates: February 28, 1992
March 6, 1992
22-32-24-42-0002
Ken & Mary Slyzuk
15211 Nightingale st. NW
Andover, MN 55304
, "3-32-24-23-0001
\
'-... ...-Ie Gaughan Co.
299 Coon Rapids Blvd
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
23-32-24-33-0002
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
OCCUPANT
1831 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
. \
\.J
F '\
\..J
labelsdave
22-32-24-14-0002
Center Oaks
2384 l36th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
23-32-24-32-0002
Lora Hamilton
6615 Hwy 10 NW
Anoka, MN 55303
22-32-24-13-0003
John E. & J.A. Mckelvey
Bank plus
P.o. Box 47524
San Antonio, TX 78265
OCCUPANT
15327 Nightingale st. NW
Andover, MN 55304
22-32-24-42-0003
Larold E. Thompson
10040 - 20lst Ave
Elk River, MN 55330
22-32-24-42-0004
steven Louden
Western Bank
100 North Philips
Sioux FaIls, SD 57102
OCCUPANT
1813 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
,.';t~'~"""'-'C<""'''',\\
:/ ";ij,
,~tl~
~l ~
~~ )
-.,~~,- -,~
~.~""~~'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
~J.M Crosstown Payment/
-5. Anoka County
~~t::};OR
BYfl
v
The City Council is requested to consider the cost that the
City billed the County for the construction of Crosstown
Boulevard from 140th Avenue NW to l33rd Avenue NW.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
Engineering
BY:
Jim Schrantz
,
The agreement with Anoka County on the construction of
Crosstown Boulevard from l40th Avenue to l33rd Avenue was
approved to sign on May 19, 1987 and was signed by Andover on
August 14, 1987 and by the County on August 18, 1987; on
January 19, 1988 the City ordered a feasibility report for
Project 88-1, Crosstown Boulevard between l40th Avenue and
Bunker Lake Boulevard; on April 5, 1988 the City agreed with
the DNR that the City would construct a bridge and do
mitigation to the Red Oak pond area; the County approved our
plans and specs.
Under Project 88-1, I billed the County for water items that
they should not have been billed for and also for 100% of the
curb and gutter which the City agreed to pay 50% of, which
amounts to $28,765.13.
The area that we disagree on is the payment for the bridge.
Anoka County staff does not believe that the County should pay
for the bridge which we have billed them for at $124,681.50.
They believe that the bridge is part of the "permit mitigation"
as required by the DNR and should not be payed for.
We believe that the County approved the plans knowing of the
bridge and that the County Commissioner also knew that we were
building a bridge and expected the County to pay for the cost
of the bridge.
An agency constructing a street (State, County or City) is
required to construct equalizer pipes or a bridge under the
road whenever there is water that ponds on both sides of the
road.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
'--
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
~ Summary of Costs Billed to Anoka County
Under Project 88-1, we billed $530,697.57 of which $28,765.13
was for watermain items and 100% of the curb of which we had
agreed on 50%. The amount of $501.932.44 is agreeable.
Under Project 87-6 and 87-6B, we billed $77,806.17 and
$187,63l.02 which we agreed on.
Under Project 88-1B, Bridge Project, we billed $124,681.50 of
which they propose to pay the City $0.00.
Under project 88-1, Right-of-Way Aquisition, we billed
$66,942.50 and they agreed to pay that amount.
Under Project 87-3B, Right-of-Way Aquisition, we billed
$60,054.00 and they agreed to pay that amount.
Under Project 87-3B, after they pay the $60,054.00 for the
right-of-way cost the only thing they have not paid for is the
"Wall" which Jon Olson and Paul Ruud have said they do not
intend to pay for, which was billed out as $39,000.00.
Total amount billed (excluding the wall and the $28,765.13 that
was over billed) is: $1,019,047.63
\
~
The amount they propose to pay is:
$894,366.13
- $124,681.50
The $124,681.50 is the amount of the bridge.
. ,
I
'J
,(~)
"-~ \", ",,/
-""""..-"",
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO.
t..
Approve Revised
Precinct Boundaries
BY:
v. Volk ~~.
March 17 199~
"
APPROVE~ FOR
AG rJ' t
k:V
DATE
AGENDA SEC[ION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Sta f, Comm., Commissi ns
Admin.
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
which splits Precincts 1 and 3 and designates polling places for
these precincts and a change for Precinct 2. Enclosed in your
packets is a map showing the new boundaries.
Currently there are 2,971 registered voters in Precinct 1. The
split will have 1,654 voters in Precinct 1 (the area north of
l57th Avenue) and 1,407 in Precinct lA (the area south of l57th
Avenue) .
Precinct 3 currently has 3,160 registered voters. The split will
result in 1,223 voters in Precinct 3 (the area north of Andover
Boulevard) and 1,937 voters in Precinct 3A (the area south of
Andover Boulevard).
The lines were drawn with the help of the County's GIS Office
using census blocks as the boundaries as required by the
Secretary of State's office.
The polling places for the precincts will be as follows:
Precinct 1 - Andover Fire Station #2
Precinct lA- Grace Lutheran Church
Precinct 2 - Riverdale Assembly of God Church (Formerly Anoka
Assembly of God Church)
Precinct 3 - Andover Elementary School
Precinct 3A- Andover Fire Station #1
Precinct 4 - Family of Christ Lutheran Church
These changes will take effect in September for the State Primary
Election. The State Redistricting Panel requires that these
boundary changes be submitted by March 30, 1992.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
ro
SECOND BY
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COIJNTY OF ANOK^
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
/
NO. R
A RESOLUTION DIVIDING THE CITY OF ANDOVER INTO SIX (6) VO~ING
PRECINCTS, SETTING FORTH BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES FOR EACH.
WHEREAS, there has been a sizeable increase in the number of
registered voters in the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, Precincts 1 and 3 contain over 2,500 registered
voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that long lines are
becoming a problem at the existing precincts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby revise the voting precincts and
designate new polling places, to be effective with the State
Primary Election, Tuesday, S~ptember 8, 1992.
Precinct 1 - All that area lying west of County Road 9 (Round
Lake Boulevard) to the westerly city limits and
north of a line drawn west from County Road 9
along l57th Avenue to 7th Avenue and north along
7th Avenue to l59th Avenue and west to the city
limi ts .
\.
'- J
Polling Place: Andover Fire Station #2
16603 Valley Drive N.W.
Precinct 1A- All that area lying west of County Road 9 (Round
Lake Boulevard) to the westerly city limits and
south of a line drawn west from County Road 9
along l57th Avenue to 7th Avenue and north along
7th Avenue to l59th Avenue and west to the city
limits.
Polling Place: Gracp. Lutheran Church
13655 Round Lake Boulevard
Precinct 2 - All that area lying SQuth of County Road 116
(Bunker Lake Boulevard) to the southerly,
easterly, and westerly city limits.
Polling Place: Riverdale Assembly of God Church
3210 Bunker Lake Boulevard N.W.
\.
J
.-/
Precinct 3- All that area lying south of County Road 20
(16lst Avenue) and north of a line drawn from the
easterly city limits along Andover Boulevard to
Crosstown Boulevard, south along Crosstown Boule-
vard to South Coon Creek Drive and west along
South Coon Creek Drive to County Road 9 (Round
Lake Boulevard).
Polling Place: Andover Elementary School
14950 Hanson Boulevard N.W.
)
'--,
Precinct 3A- All that area lying south of a line drawn from the
easterly city limits along Andover Boulevard to
Crosstown Boulevard, south along Crosstown Boule-
vard to South Coon Creek Drive and west along
South Coon Creek Drive to County Road 9 (Round
Lake Boulevard) and north of County Road 116
(Bunker Lake Boulevard) from the easterly city
limits to County Road 9 (Round Lake Boulevard).
Polling Place: Andover Fire Station *1
13875 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
"
Precinct 4 - All that area lying north of County Road 20
(l6lst Avenue) between County Road 9 (Round
Lake Boulevard) and the easterly City Limits.
Polling Place: Family of Christ Lutheran Church
16045 Nightingale Street N.W.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th
day of
March
, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
'\
j
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
)
/
i(!'~'~"P."~'C""'''''\\
i~ ~!
:~ ~
.,~ I....~
,~~ i?
~ jI
!~, Ii'
~"~m "l
'H,,"x;~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECllDN .
NO. SEa f, Comm~ttee, Comm
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
March 17, 1992
ITEM
NO.
7.
Assessment Abatement/
Delinquent utilities
BY:
v. VOlk~t
APPRO~E~VR
AGENDm
Bvll
V
The city Council is requested to approve an assessment abatement
for the property known as PIN 32 32 24 44 0028 in the amount of
$311.66 under County Fund 1965 (delinquent utilities) and $50.97
under County Fund 1966 (delinquent street lights).
According to the Finance Department, these bills should not have
been certified to the taxes.
Howard Koolick will be present to provide additional information
if necessary.
'-
'-......-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,,~.,."ery"O'~',\
i/.' '\
$1 '~
/ '\ l I
0"" I
',~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
~
staff, Committee, Comm.
~TJ.M Authorize Repair of
~. GraderMotor
Public Works
APPR~V~D FOR
AGPr~A "-!
~(p
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Frank stone
B~.
I
On October 15, 1991 Council approved replacing the engine in our
motor grader, but due to the early snowstorm we were unable to
have this work done. Now the time has come because the machine
has lost about all its power and we should go ahead with repairs
if Council approves.
Total
$8,486.00
2,324.00
400.00
$11,210.00
New Engine
Tandem Chains
Transportation
'-
These repairs will have to come out of the Snow and Ice and
streets and Highways Department operating budget. If there is
an increase in cost of repairs, I will inform Mayor and Council
the night of the meeting. I have included a copy of the agenda
item from the October 15, 1991 meeting that was approved.
COUNCIL ACTION
\.~
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~
~~
\
\._)
(rj(')
.,Y
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 15, 1991
DATE
ORIGINATING OEPAHIMENT
Public Works
,-
6/
APPROV~. ...;FOR _
AGEn /
BY: 1 -
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM purchase Motor/Grader
NO. E'
i:;J., ngwe
Frank Stone
BY:
We are having a problem with the engine in our grader. e are
using a large amount of oil and it is smoking badly out of the
engine breather. We have had the John Deere mechanic look at the
unit. After doing a compression check on the engine only one
cylinder is holding. The standard compression is 350. No.1
cylinder is 340, No.2 cylinder is 320, No.3 cylinder is 360,
No. 4 cylinder is 240, No. 5 cylinder is 280, and No.6 cylinder
is 240. The only thing we can do is to rebuild the engine we
have at a cost of $6,266.00 with a guarantee of 6 ffionths or a new
engine for a cost of $8,486.00 with a one year guarantee.
We also have to rebuild the chains on the rear tandoms. This is
about two years over due! The cost is $2,324.00.
For this work to be done the unit will have to be trar.G~orted to
Midwest Mechanical in Burnsville. The round trip estim;te cost
is $400.00.
I recommend the new engine and have the rear tandom chains
repairied at the same time. I know this wipes out Streets &
Highways and Snow & Ice Vehicle Repair budgets, but we have to
- keep this unit going.
New Engine
Tandom Chains
Transportation
Total Repair
$8,486.00
$2,324.00
$400.00
$11,210.00
This unit gets a lot of hour:, 011 it in the winter and summet. i.
did have it on the 1993 Capital Budget for replacement. If Wd
replace the engine we might be able to extend it to 1994.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,
I
...j
..,~"~"C""~-'''C'''''''~,,-.
;f't,
" \
~ ~
~1_ ~
I\,'
'\ 1i
"'. .,if'
." ,
'-""
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
ITEM
NO. Approve Election Resul s/
9. Fi re Chief BY:
Fire Dept.
\ ~,
V. Volk \)"
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NQ Staff, Comm., Commissi ns
The City Council is requested to approve the Fire Department
election of officers as follows:
Fire Chief - Dale Mashuga
Assistant Chief - Jim Pierson
The election was held Wednesday, March 11, 1992.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
.---'
.y"/
A~DOVER
FIRE
DEPARTMENT
1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
Minutes of the Special Election for Chief on March l~th , 1992
Election of Chief
Meeting was called to order by the Andover Fire Dept.
Election committee at 7:12 PM.
Nomination for Chief were as follows;
Dale Mashuga
Bob Peach
Bob Peach declined the nomination.
Dale Mashuga was elected by a majority vote.
:J
Nominations for Asst Chief were as follows ;
Jim Pierson
Bob Peach
Motion was made by Paul Gengler
That the election for the Asst. Chief be held at this time.
seconded by Larry Elfelt
Motion Passed
Bob Peach declined the nomination.
Motion was made by Larry Elfelt
That Jim Pierson be named Asst. Chief by acclamation.
seconded by Paul Gengler
Motion Passed
Jim Pierson was elected by acclamation.
Meeting was called to a close at 7:33 PM
.:J
Respectfully submitted by
David L. Szyplinski
Secretary f he An
-------- . \
(, \)\J
Dept.
'l,~rc1"."""'""""~"\'
# '\
,~t i
'..;"',>, ,,1/'
~.",~~__~r
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Narch l7;
AGENDA SEC[IDN . . ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Sta f, Comm., Commlssl ns
ITEM Award Bid/Refurbishing
NO.
/6. Fi re Truck BY:
Fire Dept.
" \,
V. Volk V.
On Monday, March 9, 1992 bids were opened for the refurbishing of
4881.
The following bids were received:
J & B Fabricating
General Safety
$49,500
48,975
Alexis
86,312
J & B Fabricating's bid was rejected because they did not provide
a bid bond.
'--
A representative of the Fire Department will be present to
discuss this with Council.
'--
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
/~~,,'n''''~.''.''''''',,\
~j' .~
,'j" "
:.J' ;i."... ..1\
~ cj;, ai
\", ,"~
, ,/
'", .#'. '"
-.~.,~.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
H&::':-C~l
17,
1992
Fire Dept.
::pll"
AGENDA SECnON . . ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NQ Staff, Comm. CommlSSlo s
ITEM
NO.
II.
Approve ExpenditurejWi ing
& Plbg./Hose Washer BY:
, \
V. volk\V
The City Council is requested to award the bid for the
installation of the hose washer system at Fire Stations 1 and 2
to The Plumbery and to award the bid to wire the hose washer and
redo wiring for truck connections to 3-Way Electric.
Copies of the bids are attached. A representative of the Fire
Department will be present to discuss this item with Council.
V:Attach.
'-
, MOTION BY
'-~
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Jroposal
Page No.
of
Pages
r
:)
mPLUMBERyJt
HOME CENTER
HUTTON AND ROWE, INC.
2126 2ND AVENUE NORTH
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
612-427-2540
PRo~~Ef/)llJffiD rI RE DEPT.
PHONE
6'~L09-92
STREET
13875 CROSSTOWN BLVD.
JOB N'~~ME
CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE
ANDOVER, MN 55304
JOB LOS'~~
ARCHITECT
04 TE OF PLANS
A 6o~mo~bOC
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
PROVIDE HOT AND COLD WATER SUPPLY TO "CHIEF'S CHOICE" CLEANING SYSTEM
WITH BALL VALVE SHUT-OFFS.
PROVIDE 3/4" SCH. 80 TYPE A53 CONTINUOUS WELD PIPE TO REMOTE STATIONS
AND HOSE WASHER.
ATTACH AND PROVIDE HOOK-UP FOR REMOTE STATIONS AND HOSE WASHER ON
EXISTING WALLS.
SUPPORT PIPING SYSTEM WITH WALL PLATE AND SPLIT RING EXTIONSION HANGER
ON VERTICALS WITH TOP BEAM CLAMPS AND SPLIT RING HANGERS ON HORIZONTALS
SPACED TO CODE.
,)
*** ALL PIPING PER ATTACHED DRAWING. ***
*** PIPE RATED FOR MAX 1000 PSI PRESSURE. ***
** ALL FITTINGS FORGED STEEL RATED 2000# MINIMUM **
** ALL VALVES AFTER PUMP TO BE 2000# CARBON STEEL 2-PIECE VALVES. **
** ALL UNIONS FORGED STEEL 3000# **
***** NO PERMIT FEE INCLUDED IN THIS BID. *****
**** ALL LABOR, TAXES, AND MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THIS BID. ****
All wlter ptpmg to be Type M Copper. All Waste 4. Vent to be A.B.s. Plutic. We shall stand no expense fOI meter deposit, water service charges. metro
Jewer chaJ'~s. unit fees. seWf'r ~stem horn or water Jystem to. in connection with this building.
FOR THE ABOVE JOB YOUR TAX AND COST SHALL BE 5; 1 ,960.00
ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY AND NO/100
TERMS: 50% TO START AND BALANCE UPON COMPLETION.
All materia' i. guaranteed to be n speCIfied. All won. to be completed in a workmanlike
manner .teordina to standard practices. Any alter.tion or deviation from above sJ)K.I.ca.
tions in~Yinl extra costs will be eJ:ecuted only upon written orders. and WIll become an
extra cha,..e over and above the estimate. All aereements contlneent upon ,trikes. accldenls
or delilys beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance.
') Our workers are fully covered by Wor1l;men.. Compensataon Insurance.
\.....
,.
Authorized
Signature
Note: This proposal may b
withdrawn by us if not acc;e It
Arrtpfantt of Jroposal- The above prices. specifications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Signature
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
Finance charge of 1.32% per month on all accounts over 30 days old. Annual finance charge is 16%.
[ "
m;LUMBERY~ HUTTON AND ROWE, INC.
2126 2ND AVENUE NORTH
J HOME CENTER ANOKA. MINNESOTA 55303
612-427-2540
PROPOSAL SUBMITTEO TO PHONE I DATE
ANDOVER FIRE DEPT. 03-09-92
STREET JOB NAME
13875 CROSSTOWN BLVD. SAME
CITY. STATE AND liP CODE JOB LOCATION
ANDOVER, MN 55304 SAME
ARCHITECT I DATE OF. PLANS ~~~OB PHONE
A DVR2.DOC
We hereby submit specifications and estimates tor:
PROVIDE HOT AND COLD WATER SUPPLY TO "CHIEF'S CHOICE" CLEANING SYSTEM
WITH BALL VALVE SHUT-OFFS.
PROVIDE 3/411 SCH. 80 TYPE A53 CONTINUOUS WELD PIPE TO REMOTE STATIONS
AND HOSE WASHER.
ATTACH AND PROVIDE HOOK-UP FOR REMOTE STATIONS AND HOSE WASHER ON
EXISTING WALLS.
SUPPORT PIPING SYSTEM WITH WALL PLATE AND SPLIT RING EXTIONSION HANGER
ON VERTICALS WITH TOP BEAM CLAMPS AND SPLIT RING HANGERS ON HORIZONTALS I
SPACED TO CODE.
*** ALL PIPING PER ATTACHED DRAWING. ***
'\ *** PIPE RATED FOR MAX 1000 PSI PRESSURE. ***
J ** ALL FITTINGS FORGED STEEL RATED 2000# MINIMUM **
** ALL VALVES AFTER PUMP TO BE 2000# CARBON STEEL 2-PIECE VALVES. **
** ALL UNIONS FORGED STEEL 3000# **
***** NO PERMIT FEE INCLUDED IN THIS BID. *****
**** ALL LABOR, TAXES, AND MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THIS BID. ****
I
All water piptng to be Type M Copper. All Waste A. Vent to be A.B.s. Plutic. We shall Itand no expense for meter deposit, water service chugel. metro
lewer char~s, unit fees. ~wt, ~stem from or water system to. in connection with this building.
FOR THE ABOVE JOB YOUR TAX AND COST SHALL BE $ 1,675.00
ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY AND NO/100
TERMS: 50% TO START AND BALANCE UPON COMPLETION.
All m.terial is guaranteed to be as specifie-d. All work to be completed in a workmanlike Authorized
manne' .ecordinl to standard practices. Any .lter.tion or deviation from above ,peclfica.
tions involvin. edr. costs will be e.ecuted only upon written orders. and Will become an Signature
eatr. char.. over and abovt the estimat.. All .ereements contlnlent upon strikes. accldenls Note: This proposal may be
or dela)'l beyond our control. Owner to carry fire. tornado and other nee.sury insurance. withdrawn by us If not aCC;~d ,thin days. A
-...... Our workers .re fully covered by Workmen's Cornpenwbon Insurance.
)
"( .. .Atrtptanrt of 'roposal- The above prices. specifications ' C:.A' /3xf~ - .~
-
Signature ---/ -f
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authOrized "-
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above,
Date of Acceplance: Signature
~ A
Jrnpnllal
Page No.
of
Pages
//
""'......'..
1IiOl::...,
Finance charge of 1.32% per month on all accounts over 30 days old. Annual finance charge is 16%.
[
~ropo5al
3-WAY ELECTRIC
19949 St. Francis Blvd.
Anoka, MN 55303
753-5022
,
r;R~
fl1~ r\.1 II
9:1-
JOB NAME
CI1Y. STATE AND ZIP CODE
JOB LOCATION
w. hereby lubmll: lpedflcatlonl and eallmateslor:
+,- 0 f..s
.Di5C6i'1n
u.5"
, ~
.e :{9ropoll't hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance w~h above specif1tions. for the sum of:
dollars ($ 'i/9 51 ~ ).
Payment to be made aiAJli1se. r'\ ,j 0 6
,.
(S
c'a mQi~hJ
AI matorialll guarontood 10 be . lpeclfied. A' -" 10 be """",,,",odin. _1Ilo manner
oocordl~ to ltandard prOOl_. Any at_Ions '" dwl.._ !romtho _ opocll<:al_1mIoIYIng
extraCOSll will be executed only uponwrtnen ordera. and w11~an extra charge av. and aw
the ..tlmlt.. AI agree"*"" contingent upon Itrlkel.lICddentl ordelaya beyand ourcontroL Owner
to carry fire, wind damage and other rteC8llaf)' .,.....ara. Our workera are fully cowred by
Workmen's ~nsatlon Insurance.
Authorized ~ 11.. _ _ .
Sig~ature ~
Note: This proposal ~Abe w~hdrawn by us
if not accepted within '1/.J days.
r
\. ) ~cceptance of lBropo~al The' above prices.
specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.
You are authorized to do the wor!< as specified. Payment will be made as
outiined above.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
Signature
Sr-dy Perm 1109
~.
)
/
~ropo~al
3-WAY ELECTRIC
19949 SI. Francis Blvd.
Anoka. MN 55303
753-5022
F//<.'L
D~
PHONE
rc t\ ( I
f)..
JOB NAME
CITY. STATE AND ZlP CODE
JOB LOCATION
w. hereby lubmIllpedflcallonl and estlmat.. for:
,
)
~t ~ropOll't ~erebY to f~rnish m~te:ialand I~bor - JmPlete in accordance with above specifications(~he sum of:
lJJ 1\ e, h Job I ~ CD IYlOI-.z...f.e.c: dollars ($ 727 . ).
Payment to be made as follows:
Al matorial II g_ to be . opocIflod. AI work to be """",",od In . worknwllka mon_
aa:ordlng to Itandard 1"_' Any al.rallo", Ot _allon. !romtho _ ,-'1c:oI1ora involving
dr. COlli will be; executed only upon wrtnen on:ters. and w1lbec:orT>>an extrachargefN<< and eo...
the estlmat.. AI ",reerTWltl contingent upon atrlc8l, accidents or delays beyond our controL Own<<
10 carry fir.. wind damage and otMr neceuary nsuranoe. Our workerl are fully COWired by
Workmen', ~nsallon InIwanca.
Authorized
Signature
Note: This pr~al may be withdrawn by us
if not accepted within days.
~ ) m:cceptance of fjroposal - The' above prices,
specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.
You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as
outlined above.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
Signature
Speedy Parm 1109
.""~""'~""c"cv_"""''''''\.
t" "I
~\ }
c.... , .....
'~;;!I>'Ii
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
.... r ..L ,-y
~TJM Report/9l-27/Eldorado
fil. street
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
March 17, 1992
Engineering
APP:~ROV~DI ~
AGE r;u
BY:
V
BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution recelvlng
the feasibility report and calling public hearing for Project
91-27, MSA street and storm drain construction for Eldorado
Street in the Meadows of Round Lake.
"
We have not proposed a public hearing now because the south part
of segment *1 will probably not be assessed, segment *2 through
the plat will be assessed as part of the plat with MSA paying for
the cost of the extra structure to be a 9 ton street, and segment
*3 l47th Avenue NW may be constructed at a somewhat later date.
Bunker Lake Boulevard/Round Lake Boulevard project and this
project are going to exhaust the MSA account and "then some".
The existing balance is about $307,000.
Bunker Lake Boulevard/Round Lake Boulevard is estimated at
$300,000 to be paid in 1993 and segment *1 of Eldorado Street is
estimated at about $470,000 including right-of-way.
'--
Andover's 1993 allotment will be about $430,000.
Proposed Projects:
Round Lake Blvd. $300,000
Eldorado st. 470,000
$770,000
Estimated Funds:
Existing $307,000
1993 Allotment 430,000
$737,000
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
,J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE
PROJECT NO. 9l-27A IN THE ELDORADO STREET AND l47TH
AVENUE NW FROM BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD TO CSAH #7 AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Council Motion on the 21st
day of June , 19 91 , a Feasibility Report has been
prepared by TKDA for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
17th day of March , 1992 ; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of.$ 801,800.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 9l-27A, for the improvements.
2. The Council will consider the improvement8 in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
,~ of the improvement of $ 801,800.00
3. A public hearing shall be held for the segment that will be
assessed before the segment is ordered by the City Council.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
)
:~~
,.,~~~/.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 17, 1992
~
ITEM Accept Easement/90-25
NO.
1.3 .
~~~~~D \
~ l)L/
BY: /
J
The City Council is requested to accept the easement for Project
90-25 (watermain construction to serve the Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District Building) from the County of Anoka for a
permanent easement for utility purposes.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
Engineering
BY:
~
Todd J. Haas
'----
,
~
MOTION BY
I TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Form No, 31.M-UUIT CLAIM DEED
Corporation or Partnership
to Corporation or Partnership
Minnesota Uniform ConveYancing Blank, (1978)
M,Uer.Oavi,Co.. Minneapolis
,
'.--j
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19_
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT
Date:
F.t.b(t,(.w6'
II
.19 q1-
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, County of Anoka
. a fOldil6t !><<hdilll$io....
Minnesota ,Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to
the City of Andover
a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:
under the laws of
t Gran tee,
t real property in
See reVerse side for complete legal description.
,--)
{if more space is needed, continue on back'
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
:~m~
Its C~i~ ~h~Board
By ~(hu~v Ad~~
\rri:. I' ~',l I :I'~ ~~f:llnp 111.'[1'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
ANOKA
} ss.
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
by~ t.vh.....f-
the CJ\~I( N- f-h~ ~u~ BO<lva.
of COllnt of ka
under the laws of Mi nnp!=:orri
~
day of :r
..J.t"...... ~ AAcLin "-
tl-lL ~lJ. AdllMIM'~jy,,-bv
,a polUit41 ~"hdM.I....
, on behalf of the (.j wtl 'n "" A ""~
~Qt~ .
SIGNA E or PERSON TAKING ACKN~WLEDGMENT
. ,
Till Statement. for the real proptrty dllcribad In thb Initrument ahould
be lent to (lncluda n.me and .ddr... of Gr.ntu):
I/-ij,
and
and
,19~,
i THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS):
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.~
Andover; MN 55304
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
,
,
.,
'-- .,/
. ..
"-
\.J
:J
o
..
A permanent easement for utility purposes over, under and across
the following described property:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Plat of Hills of
Bunker Lake, Section 35, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota1 thence South B9 degrees 59 minutes 47 seconds East a
distance of 29B.91 feet1 thence South 0 degrees 0 minutes 13
seconds West a distance of 5B.35 feet to the point of beginning
of an easement 20 feet in width Southerly and at right angles
from the following described line: thence South BB degrees 50
minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 105.70 feet1 thence
Easterly a distance of 31B. 06 feet along a tangential curve
concave to the North, tpe central angle of which is 9 degrees 22
minutes 47 seconds1 thence North Bl degrees 4G minutes 42
seconds East a distance of 457.53 feet and there terminating.
NOTICE
Anoka,
19_,
Dated:
IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Andover, County of
State of Minnesota, has accepted on
the above described easement in this document.
, 19
CITY OF ANDOVER
(SEAL)
By
Clerk
~
'~"'~.t""i'''''~'~,"'''''''O'\",
l\
I~j ~,
~1 ,~
1 ~
~ ,
'\.1'
''\.,..1
'\" /
~~~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
~gENDA rflrflb'lNscussion items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
March 17, 1992
ITEM Approve Final Platl
NO. I~. Weybridge
~
APPROV~FOR
AGENf
"
BY: )
,
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for
Weybridge, Phase I as requested by Jerry and Carol Windschitl.
The 13 lots proposed of the final plat are in compliance with the
preliminary plat.
It is recommended that the final plat be approved subject to the
following:
1. Revised preliminary plat and grading plan. See attached
letter by staff requesting the revised preliminary plat of
Weybridge.
2. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion.
'--
3. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and
installation costs to be determined by the City Engineer.
4. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site
which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is
completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and
streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and
approved by the City.
5. Weybridge Phase I street light energy and maintenance costs
are to be incorporated with the Creek View Crossing plat to
ensure the 13 lots pay for street lights.
6. Park dedication for Phase I shall require the developer to
pay cash in lieu of land as determined in Ordinance 10,
Section 9.07.
COUNCIL ACTION
'---
MOTION BY
[TO
SECOND BY
~
~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF WEYBRIDGE
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY JERRY AND CAROL WINDSCHITL
IN SECTION 26-32-24. .'
WHEREA.S, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of
Weybridge ; and
WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of
Weybridge
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance
with the preliminary plat; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City
Andover to hereby approve the final plat of
contingent upon receipt of the following:
1. Revised preliminary plat and grading plan.
2. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion.
Council of the City of
Weybridge
3. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation
costs as determined by the City Engineer.
4. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which
is to he determined by the City Engineer or if the site is
completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and
streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and
approved by the City.
5. Weybridge Phase I ~treet light energy and maintenance costs are to
be incorporated with the Creek View Crossing plat to ensure the 13
lots pay for street lights.
6. Park dedication for Phase I shall require the developer to pay
cash in lieu of land as determined in Ordinance 10, Section 9.07.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED citing the following:
1. Developer is responsible to obtain all permits from U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, DNR, Coon Creek Watershed District or any
other agency that is interested in the site.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
17th
day of
March
, 1992 .
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
)
'--./
"'
)
,
/
.~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
"
','
February 19, 1992
Jerry Windschitl
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
3640 - l52nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
RE: Weybridge preliminary Plat
Dear Mr. Windschitl:
Enclosed please find the resolution approving the preliminary
plat. Prior to final plat approval, we are requesting the
preliminary plat be updated to indicate the front setback for
lots 25 and 26 of Block 1 so that a variance can be granted at
the time of final plat; show a radius of 80 feet at the
intersection of 144th Lane NWjWintergreen street NW along lots 25
and 26; and show a engineering schematic for lot 31, Block 7 on
the Grading and Drainage Plan.
In addition, our staff should meet with you to decide on the park
dedication and its property boundry.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
f~/~
Todd J Haas
Assistant City Engineer
TJH:pjg
Enc.
.,
'-)
"~'<""._..~"''''.'''
., ....
!)j!' \
N ~
~"'" . ~
,:\ ,il
i, I
'" ""
"'l... "
.'l!oI;,~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 17,
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
IS".
Engineering
BY:
Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
work and directing final payment for Project 91-4, Hills of
Bunker Lake 4th Addition to Nodland Construction of Alexandria,
Minnesota.
The original contract was for $279,845.00 and the final payment
is for $294,871.00. The final cost includes a change order for
$22,216.00 for the construction of Pond "C".
TKDA recommended final payment.
This project is being assessed on the agenda under the next item.
I
'-'
COUNCIL ACTION
\-- -,,'
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
)
:,J
"\
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJgCT NO. 91-4 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 4TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on June 18 , 1991 , Nodland Construction
of Alexandria, MN has satisfactorily-Completea-Efi-e
construction in accordanc.e wi th such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota that the work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
17th day
City Council at a
regular
meeting this
of
March
, 1992
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
/,,~"".i"""'C'CC""'~\
If .' \~
t( }
"'" :/
'~,"",~fi"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
March 17, 1992
Non-Discussion Item
ITEMHills of Bunker Lake
;~~ 4th Addition
Engineering
BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the three resolutions
1) declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll,
2) waiving the public hearing and 3) adopting the assessments
for Project 91-4, Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition.
John and I have met with a representative of the owner.
See attached waiver of hearing.
Attached: Resolution declaring cost and directing preparation
of assessment roll
Resolution waiving hearing
Resolution adopting assessment roll
Waiver of hearing from developers and landowners
'--
COUNCIL ACTION
, ~ MOTION BY
)
'-- TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~-J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WM., S.S., STREETS AND STORM DRAIN ,
FOR PROJECT NO. 91-4 HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 4TH ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 294,686.47, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the
making of such improvement amount to $ 108,617.28 and work previously
done amount to $ 79.599.00 so that the total cost of the improvement
will be $ 482,902.75
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ - 0 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 482,902.75
2.
CJ
Assessment shall be payable in semi-annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the 15th day of April 1993, and shall bear
interest at the rate of 7% percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
meeting this 17th day of March
, 19~,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, )
-~MOTION by Councilman
RES. NO.
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS FOR PROJECT NO.
91-4, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 4TH ADDITION.
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on March 17,
19 92 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of
the cost of improvements for Project No. 9l-4 and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection; and
WHEREAS, the Developer and benefitting landowners have waived the
public hearing and waived his right to appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
l. The public hearing is hereby waived as requested by the
Developer and benefitting landowners MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City Council at a
regular
~eeting this 17th day of
, )
March
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
r
)
'-J
(J
".-.-
. ')
.......-/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND STREETS, PROJECT NO.
91-4 HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 4TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owner and developer of the above mentioned
property agree with the proposed assessments and waive the public
hearing and waive their right to appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall
constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found
to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in semi-annual
installments, together with principal and accrued interest,
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April,
19 93 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution.
3. The owners of any property so assessed may at any time
pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest
accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
regular
meeting this
l7th
day
of
March
, 19 92 with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution,
and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, "
o
(J
/'
0~
.'
March 13, 1992
RE: Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition
City Project 91-4 Comm. 9938
Dear Mayor and Council:
As owners of the Plat of Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition, we
here with waive the public hearing and accept the assessments
as proposed. Additionally we waive the right of appeal.
"
.."~'<""'".""~~'~''''''\\''.
;f'< ...
,f;'\
fl ~
,- - ?J ~l
0\ I
~, ""
~~, "#,.,'!llt
"""'~-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 17, 1992
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
Howard D. Koolick ~
Finance Director
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Release Plat Escrow
Woodland Creek Second
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to release to Woodland
Development Corporation the plat escrow for Woodland Creek Second
Addition.
BACKGROUND
The City collected an escrow of $2,250 from Woodland Development
Corporation to cover the cost of attorney fees, engineering, signs
and installation. After incurring all costs, the amount remaining
was $973.41.
As with all escrows, interest is earned on the balance until it
!- is refunded. Interest earned from 1988 thru March 17, 1992 is
\_ $195.47, resulting in a total refund of $1,168.88.
The schedule of bills to be approved this evening includes this
refund.
The City will continue to hold the escrow securing the special
assessments which is required in the development contract.
COUNCIL ACTION
./
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
...
, '\
\J
. .>~"~"'''''.~'''''''.~''
>:;" .~'"
~i\
Ij ~
;;1 ~"
q ~
~,8'
.~ .1[1
." '
'", :;:#'
l,~.~~~",,'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
March 17, 1992
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
Howard D. Koolick'ill-
BY: Finance Di rector
APPROViED FOR
AGENt ~
\~~
By:/J
ITEM
NO.
/8'.
Adopt Resolution -
Amend Bad Check Fee
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution amending the fee for bad checks.
BACKGROUND
\.'-
At its March 2nd meeting, the City Council discussed and
recommended the following policy on bad check charges:
City utility Customers
Fee of five dollars when the check is first
returned. This fee is added to the utility bill
without notifying the resident. The check is then
automatically redeposited.
If it is returned a second time, the fee is
increased to twenty dollars and added to their
utility bill again without notifying the resident.
In addition, the water, sewer and/or street light
charges will be added back to their account. No
further action for collection will be made. All
regular user charges and the bad check fee will be
collected with their next utility bill.
Non-utility Bad Checks
Fee of twenty dollars when the check is first
returned. This fee will be communicated to
individual via letter requesting either cash or
certified check for the total of the original check
and the twenty dollar fee. The City will not
attempt to redeposit the check.
COUNCIL ACTION
t'
\.
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
; .~
\J
u
/ ~
, -/'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R180-91 WHICH ESTABLISHED
SERVICE CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover has
previously adopted Resolution No. R180-9l which established a
variety of service charges for the 1992 year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover, due to
increasing costs and bank charges, has deemed it necessary to
amend the fee for bad checks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover that the bad check fee for checks received for
payment of a City utility bill shall be five dollars when the
check is not honored by the bank once and shall increase to $20.00
if the check is returned a second time.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above bad check fees shall
be automatically added to the individuals next utility bill.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED that the bad check fee for
checks not related to a utility account is set at $20.00.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 17th
day of March , 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, 'r
\..J
~'~""~"~~,."'".","
,,!;; ".
'J", '" '.
~t \
~! ~
l I
" I
\", P'
~~~-~,.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
March 17, 1992
AGENDAN~fi~B~~cussion
NO. I tern
ITEM
NO.
IfJ
Set Meeting wi th
Tree Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
APPRO~OR
AGE~LP
BY:/-
I
The Andover Tree Commission requests to meet with the City
Council to discuss and review Ordinance No. 29C, the City Tree
Ordinance and the Andover Tree Preservation Policy. The Tree
Commission would like to meet on Monday, March 23, 1992 at 7:00
p.m.
/'
'--
,- MOTION BY
l
\.- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
****************************************************************
*~************************************************************~.
~... ..
...... ..
~... ..
~... ..
~l< ~ ..
...~ ..
:: _ WHAT'S~AEPENI.NG?_ ::
~... ..
~... ..
...... ..
...... ..
~... ..
...... ..
~... ..
~... ..
~... March 17, 1992 ..
~~ ..
~... ..
...~ ..
~~ - h . ..
~... T ere ~s a meeting at 8:00 AM Saturday to inform ..
:: those ~nterested in how the National Guard ::
~~ Shutdown will effect the people stationed at ..
:: Anoka. The meeting will be held at the Anoka ::
~... Armory. ..
~... ..
~~ ..
:: - Bunker Lake Blvd/Round Lake Blvd Project without ::
~... the street between Bunker Lake Blvd. and l46th ..
:: Ave. NW will make it difficult getting access to ::
~~ the Church. It needs the cooperation of the ..
~... h h ..
~... c urc , Medical Building owners and the City. ..
:: Also, who is going to pay? ::
~~ ..
:: - Comprehensive plan revision will be at the Metro ::
~~ Council on Monday morning. ..
...~ ..
~... ..
...... - The Clerk will be out of town at the Clerk's ..
~... ..
~~ Conference on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday ..
~~ next week. ..
~... ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~... ..
"'l< ..
...... ..
~... ..
~... ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~l< ..
~~ ..
~... ..
.~... ..
"'~ ..
~... ..
~... ..
...~ ~
"'~ ..
~l< ..
...~ ..
"'~ ..
...... ..
...... ..
"'.... ... .~
...... ~
~... ..
"'... ..
~... ~
~~ ..
"'... ..
. ~l< ..
...... ..
"'...... ..
",...*************************************************************.g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~/
...-
./
Q..U
5&>1/1;-
~I (
ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT
1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
COUNCIL COpy
NAME
EQUIPMENT Sign Out
TURN OUT GEAR
UNIFORM
1. HELMET
2. COAT
3. BUNKER PANTS
4. BOOTS
5. GLOVES
6. HOOD
7. BRUSH COAT
8. FLASH LIGHT
9. SPANNER
1 . BADGE #
2. SHIRT
3. PANTS
4. TIE
5. BELT
6. JUMP SUIT
PORTABLE
#
PAGER
#
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP
I HAVE BEEN ISSUED ALL OF THE ABOVE ITEMS ON
( DATE ) AND WILL RETURN AT THE END OF MY EMPLOYMENT
WITH THE ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT.
(l t-
v -5 I~)/
::s r:;::;), 1
COUNCIL COpy
J\H0'UTES OF THE ANDOVER OFFICER MEETING ON r.fARCH 10TH ,1992
PRESENT: D. MASHUGA,J. PIERSON.. 'Jll d (~e"'("Lc'L.
JVJd~.l::.-inb, D. REITAN,/C .5TAR/<-- i:>.,.~... /oJ.. iSON
LATE: J. RICHARDSON, M. NEUSCHWANDER
ABSENT: 11-1. s <L.. i !If')
SECRETARY D.SZYPLINSKI
PERSONNEL COl\1MITTEE: R. VIERKANT FIRE MARSHALL: J. NOYES
RESCUE: J. ANDERSON
ITEM 1.)
CALLED TO ORDER: BY D MASHUGA AT 7:05PM
ITEI\l 2.)
ITEM 3.)
ITEM 4.)
APPROVAL OF FEB. 11TH I\lEETING
OPEN MIKE
( NO COl\IMENTS MADE
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE ( R. VlEKANT )
'"
STATUS ON :
RECORD SHEET OF ALL ITEMS TIL-\T ARE GIVEc'l OUT TO ALL NEW
RECRUITS. (J. PIERSON) DAVE SZYPLINSKI IS MAKING A FlNAL COPY TO
PRESENT AT THE NE."\.! MEETING.
OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING COST OF SCHOOLING OR TEST GIVEN TO
RECRUITS THAT DO NOT STAY ON. ( R. \'lERKANT) STILL WORKING
ON. NEED ADDITIONAL STATE GUIDE LINES. WILL BRING BACK INFO.
DISCUSSED KE\1N REUBADORS REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY LEAVE ABSEr-.iS.
THIS ITS...1 WILL BE BROUGlIT TO TIm GENERAL l\1EMBERSIDP FOR A VOTE
IN l\fARCH.
'"
"
TRAINING ( P. NELSON )
'"
'"
PETE GAVE OUT TIlE NEW TRAINING SCHEDULE. PLEASE NOTE CHANGES
VEIDCLE DRIVING CLASS. TIm ANDOVER FlRE DEPT NOW WILL REQUIRE
A CLASS B LICENSE TO DRIVE ANY OF TIm muCKS AFfER DEe. 31 1992.
PLEASE NOTIFY ALL FIRE FlGffrER PERSONNEL.
WORKING ON TRAINING OFF1CER JOB DESCRIPTION OUTLINE. \\lLL BRING
BACK REVISED OUTLINE AT ?o<'E"\.! MEETING.
TRAIr-.1NG OFF1CER SHALL NOW WEAR A YELLOW HELMET STATING
mAINING 0FF1 CER ON IT.
'"
"
1
ITEI\I 5.)
EMS ( J. ANDERSON)
'"
WORKING ON ,VAl' TO MAINTAIN 24 HOURS OF TRAINING FOR EMf
WORKING ON AGILITY TEST FOR RESCUE RECRUITS.
PRESENTED IN SERVICE DRlLLS FOR R.\1S
UNIFORMS HAVE BEEN ORDERED
MarION BY 1.,,-,'1E : TO HAVE BAWES MADE FOR EMS ,VITIl TIffi STAR OF
LIFE IN -ruE CENTER AREA SECONDED BY PAUL. MOTION PASSED.
EMS IS COj\lING BACK WITH IDEAS ON PROTECTIVE CLOTIIING.
PRESENTED R.vlS WORK DESCRlPTION. WILL REVIEW NEXT MEETING.
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
*
PLEASE RE!\IIND ALL PERSO]\''NEL THAT IF THERE ARE
ALREADY RESCUE PERSONNEL ON THE SCENE CONTINUE
DRIVING TO THE STATION AND RETURN ON A RESCUE VEHICLE.
WE ARE GETTING TO l\-1ANY PEOPLE DRIVING THERE O\VN
VEHICLES TO THE SCENE.
ITEl\1 6.) FIRE MARSHAL ( J NOYES
'" DISCUSSED THE FEE BEING CHARGED FOR BURN PERMITS
~'1OTION BY DALE: THE FEE CHARGED FOR PERlvIITS BE RAJSED TO $10.00.
EFFECTIVE APRlL 1ST, 1992
SECONDED BY PAUL. MO"TION PASSED.
'" PRESR."ITED HRE MARSHALL JOB DESCRlPTION. WILL COl\lE BACK \VITH
"-lORE 11'IFO.
'" 5"TILL RESEARCHING HELMET COLOR.
* )l.,V\Y 6TII JOYCE V\'1LL GIVE A PREPLAN CLASS TO THE DEPT.
ITEM 7.) DISCUSSED OFFICER DUTIES AND THE USE OF THE CHAIN OF
COMMAND.
'" C1I.AJN OF COl\/1)I.,1A,,-<U WAS PRESR."ITED AND DISCUSSED.
1\1OTION BY DAVE: THAT TIlE CHAIN OF COMMAND TIlAT WAS
PRESENTED,
WITH THE CORRECT LE1TER HEAD ON IT BE APPROVED.
SECONDED BY PAUL. MOTION PASSED.
'" DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES WAS PRESENTED. PLEASE REVIEW AND
RELAY
YOUR COMl\ffi"ITS TO JACK BEFORE THE NEA'T MEETING.
ITEM 8.) REVIEW CAPTAINS JOBS DESCRIPTIONS.
'" DISCUSSED JOB OlTTI_INE. CORRECTIONS \\-1LL BE MADE AND REVIEWED
AG.AJN AT NE."\.'T lv1EETING.
ITEM 9.) DISCUSS LIEUTENANT JOB DESCRIPTION.
* DISCUSSED JOB OUTLINE. CORRECTIONS WILL BE MADE AND REVIE\VED
AGAIN AT NE).'T l\,fEETING.
,
ITEM 10. BOB PEACH
.. OPEN DISCUSSION WITH BOB PEACH.
.. CLOSED DISCUSSION FOLLOWED. A NEW LETTER WAS DRAFTED
AND APPROVED BY ALL MEMBERS PRESENT OF THE OFFICER
COMMITTEE. ACTING CHIEF DALE MASHUGA WAS NOT PRESENT IN
THE ROOM FOR DISCUSSION OR VOTING. THIS LETTER WILL BE
PRESENTED TO BOB BY JIM PIERSON HIS ACTING CAPT AIN.
ITEM 11.) DISCUSS SECRETARIES JOB DESCRIPTION.
.. DALE WAS UNABLE TO F1ND A CURRENT OUTLINE TO WORK FRO!\1. HE
WILL TRY TO LOCATE ONE BEFORE NEXT MEETING.
ITE1\1 12.) DISCUSS STATUS ON IC VEST.
IT E 1\,1 13.) NEW BUSINESS
.. JIM WILL TAKE OF ORDERING '''RAT IS NEEDED.
..
"
DISCUSSION ON THE STRESS DEBRIEFING THAT WAS HELD
DISCUSSION ON PETE NELSONS STATION ASSIGNIVlENT.
MOTION J\.IADE BY DAVE : THAT PETE NELSON BE MOVED TO
STATION 1 FROM HIS CURRENT ASSIGNMENT AT STATION
2. SECONDED BY : MARK MOTION PASSED.
VERIFY IF ALL KEYS HAVE BEEN TURNED BY BOB.
e JI1vl \\'1L CHECK)
MARK IS WORKING ON A 5 YEAR PLAN FOR THE DEPT.
DAVE REITAN IS CHECKING ON MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR STATION 1
WATER THIEFS ARE ON HOLD. JIM IS RESEARCHING THESE VALVES
AND WILL ORDER.
JIM ASKED ABOUT ARE MISSION STATEMENT. JIM WILL CHECK
\\1TH BOB PEACH.
DISCUSSION ON LOCATION ON THE DEFEB.
STATION 1 IS PUTTING A MAP IN THE DISPATCH ROOM.
DISCUSSION ABOUT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE.
DISCUSSION ON PERSONNEL COMMITTEE CHAIR, LOADING TIME OF
PERSONNEL RECORDS ON THE COMPUTER MTD SECRETARY DUTIES
REGARDING POINTS.
COMMITTEE FORMED (JACK, DAVE, PETE, MARK, DALE)
TO CHECK INTO BOX ALARMS.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
ITEM 14.) OLD BUSINESS
NONE
ITEM 15.) l\'lEETING CLOSED AT 1l:38PM
NEXT MEETING MARCH 16TH
NE\V AGENDA ITEMS
ITEM 1.) DISCUSS CHIEF AND ASST. CHIEF JOB DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM 2.) SUGGESTIONS ON RESPONSIS TO CALLS.
THESE MINUTES ARE NOT APPROVED.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMFTED BY DAVID L. SZYPLINKSI
'l'
,
. .
.....,.. ..
'.
.... r'
" I \
t'
.-'
-~
~~.
c,c...
CCUNC1L COpy :r~//1/q)
ArMDOVERFIRE DEPARTMENT
CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
MINNESOTA 55304
1785
ANDOVER
,
.y'
",#'
.-'
.. ._-......~-_.,,_..-..,.
To:
Firefighter Bob Peach
From:
Officer Committee
subject:
Violations of AVFD Personnel Standards #4
Date:
March 10th , 1992
This letter is to inform you have been found in violation of
article 4 of the personnel standards of the Andover Fire Dept.
this is do to adverse criticism of the Andover Fire Dept. by you
to members of the Public Safety Committee and comments made at
the January 25th, 1992 business meeting. This letter constitutes
a written warning and shall remain in your file for a period of 6
months, any further violations of rules and regulation shall
result in immediate disciplinary action.
The Officers have agreed unanimously (Dale Mashuga abstained
from all voting) on the following:
Letter in on 3-11-92
Letter out on 9-11-92
This letter supersedes the letter written on Feb. 11th), 1992
I
" Q. ' t1~
.'~1,)~.J' /-"(./).L~. .
(
tlfp- Cfr.
(jewLvaX Ui3I1~ 3
. ,
I
0U
~7 fqy
3/11
COUNCIL Copy
AGENDA OF THE ANDOVER OFFICER MEETING ON MARCH 16TH ,1992
CALLED TO ORDER:
ITEM 1.) APPROVAL OF MARCH. 10TH MEETING
ITEM 2.) OPEN FORUM
ITEM 3.) PERSONNEL COMMITTEE ( R. VIEKANT )
STATUS ON :
>/< RECORD SHEET OF ALL ITEI"v1S TIL"-T ARE GIVEN OUT TO ALL r-.'EW
RECRUITS.
>/< ONIONS FOR RECOVERING COST OF SCHOOLING OR TEST GIVEN TO
RECRUITS THAT DO NOT STAY ON.
ITEM 4.) TRAINING ( P. NELSON)
>/< TRAINING OFFICER JOB DESCRIPTION OUTLINE.
ITEM 5.) EMS ( J. ANDERSON )
>/< WORKING ON \\lAY TO MAINTAIN 24 HOURS OF TRAINING FOR EMT
>/< WORKING ON AGILITY TEST FOR RESCUE RECRUITS.
>/< EMS IS COMING BACK \vlTH lDEI\S ON PROTECTIVE CLOTIIING.
>/< PRESENTED EMS WORK DESCRIPTI ON.
ITEM 6.) FIRE MARSHAL ( J NOYES)
>/< FIRE Iv1ARSHALL JOB DESCRIPTION.
>/< STILL RESEARCIDNG HELlvffiT COLOR.
. ,
,
ITEM: 7.) DISCUSSED OFFICER DUTIES AND THE USE OF THE CHAIN OF
COMMAND.
'" DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES.
ITEM 8.) REVIEW CAPTAINS JOBS DESCRIPTIONS.
ITEJ\.I 9.) DISCUSS LIEUTENANT JOB DESCRIPTION.
ITEM 10.) DISCUSS SECRETARIES JOB DESCRIPTION.
ITEl\1 11.) MARK IS WORKING ON A 5 YEAR PLAN FOR THE DEPT.]
ITEM 12.) DAVE REITAN IS CHECKING ON MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR
STATION 1
ITEM 13.) MISSION STATEMENT. (JIM)
ITEM 14.) DISCUSSION ON LOCATION ON THE DEEFEB.
ITEM 15.) DISCUSSION ON PERSONNEL COJ\.IJ\.HTTEE CHAIR, LOADING
TIME OF PERSONNEL RECORDS ON THE COMPUTER AND
SECRETARY DUTIES REGARDING POINTS.
ITEM 16.) COMMITTEE FORMED ( JACK, DAVE, PETE, MARK, DALE
TO CHECK INTO BOX ALARMS.
.4 f. ,.
ITEM 17.) DISCUSS CHIEF AND ASST. CHIEF JOB DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM 18.) SUGGESTIONS ON RESPONSES TO CALLS.
ITEl\1 19.) OLD BUSINESS
ITEM 20. NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 21.) NEXT MEETING APRIL 12TH, 1992
MEETING CLOSED AT :
DATE: March 17, 1992
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Safety Committee Minutes - February 27, 1992
Disaster Committee Minutes - February 27, 1992
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - March 5, 1992
Anoka County Sheriff's January Report
February Building Report
Letter to Andover Fire Department - March 1, 1992
Letter to Ken Orttel - March 6, 1992
Coon Creek Watershed Agenda - March 9, 1992
Lower Rum River Watershed Agenda - March 18, 1992
weybridge
You Are So Kind
Fire Marshal's Report
1992 Budget
Schedule of Bills
Feasibility Report Project 9l-27A
What's Happening
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
Office of
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612-421-4760
RECEIVEO' ~
I f EB 28 1992l
.-
CITY OF ANDOVER
MONTHLY CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPOR1
CITY OF ANDOVER
Month:
January
, 1992
This report ref lects the producti vi ty of the Andover contract
cars, 3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It. does not include activity
by Sheriff's Department cars within the City during non-contract'
hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within
the City during contract hours.
-0>.
Arrests: Traffic
44
Radio Calls
406
DWI
o
Complaints
293
,]"
Arrests: Felony
2
.'Medicals
7
. _'J"....__- . ....
--,.... -" .
- ~-::-.:. -~:;..~~-.~
G.M.
2
P. I.' Acciden-t:s- . 2---------- -------
-. ".',.'.
.;,
Misdemeanor
18
P.D. Accidents 9
",-",,-,,--,;,,-
Arrests: Warrant
4
Domestics 14
II ...~-
Papers Served
o
House Checks
67
Warnings
13
Business Checks 326
Aids: Public
35
Other Agencies 43
TOTAL MILES PATROLLED:
9,998
.J
Anoka
Captain Len Christ
County Sheriff's Department
Patrol Division
-!.....~~
. -
. . ~,-::".-....,-~.;;~~
..... - -:. €'_~~::~.:~~~-.i ~-
-7-
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
COUNCIL COpy
Andover Fire Department
Ci ty Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Sir: .
.~
March 1, 1992
"
~ ~ 3/111/ qY
On January 25, 1992 it was necessary for me to call 911.
The fire department volunteers were quick to respond and
offered their assistance. Their presence was much appreciat-
ed. ~.
Thank you for all your help.
s;:elY~~lu
Barry 0 Douglas
.....~..""'1-~~~.~- ...........,.I2t.,,~.,'#.a-..,....... .~..;a.,..
n"l1tJ'r:l~
l~n~n NW Vnllev Dr.
Andover, MN 55304
Andover Fire ~epartment
City Hall
1685 Cros3town Blvd.
Andover. MN 55304
- .""'<- -.,.~~
-
--
-
-
..-
~
City of "
ElK
c c,.) /'1 \qfj
River
March 6, 1992
Mayor Kenneth Orttel
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover,!1N 55301
Dear Mayor Orttel:
This is a letter of support for the Elk River Jaycees, who I
understand will be assisting in organizing an Andover Jaycees
Chapter.
The Elk River Jaycees have been very good for the citizens of Elk
River. They sponsor numerous community events yearly that are very
well attended by our citizens; both young and old. Some of the
events are the Miss Elk River Scholarship Pageant, Easter Egg Hunt,
Halloween Parade, Toys for Tots, and an Ice Fishing Contest, just
to name a few.
I strongly encourage you to give your support to the Elk River
Jaycees in this effort. If you should have any questions, give me
a call.
R:2spe tfully, . -/?
.V(;:
.---------
Mayor Jim Tralle
City of Elk River
JT/kma
720 Dodge Avenue N.W., Elk River, Minnesota 55330 (612) 441-7420
"'
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
March 9, 1992
7:30 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6. Approve Bills
7. Andover Water Plan
8. District Cooperators
PERMIT ITEMS
9. Winslow Hills 2nd Add.
10. Fields Private Cleaning of Ditch 57
11. Sand Creek Estates West
DISCUSSION ITEMS
12. State Water Retention Law-Required Ponding
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
13. Receive Staff Report
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
1-: 'C C
3117!r~
"
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
February 24, 1992
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on February 24, 1992 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams, Bob Boyum.
Staff :
Tim Kelly, Kathy Tingelstad, Ed Mathiesen.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:31 PM
2. Approval of the Agenda: Moved by williams, seconded by
Hentges. Motion-carried with five yeas _(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and williams) and no nays.
3. Open Mike: Wayne Da'/ids addressed the Board of Managers. He
lives along Coon Creek in Andover and was upset about trees
removed from the maintenance easement on his property. He had
planned to flag them but didn't think the crew would be at his
property so soon.
Boyum met with him briefly after he left the meeting.
Kelly gave the Board details about the Davids' tree cutting
incident. Mathiesen sug~ested that staff keep a record of the
facts and keep a file en this as a complaint. Kelly will keep the
80ard appraised of this issue.
~el'y st3ted that it was not anticipated that the work crews
would be moving that quickly. However, the home owners were
notified to flag their trees. The Davids' trees that were cut
were growing over the ditch. Kelly will remind the Coon RapidS
residents at the February 25 open house to flag their trees
ir.1rr.ediately.
Policy Items
~" ^p~roval of February 10, 1992 Minutes: Haved by Richmond,
seconded by Williams with the following correction noted: On page
4 under the Ditch 57 permit ite~, correc~ the typo of wench to
winch. Hoticn carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
5. ^nd~Yer Lecal Water Plan: Y.elly outlined several specific
concer~s about this plan. He~~~s noted that the changes should be
considered friendly ones. Hcn~ges s~id that we appreciate their
plan and feel that it will also help the Watershed District.
Rich~ond wo~dered if this was considered the public hearing for
the pl~n. Y.elly said that it was not because there is no
statutory reGuire~ent to 'have a public hearing on these plans."
Moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond to turn the plan back to
staff to discuss concerns with Andover staff, noting that the
80ard found that the plan does not meet the legal requirement for
content. Hotion carried with five yeas (8oyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
'-'
..,
Page 2. Coon C~ee~ Watershed District - February 24, 1992
Permit Items
6. Hidden Creek East: Hathiesen presented the permit review for
this 22 acre area. He said that it drains to wetlands on and
adjacent to the site and that the District has had an enforcement
prOblem in the past with the applicant repairing silt fence in a
prompt manner.
Hemmes asked a question relating to legislation about the rate
control of more than one acre of impervious land. Y.elly said that
he will call 8wSR to clarify this.
The staff recommendation to approve contingent upon receipt of
the erosion escrow amount and that the applicant contact HPCA for
an NPOES permit requirements was moved by williams. Seconded by
Hentges. Motion carried with-five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and williams) and no nays.
7. Waiver: Schult: Heme Construction: ~elly presented bacKgrcun~
on ~his item, stating that the application is for recording worK
adjacent to wetlands. Kelly said that this type of work was not
covered in the regulations, so a waiver would be appropriate.
Kelly thought that this should be brought to the Board's
at~ention. Hemmes said th~t the 80ard should allow Kelly the
option of doing a limited amount of administrative waivers,
without having to take the items to the Board.
Richmond ~oved to waive the permit requirements. Seconded by
w;11ia~s. Hotion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Rich~ond, and Williams) and no nays.
Discuzs;on Items
B. 1992 ^~~inistration of Social Security:- Kelly--gave the
background en this issue, stating that the District was informed
it needed to have FICA taken cut of Han~gers' per diem at the
State convention in December.
Hoved by Richmond, seconded by Williams to have Anoka County
Pa,roll issue Har.ager's per diem checks each Quarter, with FICA
taken out. In addition, it was recommended to have Kelly attenc a
workshop on Harch 20 concerning IRS reporting requirements for
wa~ershed districts. Hotion carried with five yeas (Hemmes,
Boyum, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Informational Items
9. Project Upda~e: ~ell, s~ated the Ditch 57 tree removal project
(92-2), work has prc3ressed quickly with only a few unfortuna~e
incidents.
.
Y.elly said th3t the District has figured out a way to avoid the
n3ture trail near Crooked Lake School by worki"9 on the east bank
of the creek. Richmond recommended that the District do an
after-the-fact permit to help with accountability in this area
and to establish proper documentation on this issue.
Carlson h3s sus~ended his permit work on Ditch 57 in Andover, but
didn't go all the way to the school property.
pase 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - February 24, 1992
In the Ehrlinson Nature Center project (91-3) about 90% of the
tree removal should be done by the end of February. The rest of
it may be done in the summer. Kelly said that this project will
ceme in over budget at about $6,000 because there was about twice
as many trees to be removed than expected.
The trailer ~ark tree removal project (92-1) is approximately 75%
completed and should come in at or below previous estimates.
Hathiesen posed the issue of spr~ying to control woody brush
along ditch 57, as is done in other areas. He encouraged the
Board to consider this issue in the future.
No action w~e needed on this item.
10. Audit RFQ and Bids: Y.elly included a draft let~er requesting
for bids to do t~e 199G.and 1991 audits. The let~er has not sone
cut yet. He~mes as~ed if the require~ents listed in the letter
were standard and wc~'d a~y of the~ drive the price up. Kelly
said the audit spes1f~c3ticns \~ere ~orrc\'lcd from the
R~msey/Washingtcn ~e~rc wa~8rshed District and felt that they
were standard re~uirements.
No action was needed on this item.
New Business
11. Kelly updated t~e Board on various activities. He stated that
Hernmes and Richmc~d were scheduled as a short item on the
February 25 Caon RapidS City Council Heeting agenda to update the
Council on the District.
The open house for the Ceon RapidS section of the Ditch 57
cleanins project is scheduled fer February 25. Kelly said th3~
there was a f~ir a~c~nt of inte~est i~ the Cooperater Agreements
-at the recent Andover cpe~ house.
The Beard briefly discussed ~n article in the Star Tribune
concerni~g a lane use decision in Eagan--$761 ,000 for 13 acres.
Y.elly will set a coOy of the actual court report. This is just a
remlnder ab~ut the c~re ~eedcd in setting regulations.
There was a brief discussion about the wetland program and
compensation for losses ~y landowners.
The meet-in
seco~ded "b
Hentges, R
adjourned at e:~5 PM on a motion by
will~a~s. ~-tction carried ....,ith five
chmc~d. and willi3ms} and no nays.
Richmond,
yeas (Hemmes.
Reg1n3lc A. Hemmes, Pre51cent
/'
.
I\1EETING DATE:
AGENDA :-''U:\illER:
FILE :-'u7rmER:
ITE:\l:
com.j CREEK WATEHSHED DISTlUcr
I'EIC\llT lU~yTEW
March !.J, 19!J2
(0
2-1-92-20
r- ,") . /),,(.11 CL-t:/Jd,tVC- _ () I tt....tf 5 7
rlr;.LDs r~"IArc
FISCAL r.'rlPACf:
POLICY ThlPACf:
N/A
Action
LOCATION:
Ditch 57 and Coon Creek Drive north 3,000 feet.
PCRPOSE:
APPLIC.-\J.'<T:
APPLICABILITY:
EXHIBITS:
CONSIDEIL\TIO:"'S:
FI:-"'DI:-;CS:
Dred~~ 3nJ removai ~1l trees ~lncl debr:s frcr':1 Ditch ;37.
Ed Fields and Sons, Inc.
15421 Round L1ke 130ule'larci
Andover, :-'l~ 5530.1
1.12 . Land Cse and Soli Characteristic~, anti 1.15 - Control of
Erosion ;:md Seciimer:taticn from Draina.;e.
Permit Application and iilin.; fee. dated and received 2-28-92.
:-'lap show:r:.; section of ditch to be maintained.
L~tter or appro...a! [,.om property owner, K~nny S!yzuk.
'The Oistric::s Ditch 57 plan shows that excavation at the time
or the drawings is approximately 1.5-3.0'
\Vetlancls appearing on the ~ational Wetland Inventory are
found th,.ough the entiretJ. of the project.
In the clisc:..:ssion bet.....een Enr;ineer :-'latthiesen and Tim Fell
or the CaE Regubtory I3ranch, it .....as determined that as 10n1,;
as excavated mate,.ial ',,'as not placed in the wetland, no Corps
pe:-mit would be reCj:..:ired. .
The lOO-year :100<1 elevation from the FE:-'L\ FkO<1 Insur:mce
Study ne:!r Coon Cre'c~ Dri\',~ is 567 and ne:!r the upstream
project. croll is Sti8. .
,\ revie..'.. ot the pro\;e:-ties :IITectecl show that Quality 131ack Dirt
is :hc Q\\,;th'; on tbe property to the C3St on the noru1 side of Ditch
57 ar~ not Ed Field., and Suns, Inc.. This SilOUld be resolved.
.1'
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTIller
PERMIT REVIEW
FILE NUMBER: 2.1-92-9 (Continued)
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with the following stipulations:
1. Written approval be obtained from all property owners
where equipment will cross their property.
2. Dredged material be placed outside of any wetland area.
3. Dredged material be placed outside of any floodplain area
or above elevation 867 near Coon Creek Drive or 868 at the
upstream project limit.
4. Any disturbed banks be seeded immediately upon
completion of the project.
5. The District receive erosion escrow amount of $500.
r.IEETING DATE:-.--
AGENDA #
FILE NO.:
ITEM:
COON CREEK WATE..T\SIIED DISTIller
PERMrr REVIEW
'--March 9, 1992
9
.l.-I-U_-f!
Winslow Hills
Second Edition
FISCAL IMPACT:
POLICY Ii\IPACT:
N/A
Action
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
APPLICA1"1T:
APPLICAI3ILITY:
EXHInITS:
CONSIDEHATIO:'-iS:
FI:'-iDINGS:
Avocet Street N.\V. and 150th Lane N.W.
Andover, Minnesota
Development of 60 single family units on
29.0 acres
Winslow 1I0lasek
Holnsek Properties, Inc.
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, ~Iinnesot.:l 5530.1
1.12 land use and soil characteristics, 1.15 control of erosion and
situation from drainage.
Project schecule dated February 19, 1992
Preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan by
Loucks and ,\';sociates, Inc. dated February 12, 1992.
Preliminary plat, Winslow Hills second edition by Hy-Land
Surveying', Inc. revised February .1, 1992.
None
This pinject drains through the Cr(:ekview Crossinr~ Pond and
into Ditch 20.
Gradinl~ is ,,'Teater than :5 acres, therefore applicant should pursue
a ",PDS permit.
The NWI wetlands show an eascment around the wetlands.
I
The outlet for the wetlands hasn't becn constructed.
A permit has not becn submittcd.
Erosion escrow of $1,950.
~.
RECOMMENDATIONS: .
Table pending receipt of information from City of Andover
regarding the connected drainage system to hold up this water to
Ditch 20.
Certification from the City of Andover that the outlet for the
drainage pond at the intersection of Zinna Street and 150th Lane
N.W. will not be constructed or isn't needed at this time.
. Permit application
Sediment protection around catch basins and inlets until the base
course of asphalt is placed.
-4'. /...
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
Request for Board Action
MEETING DATE: March 9, 1992
AGENDA NUMBER: 7
Fl LE t'IUMBER: - - =:-j~-i=9 f~ 1 - -------
ITEM: Andover Water Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted
POLICY IMPACT: Action
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------.--------------------------------------------
B..\CKGROU!'lD
At the Febrwary 2~, 1992 meeting the Beard found that the present
form of the Andover water plan does not meet the legislative
requirements far ccnte:1t of a local ~'ater plan under MS 1038.235.
Staff met with Andover staff and discussed four general needs of
the plan;
i. Plan cc~plete~ess.
? Maxi~um ~ischars~ rates rram subwatersheds In the
r;rll
.... , '<oj J .
W::.t-o,... ,..nro:)lit-'J ;CCIIO,="
"...... ... '-'. ""1............,... J . '-' '-'.... '-' '-' .
4. Wetland manasement ~~ithirl the city.
St3.ff also
and-report
clrr'r'll ;o~
..........1-",..... ,'-'....
siven to
city__s_taff '.'.'ith c_a~__ie~ of the staff
the Board of Hanagers February 2<1.
re',I 1 8'0"/
I SSUES/CONCE:Rt!S
1. P e 'I i e '..~~~ r i c q : ~~ S 1 0:; B . 2 3 5 sub d " c i t est hat the 0 i s t r i c t has
60 days to complete its re'/iewcf a local plan. If the District
fails to co~~lete its revie~' \~ithin that time frame the plan
shall be de9~~ed apprc'/9d, u~lless an extension is agreed to by th'e
loc::l
f""'1f""\I,c.. rnmor"'\ t-
::;I..... . .~, . .,.............
The ~ i s t r i c t r e c e i \' e d t. h ~ /..~; j 8 'I C r p 1 an ...l a:l u a r '/ 1 6, 1 99 2 .
days e~ds l1arch 16.
The 60
RECOHHEND/\ T ION
Adept the followir19 resolution.
. .
RESOLUTION 92-06
EXTENDING THE REVIEW PERIOD OF THE ANDOVER WATER PLAN
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1038 require comprehensive water
planning and management at the watershed and local levels, and
WHEREAS, The Coon Creek Watershed has a comprehensive plan
approved by the Ninnesota Beard of Water and Soil Resources on
Julj 27, 1988, and
WHEREAS, The City o~ Andover has drafted a local water management
pla~ u!~de~ Hin~esa~~ S:2tU~~S 1029.235 a~d submitted that plan to
the Coc~ Creek Wate~shed Oistrict fer review, and
WHEREAS, The Ccon Creek Watershed Oistrict recei'!ed that plan en
January 16, 1992 and re'!ie~/ed it at the February 24 Board
meeting, and
WHEREAS, At the February 2!! 80ard meeting the Board of Managers
found that the plan \'/3S net complete relative to the ccnte!~t
require~ents in Minnesota Statute 1038.235 subdivision 2 and
could not be approved, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Stat~te 1035.235 subdi'lisicn 3 ~equl~es the
Watershed District to act on a lecal ~/ater manage~ent plan ~'/ithin
60 days or recei~t, unless an 90tensicGujs a.gre~d__~t.~q_,_ and
WHEREAS, Coon Creek W3tershed Dis~rict Staff met ~/ith City of
^nda'le~ staff en M3rch 3, 1992 to re'liew the draft plan and the
District's comments and at that time ^nco'ler staff agreed to
modify the plan and requested an extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED THAT, The Coon Creek Watershed
.District, at the request of the city, is e:<tending there'liew
periad far the Andover Local W3ter t~anagement Plan to al1c\~ the
City ti~e ~0 m2~e the ~eeded changes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, ln the absence of the requested
cha:1ges to the loc~l water m~n3gement pla~l ttle plan submitted to
the W3.tershGd District Jan~~r,/ 16, 1992 is not appro'/ed.
.
2015 1ST AVE., ANOKA MN 55303
10 C~C. 3/;19z-
_....
: E f"EI VED
~trAAR 9 l!l91 I
--
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZA
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY
r;ITY OF ANDOVER
MEET!NG NOTICE
Wednesday, ~~rch 18, 1992 - 8:30 a.m. - Committee Room, Anoka City Hall
AGENDA
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Minutes of Previous Meetings
D.
Treasurer's Report
E. Payment of Bills
F. Report of Officers
G. Consideration of Communications
H. Pending Projects/Permit Reviews
1. Ramsey's Fourth Quarter 1991 Report
I. Old Business
1. Water Quality Records/Maintenance - Jankowski
2. Newsletter Articles Due - Weaver/Jankowski
3. Consideration of LRRWMO Permit Application
Procedural Policy
4. Consideration of Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
J. New Business
1. Establish a Review Board for Interim Wetland Reviews
2. Establish a List of Review Board Personnel
K. Adjournment
ATTENDANCE:
WMO Membe rs
--R'fc-mf-
MAR 9 1992 D
-
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGAN AT:amV OF ANDOVER
FEBRUARY 12, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8:30
a.m. in the Committee Room of Anoka City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Scott Erickson, Steve
Jankowski, and John Weaver (left at 9:25 a.m.).
Also present were Anoka alternate Ray Schultz and Andover
Assistant City Engineer Todd Haas.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Erickson,
MEMBER SHALL RETAIN THE SAME OFFICE AS WAS HELD
SCHRANTZ, CHAIRMAN: JANKOWSKI, VICE-CHAIRMAN:
SECRETARY: AND ERICKSON, TREASURER.
that EACH
IN 1991:
WEAVER,
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES -
Motion was made by Schrantz, seconded by Erickson, to APPROVE
THE JANUARY 15, 1992, r~ETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
TREASURER'S REPORT
Erickson presented the Treasurer's Report for the period
ending January 31, 1992, showing a money market checking
account balance of $10.00: interest bearing savings account
balance of $3,103.79: and a certificate of deposit account
balance of $6,000.00: for a total current balance of
$9,113.79.
Erickson reported the 1992 membership dues notices for the
first half of this fiscal year was sent out January 31, 1992.
Some cities have reportedly made payment already, but the
checks have not yet been deposited.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to ACCEPT
THE TREASURER'S REPORT AS PRESENTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
--c:; .iinutes
1--92
.
-,.-...-..
\
I
I
:PAYM1:~ ;-::' -.OF BILLS
':1':'" _-~ n~
-.--.----..--
Jankowski, a member, along with Weaver, of the Bill Review
Committee,-presented. a bill- .from the League _of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust for insurance coverage for the period
January 31, 1992, through January 31, 1993, in the amount of
$2,291.00. The insurance agent, T. C. Field and Company,
also provided a copy of the renewal policy for LRRWMO review
and its files.
Weaver reiterated this organization should let its legisla-
tors know we feel this body should not have to pay for
insurance. coverage for WMO activities when-we are all city
employees and presently insured through our individual
municipalities. Schrantz concurred there should be a better
way of protecting this board, but also recognized the
League's problems with insuring the various types of
exposure.
Jankowski also presented a bill from Barr Engineering,
invoice #10598-390, for professional services during the
period December 1, 1991, through December 28, 1991, totaling
$304.84.
Upon a brief discussion of the Consulting Engineer'S project
review for both the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and
the LRRWMO, Schrantz indicated he is satisfied with the way
the review process is being coriductednow. -- He -felt this
board needs the Consulting Engineer's response before this
board reviews it in order to expedite the matter.
Schultz provided, for the board's review, a billing, for
which the City of Anoka is presently responsible, for the
removal of dead head trees from the top of the Anoka Dam. He
felt this $450 per hour expense was not entirely the City of
Anoka's problem. In addition, the DNRreportedly refused the
city's request for a burning permit for this debris.
Jankowski noted that these dead heads could be coming from
quite a distance up stream and out of the LRRWMO boundaries.
Schultz concurred but felt this is not just the City of
Anoka's problem: some day the dam will have to be replaced.
He queried whether the LRRWMO will assist with expenses in
that event. Schrantz suggested that.Schultz check around and
study the issue further, and perhaps the board could discuss'
it again at a later date.
!
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1992
Page 3
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
PAYMENT OF THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA .CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
PREMIUM INSURANCE BILLING OF $2, 291.00 AS WELL AS THE BARR
ENGINEERING BILLING OF $304.84, AS PRESENTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
REPORT OF OFFICERS
Resolution Designating the official Depository
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIRST BANKS AS THE LOWER RUM
RIVER WATERSHED .MANJI_GEMENT ORGANIZATION'S OFFICIAL
DEPOSITORY.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
LRRWMO Office Area Problems
The Administrative Secretary, Mava Mikkonen, explained that
while the Anoka City Engineer's secretary, Nancy Frank, has
in the past assisted with the opening of LRRWMO mail and
graciously put up with the sometimes inconvenient utilization
of her office space in order that Mikkonen might conduct
LRRWMO business activities, Ms. Frank has indicated she now
prefers to be totally distanced from LRRWMO business. In
addition, because of limited office space, Ms. Frank would
also prefer the LRRWMO files and secretarial activities to be
located elsewhere. Mikkonen reported inquiring within Anoka
City Hall about other available office space and seemed to
have "stirred up a hornet's nest", for whatever reason.
Having provided this background information, Mikkonen then
turned it over to the board to decide as to how to proceed.
Schultz indicated there is a conference roam adjacent his
offices which contains a computer terminal in which Mikkonen
might work. He also offered to check into the availability
of a four-drawer filing cabinet for LRR~iMO use to be kept in
said conference roam. As for the handling of the mail,
Mikkonen indicated she could go into City Hall every three or
four days, with the board's approval, to check the mail.
Schultz offered to screen LRRWMO mail himself and either
contact Mikkonen, should any of it need immediate action, or
would place it in the LRRWMO files' in-basket to be dealt
with by the Administrative Secretary in a timely manner.
Mikkonen indicated she was agreeable to this proposed
arrangement.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1992..
Page 4
'CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS
Schrantz noted the receipt of two permit reviews from the
Consulting Engineer:. .#92-01, a water quality permit.for the
Anoka Vocational Technical College and #91-14, a water
quality permit for a City of Ramsey development project.
#92-01: Schultz provided the Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld,
Jarvis, Gardner, Inc. (BRW) prepared site plans for the Anoka
Technical College's building addition. He indicated the
school will have to install a ponding area, as shown on the
plans provided. Said pond will be located on the school's
right-of-way. A skimming devise will also be installed.
Schultz indicated Barr Engineering has been working with the
school right along during the project's development.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schrantz, to
APPROVE PERMIT APPLICATION #92-01, ANOKA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL
COLLEGE, WITH NO FURTHER CONTINGENCIES.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
#91-14: Members considered the Consulting Engineer's review
response relative to application #91-14 for the City of
Ramsey, the final result being it was the opinion of the
Consulting Engineer that this plan does not meet the require-
ments of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organiza-
tion. Additional information provided from Skallman was that
in his telephone conversation with Tom Hovey, Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the DNR will require
some sort of wetland protection at all outlets requiring a
DNR permit. Jankowski referenced the January 3, 1992, letter
to himself from Tom Hovey, Area HydrOlogist for the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, requesting changes to the
City of Ramsey's proposal, seeking clarifications on some
items, and pointing out some discrepancies on others.
Jankowski stated initially Ramsey's permit requested approval
for the construction of all nine outlots. He reported
Skallman indicated he had no information on outfalls W3, W4
and P3. Jankowski stated all those outfalls will be con-
structed in a later portion of the phasing. He indicated at
this time he is withdrawing Ramsey's request for approval of
these three outfalls. : '.
Jankowski went on to address each of the other outfalls and
the related problems.
'.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1992
Page 5
J'1l: ~ = Drainageyelocity.. is twelve feet per second. WMO
standards are a maximum of elight feet--=per second. . . n Jankowski-
stated Ramsey proposes to modify the outfall by adding
another structure, a surge basin, which will be resubmitted
to Barr Engineering ...forSka1Iman' s review and consideration.
However, Jankowski reported Barr Engineering found those to
be not very effective. He argued the surge basin's design
criteria for velocities can be as high as thirty feet per
second utilizing rip rap. While he feels the WMO's maximum
eight feet per second is arbitrary, Ramsey is willing to go
through the process again.
Jankowski indicated another comment from the DNR is that
although the discharge fram outfall WI goes into Chestnut
Pond, the DNR has required same sort of sedimentation control
be provided at the outlet control to the wetland. Ramsey has
reportedly proposed to create a sumped out area downstream
with rip rap, allowing for Cleaning. Although this is not a
WMO plan requirement, Ramsey is required to satisfy the DNR.
Jankowski asked for LRRWMO approval of this plan based on
LRRWMO requirements and let the City of Ramsey deal with the
DNR.
W6: Jankowski indicated a similar Objection was made for
this outfall. While he originally proposed a nine per cent
slope, resulting in a velocity of fourteen feet per second,
he is now proposing the same type of structure be installed
here as is proposed_fo~ WI.
WS: Jankowski stated Skallman refers to W6 when he indicates
the proposed development is not in compliance with all LRRWMO
standards: however, he believes Skallman means WS.
P1: Jankowski stated this outfall discharges into a Class B
water body. He indicated the drainage area for the discharge
point is small enough and there is sufficient area there that
they can put in a sedimentation basin with a skimmer on the
end and will, therefore, comply with LRRWMO criteria.
Jankowski indicated Ramsey will resubmit plans for Pl.
:.
P2: Jankowski stated this outfall drains the largest area in
the subdivision, approximately forty-two acres. He proposes
a pond be constructed within the park area to handle much of
the discharge. Ramsey reportedly plans to install a skimmer
on the outfall, and drainage will go into the adjacent
protected wetland via discharge P2. This process will
collect water and discharge it directly into the bay without
providing for sedimentation. Jankowski asked for considera-
tion to allow this variance due to the fact that the prelim-
inary plans for this subdivision was approved prior to the
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1992
Page 6 .
LRRWMO having its plan in place. In.addition,Jankowski
indicated he thinks it is reasonable to do this because this
particular area is completely covered with rooted vegetation
and is not an open water situation. The majority of the
wetland,. ...particularly .. this..bay, is covered. .wi th rooted
vegetation. Jankowski indicated he feels it will be a
natural place for the sediment to come out in any event.
Schrantz queried how Ramsey plans to clean it. Jankowski
stated Ramsey could construct a berm across there and clean
it in the winter. However, he stated this berm construction
would have very little effect. Schrantz concurred, stating
the weeds would do it. Jankowski stated if they want Ramsey
to clean this, it would be possible to do so without
constructing an additional basin in there~ that is what you
have now. .
Jankowski confirmed drainage into this property would
primarily be from adjacent homes, driveways and the streets.
There are two catch basins with approximately fifteen inch
pipe by the homes which could have sumps in them. Others
would drain directly into the pipe. Jankowski stated, in
looking at this, Ramsey could double the length of the pipe
between the given location and the pond and back, but
questioned whether such action would be worth the additional
cost.
Jankowski indicated he is requesting LRRWMO approval,
contingent upon the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer's approval of
the surge basins and the ponding for outfall Pl. He stated
Ramsey would still need a variance for the concept of direct
discharge for a portion of the drainage area at P2.
Jankowski stated it would be possible to put catch basins in
from the residential lots, but it would involve an extra
structure.
Schultz.acknowledged the concern for the residential use of
fertilizers and run off from the roadway. With any high
water this would migrate quickly.
Upon discussion of the Consulting Engineer's review,
Jankowski stated he is sure Skallman will not approve this.
Erickson suggested perhaps Ramsey put in catch basins with
sump catch basins. Jankowski indicated Ramsey could comply
with that. with that, Erickson felt perhaps the project
would then comply with standards. Jankowski stated the catch
basins would not catch everything. However, Jankowski
indicated he would be willing to discuss with Skallman
whether sumps would comply with sediment control
requirements.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1~92
Page 7
Jankowski requested LRRWMO approval for the four outfall
projects, contingent upon complying with the Consulting
Engineers recommendations, leaving out P2. Schrantz felt
such a request would bealright.if .Jankowski.canwork it out
with Skallman. Jankowski indicated if he was successful in
working this out with Skallman, he would bring P2 back to the
LRRWMO board for a final decision.
Jankowski stated development will start soon, but storm sewer
construction would be the last thing to go in.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schrantz, to APPROVE
THE CITY OF RAMSEY OUTFALL PROJECTS W6, W5, AND PI, SUBJECT
TO THE LRRWMO CONSULTING ENGINEER'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
Jankowski stated the City
permit fee, all of which
some.
of Ramsey has submitted its
they will probably use and
$500
then
Upon discussion of the Consulting Engineer's responsibil-
ities, Schultz stated the LRRWMO should not be paying the
ConSUlting Engineer to design Ramsey's system for them.
Erickson concurred, but added the ConSUlting Engineer should
be clear on what requirements the plan does not meet.
Jankowski acknOWledged Ramsey probably did not supply the
proper information for the ConSUlting Engineer to review
either, what with this being the first major project the City
of Ramsey has had to pass through the LRRWMO.
Jankowski stated the City of
sary portions of the plans.
approval contingent upon the
Ramsey will redesign the neces-
He acknowledged the board's
Consulting Engineer's review.
VOTE: 4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
(Weaver left
privileges. )
at 9:25
a.m.
Schultz . assumed
voting
Schrantz acknowledged a February 4, 1992, letter from John C.
Anderson, Wetlands Data, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, request-
ing the LRRWMO consider him for employment for on-site
wetlands delineation and mapping. The Administrative
Secretary was directed to file this information for future
reference.
Schrantz noted the receipt of a January 29, 1992, memorandum
from Jim Birkholz, Assistant Director of the Minnesota Board
of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), indicating that effective
February 1, 1992, BWSR is Shifting work area boundaries to
FeD:
Page .3
"'"
various boarc _ -- :-}sentatives and field hydrologists. Bruce
Sandstrom is -~:' .'ce; :ing Regional Supervisor for the LRRWMO.
Schrantz provided a copy of
ing-himself -and Bruce Perry
respectively, to the LRRWMO.
a resolution officially appoint-
as member and alternate member,
Jankowski reported BWSR will head the Interim Program of
Wetland Regulation, referencing the January 14, 1992, memo-
randum from Greg Larson, Administrator-Wetland Management
Section, BWSR. John Anderson will be one of the BWSR
committee members. Jankowski added Pat Rudolph, Anoka Soil
arid Water Conservation District, has indicated they will
provide consulting services, as might Barr Engineering.
Members discussed board attendance at upcoming seminars to
discuss the Interim Program of Wetland Regulation.
Motion was made by Schrantz, seconded by Schultz, to
AUTHORIZE STEVE JANKOWSKI'S ATTENDANCE AT ONE OF THE UPCOMING
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT INTERIM PROGRAM OF
WETLAND REGULATION SEMINARS, WITH REGISTRATION COSTS TO BE
PAID BY THE LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION.
Jankowski indicated he plans to attend the February 21, 1992,
seminar in Brooklyn Park.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS
Member Cities' Quarterly Reports
Schrantz and Erickson provided fourth quarter 1991 project
reports.
OLD BUSINESS
Water Quality Records/Maintenance
Jankowski indicated he has still not gone to Barr Engineering
to discuss their LRRWMO records/maintenance files. The board
had previOUSly concurred the LRRWMO central files should be
similar to that maintained by Barr Engineering for this
organization.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
February 12, 1992
Page 9
Newsletter Articles
Neither Weaver nor Jankowski had his newsletter articles
available for insertion in municipal newsletters.
Approval of Interim Wetland Regulations
Schrantz noted the January 14, 1992, memorandum from Greg
Larson, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Wetland
Management Section, along with attachment relating to the
interim guidelines for wetland regulations. Erickson
indicated it was his belief these regulations are mandatory.
Schrantz stated he would have preferred to" use Coon Creek's
fifteen page proposed guidelines.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schultz, to
ACKNOWLEDGE THE BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES ADMINISTRA-
TIVE GUIDELINES: INTERIM PROGRAM OF WETLAND REGULATION.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Outfall on Mississippi River/Waste Management
Jankowski indicated the Mississippi River is still not frozen
over, especially at the outfall area of the Waste Management
project; and he can not, therefore, monitor safety concerns
relating to winter snowmobile activities on the river.
Anoka County Ditch Inventory
At the January 1992 regular meeting, members were provided a
copy of the Anoka County Ditch Inventory and were asked to
review it and make comment on any concerns. Schrantz
indicated he had only a couple of comments on the ditches
from Andover's prospective. Schultz stated the only ditch
affected in the City of Anoka was #43. He added, however,
whether the ditch is there or not does not make a difference
to the City of Anoka because Anoka has accommodated the
runoff by a storm sewer. Runoff in this area does not run
into Anoka. Erickson indicated he has not thoroughly
reviewed this document yet, but noted there are a few Coon
Rapids ditches included. He stated he will check it out more
thoroughly.
Jankowski suggested the WMO's take over the ditches; it
should be one of our responsibilities. Erickson and Schultz
strongly disagreed with that position. Schultz added that
maintenance of those ditches includes considerable liability,
resulting in the need to increase insurance coverage; an
action this board can not afford. Jankowski concurred,
LR,c:.
Feb.:
Page
Mee-
3-ry 1::'
10
~s
stating if 'Ne
responsibility
general fund.
can not assess then he does not want the
~f the ditches~ we can not do this out of the
Jankowski volunteered to write a rough draft response
Anoka County Ditch Inventory for the county and
available by the March 1, 1992, deadline.
on the
make it
NEW BUSINESS
Consideration of LRRWMO Permit Application Procedural Policy
Mikkonen indicated after considerable discussion at the
January meeting about what the permitting procedure should
be, she drafted a pOlicy/operating procedure on this issue
for the board's consideration. Mr. Haas indicated he has a
few concerns and would submit his proposed changes in
writing. Schrantz stated any member who wishes to propose
changes should submit them to the Administrative Secretary
prior to the March meeting, at which time this pOlicy will
again be .considered.
Consideration of Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
Haas addressed Andover's storm drainage plan, indicating
there will be a few minor changes. Andover reportedly
provides an annual report to the Coon Creek Watershed.
Jankowski recommended Andover's StorrnDrainage Plan be sent
to the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer for his review and comment.
Mr. Haas indicated he would send Skallman a copy.
Soil and Water Conservation District Seminar
This itemwas previously discussed and action taken during
this meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to ADJOURN
THE MEETING.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Time of adjournment: 10:25 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
tZ.~~~
Mava Mikkonen
Administrative Secretary
POLICY/OPERATING PROCEDURE
.~tEllJ-f-
f MAR 9 19921D
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER .
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANI
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS
DESCRIPTION:
LRRWMO PERMIT PROCEDURE
DIRECTIVE: When processing an LRRWMO permit application,
the following procedure will be enforced:
Applicant obtains a LRRWMO permit application from the
project's City Engineer, and the permit application fee is
submitted along with the appropriate project plans for
review.
-- The City Engineer is responsible for the check, permit
application form, and backup information being sent to the
LRRWMO office at Anoka City Hall where the Deputy Treasurer
will process the check and number the permit application.
A copy of said check and backup information will be
provided to LRRWMO in-coming mail, currently at Anoka City
Hall, Engineering Department, for proper. mailing distribution
to board members.
The
copy of
is sent
City Engineer is
the check, permit
to the Consulting
also responsible for seeing that a
application, and backup information
Engineer for the project review.
Upon approval/consideration of the permit application, the
LRRWMO board shall direct the Administrative Secretary to
contact the applicant, informing said applicant of the
board's final decision relative to the permit application.
DATE OF APPROVAL:
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN:
.-
ITEr ETIIE n
fl(MAR 919927U
,-
C!TY OF" ANDOVER
February 19, 1992
Mr. Jon Olson
Anoka County
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
RE: Anoka County Public Ditch Inventory
Dear Jon:
The Lower Rum River Water Management Organization has reviewed the ditch inventory
worksheet which you prepared. The information compiled ,,,,,ill be useful to the WMO and we look
forward to receiving the final document when it becomes available.
With reference to your desired input from us on the future management authority for the ditches,
the WMO would offer the following position. We believe the ditch systems represent an element
which is integral to the organization's mission of preserving and protecting \vater resources.
Therefore, we would concur with the cO:lcept that ultimately concrol over these ditches should rest
with the Water Management Organizations.
However, as you suggested. serious concerns at the present time regarding the ability of the
WMO's to responsibly handle the ditches. The W110's are no levy authority and supporting local
governments are constrained with levy limits. Some of our member local governments have home
rule charters which may prevent them from exercising special assessment authority. In summary.
the WMO cannot assume responsibility for these ditches until we have been granted the statutory
authority to ensure our financial ability to oversee the management of the ditches responsibly.
Sincerely.
Steven J. Jankowski, P.E.
Vice-Chairman
SJJ:ccr
)
/
"
;~
!
I
)(
{\~
~
~
<t~
/ ~~
II L~
r:-/? I~ '
\ ~(;I ,
h~__ _______ct__7 t ~
~Jbl~-
ffrD --
'- r-----
--"'"
-'c
(~,,~:=J
C' " \.
- Q
&~?
o .-
~ l7'
~~r
~
~-
~
'\
\-
~
~
~
~ "-C
fr'
~.
<0
i::::..
~/
0-
c::>
~c:
-
..::..
--:;;;:
~
~
~ .'
...
~
"
~
'"
~
,
;; t,.-, ,
.,
,
::,
;
';
I
,.."
..,
..,
'~,'
")
I
',"")
I
',~
'""\
..." ,
'""\ '.
I"'
I"
""
,..0,
,,-
, >
,',
I,")
I
I
"
, ,
I
,-\
:~
,
,
....
I "
'"'
, ~.
,.,
-.
>, ,
""
-,
I '~YU
,I (TV;
~OUNCIL COpy
) . f 7
:l-, Ir - 'w ~ ~ p---'-~
1~ .sf~~ J..t~~
0cn..t... co--. YVJ ~ ~ ~ 1-~
S~ ()~
U~ 7PT~ ,2-.29- ::1:".,..:,
m Cc..'J -&::tti:... -.!-o~--Ictt.1 t4'"f,'-'tL I Vo So' / c... f- ~/rJ
1v1 c..-.:J1 r:...-p ~ ,~ 'VH~"'" d2..~1-
Lv~~ ~
Art-L ~ ;;2~
~ -..{'-* '-'-{;~ ~ ~ c-0~#--,-,
~~~~~
~~ ..........p 'J.-vl "...:)
W~ <>--"-- ~ ~~
~--r_-;O ~1m.-~ ~ f2~~3S-r
Ul.-o-.____ -"'-J~ ~ f6.....-'Y~ ~
r,vQ:"'; --::; ~~ h-......-- ~
'Mc:J ~~~~"- -:f-~
LJ~~ ~ -:t~
Vv7o.J~~~~
W~ 0""""'-- ~~
~- -<--p' ~~J ~ ~
~ is-J-JO l.-v1~
~~~
;)., - Ilf-
.1.-ICf-
C)- ~)D-;t
d - ;1 <( -
;2 - J- L( +-0 3 - 7 --.2 ~
F' /fl.;' i'1_ /l :J / /7 If 9
... ''''Y/?JbI-9c..5 ~
/1 e~l7~ 7'
~~.o .~ ,..~ c.a..tu-
/i~
f
t
~./\.-...........,~ '~-;z.....-"L- /\.-!l-~ c..a.",.-Loz.---
LJ ~'o. 0---... ~~t., ~
c.J <."-"'h. UV'o.. ~,z.....{..t'~
~--V~~ ~ -~'1...0 '7-f R~
~) G~ ~ ~~ 5 C'~...&...vu....
~.A^-t-p ~-~...:: ~~
,
3.--.v+ ~ 'VvJ c c. 5 ~~_ L.. ~:......
. I
I
f
l
I
I
, ,........~...~"..JIIII'Ilt"""1',__...w_~.......~ ~ ....~._>!'_,
.~-- .
,--~
-
"
.,,..-----....-......~
.
.1 - .2 s-- -
Ie:
i~ ,.
r~
,r
iE
If:
f'
r:
[?)
,
t:
, ".~
(f~
f""l
f~ t
~
1
~
,1
L'
.",~ .... ~""''''''.~ ~.""'_r~,..______
1).- 1 b
~-:27
12 -:>Y
tvl~ ~ P-~-~
.s-J-..~ ~~.JZ p_~~t-rt-C~
(f~,~ /]~~-z~ /t..~ c-t"te.f.(.?--
,:{ ~ '.;PJ....;J..5 c.~_
W --,J V ~ Ca.v.- ~
4J mA\ """'- ~.......A- ~~
-:/-~fi~ ~ /3Y7r..J ~--(Jd'
~~ ~tl-~~ VLo,/",,- S' ck~.
W~ ----f ~---z,"-f--c-v-l-
Wcr,..A.... ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ -6.vu ~~'1c-<u.-.....
f.J~~ ~~
w~ -~ /LJ.<., ~
A Lc- ~
~~ ~ ~v..- ~J...Gt--
Jc.&-I,- ~"L P-~ ~ 1-~'Y 1~-CL.,^--
To.-lt\ -.h; ~ ~ ~ h~ <ffS~~
---~.7-'0 VI :51- WI ~ / ~
~ :rD'S~~
~ ----r ~
~.A ~ -w,~ut~~.~
y~~-e.....~~~~~
I.J ~ """- ~ ~~D6 ,(.& ~
,.
Do u~ ~ ~ Jt?~
~~;;-~~~
~~D~~~
~~ ~ Oo..-r ~ ~
I~ ~+o 7~
/.) "',- -<-1A,~ ....... - ~
l.'-' --:-''-'!' r" ~
f-<....-<../L ---? ~<
+~ ~~~(,C; -:J-~ 15 ~
~~ ~ ~ c<.dt--
.... ~
J
-
'1"
~
. .
,
;~
~:,I~
{ ,
.
~
I~;
: m';
,
I~;
17:
ir.r~
f".t;
1.Jr~
! ",
':+,
'A"'
, ,t...I
1-,-",
,
I",.~
I
;-"'f~
I .~
~,
i ..;,
~, ,
.
;) - d- q - s.,..J:- ~ j.c"t.- ~ ~ ~ '1'jcJ
~ I~c..-V-~, ~~/tJ.('''I/.Ll,.
sJ.....--pA ~ I:S<,;>
./~,~ ~- 1.-.t-~1 ~-.~"'~:lrO~'!'
J - ).. -t.~~ A /-'---:;h-'-,-v o.>>~-f.- /~~.. {2.." ,-,...~I-
/Yvr:~ --LJ.hJ,- (J ~ ,~_~~~tu 'Jp ko..~~
./J.d (i><'-~"'L I.-<./~ ~"1 -tf'fJ"l" _<.-..~<U.<-,,-<~ (<..7"....1
4J ~'l o$V'\.. ~'-"-'+- ~~
~~ --{~ ~~-z.. Ce<.-O .2 P.~-~~L
t.J k-o ~ ~--V.~~,
4..J c:n....i."~,, ~~
~_ _ _ _ /7" 4-..... i?
Do D<>-<t c~ o~l:::-~ ,'t' -0~
SvI-~ -jv:-~ c.~,- p~
~1~C~~L~~f?~
~ ~ (~5-. V2el L~
IJ~ ~,~ ~.t7};:;:-t.~~
~~~~
~~ ~ ~ ~lt?-
. c~ ~ a.{~ ~f-
c~ ,~ ..L-6~.....J- <'--,Kif?
c~e ,<; cA:-~'-fl6 ~.~~~&J~
C4eA.-f C~ ~.6-e'-f-'-'{- ~~
,S.- ~ - -::;-~ ~~~
1,) rJI.-l, CJY-\. ~--fj~) 7-v1tL~{
~ 7..J.r. +~ ~ c.a->> ~ ~ HeLL!
~ --ow (2Ly~ +v .+~___
Ci'~ ~ A ILL G..JLM.IJ~t.[~
~ Ot.,....l/L A IZ c ~ l'lQcvU~+/1lu5)!--~-<V->-
~~) ~1vlJ!&{J1A.~~.
CLvCt~ -1- ~'-v/4..v') &--0 {v;;;b:-$:r:-;(;:>v..-
/7' . '"' c JI . ~--p- " (,J {) ,
l- 4-", lv-V~ ~ VvC:) ~~ I --kVl,.---l~~J~,
c. e-J.. ( ~~ J Ho-v&^"'-.....-u-~ 'l'A_\.L,-,-t'-~':t-
i,:'~
I
.,....:;~
...,.;;~
'-"4
I~
...-;~
~~
""';:!t.
""';;l\
~~
.-.:1
-,,:I
-i!!
-~
-"1
-"1
-,
,
-,
-"'~
-..
..
:l
j1
-I
~ 1_ "'~_'T '~-'~"'---II'!'_i- ........ ___
t
~~~~~
~~ ~~O-O~C~
lJ t1"A "'" ~ 4~L....- (J"-'-1"'~ .
s.vt ~ Dc""'1 C~""'- ~~
[j ~ OV\. -+-- ~ ~ C/~ ~~
~.....,t? .~ ~ c-~
:::r ~ ~"^'. I ;- 31- "'r
3-L/ Art<:.-~
p....~1.-- ~ ~/.
~ ~ -5~ (~A!3.
, I
3. s-- ~.-4 It<:.- ;/~
o...--'A- ~ .~~
W ~ ~ ~-..J. -6~
~/L~;/' I~ I
k--f- ~ D c"'1 ~ ~-1'~'-
~~~~~
..3 - t. {'~~ .~~_ ~ CA'U!f..~
uJ~~ ~ ~.
~ 46 ~~ ~--r:
]-7- ~ ~ -6-<''-- 4~ C~
e
~
;j1
-:i'
"'~~.~_~~,~_.....J:..___ _.
,
j
>
,i;
-
--
.,.r
,,..,
J
I
r-t
. I
U
i
r"1
L...i
i
r"1
J
!
1
u
../;jCA1CP'~'"'' ;<:".
~'1 '~'
o '"
. ...~.
'.J1 ;....
~ Ii
~, r
\.. I"
'Zir;;Ci'p"",;: ,.:.,,:~-5;//
,.,
, L..J
I ,
I .....
, : I
, 'U
\0
,
"
CITY
OF
DO R
'J
'1
u
t,
t
U
i '0
,
I
,
1M'
J
1
u
o
Q 1992 Sumtnary Budget
n
'J
G
: 0
I
'l
!
U
J
1
.J
1
u
n
J
r'1
J
1
L1
1
...J
1
Ll
..,
...J
r
;
L..J
1
L..J
1
u
r'l
J
r,
I
Ll
J
J
IT
J
~
I
l.1
CA.
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
BUDGET TRANSMITTAL LETTER
February 27, 1992
Honorable Mayor and city Council
and Residents of the City of Andover:
Submitted herewith is the 1992 adopted budget for the City of
Andover. The budget represents the blueprint of where the
City intends to go financially and programatically during
1992.
This document, the Summary Budget, is intended to summarize,
for the Mayor, City Council, residents and other interested
persons, how the City of Andover has allocated its resources
for 1992, and the principles and forces which guided that
allocation.
The Summary Budget is divided into the these sections:
* Executive Summary
* Introduction to the City of Andover
* 1992 Goals and Objectives
* Operating Budgets
* Tax Levy
* Prospects for the Future
* Appendix
The introduction section provides general background
information about the City, its structure and services. The
operating budgets section includes information about the
revenues, expenditures and important variables affecting the
1992 budget. The tax levy section provides information
relating to the certified tax levy for 1992. The second to
last section attempts to anticipate future items and issues
which will have an affect on the city. The appendix contains
a variety of financial and tax levy information.
,...,
J
1
LJ
r"l
I
LJ
The City also prepares a summary budget which
information about those items included in the
section of this document. Copies of this budget
upon request.
contains more
introductory
are available
,...,
I Questions or comments from readers are welcomed and should be
LJ directed to the Finance Director.
""1
I
U
'""1
L.i
1
LJ
,...,
I
U
""1
I
LJ
,...,
I
LJ
1
LJ
,...,
I
LJ
'l
u
"1
,
LJ
,...,
I
LJ
,...,
I
U
,...,
J
'l
LJ
""1
I j
, 1
u
,....,
u
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'1
u
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
r-:
,
INTRODUCTION TO THE CITY OF ANDOVER
Background
Budget preparation
Services provided
L.I
n
u
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
,....,
OPERATING BUDGETS
Revenues
Expenditures
General Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Debt Service Funds
Revenues
Expenditures
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund
Water Enterprise Fund
Revenues
Expenses
Sewer Enterprise Fund
Revenues
Expenses
u
n
I
u
r-,
I
LJ
~
u
'l
,
L.J
~
u
TAX LEVY
changes in Taxes Levied from 1991 to 1992
Calculation of Taxes
Property Tax Changes for 1992
Allocation of Property Taxes Levied
Comparison with Other Cities
'1
LJ
'1
u
PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE
Building Trends
Relationship with State of Minnesota
Debt
....,
L.J
APPENDIX
General Fund Revenue by Source
General Fund Expenditures by Department
Tax Levy Information-Last Ten Fiscal Years
Comparison of 1991 and 1992 Tax Levy Data:
Estimated Market Value
Calculation of City Tax Base
Components of Certified Tax Levy
Reconciliation of Taxes Spread
by County
Calculation of Tax Capacity Rate
Calculation of Taxes Spread by County
..,
u
,....,
I
U
,....,
,
u
n
i
u
r-,
I
LJ
Page
1
4
4
5
6
8
9
10
10
12
14
15
16
17
17
17
18
19
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
23
23
23
23
24
26
27
29
30
30
30
30
31
31
,...,
u
rl
u
~
u
n
I
U
,...,
I
U
~
U
r;
u
~
u
r'l
LJ
,...,
u
r1
LJ
r)
,
u
n
,
u
n
LJ
,...,
u
"
,
U
n
LJ
,...,
u
.,
U
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary provides an overview of this Summary
Budget document. More detailed information can be found in
the information that follows as well as the more detailed
budget which is available upon request.
The City of Andover operates under guidelines established in
Minnesota State Law. These guidelines govern all operations
of the City including the organization structure, the budget
process and tax levy authority to name a few. Under these
guidelines, the City provides the usual services associated
with a City and finances these services through a variety of
means.
Adopted operating budgets for 1992 are as follows:
Permanent Water &
Debt Improvement Sewer
General Service Revolving Enterprise
Fund Funds Fund Funds
Revenues:
Taxes $ 1,113,714 $ 898,949
Licenses/Permits 259,298
Intergovernmental 644,326 254,797
Charges for Services 80,200 $ 602,986
Fines and Forfeitures 40,000
Special Assessments 1,000 1,667,570 $ 119,000 14,500
Miscellaneous 82,700 581,650 55,000 14,000
Bond Proceeds 1,500,000
Transfers from
Other Funds 93,300 37,630
Total Revenue $ 2,314,538 $ 4,940,596 $ 174,000 $ 631,446
Expenditures:
General Government $ 608,307 $ 36,798
Public Safety 850,791 45,700
Public Works 436,462
Parks & Recreation 230,428
Recycling 36,811
Other Financing Uses 151,739
Water/Sewer Operations $ 631,446
Debt Service $ 3,031,048
Total Expenditures $ 2,314,538 $ 3,031,048 $ 82,498 $ 631,446
1
~
LJ
r,
w
~
~J
~
LJ
~
LJ
r,
LJ
n
LJ
r,
LJ
~
LJ
r1
I
U
r;
u
r,
I
U
~
I
LJ
r,
~
~
w
~
u
~
u
~
I
LJ
!
u
General Fund Budget
The General Fund is
operations of the
reflects an increase
used to account for the day to day
City of Andover. The General Fund budget
of $110,336 over the 1991 revised budget.
The additional revenues required to maintain a balanced budget
include an increase in the tax levy ($63,988), the inclusion
of a budget for Community Development Block Grant Funds
($47,723) and increases in some local revenue sources totaling
$61,988, which is offset by decreases in other local sources
of $63,363.
Additional expenditures in the General Fund include:
Increased costs for new
volunteer firefighters
and new station operations
Inclusion of a budget for Community
Development Block Grant Funds
Increased costs in the police
contract with Anoka County
Estimated election costs
Increased costs in the assessor's
contract with Anoka County
Increased number of traffic signals
$51,663
47,723
15,150
13,586
6,789
5,100
The above are partially offset by eliminating the sealcoating
program and reducing the cracksealing program.
Debt Service Funds
Debt Service Funds are used to account for the resources
accumulated to make annual principal and interest payments on
debt issued by the City. The Debt Service Fund budgets
reflect a large decrease in activity compared to prior years
resulting from large prepayments of special assessments in
previous years and smaller scheduled bond maturities during
1992.
Expenditures are primarily the payment of bond principal
interest and are subject to little fluctuation. Revenues
this fund are primarily special assessment payments which
vary greatly from year to year.
and
in
can
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund
This fund accumulates
various improvements
resources for
and acquisition
the
of
construction
equipment.
of
The
2
r,
u
r,
u
~
u
~
u
~
u
~
LJ
~
LJ
r,
LJ
~
LJ
~
I
U
~
,
LJ
r,
u
~
,
u
r1
,
I
U
r1
U
r1
I
U
r1
I
I
U
~
u
~
I
II
revenues in this fund result from assessments remaining on
four bond issues which were paid-off in 1990 and interest
earnings. The expenditures for 1992 include the acquisition
of minor election equipment, the replacement of minor and fire
department equipment, the repair of a fire truck and minor
building improvements.
Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds
These funds account for the revenues and expenses associated
with the operation of the municipal water and sanitary sewer
systems. Revenues are primarily from user fees charged to the
residents connected to the water and sewer systems. User
rates are set by City Council. The 1992 water rate increased
one cent to 95 cents per thousand gallons. The 1992 sewer
rate remains at $36 per quarter.
Tax Levy
Minnesota state law governs the amounts and purposes for which
property taxes can be levied. Under the provisions of state
law, the City levies property taxes to finance operations and
repay the principal and interest on debt issued by the City.
The City's 1992 certified tax levy totals $1,936,649; an
increase of $455,579 over the 1991 levy. The vast majority of
this increase ($415,407) relates to the Fire Bonds which were
approved by voters in 1990. In addition, due to changes in
state law, the City's tax base over which the taxes will be
spread has decreased slightly. The combination of these two
factors results in the City's tax capacity rate increasing
from 10.925% in 1991 to 17.424% in 1992.
The City of Andover is only one entity levying property taxes.
Anoka County and the school districts serving the City of
Andover also levy property taxes. In fact, the City of
Andover receives slightly more than 16% of each property tax
dollar. These other taxing entities receive the majority of
each properties tax.
Prospects for the Future
It is anticipated that the City will continue to see the
growth in residential construction that has characterized the
City in the past. However, it is unclear how this growth may
affect future budgets and tax levies since the State of
Minnesota has, over the last three years, made numerous
decisions that have had a major impact on City finances.
3
r,
I
LJ
~
J
~
,
LJ
~
LJ
~
I
LJ
~
i
~
~
LJ
r,
LJ
r,
u
r,
I
U
~
,
U
n
J
~
LJ
r,
I
LJ
r,
U
~
,
LJ
~
U
~
U
r,
;
u
INTRODUCTION TO THE CITY OF ANDOVER
Background
The city of Andover was incorporated on November 12, 1974.
Previously known as Grow Township, the City is located in
Central Anoka County approximately 25 miles north of the Twin
Cities of Minneapolis and st. Paul.
The City operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government
as defined in the state of Minnesota statutes. The City
Council, composed of an elected mayor and four elected
councilmembers, exercise legislative authority and determine
all matters of policy. The City Council which will be serving
during 1992 is as follows:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Donald Jacobson, Councilmember
John (Jack) McKelvey, Councilmember
Marjorie Perry, Councilmember
Todd Smith, Councilmember
The City Council, all serving in a part-time capacity, appoint
a City Administrator, various department heads and employees
to carry out the day-to-day operations of the City.
Budget Preparation
The City maintains 37 accounting funds, each of which operates
as a separate accounting entity with its own assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenditures. Annual budgets are
adopted for the following funds:
* General Fund
* Debt Service Funds
* Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund
* Enterprise Funds
Annual budgets are not adopt~d for Capital project Funds since
each project within a fund has its own, multi-year budget.
The City budgets on a calendar year basis in accordance with a
variety of state laws. One of these laws, known as truth in
taxation, requires the City to meet the following deadlines:
4
r,
u
r,
~
r,
u
* Prior to September 1st - The City must adopt a proposed
tax levy and budget.
* Between November 15th and December 20th - The City must
hold a public hearing on the proposed tax levy and
budget and adopt a final tax levy and budget. The
final tax levy cannot exceed the preliminary tax
levy.
* Prior to December 28th The City must Certify to the
County the amount of the final tax levy.
Failure to meet these deadlines results in the City being held
to the amount of taxes levied in the prior year.
~
I
LJ
1
LJ
~
u
r1
In order to meet the deadlines listed above, the budget
process begins in late spring as department heads begin
planning for the upcoming year. In late June or early July,
the City Council is presented a preliminary budget, which is
refined and amended until its adoption prior to September 1st.
u
r,
,
u
Budgets for
year. Since
sewer user
completed in
laws.
the enterprise funds are completed later in the
these funds are financed totally by water and
fees and receive no tax revenue, they can be
late fall without affecting the truth in taxation
r,
u
r, Services Provided
,
LJ
~
,
U
The City of Andover is the provider of the normal services
associated with a city. These services can be broken down
into the following areas:
*
General government consisting
property assessment, building
elections.
of administration,
administration, and
~
,
u
r,
LJ
* Public safety consisting of police and fire protection,
civil defense maintenance, animal control and
protective inspections.
~
LJ
* Public works consisting of street maintenance, snow and
ice removal, street sign maintenance, storm sewer
maintenance and weed control.
r,
* Park and Recreation consisting of park maintenance and
development.
LJ
1
u
* other services including recycling administration.
J
* Water and sewer service to the southern third of the
City.
~
u
~
J
5
,...,
I.
L.J
'l
L1
,...,
[
LJ
While the city provides these services, it is common for the
City to contract with Anoka County or a third party if such an
arrangement is cost effective while still providing the
desired level of service. Areas such as property assessment,
police protection and animal control are contracted for such a
reason.
'1
I
U
,...,
LJ
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ti
I
LJ
During the
the budget,
1992:
budget process, the City Council, upon review of
adopted the following goals and objectives for
,...,
Goal #1 - Maintain the financial health of the City of
Andove r .
LJ
,.,
LJ
'1
u
,...,
tJ
,.,
I
U
Objectives
1. Maintain General Fund fund balance, as well as all
other fund balances, as required by the Fund Balance
Policy adopted by City Council on February 19, 1991.
2.
Promote the use of tax
assessment debt financing
residential development.
increment and special
to encourage commercial and
3.
Determine a funding source for the
cover future costs of employee
retirements and begin funding these
severance fund to
resignations and
costs in 1993.
,., Goal #2 - Provide efficient and high quality maintenance of
J public infrastructure.
Objectives
,.,
u
'1
I
U
,.,
u
'1
U
'1
U
n
u
,.,
[
U
1.
Provide patching, repair and grading of roadways to
prevent deterioration and extend the street's life as
a part of normal maintenance.
2.
Provide
nature,
service
sealcoating, which is mostly cosmetic in
to those roads where residents request this
and are willing to be assessed for the cost.
3. Remove snow and clear ice, with the use of City staff
and equipment only, to ensure the roadways are
properly maintained and driveable.
4.
Acquire additional equipment considered necessary
the Public Works Superintendent to maintain
repair infrastructure on a regular basis.
by
and
6
,..,
I
U
....,
L1
,.,
LJ
,..,
J
,..,
LJ
,..,
u
'l
u
,..,
u
,..,
LJ
,...,
,
LJ
,..,
I
U
,..,
u
,..,
u
,..,
u
,...,
u
....,
u
,..,
I
U
r'1
u
,...,
J
Goal #3 - Provide for the health and safety of the citizens
of the City of Andover
Objectives
1. Provide 32 hours of police coverage through the Anoka
County Sheriff's Office.
2. Provide fire protection and rescue service through the
Andover volunteer fire department and rescue squad
and encourage residents to become volunteers by
providing training, a stipend and contributions to a
pension plan.
3. Fund costs incurred for Andover
participate in the DARE program.
students to
4. Ensure residents and businesses a safe place to live
or work by providing building inspections and plan
review for all construction in the City of Andover.
Goal # 5 -
Provide and
recreational
residents.
maintain a
areas for the
variety of
enjoyment
parks and
of Andover
Objectives
1.
Develop Kelsey-Round Lake Park as a regional
outlined in the plan prepared by the City,
the use of federal grants and local funds.
park, as
through
2. Develop and improve neighborhood parks as recommended
by the Park and Recreation Commission.
3. Maintain parks and recreation areas to provide safe
and enjoyable areas for residents.
4. Replace worn out equipment, as considered necessary by
the Public Works Superintendent, required to maintain
City parks.
Goal #6 - Operate the City in accordance with all applicable
state and federal legislation.
Objectives
1. Implement and maintain comparable worth relationships
amongst employees.
7
~
,
u
~
u
~
,
LJ
~
I
LJ
~
LJ
~
,
LJ
~
LJ
~
LJ
r1
LJ
r1
I
U
~
I
U
1
u
r1
u
~
I
U
r1
LJ
~
,
u
~
~J
~
u
J
2. Conduct improvement projects in accordance with state
statute section 429.
3. provide resources necessary to comply with a variety
of reporting, publication and operational laws.
Goal #7 - provide the residents of Andover with high quality
service.
Objectives
1. Hire, develop and retain competent and professional
staff.
2. Use tax dollars to support only those operations that
do not unduly benefit private property or specific
groups. Services or expenditures incurred that do
not benefit the entire City, should be funded through
user fees.
3. provide information of interest to residents through
the use of the newsletter, cable television, the
official newspaper and other means available.
These goals and objectives will provide the basis
decisionmaking during upcoming year.
for
OPERATING BUDGETS
Revenues
The City's major revenue sources include special assessments,
interest earnings, license and permit fees, tax levies, a
variety of state aids and utility user fees. The allowable
use and amount of each type of revenue is prescribed and
limited as follows:
* Special assessments are used for the payment of debt
for which the assessments are pledged, except as
noted below. Assessments are levied against property
benefitted by an improvement such as street construc-
tion, water and sewer installation and storm drainage
construction. Prior to levying an assessment, the
affected property owners are notified of the
potential assessment to allow them to comment on the
improvement.
Minor assessments are levied against properties where
the City must expend funds to clean up or treat a
8
~
i
U
~
J
~
,
LJ
~
u
~
,
LJ
r,
LJ
~
U
r,
LJ
r,
U
r,
J
~
I
U
J
~
U
1
u
~
I
LJ
r,
u
r,
u
r,
LJ
r,
u
health or safety problem. Costs assessed in this
manner include weed control and garbage removal.
* Tax levies are used for both operations and debt
payment based on the purpose for which the taxes were
levied. Minnesota state statutes limit the amount of
taxes that can be levied for operations. They also
limit the amount that can be levied for debt service
without an voter approval prior to issuing debt.
* State aids are also used for both operations and debt
payment dependent on the type of aid and the
allowable uses under state law. The City receives
several aids which are used to reduce the property
taxes levied including homestead and agricultural aid
and local government aid. State highway aid is
dedicated to pay debt used to improve major roadways
within the City as well as construct and maintain
these roadways.
* License and permit fees are used for operations and are
charged to the individuals applying for such items. .
* Interest earnings are allocated to each fund based on
its cash position during the year. The City pools
cash balances from all funds and invests them to the
extent available in various investments authorized by
state statute. Interest is allocated periodically
based on each funds participation in the pool.
* Utility User Fees are paid by residents who are
connected to the City's water and sanitary sewer
systems. These fees are used to finance expenses
relating to the operation of the water and sanitary
sewer systems.
The City receives revenue from other minor sources including
fines, charges for services and refunds and reimbursements.
Expenditures
The City expends resources to provide the services mentioned
earlier as well as to pay outstanding debt and to construct
various improvements. Expenditures are made for payment for
personal services, supplies, contracted services, repairs and
maintenance, capital acquisitions and construction and the
payment of principal and interest on debt.
9
,...,
;
u
,...,
Lj
1
LJ
GENERAL FUND
r"1
The General Fund is used to account for those revenues and
expenditures associated with the regular day to day operations
of the city as well as those activities that cannot be
accounted for in another fund. It is the most complex fund as
well as the fund with the most activity.
'l
u
u
Revenues
,...,
u
The General Fund receives the majority of its revenue from
property tax levies, state aids and licenses and permits. The
following is a summary of revenues within the General Fund:
'1
u
'1
u
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Taxes $ 712,017 $ 911, 255 $1,072,643 $1,113,714
Licenses/Permits 259,803 212,793 223,710 259,298
Intergovernmental 659,330 616,722 592,199 644,326
Charges for
Services 58,956 75,962 72,350 80,200
Fines 51,614 46,650 59,000 40,000
Interest Earnings 30,015 28,147 30,000 54,600
Other 43,691 41,913 34,300 29,100
Transfers from
Other Funds 70,545 188,318 120,000 93,300
Total $1,885,251 $2,121,760 $2,204,202 $2,314,538
n
L..J
,...,
L..J
'l
I
U
'l
I
L..J
,...,
I
u
As the above shows, the 1992 adopted budget represents a
$110,336 increase over the amended 1991 budget. This increase
results from an increase in the tax levy as well as an in-
crease in local revenue sources. The Appendix includes a more
detailed listing of revenues by sources.
'1
u
'l
u
The following summarizes the major components of the increase:
Increase in Tax Levy
$63,988
,..,
u
This increase represents the reduction in local
government aid from the 1991 for which the City
can levy taxes. Under the 1991 tax bill, this
is the only increase allowed in the levy for
'l
L.J
'l
U
'1
I
II
10
~
J
~
I
~
~
u
operations. Prior to the 1991 state legislative
session, state law allowed for a three percent
inflation increase plus an increase based on
growth. Both these factors were removed for 1992.
~
~
~
u
Inclusion of Community Development Block Grant $47,723
The City receives federal funds through this
program. Previous budgets have not included
equal amounts for revenues expenditures. Since
the expenditure budget reflects an increase of
$47,723 for CDBG expenditures, there is no net
effect on the budget.
~
,
u
~
Increase in Building Related Fees
$32,813
u
The City has increased a variety of building
related fees. These fees are charged when
buildings are built, remodeled or improved.
The increases make the City's fee schedule
comparable to neighboring cities.
Establishment of Investment Administration Fee
for all City Funds
$24,600
~
u
~
LJ
~
The City invests all idle cash to the extent
available. The General Fund pays all costs
associated with investing. The investment
administrative fee, which amounts to two percent
of each funds interest earnings, is designed to
compensate the General Fund for costs incurred
relating to investment activity.
,
u
~
U
~
U
Increase in Various Fees
$4,575
rl
Fees for items such as special assessment
searches, copies of longer ordinances, and
liquor licenses have been increased to better
reflect the costs to perform the required
services.
u
~
u
Decrease in Estimated Court Fines
($19,000)
rl
,
The estimate for fines charged by the County
Court has been decreased from the 1991 estimate
to reflect a more conservative estimate based
on actual 1991 fines .
u
~
,
LJ
~
U
r,
u
~
I
U
11
,...,
L.J
,..,
,
L.J
....,
I
L.J
Decrease in Transfer from the Administrative Trust
Fund
($26,700)
,...,
L.J
The city maintains an Administrative Trust
Fund which is funded through assessments for
administrative costs on new construction
projects. The Trust fund annually transfers
monies to the General Fund based on assessment
payments. The estimated amount has decreased
due to a two-year phase-in of a change in the
method of accounting for this fund which
ended in 1991.
,...,
L.J
'1
I
L.J
'1
u
Expenditures
The General Fund expends monies for public safety, public
works, administration, park maintenance and development and
other areas associated with the daily operation of the City.
The following is a summary of the expenditures within the
General Fund:
'1
U
,..,
L.J
,...,
LJ
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
General Government $ 645,436 $ 593,778 $ 582,814 $ 609,307
Public Safety 705,415 754,907 811,658 850,791
Public Works 314,928 336,214 456,043 436,462
Parks & Recreation 218,562 261,456 219,897 229,428
Recycling 20,116 39,567 37,129 36,811
Other 97,892 143,878 53,117 95,667
Contingency -0- -0- 43,544 56,072
Total $2,002,349 $2,129,800 $2,204,202 $2,314,538
,...,
I
U
,...,
I
U
,...,
U
,...,
u
,.,
u
The 1992 adopted budget represents a $110,336 increase over
the amended 1991 budget. The major components of this
increase are described below.
...,
I
U
Increase in Fire Station Operations
$19,510
,...,
I
L.J
During 1991, the City maintained one fire station
while building two new stations. The 1992 budget
reflects the additional costs for items such as
utilities, insurance and general operating costs
for two additional stations.
'I
LJ
,.,
U
12
~
~
~
,
u
r,
I
U
~
u
r,
I
U
1
u
~
u
~
u
~
~
r,
I
U
~
J
~
u
r,
I
U
r,
u
"
J
"
,
LJ
~
,
u
"
u
~
u
Increase is Number of Firefighters
$32,153
During the mid-1980's through 1990, the fire
department was authorized to operate with up to
35 volunteer firefighters. Based on report
prepared for the City establishing the City's
fire fighting needs, the City Council authorized
the fire department to operate with up to 50
members. The 1992 budget is the first year that
the department will operate with a full 50 members.
Inclusion of Community Development Block Grant
$47,723
The City receives federal funds through this
program. Previous budgets have not included
equal amounts of revenues or expenditures.
Since the revenue budget reflects an increase
of $47,723 for CDSG revenue, there is no net
effect on the budget.
Estimated Costs of 1992 Election
$13,586
Since the City is required to hold elections
in even numbered years only, the 1991 budget
included no costs for elections. Minor costs
were incurred to elect a new county commissioner,
however, Anoka County has reimbursed the City
for these costs. The estimate for 1992 is higher
than past years, since the City will be required
to hold a presidential primary in April along
with the regular primary and general elections
in the fall.
Increase in Police Contract
$15,150
The City contracts with Anoka County for 32
hours of police coverage per day. The County
increased the contract for such service by 3.84%
for 1992.
Increase in Assessor's Contract
$6,789
The City contracts with Anoka County for
assessing services. The annual cost is based
on the number of each type of property times
a specified rates. The increase results from
both an increase in rates and numbers of
properties.
13
~
u
~
J
~
,
u
1
u
~
LJ
~
LJ
~
~
~
u
~
I
U
~
i
U
~
J
~
~
1
u
~
u
r,
u
'l
u
~
J
~
u
~
I
U
Increase in Number of Traffic Signals
$5,100
During late 1990 and 1991, the City Council
approved several joint powers agreements for
the installation and operation of traffic
signals at major intersections. These
agreements call for the City to pay the
operating costs of the signals.
Elimination of Seal coating and Reduction of
Cracksealing
The City has done little or no seal coating
for the last several years since it is
primarily cosmetic in nature and does not
prolong the life of the road. Crack sealing
is being reduced to the point that only the
worst areas will be cracksealed.
($31,200)
A summary of expenditures by department can be found in the
Appendix.
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Debt Service Funds are used to account for the resources
accumulated to make annual principal and interest payments on
debt issued by the City. The City currently maintains 21 debt
service funds, however, budgets are only prepared for 19 of
these funds. The two unbudgeted funds do not have debt
directly tied to them at this time, therefore, no expenditures
are anticipated.
The City, as of December 31, 1991 has the following types and
amounts of bonded debt outstanding:
S ecial Assessment Bonds are issued to finance
var~ous ~mprovements an will be repaid primarily
from special assessments levied against the properties
benefitting from the improvements.
Amount outstanding as of December 31, 1991 - $18,315,000
General Obligation Bonds are issued to finance
improvements benefitting the City as a whole and
will be repaid from taxes levied against all real
property within the City. Currently, the only
issue of this type are the Fire Station Bonds issued
in 1991.
Amount outstanding as of December 31, 1991 - $2,500,000
14
'l
u
'l
LJ
r'1
I
LJ
J
r'1
I
u
r;
Ll
r;
I
U
r;
u
1
Li
J
r'1
J
1
u
'1
u
J
1
LI
'l
I
U
r'1
J
r'1
J
r'1
J
state Aid Bonds are issued to finance the construc-
tIon, improvement or repair of state-aid streets
within the City. These bonds will be repaid from
aids received from the state designated for payment
of this debt.
Amount outstanding as of December 31, 1991 - $510,000.
Tax Increment Bonds are issued for redevelopment
projects and are financed by the additional tax
revenue, known as tax increment, resulting from the
increased taxable value of the redeveloped properties.
Amount outstanding as of December 31, 1991 - $1,015,000.
Certificates of Indebtedness are issued to finance
the purchase of equipment. This type of debt will
be repaid from taxes levied against all real property
within the City and transfers from other funds.
Amount outstanding as of December 31, 1991 - $302,000.
The City also is liable for non-bonded debt relating to
assessments levied against City owned property and two leases
used to purchase equipment. These items, which are paid out
of the General Fund, total less than $300,000 as of December
31, 1991.
Revenues
The debt service funds receive revenues from the sources
listed above and interest earnings. The following is a sum-
mary of revenues within the debt service funds:
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Taxes $ 56,003 $ 80,687 $ 94,855 $ 390,449
Tax Increments 356,070 449,064 227,000 508,500
Special Assess. 3,963,445 3,166,992 1,783,651 1,667,570
Intergovernmental 247,605 326,058 224,400 254,797
Interest Earnings 808,708 891,528 496,536 581,650
Other 47,830 28,877 -0- -0-
Bond Proceeds 24,800 4,031,476 3,125,000 1,500,000
Transfers from
Other Funds 279,065 751,706 37,630 37,630
Total $5,783,526 $9,726,388 $5,989,072 $4,940,596
15
,...,
\
L..J
,...,
I
U
,...,
J
,...,
:..J
,...,
u
.,
.-..i
"l
Li
,...,
;j
'1
LJ
,...,
u
J
'1
L..J
""1
I
U
,...,
LJ
n
u
""1
u
~
,
J
'1
,
LJ
'1
u
The increase in tax revenue from the 1991 to the 1992 budget
results from the initial levy for the Fire Station Bonds which
were issued in 1991. Special assessment collections are
projected to be down from previous years due to the prepayment
of assessments in past years and the unpredictability of
future prepayments.
Transfers from other funds in 1990 included the transfer of
rema~n~ng monies in the 1987 Construction Fund and amounts
from the Water and Sewer Trunk Funds to the 1987 Debt Service
Fund to help retire a portion of the $5,800,000 1987 Special
Assessment Bonds which matured in 1990.
Expenditures
Debt service funds expend monies for the payment of principal,
interest and related fees on the types of debt mentioned
above. In addition, upon levying of special assessments, the
portion of the assessment relating to administrative costs are
transferred to other funds in accordance with City policy.
The following is a summary of the expenditures within the debt
service funds:
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Bond Principal $1,191,700 $ 9,399,400 $7,151,000 $1,556,000
Bond Interest 1,720,877 1,896,680 1 , 578 , 2'35 1,462,958
Other -0- 141,359 -0- -0-
Fiscal Fees 18,035 93,769 15,000 12,090
Transfer to
Other Funds 259,657 35,134 175,000 -0-
Total $3,190,269 $11,566,342 $8,919,235 $3,031,048
Since bond princip~l and interest payments are fixed, there
should be, and ~s, very little variation from budget. The
amounts shown as other represent a variety of fees and costs,
including costs of issuing new debt and defending special
assessments against appeals. These costs, by their nature,
can not be foreseen and budgeted.
The large principal payments in 1990 and 1991 relate to two
bond issues, each of which was in excess of $5,000,000, which
matured each year. There are no such maturities scheduled for
1992, therefore, the large decrease in the budgeted amount.
16
'1
U
f'~
L.J
n
L-i
n
u
...,
l.J
,..,
.)
'1
:.J
n
J
,....
u
,..,
l)
M
u
'1
u
f 1
I
I)
.-.
v
.11
I
W
"
Lj
n
I
U
"
u
r'l
I I
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND
The Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund was established by
the city Council in 1990 and is being budgeted for the first
time in 1992. The fund is used to accumulate monies from
bonds once they mature which will then be spent on either
improvements or equipment acquisition. The monies in the fund
are the result primarily of interest earnings in excess of
bond rates which were earned on prepaid assessments and
assessments remaining on four bond issues which were totally
paid-off before their maturity
In order to safeguard this fund from political forces, the
City Council requires a 4/5ths majority to expend any monies
from this fund.
The 1992 budget is as follows:
Revenue:
Special Assessments
Interest Earnings
Total
$119,000
55,000
$174,000
Expenditures:
Equipment Acquisition
Equipment Repair
Building Improvements
Total
$ 21,998
35,000
25,500
$ 82,498
The equipment being acquired through this fund is voting
equipment and the replacement of minor fire equipment.
Equipment repair includes the refurbishing of a fire truck in
order to extend its useful life an additional 8-10 years. The
building improvements include the construction of a garage at
city hall to store vehicles and minor improvements to the
public works building.
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
The Water Enterprise Fund is used to account for the revenues
and expenses associated with the operation of the municipal
water system.
Revenues
The Water Fund receives revenue from user fees, late payment
penalties, permit fees, the sale of meters and interest
earnings. The following is a summary of the revenues within
the Water Fund:
17
,....,
w
'"'I
u
,...,
u
.~
LJ
· J
n
...}
r'1
,
u
....\
u
""
u
..,
'...J
,...,
LJ
n
,
LJ
h
c.....
n
w
A
Li
~
u
rr
LJ
.....,
I
U
r,
LJ
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
User Fees $ 185,382 $ 182,691 $ 194,572 $ 184,686
Penalties 6,454 5,081 3,500 6,500
Permit Fees 12,800 10,750 10,000 10,000
Sale of Meters 29,710 26,185 20,000 20,000
Refunds/Reimburs. 268 1,737 -0- -0-
Interest Earnings 8,447 18,054 5,000 12,000
Total Revenue $ 243,061 $ 244,498 $ 233,072 $ 233,186
Rates for user fees, permit fees and the sale of meters are
set by the City Council. The user fee is based on the number
of gallons used with the rate for 1992 being 95 cents per
thousand gallons used. This rate represents a one cent per
thousand increase over 1991's rate and is the first rate
increase in two years.
Expenses
The Water fund expends monies for storage and treatment of
water, distribution of the water throughout the City and
administration relating to the operation of the water system.
The following is a summary of the expenses (excluding
depreciation on contributed assets) within the Water Fund:
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Source, Storage
and Treatment $ 43,588 $ 28,014 $ 76,495 $ 76,595
Distribution 63,990 79,577 112,382 101,318
Administration 29,839 24,762 44,195 54,158
Contingency -0- -0- -0- 1,115
Total $ 137,417 $ 132,353 $ 233,072 $ 233,186
18
r,
u
M
I
LJ
r'l
Li
",
L.J
...,
L1
t1
u
'-,
J
M
Li
~1
u
"
~J
n
u
n
i
u
-,
u
'1
u
"
L1
n
,
U
"..,
LI
.,
I
LI
n
,
u
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
The Sewer Enterprise Fund is used to account for the revenues
and expenses associated with the operation of the municipal
sanitary sewer system.
Revenues
The Sewer Fund receives the revenue from user fees, late
payment penalties, assessments levied for unpaid bills and
interest earnings. The following is a summary of the revenues
within the Sewer Fund:
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
User Fees $ 181,628 $ 306,168 $ 345,969 $ 371 t 800
Penal ties 7,147 7,364 5,500 10,000
Special Assess. 6,998 20,074 9,000 14,500
Interest Earnings 1,274 -0- 1,000 2,000
Transfers In 30,500 30,500 -0-
Total Revenue $ 197,047 $ 364,106 . $ 391,969 $ 398,300
Rates for user fees are set by the City Council. The City
charges a flat user fee of $36 per quarter with a discount to
residents in "Area A" who were charged higher than normal
installation costs in the 1970's. These rates are the same as
the 1991 rates.
Expenses
The Sewer fund expends monies for the operation of sewer lines
within the CitYt the treatment of sewage and administration of
the sewer system. The following is a summary of the expenses
(excluding depreciation on contributed assets) within the
Sewer Fund:
19
,...,
o
..,
LJ
~
L-J
..,
Lj
r-,
L-J
-,
LJ
n
Li
n
L-J
-
H
u
,...,
u
n
L.J
M
I
L-J
....,
I
L-J
",
u
;:-,
U
~
I
u
t1
LJ
,...,
u
,...,
u
Payments to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) are
made to reimburse this organization for the cost of sewage
treatment. Since the mid-1970's, MWCC has owned and operated
all sewage treatment facilities in the Twin Cities area. The
receive their funding from cities who are connected to the
sewer system. The 1992 budget amount is based on their
estimate of 1992 sewage flow from the City of Andover.
TAX LEVY
Minnesota state law governs the amounts and purposes for which
the City can levy taxes. The tax levy set by the City con-
sists of two components. The first, a general levy, is taxes
levied to finance general operations which are accounted for
in the City's General Fund. The amount that can be levied for
this purpose is limited by state law.
The second component of the tax levy is the debt service levy.
These taxes are levied to pay the principal and interest on
bonded debt issued by the City. Under state law, debt
exceeding a certain value must be approved by citizens through
an election. Debt under this level, which is primarily equip-
ment certificates of indebtedness, can be issued without voter
approval.
Change in Taxes Levied from 1991 to 1992
As mentioned earlier, the increases in taxes from year to year
are limited by state law and voter approval. The following is
a summary of the increases in the City's levy from 1991 to
1992:
20
,..,
u
r-1
1
U
r'1
U
n
l..J
,....
;
LJ
,..,
,
L.J
"
t,)
r1
u
M
LJ
.,
u
"
I
U
'1
u
1
LJ
~
,
u
"
,
u
r1
1
U
M
I
U
n
'0
n
!
./
1991 Certified Levy
Increase from lost
Local Government
Aid
Increase from first
year of Fire Bond
levy
Decrease in other
debt levies
1992 Certified Levy
General
Levy
$ 1,364,215
63,988
$ 1,428,203
Debt
Service
Levy Total
$ 119,855 $ 1,484,070
63,988
415,407 415,407
(26,816) (26,816)
$ 508,446 $ 1,936,649
As this information shows, the vast majority of the increase
in the 1992 certified tax levy relates to the Fire Bonds which
were approved by voters in 1990. The increase is so large
since 1992 will be the first year taxes have been levied for
these bonds. Future years will see a slight decrease in the
levy for the Fire Bonds as the yearly principle and interest
payments decline slightly.
The general levy includes a $5,000 levy for the operation of
the Lower Rum River Watershed District. This levy will be
spread against all property within this watershed district.
In previous years, the costs for this watershed were spread
against the entire City. The creation of the taxing district
in 1991 allows for this amount to be levied against only those
properties within the watershed district.
Each portion of the levy is decreased by state aids and fiscal
disparity distributions to arrive at the portion of the tax
levy actually paid by property owners. The appendix contains
a reconciliation of the certified levy to the amount of taxes
paid by property owners.
Calculation of Taxes
Under Minnesota law, property taxes are calculated by
multiplying a tax capacity rate times a taxable value. The
computation to arrive at taxable value is prescribed by state
law. The appendix contains the calculations showing how the
local tax base (taxable value) and tax rates are figured.
Property Tax Changes for 1992
During 1991 several laws affecting taxes payable in 1992 were
enacted by the state legislature. The following is a summary
of the more significant changes as they relate to the City:
1. The three percent inflation factor was removed from
the general levy limit.
21
n
L.J
n
L.J
,...,
,
L.J
,..,
I
L.J
,..,
I
W
n
Li
n
l..J
.,
i
L.l
n
u
r"'l
LJ
n
I
LJ
,..,
L.J
n
i
U
...,
u
..
u
,"
U
,...,
,
L.J
,..,
i
U
n
,
I
U
2. The growth factor, which was equal to one-half the
growth in population or households, was removed from
the general levy limit.
3. The City was given the authority to levy taxes equal
to the amount of local government aid lost from 1991
to 1992.
4. The classification rates used to determine the net tax
capacity of a property were decreased for homes valued
in excess of $110,000 and for business of all values.
The effect of the first two changes resulted in the loss of
over $135,000 of levy authority which could have been used to
provide services to meet the demands of a growing population
and constantly increasing prices. The third item, while
providing no additional revenue when compared with prior
years, did restore revenue which would have otherwise been
lost.
The last item resulted in the City's net tax capacity showing
a slight increase of $32,161 while the estimated market value
for all properties in the City increased $34,178,700. These
increases can be compared to increases from 1990 to 1991 of
$1,132,262 and $46,614,900 for net tax capacity and estimated
market value respectively. The effect of this change was to
shift a larger share of the tax burden to homes valued under
$110,000.
Allocation of Property Taxes Levied
Under the property tax system in the state of Minnesota,
property taxes are levied by counties, school districts,
cities and special taxing districts. School districts receive
the largest share of property taxes paid, followed by Anoka
County and the City of Andover. The following is a comparison
of each jurisdictions percentage of property taxes payable in
1992 .
Property located
in Independent
School District *15
51.1%
Property located
in Independent
School District *11
52.0%
30.4%
16.1%
1. 5%
100.0%
School District
Anoka County
City of Andover
Other Taxing Districts
31. 2%
16.5%
1. 2%
100.0%
22
"
LJ
....,
LJ
r,
LJ
"
LJ
n
u
n
,
u
"
LJ
n
u
"
u
r"'l
LJ
n
u
n
,
,
u
"
LJ
n
u
r1
u
..,
LJ
n
,
u
"
u
n
I
I I
Comparison with Other Cities
While the City of Andover is experiencing a larger than normal
increase in 1992, its tax rate is still comparable to other
neighboring cities. The following table shows the average tax
rates for 1991 and 1992 for cities neighboring Andover as well
as thos~ with similar populations and tax bases.
City of Andover
Neighboring Cities:
Coon Rapids
Ramsey
Anoka
Oak Grove
Ham Lake
1991 Average
Tax Rate
10.925%
1992 Estimated
Tax Rate
17.528%
16.103%
15.216%
20.181%
28.464%
12.175%
15.589%
13.413%
18.388%
28.865%
11.025%
Similar Ci ties:
Robbinsdale
Champlin
Hastings
16.472%
18.442%
27.779%
21. 771%
21.083%
26.968%
PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE
Building Trends
The City of Andover has been characterized by rapid growth in
residential housing over the last several years. Despite a
slow down in this trend, it is anticipated that the increase
in new housing will continue and will be comparable to 1991.
This increase in residents and streets will continue to put a
strain on the operations of the City's General Fund.
Relationship with the State of Minnesota
Recent history shows that the City is subject to the political
decisions made at the State level. During both 1990 and 1991,
the State Legislature and Governor have reduced aid to cities
in mid-year without giving the City the opportunity to recoup
this lost revenue. For 1992, aid was also reduced, however
the City was allowed to increase taxes in this amount.
The state has also attempted to keep property tax increases
for 1992 below ten percent, by eliminating the growth and
inflation factors that existed in the levy limits. The effect
of this action was to in essence require a growing City like
Andover to serve more people with no additional dollars.
23
~
,
u
r,
u
u
So what can be expected for 1992 and beyond? It is difficult
to predict since the State has made decisions based on the
their financial problems as well as political agendas. Under
current law, levy limits on cities are scheduled to be
repealed for taxes payable in 1993. However, it is very
possible that not only will levy limits be reinstated, but
they may include little or no growth as was done for 1992. In
addition, further mid-year and future year aid changes are
possible based on the Governor's projection of a $500 million
deficit in the state budget for 1992-1993.
~
,
u
~
i
U
r1
r1
u
Debt
LJ
The City anticipates issuing new debt in 1992, however not to
the extent of previous years. The City has a number of
improvement projects which need to be funded. It is
anticipated that in mid-1992, the City will sell between
$1,500,000 and $4,000,000 of special assessment bonds. These
bonds will be fully paid by special assessments levied against
the benefitted properties. In addition, the City Council is
contemplating selling equipment certificates in an amount that
will result in no tax increase from the 1990 level. A final
decision is expected on these certificates during 1992.
r1
U
n
r,
,
u
~
LJ
n
I
U
n
,
,
U
n
,
u
i,
u
n
u
~
LJ
n
I
U
n
I
U
n
,
I
U
24
,..,
,
LJ
,..,
,
i
u
'l
u
,..,
!
LJ
1
u
,..,
,
LJ
,.,
I
LJ
I"l
I
U
,..,
LJ
n
I
U
n
,
LJ
,..,
I
LJ
,..,
LJ
n
I
U
,.,
u
,.,
u
,..,
LJ
,..,
u
,..,
lJ
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Taxes:
Current $ 677,593 $ 884,995 $1,026,643 $1,074,214
Delinquent 34,424 26,260 46,000 39,500
Total Taxes 712,017 911,255 1,072,643 1,113,714
Licenses & Permits
Business 15,647 16,054 18,200 20,325
Non-Business:
Building related 238,105 192,528 199,910 232,723
Other 5,331 4,211 5,600 6,250
Total Licenses
& Permits 259,803 212,793 223,710 259,298
Intergovernmental:
Community Develop.
Block Grant 16,441 66,919 -0- 47,723
Local Gov't Aid 350,045 102,657 45,455 38,841
Tax Credits 228,414 335,007 337,572 353,989
State Highway Aid 22,260 22,260 122,000 97,421
Other 42,170 89,879 87,172 106,352
Total Intergovern. 659,330 616,722 592,199 644,326
Charges for Services:
Street Lighting 33,971 54,521 51,500 56,900
Other 24,985 21,441 20,850 23,300
Total Charges for
Services 58,956 75,962 72,350 80,200
Court Fines 51,614 46,650 59,000 40,000
Miscellaneous:
Interest Earnings 30,015 28,147 30,000 54,600
RefundsjReimb. 40,048 38,480 30,000 25,000
Other 3,643 3,433 4,300 4,100
Total Miscell. 73,706 70,060 64,300 83,700
Transfers from
Other Funds 70,545 188,318 120,000 93,300
Total $1,885,251 $2,121,760 $2,204,202 $2,314,538
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
26
,...,
L.l
...,
I
tJ GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
1 1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
LJ Actual Actual Budget Budget
,..., General Government:
I Ci ty Council $ 30,700 $ 27,614 $ 34,108 $ 34,802
U
Newsletter 8,910 5,976 6,831 4,771
,.., Mayor 4,200 4,232 4,200 4,521
, Elections 6 10,117 13,586
LJ Administration 86,961 102,887 105,171 104,359
Financial Admin. 104,078 100,574 102,891 93,278
,..., Audi ting 12,392 12,185 10,000 10,000
Ll Assessing 25,465 28,707 31,500 38,289
Attorney 84,320 60,184 60,300 50,800
..., Planning & Zoning 70,519 55,399 50,702 52,649
I Data processing -0- 18,556 19,095 21,248
L.l Ci ty Hall Bldg. 72,319 32,714 35,833 44,663
Fire Stations 13,321 11,343 14,190 33,700
r-, Public Works Bldg. 29,172 40,307 23,600 22,932
I Senior Citizen's
LJ Center 7,308 6,976 9,635 8,456
,.., Equipment Bldg. 7,886 5,039 3,593 3,077
Engineering 87,879 70,968 71,165 68,176
LJ Total General
Government 645,436 593,778 582,814 609,307
,..,
I
LJ Public Safety:
n Police Protection 365,608 394,768 404,078 411,737
I Fire Protection 170,821 197,880 231,597- 263,750
L.J Rescue Service 23,463 29,110 37,057 35,972
Protective Inspect. 133,490 122,622 127,530 126,797
n Civil Defense 2,081 536 2,300 2,300
i Animal Control 9,952 9,991 9,096 10,235
L.J Total Public
,..., Safety 705,415 754,907 811,658 850,791
L.J
Public Works:
,.., Street & Highways 130,347 144,566 213,788 182,588
L.J Snow & Ice Removal 96,413 78,415 122,352 121,918
Storm Sewers 15,191 19,680 22,821 23,257
,., Street Lighting 20,340 13,445 15,000 14,450
Street Signs 21,793 28,417 31,606 31,637
LJ Traffic Signals 2,811 5,134 3,000 10,680
Street Lights-
,..., Billed 24,570 37,069 38,000 42,264
I Trees & Weed
u Control 3,463 9,488 9,476 9,668
Total Public
,.., Works 314,928 336,214 456,043 436,462
,
u
n
LJ
,.., 27
L.J
r'1
U
n
L.l
r'1
L.l
n
L.l
,..,
I
LJ
,..,
L.l
n
,
Li
,.,
L.l
,..,
u
,..,
L.l
n
L.l
n
LJ
,..,
U
,..,
LJ
,.,
u
n
u
,..,
u
n
L.l
,..,
L.J
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT (Continued)
1991 1992
1989 1990 Revised Adopted
Actual Actual Budget Budget
Park & Recreation 218,562 261,456 219,897 229,428
Recycling 20,116 39,567 37,129 36,811
Economic Development -0- 14,289 16,544 17,994
Unallocated 42,063 31,552 23,773 24,950
Contingency -0- -0- 43,544 56,072
Other Financing Uses 55,829 98,037 12,800 52,723
Total $2,002,349 $2,129,800 $2,204,202 $2,314,538
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
28
, 1
LJ
n
,
LJ
'1
LJ
n
,
,u
n
u
n
L.J
n
L1
n
,
LJ
n
u
n
I
U
r-,
I
L.J
n
I
U
n
L.J
n
LJ
n
u
n
u
n
u
n
I
U
n
,
I I
CITY OF ANDOVER
TAX LEVY INFORMATION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
YEAR MILL DOLLARS ASSESSED
PAYABLE RATE LEVIED VALUATION
1983 11. 90 570,009 45,200,690
1984 13 .44 645,466 43,692,054
1985 12.95 691,257 44,785,481
1986 14.49 802,833 47,832,782
1987 13.93 878,161 54,442,470
1988 14.38 995,114 60,375,286
For years beginning after payable 1988, the laws concerning tax
levies were changed. The new system uses tax capacity rates and
tax capacity instead of mill rates and assessed valuation. There
is no method to equate or compare the two systems, except for
comparing "Dollars Levied."
YEAR TAX CAPACITY DOLLARS
PAYABLE RATE LEVIED TAX CAPACITY
1989 9.421% $1,006,268 $ 9,214,934
1990 * 13.077% $1,349,942 $ 7,043,958 **
1991 10.924% $1,484,070 $ 8,176,220
1992 *** 17.528% $1,936,649 $ 8,208,381
* The large increase in tax capacity rate and dollars levied
for 1990 are a result of the shift in state aid from the
City of Andover to the two independent school districts
serving the City's residents. This aid shift totaled
$266,801, or approximately 77.63% of the total dollar
increase.
** - For taxes payable in 1990, the State Legislature replaced
tax capacity with net tax capacity. Net tax capacity is
the tax capacity less the valuation used in calculating
homestead and agricultural aid credit (HACA). Due to this
change and a change in the HACA calculation, the amounts
shown as tax capacity for payable 1989 and 1990 are not
comparable.
*** -
The tax capacity
the first levy for
totaled $415,407
3.747%.
rate and taxes levied for 1992 include
the 1990 Fire Station Bonds. This levy
which equates to a tax capacity rate of
29
,...,
u
,...,
CITY OF ANDOVER
u
COMPARISON OF 1991 AND 1992
TAX LEVY DATA
'1
Ll
,...,
I
U
Estimated Market Value
1 Calculation of City Tax Base
u
,..,
Net Tax Capacity
Tax Increment Captured Value
District #1-1 (F-9)
District #1-2 (G-1)
L.J
"
I
U
Area Wide Contribution
Valuation
"
u
Local Tax Base
"
u Components of Certified Tax Levy
" General Levy
U Lower Rum River Watershed
Taxing District Levy
n
u
Bonded Indebtedness Levy:
1991 Fire Station Bonds
Certificates of Indebtedness:
1990
1989
1987
1986
,...,
u
,...,
LJ
Total Certified Levy
,...,
U
"
Reconciliation of Taxes Spread by County
u
Certified Tax Levy
,...,
Aids Paid by the State of
Minnesota to Reduce
Property Taxes
u
n
,
Area Wide Distribution
LJ
Rounding Difference
,...,
Taxes Spread by County
u
,...,
30
LJ
1992
1991
$488,599,100
$454,420,400
------------
------------
:::::::!:::=:I=::::::::::=:::=
$ 8,208,381 $ 8,176,220
(366,097) (353,440)
(201,507) (211,488)
(560,209) (507,878)
$ 7,080,568 $ 7,103,414
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
$ 1,423,203
5,000
415,407
28,766
27,466
36,807
-0-
$ 1,936,649
===========
$ 1,364,215
-0-
-0-
29,870
29,517
39,002
21,466
$ 1,484,070
-----------
-----------
$ 1,936,649
$ 1,484,070
(454,233) (404,625)
(244,907) (303,462)
44 65
$ 1,237,553 $ 776,048
=======:::::=== -----------
-----------
,...,
L..J
,...,
L..J
,.,
L..J
,...,
L..J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COMPARISON OF 1991 AND 1992
TAX LEVY DATA
1
L..J Calculation of Tax Capacity Rate
,..,
L..J
,..,
L..J
,...,
L..J
,...,
u
,..,
u
,..,
L..J
,.,
u
,...,
u
,.,
u
,...,
u
n
u
,...,
,
d
,..,
u
,...,
u
Taxes Spread by County
Less Taxes Spread to Lower Rum
River Watershed District
Net Taxes Spread to Entire City
Divided by Local Tax Base
Tax Capacity Rate
Calculation of Taxes Spread by County
1992
1992
$ 1,237,553
3,835
1,233,718
7,080,568
17.424%
-----------
-----------
Tax
Capaci ty
Rate
Dollars
Spread
12.838% $ 909,003
General Levy
Bonded Indebtedness Levy 4.586% 324,715
Levy for Entire City 17.424% $1,233,718
Lower Rum River Watershed
Taxing District Levy 0.104% 3,835
Total Levy 17.528% $1,237,553
-------- ----------
-------- ----------
31
$
1991
776,048
-0-
776,048
7,103,414
10.925%
-----------
-----------
1991
Tax
Capaci ty Dollars
Rate Spread
10.043% $ 713,396
0.882% 62,652
10.925% $ 776,048
0.000% -0-
10.925% $ 776,048
-------- ---------
-------- ---------
..--,
,
L..J
n
u
"
J
n
!
U
n
u
n
,
LJ
,-,
L.J
....,
u
n
u
n
I
U
n
u
n
u
n
u
n
u
n
u
,..,
u
n
L.J
n
u
n
I j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COMPARISON OF 1991 AND 1992
TAX LEVY DATA
Tax Capacity Rates and Components
portion of City Included in
Independent School District
U5
City of Andover
Anoka County
School District #15
Metropolitan Council
Metro. Transit Authority
Metro. Mosquito Control
County Railroad Authority
Total
Portion of City Included in
Independent School District
#11 and the Lower Rum River
watershed Taxing District
City of Andover
Anoka County
School District #11
Metropolitan Council
Metro. Transit Authority
Metro. Mosquito Control
County Railroad Authority
Total
32
1992
105.850%
--------
--------
17.528%
32.990%
54.088%
.551%
.306%
.387%
.000%
105.850%
--------
--------
108.287%
========
17.528%
32.990%
56.525%
.551%
.306%
.387%
.000%
108.287%
--------
--------
1991
92.734%
========
10.925%
31.400%
49.349%
.322%
.147%
.438%
.153%
92.734%
--------
--------
95.164%
--------
--------
10.925%
31.400%
51.779%
.322%
.147%
.438%
.153%
95.164%
--------
--------
,..,
LJ
,.,
,
,
LJ
r"1
L1
,..,
u
,..,
LJ
,..,
I
L1
,.,
u
,..,
L..J
n
u
,..,
I
u
,..,
u
,..,
u
n
LJ
,...,
LJ
,...,
u
,...,
,
u
,..,
L..J
,...,
LJ
n
L..J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COMPARISON OF 1991 AND 1992
TAX LEVY DATA
Tax Capacity Rates and Components (Con't)
Portion of City Included in
Independent School District
#11 and the Coon Creek
Watershed District
city of Andover
Anoka County
School District #15
Coon Creek Watershed District
Metropolitan Council
Metro. Transit Authority
Metro. Mosquito Control
County Railroad Authority
Total
33
1992
1991
108.982% 95.401%
-------- ========
--------
17.424% 10.925%
32.990% 31. 400%
56.525% 51.779%
.799% .237%
.551% .322%
.306% .147%
.387% .438%
.000% .153%
108.982% 95.401%
-------- ========
--------
.,
..
..,
~
..,
IiII
FEASIBiliTY REPORT
..,
....
r""l
-
,.,
lilt
MSA DESIGN
ELDORADO STREET NW
CITY PROJECT 91-27 f\-
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
,.,
..
11
..
..,
..
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
..,
...
..,
...
,.,
.IIll
..,
...
...,
u
..,
MARCH 3, 1992
LA
COMM. NO.1 0066-03
..,
loA
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
~
~
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
FAX 612/292-0083
~
.J.
r"1
,
...
,..,
I
LJ
1
LJ
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS-ARCHiTECTS-PLANNERS
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
MARCH 3, 1992
rr
i
LJ
~
I
...j
J
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
.....,
LJ
MSA DESIGN
ELDORADO STREET NW
n
LJ
CITY PROJECT 91-27
1
u
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
1
u
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO.1 0066-03
.....,
LJ
,..,
u
r'1
L.J
,..,
I
L..J
,..,
I
LJ
I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
"1
I
LJ
n
I
W
"1
L1
J
....,
I j
10066-03
,...,
I
LJ
,...,
I
L.J MSA DESIGN
J ELDORADO STREET NW
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'1
~ Project Location 2
J Existing Conditions 2
Roadway Designation 2
,...,
I Traffic Analysis 2-4
L.J
:-, Proposed Improvements 4,5
;
L1
Initiation 5
'l
L1 Right-of-way/Easements 5
1 Feasibility 6
L..J
Permits 6
...,
u Financing 6
,..., Design Basis 6, 7
I j
:.....J
Estimated Project Costs 7
1 Estimated Construction Costs 8,9,10
u
,..., Typical Sections
I
LJ Location Map
...,
;
U
n
LJ
,...,
J
'l
J
,...,
Ll
""l -1- 1 0066-03
L J
1
LJ
1
LJ
1
u
~
L.J
J
1
LJ
,...,
I
u
'1
LJ
J
,...,
LJ
..,
i
LJ
,...,
i
W
,...,
J
r-;
LJ
'""
d
J
1
L.J
,...,
LJ
"
I
L..J
MSA DESIGN
ELDORADO STREET NW
Project Location
This feasibility report is for the construction of Eldorado Street NW as a Municipal State
Aid Street from Anoka County Road 116 to approximately 3,800 feet north and 147th
Avenue within Johnson's Oakmount Terrace. The project is located in the East 1/2 of
Section 30, Township 32N, Range 24W in Andover, Minnesota, as shown on the project
location map in the appendix of this report.
Existing Conditions
The existing conditions for that segment of Eldorado Street NW outlined within this
report is designated as a non-existent Municipal State Aid Street. Segment 1 is from
Anoka County Highway No. 116 to 1,600 feet north. Approximately 450 LF, or 0.83
acres, will be constructed through wetlands.
Segment 2 of roadway is from 1,600 feet north of County Road 116 to the intersection
with the west line of the Meadows of Round Lake Subdivision, a distance of 2,200 feet.
This a platted street to be constructed to MSA Standards during the 1992 Construction
Season.
Segment No.3 is an existing bituminous road (147th Street NW) within Johnson's
Oakmount Terrace Subdivision, from the west line of the Meadows of Round Lake
Subdivision west to 7th Avenue NW. The length of this segment is 1,320 feet.
Roadway Designation
It is proposed to designate all three segments of Eldorado Street NW and 147th Avenue
NW described herein as a Municipal State Aid Street. The resolution establishing this
route as a State Aid Street was passed by the Andover City Council on February 4,
1992, and forwarded to the Metro District State Aid Office.
Traffic Analysis
A limited traffic study was undertaken to detennine: the number of trips generated by
housing developments in the study area; the directional distribution of those trips; and
the adequacy of the current street system to accommodate the projected traffic
volumes.
-2-
1 0066-03
'I
,
u
J
r"1
J
In addition, traffic volume estimates were made on the basis of a street system that
included the extension of Eldorado Street NW to County Road 116.
~
LJ
1.
Trip Generation
r"1
,
LJ
Anticipated daily trip generation to and from the The Meadows of Round Lake,
Shirley's Addition, and Auditor's Subdivision, were estimated utilizing Trip
Generation, 5th Edition, as published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers. The average number of trips per lot used for the analysis was 9.55.
An assumption was made that vehicle trips to and from 47 lots in Shirley's
Addition and Auditor's Subdivision would pass along 143rd Avenue NW.
The estimated number of trips generated by the two housing areas at full
development are:
"l
,
u
"l
,
u
...,
J
162
47
lots =
lots =
1,547
449
vehicle trips
vehicle trips
,.., 2. Trip Distribution
L.J
,..,
i
LJ
Based upon the present traffic volumes along County Road 7 and County Road 9,
an estimate of the traffic distribution pattern was made. The estimated trip
distribution percentages and resulting traffic volumes are shown in Table 1.
'l
TABLE 1
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
,
u
~
!
U
% TripsNolume
,..,
Location
w/o Eldorado St. NW Ext.l
Trips
West East
with Eldorado St. NW Ext.
West East
South
J
,...,
!
The Meadows of
Round Lake 1547 40%/619 60%/928
(162 lots)
17%/263
24%/371
59%/913
L.J
.......
J
Shirley's Addition/
Auditor's Sub. 449 10%/45
(47 lots)
90%/404
10%/45
90%/404
n
J
1
L.J
Total
664
1332.
308
775.
913
.Estlmated volume on 143rd Avenue NW near County Road 9.
,.,
i
L.J
...,
I j
-3-
1 0066-03
"'1
U
r'1
,
,
LJ
3.
AnalyslslRecommendatlon
The forecasted traffic volume on 143rd Avenue NW is 1,332 vehicles per day if
Eldorado Street NW is not extended to County Road 116. However, the
characteristic of a local street, such as 143rd Avenue NW, is to carry less than
1,000 vehicles per day (refer to Table 2, Functional Classification System
Characteristics for Roadways).
With the extension of Eldorado Street NW, the forecasted volume on 143rd
Avenue is 775 vehicles per day, which is within the local street guidelines.
r,
Ll
n
LJ
,.,
I
d
~
It is recommended that Eldorado Street NW be extended to County Road 116.
Eldorado Street NW, as a Municipal State Aid Street, would be designed to
collector standards and allow the local street system to function as originally
intended.
,
LJ
r,
,
LJ
1 Proposed Improvements
LJ
1
u The roadway design for Segment I from County Road No. 116 to 1 ,600 feet north
will be rural design standard with two 12 foot driving lanes and two 10 foot paved
! shoulders and ins lopes will be graded 4:1. A 9-ton geometric design and 30 mph
LJ design speed will be used.
! Preliminary soil borings indicate that approximately 500 feet of roadway within
LJ Segment 1 contain three to eight feet of peat (approximately 450 feet in defined
wetlands).
1. Roadway
'1
u
That part of roadway through the wetlands will be constructed by removing all of
the peat underneath the proposed roadway and replacing it with select granular
borrow.
r,
I
L....I
..,
I
U
The roadway design for Segment 2 from 1,600 feet north of County Road No. 116
to 3,800 feet north will be designed to urban design standards, 32 feet wide with
"no parking" restrictions.
n
.J
A surmountable concrete curb and gutter, complete storm sewer, stormwater
detention ponds, and sidewalk will be included. The geometric design will be to 9
ton standards with 30 mph design speed.
The roadway design on 147th Avenue from the west line of the Meadows of
Round lake to 7th Avenue will be designed to urban standards 32 feet wide with
"No Parking" restrictions.
r,
J
"'1
u
A vertical face concrete curb and gutter, complete storm sewer and sidewalks will
be included. The geometric design will be to 9 ton standards with 30 mph design
speed.
'!
U /
n
I
d
-4-
1 0066-03
'l
L.J
1
u
r,
J
1
u
2. Storm Sewer
J
The proposed storm sewer improvements on Eldorado Street are shown in Figure
3. The storm sewer line trom 147th Avenue to 145th Avenue intercepts runoff
trom abutting properties as well as portions ot drainage trom intersecting streets
between 147th Avenue to 145th Avenue. The discharge ot this line discharges in
Pond No.6.
"
I
U
r,
J
J
The low point 650' south ot 145th Avenue NW intercepts runoff trom the abutting
property at the south end ot the Meadows ot Round Lake subdivision and directs
it into Pond No.3.
It is proposed to Provide tor drainage ot 147th Avenue (Segment No.3) as shown
in Figure NO.1.
""1
U
It is proposed to tund the cost eligible items ot storm sewer costs trom MSA tunds.
Cost eligible items generally include drainage structures located in the right-ot-
way and a proportional cost ot the storm sewer outfall line. An estimated
breakdown ot cost eligible items is shown on Tables 1 - 3, the exact proportion ot
MSA eligible costs is determined by the MnDOT Hydraulics Engineer.
'l
u
1 3. Sanitary Sewer and Watermaln
LJ
r"1
W
Sanitary sewer and watermain will be constructed as part ot the development ot
the Meadows ot Round Lake, Project 91-27, as described in the Feasibility Report
dated December 17,1991.
Initiation
,...,
,
I
u
,....,
The project was initiated by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc., the owner and
developer ot the project, and the Andover City Council
;
t.J
r,
u
Rlght-of-way/Easements
r'l
r
L.J
All right-ot-way and easements required tor street and utility purposes on Eldorado
Street are proposed to be dedicated as part ot the platting process. A 66-toot right-ot-
way exists on 147th Avenue NW. Additional right-ot-way or easements may be
required as determined by Final Design.
"'1
I
LJ
,.,
J
,...,
I
I j
-5-
1 0066-03
J
J
J
J
J
, J
J
J
J
1 J
I,
J
I
IJ
Feasibility
The project is feasible.
Permits
Permits will be required from the Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization and from the Department of Natural Resources and/or Corps of Engineers
for drainage improvements and work within wetland areas, and from the Anoka County
Highway Department for connection onto a County State Aid Highway. Approval of
plans and specifications by MnDOT State Aid will also be required.
Financing
It is proposed to fund the project with a combination of Muncipal State Aid funds and
assessments to benefitted properties. It is proposed to levy the assessments in
accordance with the previously mentioned feasibility study for the Meadows of Round
Lake. The City can be reimbursed from its State Aid account costs of eligible street and
storm sewer construction. The eligible amount for construction is estimated at
$597,047.28. An additional 18% of the construction cost ($107,468.51) is eligible for
engineering expenses. The total eligible amount is estimated at $704,515.79.
Design Basis
1.
Segment 1
80' right-of-way
44' top (see Figure No.2)
Segment 2
Construction including (sidewalks) to a 9-ton urban design. Abutting property to
be assessed cost for 7-ton design. "No Parking".
60' right-of-way
32' width
Surmountable Curb (see Figure No.3)
~
LJ
J
J
J
J
J
2.
'l
J
-6-
10066-03
Revised 3-9-92
~
LJ
1
LJ
~
J
,...,
I
I
LJ
J
J
J
1
u
fl
LJ
.....,
I
~
J
J
fl
U
J
J
J
J
J
J
3.
Segment 3
Design for complete 9-ton design - w/sidewalk.
66' right-of-way,
Vertical Face Curb,
32' width
"No Parking". (see Figure No.3)
Estimated Project Cost
The following chart is an estimate of MSA participating and nonparticipating costs. The
costs presented herein are estimates only and are not guaranteed prices. Final
contracts will be awarded on a unit price basis. Costs are estimated based on current
construction prices.
Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Total
Construction Costs
Storm Sewer and Streets $332,505.83 $195,218.08 $92,133.33 $619,857.24
MSA - Participating
Construction Costs 329,945.87 176,288.08 90,813.33 597,047.28
MSA Participating
Expenses (18%) 59.390.26 31.731.85 16.346.40 107.468.51
Total Estimated MSA
Participating Project Cost 389,336.13 208,019.93 107,159.73 704,515.79
Non-participating
Construction Costs 2,560.00 18,930.00 1,320.00 22,810.00
Non-participating Expenses (12%
of Total Construction Costs) 39.900.70 23.426.17 11.055.00 74.381.87
Total Estimated Non-
participating Project Cost 42.460.70 42.356.17 12.376.00 97 .192.87
Total Project Cost $431,796.83 $250,376.10 $119,535.73 $801,708.66
-7-
1 0066-03
Revised 3-~-~~
'"1
I
W
'"
~
J '"
..
00
,.,
J ..r
J ~81
~~I
I
J .. .
~ .. .
.. ~ I
~ ~ f
8
1 I
U ~ ~ I
00'
J ., ~ I
r
..
l aa f
3~
LJ 8 I
~ ~II
J
....,
LJ ~~I
'1 8
~
..,
'1 HH
5~
:.J
-, ~ I
, ...
..J
0
:z; I
1 ..
!
;.J
I:l
1 j '" '" I
0 .. .
..J I a
.. ...
'" ...
., ~t-.co
"'''0 '" ~
.. 10...
1 '" .....'" ~ H
0 a;~g ..
u 00
;.J 'i ~ E
a"'~:I:~ '"
~ H~O _H I:l ~
tI) P:;~tI)
-, ~ ., 00 '" ~
I ~ ;~ei~ ~~I
;.J ..
00 '"
....,
.J
-,
I
J
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI'"
~ooooooooaoooooo~oooooooooooooooooo m
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
~oo~oooO~OOOOOOONOOOOoooooooooooooo ~
M~0~0000~~~00000rlO~~000000000000000 0
~ w oo~m~~ ~ ~~ ro ~ ~
... ............... (1)0 (1)0(1)0 .. .. ..
M m OON"~~ ~ rl N
(1)0 ~ ~~NNrlrl (1)0 (1)0 M
(1)0 0"0000 M
~ ~
00000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
rlOOOOOOO~OOOOOOO~rlOOOOOOOOONOOOOOOO
~ OOO~~N 0 ~ ~
N OOOrl~~ ~ ~ rl
~ """OIl)M
...... rlN....
0000000000000000000000000000000000010
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. .
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
000~000000~~~000~000~0000N~~00""""0~"" ~
'" ... '"
- ~ -
... '"
~ ~
00000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOO
...
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOj'"
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ro
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
MOO~OOOO~OOOOOOONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~
M0""~0000~~~0000""rl000""0000~""~""0""""000 .
M m oo~m~~ ~ ~~ m ~ ~
... ..................... 0 ~0 ... ~ ...
M ~ OONrl~~ N ~
o ~ ~NN<<rlrl 0 N
~ 0rl""",,(,I)o~ (I')
~ ~
00000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOOOOOO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"OOOOOOO~OOOOOOO~"OOOOOOO~O"OOOOOOO
~ OOON~N 0 ~ ~
N OOOrl~~ ~ .,.
~ ~O~(I')
..-4 ......N..-4
MOOOOOOOOOOO~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
(l')O~~OOO~OOOONO~N~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M(I')HMO~~"""~rlM"""rl~~""""""ON~~~m......~oooooo~~o~
M~000~00~NNN0000000""""""""""""NNMOOOOO~000
M ...... ~0~ w 00~0~0~~m~N~"" 0
.". 0 000...0
'" ... ...
~ "" ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=====~~=~
"
8 - ......rla ~u
a ~ "'~:~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~..S g 0 .,~.,~~~~~~" H~i
~ s>~ ~............~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ H~ Z
"z ~~2u3~~., ~~ . ~~~~~~~eea~ ~5 2
~S~~S ~ONN~ ~~~g ~~~~~~g~~~~ ~O~
~~2~0~~~~~" g~gx "''''''''''''''''''' a~~a~~e
:Z;H>"~~!~ :1::1:...., OoH "'''''''''''''''''''~~==o ~ .,
o~~~~o M H~~O~ oo=~ ~~
~Oo~~:= ~~gg~~~~B'" ~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~
~g6~~I~al~~6~3~~~S~~MMMMMMM~~ggg~5~B
~;>;~tl= ~o ..~..tl~... >-1:;J""""", oogg
~~o~~ ~~ ~~~~g~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
..
o
..
......N(I').~~~m~O......N(I')~~~~m~O......N(I').~~~m~O......NM.,.~
............................................................NNNNNNN NNN(I')M(I') (1')(1')(1')
10066-03
Revised 3-9-92
-8-
'1
LJ
....,
J
1
u
~
u
1
LJ
J
J
,.....,
I
U
,.....,
LJ
,...,
,
LJ
~
LJ
'l
u
~ '"
LJ
g
,..., I
!
u tl
I I
,....., '" III
0 ..
LJ , a
.. '"
III '"
OJ ~....co
"'''0 III
.. 10...
,....., III .....111 ~
0 a;~g
u
J ~ i
51111':l:O:~
H 0 0 ..H
1II~1i:~1II
...., ~ OJ .. III ~
o H
U ~ .ca~~~
;] u u ..
.. III
,.....,
J
,...,
L.J
~ g I
~~
..0
~~
MOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~
MOOOOOOooooo~oooooooooooooooooo~~oo 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~o~ooooo~n~o~onnoooo~o~OOOOOOOONNOO ~
M*m*~n**~Nm*~n~~**O~N~nNOOOOOOO~~OO "
M m N~ ".~ .N.M ~~m~~~nn.m~~m~"ON N
o "'" ... .. .. .. .. .. ......,. .. ... ...** .. .. ..** .. ...
M NN "~n "Nm ~M~n ~.. NM" N" n
41)0 ** N"~ N*N **** *"* "** ** ~
*** .......... 41)0"", "
...
..
..
~H
~5
"g
00000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooonnoo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"OOONOOonnnonoooOOonnONOOO"".MN~mNO
~ <<a NN~ ~nno O~n~.Nmn " N 0
n n O~~ MN.~ mN~M Mn" M
tr) .. N tr'l
'"
u
'"'~
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ooooooooooooooooooooo~~~ooooooo~~oo 0
~-~~~~~------~---_00~00~00~N0~0~no~ ~
~~M~~~M~ N_m~ ~
... ...- ... ... ..._- __411-
MN N~M ~
-- --- M
...
..
..
~H
g5
'"'g
00000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~.OOO~~~O
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON~~mNOOOOOOMMOO
~.M('II(I')~ .... C"'4
NM MN ....
.c"
;]8
~
(l')OOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO m
MOOOOOOooooo~oooooooooooooooooo~~oo 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monooooo~nno~o~~oooon~ONOOOOOoo~noo m
M_~~~n~-~Nm_~~~~_~OM~n~(I')Oo.mOOONmON ~
(I') m Na ....~~ ~N.(I') ~~~~.O~~N.~~~.~N~ N
_ ...... _ ... ... ... ... ... ... ...~ ... ... ...0_ ... ......_ ..~
(I') NN ....~n MN~ ~Mn~ .~N ('11M" .... ~
- 00 NM" N_N ____ ___ M0_ _ ~
____ 0 _ _....
...
..
..
.cH
;]5
g
00000000000000000000000000000000000
oooo~ooooooooooooooooooooO~~OOO~MNO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOOONooon~nonoooooonM~~NmOOO.(I')Nn~....o
~ N~ NNa ~~~o o~aMN~.a M M m
n ~ O~~ (l')N.~ ~N~N....(I') ....
(I') . N (I')
'"
..t!
HH
~~
(l')OOOOOOooooonoo~oooOOOOOOOOOOOOoooo
~on~ooonOOOONonNnoooooooooooooooooo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M~""(I')On~"~""M........nn""MON.n~~....noooooonno.
M---O----NNN----_O_M........MNNMOOOOO~000
(I') .... -__ ~ -~--___.mQNa_ 0
- - 0_~..._
'" ... "
... ... ...
~ I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~
'"
~ ~ ......el "'''
~ ~ ::~ e CiCi~CiCiCi~SS~~ u
~ ~>~ :~~~ ~ ~ ~~e~~~e~~~~ ~~ =
"'~ ~~2ue~~OJ ~e . ~mmmmmmeeel~ tlli:~2
~H~S.i~ "''''~ e ~~g ~~~~~~~ggaa::1 ~~~
~~Hag ~a~~~ 8~gM w~w~~ww;; oa~~~
~H~~ ~ ~ X~.... ~ ~H nnn~(I')M(I') ~~~ ~ ~
~~~~..2 ::1~~~~..~;i~7 tltltltltltltl ~~~~::1~a
~~~~~I~~i~~~~3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~gg~~~~e
lIli'l~til!1 ::10 ~~..ti~... ~:.lO"""'" oogi5
~;ui~ =~ ~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
H
..
..
B
III
t'l
....N(I').n~~~~O....N(I').n~~~ao....N(I').n~~mQOMN(I').n
........"........................MNNNNNNNNNNMM(I')(I')(I')(I')
-9-
a
o
..
1001i1i-01
"'1
,
&.J
"'1
LJ
,...,
U
"'1
U
,...,
I
I
&.J
J
J
J
1
LJ
,...,
!
,
u
r'l
LJ
,...,
J
'l '"
U
g
,..., !
I
U !:l
,..., ~ '" .,
0 ..
LJ 1 a
.. ...
., '"
.. ~r-o<o
....0 .,
.. 10'"
., ......, ~
,..., 0 a;~g
u
I .. ~
u ~ a"~:O:6
11 H 0 Q ...H (;j
.,~~~.,
J ~ .. .. .. ~
" ..
~ o<~~~~
..
.. !:!..u u .,
J
r'l
,
u
~ g I
a~
00
..~
~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo M
MOOOOOOooooo~oo~ooooooooooooooooooo M
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MO~OOOOOOOOONO~~OOOoooooooooooooooo M
M~O~O~000N~O~0NM~00000~0__000_00_0_ M
M~~ MM ~~~.N O~" O~M ~ ~
........,. 0* ............,........,.
M~ NN"m ~~ ~~M M N
...,....,. ...,....,."-"" 0"0 ...,. ~
...,. ...,....,. ...,. ...,.
~
~..
!;~
"8
00000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"OOOMOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo.oooooo
M~ ~ ONNO" ~~o O~N
~ ~"~.N n~" ONN
NC'f M....
...
n
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000N000000~~~~~~00 N
'" '"
... ...
~ ~
gE
..~
8
00000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0>
o<~
!:!~
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO M
~OOOOOOOOOOO~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~O~OOOOOOOOONO~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~
M~000~000N~0~0NM~000~00000000000000 "
M~" MM ~~~~N O~" O~~ ~ ~
....0 00 .. .. ....0 ....0
M" NN"~ ~~ ~~" M 0
0~ 00"0"" 0"0 0 ~
o 00 0 0
..
f<
~I
00000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"OOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOOOOOO~OOOOOO
M~ ~ ONNO" ~~O O~M
~ ~"~~N ~~" ON"
NN M"
...
f<!'J
....
fig:
MOOOOOOOOOOO~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MO~~OOO~OOOONO~N~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MM"MO~~"~"M""~~""ON~~~~"~ooOOOO~~O~
M~000000_NNN0000000""""NNMOOOOO~00~
M " 000 W 0000000~W~N~0 0
.. 0 0 000 ..0
'" ... ...
~ .. ~
~ I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ddddd~~d~
"
~ - ......11 ""
~ ~ ::~ ~ ~~~I~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~~~el 8 0 ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ..~
H z-~ w" 0 ~~~ ~~WMM.. H~~
~ o>~ ~""M ~ ~ ~w ~ =
"5 ~~~u~~~.. ~~ . ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiee1111 ~5 2
11"~~~igu....~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~.. ~~~
~~~~o ~~~~~ ~~gM w~wwww~ ~~aa~~~
z..~..~f:! ~~:O::O:"''' .... ~~~"''''''''''~~==~ ~ ..
~~~s~g el~~~~"~~i~7 ~~~~~~~~~~a~eel~a
~~:~ii~il"S~~~8~!~I~~~~~~~~~~~gg~~i~~ ~
~i'i~U!'l elo ~~..tii:i... ..~"......... oo~fj..
~~ui~ ~~ ~~~~g~~~~g~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
5
..
..
..
B
.,
t'l
"NM~~~~~~O"NM.n~~~~O"NM.n~~W~O"NM.n
""""""""""NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMM
-10-
10066-03
,...,
I
u
,...,
I
LJ
,...,
i
U
It
,...,
I
tJ
40'
It.
40'
If.
,...,
J
I
I
I~
I
I
221 22'
12' 12'
I
r
I
I
I
~i
I
I
11/2" PLANT MIXEr) BIT.
SURFACE 2331 "TYP.E 41
2" PLANT MIXED RIT.
BASE 2331 TYPE 31
6" CL.5 GRAVEL BASE
J
1
u
,...,
I
U
TYPICAL SECTION - SEGMENT I
,...,
I
LJ
,...,
;
u
ANTICIPATED FINISHED
GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
RANULAR BORROW
,...,
LJ
'l
L.J
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
-SELECT GRANULAR BORROW "
TYPICAL MUCK EXCAVATION SECTION
SEGMENT I
,...,
u
,...,
LJ
,...,
I
a..J
DESIGN DESIGNATION
ADT - 1000 V.P. D.
9 TON DESIGN - SOIL R FACTOR = 50 (EST.)
DESIGN SPEED - 30 MPH
NO SCALE
,...,
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
ELDORADO STREET NW/
(47TH AVENUE NW
u
J
TYPICAL
SECTIONS
1
LJ
FIGURF I
'1
L..J
'1
u
,..,
I(
301
SIDEWALK
16'
'l
J
I~
<t.
:~:
161
re.
30' ~I
a-I 1-1r-11
-, rr-- 5' SIDEWALK
u
'1
LJ
n
J
TYPICAL SECTION - SEGMENT 2
SCALE III = 151
11/2" PLANT MIXED BIT.
SURFACE 2331 TYPE 41
2" PLANT MIXED BIT.
BASE 2331 TYPE 31
6" CL. 5 GRAVEL BASE
J
'l
u
n
,
u
33' <t. 33'
t
/. 16' 161
.
I'
5' SIDEWALK
. If.
~~L[,
l 1T-5'SIDEWALK
,...,
J
'1
L..J
r:
L..J
,....,
I
TYPICAL SECTION - SEGMENT 3
SCALE ,II = 15'
/1/2" PLANT MIXED BIT.
SURFACE 2331 TYPE 41
2" PLANT MIXED BIT.
LEVELING 233/ TYPE 31
LJ
,...,
,
u
'1
LJ
'1
I
LJ
DESIGN DESIGNATION
ADT - 1000 V.P.D.
9 TON DESIGN - SOIL R FACTOR = 50 (EST.)
DESIGN SPEED - 30 MPH
n
CITY OF ANDOVER
ELDORADO STREET NW/
147TH AVENUE NW
LJ
J
TYPICAL
SECTIONS
'1
u
FIGURE 2
~
~ v v
to N
~ 0:: N
:E 0 .. 0:: r<)
a:: en I N ~
:J: [\j 0 t8 N f() N W
~ ~J- en l- f()
W .. I- 0::
enZ I 0 ~
Z ~ .:J
Wen 0 a
- Z f() (!)
~ O:EJ- - U
- U -
ZILIU :E . w l.L
Z 0 (f) w
<t~~ ciz lJ.. (f)
~ ILl . a lJ..
en J-a..o ~ ~ v a
w:Ea:: ~ ....... v
0 ~ a.. 0 0 w ,
0 J- Z U Z w
<t CI) <t w z
a::
0 :I:: W
0 I- :I:
..J lJ.. I-
W ~ a lJ..
(() V 0
, v
z 3: .......
<(
c:: Z w
<( 2:
::::>
<.:>
....
r--
J:
<(
en lJ..
u 0
-
w ~ .lN3W~3S v
::::> ,
z
w Wv 0
> t-
<( ZN
wO:: .J
J: lJ.. .JID
t- o :I: ~ <l:
r-- I-N IJ...O
V f() t-z
lJ..1- ::::>0
, o ~ 00..
Wv va
ZN ,f()
wo:: -U
ww
:I:N (f)(f) I
(f)1- I-f()
lJ..1-
zZW o ~
o=>U 0 '" )
(()a<r ~f()
z:!:D: - .
:I:~a:: 3:fd
Q~~ (f)(()
..
.. 0
~ f()
t) U
W
W (f)
(f)
lJ.. lJ..
0 0
V V
~ ~
W W
(f) (f)
W W
:I: I
l- I-
lJ..v lJ..V
ON
Ot\J v 0::
to:: ....... ..
-t\J -N
3:f() Wf()
Z..... 21-
lJ..\
o
v
,
wv
(f)N
wO::
:I: ~
I-fil
lJ..1-
o ..
v2
,
3:~ 91 I . N avo~ A1Nnop
(f)(f)
! CJ c::J EJ E3 E3 C3 E] c.J c...J c.::..J LJ c::=:J c.J C.J
lJ..
o
V
.......
~ct
wO::
:I: ..
I-fil
lL.1-
o ~
t~
-U
ww
CJ(f)b c::::J
c::::J ~