HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC January 21, 1992
'~
1'1
\--/
'~)
~
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular city Council Meeting-January 21, 1992
"
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion items
1. pinewood Estates Sketch Plan
2. The Meadows of Round Lake Street Proposal*
Staff, Committee, Commission
3. Bond Call Defeasance, Cont.
4. Platting Fees
5. PIR Discussion and Budget Adoption
6. City Hall Garage
7. Accept Park Dedication/Indian Meadows
8. Coon Creek Maintenance Project Proposal
Non-Discussion Items
9. Release Escrows/Kensington Estates 1st - 6th
10. Approve Plans/Water Trunk/Crosstown Blvd.
11. Accept Deed/Fire Station #3
12. Approve Pay Equity Implementation Report
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
*The developer has requested that Council discuss this item at
9:00 or 9:30 as he cannot be here until that time.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Januarv 21. 1992
BY:
V. Volk
~.
AGENDA SECTION. of
NQApproval Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO,
Approval of Minutes
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
January 7, 1992
Regular Meeting
/~
,
~~
r- MOTION BY
"- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
, \
I
~
.~'~,.''''''''~~'''~'''''''~
t":'~ ~\,
l \
~;f j!
'\ I
;>",/'
'''I;,
"",,,,~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
January 21, 1992
ITEM Pinewood Estates
N;. Sketch Plan
BY: Andover Review Committee
APPRO~D FOR
AGEND
BY'~
/
review the proposed sketch plan
by Chuck Cook of Continental
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
The City Council is
of Pinewood Estates
Development, Inc.
requested to
as requested
The Andover Review
and their comments
following) :
Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
are as follows (but are not limited to the
General Comments
--
1. The proposed sketch plan is located in three zoning
Districts. They are as follows: R-l, single family rural~
R-4, single family urban~ R-3, single family suburban. The
R-l and R-3 zoning districts are recommended to be rezoned
to R-4. R-4 would allow 11,400 square foot minimum lots.
2. All lots will access City streets. Alternate plan A (see
attached) is proposing one lot to access Andover Boulevard.
Ordinance 10, Section 9.02 (c) requires no lots shall be
approved wherein lots front on right-of-way of County Roads.
A copy of the sketch plan has been submitted to the Anoka
County Highway Department for their review.
3. All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06
a(l) which relates to lot size requirements. The front 100
feet shall be buildable which is a standard the City has
been using for sewer and water lots.
4. The right-of-way of street intersections shall be rounded by
a radius of not less than (20') feet. The radius for a
County Road should be at 30 feet.
COUNCIL ACTION
,r- MOTION BY
\..... TO
SECOND BY
Page Two
~
5. Lots along Hanson Boulevard and Andover Boulevard will
require a 40 foot setback. Corner lots within the plat are
required to meet Ordinance 8, Section 6.02, R-4 zoning
District regarding sideyard setbacks from street.
6. The Building Department will review to ensure the street
names are correct.
7. The ARC is recommending the two cul-de-sacs be connected to
eliminate additional snowplowing. By connecting the cul-de-
sacs the developer may be able to gain additional lots.
8. The cul-de-sac located on the west side of the plat is
recommended to be shortened to allow for a better
configuration of the lots and homes. The developer may lose
a lot with the ARC proposed configuration.
9. The ARC is recommending the proposed south access to Hanson
Boulevard be relocated across from the existing 147th Avenue
which is located on the east side of Hanson Boulevard. This
will provide a full intersection and possibly at some time
in the future warrant signals.
Q
10. If stumps are proposed to be buried, the location is to be
reviewed and approved by the Building Department.
11. The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek watershed District and any other agency that may be
interested in the site).
12. The developer is required to meet City Ordinances Band 10
and all other applicable ordinances.
Remember: This has not been studied by staff in detail as most
of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary
plat process.
Planning and zoning Commission Comments
The Planning and zoning Commission agreed with most of the items.
The Commission was concerned with the following items:
1. The lots near the power line easement along Hanson Boulevard
and the possible health hazard as well as the impact on
structures.
2. The "S" curve of 14Bth Lane to Hanson Boulevard appears to
be too close to the intersection and should be checked by
the Engineering Department.
3. Commissioners Peek, Apel and Jovanovich did not agree with
the staff recommendation to eliminate the cul-de-sacs.
o
4. Necessary sign permits should be applied for at the time of
the preliminary plat.
,,)
'0
o
,...
.-
,
~ I
~ s
,
I
.-----.-. --[
^
'I
"
.-
...
v
,..-
I,
I
I
I
~-~
~_I
,
'/
r::-.
~
()
~"2:
"
'-
r-
..,.
- ....
- ..,.
~~
<:> '
,;> ....
.......
-:'\
L
i
i
.'
,---;
[)
7'
~
~.
I -
I ..
i ~q
I
s
c
-
~
~
c:
~
..
J!
-
Co
o
~
en
eL
\d
'>
&
z
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion Item
DATE January 21, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO,
The Meadows of Round
Lake street proposal
BY: James E. Schrantz
The city Council is requested to consider a proposal
Construction Company on the Construction of Eldorado
"The Meadows of Round Lake" plat. The developer has determined
the cost of constructing the south part of Eldorado Street makes
developing the south part of the plat not feasible (see the
attached drawing). Nedegaard is proposing the following:
A. That the City construct the south 1600 feet of Eldorado street
to County Road 116. This includes the crossing of the DNR
wetland.
,
'--)
B. That the City pick up the cost of the right-of-way aquisition
for the south part of the street.
C. That the City pays for the permitting process from this point
on. (The developer has spent about $10,000 to date on the
review of the wetland permitting process per their estimate.)
The estimated costs are as follows:
Permit process and Legal consultant
$330,000.00
$50,000.00
$20,000.00
street construction for the 1600 feet
Right-of-way
Estimated Total Cost
$400,000.00
We are checking with state Aid to see if Eldorado Street could be
a state Aid street if the Council so desires.
The attached drawing shows how we could revise the MSA Street
designation by revoking the section east of Eldorado street to
Round Lake Boulevard and then designate south on Eldorado street
to County Road 116. We may have to designate west from Eldorado
Street to 7th Avenue because County Road 116 is not a County
state Aid street.
COUNCIL ACTION
r- MOTION BY
~ TO
SECOND BY
:J
, \
'0
o
I -
~~
~
COUNTY ROAD NO, 116
N
m
X
I
OJ
-l
U1
I I
I I~
I I ~
I I (J)
I :-i
I I
I I
Lt:fr'L_
l r-
I I~
I Ig
I I~
Ul
:-i
-I
:c
t> ~ ITl
(') 2 3:
0 ~ ITl
3: -0 ,_r
3: ::0 3:- ::>
ITl 0 -0-1 0
en ::0 '- ::0-< 0
2 -I ITl :::
9 ::0 (') 0::>
ITl 3: -I <2 en
- ITl 2 ~O 0
0 (!)
0 -I 2 1Tl(fl "T1
Q) en ITl I
Q) (fl ~ 2-1 ::0
-1::0 0
I 0 C
0 ~ ITl
- ~ Z
0'
r
::>
^
ITl
, :~ '1
f: ?~'II "1....
\, (
~
;CJLt" '"'' "
'~r "]
..-r<'I~
l'
~t
,)':
,!
r.ll'\ .
"\..
, ~'i::'!2~~:':~
'--""":..i/I i
,..:,'~}\")-~,:.
'~\:~::;~:~,:, :>
('.: .
,'i.':..
~l~~
/(~'.J~~+,..~<.~
"'COON
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
staff, Committee Comm.
ITEM Bond Call/Defeasance
NO,
-3. Continued
Finance
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Howard D. Koolick~\?-
BY: Finance Di rector
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the information
from springsted Inc. and Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc.
regarding the call, defeasance and refunding of two of the City'S
bond issues and provide direction regarding this matter.
BACKGROUND
Springsted Inc. made a presentation last meeting regarding the
refunding and defeasance of two bond issues. The City Council
continued the item to this meeting to allow Jim casserly the
opportunity to review the issues and prepare a recommenda~ion.
~_ The recommendations from Casserly Molzahn & Associates and an
updated recommendation from Springsted will be supplied at the
meeting.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Adopt the attached resolution providing for the issuance and
sale of $1,115,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series
1992A with Springsted.
2. Adopt a resolution (which will be handed out at the meeting)
providing for the issuance and sale of $1,115,000 General
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A with Casserly
Molzahn.
3. Do not adopt the resolution thereby indicating the City
Council's decision to not refund or defease either bond issue.
COUNCIL ACTION
,- MOTION BY
"-- TO
SECOND BY
'\
'J
Extract of Minutes of Meeting
of the City Council of the City
of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the
City on Tuesday, January 7,1992, commencing at P.M.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
***
***
***
The following resolution was presented by Councilmember
~J who moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF $1,115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992A
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Andover, Anoka County,
Minnesota (City) as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that:
(a) the City is authorized by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475 (Act) and Section 475.67, Subdivision 13 of the Act to issue and
sell its general obligation bonds to refund outstanding bonds when determined
by the City Council to be necessary and desirable;
(b) it is necessary and desirable that the City issue $1,115,000
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A (Bonds) to refund in
advance of maturity and at their redemption date, certain outstanding general
obligations of the City;
()
SNG26948
AN165-9
"-
'J
;~J
"
\._./
(c) the outstanding bonds to be refunded (Refunded Bonds) consist
of the $2,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1985A, dated
August 1, 1985, of which $815,000 in principal amount is callable August 1,
1995; and $1,795,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1986A,
dated July 1, 1986, of which $695,000 in principal amount is callable on August
1, 1996.
"
2. To provide moneys to refund in advance of maturity the Refunded
Bonds, the City will therefor issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $1,103,850. In
order to provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this
time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $11,150. The excess of the
purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $1,103,850 will be credited to the debt
service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on
such additional Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued, sold and delivered in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the following Terms of Proposal:
SNG26948
AN165-9
:J
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORA1ED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
"
,
$1,115,000.
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONOS, SERIES 1992A
Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City's Finance Director or his designee on
Tuesday, February 4, 1992, until 11 :30 A.M" Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED
Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they
will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council
at 7:30 P.M., Central Time. of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
.--,
,J
The Bonds will be dated March 1, 1992, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1992. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, The Bonds will be
issued In the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as requested by the
purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main
corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of
the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the
books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding
month.
The Bonds will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as foliows:
1996 $205,000
1997 $270,000
1998 $245,000
1999 $220,000
2000 $155,000
2001 $ 20,000
.
The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and pflor to award, to increase or reduce the
principaJ amount of the Bonds offered for sale, Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $40,000 and wiil be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maruflties, In the
event the prmcipal amount of the Bonds Is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to ttU3 percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced,
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
, The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge Its full faith and
credit and power 10 levy direct general ad valorem taxes, In addition the City will pledge
special assessments against benefited property, The proceeds will be used to refund in
advance of their stated maturities all of the bonds maturing in the years 1996-2000 of the City's
$2,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1985A, dated August 1, 1985, and
, " all of the bonds maturing in the years 1997-2001 of the City's $1,795,000 General Obligation
\_.J Improvement Bonds, Series 1986A, dated July 1, 19as.
- i .
" ')
\ ~
,::)
/ -....
\...._)
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $1,103,850 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") In
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond In the amount of $11,150,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond Is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals, The Financial Surety Bond
must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If
the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Sprlngsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M.,
Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by
that time, the Financial Suroty Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit
requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be
deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the CIty. No
proposal, can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in Integral
multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be In ascending order. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted,
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest dollar Interest cost to be determined by
the deduction of the premium, if any, from. or the addition of any amount less than par. to the
total dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each proposal, in accordance with customary
practice, will be controlling.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations, The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constltute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds, The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP Identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser,
SETILEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Holmes & Graven,
Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of
customary closing papers, including a no-litigation certificate, On the date of settlement
payment for the Bonds shall be made In federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at
the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as
compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by
-Ii .
. "
. I
.~
o
o
action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by
the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authori2ed the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly-final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 1502-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Sprlngsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 1 00, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 1502-12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 40 copies of the
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Sonds are awarded as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (Ii) it shall enter Into a
contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of
assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated January 7, 1992
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Isl Vicki Volk
City Clerk
. Iii .
: \,
'-J
CJ
()
3. Springsted Incorporated is authorized and directed to negotiate the
Bonds for sale in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council
will meet at 7: 30 p. m. on Tuesday, February 4, 1992, to consider bids on the Bonds
and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seco'nded by
Councilmember
, and upon vote being taken thereon the following
members voted in favor of the motion:
and the following voted against:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
SNG26948
AN165-9
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA )
~J )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
)
CITY OF ANDOVER )
"
r- ''\
'---.)
o
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City
of Andover, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached
and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
held on Tuesday, January 7, 1992, with the original minutes on file in my office and
the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to
the issuance and sale of $1,115,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series
1992A of the City.
WITNESS My hand as City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this_
day of
, 1992.
City Clerk
City of Andover, Minnesota
(SEAL)
SNG2694B
AN165-9
~"'j~;"'<r,~
li'(}\;"""""\
'1 ~
, "\ l . ,Ii
'J " ,/
"-"
~~-.,..
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE Januar
ITEM
NO.
1./.
Approve Platting
Application & Fees
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT '\)
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
AGENDAS~~~~?Ncommittee,
NO. ..
Commlsslon
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review and approve the attached
Platting Application and fees. The changes to the application are
to cover the costs the City incurs during the platting process and
includes such costs as the review by the attorney, engineering
reports, site inspections, signs, etc.
The changes to the application can be found under Subdivision
Filing Requirements, item No.5. The filing fee of $40.00 and the
fee per acre of $7.50 are currently used. The $500.00 Plat Escrow
Deposit has been removed and replaced by a Plat Escrow Deposit
based on a per lot basis depending upon the type of plat (urban or
rural) .
'-
Note: The proposed fee changes are a result of calculations from
recent plats and the costs incurred in the platting
process.
The Council is asked to approve the attached Preliminary Plat
Application and resolution.
, ,
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~I
o
CA
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
street Location of property:
Legal Description of Property:
Property Owner:
Address:
Phone:
Applicant:
Address:
Description of Request:
phone:
o
Rezoning Request Required: YES [
NO [
Explain:
Fee:
(Signature of Applicant)
Date Paid:
Receipt No.:
(Signature of property Owner)
(Date)
o
o
u
o
REQUIREMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
PROCEDURES
Pre-Application Requirements
Prior to the preparation of a preliminary plat, the subdividers or
owners shall meet with the City Planner and City Engineer to
review all applicable ordinances, regulations, and plans in the
area to be subdivided. At this time, or at subsequent informal
meetings, the subdivider shall submit a general development plan
and drainage plan. The general development plan may be presented
in a simple form, but should include any zoning changes which
would be required and show that consideration has been given to
the relationship of the proposed subdivision to existing community
facilities that would serve it to neighboring subdivision and
development, and to the topography or the site.
subdivision Filing Requirements
After the pre-application meeting, the subdivider shall file this
application along with the following information:
1. Copies of preliminary plat, as needed, complete with data
described in Ordinance No.8 (Zoning Ordinance) and Ordinance
No. 10 (Subdivision & Platting Ordinance) and all other
applicable Ordinances.
2. Complete and accurate list of all property owners and
addresses of record within 350 feet of the exterior boundaries
of the proposed plat.
3. Abstract of title, or registered property abstract, certified
to date covering the premises to be divided.
4. If the property is not zoned for the proposed use, a petition
for rezoning to the precise intended use shall be submitted to
the Planning and zoning Commission.
5.
AMOUNT
$ 40.00
7.50
50.00
375.00
10.00
15.00
FEES
Filing
Fee Per Acre
Plat Escrow Deposit
Urban plat/Per Lot
Rural Plat/Per Lot
Topographical Map/Per Acre
Final Plat Fee
The fees indicated above shall cover such costs as review by
the attorney, engineering reports, site inspections, signs,
etc. Fees must be paid before item will be placed on the
Planning Commission agenda. Additional plat escrow fees may
be required as development proceeds toward completion.
A public hearing at a Planning & zoning Commission meeting shall
be arranged within thirty days (30) from the date of application.
Public hearing notice published at least ten (10) days before the
:~ Planning & zoning Commission meeting at which time the item will
'-/ be heard. Notices are sent to area residents within a radius of
350 feet of the subject property to notify them of the meeting
date.
Review and report by the City Engineer forwarded to the Planning &
zoning Commission and applicant one (1) week prior to the hearing.
preliminary Plat is placed on City Council agenda. Inform
applicant of the City Council action. If request is granted,
provide applicant with a copy of the resolution stating the
conditions upon which approval is granted. If denied, provide
applicant an explanation of the basis of denial.
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the
information and material submitted with this application is complete
and accurate per City ordinance and policy requirements. I understand
that only complete applications will be scheduled for an appropriate
Planning Commission meeting. I understand that the application will
be processed in sequence with respect to other submittals.
Applicant's Signature Date
r-,\
~
Application Approved by Date
o
'\
"~
"
~J
~- '\
'--)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 179-91 AND ESTABLISHING
THE FOLLOWING PLATTING FEES.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following fees are hereby established for the year 1992:
Type of Fee
plat Fees
preliminary Plat Filing Fee
Preliminary plat per acre fee
Final Plat Fee
Plat Escrow Deposit
Urban Lot per acre
Rural Lot per acre
Fee
$ 40.00
7.50
15.00
50.00
375.00
10.00
Topographical Map
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 21st
day of January, 1992
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST
victoria Volk, City Clerk
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
~""~""'_'Ir"~.
'''CA'~'' ...."'\...
.l "',.
~~-
~ L
U -~
'J ~
:_) \.. ....j'...i
~'"
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
January 21, 1992
.....
staff, Committee, Comm.
Finance
Howard D. Koolick ~
BY: Finance Director
AP,':~\Eb FOR
AG'C~
BY: I
J
ITEM
NO.
.J\.
PIR Discussion and
Budget Adoption
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the attached
information regarding the PIR Fund, provide direction and if
applicable, adopt the attached resolutions:
1. A resolution closing the 1980A Improvement Bond Debt
Service Fund and the 1986A Refunding Bond Debt Service
Fund into the PIR Fund.
2. A resolution amending the 1992 PIR Fund budget.
BACKGROUND
,~
At the previous meeting, the City Council requested research be
done regarding the PIR Fund. Attached you will find the following
information:
1. Resolution establishing the PIR Fund.
2. Minutes from March 5, 1990 where the above resolution was
discussed and amended.
3. Minutes from the October 16, 1990 and November 20, 1990
meeting where the 1978 Bond Fund was closed.
4. A history of the PIR Fund from its inception to December
31, 1991.
COUNCIL ACTION
/,
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
, .
'-'
:_)
Based on the discussion from the previous meeting, there are three
issues that require city council attention.
1. what was the intent of the city council concerning the
use of the 1978 Bond funds and should they be used to
refurbish 4881?
2. What should be included in the 1992 budget for the PIR
Fund?
3. How should the funds remaining in the 1980A Improvement
Bond and the 1986A Refunding Bond Debt Service Funds be
allocated to the PIR Fund?
Each of these items is discussed in more detail below.
What was the intent
1 78 Bond funds an
of the
Attached are the minutes from the October 16, 1990 and November
20, 1990 meetings were this topic was discussed. The City council
will need to determine from these minutes what their intent was.
c=) what should be included in the 1992 budget for the PIR Fund?
On November 21, 1991, the City council adopted the following 1992
PIR Budget:
Revenue:
Special Assessments
Interest Earnings
Total
$119,000
55,000
$174,000
Expenditures:
voting Booths
Minor Fire Equipment
Total
$ 11,298
10,700
$ 21,998
On December 17, 1991, the City council approved the construction
of a wall within the public works building at a cost not to exceed
$3,500. The budget will need to be amended to include this item.
In addition, department heads have made me aware of the following
two items that they would like included in the PIR budget:
Refurbishing of 4881
Construction of Garage at City
Hall for storage of Vehicles.
$35,000
$22,000
, "
'-~
-~J
The refurbishing of 4881 was discussed at the previous meeting and
earlier in this item. The garage is schedule to be discussed
later in the meeting, however, the building official will be
present to answer any questions.
Included with your information is a resolution amending the PIR
budget that you will need to adopt. All of the above have been
included on the resolution. City Council will need to delete any
that it does not approve.
in the
Serv~ce
Both the 1980A Improvement Bonds and the 1986A Refunding Bonds
had there final maturities in 1991. As of December 31, 1991,
the 1980A Bonds has $4,786.86 plus interest while the 1986A
Refunding Bonds has $66,991.77 plus interest. In addition, there
are deferred assessments pledged to the 1980A Bond.
o
The resolution establishing the PIR Fund requires these monies to
be deposited into the PIR Fund. The City Council must decide how
the money should be allocated between the Public Improvement
Account and the Capital Improvement Account.
Just for your information, the next year that the City may have
funds to deposit in the PIR fund would be in 1995 when the 1979
bonds reach final maturity.
Included in your information is a resolution to approve once the
amounts for each account have been determined.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Adopt the resolution amending the PIR budget after inserting
or deleting amounts.
OR
Table adoption of the resolution pending more information from
Staff.
2. Adopt the resolution closing the 1980A Improvement Bond Fund
and the 1986A Refunding Bond Fund and transferring the
remaining funds to the PIR Fund after inserting the proper
amounts into the resolution.
OR
Table adoption of the resolution pending more information from
staff .
r~
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING
FUND BUDGET.
WHEREAS, Resolution Number R74-90 established a Permanent
Improvement Revolving Fund, prescribed its allowable uses and
sources of revenues and requires the preparation of an annual
budget: and
WHEREAS, the original budget adopted as part of Resolution
Number R190-91 did not include all expenditures which the City
Council deemed necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby amends the 1992 Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund budget to include the following additional
expenditures:
Construction of a Wall within
the Public works Building
Refurbishing of Truck 4881
Construction of Garage at City Hall
$ 3,500
$ 35,000
$ 22,000
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
day of January , 1992.
21st
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
~
u
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
-92
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION CLOSING THE 1980A IMPROVEMENT BOND FUND AND THE 1986A
REFUNDING BOND FUND AND TRANSFERRING THE REMAINING FUNDS TO THE
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND.
WHEREAS, the City of Andover issued bonds for a variety of
public improvements in 1980 and issued refunding bonds in 1986 to
refinance bonds issued in 1981 for public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover has repaid all obligations
arising under these bonds and there are monies remaining in the
funds reserved for the payment of the debt; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover has adopted
Resolution No, R074-90 which established the Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund and requires these monies be deposited into this
fund.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover that, as of December 31, 1991, the 1980A
Improvement Bond Fund and the 1986A Refunding Bond Fund are hereby
closed.
BE
funds be
with $
$
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all monies remaining in these
deposited into the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund
allocated to the Public Improvement Account and
allocated to the capital Improvement Account.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
the City Council on this 21st day of
Councilmembers
and adopted by
January , 1992, with
voting in favor of the resolution, and councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. orttel - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
C)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. 074 -90
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
REVOLVING FUND OF THE CITY: ESTABLISHING
THE FUND: DESIGNATING THE USES THEREOF: AND
PROVIDING FOR ITS MAINTENANCE
I.
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of
Andover (City) as follows:
Section 1. Backqround: Findinqs.
1.01 The City has issued and sold various series of
general obligation bonds to finance the cost of various public
improvements and other items of a capital nature, which bonds
are now outstanding.
1.02 The city has called for redemption and prepayment
on February 1 (Redemption Date) the following series of bonds
(collectively the Redeemed Bonds):
a) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976, Series
1976A;
b) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976, Series
1976B;
0 c) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1977 ; and
d) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1980.
1.03 On the Redemption Date there will be available in
the debt service funds for the Redeemed Bonds monies not needed
for payment of the Redeemed Bonds, which funds are surplus funds
within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61,
Subdivision 4, and may be used for any authorized municipal
purpose.
1.04 There exist now and there is anticipated to exist
in the future balances in the debt service funds for various
bonds of the City which are or are anticipated to be in excess
of the amounts needed to pay the principal of and interest on
those bonds and which amounts are or will constitute surplus
funds.
1.05 The City lis authorized by Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 412 and 475 and Section 429.091, Subdivision 7A
(collectively, the Act) to establish a revolving fund to finance
the costs of any assessable public improvement or any utility
described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and 115.46, and
to establish such other funds as it deems desirable.
o
-1-
:J
1.06 The City Council finds and determines that it is
necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the
City to establish a Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund as
authorized by the Act to efficiently and economically finance
various capital improvements in the City and to utilize for
authorized municipal purposes .the surpluses described above.
Section 2. PIR Fund Established: Sources: Uses.
2.01 There is established as a fund of the City the
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR Fund).
2.02 The following monies are to be paid into the PIR
Fund:
a) balances in the respective debt service funds for
the Redeemed Bonds remaining after the Redeemed
Bonds have been redeemed and paid;
o
b) balances remaining in any construction fund or debt
service fund established for an assessable public
improvement under Section 429.091, Subd. 4 of the
Act when (i) all bonds or other obligations payable
from that construction or debt service fund have
been redeemed, paid or defeased and (ii) anticipated
collections of special assessments and other
revenues pledged to a debt service fund for an
assessable public improvement are estimated by "the
City Treasurer to be adequate to produce at least 5%
in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the
principal and interest payments on bonds issued to
finance the improvements for which the fund was
established;
I'
c) balances remaining in a debt service fund for any
other general obligation bonds of the City when
those bonds have been redeemed, paid or defeasedi
d) proceeds of any bonds or other obligations issued by
the City pursuant to Section 429.091, Subd. 7 of the
Act; and
e) any other monies appropriated to the PIR Fund by the
City Council from time to time.
the
and
2.03
provisions
no other:
;
Monies in the PIR Fund are to be used, subject to
of this resolution, for the following purposes
a) the temporary or permanent financing of the cost of
assessable public improvements under Chapter 429 of
the Act;
o
-2-
RegulaL City Council Meeting
March 6, 1990 - Minutes
/-, Page 5
'-~
(1988 CDBG Discussion, Continued)
AfteL some discussion, Council asked that the Staff PLioLitize the
aLeas of blighted pLopeLty fOL possible acquisition and begin
contacting the owneLS. ML. Blake was also asked to check into any
blighted aLeas that couid be consideLed along BunkeL Lake BoulevaLd.
He is also to check into pLices and begin bidding fOL the items
Lequested fOL the SenioL Citizen CenteL impLovements. The item is to
be placed on the MaLch 20 Agenda fOL fULtheL consideLation.
KENSINGTON ESTATES 5TH/IP90-5/CITY COSTS
ML. Davidson Leviewed his FebLuaLY 23, 1990, letteL to the Council
LegaLding the City's costs fOL connection fLom Kensington Estates 5th
Addition to stLeets and utilities at Raven and Nightingale StLeets.
The City's cost to connect to existing sanitaLY and stoLm seweLS at
Raven StLeet is $1,200. The costs to connect Nightingale StLeet and
utlities to Kensington 5th Addition is about $6,000. He suggested the
funds come fLom pLevious stLeet and seweL pLojects in Red Oaks if
theLe aLe funds in theLe. ML. Koolick believed those aLe the bonds
that aLe being Lecalled and is paLt of the $400,000 that wil I be put
in a Levolving fund.
i \
',-)
Council gave veLbal agLeement to the pLoposals.
FEASIBILITY REPORT/IP90-5
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by OLttel, the Lesolution accepting the
feasibility study, waiving public heaLing, oLdeLing impLovement and
dILectIng pLepaLation of plans and specIficatIons fOL the improvement
of Project 90-5 fOL watermain, sanitary sewer, storm drain and street
with concrete curb and gutter in Hidden Creek East 3rd Addition as
presented. (See Resolution R030-90) Motion carried unanimously.
ESTABLISH PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND
AttoLney Hawkins explained how the fund is set up and how it can be
used. Because the vast majority of the surplus funds came from the
bonds on sewer and water projects, he strongly felt they should only
be used for financing future sewer and water improvements such as to
help offset portions of the util ity systems that cost more than what
can be assessed. Fund A would be used solely for those purposes, any
429 project; and he noted that in the future he will be Lecommending
al I bonding revenues be pooled into Fund A with that money used fOL
debt seLvice.
~-)
,-- '\
'-J
b) the temporary or permanent financing of the costs of
water, sewer or storm sewer utilities described in
Section 444.075 and 115.46 of the Act;
c) loans to other City funds for any purpose other than
operating expense; and
d) other lawful municipal purposes as authorized in
this resolution.
Section 3. PIR Fund: Accounts.
3.01 There are to be maintained in the PIR Fund the
following accounts:
o
a) The publ ic Improvement Account. Monies in this
account are to be used to finance the costs of
assessable public improvements and water, sewer and
storm sewer utilities described in Section 444.075
and 115.46 of the Act. Into this account are to be
paid (i) all special assessments, interest thereon,
and prepayments thereof, levied for such improve-
ments, (ii) revenues of the utility so financed and
(iii) the proceeds of bonds or other obligations
issued to finance the public improvements described
herein and payable from debt service accounts in the
PIR Fund. The City Treasurer must establish sub-
accounts within the account for each public improve-
ment so financed. Any expenditures or transfers
from this account which are not to be fully
recovered by special assessments shall require a
four-fifths vote of the City Council. The initial
balance in this account is $ 417,758.93 plus 1Q90 interest
and special assessment collections.
b) The Capital Improvement Account. Monies in this
account may be loaned or transferred to other City
funds for any corporate purpose other than operating
expense. No money may be loaned or transferred from
this account except upon four-fifth vote approving
same by the City Council. The initial balance in
this account is $50,000.00.
c) The Surplus Account. Monies in this
used for any/ authorized corporate
initial balance in this account is $
account may be
purpose. The
-0-
Section 4. Procedures: APpropriations.
4.01 Loans, expenditures and transfers from the PIR
Fund must be authorized by Council resolution.
C)
-3-
4.02 The debt service balances of the Redeemed Bonds
F\ remaining after the payment are appropriated to the accounts in
~~ the PIR Fund in the respective amounts indicated in section 3.
other deposits of monies to the PIR Fund must be authorized by
Council resolution.
4.03 The Finance Director shall prepare and submit to
the Council a proposed budget for the PIR Fund, together with
the recommendations of the City Administrator for the use of the
PIR Fund in the next ensuing year.
4.04 Nothing in this Resolution is to be construed as
limiting the discretion of the city council in financing
assessable public improvements or other public improvements
pursuant to any provision of law or this Resolution_
Adopted by the City ~ouncil of the city of Andover this 5th
day of June 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~_) ATTEST:
~i&
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,- "
,
,_.J
Regular City Council Meeting
March 6, 1990 - Minutes
r , Page 6
,)
<Establ ish Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, Continued)
Mr. Hawkins explained that Fund B provides more flexibility, and the
funds can be used for other improvements or capital expenditures. His
only hesitency in putting the money in Fund B is it requires
discipline in using them because there could be a lot of political
pressure to spend those funds on various items. Mr. Hawkins felt to
require an extra-ordinary majority to spend those funds is
permissible.
Councii discussed the functions of the three funds and in which funds
the bond proceeds should be deposited. A suggestion was to require a
4/5 vote on the use of those funds in Fund B which are susceptible to
political pressure to be used as a revolving fund for maintenance-type
projects, road improvements, etc. ,A concern raised by Councilmember
Knight was the costs involved to resurface streets, thinking the
residents would not be willing to be reassessed for that cost. No
decision was made on that issue.
')
'-
Attorney Hawkins advised that the funds from the Capital Improvement
Fund can only be used for capital items. Council felt the majority of
the bond surplus should be put in Fund A to be used when needed for
assistance on assessable projects.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, that we have the Attorney
and Staff redraft this document to place under Section B, the Capital
Improvement Account, the amount of $50,000, and under Section A,
Public Improvement Account, the remainder of the monies we are
discussing here; and that the language be put in this document to
require a 4/5 vote of the Council to either change these documents
or to expend money out of either of these accounts. Motion carried
unanimously.
LOWER RUM RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION/WATER QUALITY FEEDBACK
Council suggested the management of water resources within the Lower
Rum River Watershed be sent to the P & Z to incorporate in the City's
ordinance, which would eliminate the work of the LRRWMO. Mr. Schrantz
stated once it is approved, the water qua] lty program and regulations
wil I be sent back to the Cities for incorporation into their
ordinances. He also explained the City has control over the
Organization's budget because it is included in the City's budget.
C)
In discussing the funding of the organization, Council questioned what
the cost would be to the property owners within the LRRW district,
recognizing it would become another taxing district and would be set
up by the county. Council asked for a budget estimating the costs of
the LRRWMO and the costs to Andover residents and to place the item on
another Agenda for further consideration.
RegulaL City Council Meeting
OctobeL 16, 1990 - Minutes
,r, Page 6
o
(South Coon CLeek DLive Sidewalk to PaLk, Continued)
"
Council then agLeed the sidewalk should be put in such that as many
tLees as possible would be saved, possibly weaving the sidewalk within
the easement OL moving it closeL to the cULb to accomplish it. A
tentative plan is to be bLought back to the Council at the NovembeL 6
meeting.
APPOINT ACCOUNTING FIRM
ML. Koolick Leviewed the quotes Leceived fLom two accounting fiLms to
peLfoLm the City's audit. He was employed with the fiLm of Pannell
KeLL FOLsteL pLioL to coming to,AndoveL, though he said he left on
veLY good teLms. He also felt the additional documentation pLoposed
by the fiLm of Voto, Tautges, and Redpath can be done in-house quite
eas i i y .
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by PeLLY, that we appoint the accounting
fiLm of Pannell KeLL FOLsteL to be OUL official accounting fiLm fOL
the yeaLs 1990-1992 fOL the amounts that aLe shown heLe. <ThLee-yeaL
engagement to do the City's Audit -- 1990, $12,000; 1991, $12,500; and
1992, $13,000) Motion caLLied unanimously.
u
SCHEDULE MEETING/CANVASS ELECTION RESULTS
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, that we set a meeting fOL 7
o'clock on ThuLsday, NovembeL 8, to conduct a canvass of the election
Lesults. Motion caLLied unanimously.
KIRBY ESTATES ESCROW REFUND
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by PeLLY, a Resolution appLoving the
final gLading of KiLby Estates as being developed by Wayne and Kay
Olson in Section 34-32-24. (See Resolution R149-90) Motion caLLied
on a 4-Yes, 1-No <Jacobson, as he'd LatheL have an engineeLing fiLm
appLove the final gLading) vote~
I
/
CLOSE 1978 BOND FUND
ML. Koolick explained the final bond payment was made on the GO Bonds
of 1978 fOL fiLefighting equipment and the public seLvices building.
The balance plus inteLest to the end of the yeaL should leave a
balance of about $120,000. This balance must be deposited in the PIR
Fund peL Resolution R74-90, in eitheL the Public ImpLovement Account
c=) OL the Capital ImpLovement Account.
Regular Cit"y Council Meeting
October 16, 1990 - Minutes
Page 7
o
<Close 1978 Bond Fund, Continued)
"
Council generally felt that it would logically be placed In the
Capital Improvement Fund to be used for purchasing equipment since the
bond was purchased for public safety Improvements. The need for funds
for diseased tree removal and the WDE Site was also raised. Mr.
Koollck stated he will be presenting a budget for the PIR Fund for
Council consideratIon, and the funds can be earmarked at that tIme.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, the Resolution as presented
with the following numbers inserted in the blank: zero dollars
allocated to the Public Improvement Account and $111,358.21 plus
accrued interest for 1990 allocated to the Capital Improvement
Account. <See Resolution R150-90) Motion carrIed unanimously.
APPROVE BOND SALE
(j
Attorney Hawkins revIewed hIs October 3, 1990, letter on his
recommendation to re-Issue $1,550,000 General OblIgation Temporary
Improvement Bonds 1987B. The majority of those funds were used to
finance the improvements of the Commercial Park plus several
developments. The alternatives are to roll it over one more tIme in a
temporary issue or to issue a long-term General Obligation bond.
Under the circumstances, he felt it would be most beneficial to issue
temporary bonds again, because in all liklihood the receipt of tax
increment collections, county payments, and special assessment
receipts will be sufficient within the next two to three years to pay
off all or most of the bond.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that we authorize the City
Attorney and Mayor to take all the steps necessary for the issuance of
three-year Temporary General Obligation Improvement Bonds in the
amount of $1,550,000 to refinance General Obligation Temporary
Improvmeent Bond Series 1987B. <See Resolution ~151-90) Motion
carried unanimously.
WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT ESCROW REFUNDS
MOTION by Knight, Seconded bY! Jacobson, that we return the escrow
amounts in the amount of $1,336.06 to Woodland Development as
enumerated here. Motion carried unanimously.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT/FISCAL DISPARITIES
o
Mayor Elling noted the letter from the Mayor of Blaine on retaining
Charlie Weaver to represent the cities on the fIscal disparitIes
Issues during the 1991 Legislative Session. Council briefly discussed
the agremeent, but questioned where the funds would come from as It
was not In the approved 1991 budget.
:-J
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - November 20, 1990
Page 9
(Rural Density Policy Update, Continued)
a requirement for financing in the rural area. However, they are
looking at other restrictions such as requiring an environmental
review done by the Metropolitan Council and that each City submitting
plats for FHA financing have a plan consIstent wIth Metropolitan
Council polIcIes. Neither one of those are within the jurisdIctIons
of the FHA and HUD, so the entire matter is not yet resolved.
Ms. Bosell went on to say the general consensus of those speaking at
the meetings was to leave the jurisdiction with the local unit of
government, and don't pull into play other requIrements and
jurisdictIons that don't belong to the MetropolItan CouncIl. However,
they are not lookIng to change the 1/10, 4/40 policy at this time but
may impose some addItional rules. Another point brought up is they
are mandating polIcies that have fInancial Implications but are not
providing the dollars for them. She felt the City needs to continue
following this issue, stating she will continue to monitor it. She
also suggested contInuIng to contact State and Federal elected
officials to inform them of what is happening with regard to this
policy. At this tIme It doesn't give the ComprehensIve Plan Task
Force any direction, as the soonest the MDIF Plan would be amended Is
1991. No action was taken by the Council.
~J
LICENSE RENEWALS
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Perry, that the CouncIl approve a
Cigarette and Intoxicating Off-Sale Liquor license to G-Will Liquors;
Non-Intoxicating On-Sale Liquor license to Woodland Creek Golf Course;
CIgarette and IntoxIcating Off-Sale Liquor license to J J's Liquor:
CIgarette licenses to FestIval Foods, Bra-Midwest Vending; and
Cigarette and Non-Intoxciating Off-sale LIquor licenses to Tom Thumb
Store #355, Bill's Superette, Andover Superamerica, and Brooks Food
Market #54. Motion carried on a 3-Yes, 1-No (Jacobson is amazed
that these licenses are stll I issued that permIts and legalizes
cigarettes and liquor which are two of the country's largest
health-related problems.), 1-Absent (EI ling) vote.
PUBLIC WORKS/FIRE DEPARTMENT EXCESS FUNDS/PIR BUDGET
Bob Peach, Firefighter, requested the CouncIl consider some of the
approximately $120,000 In funds overcollected from the first public
safety bond to be spent on the Fire Department. The first item is to
move the NE Station from its present location to what Is now called
the Cold Storage BuildIng. The modifIcatIon of the bui lding Is
estImated to cost $50,000. The FIre Chief, Mr. Stone and several
others met to determIne the best method of adjustIng to the move to
the MaIn FIre StatIon. It was determined that splitting the existing
8
~J
"
'\
'- )
o
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - November 20. 1990
Page 10
(Public Woeks/Fiee Department Excess Funds/PIR Budget, Continued)
fiee station space between the Fiee Depaetment and Public Woeks
ceeates a numbee of peoblems including a zig-zag wall to ceeate the
needed numbee of bays foe each department. access. dirt and
contamination. shared space, heating and draining. At this time they
are asking that the funds be set aside for the remodeling of the Cold
Storage Building, which wouldn't need to be done until next speing.
In further discussion with the Council. Me. Peach pointed out that the
net cost is considerably less than $50.000 because a wall would not
have to be built at the present fire station and Mr. Stone had
intended to make improvements to the Cold Storage Building in the foem
of flooring and heating. Mr. Stone also stated he felt it is time to
sepaeate the two depaetments. Because the item came up so fast, they
really haven't had time to look into detailed costs. They understand
the PIR Fund budget is going to be approved and they are looking to
have the funds budgeted.
Mr. Peach pointed out another need foe the funds is to repair their
primary pumper. #4881 for an estimated cost of $40,000. Mr. Stone
also asked to repair the outside walls of the Public Works/Fire
Department building. He has received a quote for $17,000, asking that
this also be budgeted from the PIR fund.
Because none of the items will be done before next spring and Me.
Koolick stated the Council does not have to approve the PIR budget at
this time, Council agreed to table the item until some time before
Spring, 1991.
APPROVE RESOLUTION EXPENDING PIR FUNDS
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, authorizing the expenditure
of $5,150 from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to complete
the upgrading of the City's underground fuel storage tanks, Resolution
labeled R164-90. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 1-Absent (Elling) vote.
AUTHORIZE PURCHASE/PORTABLE PIPELINE INSPECTION ~{STEM
Mr. Stone reviewed the bids presented in the Agenda material.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that the City Council award
the bid to Aries Indust~ies, Inc., for a black and white mini-camera
and video tape recorder for monitoring and televising sanitary sewer
lines and service lines, in the amount of $11,193: and we also
recognize the bid from Buchen S.I.S., Inc., for $12,492: and note that
this is a budgeted item in the 1990 budget. Motion carried on a
4-Yes, 1-Absent (EI ling) vote.
0 M d "- 1'1 0 0 d 0 M 1'1 I CO CO lil
0 M '1 OJ lil 0 111 h1 0 <t OJ I OJ (\J ~
...: en oj , r:n I
0 1'1 ~ 0 N ai .; I CO en
0 lil lil "- 0 en h1 lil ~ ~ I I" 111 1'1
- <t ~ <t ~ 111 .. .. CO en col CO <t "1
III .. 0 .. I II Iii (,J . I ul ,:
.., I g] lil ~ I col
0 OJ lil .. .. .. <t1 en (oj
t- ~ lil I I I ..I lil ..
.. .. I ..
1'1 (0 111 0 0 0 0 M "-
M CO ~ 0 111 111 0 <t h1
t ,.j "- ...: 0 oj N en CO h1
lil ~ CO 0 en h1 lil ~ lil
III " ~ ~ (\J h1 .. l CO en ~
.., " .. 0 .: I Iii J
'" 0 0 h1
a. (j (0 "- .. .. .. h1
'1l' (j ~ ~ I I I ~
U 0: .. .. ..
Ul
."
s.. Ul 0 111 CO M ~
III >. 0 " <t <t (\j "-
>~ 0 ai I
o III 1'1 <t (\J
u" (j .., 0 <t en ~ ~ 01
,,0: '" " <t h M CO CO "-
0: - " .. ~ .. Iii crr en
0 u .0 0 I <t 1IlCl)
... " " (j en <t <t ~J
o " a. (j l <t .. h1
Ii. q: .. ..
>. ~9
..,0::
'" .... '~ ~
uo. u
..,..,
" 1Il'1l ,
;;J >~l ~'l
Ii. ~ rn ..
s: " ." ~
0:: ~ '" .... 0 III 0.., Ill,
.... .., '" (j " '1l s..
a. " .., >: u
." u III -1 ~i
0 J '1l E III - Ul_ s..
.., ~ a. III - '1l 111_ ..
>: .. s.. .., - '" s.. '1l .0
>: '" u .. u Ul 0 QI . E :: ~
0 ~ " - >: >. u r. ..,.. ..
'" U '1l '" III I1l (/) Ul >: .0 u ~u
.., s: , - '1l III ~ ~ ui '1l "-~~ a
a. " ~ III s.. Ii. s.. u U s: "
'" Ii. ll:i t- '" >: III ..- o 0
s.. .. ill s: a I1l " Ul >. c .... ~ .~ ~
U III U ] J: .., 0 a. 0 .. s.. ::s 3 ~
Ul Ii. s: Ul '1l '" ~ .. (/) 0: '1l ., J: .. ..
2l 0 .., '1l U .., 0:: i s: .., '" .Q
- '" Ul U .0 U ... - '" " . I1l ~1
.. .. 0 " ] rn '" '1l :; s..u Ill"
Ul CO s.. '" s.. " u '" '" .,CWJ:;: 0...
" "- .. .., ." " U ... ..,.., " U9
" en .., .. Ul III u " .. .. III .,
>) .... a. s: .. .. .. - 0 a. s.. >'U9 .....
u d .... '1l Q ~ '" U (/) a. s... 0 := ~~
OJ J: " fO..... "C 0
U Ul 0 U U '" >. OJ .... "... ~ s..
s: 0 j en s.. s: " .., '" C' I'd l.i-
0 ... en " 0 0 3 ." '" I1l III
'" U a. ill j a. u .... ., ,~ 1
0 0 0 .... .... "" .... ~ ~~
9 en '" en en '" i '" en
'" en '" '" en '" '"
.... .... .. .... .... ~ .... .... Ul
III ~ " N " "0 >.
.., hj .5 0 .: 0 .: ul 0 11l...
'1l h1 1 '" M 1 '" 6~
Q (Ij .... s.. "1 OJ .... s..
I1l J ..; I1l
s: OJ :> ,; ,;, .., .; :>
s: .., a. a. u
" u .. " .. ill 0 0 !
., 0 Q 0: (/) (/) Z
~ 1
I
I
1
I
!
H. ,I I 1,1, I I 1'1 i I I 'i.;I:, ,;Iil,', i I ~. ( I ,I ;1 ',1::1;;',1,:,1 ',1'1 1;1,1': 1::1'/1 JI' i:1
C ( (-, 1
1\
~~
l'Il.II,. IJ 1.1 U,~.,
I' I
i ,_: ,I
!,':I' I
I I
,I'
: I,
,_I'
,\
'-~
,," ""
\ --../
9\"".~"-'~""'"
,;,:'0\...
"" '\
,'l _~
, "
i 'I
, 1
'\, 1
'\ /
""---"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
January 21, 1992
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
"
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Corrunittee, Corrunission
Building Department ~
David Almgren ~
BY:
ITEM
NO,
6. City Hall Garage
BY:
City Hall Garage
Request
Requesting a detached garage for city vehicle parking. This parking garage
will be used for city vehicles that are presently parked outside and for
storage for city hall if necessary.
The proposed garage is as follows: Location would be at the north end of the
parking lot (by the basketball hoop) facing south; the proposed size is 26'
wide by 62' long, five 8' high x 10' wide garage doors and one 3'x6'8" service
door on the west side; proposed to wire, insulate, sheetrock with sprayed ceiling.
The cost will be approximately $22,000 ($13.65/square foot). The purpose for the
garage is: I} we require all homes built in the city to have a double garage
for vehicle parking and storage, 2} security (so far the vehicles have not been
damaged, 3) the vehicles now stay out in all kinds of weather (it has been
difficult at times to get them started), 4) last year there was approximately
$15,000 saved on building repair of the public works building when Fabcon did
not charge for the repairs.
COUNCIL ACTION
,. ,
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--
::)
(J
" '1
\. ~
-
"
~
:
-
.
I
-
I
., -
I r' )
,
I ., J
1 .
I
I 1
I ,
I i 1
, ,
J
: I
-, 1
I i 1
l- I
/ I
I
, 3
, vJ
{ I S
I~
~ ' -
II)
, ~
,
1
\ 1
I
I
\\ 1
J
~ 1
,
. ,
,
~ . .
1
I I L I
)
\, .1
\
- "
f )
,
"
f 1 I
1
1
lc 1
0 I
I
f '" '. -I ,
, .
/ I
I
I I
, -.
I I
I I
J
- :3
1 _
I ,0>
J
I
I
.I I
~ . 1
1
I 1
" ,
1
1
\' ,
I
1
1
\ I
- I
I
I ~ r-
I I
"
oJ
-.I
'5
V)
oJ
Cl
Vi
I-
~
,
\
,
.-'
I
I
I
I
1
! ,
I
:;_11
1'3
oJ
1 -
""
~
'~
'u::
I
I
I
1
\
'.
I
J
\ '
,
I,'
.' ~,
___...l..
------...--..----
-----. .-
, .
\
'J'
'~J
;~
I
1
I
\
,
II
"
.~
1
/ '1
\. ----/
~----
~ .-.- ..
11'
,
-'e,
1
r
I,
-. ~
/',
-,I~
,..
/
,
J.
,>-
1 '
db
22:0"
2~:D"
(}'
,
r
,
,
, If)
,~' h
,.....,.(,.......... .\.
I ~.)
. (.)
rJ:-
~R
,\ () _C
q. ld_-:'
,', ,'.
, uJ:? V]
,~ -L.
:1 ,? '"
, ,I
I '1'1)
. F'"
1 ,t::.
Z
),~
/'
~
0:
,
,
,
,
"
-.-]
'",
r--
'0
'...
"
'1
. 1
~~ ~
~. '0
~
~ <::
~
~ ~'~ Q
.,
?
0:- '1
0 '"
u
Q '"
\(
<'>",,-
\
\
~
1
1
\
\
o
,I
, \
. ,I
,
\ I .:0
\\ "r!-
-- ~~~~~J{:;~ -JJ -
- .'!~I'l. + Y'O'. ~
(, .
j' .
k. (...,......->1
.()
~
1.(.---
" "-
'- )
'J,
U
~
/'
~'
~)
rOC"
'" ~
-=J <:('
'"
:I:.
J--;f.-
, ~~~O'
-1
'0
',z,
'"
__pz,Cn'
,.J
v
oJ::
d~
~"
\. fi
0': 0
oce
~
<:
'IJ a::.
\-- -I
_ 0_
<J)
l- vI
'J:.I
""
-"-
..1
~,
o
I
I
"
I~
I'
.<
I
~
'.
I~,
l
~:
~ vJ
,>-
w ..
'" '" ~
2i=0
so
V)
- ....;.-.....---.1--
'''f
i
I
I
\.9 I-
'<'"
x'"
Q:
"'-
Q
'0
.'
IS)
'"
~5
~ ..J
.,c
""
kg:
;0
--L=
-"'---'--
Cf' J~
uJ <.
~ ?.~O
8 t 'X. =
~ cJ ;1)
'"
1
.' ~
<:
.
"
-J
." 0
\.J ~
b
(l
.;
ci \,
~ ~
~ ..I
'3 ~
fl ~ :;
tI) ~ ~ ~
::. tQ vJ
~ X ~ ~
.X ~O" ~
C".J ~ 'Q ~
IIJJ]lIUJJil J Jr\JrrnmmrrrrIOIIl
1
Q
.J<<
...'"
",~
~
D
o
~'S
~:>!
Ki'"
.." '+ ~
\~l ~
-~rl- ~,
- "
t ~ 5
o .
N ~ ~
Q
'"
oJ
:_)
'"
"'
...
~
" '"
7. <f)
~ '" I-;
:5"'-
'" 0. '"
"' g: ~
lit 0 \- <
"' ~ ... t
~ ,.., :t lr)
~ ~ t ~
:e ~ -
I:;
:~
-J \9\-. ~
~ 3~uJ
Q3<l3,
\_ <l:~
--.! u~
-l uJ '....
'3 If)
-
"
,
~
f')
~-)
\JJ
-l
a::
U
V)
3
vJ 0
S -1:;;
a::~
~ 8~
- LJQ
U)vJ
~.t- <J)
Q(::l
a:: a::
u.1~
0:::
\
",.j
~
'"
it
"'''
t~
",..
,,'"
::2
.:3
E ~ J
~ ~ ~
~ cO ~ -N
Q ~fl
~ ~al
:5 ~...
~ c3 ~
"'" '''''~
~ C~
~
...
'"
~
'"
OJ
"
<>
u
C<'
..,
!!!
u..
:r
.....
"
"
.'
-'
-,
,<
,
~
\-"
"I..,
v
r- Cj ~ ~2
~~ ~:i \01
~ 6 ~~ ~}
,_.~ ><.1 II
3'....J <1~-~
r.1 \ (I
1~' '(~I :t'
,"
, .
,,'
:x.:!'
'"
~
~
o
dl
....: u:
00
I.
v",
."
'"
/"~",e""""~~'~"'",,,<\
f,l ~
~J \~ )'
"""'~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
ITEM
NO'1.
Accept Park Dedication,
Indian Meadows
BY: James E. Schrantz
APPR~~FOR
~~
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Staff, Committee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
()
The City Council is requested to accept the park dedication for
Indian Meadows.
Wayne Bachman has given us a warranty Deed for park dedication
that will satisfy the park dedication for the entire remaining
plat. See the attached drawing.
Parcell, the parcel for the parking lot and a temporary easement
for street access to the parking lot until the plat is recorded.
Parcel 2, the remaining park dedication needed for the remainder
of the plat.
/
The dedication was requested as part of the agreement on the
final plat for Kelsey Estates.
'-
Attached: Letter from Wayne Bachman
Map
warranty Deed
MOTION BY
'- ) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Mr. Todd Hass
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
January 8, 1992
REISlIN6 PARK
NORTH
Re: Park Dedication and Access Easement
Dear Mr. Hass:
Enclosed are the Deed for Park Purposes and Temporary Easement as you
requested. I would ask that the City acknowledge our agreement that the
dedication of the approximately 10.2 acres of park land will be credited
toward the required future park land dedication requirements of New
Generation properties, Inc. or any successor or assign, upon platting of
any of the remaining unplatted areas within the original Andover West
preliminary plat. By the temporary nature of the easement agreement,
the City is also agreeing that the access to be provided between County
20 and the park area can be shifted to accoIT~odate changes in the
location of future road right of ways from that shown on the preliminary
plat. AS we have discussed, the City also agrees that we may choose to
,__\ redesign the grading plan for Xenia street and 155th Avenue and lower
~ this intersection by up to 3 feet, so long as other street construction
criteria are met.
Please have the copy of this letter executed and returned to me as
acknowledgement of our understanding.
Sincerely,
NEW GENERATION PROPERTIES, INC.
~Bqld~
Vice President
Accepted and Agreed to:
City of Andover
By:
Date
CJ
WAB/js
Ene.
~
\:JJ
/ '\
o
(~
CJ
FROM C~REW PROPERTIES
~lnn(l.ol. Un!~?~~ty~;~!_~.~...~~'!.!~__..__n.. ...--.. ~-----~~:~.~~"-=~~!!-
p, 3
Form No. 9.M_WAn"ANTY DECO
CQrporJ\lon ori:;;,;;;;i,ipt;-'''-
Corportltion 0' Pill t~~rsh\p
---
Nn delin'l\lnnt t.a~n. and t,ran.[er entered: Certificate
('f Rcal F"f;Rto VatUf! ( ) WAd ( ) not rcqlllrBd
CertlflcaLe of Real Est.aLe Value Nn..._--
.,19___
CounLy AudiLor
by
Deputt.
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ .-None---
D.te:
....--Janu2lj' 8
_..._' ; 19 -9-2-
(reserved [or recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSlDEltATlON. ~~X:lltion PrQD.erti"~r In"
. _._ , a _ "orporll.tioi1 under tho law. of
State of Minnesota "Grant.or, hereby convey. .nd wort.nt.to Cl1-y of Anno""r
lnunicipa1 corl)Qkatlon
Anoka
__..~__'-'-- ,Grantee, a
under the lnw!; or ~h'\l-I~ of. Minr'tHI.t)ta..__ ,real property In
_County, Minne.ot,n, described.. follow",
See Addendun A
(if IT'O" U'lI'Ir.t1 I~ M(lded, cOI\!in\.t nil lucid
together with nil hercdilanicnt., And nppurlcll!l.nr.:es b(l:l(Jnging thereto, suhJt'd to the following exceptions:
itffilS of record.
hrflx l)(~(~(l 'fAX Ht.nmp lI(~I'(~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AmKA
} ,So
COUNTY OF
The foregoing w.. acknowledged before me this
by _Wa.)Tr.-'l A R;:Irhmml
the --Yic.e-E1"'P.t:d ll~t'I""
of New: r.l.:rnp1'":lt.UJo.J'.IOrlr..rt-i ~l;! I Tl'....
undeor the laws of ----5t9.te~.o! M.it~I1"C!,.,h:J
'N QT A ItIA Lsfn!POaBiALTOi\OTiiii-T iT j,E' On-RAN K)
e BETH A. NOREEN
I<<7tNfl~A
HEN. NEptN COUNTY
IIV~-'~
'1'HIS"WSTiluMEHT WA8DRAP'Tioi"Y (i~^M E ANO-:\ObRisi);
New Gener.ation Properties, Inc.
9100 West Bloomington Freeway
Bloomington. l1N 55/,31
IW
-~
B7~~~~:~:yr~
~
II{l
Xk
At-h
'AAJl.
~dr
dal' of
,19-92- ,
l~l"11Hlrt.y
. . COq'or~t1 nn
_._, on beh.lf of t.he rorporRH 011
~~ !, J-t? (!ff~
flIOl'l^1"UU: OF PERSON TAKINO ACKNOwL.tDOMJt~r
~:~.~t.lt:(J~~l~J:~~:l't~ ~'n'! ~~~~:::~tAI,~~~:~)~n thl, Irwhumllnt .hould
GI'antee:
City of Andover
FROM C~REW PROPERTIES
(J
~-)
o
---t"'-;--"t
ADDENDUM A
PARCEL (1)
That portion of the East 328.52 feet of the Northwest Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24
lying South of a line 1,034.03 feet South of the North line of
said Section 20, Township 32, Range 24.
PARCEL (2)
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 20, Township 32, Range 24 lying Easterly of the
following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner
of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
North 89 de9rees, 49 minutes, 24 seconds East, along the South
line of sa~d Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a
distance of 310.00 feet to the point of beginning, thence
North 0 degrees, 07 minutes, 28 seconds East a distance of
875.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees, 51 minutes, 50 seconde
East a distance of 395.00 feet; then North 0 degrees, 07
minutes, 28 seconds East a distance of 447.02 feet, more or
leS6 to said North line of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter and there terminating; and excepting
therefrom the following described parcels A & B:
PARCEL (A)
The 'South 322 feet
Southwest Quarter of
24 lying East of the
of the Northwest Quarter of the
said Section 20, Township 32, Range
above described line and,
PARCEL (B)
The East 441.07 feet of the Northwest Quarter of said
Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24.
FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES
h).
~
o
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 8th day of January,
1992 by and between NEW GENERATION PROPERTIES, INC. ("Grantor"), and
THE CITY OF ANDOVER, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State
of Minnesota ("Grantee");
WITNESSETH, That whereas said Grantor is the owner of the
tract of land in the county of Anoka, State of Minnesota, viz:
The West 66 feet of the East 366 feet of
the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 20 Township 32, Range 24
Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of a
line 1034.03 feet South of the North line
of said Section 20 Township 32, Range 24,
together with the South 66 feet of the
North 1034.03 feet of the East 300 feet of
the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 20 Township 32,
Range 24.
and said Grantee is the owner of a tract of land in the County of Anoka,
State of Minnesota which adjoins said land of Said Grantor, viz:
o
That portion of the East 328.52 feet of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township
32, Range 24 lying South of a line 1,034.03
feet South of the North line of said
Section 20, Township 32, Range 24.
and whereas, said Grantor and Grantee have agreed upon the temporary
easement hereinafter described;
NOW THEREFORE, The said Grantor, in consideration of One and
nol100 Dollar ($1.00) to it in hand paid by said Grantee, receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration,
hereby grants to said Grantee, its successors and assigns, the easement
of:
A temporary easement for automobile parking
and public access over and across the above
described parcel owned by Grantor, subject
to easements of record.
C)
I\),
x.y
Page 2
"
V
This easement shall remain in effect until
such time as a permanent easement for
access to Grantee's land from County State
Aid Highway 20 across the Northwest Quarter
of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24 is
. provided to Grantee by Grantor, its heirs,
successors or assigns. At the time a
permanent easement for access is provided,
this temporary easement shall terminate and
be of no further force or effect.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD SAID TEMPORARY EASEMENT unto said Grantee,
its successors and assigns as appurtenant to said land.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Said Grantor has hereunto set its hand the
day and year first above-written.
() STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 8th day of
January, 1992 by Wayne A. Bachman, Vice President of New Generation
Properties, Inc. a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
on behalf of the corporation.
e
BeTH A. NOReiN
NOTAA'( ~Illllt' lIlI.&OTA
HEHNEPlH COUNTY
It( OOl~IIB1IOH EllI'lRGI1MM1
~ tl, 'YI4ltlL~----
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
New Generation Properties, Inc.
9100 West Bloomington Freeway
Bloomington, MN 55431
n
\.J'
~
x.y
***END>tp+<>tc
o
,""
'.
!0
. . ~:.J;:,~'~, ~;~.':~'" ':
" , .'f! ;;'.> :-:: ; I
'I" "'~..... ," .'....~ .~ ,:.",1 I I
--\tol1.>,"'I ' :til.,.I~I..lllr"1\."""'; I,
..W~. ,~__. ' . ,I'..,'""W
.," e . t-",,\#o'4-
...:. ~; : "",..... _r,":" ":!... -:.t~i:~ .
Location M ..... :-::", ,.." .j....'
._" ap " ,,', ~ .('.,' :'Xj'
o
\.
'\,
"
"
"
Q
-.
~
l?~'~"'""-~"''''\\
~r "
hl ~
0\ I
~,_""l'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
Januarv 21, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
staff, Committee, Comm
Admin.
APPR01E FOR
AG\D1~
Bvi bLJ
/
ITEM
NO.
g.
Coon Creek Maintenance
Project Proposal
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the proposal by the
Coon Creek Watershed for a cooperative effort to clean Coon Creek
from 133rd Avenue to South Coon Creek Drive.
The Watershed is proposing to clean this area as we did the area
along the WDE Site.
Frank estimates that project will take 8 weeks and we will have
to provide 3 people.
Frank is doing a further breakdown of estimated time, material
and other costs.
'-) Attached: CCWD/Kelly letter
r- MOTION BY
,
'-- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
JAN-16-1992 16: 16 FROr1 COON CREEf( WATERSHED DIST TO ANDOlJER
P.01
o 0 N
CREEK
WATERSHEO
DISTRICT
C)
12JOI .n"", AV."v* No,tll.a.t . Suit. roo. Blo/". . Mln"..o'" 1S1S4J4
January 16, 1992
Mayor and ity Council
city of An~over
1695 NW Cr sstown S1d.
Andover, M55304
RE: Ditch d,eaning - 133rd to South Coon Creek Drive
In NovembeJ1, 1991 the Board of Managers approved a project to
remove all trees and debris from the main channel of Coon Creek,
and its ba. ks, that are preventing, or impeding flow in the
creek. 'r '
The Distridt is requesting that the City of Andover assist the
Watershed ~istrict in this project through its Public Works
DepartmentJ The Watershed District would reimburse the city for
the cost at labor an~ materials.
Frank stan
is to repe
project in
and Jim Schrantz have reviewed the project. Our hope
t the success, and cooperative spirit of our joint
1991 to clean the creek adjacent to the WOE site.
~-)
We look fo ward to your response. If you have any questions or
concerns p ease call.
yours,
Tim Kelly
District. dministrator
cc: B. 80 urn
File -2-92-2
o
,rln..d _n t.oyOI.d pao_,
TnTt'"'l1 D 1A1
,- '\
'- ./
y~.,.",...."""~'~"'''''''~
,iP ~~\
A' \
~.:..j'..,.. .,';'i
1 9
'i~ I
'\ r
""'_/'.1
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
APP'~eOVE,d ItOR
AGE"
~
B-/
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Cf.
Release Escrows/
Kensington Est. 1st-6th
Howard D. KoolickHX:.....
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to release to Jerry
Windschitl the plat escrows for Kensington Estates 1st thru 6th
totaling $4,572.85.
BACKGROUND
The City currently holds the following plat escrows (including
interest earnings) for the Kensington developments:
'.
Kensington Estates
Kensington Estates Third Addition
Kensington Estates Fifth Addition
Kensington Estates Sixth Addition
Total
$957.88
$487.28
$3,160.96
$376.85
$4,982.97
In addition, the plat escrows for Kensington Estates Second and
Fourth Additions have deficit balances of $35.95 and $374.17
including interest charges. These amounts should be subtracted
from the above total leaving a total refund of $4,572.85.
Plat escrows are used by the City to pay for attorney, engineering
and sign costs during the preliminary plat stages. The City will
continue to hold the escrow securing the special assessments as
required in the development contract.
r
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\..~
_?~~~'.,.'"
l,')~"<;""'\,\
\' '\
C)\J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Non-Discussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
January 21, 1!W2
~JM Approve plans/Water
. 10. Trunk/Crosstown Blvd.
BY: James E. Schrantz
~~{~ ED FOR
\: PI~
....
BY: V
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
/
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for
bids for Project 91-19, Crosstown Boulevard Water Trunk.
John Davidson will be at the meeting to cover the plan with the
Council.
The plans have the trunk going north on Crosstown Boulevard to
148th Avenue then east to the tree farm then north, west of the
school to Tower #2.
'-
The location of the trunk near the tree farm will allow the City
to serve the proposed plat on the Santa Tree Farm property. This
location also avoids the right-of-way concerns on Crosstown
Boulevard north of 148th Avenue with the 2 small houses and the
curve. We can avoid getting involved in the right-of-way
aquisition.
Attached: Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
,--..,
'--./
MOTION BY
ITO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 91-19, CROSSTOWN TRUNK
WATERMAIN
FOR TRUNK WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 078-91, adopted by the City
Council on the 4th day of June ~9191, TKDA
has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 91-19
for Trunk Watermain construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications
the City Council for their review on the 21st
January , 19 92
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications .
were presented to
day of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 A.M.
Tuesday, February 18 , 19~ at the Andover City Hall.
o
MOTION seconded by Councilman
meeting this
and adopted
day of
by the City Council at a
, 19 , wi th Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
()
1-21RF:.c::'T'lHlNl<
C)
,-~,'i"'9,~'~"""~
i~"~'" "''','''
ii" ',",
. \
~
I
"
I'
"'_/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO.
I/.
Accept Deed/Fire
Station B
BY:
James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the Warranty Deed for
the 2 1/2 acre lot for Fire Station #3 located on Crosstown
Boulevard between 157th Avenue and 161st Avenue on the east side
of Crosstown Boulevard.
A copy of the Deed is attached.
'-
r MOTION BY
'---- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'0
I
()
o
Form No. 3.M-WAnRANTY DEED
Individual (5' to Corporation
or Partnership
Mlnnl',ot. Uniform ConvfOYRII('lnl n1llnk.. (197fl)
Millf'I-OAvl!l Co.. MltlnOllrnll~
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,l!l__
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
66.00
Date:
November 18
,l!l-.2l
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, William-E. Norlund and Phyllis Norlllnd.
husband and wife! ,Grantor(s),
Imaritalsll!ltusJ
hereby convey (5) and warrant (5) to _the City of Andover
a mllniripnl
real property in
t Grantee,
Mi nnp:~ntn ,
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
~()rporn:tinn
T\noka
under the laws of
The North 330 feet of the West 330 feet of the South Ilalf of the
Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township
32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the
described real property.
(if more spece is needed, continue on beck'
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. subject to the following exceptions:
~,;'~1- J:'l,-_:-c;,~;~--;f4&:rb-=1
Or.',' 'r. "',re.. ,,- ": (,0,00 ",,"
t~ ,:~....~ ~,..,- :' -t~'r~: ~_=_~__.-~:~P ~~:l'l:':: !
7du/TJ. 'lei lllJzr.J1-v j
--f' AftlX ill."a Tax s~#- hfl'tii;~ir:,i;;'
t',. _ _ Y~_C:..~ nP? O.p..ly
~ -- - - - -.--
CALIFORNIA
STATE OF NnN~S0'I:~ /1 } ss.
COUNTY OF~ /(t.-'Pr1..L~~
( r.-."U..
The foregoing instrument was acknowledlled before me this /,1' day of
by William E. Norlund and Phyllis Nurlund, husband
wJ c;!ll?:;; E~ Nrl~n~
\~jJ1Z; t?~~
Ph lis Norlun
'71 ~~ ,19..2..L,
and wife
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTIIER TITLE OR RANK)
- ,Grahtor (s).
,-.,~/'-.-t~",.....f'''''''''''~
f ~ -::.';E:....~ "I"n::IAL NOTARY SEAL I
1-/.;..,' t;.. SHIRLEY SHEMAN
, ~.:, -~':~t b-~,'~'~ NO, t;Jry PIJbliC. .- C~lifornia
, -. ,J!- ~r" LCl5 ^~IGELES COI,'NTY
:j ,,!;~ntG:./ ~Jly (;orn'-Il ExpIre:; JUN 24.1!n-.l:
___...._n___....__.__ _,.. __._ _ ..:....',~~..... !\',';,.'';>''!" ',,: .~..L!'.t;~_-:"I7'. 'C:'..:,r:~.'~,,:'-';,"'"':OT ~.J'~,.'~ ',_: _. __.,
Tu Shtement. tor th rut property ch.crlbed In tbl. Inatrument .bauJd
be .ent to (Include name .nd .ddre.. ot Guntee):
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
------------.---------------.-------
TillS IHSTRUMENTWAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS):
Burke and llawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., 1101
Coon Rapids. MN 55433
~{
~'O N (/))>l~
l..O C rt 1-'"
\ 1.0"'-" rt ......
" rt 0 ......
n CO r; 1-'"
:0 0 I " III
PI 0 ...... CD S
-0 :;:J 0'<
1-'" ..... G1
Po:O Ill'
III III "
. '0 :I:
-..... r' PI
1 2f,;' ~~
,."
"
III
tIl
i) ~ ~
() e ~
w
t
'\
\Q~
l
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City
State of Minnesota, has accepted on
described property in this document.
Dated:
,19_
(SEAL)
of Andover, County of Anoka,
, 19____, the above
CITY OF ANDOVER
By
Clerk
r "
v
,.,,"~_~"F""~~"""''''',C,,'
"', -~
"",' '''l"
".1It,
Y .~
fJ ti
!;, ."
" L J'
"~'. /"
~~,~.,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Item
Admin.
APPROVED ~FI R
AGE~"A
(i<!
BY:!V
/
ITEM
NO.
/;l.
Approve Pay Equity
Implementation Report
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the Pay Equity
Implementation Report that is due at the Department of Employee
Relations by the 31st of January.
The Council has approved the wages that are part of the report.
I am going over the final report with Cy Smythe on Friday and
will hand out the report at the meeting.
,
~
" \
J
".-' MOTION BY
\ - TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
~
~~
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
SPRINGSTED
Home Office
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143
(612) 223-3000
Fax: (612) 223-3002
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2825
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3368
(612) 333-9177
Fax: (612) 333-2363
16655 West Bluemound Road
Suite 290
Brookfield, WI 53005-5935
(414) 782-8222
Fax: (414) 782-2904
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
Overland Park, KS 66211-1533
(913) 345-8062
Fax: (913) 345-1770
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Andover
Mayor Ken Orttel
City Council Members
Mr. James E. Schrantz, City Administrator
Mr. Howard Koolick, Finance Director
FROM: Bob Thistle ~f<u\
DATE: January 21, 1992
SUBJECT: Andover Refundings
Background
At the City Council meeting of January 7, 1992, I presented Springsted Incorporated's
recommendation to the Council for the defeasance and refunding of the City's $2,350,000
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1985A, and the City's $1,795,000 General Obligation Bonds,
Series 1986A. At that meeting the City Council decided to delay making a final decision
pending:
1. Comments from Mr. Jim Casserly regarding his recommendation and approach to this
proposal,
2. Interest in whether any other Andover debt should be considered for refunding at this
time, and
3. What the potential additional savings would be, given the further drop in rates right after
the first of the year, on the proposed refundings for the City of Andover.
Springsted Incorporated
First, a brief background for those Council members who may not be familiar with our firm.
Springsted has been an independent financial advisor to cities, counties and school districts in
the State of Minnesota for close to 50 years. As an independent advisor, we have no financial
or legal relationships with any underwriters or banks - we do not purchase and sell municipal
debt. We believe strongly in the competitive bidding process, and wherever possible,
encourage communities to take that approach, thereby placing the financial community in
competition for the debt that you are issuing. By a wide margin, Springsted serves as financial
\
City of Andover, Minnesota
January 21, 1992
Page 2
advisor to more Minnesota municipalities than any other firm. Therefore, on a daily basis, we
deal with the financial issues confronting cities like Andover. As an example, in 1991 alone,
Springsted, on behalf of our clients, managed the issuance of 63 refunding bond issues having
a total issue value of $192,335,000. A listing of those clients and issue sizes is available for
Council review. The point being: Springsted can evaluate all the refunding options to select
that one approach which best fits Andover's long-term best interests.
Other Andover Debt Refinancing
Based on the conversation at the last City Council meeting, one question was whether there
would be any additional existing Andover debt that should be considered for refunding. We at
Springsted reviewed that existing debt and found the following:
There are only two issues that have a reasonable potential for refunding in the near
future. They are:
General Obliaation Refundina Improvement Bonds. Series 1986C
We do not believe that this is the proper time for considering a refunding on this issue.
The call date on this issue is still a little longer than we like to utilize in refunding, and
the savings at this time are marginal. Also, since the number of bonds that would be
refunded after the call date are relatively low, this is an issue that will more effectively be
refunded closer to the call date. '
1987 $1.065.000 Tax Increment Financina Issue
This issue is not feasible at this time, due to the premium cost required to invest in
Federal Treasury notes in order to get sufficient yield to cover the taxable notes that will
have to be escrowed at this time. Again, this issue should be monitored, and as it
approaches its call date of January 1995, a successful and cost-effective refunding
should be possible. Finally, the City should contact its bond counsel on this issue to
see if it is feasible to set up a tax increment project fund and to transfer all excess tax
increment funds from your current debt service fund to the project fund. Under current
law, all funds that are in a debt service fund must be used to buy down or to payoff
existing debt. Therefore, if the City has other uses for such excess funds, it currently
would not be in a position to utilize them.
Refunding of 1985 and 1986 General Obligation Bonds
We undertook a re-analysis of the potential savings the City of Andover would achieve on the
1985A and 19a6A general improvement bond issues, and based upon the most recent bond
market rates, we determined that the savings that the City of Andover would achieve by these
recommended refundings would increase from $112,000 to $126,764. The savings are based
on current market rates and will vary in relation to the actual market rate at the time that the
issue is sold.
Recommendation
It would be Springsted's recommendation that the City of Andover proceed with the proposed
refunding and defeasance of the 1985A and 1986A issues. This recommendation is based on
the following factors:
City of Andover, Minnesota
January 21, 1992
Page 3
1. The City is currently losing money on the reinvestment of debt service cash-on-hand.
Borrowing Rate:
1985A
1986A
8.77%
7.72%
Reinvestment Rate:
1-year U.S. Treasury
4.12%
This represents, in 1992 alone, a net loss of approximately $74,000 in interest proceeds.
2. Partial defeasance presents the opportunity to reduce the negative impacts of an
adverse investment condition by defeasing the lower interest rate in early maturities of
the outstanding debt.
3. The municipal tax-exempt interest rate market is at a 20-year low. Please see BBI chart
attached.
4. Refinancing presents the opportunity to reduce overall future debt service obligations
and increases the potential for future positive reinvestment of cash balances.
5. Both defeasance and refunding are viewed positively by Moody's Investors Service from
a credit rating perspective because it demonstrates the City's proactive approach to
debt management.
As was indicated at the prior meeting, should the Council, due to an adverse change in the
municipal bond market on the date of sale, decide to not proceed with the refundings, the City
of Andover would have no obligation to pay Springsted's fees. There would be some incidental
out-of-pocket costs for such items as printing, bond counsel fees and rating costs.
We would be pleased to answer your questions regarding this issue.
sms
Attachments
...-
())
..........
i""-
...-
..........
N ...-
'" ..01 0
.......
..0 Lt'li
... "
--+--' .......
C ...
ill 0
(j) ())
~ ..........
CD
0.- ...-
X ..........
...-
ill 0
0
U' --+--'
C
L ~ ())
ill 0 CD
..........
~ ill ())
=:i >- ...-
..........
m ...-
0
ill
U >
.-
c LL
0 CD
m (j) CD
..........
=:i ...-
N
0 ..........
.- ...-
> 0
~
0.-
i""-
CD
..........
N
0 L() q L() 0 L() 0 L() 0 N
..........
c:i ()) ()) oj oj r' r' (() (() ...-
...- 0
N
())
..........
<..D
...-
..........
...-
o
tua~Jad
~
SPRINGSTED
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
Home Officfl
B5 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
Sain1 Paul, MN 55101.2143
(612) 223-3000
~ax: (612) 223-3002
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2825
Minneapolis. MN 55402.3368
(612) 333-9t77
Fax: (612) 333-2363
16655 West Bluemound Road
SUite 290
Brookfield. WI 53005.5935
(414) 7B2.8222
Fax: (414) 782.2904
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
$760,000 Overland Pari<, KS 66211.1533
(913) 345.8062
CITY OF ST. PETER, MINNESOTA Fax: (913) 345.1770
GENERAL OBUGATlON WATER AND SEWER UTIUTY REVENUE
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1992A
AWARD: FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
SALE: January 6, 1992 Moody's Rating: B8a1
Interest Net Interest
Bidder Rates Price Cost " Rate
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 3.40% 1993 $755,440.00 $152,078.75
3.70% 1994 (4.6745%)
4.00% 1995
4,40% 1996
4.60% 1997
4.75% 1998
4.90% 1999
PIPER, JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD 3.40% 1993 $753,920.00 $159,379.58
INCORPORATED 3.90% 1994 (4.8989%)
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, 4.10% 1995
INCORPORATED 4.40% 1996
4.70% 1997
5.00% 1998
5.20% 1999
PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION 3.75% 1993 $754,034.00 $161,472,25
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKOF 4.00% 1994 (4.963286%)
SAINT PAUL 4.25% 1995
4.50% 1996
4.75% 1997
5.00% 1998
5.25% 1999
MOORE, JURAN AND COMPANY, 3.75% 1993 $753,540.00 $162,930.62
INCORPORATED 3.90% 1994 (5.0081 %)
JURAN & MOODY, INCORPORATED 4.25% 1995
4.50% 1996
4.75% 1997
5.10% 1998
5.30% 1999
(Continued)
~'
~
SPRINGSTED
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
,Home OIfIC9
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
Saint Paul. MN 55101-2143
(612) 223-3000
F.ax: (612) 223.3002
222 South Ninth Street
Surte 2825
Minneapolis. MN 55402-3368
(612) 333.9177
Fax: (612) 333.2363
16655 West Bluemound Road
SUite 290
Brookfield. WI 53005-5935
(414) 782-8222
Fax: (414) 782-2904
$360,000
CITY OF ST. PETER, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBUGATION RECREATION FACIUTY
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 19928
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
Overland Park. KS 66211-1533
(913) 345-8062
Fax: (913) 345-1770
AWARD: FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
SALE:. January 6, 1992 Moody'. Rating: Baa1
Interest Net Interest
Bidder Rates Price Cost & Rate
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 3.40% 1993 $357,840.00 $61,847.50
3.70% 1994 (4.5643%)
4.00% 1995
4.40% 1996
4.60% 1997
4.75% 1998
PIPER, JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD 3.40% 1993 $357,120.00 $64,376.67
INCORPORATED 3.90% 1994 (4.7510%)
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, 4.10% 1995
INCORPORATED 4.40% 1996
4.70% 1997
5.00% 1998
PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION 3.75% 1993 $356,832.00 $65,656.54
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK-OF 4.00% 1994 (4.845501 %)
SAINT PAUL 4.25% 1995
4.50% 1996
4.75% 1997
5.00% 1998
JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY 3.50% 1993 $357,480.00 $65,801.88
INCORPORATED 3.75% 1994 (4.8562%)
MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC. 4.00% 1995
4.50% 1996
5.00% 1997
5.20% 1998
) (Continued)
.1
. ..
Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc.
215 South 11th Street, Suite 300 · Minneapolis · Minnesota 55403
Office (612) 342-2277 . Fax (612) 332-4765
M~MQRA~~!!M
TO: City of Andover
Attn: Howard Koolick, Finance Director
William Hawkins, City Attorney
FROM: James R. Casserly
Mary E. Molzahn
RE: Review of 1985A and 1986A Bond Issues for Refunding or
Defeasance
DATE: January 16, 1992
INTRODUCTION
During the summer and early fall of 1991 we reviewed all
outstanding debt of the City of Andover. At that time.it was
concluded that no City debt should be refunded. At the beginning
of January, 1992, Springstead suggested that two bond issues
(1985A and 1986A) be advance refunded. Because of our ongoing
relationship with the City, and at the suggestion of your City
Attorney, we again reviewed the debt service schedules and call
provisions of the original bonds, current bond rates and current
investment rates. We have concluded that there is no reason to
currently pursue an advance refunding.
We have further concluded that such a refunding may actually
cost the City money. If the City wishes to eliminate debt, it
may do a partial defeasance. (Recently we helped the City fully
defease several of its bond issues.)
..
',1
ANALYSIS
Attached are eight sched~les. Four refer to the 1985A Bonds
and four refer to 1986A Bonds. The schedules are briefly
described below:
Schedule 85-1 recreates the S~ringstead proposal except the
lower chart includes the gross savings of $15,830 (column 9) and
th~ present value of those savings $10,641 (column 10). This
schedule illustrates that the City could save $10,641 in 1992
dollars if it proceeds with the refunding. However, this savings
is based on a very important assumption: that the City can only
achieve a 4% interest rate on its funds.
Schedule 85-2 is identical to 85-1 except that the interest
'crate assur.:ption is 5% (see column 1 in upper and lower chart).
With a 5% interesL rate assumption, the refundir.g wcu~d actuully
cost the City $21,73; (column 9). Expressed in 1992 dollars the
cost ts $14,209 (column 10).
Schedule 85-3 is the same as the previous schedules except a
5.5% interest rate is used. ;:"'he c:>st to the City is,$42, 424 or
$27,668 if present valued.
Schedule 85-4 suggests the option of defeasing a substantial
portion ($1,175,000) of its 1985A Bonds. As the chart indicates,
the City can purchase government securities at a current average
yield (1/15/92) of 5.35%. ~our best option may be to do nothing
if current yields are higher or if you think interest rates will
rise again in the near future. This option requires no issuance
of bonds and substantially reduces your outstanding debt.
'. \
Schedules 86-1, 86-2, and 86-3 analyze the 1986A Bonds and
are structured the same as the 1985A Bond schedules. Schedule
86-1 shows the gross savings, assuming a 4% interest rate, of
$97,958 (a present value savings of $47,983); 86-2 uses a 5%
interest rate and shows gross savings of $23,053 (a present value
savings of $1,397); and 86-3 uses a 5.5% interest rate showing
a cost to the City of $18,166, or using the same present value
analysis, a gross cost $23,824.
Schedule 86-4 is similar to schedule 85-4. The City can
defease all but $125,000 of its 1986A Bonds. Again, no new bonds
are required and the City has the same options.
CONCLUSION
The City has no urgent need to advance refund its 1985A and
1986A bond issues. If more realistic interest rate assumptions
are used, an advance refunding could cost the City thousands of
dollars. If the City wishes to reduce its outstanding debt, it
can simply defease substantial portions of the bond issues.
Because of prior commitments, we are unable to attend your
January 21st City Council meeting; however, there certainly
appears to be no urgency. We would be happy to provide any
further information or analysis.
SCHEDULE 85-1
CIty of Andover, Mlnntlotl
C.o. IJI1:lrov~t .ondt, .erlM 10SSA
Exl.tlng Cllh 'ION Analytl.
(I) (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) (7)
4.000' ProJltCt · 105~
flo.t Specl'l Itequ I red Exl.elng a,'\tldlng AccllU"le Tax
O.te Inter.ae A...... T.xea landa .ond. I.l.nc. Levy
1992 1,104,957
1993 44,198 91,046 0 309,365 o 930,836 0
1994 37,233 91,046 0 304,790 o 754,326 0
1995 30,173 91,046 0 3111,280 o 557,265 0
1996 22,291 91,046 0 300,m o 370,306 0
'997 ",812 86,032 0 243,660 o 227,491 0
1994 9,100 86,032 0 228,360 0 94,262 0
1999 3,770 86,032 14,295 198,360 0 0 15,010
2000 0 86,032 92,86a 1l'1,900 0 0 97,'"
2001 0 86,032 49,118 135,850 0 0 52,309
......................................................................
161,578 794,344 156,981 2,217,860 0 0 164,130
..............a==2..................:==:~...................:.:zz.....
el&lI flOll After PropDlld 1l1'\tld11\8
(I) (2) (3) (4) CS) (6) (7) (8) (,) (10)
4.COax 'roJ.ce · 105" Levy !.45OX
nOlt SPlteIII Itequl rad Exlltlng Iteflrdl". AccDI.Ilt TIIlC VIO '.V.
Ou. Interelt A...... Ttlltt .ond. .Dndt IIlane. Levy Ittflrdl", Iav''''1 "vl"'l
1992 13,940
1993 551 91,046 0 0 0 105,544 0 0 0 0
1994 4,222 91,046 0 0 0 200,811 0 0 0 0
1995 8,032 91,046 0 0 0 299 ,890 0 0 0 0
1996 11,996 91,046 0 0 23,370 379,561 0 0 0 0
1997 15,112 86,032 0 0 246,61' 234,161 0 0 0 0
19911 9,366 86,032 0 0 226,371 103, 1M 0 0 0 0
1999 4,1211 86,032 3,136 0 196,484 0 3,293 15,010 11,717 8,042
2000 0 86,032 91,063 0 177,095 0 95,616 97,511 I,m 1 m
2001 0 86,032 47,706 0 133,738 0 50,091 52,309 2,Z18 1:367
.......................................................................................,............
53,484 794,344 t41,905 o 1,003,613 0 149,000 164,830 15,830 10,641
:::..................==2a................::;a..................~=:=:=......................t====&...
I
,rtpartd by C....rly Molzahn & Alloclat.l: 1S-Jln.92
...-...
SCHEDULE 85-2
CIty of Andovar, Klnne.ot.
e.o. Improvement Bonde, 'arla. 1985A
Exl.tlng Ca.h fLow Analy.l.
(I) (2) (5) (4) (5) (6) (7)
'.OOOX 'roJ~t * 10'"
FLoet 'pecl.L R~lrad blUIng RafLrdlna AccOIIlt Tax
Olta Intara.t A..... . T.... londI Bond. 'a L .nca L.vy
1992 1,104,957
1993 ",248 91.046 0 309.365 o 941,886 0
1994 47,094 91,046 0 304,790 o 175 UtI 0
199' 38, 762 91.046 0 318.280 o 586:764 0
1996 29,338 91,046 0 300,295 o 406,ln 0
1997 20,34S 86,032 0 243,660 o 269,568 0
1998 13,478 86,032 0 UI,S60 o 140,711 0
1999 7,036 86,032 0 198,360 o 35,426 0
2000 1,nl 86,032 55.671 118.900 o 0 58,454
2001 0 86,032 49,Bl' 135.850 0 0 52,509
......................................................................
213,070 794,144 105,489 2.217,160 0 0 110,763
......................................................................
e..h 'Low Aftar Propoeed RtfLrdlng
(1) (2) (]) (4) (') (6) m (II) (') (10)
5.000x ProJt;t * 1051 Levy S.4SOX
Float SpecIaL RequIred blltlna RafLrdI ng Account Ttx 'rI/O P.V.
O,u Inter..t A...... T axe. Iondt Bonda Baltnea Levy RafLrdI,. hvlllll' lavlne'
1992 13,940
1993 697 91,046 0 0 0 105,683 0 0 0 0
1994 5,284 91,046 0 0 0 202,013 0 0 0 0
1095 10,101 91.046 0 0 0 303,160 0 0 0 0
1996 ",151 ",046 0 0 25,370 U',994 0 0 0 0
1997 19,300 86.032 0 0 246,615 244,710 0 0 0 0
1991 12,236 86. on 0 0 226,371 116.607 0 0 0 0
1999 5.130 86,032 0 0 196,484 11,985 0 0 0 0
2000 S99 86,032 18,471 0 171,095 0 82.402 51,454 C23,94I) CI5.576)
2001 0 86.0n 47,706 0 1U,nl 0 50,091 52,JOt 2,211 1.361
....................................................................................................
69,205 794,344 126.184 o 1,003.613 0 132.494 110,763 (21,731) C14,209)
....................................................................................................
'rtpared by C....rly Molzahn & A..oclatt" 1S.Jan.92
SCHEDULE 85-3
CIty of AndOvtr. Mlnnelott
C.O. Improvement landl. .erl.. 19&5A
Exlltlng Ct.h Flow Anlly,'e
m (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
5,500X "roleot · 105X
Plott .peclel R~lrtd bletll'lll Reflrodll'lll AeeOl6'lt tu.
O.te I ntlrtat A..... . t.... londt londt B.lanc. Levy
1992 1,104,957
1993 6O,m 91,044 0 309 ,365 o 047,411 0
1994 U101 91,046 0 304,790 0 m,774 0
1995 43:2111 ",046 0 JIII,2llO 0 601,7SlI 0
1994 n.097 91 046 0 3oo,29S 0 425,605 0
1997 U401 116:032 0 24'.660 0 291,3lI6 0
1998 16:026 116,032 0 2211,360 0 165,0114 0
1999 9.010 16,032 0 19&,S60 0 61,1136 0
2000 3.401 116,032 27.611 178.fJOO 0 0 29,013
2001 0 116, on 49,11111 135.1150 0 0 52,309
......................................................................
241,110 194,344 71,'49 2,217,1160 0 0 81,322
.a..=:&==...................~...........2:z2a.........................
Cuh Flow After I'ropo.ed ..flrod'ng
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
5,5001 Project . 105. Levy 5.4SOlI:
Flolt lpecl.l Rtq\llred Ixletlng .tflrodl", AccCUlt Tu 1110 ...v,
o.t. Int.r.n ,uee... t.... land. Ionde I.lanet Levy ..flrodll'lll Slvl"" IlIVlng.
1992 13,940
1993 767 91,046 0 0 0 105.753 a 0 0 0
1994 5,1116 91,046 0 0 0 202,615 0 0 0 0
1995 11.144 91,046 0 0 0 304.1105 0 0 a 0
1994 16,764 91,046 0 0 Z3,370 389,245 0 0 0 0
1997 21,408 116,032 0 0 246,615 250,071 0 0 0 0
1998 13,754 86,032 0 0 226,371 123,4116 0 0 0 0
1999 6,792 116,032 0 0 196,484 19,125 0 0 0 0
2000 1,090 16,032 70,147 0 177 D95 0 73,655 29,013 (44,642) (29,035)
2001 0 116,032 47,706 0 133: 7311 0 50,091 52,309 2,2111 1,!to7
....................................................................................................
77,536 794,144 117,853 o 1,003,673 0 123,746 111,322 (42,424) (27,668)
.........~....................................M.....................................................
Prepared by C....rly Molzahn & A..eel.tetl 15.Jan.92
SCHEDULE 85-4
. '~'ty of AndOvt~, Mlnnelat.
0.0. Iqlr_t Ionr*, "~I.. 1985A
IX'lt'~ C..h Flow Anllyel.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (I)
5.0001 Project ·
Elcrow Flolt Specl.l .~, recl lxl.tlnt Elll.tlng .oneII ACCOIa'It
Due Rac.lpt. Int.r..t A....I. TIlllI Principal 'nt.r..t ~.llecl .al.x:.
03/01192 0
08101192 241,000 45,523 0 1110,000 61,170 ",355
02/01193 ",000 1,1M 45,523 0 0 ",195 91,815
08/01193 252,000 2295 '5,523 0 190,000 61,195 140,431
021011" n,ooo 3:511 45,523 0 0 53,595 118,817
08/01194 27',000 4,722 45,523 0 220,000 n,595 239,527
02/01195 44,000 5,98lI 45,523 0 0 44,685 290,353
08/01195 289,000 7,259 45,523 0 220,000 44,68' 365,000 2,450
02/01196 '1 45,523 0 0 ZO.09O 27,944
08/01/96 699 43,016 0 0 ZO,09O 51,'69
02101197 1,289 43,01' 0 0 ZO,09O 75,784
01101197 1,195 43,016 0 0 ZO,09O 100,605
02/01/98 a,515 43,016 0 0 aO,09O 126,046
01/01198 3,151 43,016 7,877 160,000 20,090 0
02/01199 0 43,016 0 0 13,050 29,966
01/01199 749 43,016 99,319 160,000 13,050 0
02/0112000 0 43,016 0 0 5,850 37,166
01/0112000 929 43,016 54,739 130,000 5,150 0
...............................................................................
1,221,000 36,197 751,328 161,935 1,260,000 545.460 365.000 0
...........za.................................::2..............................
· AIIUIleI Cllh on hand .ft.~ 211192 band 'nt.re.t pa~t ,. ", 104~957
IIlcI that It 'I III \lied to rare"... 1I000N'11lent ItC\II' till. The CI
flow frotn thll' .leurl t I.. . .hOWl In calum 1. ,It. everave yl.lct
on the Inveltmontl ualng the eurr.nt VIII St~..t prle.. II 5.351
Pr.pered by C....rly Malz.hn & AIIOCI.tll: "'Jan'92
SCHEDULE 86-1
CIty of Andover, "Imesote
C.O. Improvement landi, lerle. 19I6A
f~l.tlng CI.h 'low Analy.t.
(1) CZ) (3) (4) m (6) (7)
4.000ll: PraJect * 10'"
Flalt lpeelel Requtred bl.Hng lie f l.I'd I ng A~COll'\t Tall
Oate Interut Ae..... Till" landa 10neI. 1.lenee Levy
1992 1,258,785
1993 50,351 11 103 0 218,065 01,102,874 0
1994 44,115 " : 803 0 209,690 o 949,102 0
1995 31,964 11 ,80S 0 201,065 o 797,804 0
1996 31,012 11,803 0 192,190 o 640,530 0
1997 25,073 634 0 lU,065 0 492,172 0
1998 19,715 634 0 197,115 0 315,406 0
1999 12,616 634 0 ''',490 0 142,166 0
2000 5.687 634 21,121 170,208 0 0 22,807
2001 0 634 139,116 139,750 0 0 146,072
2002 0 634 129 ,304 129,938 0 0 135,769
.....................................................................
228,334 51,016 290,141 1,&28,276 0 0 304 ,648
~e=.t.a.........................................=................~:..
CI.h Flow After Propo.ed .efundlng
(1) (2) (S) (4) (5) (6) (7) (I) (9) (10)
4.000t Project * lOSS Lwy 5.45OX
Flolt SpecIe I lequ I red bl.tl~ ..flftllng ;'CCOll'\t TIJl 1110 P.V.
Dlte Interest 18.... . Tille. londe londt 1.lenee ~'VY .efundl~ 'Ivlng. I.vl~.
1992 11,010
1993 720 11,803 0 0 0 SO,533 0 0 0 0
1994 1,221 11,103 0 0 0 41,558 0 0 0 0
1995 1,742 11,803 0 0 0 57,103 0 0 0 0
1996 2,284 11,803 0 0 0 71,190 0 0 0 0
1997 2,84& 634 0 0 6,nO 67,952 0 0 0 0
1991 2,718 634 1S,167 0 86,471 0 15,926 0 ( 15,926) (11,!S4)
1999 0 634 76,961 0 77,595 0 eo,809 0 (80,809) (55,462)
2000 0 634 sa,514 0 59,141 0 61,440 22,807 (311,632) (25,126)
2001 0 634 26,255 0 26,880 0 27,5611 146,072 118,504 73,040
2002 0 634 19,951 0 20,585 0 20,949 1S5,769 114,821 67,065
.................................................................................................
l1,S34 51,016 196,148 0 277,408 0 206,691 304,648 97,958 47,98S
~r:=a...............a............:=:...........e====~.............;::a.................:.........
repared by e...erly MOlz.hn 'A..celete.: 15.Jen.92
SCHEDULE 86-2
City of Andover, Mlnnelott
0.0. I~rov~t londa, lerl.. 1986A
f~lltln8 C.sh F(OW Ant(ytll
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
5.000" Project · 105"
HOlIt lpeel.( "qui red EditIng Refll'ldlng A~~OlI'lt Tax
Dlte InttrtU Alaeu. Taxtl londa londa I.(_t Levy
1992 1,258,~
1993 62,939 11,803 0 218,065 o 1,115,462 0
1994 sS,m 11,803 0 209,690 o 973,340 0
1995 48,667 11,803 0 201,065 0 132,754 0
1996 41,638 11,803 0 192,190 0 694,004 0
1997 J4 700 6S4 0 183,065 0 546,274 0
1991 27;314 634 0 197,1115 0 J76,406 0
1999 18,820 634 0 186,490 0 209,:171 0
2000 10,469 6:14 0 nO,2oa 0 50,265 0
2001 2,513 634 86,338 139,750 0 0 90,654
2002 0 6:s4 129,304 129,938 0 0 135,769
.....................................................................
302,133 51,016 215,642 1,1128,276 0 0 226,424
.............a:c::a..............:=:..............a::::..............
C.sh F(ow Afttr Propoled ..fundlng
(1) (Z) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (I) (9) (10)
5.000X Project · 1051 L t't'Y '.45OX
Hoat Ipt~ll( R~lred hItting ..fundln; AccOIIIt Tax WIO '.Y.
Dlt. Interlat Aa.... . "~tl londa Iondt Bal.net Levy .efundlng IIvlngt lev I,..
1992 18,010
1993 901 11,1103 0 0 0 30,714 0 0 0 0
1994 1,536 11,1103 0 0 0 44,052 0 0 0 0
,m 2,203 11,1103 0 0 0 H,058 0 0 0 0
1996 2,903 1 I ,1103 0 0 0 72,764 0 0 0 0
1997 3,638 634 0 0 6,720 7'0,516 0 0 0 0
1991 3,516 634 12,005 0 86,471 0 12,606 0 (12,606) (9,130)
1999 0 634 76,961 0 77,595 0 110 ,1109 0 (110,1109) (55,W)
2000 0 634 58,514 0 59,148 0 61,440 0 (61,440) (39,960)
2001 0 634 26,255 0 26,1189 0 27,568 90,654 63,087 31,184
2002 0 634 19,951 0 20,585 0 20,949 135,769 114,821 67,065
.................................................................................................
14,696 51,01' 193,686 0 2n,4011 0 203,371 ZZ6,424 23,053 1,'97
...........~c=...............&=*..............c=:~...............:==:..................:==.......
'repared by CIIser(y MolZlh" & A.loelltell 15'Jan-92
SCHEDULE 86-3
. .
c~ry of AndOv.r, Mlnn.lot.
a.o. Improvement land., '.rl.. 1986A
bl.tlng C'lh Plow AnaIVlI.
Dat.
(1) (2)
5.50~
Flott lpeel,'
Int.r.at A......
(S) (4)
1t.q.lIftd hlatlng
Tax.. londe
(5) C6)
Project ·
R.fundlng Account
londl ..lltlet
(7)
10"
Tax
Levy
1992 1,251, 78S
1993 69,2SS 11,803 0 218,065 0 1,121,"6 0
1994 61,697 11,803 0 209,690 0 985,566 0
1995 ~,206 11,803 0 201,065 0 850,510 0
1996 ".nl H,803 0 192,190 0 716,901 0
1997 19,430 634 0 183,065 0 573.899 0
1998 31,564 634 0 197,815 0 401.283 0
1999 22,456 634 0 186,490 0 244.883 0
2000 13.469 634 0 170,208 0 &I.m 0
2001 4,&13 634 45.456 139,750 0 0 47.729
2002 0 634 129.304 129,938 0 0 135.769
.....................................................................
343.715 51,016 17'4,760 1.828.216 0 0 183.498
-................................................................c...
c.ah '1011 Aft.r 'rClpOltd It.fundlng
Dati
(1 )
5.500"
FIOIt
Interelt
(2)
.pecl.1
All....
(3) (4)
RMl'Jlrtd ElClttlna
T axil land.
(5) C6)
ProJect ·
It.f~ln9 Account
land. lalene.
(7') (8) (9)
1051 L~
Tax W/O
L.vy Rtfll'ldlng _Ivlng.
(10)
5.4SOX
'.V.
Itvl"..
1992 18,010
1993 991 11 ,803 0 0 0 SD,ClO4 0 0 0 0
1994 1 694 11,803 0 0 0 44,301 0 0 0 0
1995 2:437 11,803 0 0 0 58,540 0 0 0 0
1996 S.220 11,8OS 0 DOn 563 0 00 0
1997 4,046 634 0 0 ',no 71:523 0 0 0 0
1m 3,934 634 10.3110 0 86,471 0 10,899 0 (10,899) (7.894)
1999 0 6S4 76,961 0 77,595 0 80.809 0 C8O.809) (55,462)
2000 0 634 51.514 0 59,148 0 ",440 0 (61,440) (39.960>
2001 0 634 26,255 0 26.889 0 27.568 47,729 ZO.161 12,426
2002 0 634 19.951 0 20,585 0 20,949 135,769 114,821 67.065
.................................................................................................
1'.:5Z1 51.016 192,061 0 2n,408 0 201.664 183,498 (18.166) (Z3,lI24)
...........===...........,::::............z::s...........c::===a.............c===................
'repered by e...trly Mollthn & A.loel.te.: IS.Jtno92
",
SCHEDULE 86-4
.. .
,.
City of Andover, Mlnneeota
C.O. lft1)rov...\t 'Ol'\da, larl" 19a6A
Ixl.tlng C..h Flow Analyal.
(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (a)
5.0001 Project .
Eacrow Float lpeelal Raqul red Elll.tlnQ E.datlna londt Accoc.nt
Data ReceIpt. Inter"t A..... . Tax" Principal Intertlt Called "llnCe
03/01/92 0
Da/O 1/92 173,000 5,902 0 125.000 48,'~ 5 307
0l/01/93 4S , 000 133 5,90:t 0 0 44,470 11:871
08/01/93 169,000 297 5,902 0 125,000 44,470 17,S99
02/01194 40,000 440 5,902 0 0 40,220 23,720
08/01/94 166,000 593 5,902 0 125,000 40,220 30,995
02/01195 55,000 rn 5,902 0 0 SS,II45 36,&26
08/01/95 161,000 921 5,902 0 125,000 35,1145 43,eo3
02/01/96 32,000 1,095 5,902 0 0 SI,S45 51,455
01/01196 679 ,000 1,2a6 317 0 125,000 SI,J45 570,000 5.713
02/01/97 143 317 0 0 4,934 1,216
Da/O 1/97 31 317 3,354 0 4.934 0
02101/98 0 S17 4,621 0 4.934 0
Da/Ol/98 0 317 4.621 0 493& 0
02/01/99 0 317 4,621 0 4'938 0
Da/Ol/99 0 317 4,621 0 4:038 0
02/01/2000 0 317 4,621 0 4,938 0
OS/01/Z000 0 317 4.621 0 4,931 0
02/01/2001 0 317 4,621 0 4,93& 0
Da/01/2001 0 317 129.621 125,000 4,938 0
...............................................................................
1,500.000 ',tl:S 50,699 165,318 no,ooo 401 , 730 570,000 0
........==a..........:...........c..........a:............:2............==.....
· A..ume. ca.h on hand after 2/1/92 ~ lntete.t pI~t I. ",;z,'~785
and thlt It I. all Uled to purch..a ,oy.rl'llllnt ._ tlee. Tha c..
flON fr~ theaa ..curltle. I. ahgwn In column I. Tha avara.. yield
on the Inv"ulInu Ullne the currant Wall Itr..t prlcea la 5.93'
'rapered by Cal.arly Molzahn & A..oclate.: IS'Jan.92
',','>~;<""'"'''"~'''''''''''"''''
,,;/ ''\
,~ '\
2f ~
~ J
" .i'
'" yo. '
''f_
.~'
'"
'~Ji'>~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Januarv
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Add-On
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
er an
Alternate Member to th
the Lower Rum River WM BY:
Admin.
James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to appoint the member and alternate
member to the Lower Rum River WMO.
James Schrantz as member and Bruce Perry as alternate member.
Bruce and I were appointed in 1985 by Council motion.
The Joint Powers Agreement requests that the member and alternate
member be appointed by resolution.
Attached: Resolution
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. -92
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBER AND ALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE LOWER
RUM RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION.
WHEREAS, James Schrantz and Bruce Perry have served as
member and alternate member since 1985; and
WHEREAS, they have both agreed to continue serving as member
and alternate; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby appoint James Schrantz as the member
to the LRRWMO and Bruce Perry as alternate member.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 21st
day of
January , 19 92 .
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
1-21RESWMO
****************************************************************
*...************************************************************~'"
:... ",'"
...... ",'"
... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
:: .~AT'S-'iAEPENI.NG?_ ::
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",.
...... ",,,,
...... ",,,,
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... January 21, 1992 ",,,,
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
..... - Communi t School Joint Power A reement ",'"
~~ At t east C t ~~
~~ ounCl mee lng t e Councll approved ~~
:: signing the agreement with the stipulation that ::
...... the program will be the same as last years. ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
..... I~ we do not sign the agreement now the program ",'"
:: wl11 stay the same. We can wait until later ::
:: this year and sign the agreement for 1993. In ::
...... 1993 the funding may change depending on what ",'"
:: the other cities in School District 11 do!! ::
...... ",'"
:: I recommend that we wait until later to sign the ::
..... agreement. ",'"
..... ",'"
...... ",'"
:: Comprehensive Plan proposed changes after we met ::
...... with the Metro Council Staff. .'"
...... :jo'"
...... ",'"
...... ",,,,
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
<<. ..
...... .'"
.... .*
...... :jo'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",,,,
...... ",,,,
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",'"
...... ",*
...... ",*
....... ",*
...... ",.
...... ",.
...... ",.
...... ",.
...... ",.
...... ..
..... ",.
...... .*
"';0 ",*
"';0 ..
"-I&- ,r ...
..... .'"
..... ",.
..... .*
..... .*
..... ",.
..... ",.
....... .'"
.... ..
.....' ..
;0...*************************************************************.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COUNTY OF ANOKA
cS-,
\ \J-\\oa-
Department of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520
January 13, 1992
Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN. 55304
Re: Sketch Plan
Pinewood Estates
Dear Todd:
I have completed a preliminary review of the sketch plan for Pinewood Estates, to
be located north of CSAH 16 (Andover Boulevard NW) and west of CSAH 78
(Hanson Boulevard) in the City of Andover, and offer the following comments:
Right-of-way along CSAH 78 is adequate as depicted on the sketch plan
(75 feet from centerline). However, an additional 10 feet (60 feet from
centerline) will be required to accommodate future reconstruction along
CSAH 16. City streets constructed along the 148th Lane NW and 147th
Avenue NW alignments would be at ideal locations for intersections with
CSAH 78. Available sight distance at both locations, as well as at the
city streetjCSAH 16 intersection appear to meet current requirements.
Access for all lots must be made from the city streets. No lot accesses
will be permitted along CSAH 78 or CSAH 16.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I am withholding a formal review of
this development plan until a preliminary plat has been prepared. Feel free to
contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~
Jane Pemble
Traffic Engineer
xc: Skip Anderson, County Surveyor
xc: Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Technician
dmh/1ANDOVER
f.;').
~
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
,,'~A"'"'"'"~<~""'~\,'
j '}
;7 j
1 ~
. 1
'-\ Ij
'.~_/)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1992
,
AGENDA SECTION
NO. f . I
In ormatlona
ITEM
NO.
Comprehensive Plan
Proposed Changes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
In early January, the City was informed by Metropolitan Council
that the overall revision of the Comprehensive Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the WOE site were incomplete for
council review. As a result, members of City Staff and
consultants met with representatives of Metropolitan Council on
January 14, 1992 to address those areas considered incomplete and
indicated on the attached cover letters from Mary E. Anderson,
Chair and the memos from Jim Larsen, Senior Planner.
The following items were discussed at the meeting on January 14,
1992.
1. MUSA population and household forecasts.
Staff has revised the appropriate tables in the Comprehensive
Plan and divided the population and household figures between
the urban service area and the rural area.
2. Clarification of how Andover intends to expand the urban
service area and the staging of the future urban service area
by 5 year periods.
TKDA has addressed the issue of the staging of growth in the
urban service area and has provided new flow projections.
Staff has also corrected the text to be consistent with the
MUSA phasing map.
3. Metropolitan Council is concerned that the amount of flow
projected for the CAB interceptor is high. The City used flow
projections from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for
the CAB service area. Staff in replying to the concern has
calculated flow projections based on the area south of Lund's
Round Lake Estates.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Page Two
Compo Plan Changes
City Council Meeting
January 21, 1992
4. The Met. Council was concerned that the City, although at this
time does not allow private or community treatment facilities,
has no provisions or conditions under which they would be
allowed. This relates especially to the WOE site and the
potential treatment facility that may be constructed.
Staff will prepare a statement to be included in the
Comprehensive plan that would allow a facility in special
situations similar to the WOE Site. The City will also
consider how such a facility shall be regulated.
5. Concern was stressed by Met Council on surface water quality
and wetland mitigation requirements.
The Comprehensive Plan states that the City will work with the
Dept. of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, the Coon
Creek Watershed District, the Lower Rum River WMO, etc. Staff
will be adding a clause stating that the City will use the
best management practices (BMP's) of the PCA,' BWSR and other
related agencies. The City will still rely on the watershed
district and the WMO's to enforce the interim wetland
legislation.
6. The Transportation Chapter was found to be inadequate by Carl
Ohrn, Principal Planner. The City used and refers frequently
to the Anoka County 2010 Plan in this chapter. Met. Council
staff was concerned with the low population figures used in
the 2010 Plan versus the City's future population
calculations. Met. Council would like the City to use the
2010 plan as a starting point and plug-in our population
figures to determine whether an adequate road system can be
provided for in the future and the impact on the principal
arterials such as Highways la, 65, and 169.
City Staff has the understanding that we do not have a lot of
control over our transportation network since the majority is
the county road system. Staff has contacted the Anoka County
Highway Department and asked for their assistance in this
matter. Jon Olson of the County received the City's
population projections and was to discuss the matter with Carl
Ohrn, Met. Council.
7. In general Metro. Council staff were concerned with the amount
of control or lack of control the City has in regard to the
WOE site. City Staff feels that the City does not have a lot
of control because of the nature of the site and the players
involved (PCA, EPA). The City will be asking the parties
involved that they receive the necessary permits, but Staff is
unsure as to what control we really have on the site.
..
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mearl!'ark Cenrre, 230 Easr Fijlh Srrw. Sr. !'aul, MN. JJJOJ 6J229J-615,
.'
.'
"
January 2, 1992
Mr. David L Carlberg
City oC Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover MN 55304
RE: City of Andover
Comprehensive Plan AmendmentuOveraIl Plan Revision
Metropolitan Council District 9
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14206-5
Dear Mr. Carlberg:
The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of Andover's comprehensive plan
amendment received by the Council on December 17, 1991. We have determined that the
proposed amendment is Incomplete for Council review.
The Council requests that the city provide additional information regardina transportation and
sewers so that the Council can determine the potential impact of this plan amendment upon the
metropolitan trsns'portation and sewer systems. With regard to transportation, the analysIs Is
based on the Anoka County Transportation Plan. Anoka County uses forecasts oC population and
households for Andover that are significantly lower than those in the Andover plan. The city's
transportation analysis needs to use higher levels of development consistent with Its proposed
population and household forecasts to determine if the city will have an adequate minor arterial
system. The cHy also must analyze transpOrlalion impacts assuming maximum buildout under
present zonIng. See attachment 1 for detailed comments regarding inadequacies in the sewer plan
and surface water management issues.
The Council cannot act on the proposed amendment until it receives the needed information. and
the review period for the plan amendment will not begin until the requested informati,on has been
supplied. If you have any questiolU about this matter, please contact Richard Thompson,
principal reviewer, at 291-64".
Sincerely,
cc: Kenneth Kunzman, Metropolitan Council District 9
Lynda VOie, Metropolitan Council Staff
Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff
Attachment 1
MErROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minn~ot3 55101
612.291.6359
\' \'
DATEI December 27, 1991
TOI Dick Thompson
FROMI Jim Lanen
SUBJECT! City of Andover
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Land Use Plan
Referral File No. 14206-5
Initial10.Day Review
.................................
COMPLETENESS FOR REVIEW
This amendment is not complete Cor review. Utilizing the "Checklist For Determining
, Completen~ of Major Comp~hl:llSiVl: Plan Amemlment.s: Sewers", the following categories of
information were deemed incomplete.
A. 1. The MUSA population and household forecasts Cor 1990 (actual), 2000, and 2010
include the entire rural service area as well. "I'1m same situation was noted In the
initial review of their July 1991 plan amendment, (Referral File No. 14206-3). and
the other December 1991 amendment. The discrepancy should be cleared up
befo~ Our review proceeds on these two :nost recent amendments.
A2. Maps indicating metropolitan sanitary sewer service and staging of future service
by S-year periods (Figures lV-E and IV.G) do not agree with text (Sections IV-D
and IV-E) and table (Tables IV.C and IV.D) information. It is unclear how the
city actually intend3 to expand its urban sexvice area. This needs to be clarified
beEorc we besin our review.
A.3. The projected sanitary ~ewer flows for the years 2000 and 2010 do not reflect the
city's expre.s:led plans for growth, 113 was noted in comment A2. above. This was
al.5o brou&ht up durini the initial review or the city's July 1991 amendment llnd
was not explained. The two amendments received in December each have
different sanitary sewer flow projections for 2000 and 2010.
A4. An Inconsistency seems to exist in the ~outhwestern area of the city, currently
slated primarily Cor rural residential land use; (2..5 acre lots), but also pLanned to
<:onsist of 1200 sewered housebolds at a dcnsity of 2.~ units per acre to be serviced
by an extension of the CAB Interceptor by 2000.
---. .-....... ,.......... I~'-'.'-'J.':" .:..:.-'~ Q...J,-'''-J
H::''"+::'-.lCJ(
"
B.3. The plan states that there are currently no private or community treatment systems
within the city, but it does not describe the conditions under which they will be
allowed in the future. They cannot declare that under no circumstances will such
systems be acceptable in the future (wording we typically request), because the
city's other amendment submitted in De~mb~r 1991 involves an addition to the
MUSA that will specifically require construction of a wastewater treatment facility
to treat contaminated gro\lnd water and acquisition of an NPDES permit to
discharge to Coon Creek. The city should more specifically address the conditions
and requiremenu they intend to put into place for that specific facility and other
pos.sible future facilities. ParceI., of land well out Into the rural service area have
been set aside for commercial and Industrial development. Since metropolitan
sanitary sewer service will not be available to these sites, the city should lndlcate In
their plan what policies and requirements relative to wastewater treatment they
intend to require for these sites.
Regarding surface water quality, the proposed plan amendment inadequately addresses the
following areas:
Included in the amendment is the statement that the city intends to work with
state and federal agencies in an effort to follow the Governor's No.Net-Loss policy
relative to wetlands within the state. The concerns and extent of protection of
many of those agencies is very limited however, so some indlcatlon needs to be
provided by the city of what city policies and best management practices are in
place or will be put in place to prevent filling or alteration of wetlands within the
city, or what type or mitigation requiremenu would be required by the city. The
city needs to take the lead in this matter. This plan should include a map of all
wctlanda'within the city. Council pollcy 3-4 of the Water Resources Management
Development Guide/Policy Plan, Part 3 calls for the preservation of natural
wetlands. The city's Comprehensive Plan Task Force identified as one of their
eight primary concerns (on page 1-3) that "The continued expansion of
development within the communIty poses a threat to environmentally sen.dtlve
areas which should be protecteO." The city neecjj to more specifically address that
concern in thi3 plan. If the plan amendment submitted in July 1991 is any
indication of the city's intent to follow the Governor's No.Net-Loss policy relative
to wetlands, their apparent interpretation of that policy is vastly different than
Council.t4fl"..
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MtaT! Farle CtIlIU. 230 EaSI Fifth Slrut, SI. Paul, MH, 55101 612 291.6JS~
December 31, 1991
"
.'
"
Mr. David L. Carlberi
City of Andover
1685 CroS&town Boulevard N.W.
Andover MN 55304
RE: City oC Andover
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Sewer Extension to Wa.!te Disposal Site & MUSA Expansion
MetropolItan Council District 9
Metropolitan Council Referra,l File No. 14206-4
Dear Mr. Carlberg:
The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of f\ndover's comprehensive plan
amendment received by the Council on December 16, 1991. We have determined that the
proposed amendment Is fneompletc: for Qluncil review.
The Council requests that the city provide additional information so that the Council can
determine the potential impact of this plan amendment upon the metropolitan sewer system.
The Councll also ,needs addltiooallnformat!on relative to population forecasts and stormwater
manaieme.nt (See attachment 1).
The Council cannot act 00 the proposed amendment until it receives the needed information, and
the review period for the plan amendment will not begin until the requested information has been
supplied. If you have any questions about this matter or would like to meet to discuss this, please
contact Richard Thompson, principal reviewer, at 291-6457.
Sincerely,
ee: Kenneth Kunzman, Metropolitan Council District 9
Lynda VOie, Metropolitan Council Staff
RIcbard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff
---"--- .-- ..----- ~~~
W,:)'-t:;> rl::.J..)
AC:achmenc 1
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Mear3 Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Micnesota 55101
612.291.6359
"
"
"
DATEI
December 26, 1991
TOt
Dick Thompson
FROMI
Jim Larsen
SUBJECT:
City of Andover
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Sewer ExtensIon to W83te DIsposal Engineering Site
Rcfcmli File No. 14206.4
mitlaI10-Day Review
.................................
COMPLEIENESS FOR REVIEW
ThIs amendment is not complete for review. Utilizing the "Checklist For Determining
Completeness of Major Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Sewers", the following categories of
information were deemed inC()mplete.
A1. The MUSA population and household forecasts for 1990, 2000, and 2010 Include
the entire rural service area as welL This same situation was noted in the initial
review of their last plan amendment, (Referral File No. 14206-3), and was never
C()rrected. This discrepancy should be cleared up before our review.
A3. The projected sanitary sewer flo~ for the years 2000 and 2010 do not in any way
reflect the city's plans for growth as indicated on Exh1'bil 'E' of Attachment 'N or
the service area maps in Attachment '0', Thi" WlI3 abo brought up during the
initial review of the city's last amendment and was not explained. Also, only
fe$idential and neither commercial nor industrial flows appear to have been
included in the evaluation of the ultimate sewer flow capacity allocated to Andover
in the Coon Rapids interceptor, discussed in the letter from the city's consulting
engineer in Attachment 'A',
B-3. The plan states that there are currently no private or community treatment systenu
within the city, but it does not de:scnoe the conditiotU UIlder which they will be
allowed. They cannot declare that under no circumstances will such systenu be
aceeptable in the future (wording we typically requc.1t), because this amendment
involves an addition to the MUSA that will specifically require corutruction or a
wutewater treatment facility to treat C()ntaminated ground water and acqlililtlon of
an NPDES permit to di.scharge to Coon Creek. The city should more specifically
address the conditions and requirements they intend to put into place Cor this and
other p033iblc future s}'Stelns. Contaminated ground water di3charges into the
1"'t...'-t-' 1>;...1-,
metropolitan disposal system are only considered temporary by the MWCC, and
subject to available capacity and compatibility of treatment. We should obtain a
formal response to the latter from the ?vrwcc noting their acceptance of flow
from this ~ito into the MDS, prior to final approval of this amendmeol
ReiardiD~ surface water quality, the proposed plan amendment Inadequately addresse$ the
followioi areas:
Wetlancb arc proposed to be filled and altered on the site, and the U.S. Corps of
EngineeI3 '404' Permit pro~s has not been started to quantify the extent of the
rot activities to be undertaken over tho entire 114-acre site. Since the Coon Creek
floodplain is being encroached upon by some of the rul activitle", wetland
mitigation sites should be located in the same sub-basin as the lost
storage/functional value of the existing wetlands. Council polley 3-4 of the Water
Resourr:es Management Development Guide/Pollcy Plan, Part j calls for the
preservation of natural wetlands. The Council recommends a 1:1 minimum
mitigation effort in the event wetlands must be .destroyed or altered. How will the
wetland& on the southwest corner of the site be preserved In their natural state if
they are to be recipients of a large percentage of the stormwater runoff from the
capped site? Stormwater runoff should be pre-settled In comtructed sedimentation
basins upstream or wetland areas.
Preliminary d~i~ information provided concerning the stormwater retentlool
sedimentation pond proposed to be comtructed at the northwest corner of the site
indicates that it is proposed to serve three dIfferent functions at the site; mitigation
ior filling of wetlands on the site, receive treated wlUtewater from a facility to be
desiiIled, and cotl.'ltructed (in tbe future) to provide treatment for extracted
groundwater, and be a stormwater drainage/retention pond to recem runof! from.
approximately 40% or the site. 1'hu Ilned, rip-rapped, fenced basin constructed
outside or the floodplain is unacceptable to replace the functional value or filled
wetlands on the site within the floodplain. Current information should be supplied
relative to the design of all planned stormwater retention facilltio for the capped
site.
.'