HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 5, 1993
-"
'~
/"(j}. ."."',.,,..
1'\.."
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting - October 5, 1993
Call to Order - 7:30 p.m.
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Amended Special Use Permit/Propane Tank/Total Mart
2. Special Use Permit/17395 Hanson Boulevard
3. Rezoning/Ashford Development/Sections 25 and 26
4. wittington Ridge preliminary Plat
5. Boulevard Encroachment Ordinance No. 95
6. Appeal to Ordinance 95/14971 Bluebird Street NW, Cant.
7. Appeal to Ordinance 95/1469 - 140th Lane NW, Cont.
Staff, Committees, Commissions
'~
-....J
8. City Hall Expansion Discussion
Non-Discussion Items
9. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/92-20/Woodland Creek 3rd
10. Adopt Assessment Roll/92-20/Woodland Creek 3rd
11. Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/92-24/Andover Boulevard
12. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/92-24/Andover Blvd.
13. Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/92-18/Jay Street
14. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/92-18/Jay street
15. Declare Cost/Order Asse~sment Roll/92-29/Echo woods
16. Declare cost/Order Assessment Rol1/89-18/Storm Sewer
17. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/89-18/Storm Sewer
18. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/92-30/1805 Andover
19. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/93-15/~atermain
20. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Hearing/93-19/Watermain
21. Accept Easement/Commercial Blvd/Kottke Bus
22. Award Bid/93-l1/Emercld Glen
23. Partial Release of woodland Pond plans & Specs Escrn.,
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
.'
"
----)
/--~
CITY OF ANDOVER
'----"
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t-O,
SECTION
Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
t-O.
Admin.
BY:
Approval of Minutes
v. Volk ~.D'
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
September 21, 1993
Regular Meeting
./- - \
'--
, MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
'--
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE october 5, 1993
Discussion Items
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City planner
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
AGENDA
toO.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
toO.
BY:
Amended Special Use Permit
Propane storage Tank
Total Mart/ Q Midwest
13725 Crosstown Drive NW
/.
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to
request of Total Mart dba Q
1,000 gallon propane tank.
13725 Crosstown Drive NW.
review the Amended Special
Midwest to install an above
The property is located at
Use Permit
ground
\
'- )
Planning & zoning Review
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their August 24, 1993
meeting, tabled the item pending further review by Staff and
because the applicant was not present to address questions of the
Commission.
The planning and zoning Commission, at their September 14, 1993
meeting, made the motion to recommend approval of the Amended
Special Use Permit with conditions. The Commission was very
concerned with the proposed location of the propane tank as
reflected in the minutes from the September 14, 1993 meeting. The
Commission recommended the location of the tank be moved south
closer to Bunker Lake Boulevard to resolve traffic circulation and
safety problems in the parking lot. The Commission directed the
Planning Department and the Fire Marshal to review the new
location for code compliance. The Commission also directed the
applicant to contact the Anoka County Highway Department for their
comments on the placement of the tank. Staff will make these
comments available at the meeting.
The Council should still consider and examine the safety of the
tank located in close proximity to the intersection and may wish
to reduce the size of the tank to 500 gallons.
Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption
based on the recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission.
\_) MOTION BY:
TO:
SECOND BY:
"
,___J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF Q
MIDWEST, INC. D.B.A. TOTAL MART TO INSTALL A 1,000 GALLON ABOVE
GROUND STORAGE TANK FOR THE BULK STORAGE OF PROPANE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13725 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Q Midwest, Inc. d.b.a. Total Mart, has requested
an Amended Special Use Permit to install a 1,000 gallon above
ground storage tank for the bulk storage of propane on the
property located at 13725 Crosstown Drive NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), legally described on Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 4.26; and
"
\
,-)
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
public opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & zoning Commission and approves the request of Q Midwest
d.b.a. Total Mart to install a 1,000 gallon above ground storage
tank for the bulk storage of propane on the property located at
13725 Crosstown Drive NW, legally described on Exhibit A with the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide to the City, in writing, proof
that the tank meets all State requirements and installation
requirements.
2. The Amended Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
3. The Andover Fire Marshal inspect the tanks and their
installation.
4. The Amended Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
5th day of October, 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
\,
'---.)
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
\
(~_/
,.
, ,
, .
(~)
~)
~
EXHIBIT A
That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section
33, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as
follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said South
Half 1536 feet West of the Southeast Corner thereof, thence North
at right angles to said South line 227.84 feet (said South line
having an assumed bearing West), thence North 30 degrees 09
minutes East 109.99 feet to intersect with a line drawn North 59
degrees 51 minutes West from point "A" said point "a" being on a
line drawn perpendicular to said South line from a point 1426 feet
West of the Southeast Corner of said South Half (as measured along
said South line) and 291.15 feet North of said South line (as
measured along said perpendicular line), thence North 59 degrees
51 minutes West to a point on the center line of CSAH No. 18
(Crosstown Drive NW) said point being 302.97 feet from said point
"A", thence South 30 degrees 37 minutes, 55 seconds West 515.22
feet to said line, thence East along said line to the point of
beginning; Except that part thereof lying westerly of the
existing centerline of CSAH No. 18; Except Roads; Subject to
Easements of Record.
"-
(__J
, "-
<)
"J
'h~'-~""''''''C''''',,_,
{ \
\.1.. ;'
-~- .j
'''':';~J:!~"
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular Planning and zoning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993
The Resularly Scheduled Andover Planning and zoning Commission
meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn at 7:30
p.m., Tuesday, september 14, 1993 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, MN.
Commissione~s Present:
Commissioners Absent:
Also present:
putnam, Jovanovich, Ape1, Peek, Squires
Pease
Dave Carlberg, City planner;
Todd Haas, Assistant City Engineer;
others
At this time, Chairperson Dehn introduced Jerry putnam, a new
member of the Commission.
Approval of Minutes - August 24, 1993
Mr. Carlberg noted that in the discussion regarding the propane
tank for Total Mart, the first paragraph should say "cars on the
edge of the parking lot along Crosstown" so that it doesn't sound
like cars' are parking on Crosstown Drive.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Jovanovich to approve the minutes of
August 24, 1993 as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearin /Amended S ecial use Permit/pro ane Stora e Tank/
Q-M~ west/Tota Mart
Mr. Carlberg explained that this item had been tabled at the
August 24th meeting to allow staff to research several items.
The first item was whether the propane tank would be allowed
within a setback. Mr. Carlberg noted that the city does allow
bulk storage tanks within the required building setback line.
The tank is considered temporary and is not required to meet the
building setback.
Commissioner Squires stated that at the last meeting berming was
discussed. He questioned whether berming would be allowed within
the setback. Mr. Carlberg noted that it is allowed. hr further
stated that the other item was the availability of the parking in
the area. He reported that there appears to be a surplus of
parking staffs on the northern part of the site. Staff does not
recommend eliminating any of the parking spaces for the service
station protion of the building. Relocating the tank to the
northern part of the site is not advisable as it would not be
visible from the register area of the store. He also noted that
the parking stalls are 9'x18' and our current ordinance requires
them to be 10'x18'. If they were to restripe the parking lot,
the stalls would need to be 10'x18'. Staff at this time cannot
recommend approval of the Amended Special use Permit.
- ,
.' )
\ --'
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 2
(Amended Special Use Permit, Cont.)
John Cross, Natroaas, asked if a smaller tank would
Mr. Carlberg note that the size of the tank is not
the problem is with the traffic flow.
be better.
the problem;
Dorothy Ritz, 2365 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, Q-Midwest questioned
whether the north portlon of the site just south of the entrance
would be an acceptable location. She explained that at their
other locations, only 5% of the propane business is RVs. Mr.
Carlberg felt that the first site is better.
Ms. Ritz noted that they have done tank exchanges in the past,
which would eliminate the storage tank. However, tank exchanges
are very expensive both for them and the consumer. The reason for
the 1000 gallon tank is economics. They could, however, go with a
500 gallon tank. She noted that the only other area they looked
at is the east side of the site. Mr. Carlberg stated that there
are four parking stalls on the east side and he would not like to
see them lose any parking spaces.
Commissioner Ape1 felt that the major concern is safety 'and that
has not been addressed to his satisfaction. At this time he could
not recommend approval.
. ~
~)
Commissioner Peek stated that the concern is
use, but with the configuration of the site.
Mart does, traffic problems will be created.
Ms. Ritz explained that during their grand opening, they had an
l8-wheeler parked where they propose to put this tank and it did
not interfere with the pumps.
not with the proposed
No matter what Total
Chairperson Dehn stated that her concern is the traffic on Cross-
town and Bunker. At this time we're talking about the tank being
30' from Crosstown. She asked what the State requirements are for
distance from a street. Mr. Carlberg noted that would be the
jurisdiction of the Fire Marshal. A permit for the tank from the
State is also required.
John Cross explained that they have numerous sites in the State,
one being in Royalton where the tank is in the right-of-way of
Highway 10. They also put a 2000 gallon tank at the intersection
of Highways 23 and 25 in Foley. They will do everything in their
power to ensure that no one hits the tank. They have insurance to
cover it in the event it is hit and their employees are trained in
the operation of the tank and are also given a video for their
use.
,~)
Commissioner Jovanovich didn't feel comfortable with the tank
being located in the corner of the site because of the traffic on
Crosstown and Bunker.
Chairperson Dehn asked if Staff would change their recommendation
if the tank were moved to the southern portion of the site. Mr.
Carlberg stated that he would like to see more drawings and have
the Fire Marshal look at it also.
~-)
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 3
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimmously.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Peek that the Andover,.Planning and
zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the
Amended Special Use Permit recommended by Q-Midwest for the
construction and placement of a propane tank for the purpose of
dispensing propane for the following reasons: 1) we discussed very
vociferously the health, safety and welfare aspects of it,
especially the safety. It is my opinion that if we move it south
closer to Bunker Lake on a site that shall be reviewed by the City
Planning Department and City Fire Marshal to make sure that the
site conforms with all the necessary setbacks we will have
resolved the safety factor.
There was a public hearing held; there was no opposition from the
floor. Make note also that the staff was not in favor of the
Special Use Permit as presented; however, with the change perhaps
they will change their mind. The applicant will provide exact
drawings to staff so that they can have the County look at the
sight lines.
Motion carried on a 4 yes
(Dehn, Jovanovich) vote.
October 5, 1993.
(Peek, Apel, Squires, Putnam), 2 no
This will go to the City Council on
. ,
Bou
Structure/17395 Hanson
~)
Mr. Carlberg noted that this is a Special Use Permit for the
construction of an accessory structure prior to the construction
of a principal structure on the property at 17395 Hanson Boulevard
NW. This is a 17 acre site and the applicants are proposing a
40'x60' pole building quite a distance from Hanson Boulevard. The
lot is zoned R-1, single family rural. The building will be for
storage purposes. The applicant has stated that they would build
the principal structure within a 3 year period. Mr. Carlberg
stated that he met with the Building Official on the time frame
and he stated that a 3 year period is not a reasonable time
period. A one year time period is more reasonable. The ones we
have done have all had a one year time period.
At this time Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
Commissioner Apel felt that we have a problem with the three year
time period. He asked the applicant if he would go with a one
year time period. The applicant asked if two years would be
satisfactory. Commissioner Apel stated no, a one year time period
is the maximum.
. \
~ )
_J
Max Fenna asked how much of the principal structure had to be
completed at the end of that one year. Mr. Carlberg noted that it
does not need to be complete, it just needs to be started.
Mr. Fenna stated that he could live with the one year period.
Midwest, Inc.
dba Total Mart. III
"--
2365 Commerce Blvd.' Mound, MN 55364' (612) 472-5921
September 18, 1993
Mr. Dave Carlberg
City Planner
City of Andover
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
>>ECEIVEn
SEP 20 1993
CITY OF No'
I~OOVER
Dear Mr. Carlberg,
I wa3 pleased to have an opport~~ity to meet you last evening at
the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and look forward to
working with you on issues pertaining to our Total convenience
store in Andover.
As you have requested, enclosed is a revised plan indicating the
new location for a propane tank as approved by the Planning
Commission. In addition to the existing berm, it is proposed to
place protective guard posts around the tank as indicated on the
" drawing. The tank, as positioned, would be approximately 30 feet
,-) from the Crosstown Blvd. right-of-way, 12 feet from the brand sign,
and 25 feet from the vent pipes.
It is my understanding that the location is pending the approval of
the local fire marshall to insure that local ordinances are being
observed, as well as, yourself as it relates to the positioning of
the tank relative to Crosstown Blvd. and Bunker Lake Road. The
Commission also requested that a copy of the plan be forwarded to
the County, which you stated that you would do.
Mr. John Cross of Natrogas, Inc. and I will be happy to meet with
you and/or the city officials at the proposed site at your con-
venience to assist in the process.
Please send (or FAX, 472-5991) a copy of any Planning Commission
meetings and Council meetings to my attention that will be
addressing this issue and we will have a representative present to
answer any questions.
~J
ThaniJou for your
, \1
Sln,c; ,8 y, I
' \~ 'v~1
DOr~~y K.B. kitz,
assistance.
Senior Vice President
cc: John Cross, Natrogas, Inc.
517
\,
,-)
,I
;
I
~
~
'-.
t..1
,
, \
'-)
~
~.
C1l
"-
il\.J
I
'~
C)
.
<n 'f Ct)
~ '~';;' I h-
e) 'N.
~.~::t
~ ~~.
C1l &~~
~ ry'OC)
~... ..
~ I........
~ : Oi
'1-, " I
'-_:! I,
~
,
:--
)J
~
'j.
C\
"
~
, l:)
'.
:s
:'i
~
f\I
..
-..-
-. '- "'---_.
~~
~
'X.
(')
~
~~
~
"'"
'Q'~
o ~
1-<;;'<>)' <>~..
"'.I-
Q/,..ca
Illw _
-\
-
-
C>
~
.. ..:.~ #0 ~_...
-, .
~ :~~...:s''''.'-''
\J\ ,
9?
.~ ---
'.,:..
V,
II
.:J
I
IG)
I
I
I (j)~'1
e ~!"
I ~ ~ ~
';i /.j ~
I' I
".
I,
I
'.' I
ft.
'r'
l, I
't
.I"
',! "
'\ "
~:
o
,..
'I
f
..;:~
~~~......
BSt)
.'--. ...
,.. . - dlsood' - .
, .
I
CO""'C'l"e,..p
[j>un,p b, J
v",.,( SI<(6
""5',.
J4."'kr O~"Pf'
...""
""0-
,"
<9.
~..xc;.
~....?
...;.....
V,
111
~
~
~
....
f\I
~
~
......
-;~
..,-
""0;
4 "SQ"~S~,.._v,
~~
~~
~~
'1'<
Oc;.. ~cP"""f!I
~.,. ~ "
" .A'o
C)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUESTF.OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 14, 1993
DATE
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Amended SUP
Propane Storage Tank
Q Midwest - Total Mart
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning .~
David L. carlber~
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at the
August 24, 1993 meeting pending further review by Staff. The
request is for an Amended Special Use Permit to install an above
ground storage tank for the bulk storage of liquid fuels (propane)
on the property located at 13725 Crosstown Drive NW, PIN 33-32-24-
13-0046. The applicant is Q Midwest.
STAFF FINDINGS
,-,
The Commission asked Staff to address the following issues.
1. Is the propane tank allowed within a setback?
The City does allow bulk storage tanks within the required
building setback line. The tank is considered temporary and not
required to meet the building setback.
,
2. What is the availability of the parking in the area?
This question was asked to determine whether a portion of the
parking spaces could be eliminated and the tank relocated to a
different location then being proposed. Staff in reviewing the
parking lot and spaces, does not recommend the elimination of any
spaces for the service station portion of the building. The video
portion of the building does have a parking area to the north and
a portion could be eliminated. However, this parking area would
be utilized if an addition was added to the existing structure.
Also, the tank location in this area would not be readily visible
from the register area.
GENERAL REVIEW
'-
Staff upon further review of the site is still very concerned with
the traffic patterns of the parking lot with the tank being
installed at the proposed location. Staff at this time must
recommend to the Commission denial of the Amended Special Use
Permit. Attached is a resolution for Commission review and
approval.
The Commission should bring to the meeting the packet materials
from the August 24, 1993 meeting.
~-)
, ~
,
~/
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF Q
MIDWEST, INC. D.B.A. TOTAL MART TO INSTALL A 1,000 GALLON ABOVE
GROUND STORAGE TANK FOR THE BULK STORAGE OF PROPANE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13725 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Q Midwest, Inc. d.b.a. Total Mart has requested
an Amended Special Use Permit to install a 1,000 gallon above
ground storage tank for the bulk storage of propane on the
property located at 13725 Crosstown Drive NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), legally described on Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request does not meet the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 and 4.26; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds if the
the request were granted it would have an adverse effect on the
health, safety and general welfare of the residents of Andover;
and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
request would have a negative impact on the trafiic conditions and
parking facilities; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no public
opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council denial of the Amended Special Use Permit
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and denys the request of Q Midwest
d.b.a. Total Mart to install a 1,000 gallon above ground storage
tank for the bulk storage of propane on the property located at
13725 Crosstown Drive NW, legally described on Exhibit A.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
5th day of October, 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victorla Volk, City Clerk
----
"
- ,
)
'-_/
CITY of ANDOVER
ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 24, 1993
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn on August 24,
1993, 7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW,
Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present:
Maynard Apel, Bev Jovanovich, Becky Pease,
Randy Peek, Jay Squires
None
City Planner, David Carlberg
Others
Commissioners absent:
Also present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 10, 1993:, Correct as written~
,
I
J
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Peek, approval of the Minutes as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT, PROPANE TANK (BULK STORAGE
OF LIQUID FUEL) - 13725 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-0046), Q
MIDWEST, INC., dba TOTAL HART
7:31 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the Amended Special Use Permit
requested by Q Midwest, Inc., dba Total Mart to install an above-ground
storage tank for the bulk storage of liquid fuels (propane) at 13725
Crosstown Drive NW. Staff is concerned about the location and access to
the tank. The tank would be located in a flat and open area; and
because of the curve on Crosstown Boulevard, there is a potential for it
to be hit by a vehicle. Also, when an RV would be filling at the
propane tank, it would be difficult for other vehicles to get through to
the gas islands because that area is so narrow. Mr. Carlberg had
pictures of the area and stated in viewing the site this evening, there
were quite a few cars parked along the~ of Crosstown Boulevard so
nothing could get through the parking lo~~ gel-suggested the Commission
also view the site as to the traffic flow through the parking lot. He
proposed if it is allowed, that berming around the tank be required
rather than concrete-filled posts to protect it from accidental contact
from Crosstown Boulevard.
<J
In discussing the item, those Commissioners familiar with the business
also expressed concerned that there isn't enough room for service from
both the proposed tank and the gas islands. Mr. Carlberg stated he
looked at other locations for the tank but could not find any because of
the limited space. Commissioner Peek asked if the ordinances allow such
a structure within the setback. Mr. Carlberg stated it would be about
30 feet from the road, but he will research that specific question. As
proposed, he felt it is a safety threat and a traffic problem.
"
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
) Minutes - August 24, 1993
'- r' Page 2
..0(
(Public Hearing:
Continued)
Amended Special Use Permit, Propane~, Total Mart,
.'
Representatives from Q Midwest, Inc., were not in attendance; so the
Commission preferred to table the item to address the safety concerns.
The Commission also asked Staff to check on the availability of parking
in the area. The public hearing was not opened.
MOTION by Apel, .Seconded by Pease, to table this item until Staff gets
a hold of the applicant and tells him the Commission's concerns. Motion
carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - AUTO REPAIR GARAGE IN AN I,
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, 2134 BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW - CLIFFORD MISTELSKE
, ,
'-)
7:44 p.m. ,Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request by Clifford Mistelske for
a Special Use Permit to operate a repair garage at 2134 Bunker Lake
Boulevard NW. Mr. Mistelske has been operating the garage without the
Permit, and Staff has been working with him to bring his business into
conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. The building is set way in back
of the lot, and he thought there is another structure in the back with
some type of construction and office space. There is no residence on
the parcel.
Chairperson Dehn opened the hearing for public testimony.
Clifford Mistelske - didn't realized he needed a permit when he started
a year ago. He works by himself repairing vehicles, trying to keep a
nice, quiet place. He's lived in Andover for 40 to 50 years and is just
trying to help the community. He does general vehicle maintenance,
mechanical, framing of cars, etc., getting them back to running again.
He buys and sells vehicles, cars, trucks, motor homes, as he finds them
and repairs them and does not advertise or solicit business from the
public.
Mr. Carlberg stated the biggest change will be having to meet the
parking requirements with hard surfaced parking and curbs. Mr.
Mistelske stated he didn't have many cars, probably not more than three
at anyone time. He does not keep junk cars. If vehicles come in with
parts he can use, he takes them apart and sends them back.
The Commission felt the requested use is appropriate for this area.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
:)
MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Apel, that the Special Use Permit be
approved with the first five of the six conditions listed in the Staff
report. I don't think it is necessary, given the nature of the
operation, to impose any hours of operation. Item 6, a public hearing
was held and there was no opposition. Motion carried unanimously. This
item will be on the September 21, 1993, City Council Agenda. 7:57 p.m.
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Amended SUP
Propane Storage Tank
Q Midwest - Total Mart
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Amended Special Use Permit requested by Q Midwest, Inc. d.b.a.
Total Mart to install an above ground storage tank for the bulk
storage of liquid fuels (propane) on the property located at 13725
Crosstown Drive NW, PIN 33-32-24-13-0046.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
'-
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.26, establishes the criteria for a
Special Use Permit for all uses associated with the bulk storage
of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals and similar
liquids. By requiring a Special Use Permit, the City has some
assurance that fire, explosion or water or soil contamination
hazards are not present that would be detrimental to the public
health, safety and general welfare.
Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 regulates the Amended Special Use Permit
process, outlining conditions and procedures.
GENERAL REVIEW
The requested Amended Special Use Permit is for the installation
of an above ground storage tank for propane. The proposed tank
will have a 1,000 gallon capacity. The tank will be required to
be installed per State guidelines.
Staff is concerned with the placement of the tank near
Crosstown Drive NW and the potential for it to be hit by an
automobile. The installation of concrete filled posts should
protect the tank from accidental contact, but the Commission
should discuss the location of the tank and the safety concerns.
" /
Page Two
Amended Special Use Permit - Q Midwest
, Storage Tank (propane)
''-_) 13725 Crosstown Drive NW
August 24, 1993
COMMISSION OPTION
A. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit requested by Q
Midwest d.b.a. Total Mart to install a 1,000 gallon above ground
propane tank on the property located at 13725 Crosstown Boulevard
NW.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.26 and 5.03.
B. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council denial of the Amended Special Use Permit requested by Q
Midwest d.b.a. Total Mart to install a 1,000 gallon above ground
propane tank on the property located at 13725 Crosstown Boulevard
NW.
c. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending
further information from Staff.
RECOMMENDATION
, \
,__J Staff recommends approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
requested by Q Midwest d.b.a. Total Mart to install a propane tank
with the following conditions:
1. The applicant provide to the City, in writing, proof that the
tank meets all State requirements and regulations.
2. The request be subject to a sunset clause as specified in
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
3. The Andover Fire Marshal review the tank and its placement.
4. The request be subject to annual review by City Staff.
5. Other conditions established by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Staff has attached a resolution for Commission review and
approval.
- "
" ./
,
, )
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
Q MIDWEST, INC. D.B.A. TOTAL MART TO INSTALL A 1,000 GALLON ABOVE
GROUND STORAGE TANK FOR THE BULK STORAGE OF PROPANE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13725 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Q Midwest, Inc. d.b.a. Total Mart has requested
an Amended Special Use Permit to install a 1,000 gallon above
ground storage tank for the bulk storage of propane on the
property located at 13725 Crosstown Drive NW (PIN 33-32-24-13-
0046), legally described on Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 and 4.26; and
,
~-)
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission to allow for the installation of a
1,000 gallon above ground storage tank for the bulk storage of
propane on the property located at 13725 Crosstown Drive NW,
legally described on Exhibit A with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide to the City, in writing,
proof that the tank meets all State requirements and
installation regulations.
2. The Amended Special Use Permit will be subject to a
one (1) year sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.
8, Section 5.03(D).
3. The Andover Fire Marshal inspect the tanks and their
installation.
4. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
21st day of September, 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
. ,
~J
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
:~)
\
I
,-/
, "
\..J
EXHIBIT A
That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section
33, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as
follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said South
Half 1536 feet West of the Southeast Corner thereof, thence North
at right angles to said South line 227.84 feet (said South line
having an assumed bearing West), thence North 30 degrees 09
minutes East 109.99 feet to intersect with a line drawn North 59
degrees 51 minutes West from point "A" said point "a" being on a
line drawn perpendicular to said South line from a point 1426 feet
West of the Southeast Corner of said South Half (as measured along
said South line) and 291.15 feet North of said South line (as
measured along said perpendicular line), thence North 59 degrees
51 minutes West to a point on the center line of CSAH No. 18
(Crosstown Drive NW) said point being 302.97 feet from said point
"An, thence South 30 degrees 37 minutes, 55 seconds West 515.22
feet tQ said line, thence East along said line to the point of
beginning; Except that part thereof lying westerly of the
existing centerline of CSAH No. 18; Except Roads; Subject to
Easements of Record.
-".""::
,J,p ',.: ',' ~:J:,/::::; . ',;".: ,,':::~. ',',..': ;-:: ,"-..:' ,.:::' ,'." ,[ '::' :" '<':"::'''~I -:-:...J 1-_
'. "I:~" ':'o;':;":',','7,,:=?::<,: :,~' :',:.::::,~,..,:".:''''''::''''::'','',).<'.''.':'','',,':,)1'>"''-,:" :,.;', :,. .. t-{J(Vt)lP
. ....... . ..... ..",. 'I' . ". . . . , '. I . . .' .... .' ,. z \ .
'.' ..... .:'-.!.; .': ':.:'.~ ':~........:::..:.':.~. ," ,-...................:.;..,...:..'..... ,','" ',' ~Q
. , .,'. ,."",," , ,... .,.,,":. ..,'..', " " '....' ,I, .. ',' ""', "':">--:5::-("'.
~;':;~f~~'r~~~~-_ ~~~...'..,';;'("'" 'i:"'."';,~!zt
".,;?",W" i ,.r, ,.' ;', ;', '.>:, - __ ^~ =-."J ' " :
I , ' ..........".... ...,~, II """"'- 'I
-.c ~ ' , 1-"'" '. ',: . ....... ')' "'" "
. i....,....." .w""- ("h""'o:J.~ r- "..~
---='~,,~-.!~..' . , :" , ...... I~. d .~\
.~'-I....Y""..4I"-' ......1"-- f#<<4 _1-. ,.~.,~.......... """IIlIII~ .. 4
-, _J'~~ ..t:;,~({ ~:.'tif'l'7.'.-r-- ~/',,;""!il - '""'T1'('.li:t:il....."'t!Gi~., ", "
I ~J:l;t;j.f)_, ~-;..;.,. i,!"'" I; ''1'Ioi.:. ~~~;M:fi~'\tl 'P.....:; __ ' ,.
..#!!':1"r1i'~D'~' ! I 1 I I J : -:- ~$ ,~', ":;-Z'b-"':-' ' :' ~ ' --':
~;~ l'fJ "':: ...<, '.. j ~ v' ~ .. ~~.1'" - ~.. _ ~
~~,..~;.:::".r~.. ':'.' "\',ii I I i -.J: .~~~:~tI ftTd,~'~ ~.'''~~'~~~......P_-;~v.: .~,
........ \' ! ' 1 I I ~/ltJ: ~ ..oo/r:JO IJI J(5 . '-".~t"'::..: ,
... ' '", R I" !. ';",'" '"-'/"-,,,'>li.!'l. ~- '.
'~;? ......', ,,,', _' I '--:'\'. <,): '.I ~~b. ,Ifi,~ ~/, ~. , ~' . "":. :
,', "l ~ 'J~:-I'I' ';.!!" t;: OC)-u- 6 "'~,;.t'
I.UC ',\' ',\',' I --- I -, ~O ":. ~.Z2zT~i i.~"' ':....., : rl:.',
/' ',. .,:1.. , 'NOll: ~ r.. JI ~> . 'w
. , ' . \\- ...:. ,I I f I;, ~~p.>~'" >;" ~;~ '\~' 'I. /<:"~"'~ ~
' , I 1 1/ '1-'/. ",.." ~ ~ I" ~ . 'L.!...HE;I! ~KS1
~-S5 ,\ ' ).;:. . ~.,o.~.!J, ~ L L'" ;-,_
',. ," '.' '..., ...' ..' '.:.'~, ~/~; C~p "1:?~~ ".1."" > 'J
I I I .'._"~ . ." '.' .., ..' li'~,) .~~~~' .'J.' .
1 =0 , ., . :: ....' '. ",' .~...: ........ '. ..>" ~" . ~~i..,i >~re~p~.O'8
I =,"":'" -~~tBr:';';51 I, .;.:.: -:' .' ..':., ,...>..:. ':', ; 5/;~' ,~~il"~v.YKENS~4 ~d~ '''r' ':;:;~
l 1 fil..~' :_",..<.- ....., ~ '.;:: ,.. . ....' _ . . ':~ J ... ~.aI~L.1/2.;:P:;~JI...&l11 .'" ,
! --;- ~ 0.4. .....r . .__-:-:_"':._.~ ~. . . ,;... , /in-. r""r. -1 ,Q~ I ~ ~
~' .---, J' , I:' I I - '" '. . , . .' : I, ,', . ., ,. : ': ~r.!:.f' , , ' ,tKENSlNIiTIlf', (A
;I., _J. I... . I j '" : .. .: ..' . -;' : -1'.:- :'. - . . :, .'. ~~I;'~ 5 'f ~ ,.:' ~ ... ~
' ; :.lSAI/T",S 1 I iiI/UN ,0, ':'. .... .;:'.'::.... :::'.' lor"'." '. II~!.I.: _,,~~I
~ ~I" . r- ". '. '. .... ,I. ......, _.' . . '-0;"", A'.ifATEIi. -' "_I..
' .. '. ''''CRE'~ ....,.,~ '. ". . '. I' .'.~. ",:,..,. .... //, ~~r-'"
fa.'''~'. ,; i I I" ro::- :: ':'. ........ . "'" '. ':..: ':." ',.:. ."" '.~, ~~~/, lI.11~OOITlON .:,:,;\ ~
~)' ,., '-1. r .I~,II - "I'I.J".":..., I 'V/ '1~""ll.. I\-::;) /,\,\'!'i""'\ ~,
! r ....~;- . , , -//;7:" '1l' - .f, ,\,--~ . '" ... "-
~.. ....). . ~.' 4 ",..1..1'" ,.1.. ..1_' , I I ,.... ,_" J ..... ;;,...... II..., 'i ".
'7f,ir:f-:l i$_~, =:, - . y, . ...... , ,_ ~ ",.'r-. '_
~'~ I, ".:'1~&.}.. 'J {..I.! ill r It "'I-tl'jlf' ,--. /,,, ,J ,:",:,:,~..lo' J -=-r-;. ~'~ ....... ..-
J' " 'I';~' ,,~ ' , . .," .",' , ,- ',,';- !3Iii' ..... ~ ',!.' '11' . '...:' -=-
" ':;"'Ii' . -', " " ,- . rr-:-t ~f'l..:. '.r=-~ irEj;~I'O~KS.::'.-=-
\ i It-'~ ' , I/OP.ITlr:W"'?J'b ':.i.: '-7 !, -;-t "'-L..oft<-~'~,f~I';--=- ~;!:~. t<,;E.' . i.
I .(,11' ",. . ~ .' .....rt~-0:..' ' ." g.,~"': .:sJ:':~' :;-,z;- '" ,,^ -
, '(:',11 .II ...I.!,!-~* .'iJ: ' ~..... ~......J':'~l"~ _ ,--'0 (._0
! ...... .. J ,2' ~ ,-:,"1"''''. . ~')"( ~I 3-1 ~':~', 'I~~~ r- ~~ . '.- ")-'3" .E':
I \ "-'" 'Pi.t.Ar;~f ~I ..1.,11 __. ,~, f,o,.7"!:,I.I. :'!~.')...,~": .
- ,- _.\- - i-T ~~"!'1 .,,,, , " ~ f.j.~~;:\,"I.:::::-"r-'-- _ _ _ _ _ __
~ ~ - t '~~;-!' t-I ,,,,,,,Q,/f..or c f,,'.~N. -i ~6' ;"JULZ: l-
I ::--:- ' ., .:;2'" " ,......- J H;~ n"--..; l\. ,
, it ~ ~ ...;. 1'" ~ '.' \ \' , (;" "1,,,,,'/,,1. f{;~ :4T}l.-A()[J.~ f7
I I ,:>:: J 'i~~'I.' . , ~~ O.,I~ -fT,,..;. ,.r';;.I,.,..:::-:;- t-;- /\
4 I' ~ ~ O/) J "',. "- I REu'.)-,:(i ~ }'. . '1" .u ... ~...;.. ....
- I'~'CR Ku,:..J'.1<' ~(,... ~, OAK,:,,_', M:D ~J ' l--.I.I",",,''''.8',,~ . \,
I _UM.:r\~~ <l ~". 2';;F:.':')~ /I~I ~'" II" I/ANfJ!.>7 ,:. ;:~5'flED''''''
..,... 1 '..... .,. ........ I - lJ. 5.J J, ~, ~I --- J '2:" I "
-.. I i '(~ ~ ,'. ' . . ;'.. I' IR":"'::'-\;::;; 'AOL ~ ~ ,: ;: 'I':', -~l; I LlI/8
('J_ I I ":x~ ~. 11111 b AJr~' I '-'... ..,,,. 2'. I
=: ~.... t:\... w... I 1-'" 1 I~~_r.. I !zlJ:3,)1~1}' 'fTt'...1 .',!DgITI?^, _ _ _ _ _u_
....
17~, I,,,. 6 '~,~~tt~8J#l;JN~ ~~BHl ~,,~ ! L III. ~
7;1," ,. - t ~ V.e,ViEUL' ~, 1m i 4:' m "r ~ -+ .!~'oP~~ _14NPO R I '
'. l/) .r",.,,.,....,,E:7- 0 ~. , L!.l~4fK -r . , ~". ~ ' . . ,
,'/ ,.~6 .:; \' ~ ,"~:.\~I,I.I,i.MT;~T"~ '~{.".; , I:
, I~'~ ,'pro;' LIT:; ~ .'~! ~\':~'~"'~,I.I,I.I,(..'...:4:.: ;: "'."~ ~~~, "".' f- I r W.to
" ",-, /lmiF'r/' " U" '8 I~;\ , ~~/'~ ~ .':.." r'~'~~ i(u ,-:t::: -.j; ;;--, _
: t'T! f/a>uNT~ '~STATCS. ...~, ~ ~'1'\T' /'"C E. ,..,. /ZNO -1q;Q.- "'" ,P~K I .
:, . .. {':;~.,.b- f 1J''''~~/I..-.iJ 2J _J
~' ~ ~o 102 '..~'I'T' 35 ~:Q ?/I. ~1"~HIz:> '1'" ,
, '~"Y~~iAO"I' .... ~ ~ ~ ". /,l.\',.i~, ~ A
' f"'o..\" ,-1. ,..,,, 4 , . "'o'~ If' ..1,. ~;j~~ , ~I 'Ll t
'i~ ,- \;;H :~' "., ~ r, ~j; ~'.,'l\:C:" -"- :'>.1 ,j,^-, ;',)-;.. ,",.~'..
., t'" \ l- ~~':;::::;. > AS~ R -;; ~..~ I I ~lY'. /l\ r,' ,......ftI7-J r,w':O'.J T
i; \.1 ' -" ., ~',ToRJj c. '.iI, "DO .. Dc'--1-t-.r,y-z '... l;Y; Y "T(I',J/J iI ...._.N1I'I..,~. .
, J ,II~ . ,"~, 0- 'illl 1.7"<""'--'17 ,....- 1J
.I 's:J.,~ ~ .Q~2 ~i/!..:.! ~I I l'.JI/IIIII/I1'I. , r:J I T ~- 1
/ " "" (I : ~ G. : ~ ... ; 'I- ~.. '!'~'\h"I' lJ '!it ~ id! lTi~fKi 'j-r4 :~'~f~~~ I~" , A C
~ L~ .~~i~- -0 ' -j ~ ~ lCJ.! .,,'?lI. '~""jA/JI)I"'()N.V
(\;; \4, . , ~ 1I0,,~' r [' ~. 'I.. "~.. "1"'''4 ,. " ...,_. ro"". ~';.' I~ " I;; ~__'_
~ ) r;- "r' . ~ . .:1~ 1-'";, . '""." t-.'~ I ' ~ \\~~~O:ER BOUNDAR
'.J 'r' ~'. ~ ,I I I " .~&~ .~"."I"I.."'1'"'.\''' ~~ ~ .l ""'T ':.... /..... , /-
t ~ I': 111 All Mli--- ~ --. / '
...,.- - -.,-- - I -Q...~r - '-- - ..UUA. II
NB L en""'",- OF C=::.\/) F:~,/.:.Y.'nY:;:, ,.:\j'.KJi-:::!.\ GG,\ ___
~..,.._......_..-__...__.._ ........ r ..... .. ....._ .._ _ ,. .._._.~____ ..._'_ .~_ --:.
R-
~:"'.......-."-.~ .
" . - '~" --- "'_.,-~ ' -, I '~." "'1
~, '-./'1: ti~~~III'il ~,!I L -., -".- -''''''1 r ~N-J""" : f-1"I'~"":
\.. j ~,1' "'~~--- '.' \.\
::,,'=-- ~" _~ I .._ _n I Hl"I~'" : ; ,-~ I I k
, .' . . !.:. ,~v. ~'.~,...u:-i;j'(,!,'- 't- I I U II
,I ~"---r-'-- . _ ~-; '..~JIJi_^'I'U) tU1,-O '/:..... : ~
',' / r ~: ~I'~ ~ ,:-:-, :-_-.-."~ 1- ,.:z.w-~~': :c''''', ~ - '~1'1f11. . H'o' W~.,.. ,{(, Ii'"
-.... 10 )l~~r;; W'I~ .,~ \:!;~= _'f' ..... .. ';"'"1 1(1_1 ::s
I _-,'/,o O~ ....40) 5,'11.1fi~:"'._ ;_~_ ---! j~: I if
.'CJ- ~6~C!:._1 S ~i"'.......~ 6 ~-~' . ...vl!.~~ ,b,'!: ~... . . I _ I" A.I r ~~~ __. I I
:::.....e.o~ ~ea.'- ). . ~'-o- 1 I t--4~D X ~.o f,~~O 1 .n.. I I
~..::e-~ - - - - - -.,.... - -' -':' ..;i i "
~.T ~:;.U~ .. __ ""o""e.~ &.rnSZ,e:. ~~il""'~ J
~-.: -~. ;;=:.,.. ___.._,J i ~~~.AA"e."E'" t' f-1i'3:
~i":'I''l P,iJ'o~1ct' oP'Je- _ _ ,
. ",'...",." '/,:}.)'~r'LI_ I~:..:/I 2__-;0'"
" -L'I""I'J'')'~I'" i----ft.ll...1t"'~.,v\fJi~-"'" ._._..~!.__~~.. ~.__~_ __,
I..... \;' hl ~1-10u(l. N.I.~. I - - .r ,
. ......,.. v \
if - f~-- - - - ,- - -, ;- -- - -, -;_ e~,,'~ ,"J01.~tJ''t,~ - II I
~~~~'l./ -'~'-~k-t'-'I~ .,~Lf>'>; r.:- ._'=~-;' 'I, ~~~J1'~~ \ z'..,' _,~_ i I
;; " t~, - ,'I' t!t~rH"el' I ,,,...~, ~lZ.,...,&~,_~
0_.1 ~..... I I 1'37:0. I
~~...t'l>. -:'.1....,;-; "-","'J L_ - - - - - - - - i . -.,. \\n;! ' ~~~;~, ~
I~~:D----- -"", - -~-f~ w;"~'--?\Ii/',.f Vtlulc -l~,t Vl't,:I'.., tM4-10l" 13~) J ,'~;~: ~~~~ :;aw
,,n -.......... /<:..-t/-___ -~-f4 ,,"A~H f. I'bo\o"~... __ __~ _ _, ",,-=___/1 t;: , ,"','
........ ..................., '-'-. ~.--.:";>Oo,.. -, :--, - -- -:.Jl.l-~ ~---='-~. ~ <IIi=-U. - ~~:---' '"'," " ,'V'",: '. "1
~1__:.;.~W....-:~ _ ~ ~. ,.,.oj~
..-,~......,,'1"t.-=:---=
,'..,::.r..os. ' . ~ .. ~ .' 1- ...e.... ~~IJ ..
'. oil" .. - P . ..... ::'"7":e.r.sL::lT.
.v , I _,
,0:,... . .L. 4'.0' ...i.Si;AC1! _. I
-- -;.:~' 0.\ e:;.~ ~::!':1 P"
'--.._af eeP1<t----== .r~l'~ ~,~~,
"--uto ! "L.
,
...............
,
,I-
- -0.__-
...,.----.'
'.
,
"
j-:,'-i
\ I
I
-1
"'C
a:
a:
~
Ct:
-!
<> i
~ I
Jto
...
a;
~
'I::
-
-
aJ
t
'"
1!:.
-rZ4" ~l-llfAe-r
5 : ,
w
~
M.~,
Zoned R-4
"
'-..-/
\
HUu-l~-~j IHU lU:~4
a8/11/g~ a8:~2 ~A1 812 472 Baal
,-
AUG-es-l~ !.4:U. F@Jl'l eny a: ~
JU.-2ii'-2.w,s 111:>b I-I<I.A'I \011 T \11'" ~
t'H;( NU,012tJ281o35
Q )!IDWllST. IlIe.
P,lJ2- - -
~aa~
TO
.4'1':0991
P.G
'..
,........-
o
1fS!:.-=-- -
(~:'
~... .
-.,.~..;
--~..,
DECEIvED
CrrYofANDOVEB AUS~6~~
~.llGS alCSSTOWN IOf,iLEVAAO N.W,' ANOO't'~, frIINNea~~ ~m~AO
..
SPKdu.r. un JBlUlrl! '.
~:o.,e:ty A~dnu (~7,,;}.S' C~S"f~""'" 1./'"\ /ZL,v_
~,~.~ CQAQ~1p~lQn o! ~=~:trt
(7:i.I.1 111 'Ifhiezhe.""Q~ lA ap~l!~dll~"') I
~~ ~loc~ ~dit1oa
nt; ,/;1~ ,~J4 I~ a?7'-' (U llletel and D\)\lJ,;&;, llUach th,
o eemplQta 19~.l 4.&~ri~\1~n.)
IS 'c.h1J p::o~:tt, ~at::llot .' or fO:l:~!U ~ (t'h:!.Jl
lA~=atiOD. DUSt. be "tovS-Qed anu ~m be a~i21e~ 2:2:02& t:Jio dcunty.)
}'
....
~MMMN__~._"'4~~N~"~~NN~_._---~~._~~~A.H~W~~~---_.~~----~~_M.~
ne$ec~ for Rt~~S~
J}~^~
I.,~
~P/J.
)J,>;a,~
-
.-
"",,"L
)
\.--'
. . '10.'
-
Sac:thD Oe OI~n!,neQ ~ l/. Job. tc~u.u~XI.~ Z9nlJl.~ t)O
I
_____~__M_.M.W~-_~N..~-.~~-.M~M~-"~W.8-~-~-MM---.~*..~~w--..._~.---
HU.I e:E .AppU~a:1b d:.~~ 9x.:., ~~ t;io I ~~;.."
Add:au ~"!6S ~)ooo,.-f'}'"<=. 4/Vt/ -M~~ ~/V . ~'S~I'>-
,..,.. >h"'~ ~....i.... ..... V;1- S9~ :
'.l._~.", -z ._~z ...t. 2A ._7 .
___.~_..N__._."~~ ~~~N.~__.____M .__~._.___._*-...w.~~.--_.-~~.~~~..
1'rop~r:ty O\f!l.IU~ (re~ OwnoU ~ Cr.
(::! ~"',U~t:e:nt f~c= a~) "
AtI.an~o A't'.. ~ :>'I/! 7 ~t."e4)1~fi}?bAr- $S1f~r
s=! !1l0M .;"'$~=~U ?hcmo !",;>?"4~6 ;;l2---) ,
Sl,~~u~o' .-,- r-s::(..'H~S ~'mOIA'.1 l'ate 7/~)J ,-
~--.H_N~.~.~ --~. :t~ ~____~_~___~_______.___~____M~~
1:;;'/ ! J.,,' ~'"
, (. w'
'\
'-J'
'g'-. J). -? 3
AUG-09-1993 14:12 FROM CITY OF ANDOUER
JUL-29-1993 11:56 FROM CITY OF ANDOUER
TO
TO
4725991 P.03
47259'='l1 ..., ~~
"
"-
,I ,
~/SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
Tha following information shall be submitt~d prior to r~view by the
City of Andover: ~
1.
A ;caled drawin9 of the property and stru~tures affected
~howing~ seale and north arrow; dimensions of the property a~d
structures; front, side and rear yard buildinq s9tbac~s,
adjaoent streets, and locath~n~n~use of existing structures
within 100 fQ~t. ~ ~~
The namQ~ and addresses of ada)l rop rty owners within 350 faet
of the subject property.
~
2.
Application rees:
CO!ll%llQrcial
, :aeddent:.i.al
A1I1ended SUP
R.eording F..
$190.00
$CitiPs 0 .
$ .00
$ 20.
l)llt. Paid
S!t3/q3
I I
Raeeipt t
41&8Z-
,/ -'Rev. S~06-93:d'A
'--'Ru. 179-91 (11-05-91)
i . ~. .
CRXTERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USB PEaKlTS
!n granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall conside: the
advice and r.commendation of the Planninq and Zon1nq Commission and:
1. The ef!ec~ of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare o! occupants of surroundinq lands.
2. Existing and an~ieipated traffic conditions including parkinq
facilitios on adjacent .treets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic viewG in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the propoRed use on the Comprehenaive Plan.
-
, \
'--..J
TOTAL P,D3
'_/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON
DATE October 5, 1993
AGENDA
f\O.
SECTION
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
~
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
f\O.
Special Use Permit
Accessory Structure
17395 Hanson Blvd. NW
Dirk Fenna
David L. Carlberg,
City Planner
BY:
.:1.
REQUEST
'-)
The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on
September 14, 1993, reviewed the request for a Special Use Permit
by Dirk Fenna to construct a 40' x 60' accessory structure (pole
building) prior to the construction of a principal structure on
the property located at 17395 Hanson Boulevard NW. The property
is 17+ acres in size and is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural.
Please consult the attached staff report dated September 14, 1993
and the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
approval of the Special Use Permit request with conditions. A
resolution is attached for Council approval.
\
</
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
- ,
.~)
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF DIRK
FENNA TO CONSTRUCT A 40' x 60' ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (POLE BUILDING)
PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 17395 HANSON BOULEVARD NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT
A.
WHEREAS, Dirk Fenna has requested a Special Use Permit to
construct a 40' X 60' accessory structure (pole building) prior to
the construction of a pril.cipal structure on the property legally
described on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance 8, Section 5.03, including: 1) the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of
the community; 2) the use will not depreciate the surrounding
property; 3) the use will not cause serious traffic congestion or
hazards; 4) the use is in harmony with the comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, The Commission finds the use meets the criteria
of Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, Accessory Structures; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission on the request and there was no public
~_) opposition; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & zoning Commission and approves the request of Dirk
Fenna to construct a 40' x 60' accessory structure (pole building)
prior to the construction of a principal structure on said
property with the following conditions:
1. The applicant place tre structure in accordance with the
minimum setback requirements of the designated zoning district.
2. The applicant place the structure so as to accommodate the
future placement and construction of a principal structure.
3. The principal structure be constructed within a one year
period of the approval of the Special Use Permit by the City
Council.
~)
4. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset clause as
defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
5th day of October, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
f ..
I
_ I
.
.
j
, .
-/
,
1 ..
EXHIBIT A
That part of the west 560.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as
measured along the north line thereof, lying southerly of the north
578.00 feet thereof, as measured along the west line thereof, lying
easterly of the west 66.00 feet thereof, as measured at right
angles to the west line thereof and lying northerly of the
following described line:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the East Half of said
Southwest Quarter; then North 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds West,
assumed beaz;ing, along the west line of said East Half of the
Southwest Quarter, a distance of 901.97 feet to the point of
beginning of the line to be described; thence South 86 degrees 09
mintues 19 se~onds West, a distance of 639.49 feet; thence
southwesterly a distance of 397.44 feet along a curve not tangent
to the last described line, said curve being concave to the
northwest, having a radius of 437.06 feet, a central angle of 52
degrees 06 minutes 06 second and the chord of said curve bears
South 28 degrees 29 minutes 14 seconds West; thence South 54
degrees 32 minutes 17 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 64.42 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential
~~rve, concave to the northwest, having a radius of 256.04 feet and
a central angle of 51 degrees 50 minutes 48 seconds, a dist~~ce of
231.69 feet; thence westerly along a reverse ~~rve, concave to tte
\ south, having a radius 'of 466.02 feet, a central angle of 16
,~_) degrees 58 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 138.04 feet; thence
South 89 degrees 24 minutes 48 seconds west, tangent to said curve,
a distance of 16.38 feet to the east line of the west 66.00 feet of
said Southwest Quarter, as measu:,ed at right angles to tte west
~ine thereof, and said ~ine there terminating.
I")
!
Subject to the right-of-way of County State Aid Highway No. 78 per ANOKA COUNTY
HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY NO. 23, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Subject to other valid easements, if any.
-- .,.......--
'-.----.-..
_._~c"~'~.
-_.-'':;-~:7.
.-'~=:-.
-',~,:
,
, )
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 4
Ma'erle, 17582 Hanson Boulevard was concerned that the pole
lng woul not become an eyesore. He noted that they have put
up a fence and are painting it right now so they are taking
measures to keep the property looking nice and he hopes they keep
it that way.
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Apel to close the public hearing.
Motion carried.
MOTION by Squires, seconded by Jovanovich that the Andover
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of a Special Use Permit requested by Dirk Fenna for the
construction of an accessory structure prior to the construction
of a principal structure on the property located at 17395 Hanson
Boulevard NW.
A public hearing was held and there was no opposition. The
Commission finds that the request meets the criteria established
in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: 1) the use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare
of the community; 2) the use will not depreciate the surrounding
property; 3) the use will not cause serious traffic congestion or
hazards; 4) the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the use meets the provisions
specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, Accessory Structures.
- -.
~I Approval of the request is contingent upon the following
conditions: 1) the applicant place the structure in accordance
with the minimum setback requirements of the designated zoning
district; 2) the applicant place the structure so as to
accommodate the future placement and construction of a principal
building; 3) the principal structure be constructed within a one
year period of the approval of the Special Use Permit by the City
Council; 4) the Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
Motion carried on a 5 yes (Jovanovich, Squires, Dehn, Apel,
Putnam), 1 no (Peek) vote. This will go to the City Council on
October 5, 1993.
Public Hearing/Preliminary Plat/Wittington Ridge/Ashford
Development Corporation
\
~)
Todd Haas, Assistant City Engineer reviewed the request noting
that the property is located at l55th and Nightingale Street which
is zoned R-1, which would allow for this proposed development,
consisting of 21 single family lots. The Andover Review Committee
remarks are as follows: The proposed plat is currently not within
the Metropolitan Urban Service Area; however, a portion of the
proposed plat could be served with gravity sanitary sewer. The
developer will be responsible to obtain all necessary permits,
including the DNR, LGU, MPCA, etc.
The Andover Review Committee is concerned with the two proposed
locations of the proposed streets. The developer is proposing to
extend the road to the west end of the property line. The Review
Committee is concerned with the length of the street as it is over
~
'J
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 3
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimmously.
"
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Peek that the Andover.'Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the
Amended Special Use Permit recommended by Q-Midwest for the
construction and placement of a propane tank for the purpose of
dispensing propane for the following reasons: 1) we discussed very
vociferously the health, safety and welfare aspects of it,
especially the safety. It is my opinion that if we move it south
closer to Bunker Lake on a site that shall be reviewed by the City
Planning Department and City Fire Marshal to make sure that the
site conforms with all the necessary setbacks we will have
resolved the safety factor.
There was a public hearing held; there was no opposition from the
floor. Make note also that the staff was not in favor of the
Special Use Permit as presented; however, with the change perhaps
they will change their mind. The applicant will provide exact
drawings to staff so that they can have the County look at the
sight lines.
Motion carried on a 4 yes
(Dehn, Jovanovich) vote.
October 5, 1993.
(Peek, Apel, Squires, Putnam), 2 no
This will go to the City Council on
)
~)
Public Hearin /Soecial Use Permit/Accessor Structure/17395 Hanson
Bou evard NW/Dirk Fenna
Mr. Carlberg noted that this is a Special Use Permit for the
construction of an accessory structure prior to the construction
of a principal structure on the property at 17395 Hanson Boulevard
NW. This is a 17 acre site and the applicants are proposing a
40'x60' pole building quite a distance from Hanson Boulevard. The
lot is zoned R-1, single family rural. The building will be for
storage purposes. The applicant has stated that they would build
the principal structure within a 3 year period. Mr. Carlberg
stated that he met with the Building Official on the time frame
and he stated that a 3 year period is not a reasonable time
period. A one year time period is more reasonable. The ones we
have done have all had a one year time period.
At this time Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
Commissioner Apel felt that we have a problem with the three year
time period. He asked the applicant if he would go with a one
year time period. The applicant asked if two years would be
satisfactory. Commissioner Apel stated no, a one year time period
is the maximum.
Max Fenna asked how much of the principal structure had to be
completed at the end of that one year. Mr. Carlberg noted that it
\ does not need to be complete, it just needs to be started.
)
~ ,
Mr. Fenna stated that he could live with the one year period.
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
September 14, 1993
AGENDA ITEM
4. Public Hearing
Special Use Permit
Accessory Structure
17395 Hanson Blvd. NW
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
Plannin~
David L. Carlberg ~
BY: City planner
BY:
REQUEST -
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by Dirk Fenna to construct a 40' x
60' accessory structure (pole building) prior to the construction
of a principal structure on the property located at 17395 Hanson
Boulevard NW, legally described on Exhibit A.
The lot to be constructed upon is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
~ )
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 states that, "No accessory building
or use shall be constructed or developed on a lot prior to the
time of construction of the principal building except by Special
Use Permit".
Section 4.05 also states that, "No permanent sheet metal, painted
or unpainted accessory building, except small garden sheds not
exceeding one hundred twenty (120) sq. ft., shall be allowed on
parcels of three (3 a.) acres or less in all residential
districts...".
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be
examined.
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land.
\
\- /'
Page Two
, SUP - Accessory structure
\ j 17395 Hanson Boulevard NW
Dirk Fenna
September 14, 1993
3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive plan
GENERAL REVIEW
The applicant has stated that the structure is to be used for
storage purposes. The applicant is planning to construct
the principal structure within three (3) years.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
1. The Planning and zoning Commission may approve the Special Use
Permit requested by Dirk Fenna to allow for the construction of an
accessory building prior to the construction of a principal
building on the prope~ty located at 17395 Hanson Boulevard NW,
legally described on Exhibit A.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
r ~ Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
~_) detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions
or hazards; the use will not depreciate the surrounding property
and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive plan. The
Commission also finds that the use meets the provisions specified
in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, Accessory structures.
2. The Planning and zoning Commission may deny the Special Use
Permit requested by Dirk Fenna to allow for the construction of an
accessory building prior to the construction of a principal
building on the property located at 17395 Hanson Boulevard NW,
legally described on Exhibit A.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 and 4.05. In denying
the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing
so.
3. The Planning and zoning Commission may table the item.
"
If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the request,
Staff recommends the following conditions be added:
1. The applicant place the structure in accordance with the
minimum setback requirements of the designated zoning
district.
,-/J
2. The applicant place the structure so as to accommodate the
future placement and construction of a principal building.
3. The principal structure be constructed within three (3) years
of the approval of the Special Use Permit.
f ,.
!
I
,
.
i
,
I
\.
~)
, i
" /
,-
i
';'-i;-;"
l' .
EXHIBIT A
That part of the west 560.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as
measured along the north line thereof, lying southerly of the north
578.00 feet thereof, as measured along the west line thereof, lying
easterly of the west 66.00 feet thereof, as measured at right
angles to the west line thereof and lying northerly of the
following described line:
...
,-
"
Commencing at the southwest corner of the East Half of said
Southwest Quarter; then North 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds West,
assumed bea2;ing, along the west line of said East Half of the
Southwest Quarter, a distance of 901.97 feet to the point of
beginning of the line to be described; thence South 86 degrees 09
mintues 19 se~onds West, a distance of 639.49 feet; thence
southwesterly a distance of 397.44 feet along a curve not tangent
to the last described line, said curve being concave to the
northwest, having a radius of 437.06 feet, a central angle of 52
degrees 06 minutes 06 second and the chord of said curve bears
South 28 degrees 29 minutes 14 seconds west; thence South 54
degrees 32 minutes 17 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 64.42 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential
curve, concave to the northwest, having a radius of 256.04 feet and
a central angle of 51 degrees 50 minutes 48 seconds, a distance of
231.69 feet; thence westerly along a reverse c~rve, concave to the
south, having a radius 'of 466.02 f,eet, a central angle of 16
degrees 58 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 138.04 feet; thence
South 89 degrees 24 minutes 48 seconds West, tangent to said curve,
a distance of 16.38 feet to the east line of the west 66.00 feet of
said Southwest Quarter, as measured at right angles to the west
line thereof, and said line there terminating.
Subject to the ,ight-of-way of County State Aid Highway No. 78 per ANOKA COUNTY
HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY NO. 23, according co che reco,ded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Subject to other valid easements, if any.
-v
i
If
I; · I
,I ; :;
: ~ -1
:! \. l
.j( GROV'E,
BIRDS
.
.
.
.
:; . I
a Z :; I
i :; g :;
i :I i -
~ ! ~ !
.
.
"
.
.
.
"
-
r
.
.
:;
.
~
.
.
.
.
.
:;
Ii
,
.
::
.
.
"
-
.
. "
:; .. .
= :
; 0 ..
! ~ i
~ ~ I
..: .. =:;
- .
. . 1I
~ =t i
. .. ~
ANC~A co.
.
.
.
.
"
.
~
~
.
.
.
:;
.
.
a
..
.
~
" .
. .
w !
. %
;1 .
o i
.
%
"
.
.
~
~
o
!
i
i
~
!
~
.1
1--
I '
'~
I
, I
'\.---" I
\.i-.J
,
v
.
.
:;
.
.
.
.
"
.
.
.
; .
.
:: :;
~.u j
:
.
.
.
.
:;
~ .
i ;
; ~
j J
~
.
.
.
=
.
.
:;
:;
.
.
! I
"
~ -
~ ~
.
%
:;
~
:
i:I
i
"
. 0
.
~ :
. ,
. ~
u .
if
1 I
I'
;1:
Ii
"
I,
"
':
'I
'- )
')
'--)
,.~)
I?>
III ~\
. '. _::
;~--~ !
J!~; 'I
I I '
I r---J I
I ,I...j' -u I~ ~
CO )'>:~ ~
, :J:I .. v-
i \ ~:
I ,11f
i
J
\ I
i:~
j:\
III
g~
.g~
.c;lO
~ j'3N
;
~ . f .
." -r-
, _ ..-4-
: i J>
..z
" ,(f)
~ 10
:: \z:
':J I
~ IOJ
:>> 10
oC
011
, 1 fT1
:;:-:\<
:j)>
" ,;0
::0 10
61
I 1
~I
-ol
r-
J~ ....
-II
I
~I
NI
VJ I \, :
s e9i~~~~'
: I
~ -0
. )>
ll- :;u
."~ n
~6fT1
i:: r
n-
a
o
!
s e9'2'26.[
330,00
.
b
:8
~
.'
"
I
I
~IO.DO
)>
,
:
!
r
'.
. .
\
,
,
,
~
'I'",
; , "U rP'
- ' . ~ )>
, 1 ,r c - ;0
. :; n r
, ~:rT1
1 Ar
j I ~
0- if
.
~ 0
.
~~-
0-
:::
~
J
ci~
0,
~~
:i
s e~' 2'26.[
405,00
, PARCEL C '
PJ.~l C 10.. ,"'11(1.
.;~ K ~c'"' Pl.'::!
S t"" u-&: ~ 1. TOll
v
: "U
v )>
G- :;u
::~ n
H~
o-
j OJ
..~ ....t~ DiU
4 ,.. tlUlh',.'tfI)tt!C_U:'"
'}_::'~'__ - ''';i:;~''t
.~.:.
.-
.'
.:'__":f-.
"i'(1'"V
6:19.4"'- "
,86"1)9'19"\'1 .
1111'''' ~1CM--.'"
..
'.
.
;
!
~
i
~
"
r :i'QJ~-"~"'---"">- \
.v -~
-' ) i,'
\.--,.1.. )
-~:..."~~.......:...,.
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
,"
~SPECIAL USE PERMIT
17.]<1;,
Property Address ~~d~~ ~\uA.
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot Block
Addi tion
(If metes and bounds, attach the
complete legal description.)
Is the property: Abstract){ or Torrens ? (This
information must be provided and can be obtained from the County.)
PIN Oa~~"'3:l00o~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Request .:JO ~,.~~ 40'X..~()~. p~~ b'i/~ t'">AJ
Lb.u~..I+ JCI^-.J~ d..~ ~ HCI,.)VtAJ bJLJA. A 'pt)rJ~~ ._.jll
-, b~ QLJ: \+ <....J,.....'-' .'AJ .3 0 ~~,..~ .
'--)
Section of Ordinance 4.os.J ~cJcurrent zoning
11-/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant _O\~\<. ~Lln.
Address \dI41. /40Tff l-10 N W
Home Phone is'-lD~q1. Business Phone
Signature --::V..l~.k ~~~J
1so-cnao
Da te a-~O - q3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
--fome Phone
'-)
Signature
Business Phone
Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------
~
,
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
)
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the pr9perty and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
w~thin 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Application Fees:
Commercial
Residential
Amended SUP
Recording Fee
$190.00 $.
~> (7o-co
$~O . 00..)
Date Paid ~lC! Z", \'\'tjteceipt * .!J14 ~ t..
\
Rev. 5-06-93:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
I
'~I
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
\
\. )
-,
DI- n" n;- D" 1> .=. D" D D'" D I-n" DI- "'" DI- :3:" DI- ;.=.o ."
Z'-I 0.... ITI'-I e:- ZI- Z- ZI- e:- Z '-10- Z'-I :::0- Z'-I 0.... Z'-I '''':0....
OfJl ~Z OfJl OZ O~ OZ o "J oZ 0 '-IxZ 0'-1 DZ 0'-1 OZ 0'1 -:TI Z
00 ~ .. DO- ITI .. /'\ (.n ITI .. 0..0 ITl .. 0 "J O~ 0.. O~ z.. "'~ -" ..
<:0 I :::o~ -I D "J :::0 <:0 -I <: fJlUl <: fJl I <:~ m D~ lT1
m ITIO ~ CI UlO ITl -I .:;. ITI me- ITl mf~ ITl ~o ~C'
:::O:E I\) :3::E ml\) :3::E 01\) :::O:E ITlI\) :::0 J: D "J :::OJ: -< "J :::om I\) :3:~ ' "J
D I 'A ZD (.~ ZD Z'A D fA D Z r~~ D (,~ I -11.1'1 ZITl I> (,.,
\ ) :3::::0 ~I\) :::0 -II\) :::0 "J :3::::0 II\) :3: Z "J :3:Z :3: "J :3:e: J: ~,J , I -':Z "J
ZO II\) fJlO I\) fJlO :E "J ZO DI\) Z Ul:3:1\) ZUl ....1\) zm o "J U11 ""'-I "J
~ m~ fJI I~ fJI ....~ :E~ 0 ~ 0 n~ m :3:~ tJlO _ J: .:>
tJll (..I (..II 1...1 (,~ I 1(..1 f.JII :::0(..1 fJI Z~I\) f.JIZ J:I\) f.JI- D "J (..I:E 0";
,'JI ^ -I~ OA :~ .... O^ I "J f.JI;O:: ITlI- fJI (,~ fJI D ':,.j fJI:::O UlW 0 Z.:>
I~-.I c. ~ 0 ~, -0 W Zo (..I m :::0 .:;. I~" r:tI ITl .::. IA 0 0 ~" -<c-
OO !~ .=. 0 c..O 0 D .:;. 00 n .:;. C' 10 C' 00 10 0 OC' .... c
~:::o 0 :::0 0 :::0 :3:0 ':>:::0 ITI .:;. ~ <: m C' ~ C' ~Z 0 Z 'lT1 e-
ll\) ;O::~ (.~ I\) OITl..o Z Ull\) :E ~O"- ITI 0-
Z ~ Z Z :::0 Z :::0 :::0 , 2-
:E Z :E :E :E Z-I ~ Z Z
Z ~ ,I> I> :E m
m 0 z 0
c.. :3: I n Z
e: - ~ Z
Z <: -
ITI - m ITl
I>
- c..
--
.-.-
-------.-
m ;0::" Ul Z" I> Ul" D I-I>'" I> I- 0." DI- Ul." DI- ;0::." DI- N."
I e:- -I .:,.j 1Tl_ ZI- D- Z IA e:.... Z'-I :::0- Z'-I ....- Z'-I - - Z'-I ... -
DCO -Z fJl IZ 00- mz 0 o-OZ 0'-1 :::OZ 0'-1 :3:Z 0'-1 ZZ 0'-1 ZZ
t-oI .=. ^ .. I (,~ Ul .. 0.:> D .. 0 .:>1Tl" o (..j A'" 0.. A..... en .. O~ Z..
Zr:.n ITI 00- 0 <: .~ <: -I <:.:> ^ D':> Z D~ <:r:.n ITI
ITI Z -=. e: z e- ITl :::0 C. ITl ,-10 ITl ITI .::. Ul C' :3: C. ITI n C,
..... "J "'-1 I\) :::01- cr (,.J :::0 D ITl ~,J :::OJ: Z (,~ :3: III o ~,J :3:-< - t'.J :::0 III ^ ~J
:3::E c... (A Ulm c.. IA '-I 0(,., :::0 'A D Z ,>, zr Z ,>, ZITI n"~,, I rn (,.-.6
Z~ D ~.J x D ~.J :3:'-1 Z "J :3: 011\) :3:Z ITl t-,J C ~.J I J: ~,J :3:e: :::0 t'J'
:3: ~,J "D :3: ~,J Z~ ITl t'-J Z DI\) ZUl -I t,J f.JIlTl "ll t,J fJl I D ~.J ZITl ~-J
r:.nl- ITI.:> DZ 1Tl~ -<.:> IE':> 0 J:.:> r:.n1Il ::J~ 'JI 0 ITI.:> III c...:>
'JI .::. Ul (.-, :::0 (J] (A 'JI .:> 'JI A AI (.,~ 'JlZ I- (.~ ..... I'T1 t'J :~~ :E I ~J fJl_ ITI ~,J
.:> (-,j ACll I- fJl D "1- Ul ITl "J 'JI I':> - - 0(," .:> Ul:::O "ll.:>
'_' ""J.
) (..j Z . , o .::. (.., <: . . c..~ OZ.::. '>~ r:!:' ':>0 ITl C. .:>" 00 (.... '=' "ll C,
.:>m . . :3: . , .::.m :~ C. :::0 n .::. 01 ~~ C. ;0 .=. - . . :::00
'-~ Z :~. .=. .:> . . .:> ITl .::. .:><: Z ...... .=. Z :~ .=. ':>Ul ITI C,
I- Ul Z c..iii Z ..0 0 -0- E nUl ITI '-I -I -< ~-J
Ul I E D , ,,. :::0 ^ :3:
'JI -< n ITl Z ::> Z D
.:> Z ^ 3: Z :~ , :::0 ITI
~J Z .... ITl - ~
0- m ;::t (/1 D
Ul n e: I
D Ul ~ 0
D :::0
Z ....
0
n I- GJ " C :::0 ::c " D I- :;: " ::> I- m ." nl- D " I> :3: " ::> .....il " D I-::C"
m '-I e: - m -I ITl - Z '-I ::> .... Z .:> 3: .... m '-I c - Z I- .... - Z '-II - Z 1-0 ....
C .:> Ul Z ITI :;u Z 0 'JI c.. Z 0 I- 3:Z C 0- 0 Z 0 'J' I Z 0 '-ID Z C fJl IZ
D -I .. :::0 t'.J 0 .. 0 OJ ITl .. 0 t,J I> .. I> m .. 0 l- I .. 0 I-:D .. 0 ..0 D ..
;;:;) .:> D :E D <: t',J :;u <: z - -I <: ..0 ITI <: Ul -I <: Ul
JJ -
'TI 0 '" ITl I ' , m E Ul . . -I I'T1 :::0 m :D ITI I> ITI t--]
- E (J) t'J 0 0 GJ (.~ :::0 J: ITl (..j :::0 I> t.,J :3: E ITl t--J :::0 E ~-J "'.' ID ~-J ~ Z A (..~
..:.. "'.'
Z :D 0 (." c x ITl (." D 'A :::0 , 'A Z D (", .... " ,>j I C (-" 0 (.-.;
~
:::0 Z ~.J 0 t'-J :3: Z ID ~.J :3: 0 m t'.J " c.. t'.J :3: - D t--J :;: em t-,J :3: 0 , t..;
.,.~.
'JI C t-,J :;: t',J :;u ~,J Z Ul ~,J Z zt.J 'JI 0 0 t,.J z 0 C ~'.J Z m Z t--J Z <:.... t'-J
'-' ^ .:> Z r:.n GJ .:> 0 :~ .:> I 0 .:> '." ::c .:> r .:> '" Z .:> I'T1 Z .:>
(.,~ I D .:,.j . . ITl .:> '-" Z .:> Ul ^ ITl I~', (-" I Z (", Ul I t.,J '.J1 -- ~,J Ul :;u Ul (.,~
^ -I .:> fJl .:> 'J' :;: I- 'JI r t..] , . A I- '.-I' D (J) (., fJl :::Oul .:> fJl I .:>
.:> J: 0- :~ (.., ID D (.., 0 r . . .:> GJ (.., ^ (.'j c ,>, '" 0
c m .:> ' . I c.. . , :::0 C m :~ - :~ ' , I:E -
- :::0 ' . .:> n .:> <: m ' , .:> 0 '-' ..... :~ .:> ;- .:> (J) .:> <: 0-
"'J
- I- .:> r l- e :;u 0- Z CD (.., 0 ?\ ~3: ,>, 0 - (..~
-
Z Z D r , :~ Z c.. :::0 D ::>
, :E m :::0 Z m , 0 -I Z:::O Z
.. ) - :E (J) D Z E n :E
'---' ITI Z ?\ I> Z :::: r m
m - z m z
.....
I> m I'T1 m
.... z
c.. "','
....
~
~
~
'1l
..
i
'-'
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, September 14, 1993 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use
Permit request of Dirk Fenna to construct an accessory structure
(40' x 60' pole building) prior to the construction of a principal
structure as established in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05,
Accessory Buildings on the property located at 17395 Hanson
Boulevard NW (generally located south of Ward Lake Drive).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
~ A copy of the application and location will be available at
~J Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
lLz.~ ~
Victorl,a Vo ,Cl ty Clerk
Publication dates: September 3, 1993
September io, 1993
I
,
.~/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5. 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
NO
Rezoning - Crown pointe
and Other - R-1 to R-4
Ashford Development Corp.
Planning
12
BY:
..3.
David L. Carlberg
city Planner
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of
Ashford development Corporation, Inc. to rezone from R-1, Single
Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban the property legally
described on the attached resolution.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
,~ )
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for
changing zoning district boundaries.
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 (B) establishes the criteria for
granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall be used
for rezoning requests as well.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their September 14, 1993
meeting, made the motion to recommend to the City Council
approval of the rezoning. The Council should consult the
September 14, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes
included in the packet materials for details on the public
hearing. Please note the lengthy discussion and concern by the
area residents in regard to the environmental issues.
Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval.
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
\- )
TO:
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REZONING REQUEST OF ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, INC. TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 25 AND
26, LEGALLY DESCRIBED BELOW FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO R-4,
SINGLE FAMILY URBAN.
WHEREAS, Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. has
requested a rezoning from R-1, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single
Family Urban on the property legally described on the attached
Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B) and that there is no substantial
negative effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands;
there will be no negative effects on the values of property and
scenic view in the surrounding area; and
\
~}
WHEREAS, the Planring and zoning Commission finds that the
request is in compliance with Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was much
sincere well spoken and well documented opposition to said
rezoning especially in regard to management of the wetlands; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends the
City Council approval of the rezoning request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission and hereby approves the rezoning of
the property legally described on Exhibit A from R-1, Single
Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 5th day
of October, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey. Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Yolk, Clty Clerk
,
, )
,
I
~~-~
1
,_I
~
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 32,
Range 24, lying Easterly of the Great Northern Railway Company
right-of-way, Anoka County, Minnesota
AND
That part of the south 689.24 feet as measured along the west line
thereof, of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32,
Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the
centerline of Prairie Road as now laid out and traveled.
Except that part described as follows:
That part of the south 340.00 feet, as measured at right angles,
of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 855.56 feet,
thereof, as measured at right angles, and lying westerly of the
centerline of prairie Road as now laid out and traveled.
~)
,
, )
~)
Page 7
A public hearing was held. There was some opposition to the plat,
largely regarding the ecological aspects of it.
Discussion:
to the city
is provided
Commission.
Todd Haas noted that the Water Resources plan is new
and we have to make sure that all of the information
prior to the time th~ plat comes to the Planning
Vote on Motion: 5 yes (Dehn, Peek, Squires, Putnam, Apel), 1 no
(Jovanovich) vote. Motion carried.
Commissioner Jovanovich stated that she voted no as she would like
to see further ecological studies done on the property.
Recess 10:20 - Reconvene 10:25.
Public Hearing/Rezoning/Ashford Development Corporation
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the rezoning request from R-1 to R-4, noting
that a portion of the property is Crown Pointe. The property will
be served by sanitary sewer and water. The Comprehensive plan
shows this property to be in the 1990-1995 time period. If the
Metropolitan Council denies our request to include this property
in the Metropolitan Servige Area, then the property will have to
be developed into 2.5 acre lots. An Environmental Assessment
Worksheet is required on developments exceeding 250 unattached
units; therefore, this plat would not require an EAW. The city
has not required discretionary EAWs.
At this time, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
Jerr Windschitl, Ashford Develo ment Cor oration stated that the
reasons or t e rezon1ng request are t at 1t 1S 1n conformance
with the comprehensive Plan, it is consistent with the sewer plan
and the property is bordered by R-4 zoning with sewer and water.
Richard Fuller, 13948 prairie Road addressed staff's comments
about EAWs. It's a great way to see to it that bodies like this
never take a global view that you never study all of the
environmental impacts that any given project might have. Mr.
Fuller indicated that an EAW will never have to be done if the
city continues to rezone and plat properties that are no more than
160 units at a time. He stated that this is a fine example of
what is wrong with our planning; we allow it to be taken out a
piece at a time and we never get around to looking at what the
overall impact is going to be.
Mark Menth, 14122 prairie Road stated that his first home in
Andover was on Hanson and Andover Boulevards. At that time
he was told it would be 8 to 10 years before development and they
put in Old Colony Estates. When he purchased his present home he
was told it would be 8 to 10 years before development or rezoning
would take place. It is a year later and they are talking about
rezoning. He felt that the city should re-evaluate the
Comprehensive Plan as we are deteriorating the community by
putting these developments in. He felt that the city should
listen to the people who have lived here for a long time and not
the people who are moving into areas like Old Colony because they
can purchase cheap lots. Mr. Menth stated that he is opposed to
the rezoning.
,~ )
,-
,J
'\
,,-)
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 8
(Rezoning, Cont.)
Dave carlberg took exception to the comments that the city doesn't
plan. At the time Mr. Menth called him, 8-10 years before
development was the truth. TKDA prepared a study for the city
showing the properties that the Metropolitan Waste control
Commission said can be served by sanitary sewer and the number of
gallons per day we can generate and the we can cover. Mr.
Carlberg took offense to the people saying that we don't plan, as
that is his job and he feels we do a good job of it.
Chairperson Dehn noted that the city has progressively tried to
plan for population changes and it's very difficult for Dave to do
his job to everyone's satisfaction. She also noted that the
Commission is only an advisory board and the city Council makes
the final decision. Those people here tonight are welcome to
attend the City Council meeting to voice their opposition.
Lynn Chaffee, 614 Andover Boulevard felt that the city is looking
out more for people who are moving into Andover than those people
who already live here. She was opposed to the fact that the parks
are not improved so that the hundreds of children moving here have
a place to play.
Tom Chouinard, 14123 Prairie Road doesn't mind development as long
as it's two and a half acre lots. He moved out here for the peace
and quiet. He felt that everyone on the Commission, except for
maybe Bev Jovanovich, is for development. He would like to see
the EAW done and asked why the Planning Commission is afraid to
rquest it. Mr. Chouinard further stated that they all have horses
and farms and questioned where they are going to take their horses
once this property is developed. The City is going to force them
out because they won't be able to pay the assessments when sewer
and water come in.
Jerry windschitl noted that the parcel above his has requested
sewer and water also and there is nothing he is doing to force
sewer and water assessments on Mr. Chouinard or anyone else in the
area.
Carol Hofstad, 684 Andover Boulevard stated that her main concern
is the d~tches and where the water will end up.
Ed Gritton, 14157 prairie Road explained that he has horses and is
concerned w~th the l~ab~lity if children from the new d~velopments
get onto his property and get injured by one of his horses. He
asked who the Planning Commission represents.
Commissioner Apel noted that as a member of the Planning
Commission all he can look at is if the applicant meets the
ordinances. He stated that he worked on the Comprehensive plan
and if he were to go back on this now, he would not be true to
himself.
Pat Schroeder, 720 Andover Boulevard asked if by allowing this to
be rezoned now, w~ll the wetland legislation going into effect in
January apply. Mr. Carlberg noted that the wetland legislation
applies to plats, not rezonings. Ms. Schroeder asked that the
Planning Commission deny the rezoning.
1'-)
\
l'-)
~-)
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 9
Dave Grorud, 14545 palm Street N.W. asked why the Planning
Commiss~on feels compelled to make a decision on this now without
a preliminary plat. He felt that the railroad tracks would be a
natural barrier between the R-l and R-4 districts. He also
recommended that the rezoning be denied.
Dave Erickson, 745 - 140th Lane N.W.-opposed to the rezoning.
MOTION by Squires, seconded by Apel to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
to keep
The city is
Commissioner Squires stated that it would be nice
things the way they are but it is not reasonable.
doing its best to grow in an orderly fashion.
Commissioner Putnam noted that if we didn't care, we would not be
here.
Commissioner Jovanovich said that she would vote to keep this
property R-1.
Commissioner Peek stated that the driving force behind the
Comprehensive Plan was not development only. The purpose of the
Comprehensive Plan was to manage the growth in the most reasonable
way possible.
Chairperson Dehn noted that she will abstain from voting. She
feels that the city should be planned in an organized manner.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Peek that the Andover Planning and
zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the
rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to
rezone property located in Sections 25 and 26 from R-1, single
family rural to R-4, single family urban. Whereas the
Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has
determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.
8, Section 5.03(B) and that there is no substantial negative
effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands; there will
be no negative effects on the values of property and scenic views
in the surrounding area. The Planning and zoning Commission finds
that the request is in compliance with Ordinance No.8, Section
5.02. A public hearing was held and there was much sincere well
spoken and well documented opposition to said rezoning especially
in regard to management of the wetlands.
It would be advised, however, for the City Council and Planning
and Zoning Commission to review their previous policies and
perhaps in light of the new legislation in the past year 1992,
i.e., Tree Ordinance and water control legislation, to take a
harder look at what we're doing in our planning and rezoning.
Motion carried on a 4 yes (Peek, Putnam, Apel, Squires), 1 no
(Jovanovich), 1 abstain (Dehn) vote.
This will go to the City Council on october 5, 1993.
, '\
,~)
September 10, 1993
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board
Centennial Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Board:
Enclosed for filing please find a citizen's petition requesting an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet in connection with action proposed by the Ashford Development Company to
the City of Andover.- Copies have been mailed to the Ashford Development Co., the City
of Andover, and the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District.
': Sincerely,
,_/
~.
Richard . Fuller
Mansfield & Tanick
1560 International Center
900 Second Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3383
(612) 339-4295
cc: Ashford Development Co.
Andover City Clerk
Anoka County Soil & Water Conservation District
'-)
- \
'--)
'\
....__1
:_)
."'. ... -
,
.
i.:
P.EuuON FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Pursuant to MINN. STAT. ~ 116D.04, and Minnesota Rules ~ 4410.100, the undersigned
hereby petition the Environmental Quality Board of the State of Minnesota, the City of
Andover, and the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District, to require the
Ashford Development Company to prepare a an Environmental Assessment Worksheet with
regard to the following project.
A. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will review the
rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc., to rezone property
located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25 and the
Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
from R-l, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban for the purpose of
subdividing the property and constructing single family homes.
The property is generally located south of Andover Boulevard and east of the
Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, and west of Prairie Road.
B.
PROPOSER OF THE PROJECT
C.
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
3640 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
Tel: (612) 427-9217
REPRESENTATIVE OF PETITIONERS
D.
Paul and Linda Mazzei
935 Andover Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Tel: (612) 'I?>'1-0i"/
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROJECT
.-
....
The proposed project will result in high density urban development of a currently
rural area, a significant portion of which occupies the formally designated flood plain
of the Coon Creek Watershed in Anoka County. Such high density development will
alter current drainage patterns in the watershed and flood plain. Rainwater runoff
can be expected to adversely effect water quality in Coon Creek and the Mississippi
River. The area proposed to be developed is located in the vicinity of Bunker Prairie
Park, which contains the state's largest remaining stand of virgin buffalo grass prairie
(an endangered plant life species) and associated wildlife. Increased traffic from high
density urban development can be expected to increase air pollution, dust, and noise,
adversely affecting wildlife in the immediate area as well_ as increasing traffic
"
'.'
- \
'_j congestion and endangering pedestrian traffic in more removed areas and contribut-
. ing to local air pollution.
In witness whereof the following residents have hereunto set their signatures below.
~1/7J' ..
, ~~--
Paul Mazzei
935 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dated:
~(
( ~ ~
. da Mazz~ ~
~ -3/-9.3
935 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
\,
----I
13948 Prairie Rd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dated: 'i) "ll \ " ""b
pen~l~
13948 Prairie Rd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dated: 7lb/9J
o::::JL1Ad t! d n / ///1../ ~-:9.
-M. Vi~orj,a Fuller -L H2. _ r ';3
A. 1f"4~ U~
Dated, q-~-~
9~ UJAflWfY'-'
::Ju. A/ E 19 D .41'$0 ;J
j
Dat d:
12900 Harper St. NE
Blaine, MN
q131 Uv\6tS.fert..^
;\A.f;.-pk.- ~ rt) V<,MIIj S-55~ 7
/'
- ,
, )
-~
3'bO lyH"'- LQ....c:. I-Jt...::>
A",Aovcr MIV 5S 30'1
JOc:/' C/hff?,
7'7;-' (?7']J!;. ,AI/f A/.w-
,4 ;1~ve..r- ~ n, 7530,/
. .'. I
',j
Dated: ~-51-~
~. p~~
5E/-lN r: PJ/9ZZC/
~d:~.Luv Jj 1'1'13
if&[~Rr. Jkcfv-/
Dated:~3j ICfG
,1)OA;,j{ (! ~
'7>ctVic; C2, oyud
,
)
~/
D4t~ ~ 199-:;>
. ~ ~~4J
'J)/c;;'e- /JJ. VI-err Z-fd'
Dated: i 1! .J
-
Dated:
~B ~S Rqd~
4mAtlM J. , lqltrV
~~
"_1-)_)~ ~SO/be:!J
Dated: f I ~ ".(I
<)Ian ~t1 J'.I&J
9-4-9-
~ Jar::J(j~
,-J
,
7~O N-W~ ~-G1BI<.)J.
@/vL~-<A. /Vt;v'
I
715'15 jJ~ p. y),0,
/Jydcrv-e/v
/4/sf./S,~,A/~
~
/'15~O {g,t-oNI 5r N. /)/ -
/tvl/DOlliC..e/ ptrl/, >~301
Il{S-L.jO fflLf11 5f. (lfW
/huoover; mN. '-S-3tJf
J4b5S Pal~ st
Jh0 c:J V ~ VY\A 53> 3uj
/4rSS- -PQlm $r-tid- ;JuJ
4rdOVUj m ttJ_
)
,
,_J
\
J
"-- /
" '
.
/'175"5" II/Vn ~ AlU/
II;VIJove((.( 11v1/. ~9o'f
~ i'Yl9J ~=--- 'it. N0
~do-v-c 'f 0Af0 ~<-;,-:3 ol.J
~~
~~ c:? f.j;i:~dlj - )tJ- J? / '5 P tUm 0U.).) It) ,
\...oi~ ~~\c..h tl nc/ p-z;..erJ ffllJ ..::J~
Dated:
'1- '-\-q,>
Dated:
q-1- 93 . f'tu:;t 1i'~,b
Che I Ifichards
Dated:
930 J'-f 8i.h ;V u.J
~ Jnr,. ..5530,/
/
~ /'I~f-I.., La,....H. tJ,~_
q,- 4 ~ q 3 ;(;r& .w-d ~~j~ lJO- """IV, ~f"'3o /
Lyle. LI./IJ 4"'f;Sr n ~
Dated:
9%-/ff7'A h/J~;j/W
/!/Jdon:.r Jll;1/ 00c.?tJ'y
)
.' .
"-... . ..'.{
.. <I." "
,
,--)
1t/7ot 5{ca.Mofe. 5+' AJ,l,0 .
/Lf~;t) ~
:_)
tee}; Sl:']7T -r
~.. ~O /Lf?-;-J, L/-f.;v.w,
. "b-:"
Dated~ii7~ )~~
jwf~ SVi"/JA/uove,e /:'kvz::,_A/.W. .
'7t . ~u ~-mL/
Dated: 7'/Yr 1"3'
~ a~ bi'f JlNObVt/L&U/J AlJ
y~CM-U ,
~;: ~ ~ d &N d~~;JyJ)
~ )
,,-------/
, ')
'-~
,
, i
----
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNfY OF HENNEPIN
)
)ss.
)
Richard Fuller, of the City of Andover, County of Anoka, in the State of Minnesota,
being duly sworn, says that on the 10th day of September, 1993, he served the annexed
Petition for Environmental Assessment Worksheet on Ashford Development Co., City of
Andover, and Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District by mailing to them copies
thereof, inclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing same in the post office
at Minneapolis, Minnesota, addressed as follows:
City Clerk
Andover City Hall
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andov~r, MN 55304
Anoka County Soil & Water Conservation District
11931 Central Ave. NE
Blaine, MN 55434
Ashford Development
3640 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
PJ6f!d:;{A
Subscribed and sworn to pefore me
this /""....~ 1993,
I~UbliC
r~ MARCIA L MILLER
~.!! . NOTARY PUBLlC- MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My CommIssion Exp, Aug, 2, 1994
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September L~; 1~93
AGENDA ITEM
6. Public Hearing -
Rezoning - R-1 to
R-4 - Crown pointe
and Other
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg ~
City planner --t:2..-
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone
property from R-1, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family
Urban. The property is generally located south of Andover
Boulevard NW, east of the Burlington Northern Railroad and west of
prairie Road. The property is located in Sections 25 and 26.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for
changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning).
) Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for
granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall also be
considered in the determination of granting a rezoning request.
The criteria include:
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and land,
the effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area, and
the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
If the Commission chooses to deny the rezoning request, it is
imperative that the Commission indicate findings of fact in this
and all rezoning cases.
'- )
, )
'-'
Page Two
Rezoning - Crown pointe and other
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
September 14, 1993
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the rezoning requested by Ashford Development
Corporation, Inc. to rezone property from R-1, Single Family
Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban, legally described on the
attached resolution.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(B).
B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the rezoning requested by Ashford Development
Corporation, Inc. to rezone property from R-1, Single Family
Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban, legally described on the
attached resolution.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal does not meet
the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(B).
C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
/ ')
'_I
~)
--~ ~ '!!-~ ~ lJ ~ :,,:~ ~'i:'/X~ :
I ~I :::r o,J: EN~""; I'
I I " " ':'/,
I '- ..;- ~ ':t{)J<. ',:: '
~...~~--'1IR:-I--1 r- -1' "'~A'~"" T - 'II ~'.~r~~*_~''''; ,.,,': ')" ;
"~'-. ,.~"' ~, \! I C
~.. I , I,:v, /D~"S . ':t r ...:""} ~/ I
: ~I "Iii \~ ^ J... 8" I
'''''~RT~ : . \ ~ I ((\ )k;: Y' "< l '-..1--J'lJJ
I 1 : I ' " : ~ I' ~ ......."
"""_.. Tf----~ ------ "'--rtl __-'-~ "T ( :
:~ r,.T':;}~', ~r'\" \"~- . ~- I I
i' ~ ~ ' tL, J v< "~'< ( I -< -... i
, ,,, p. ,~i ~"" :- ::;,n.. ....) I""" I
.=:.. ,7; ~ ~., ,~,., ~~ U'~I .
~ :, '~..m ~~ 'n ,If. t ""', ""<. -~ \ .'<", ?~ '
I ...';=..'. :'i: ",'" \ \ .j;;' r! c-- '
/,' ;r,I", "/':'11' /. /- >' I"'" , ' ~
, ", ,', I ,,' !:>-..",;' /, "\' !. . <.....,. 2 . I ., \ , . U'
~ <<:::--- : "..,. ''4,..x(AK'Z / ' , ' ......, -
f;Nl : : : ,.;,. ,'- : ',: :"'::-\.F :-:. ' I ~ ~ARNit:;i Ro~hM~'- ,\ i .' · :
: ~I' "~~ ./'!fJ{Y , I ~ rl:~' , . r J -.:1 ......- ~ I ~ -=- f- ~II
VcR<;; :eN ' ,""'"'''''''' ,~4 ~.~ r r. 1:~": IW~~fl? ! 1'- -_' . ~ -'-II
b;A >-..' R 41 l~;"~~;/:;: I --1 ~'_. ~~I ~~~;~ ~-- I . i ,~.L I 'I',: I I I ,-- -~II
~ . I ~: I ~ ,!:"r~~... - , ':, ' i.f ~v.: :> . - , - ' BA/?Nis I ROLL~NG' -(' 1-
~i( . J' , -. :; I:f ' ,,.... I, ,I' ~ , [' OAKS" !: '<,
i.Z l' R ,~ : Fl: ' I ' ;1 T ~ ., I" :'" I . I' . I' I, i I
~~,,,~~II: ~:: :~I" ",-'- ': I_~~'I I, i I I III
~,'il~.\ U~ i ~'~D~' li,~_, '" --: 'I ,i '" I.!. .
~'-~ ~~ f ,,_ ~., ~r~, ., AU!~OR" -
, "'":""" ' 1 ~ -- ~ ~!ii : L- 1 J I \-
'I : 1 ~i . \ "" .. S---'-4- .s ' ·
___ \:....... , j ,,~. __ ___ I ~~ ""","' /'i'_ ......~ _ _ ...- 9uaol~'-
't;"~ Tf- \'iii;,.-f-~-""'" --~-----'--'-~- '--;-'
R-I! ~("~t.l.-_~ . II ~~' ~~-- ';" -",.' - \
I r"'~~' .:.~ 'I' \ "'-. . '-- (t;- 141
I ' j "ll 1--~.~ I I ~ .... "'-. ",--Ir1 "I!.~ l ,;t.f:i . 1 I
I I l""l .... -'- _' I, , '-........ ....... '-'Itl "loT ~ ):;~.; :
~..... ,,' t.. 'lI ~. '" I ........... ..L1- . '" '""'" -~
; ~ --..~ ,: ~ ~ ~
;; I.L ~,IJ__' :.- ,,_ I/~ ' V
Len. &~ '.~~'i"I~ ' II
GB ! r:~~~~:'~ ~?i:'~:;:: R 4 L '
i " ';;1)",."" o. " -Ii ~~ -
------- ----- ~ " ;;:.... .. : .~~.. ';I~ro.;. ,
: '-.H.'~~W_H.~~} "~-------
,:/: : , ;--0 S:.;.; .: ".". ,.,.-:: :. ;" :' ' i~
.... I ~~..:: ",,~,1. ,tl....... .," . u : -<
- ,:/,/2''3:'"-.{'''' ,...,~,~\ '.:;;; " ~ :- I
i .,'-JfO~ 2." y' . . " .' :;:"..0' " ..... ~ ~ ~- - - - :
I T~' "'''.'';7p,.'w::", ";Do'r~\ -"/ /-----\ ,~ '
,r ..,.... NB ~, ....'... ,,<1:;':."". J I -.l I )
III' f.,-- ~';""",_" : ',..'.',.'. ;.F':, ,.!' '1'- -:-I ~VNKE:fjRI -- c._~ll[..+-_-1_~.,..--;1I
',',. ...'. "_o".. .'.. . -, ! _ ,\', _\ ~" LAKE' I ,......(' I ~
. . j' " .. i' II' \,~" ~~~'~ '-, _ ~_ '- - i -l ~. :' \.
r WA_ T's. I J" I ---', '~-.>::_--.\ '* II "" I i
r ___+___:....:-,___ :.....! ___"\ -~ J'i\~ \.\'" -<.)' ",'r
:",- ,~ R;, -0 EN. I I ' I r r7 ~ ..~C- "-r '\\ I ""...._J. -
. : I ! , ~ I~_-" -(", \- (~
'AC ES' -:-,' I i I, j. ~f3UNKE~HIC~~/'PA~ : ~r
J~~~~ "j "I 1,1 IJ ~ '.' ..~ : ~\. -1. -J, (., I
-------. ~ ..-------:::-
~,~
----l--~
I I
~ '\ I
-~I II
I
~
R-I
l~~~"t:.:t
I ii;;'~'1f.
I~ ';;~
.... :7'_
I """ <.
..,
-""
'\
IS
..
h d....~...
I cO
~)
~ 1~lt~ II~
Vir ,::}l=~
~1'" I I L:;
iiv.' ,/.;.. ' III
, !
I .
II I
~,Ii .\:
I ~ 'I \\.!
-i--~ 1----- ~
\ ~ / ~
h Ii "'-.'''- 1
f'K. \. . ......".f.l.:
I I ~ ',', I~ ~l(~
~ I'lAJ 5:-. W.. ,:
I I:t I
____ . "'f'- -"-- -..- - -- .
I;. . I ' h ~ .1{ '"
I '/ . I' , ,'- I
IU I I" .,. !
I rr [1';X;!1J : I
: ,; ~ 7f/J ~,,J- ~n_
I WIJ ~lj ..... - ==to
~T---'- r V~"~~:""(,/. I ....._1
1 " lit .'Xl/' J ~
I ,. .. '-'J II I. I
I... ___ 1.1:4
, ,I ' I I /I I
: I ,-, 7/ I
1---1 L___ L I
I I
I II
I ! ~Wj1:' ---
~ ----ll-S--~~'T.x1C,' ~_ ~:1
I ~ ~ I
__ ~L---' l._L-___:::.__~L
NO. 14
v
,I
~
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
~I'~
.: ZlMtM MI....
~ ;
d.. IUU oWL ifill
~ ~
i!; "'........_
~ ~
~ t
. I I I I 0'"''''''
-<
=
~1lf:<~ ~ ;.
~ /. ..n L--
Fr-'-
.:.~
__, I .
-____I ~ f-
1----
. 9A~1~s I RoL G'
,OAKS I
. :.....r.. /.
---11
l'
\
!, .UJ\OI~_~
: su ,\j..~
---:----k I~
,
,
"-.)
I
I
I
I
----+-----
I
I
!
"lM~1fIIl
_TIt.....
...."" ML M.
...."" av&. IN i
I
I
MtTlt ....... .j
....TIt...._ [
~
141'" Me. ""'
C
....."" awe._
.... .... .. .;
"
...... M4 ... -
"
.
....st -c. ...
-
.
.... .... ..
QltM -c._
OInt &VI._
-;:::
IJ1tM.......
QltM awe. ...
j
1
!
.All t~at part ,ot the Southeallt Quarter of Section 26, Township ;)2 /
Range 2filyirigEasterly,of the Great Northern Railway Company,r1gh1;
ot"WllY i'1Anoka::cOun1:Y'.I::,Hiil.llesota." h ._hO.._ _...,...' hU.............. -~:."......I
6 ; t _. . _.'~ _ .. _ . '..~ _: \ r
~f-'!II '!ff-'~. ~ I)) J _......
I -= - ~ ~ .,
'~)
1.
'-".
, '
. .
.
, .
\~)
~-.J
I
I
I,
~)
/~
.-
~ I'
...Q' ~,
, 'G.t
'1'.'
. '
'lJ9'
,
..
"
..
~
~~
.,~ ~'
.~... f\lA'",o
.~~ 'b'~~.'
,,-.? ,?T:l' V ..0, ,,,,~
f / '>4-
/ ',of/'
I
. "-
If'
:-;.. ~
I .........>;-~
,"....3:-...1
, .......-"".......
,'-z. '-
<""':"" I
~ 0'.......,
- ...........lb>.!
l- ..... z::: r---.....
~ . '1
I
I
I
I
Va'iS99
..M.."J1,6~.(JN
I
I 'l:
~ ~n
"a: ~....
t\. ~~
., 'It-:;
,'"
I
q;
..
..
::!
-J
!:
~
~
~
~
"
'"
o
"
'><
I
I
I
I
""
CO'UPi'
7.pg.EO.os
90'O'tlE
.,;
~
..
i
.~# .>>~.#. ~'-I.>-~
J_"'~"..r .I"'~_ JII"T .Ir~1tI
i
't
i::~
..:~
"'i
14).
<0:::
'"
.
" .
~~
l:\I ~
tl\;'
~:~
" .,
~~~
~~f
\,... l
~'"
~.~
k::'
t~;
~&~
.
.
H
~~
~~
h
~
. <'
\ "
.
.
,
i!
0 "
.
~
~
,
u
".
..
';
'"
i ~~'*~""
..., g,,". ....-...... 0l'G
;:~~...Ol i...~=:~=
.. , . ,;Ii.... '.....
I;': ~~1} ~~~~.,1':i
P.,"," ...... ,,!: ;J~~~~;._;
f'''''';::; ."..~,.1~3-
f~;l'~"'..' "'0""'.-
~ ... " .., "1 . if. 0 ."'.
~~-'i. : : ~ ~ ~.i..~~~
~.il:: a '3: r~ i: :': rea
!}',~~ u 01l1li 1: . ~ .,41'.
tt;t;.::.J .r._ g-s.!i,i..
r 1,....::1 'ii~:g.'a
t{.'!.....,.o ...4.
~"~ :_,0 ...... i... J ~'C a
ol~ .~:-:: ::l J"",,'~.
G,',.f:..... 0'" '0 . """"'llI_i
,. l' .... .~., "'1
;'=",h''''~::' '.-4 .~ ~:~~-=.
f,-,;"f,':&:S l~ :~:.~~
~.~t'" .., ~.. 14 = II
t:>''('...:' III i III ,;C: ~~'.'o
;'j:i": :a :J:.., lIl:II !;; ox._ :; .:
h':l'l",A",.. t. - w
J.',~'.'" = 0 'A i ~..ai;-'::a a
t~;" g 8 '" :.: ~ ::,~;lf::
;:r~. ~,~ gJ'='~~
0:,::3-.... '. .UQO'"
r! ,"~~.wo...;og :su...
I: i !-....1 .:: :.i"t~!:-
... t': -c: ~ ~ ',~ 1 "'~ . =- ~ '...
. .., . 1'" : - 0 "",.;-,
= J~i:~-oi ~:Jl ~~~.25C~;
Q j . .', ... '':,1.. 0'.
. :';tt.. - G~ iA : 0.:';. ..,:}'
t ~ ..: go::,: ~~ 3/".f'I.'~.&
:i i,A......:~; ;~:l ,;:'.~:~-:J
...J... _ "'~ I.. ....... tJII ......'1
IO,j. '1._"1: U', III bloC "",.'tII1
''"J': A.......; M. .Q a.............
;.". ... "." U i fW ] t. III ""..a...
.... ,." j ;~" .,.. eLt' f3
l;i~ \~ ~~~~t~ z
"
:_)
August 7, 1993
Mayor Jack McKelvey
Andover city Council
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Sir,
In our absence this letter represents our negative
response, as adjacent land owners, to the re-zoning of the
parcel described in the attached letter.
Described piece of property is and has been a flood plain.
In the past ten years this area has always been extremely wet,
and wet in drought years.
The section of land south of the 100 year flood plain is
much higher and may very well be one of the last remaining
un turned pieces of Glacial prairie in the state of Minnesota
and certainly in our City of Andover. It should be left
untouched and in its natural state.
, '1
,_I In addition to our ecological concerns we are hoping our
City government will take a long hard look at current development
in our city. Our growth in population and increased taxes are of
great concern to all and it may be time to slow down and take a
look at why most of the people moved to this city of rural
beauty and not to Egan or Plymouth where there are more people
and houses than wild life and trees.
Other concerns are, and should be, the safety of families
living on top of the major gas line that runs through the
proposed project.
We also have to look at additional traffic problems on our
already worn roadways, and if a bridge is built over Coon Creek
for additional access, upkeep costs of this bridge will be
the responsibility of the land owners, and not that of the
developer.
There are other points of concern that we have but at this
time we are hoping Andover will not make a hasty decision before
all concerns by surrounding residents have been taken into
consideration.
- '\
\....)
Sincerely,_ ~~~
Pau' Maz~f/~L. Linda M8'Ze~4. ~dl~
q:35 Andover;/
A I'1ckwe'( I M n
"
" )
'l"VJ'~S:"~'';;;:'''';"'~:'''~''
,j ',\
>I ,
'ff \
.fI. '...,
o.t ~:;
~. :.J
'\ .I.. ,j
~~~~":i~::i~6..? '
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
','
REZONING REQUEST FORM
property Address
Se~ 4TtM~ d /-c.-.... 41
d. -'
i2JCi-... /.,(~,.)
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot
Block
Addi tion
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete
legal description.)
Is the property: Abstract X or Torrens ? (This
information must be provide~ can be obtained from the County.)
PIN
-------------------------------------------------------~-------------
fO (l " '" h.. ~ /(')
/l...., ~ i-" J ,- ,J
/l..L 41,,-,coL' d~Jc- IN' J. L,...,.-/j
/;-vtloU 4. . bC'",,~ J'4'....7
Reason for Request
l(i r e. Z,',v ~
o \
',~)
;()o
<;'YUL.--7l.L a-4 .,
/~c..
/' 0
t/^"
/1~1 tlr
/
~
!..uc.:.l )
Current zoning
f!.1
Requested zoning
,ey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Address
a (, '/(1
\Gv;
/J;L""",d
If/lvJJ,~1.. "I
!-4.,./ c ~.........
Name of Applicant
Home Phone 1J/1/dc.vCY /~./ Business Phone
Signature;:kAJ;;', ~-?';'?/
't;;z7-o,/.]'S~
Date J-/(;/,/J
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
',-)
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
________N_____________________________________________---------------
"
\_)
REZONING
PAGE 2
4.
.
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover: "
i
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard butlding setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Recording Fee:
Date paid
8/11/'13
Receipt #
179/5
Rev. 5-0S-93:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
, '\
'-J
~)
26 32 24 14 0001
Paul D & Linda L Mazzei
935 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
2(J24140004
M W Ryan & A J Schumacher
14540 Palm st NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224130002
Daniel J white
1049 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224320002
P. L. Schroeder
720 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224330001
A L Chapman & Lindberg
14212 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
2( '24420018
ASl1iord Dev. Corp. Inc.
3640 - 152nd Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224420020
Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc.
3640 - 152nd Ln NW
Andove r , MN 55304
263224430002
Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc.
14279 Vale st NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224430004
Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc.
3640 - 152nd Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224140002
Paul D & Linda L Mazzei
935 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
233224340013
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224420017
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
263224140003
Paul & Linda Mazzei
935 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224230003
David & Diane Grorud
14545 Palm st NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224410001
Leonard Cochran
3640 - 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224320003
Roger E Carol L Hofstad
684 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224310004
Randall L & Lynn M
Chaffee
614 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224420019
Gail R Skaaden
14315 vale st NW
Andover, MN 55304
233224340013
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224430003
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
263224410001
Leonard S Cochran
3640 - 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224320001
Randall L & Lynn M Chaffee
614 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224310009
Dale H & J L Spaulding
14370 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224420021
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
253224340009
J D & Susan E Rooker
14191 Prairie Rd
Andover, MN 55304
263224430006 263224430007 263224430008
As' ~ord Dev. Corp. Inc. Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc. Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc.
36~) - 152nd Ln NW 3640 - 152nd Ln NW 3640 - 152nd Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andove r , MN 55304
253224330004 263224430009 263224430010
Robert J Nehring Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc. Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc.
3640 - 152nd Ave NW 3640 - 152nd Ln NW 3640 - 152nd Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304
253224340008
Jeffrey & Mildred Johnson
14315 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224430005
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
253224340010
Marilyn M & Ed Gritton
14157 Prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
, '1
L J'224330005
Mark A Menth
14122 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224340003
Thomas L Chouinard
14123 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
253224340003
Thomas L Chouinard
14123 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
363224220003
Douglas C & A J Steele
P.O. Box 638
Andover, MN 55304
:' '224120024
Hn~ls, Inc.
2619 Coon Rapids Blvd
H01
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
363224220004
Craig A & Ruth A
Kostelecky
732 - 140th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
(j
file.-: f\~zoY\.i~ Ash-feY.l 993
263224430011
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
263224430012
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andove r, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
263224430013
Mark A & Peggy S Soderholm
14147 Vale St NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224430014
James G & Cheryl A
Johnson
985 - 123rd Lane NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55448
253224340004
Thomas L Chouinard
14123 prairie Rd NW
Andover, MN 55304
263224430015
Ashford Dev.
3640 - 152nd
Andover, MN
Corp. Inc.
Ln NW
55304
263224430070 353224110001
Ashford Dev. Corp. Inc. Hills, Inc.
3640 - 152nd Ln NW 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd
Andover, MN 55304 H01
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
363224220007 353224120003
David A & Elizabeth Erickson Hills, Inc.
745 - 140th Lane NW 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd
Andove r , MN 55304 H01
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
233224340013
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
363224220008
David C & S L
Szykulski
752 - 140th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
o '1
'...---1
~J
~
/J~,''''<'''',"iF''~"
! ':';
V
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, September 14, 1993 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the rezoning
request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone
property located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
of Section 25 and the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township
32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota from R-1, Single Family
Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban for the purpose of subdividing
the property and constructing single family homes.
The property is generally located south of Andover Boulevard and
east of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, ana west of
prairie Road.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at the
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
L~ ;j~
Vlctorla Vo , City
Clerk
publication dates:
September 3, 1993
September 10, 1993
,,- ....
CITY OF ANDOVER
"...-r
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
1\0.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
ndover Review Committee FORAGENDA
1#'
Discussion Item
ITEM
r-.o.
BY:
wittington Ridge preliminary
Plat
~
The City Council is requested to review the preliminary plat of
wittington Ridge per Ordinance 8 and 10 and all other applicable
ordinances and policies as requested by Ashford Development
Corporation.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary
plat. Their comments are as follows:
General Comments
'-
* The proposed preliminary plat is currently zoned R-1, Single
Family Rural. In addition, the proposed plat is not within the
Metropolitan urban Service Area (MUSA). Note: A portion of
the proposed plat could be served with gravity sanitary sewer.
* The proposed subdivision consists of 21 single family rural
residential lots.
* The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, u.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District, LGU, MPCA and any other agency which
may be interested in the site).
Other Comments:
The Andover Review Committee has not has the opportunity to
review the revised preliminary plat, grading/drainage and erosion
control plan; The revised plan was submitted to the City near
the end of last week. The developer's engineer became very ill
and was not able to submit the plans on time to the City for
review.
~)
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
TO:
/ -
"--)
We are recommending the plan be approved subject to review and
approval by the Andover Review Committee but in addition the
final plat is not to be approved by the City until all items are
complete and the Water Resource Management Plan has been complied
with.
Planning and zoning Commission Recommendation
1. The Commission is recommending a variance be granted for Lot
5, Block 3 for lot frontage from Ordinance 10, Section 9.06A3
as the lot does not meet the 300 feet at the building setback
line.
The area to the east of the building pad of Lot 4, Block 3 is
not identified as wetland. Therefore, the city could give a
variance from Ordinance 10, Section 17.01 as it is shown by
the developer the topography and physical conditions (Ditch
No. 37) cause an exceptional and undue hardship to the
enjoyment of a substantial property right. In addition, the
variance does not adversely affect the adjacent property
owners and Comprehensive Development plan or the spirit and
intent of this ordinance.
, -j
,-I
2. The Commission is recommendi~g that the property line between
Lots 4 and 5, Block 3 be redrawn so that the lot does not have
property on both sides of the ditch. The revised plan in your
packet is to include the change.
3. The Commission is recommending access be provided to the
Sather property as recommended by the Andover Review
Committee to allow the property to be subdivided in the
future as required in Ordinance 10, Section 9.02B.
4. The Commission is recommending a variance from Ordinance 10,
Section 8.04K as the developer did not make application for a
Special Use Permit in conjunction with the preliminary plat.
The developer has admitted that they made an error in not
applying for the permit.
5. The Commission is recommer.ding that the developer provide the
City a revised preliminary plat and grading/drainage/erosion
control plan that provides all information that is required in
Ordinance 10 and other applicable ordinances and comply with
the Water Resource Management plan. The final plat is not to
be approved until requirements are met.
6. The Commission is recommending the westerly temporary cul-de-
sac (155th Lane NW) be removed and a permanent cul-de-sac be
constructed that meets the requirements of Ordinance 10,
section 9.03G.
7. The Commission is recommending a variance from Ordinance 10,
Section 9.03G as the length of the cul-de-sac exceeds the
C~) maximum allowed of 500 feet.
Additional Comments by Commission:
The Commission discussed very carefully the fact that some sort
of disclosure should be made to people purchasing land near
agricultural practices.
C_)
It should be noted that the Coon Creek watershed District has
recommended that a more detailed hydrological analysis be made of
future plats regarding their affect on both residential and
agricultural lands.
park and Recreation Commission Recommendation
The Commission will be reviewing and make recommendations at the
October 7, 1993 meeting as determined in Ordinance 10, Section
9.07. The park dedication is to be determined on the entire
59.676 acres.
8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
a. proposed name is Wittington Ridge.
d. Scale is 1" = 100'
g. The preliminary plat, grading, drainage and erosion control
plan was prepared by Hakanson-Anderson Assoc., Inc.
8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS
b. Total acreage is 59.676.
c. The existing zoning within 300 feet of the proposed plat has
been shown.
~)
f. Location of all existing telephone, gas, electric and other
underground/overhead facilities are not shown on preliminary
plat as per ordinance requirements.
g. The boundary lines within 100 feet of the plat have been
shown along the names of the property owners.
h. A Tree Protection Plan has not been reviewed and approved by
the Tree Inspector. This is a requirement prior to any
construction.
j. A soil boring report has been received by the City. All
unbuildable soils will be required to be removed within all
right-of-ways.
8.03 DESIGN FEATURES
()
a. The proposed right-of-way as indicated is 60 feet.
c. The storm drains and streets plan and profile will be
designed by the developer's engineer and will need to be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
g. The setbacks for each lot are shown.
h. The proposed method of disposing of surface water will
need to be shown on the grading and drainage plan and erosion
control plan.
8.04 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
b. Source of water supply is private wells.
: ) c. Sewage disposal facilities will be private septic system.
~-
g.
j .
9.02
a.
9.03
a.
m.
0 n.
()
d. Rezonings of properties will not be required.
f. Flood Plain Management is the Coon Creek Watershed District
(see Section 9.04(b) for additional information regarding the
100 year flood elevation).
Street lighting is required and the installation costs will
be paid for by the developer.
The total linear road mileage for the proposed plat is 0.76
miles.
STREET PLAN
The typical section, right-of-way and grade are indicated on
the preliminary plat.
STREETS
The proposed right-of-way is shown as 60 feet which conforms
to standards by classification.
Driveway access shall be 60 feet or more from any
intersection.
Boulevard is required to be topsoil and seeded and to provide
erosion control.
9.04 EASEMENTS
b. A drainage easement is shown to follow the 100 year flood
elevation.
9.06 LOTS
e. The developer is responsible to obtain all necessary permits
from the Coon Creek Watersh~d District, DNR, Corps of
Engineers, LGU, MPCA, and any other agency that may be
interested in the site.
9.07 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE
Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation
Commission.
o
()
(]
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WITTINGTON RIDGE
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY " ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. IN
SECTION 21 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mail~d notice thereof, the
Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing with
some opposition, largely regarding the ecological aspects of the
proposed preliminary plat of Wittington Ridge.
WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the
preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the
following:
1. A variance be granted for Lot 5, Block 3 for lot frontage from
Ordinance 10, Section 9.06A3 as the lot does not meet the 300
feet at the building setback lines.
2. A variance be granted for Lot 5, Block 3 for lot area from
Ordinance 10, Section 9.06A3 as the lot does not meet the minimum
108,900 square feet requirement.
3. Access be provided to the Sather property as recommended by the
Andover Review Committee to allow the property to be subdivided
in the future as required in Ordinance 10, Section 9.02B.
4. A variance from Ordinance 10, Section 8.04K as the developer did
not make application for a Special Use Permit in conjunction with
the preliminary plat.
5. The developer provide the City a revised preliminary plat and
grading/drainage/erosion control plan that provides all
information that is required in Ordinance 10 and other applicable
ordinances and comply with the Water Resource Management Plan.
The final plat is not to be approved until requirements are met.
6. The westerly temporary cul-de-sac (155th Lane NW) be removed and
permanent cul-de-sac be constructed that meets requirements of
Ordinance 10, Section 9.03G.
7. A variance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.03G as the length of the
cul-de-sac exceeds the maximum allowed of 500 feet.
8. Street plan and profile of streets and storm sewers be submitted,
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
9. The developer is responsible to obtain all necessary permits from
the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU,
MPCA and any other agency that may be interested in the site.
10. Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation
Commission.
()
o
o
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover
to hereby approve the preliminary plat of wittington Ridge.
Adopted by the City. Council of the City of Andover this 5th
"
day of
October , 19 93.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5. 1993
AGENDA
tn
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Discussion
ITEM
f\O.
Planning
~
BY:
Ordinance No. 95
Boulevard Encroachments
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~.
I
'-../
The City Council, on August 17, 1993, directed the Planning and
Zoning Commission to revisit Ordinance No. 95, examine other
communities regulations and make a recommendation to the Council
at the October 5, 1993 meeting.
Planning & Zoning Commission Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 14, 1993 and
reviewed other communities ordinances, reviewed a video on
accidents with mailboxes and discussed the safety aspect of
encroachments into the boulevard. The Commission tabled the item
pending further review by the City Attorney on the idea of a hold
harmless clause provision in the Ordinance.
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 28, 1993 and
made the recommendation to the Council to remove Section 12,
Appeal to Council from the Ordinance and to change Section 4,
Exceptions. The change to Section 4 being to remove a portion of
Sub. a. so it would read, Mailboxes or newspaper delivery box
stands.
Attached are the minutes and staff reports from the Commission
meetings. Upon Council approval Staff will amend Ordinance No.
95.
-) MOTION BY:
- /
SECOND BY:
TO:
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATESeptember 28, 1993
4. Discussion - Cont.
Boulevard Encroachment
Ordinance no. 95
Planning
David L. Carlberg
BY: City planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
.y,k
AGENDA ITEM
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
REQUEST
The Commission tabled this item at the September 14, 1993
Commission meeting pending further review of the Ordinance by
Staff and the City Attorney. The Commission directed Staff to
revise the Ordinance and have the Attorney respond to the idea of
a "hold harmless clause" for mailboxes that are non-conforming.
Staff in listening to the tape of the minutes from the September
14th meeting was unsure of the re~isions requested by the
Commission. The following are possible changes to the ordinance
for consideration by the Commission.
1. Remove a portion or all of the appeal procedure.
'-
2. Include in the Ordinance a hold harmless clause for those
mailboxes that are non-conforming.
Staff has not received comments from the City Attorney at this
time, but will present any additional information received to the
Commission at the meeting.
~)
, ')
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 95
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING BOULEVARD ENCROACHMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR
AN APPEAL PROCESS.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
Section 1. Purpose
:_)
It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City of Andover to
promote and provide unrestricted and safe passage within
boulevard areas in public rights-of-way while at the same time
promoting the betterment of the aesthetic qualities of the
community. The Council recognizes that certain encroachments
located within the boulevard area will impede the safe and free
flow of pedestrian traffic and will cause imminent danger to
vehicular traffic, including bicycles, leaving the paved surface
area. The Council further recognizes that certain improvements
to the boulevard area will neither impede pedestrian traffic nor
create imminent danger to vehicular traffic leaving the street.
The Council also recognizes that certain encroachments which
could constitute an imminent danger to vehicular traffic are
permitted within the boulevard area out of necessity. In an
attempt to balance these diverse interests, the Council adopts
the following regulations.
Section 2. Definitions
A. Encroachment. Encroachment shall mean any object, live or
~nan~mate, situated within a public right-of-way, including
but not limited to, posts, trees, bushes, rocks, utility
poles and boxes, retaining walls, etc.
B. Boulevard. Boulevard shall mean that area of a public right-
of-way extending from the back of the curb to the right-of-
way limi t.
C. Impede. Impede shall mean the interference with pedestrian
traffic to an unreasonable degree.
D. Imminent Danger. Imminent danger shall mean the likelihood
of damage to a vehicle or injury to a pedestrian upon
contact with the encroachment.
Section 3. Permit
Any person who intends to place an encroachment as defined herein
within the public right-of-way shall obtain a permit prior
thereto from the Building Official unless such encroachment is
excepted pursuant to Section 4 hereof. No permit shall be
granted for encroachments which would be considered nuisances as
defined in Section 5 herein.
\
o
Section 4. Exceptions
The terms and provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to the
following:
a. Mailbox or newspaper delivery box stands.cen3i3tin9 of a
pest no lar-qe-r--than-f.ou-r (4) i-nches--oy-four-+4-t--i'nc-hes-;-
o
)
_I
~--)
b. Traffic and directional signs.
c. utility poles and utility structures.
d. Fire hydrants
e. Bus shelters or benches
Section 5. Nuisances.
Any encroachment located within a public right-of-way which
impedes pedestrian traffic or constitutes imminent danger to
vehicular or pedestrian traffic on any boulevard constitutes a
public nuisance.
Section 6. Sight Triangles
Encroachments within a sight triangle as defined in City
Ordinance 8 shall meet the requirements of this ordinance or
Ordinance 8, whichever is more restrictive.
Section 7. Maintenance of Boulevard.
Except as may be prohibited by this Ordinance or other provisions
of the City Ordinances, the owner or occupant of property
abutting a publi~'right-of-way shall be responsible for the
maintenance of the boulevard area adjacent to their property.
The owner or occupant shall at a minimum maintain the lawn and
trees in the boulevard. Any additional improvements made shall
be maintained by the owner or'occupant at their own risk and
expense. The City shall not be responsible for the maintenance
of or liable for injury to or from such improvements and the
property owner or occupant agrees to hold the City harmless from
any claims arising out of any injury or damage to or from such
improvements.
Section 8. Violation. A violation of the Ordinance shall
constitute a m~sdemeanor.
Section 9. Enforcement. The Building Official shall be
responsible for the enforcement of the provisions of this
ordinance. Upon determining that a violation of the provisions
of this ordinance exists, the Building Official shall, in
writing, order the discontinuance of the nuisance and shall order
the action necessary to abate such nuisance. Such order shall be
served upon the owner and/or occupant of the premises involved,
in person or by certified mail. The Building Official shall give
the affected parties a reasonable period of time to abate the
nuisance, which time may vary depending upon the nature of the
encroachment. The Building Official may extend the time for
compliance upon good cause being shown by the affected party. In
no instance shall the time for compliance be less than seven (7)
days nor more than six (6) months.
Section 10. Abatement of Nuisances. If no appeal is taken, if an
appeal is denied or the order amended, and if the time for
compliance or any extension thereof has expired and the nuisance
is not abated, the encroachment shall be removed by an employee
or agent of the City. The costs of such removal shall be
recorded and forwarded to the City Clerk. The costs of removal
together with a reasonable administrative charge shall be
certified to the property taxes for said property.
'- )
~
,
\
,-/
'\
o
Section 11. Appeal
Any party aggrieved by an order of the Building Official may
appeal such decision to the Andover Review Committee. The appeal
must be taken within seven days after the receipt of a written
order from the Building Official, by the filing of a notice of
appeal on forms provided by the Building Official. Such notice
of appeal shall contain the names and signatures of all parties
aggrieved and the grounds upon which the appeal is being taken.
The matter shall be reviewed by the Andover Review Committee
within seven days. The applicant shall be notified of the
findings in writing.
se~on 12. Appeal to Council
All d~'sions of the Andover Review Committee shall be
appeal t the City Council in the following manner:
A. Within se n days after the Andover Review Commit e has made
its decision the Building Official shall notif the
applicant of i decision and of the applic~ 's right to
appeal. Within ven (7) days thereafte~:~e applicant or
any person aggrieve by such decision file with the
Building Official a w 'tten request at such decision be
appealed to Council.
B. The Building Official sha re r the matter to the City
Council within. ten (10) day f such appeal. The appeal
shall be placed on the a~a the next regular Council
meeting. The Buildin~fficial shall notify the appellant
of the date, time, ~ place of suc meeting. The
appellant may ap~ar in person or wit counsel, and present
evidence in support of his appeal.
C. The City CounCil shall have the authority affirm, amend,
or rejec~he decision of the Andover Review ommittee. An
amend~t to or rejection of the Andover Review ommittee's
dec~sion shall be adopted by an affirmative vote ~ a
majority of the City Council. ~
/'
Section 13. Paramount Public Use. The City or any of its agents
and/or any utillty company authorized by law or the City to
utilize the boulevard area shall have a paramount right to use of
the boulevard area, subject to control by the city. Any
improvements placed in the boulevard by the owner or occupant
shall be removed at the owner's or occupant's expense if the
boulevard area is needed for a paramount use. This shall
include, but not be limited to, the installation of new or repair
or replacement of existing utilities.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day
of
May
, 19 91 .
Attest:
CITY OF ANDOVER
'f- (
v(l,--,--l'>-v~ \0 ;
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
( '-/- {(,;;/
( v~ r.AA./ ;,.a.....
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
(~)
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
September 14, 1993 - Minutes
Page 10
Boulevard Encroachment Discussion - Ordinance 95
Mr. Carlberg noted that the City Council reviewed two appeals
where the property owners had brick mailboxes and lantern pillars
in the right-of-way. The Council tabled these appeals and
directed staff to contact other communities to compare
regulations on boulevard encroachments and bring the information
to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation back to
the Council.
Mr. Carlberg then showed the Commission a portion of a video where
cars hit b~ick mailboxes, noting extensive damage was done to the
vehicles..
Commissioner Apel stated that his concern is the safety factor and
also the Public Works Department. Chairperson Dehn felt that
safety of vehicles is a major concern.
Mr. Carlberg explained that we have a number of these mailboxes in
the city and we have not done a good job of enforcing this
ordinance. Coon Rapids has the same ordinance we have and they
have suspended the appeal portion of the o~dinance.
Robert Bannister, 14971 Bluebird Street N.W. explained that his
appeal was one of those heard by the Counc11 and tabled. He felt
\ that because he made his mailbox attractive, 'he is being penalized
1'--) for it.
Commissioner Peek suggested that everyone with a non-conforming
mailbox should give the city a hold harmless agreement.
Staff was directed to contact the city attorney regarding the
liability, revise the ordinance, and bring it back to the
September 28th meeting.
Chairperson Dehn declared the meeting adjourned at 12:35 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
U' 0f&
Vicki Volk
Acting Recording Secretary
\
I ,--)
~j
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE September 14. 1993
7. Discussion
Boulevard Encroachment
Ordinance no. 95
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg ~
BY: City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council on August 17, 1993, directed the Planning and
Zoning Commission to review Ordinance No. 95, Boulevard
Encroachment Ordinance, in regard to mailboxes and other
encroachments. The direction of the Council came at the review of
two appeals to the Ordinance at the August 17, 1993 meeting.
The first appeal to the Ordinance was in regard to the placement
of a concrete and brick mailbox in violation of the,provisions of
Ordinance No. 95. The Ordinance requires a 4'x4' post for
mailboxes. The other appeal was for brick lanterns located in the
boulevard (right-of-way). Both appeals were deemed by City Staff
I and the Andover Review Committee to be a threat to the health,
'- safety and general welfare of the residents as well as to Public
Works Staff during snow removal.
The Council asked Staff to contact other communities to compare
regulations on boulevard encroachments and bring the information
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and
recommendation back to the Council.
Other City Ordinances
City of Anoka
The City of Anoka does not allow encroachments into the boulevard
other than vegetative planting not to exceed 3' in height (cannot
create sight problem). Anoka has not had a problem with brick
mailboxes or pillars in boulevard.
City of Blaine
Does not have a problem with brick mailboxes or pillars in
boulevard.
Residents have placed large rocks on boulevard to prevent vehicles
from driving on their yard where there are curves in the road.
Blaine requires they be removed when encroachment obstructs the
) removal of snow or creates a traffic hazard (sight distance) at
~ intersections.
,J
Page Two
Discussion - Blvd.
Ordinance No. 95
September 14, 1993
Encroachment
City of Bloomington
No construction of structures in right-of-way.
Does not encourage brick mailboxes in boulevard. Can be done on
an approved basis by the City.
City of Coon Rapids
Ordinance is same as the City of Andover.
Suspended enforcement of their boulevard encroachment ordinance as
directed by their City Council due to the appeal procedure before
the Council.
City of Eden prairie
No structure in boulevard or right-of-way.
went through same problems as Andover is experiencing.
Allows brick mailboxes with approval by City and prefers they be
_)grOUped. Pillars marking driveways must be located on property.
If any damage occurs to mailboxes City is not responsible for
replacement or repair.
City of Edina
Allowed some brick mailboxes. All are located 2'- 5' behind curb.
These are located in the areas where home prices average 2 to 3
million dollars.
Attached are additional city ordinances and information provided
by the League of Minnesota Cities. Also attached is Ordinance No.
95, Boulevard Encroachment.
\
,~)
~
..-....
.:'~:J j.
, ,
)
!:'~-<
'---'
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 4
(Assessment Reduction/R. Sonsteby, Continued)
justification for assessing her lots more, especially since she was told
by the City Clerk that her lots were considered a part of the Meadows of
Round Lake. The City is saying the Nedegaard lots were only 80 feet and
hers are 100 feet; but she argued that some of the Nedegaard lots were
also 90 feet and they were only assessed $1,600 each. She also felt
discriminated against when in 1981 she was required to pay the
equivalent of a lOa-foot lot for a lot that had only 32 feet of
frontage. One other lot had only 15 feet of frontage, but that owner
only paid for the actual frontage. Ms. Sonsteby also alleged that in
1984, she, as the developer, paid for everything in Rosella's Addition,
even for the sewer, water, blacktop and curbing that benefitted another
parcel. Ms. Sonsteby again argued that the Nedegaard contract indicates
he is to pay for all extensions. Since she was told her lots are a part
of that development, and there are no Resolutions specifically about her
lots, she felt her lots should be assessed the same.
Mr. Haas explained the trunk runs past Ms. Sonsteby's lot, but she is
only being assessed a lateral charge per the City's policy., Ms.
Sonsteby came into the process after the petition for the Meadows of
Round Lake and the signing of the Development Contract. Ms. Sonsteby is
being assessed $22/front foot per the City's policy. Mayor McKelvey
believed the contract between Ms. Sonsteby and the developers of the
Meadows of Round Lake is that they would pay the lateral charge for Ms.
Sonsteby. He felt that is a private legal agreement that does not
involve the City.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that the City Council deny the
request of Rosella Sonsteby for a reduction in assessments for lateral
service to three of her lots which she is developing. The assessments
are currently $2,200 per lot and the Council reconfirms that amount.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Dalien) vote.
~ APPEAL ORDINANCE 95/149TH AND BLUEBIRD
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the appeal of Robert and Renee Bannister to allow
a brick mailbox structure to remain in the city right of way at 14971
Bluebird Street NW. The Andover Review Committee found the mailbox
structure, while aesthetically appealing and does eliminate vandalism to
a degree, does not meet ordinance nor postal requirements and must be
removed. The ordinance requirement was enacted in 1991, and the
Building Official found the violation and submitted a letter to the
owners. He had photographs of the structure.
1.,,-)
'--'"'
In Council discussion, Mr. Carlberg stated the purpose of the ordinance
is a safety factor for Public Works employees who might accidentally hit
the solid structure, and it becomes a snow maintenance problem. The
postal regulation is the box must be back from the curb. There are many
such mailboxes around the City, so he predicted many more appeals coming
before the Council on this issue. Councilmember Perry agreed that the
mailboxes are much more appealing, but felt such structures in the right
of way are a problem and should be removed.
e:}
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 5
(Appeal Ordinance 95/149th and Bluebird, Continued)
About five or six residents addressed the Council arguing there are
many, many mailboxes in the City that do not meet the ordinance
requirements. Those in Kensington Estates are 6x6 posts, not 4x4 as the
ordinance requires. Such mailboxes are very common in many of the
cities with higher-priced houses such as Eden Prairie, Bloomington,
Edina. They asked why is it a danger in one community and not in
others. Mrs. Bannister stated they are willing to move it back off the
curb and mark it with flags and reflectors. This looks nice, as opposed
to those who have various tubes and vandalized mailboxes. Mr.
Bannister stated he would be willing to tear it down and start over to
set the mailbox out on a post. He could submit a drawing that would
have to be approved by the City. Another resident stated the ordinance
was passed in 1991, but his mailbox structure has been up since 1989.
He felt he should be grandfathered, but he received a letter today
indicating a violation.
. ,
\
,.... I
C:
Council discussed again noted that such mailboxes are aesthetically
pleasing but are a safety concern. They acknowledged that Staff was
appropriate in following procedure, but also felt that possibly the
Planning and Zoning Commission should look at the requirement again, see
what other cities are doing; decide whether or not the current ordinance
is still practical, and make a recommendation.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, to send the issue to, the
Planning and zoning Commission for further consideration of review of
the Ordinance for mailboxes only. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent
(Dalien) vote.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, to table the appeal request until
the first meeting in October. (October 5, 1993) Motion carried on a 4-
Yes, 1-Absent (Dalien) vote:
@ APPEAL/ORDINIlNCE .5/AMAR/H.. HaTN LANE lM
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the appeal request of Todd and Glenda Amar to
allow two brick lantern pillars to remain in the city right of way at
1469 140th Lane NW. They are located eight feet behind the curb, but
the city boulevard is 13.5 feet to the property line. The Andover
Review Committee has recommended the structures be removed. The builder
of the house had given his word that the pillars would be removed within
two weeks of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. That was not
done.
.~)
f
'-"'
Todd Amar. 1469 140th Lane NW - stated he was not notified that the City
had an agreement with his builder. He never knew there was a problem
until he received the letter from the City. Those pillars were in the
original building plans. He had pictures of his pillars plus many other
monuments located on boulevards within the City of Andover. By
definition, the ordinance requires no trees, rocks, etc., in the right
of way; but in driving around the City, there are numerous violations.
0)
Regular Andover city Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 6
(Appeal Ordinance 95/Amar/1469 140th Lane NW, Continued)
Is the City going to require all trees and other items to be removed as
well? He felt this issue is the same as the previous one dealing with
mailbox structures and asked that the ordinance be reviewed. Attorney
Hawkins advised that the ordinance applies to structures placed in the
boulevards subsequent to the adoption of this ordinance. Mr. Carlberg
stated the existing trees in the right of way would be a nonconforming
issue. The boulevards are for the purpose of installing utility lines
and to leave it clear for future maintenance
Mr. Amar - was willing to live with the possibility that the pillars may
have to be removed if maintenance is required in that area. He accepts
that ris~. The pillars are an aesthetic improvement to the property,
but it would not work to move them back to the property line. He again
argued there are such monuments allover the place both within Andover
and in other cities.
.o)
ty/
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, that the Andover City Council
deny the appeal of Todd and Glenda Amar for the property located at 1469
140th Lane NW to allow the brick pillars to remain in the city right of
way. The reason for denial is it is not consistent with Ordinance No.
95; and while the City Council has determined there may be a need to
address the ordinance as it relates to mailboxes, the City Council has
not directed the review of the ordinance for other structures in the
right of way. DISCUSSION: Attorney Hawkins thought that the Minnesota
Statutes 160.27 states it is unlawful to place or maintain any structure
within the limits of any highway, which applies to state, county and
municipal streets. He did feel there is some provision that authorizes
cities to have certain encroachments that wouldn't be a violation. The
City does have the ordinance regulating this.
Mr. Amar - asked that this item be given the same review as the mailbox
issue just previously discussed. These types of monuments are becoming
common in landscaping, plus there are other types of landscapes within
right of ways. A very, very large portion of Andover residents are
affected by this issue. Councilmember Knight felt that given the
possible magnitude of the problem, that the Planning and Zoning
Commission should address this issue swell.
VOTE ON MOTION: Yes-Jacobson, Perry; NO-McKelvey, Knight; Absent-
Dalien. Motion failed.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Knight, that this also be referred to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for review at their September 14 meeting
and again reiterate the fact that Staff and the Andover Review committee
have acted properly in their recommendations. Motion carried on a 3-
Yes, I-No (Jacobson), I-Absent (Dalien) vote.
C;)
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Knight, that we table Agenda Item No.8,
Appeal/Ordinance 95/Amar/1469 140th Lane NW pending recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent
(Dalien) vote.
. -,
" 11'111
'~):ifll I TIr~~
~
ABILITY OF THE CITY TO REGULATE PLACEr~ENT OF rlAILBOXES WITHIN
THE CITY.
March
league of minneEjOL8 cities
, 0, , 987 368
* 525J
Roger Becker
Mayor
Box 36
New Auburn, MN 55366
Dear Mr. Becker:
This is a follow-up to our phone conversation yesterday. You
asked about a city's ability to regulate the placement of
mailboxes within the citYr
GeneralLy, a city has ample authority to regulate streets. This
authority includes the power to remove obstructions to their
free use. ' However, .it wouLd seem questionable whether this
authority includes the power to regulate the Location of
mai'lboxes.
~'_) "ArticLe One 57 of the 'U ~S'~--ConSErrUe-ldn--giYes Congress-the"power
to establish post offices and postal roads. This power is
exercised primarily through postal regulations. If there are
any conflicts between a city's ordinance regulating the
placement of mailboxes and postal reguLations, "...the
regUlations necessarily would pre-empt the ordinance under the
Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution," Grover City v. U.S.
Postal Service, 391 F.Supp. 982 (1975). In that case, Grover
Ciey's ordinance regUlated the curbside placement of mailboxes.
62 AmJur 2d, Post Office 523 also indicates that "The location
and design of mailboxes...are matters within the control of the
federal postal authorities...local authorities have no power and
are under no duty with respect to the location of a mailbox...."
132 ALR 1401 also contains an article on the ability of a city
to regulate the placement of mailboxes.
The material that I have looked at seems to distinguish between
rural delivery routes and other streets within the city
boundaries. WhiLe the city does not appear to have the
authority to regUlate mailboxes in either case, the federal
pre-emption seems much clearer in the case or rural routes.
From the facts you gave me, I was not sure which type of roads
we were discussing.
:,-)
I spoke with someone in the Postal Inspector's office in
1 ..::~~ '.l/'II\i("rs.t.\/ ,:-,VF:nLlf:' f'2,!",;", st., P,;l,I, " IInnesor", 55 1 01 (6 '12) 227-5600
. -
'.,
-, .-.,.
Minneapolis. It appears that the postal regulations involving
the location of mailboxes merely require that they be
accessible to the mail carrier. It would thus seem that a
city regulation that did not affect accessibility would not be
in conflict with federal regulations. For example, a city
ordinance that regulated the location of mailboxes for
snow-plowing or mowing purposes, but did not affect the access
to the boxes, would arguably be consistent with federal
regulations.
I hope that this has been of some assistance. As is our policy
with matters of a legal nature, I am forwarding a copy of this
letter to your city attorney.,
If you should have any questions, feel free to call.
.
/-j
'-'
Sincerely,
Jay Squires
Research Assistant
,
....-._J-...... -- --..-,--
~~)
I VI\'"' .;l 1/ 1 j/ 'd't.
INFORMATION SERVICES
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Avenue East
st. Paul, MN 55101-2526
Classification #
3lo0
I-;).O-Cf?
Date
, '
)
,~
Subj ect
Municipality ~
AA , c},oel
~-)
/NOTICE: {~~t
~./ \ ST. MICHAEL
ORDINANCE NO. 80e11114192
An Ordinancu Amending Sl Michael
Subd'Jision Ordnance No. 60 10 Regu_
late I.Dcalion 01 Mail Boxes. Newspaper
Boxes and Advertising Boxes.
The City Counc:il 01 1he City 01 Sl
Michael Ordains:
Section ,. I.o"'..alion 01 MaiJ Boxes.
Newspaper Boxes and Advenising
Boxes: Sl MIChael Subdivision 0rdi-
nance No. 60 is hereby amended by
adding Section 5,09 10 read as 1olIows:
5.09 Location 01 Mail Boxes. Newspa-
per Boxes and Advenising Boxes.
,. Definition. Wherewr rel8mld 10
'herein, "boxes. shaJJ reler 10 aJJ mail
boxes, newspaper boxes and advenis-
ing boxes wherein either mail is dis1lib-
llled, newspapers and magazines are
dsllibuted or advertising is placed lor the
use 01 residents ollhe City.
2. Designation by Planning Commis-
sion. The Sl Michael Planning Commis.
sion, subject 10 the criteria set lorth
herein, shall designate !he location 01 all
boxes lor all subdivisions crealed pursu-
anI 10 this Ordinance.
3. Location 01 Boxes on Regular
SlreelS. All boxes located on regular
SITeelS shall be placed on one side ot the
SITeel in a line 01 travel approved by the
Planning Commission and the pOSI 01.
fice, and a prescribed distance 1Wi<rf
from the curb, so as to allow easy acxess
by the mail carrier,
4. Location cl Soxas on Cul-d&-sac
SITeets, All boxes tor houses in a cul-<le.
sac shall be localed in a duster althe
BnITance to !he radius 01 the aJ/-de-sac,
as approved by the Planning Commis-
sion and the pOSl office, and in a pre-
scribed distance sway from the aJrb so
as 10 allow easy access by the mail
carrier."
Section 2. Effective Date: This Ordi.
nance shall bec:cme effective from and
alter its passage and publication accord.
ing to law,
Passed by the Sl Michael City Couneil
this 14th day ot January, 1992.
City 01 Sl Michael
Joanne Si/bemick, Mayor
Allest:
Dawn Grossinger, City ClerK
Published in the Crow River News
MOnday,Jan.20,l992, '
\. CRN72
, '
L,
,-/
INFORMATION SERVICE
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Ave E.
St~ ~aul, MN 55101
V
/ '
- . - )
.~/
~UD1fc notice
)' Ordlnance'1f;;Y:'1r4'~7 ," ·
~ OrdlnaDce Rqulat1nlthe, 1
\' Placement aDd Installation ,I
of Mailboxes Within the
City of Dawson A;", ";',-'
The City Council of the City ,of:
Dawson does hereby ordain: .. 'l '.''' ,-' .
Section 1: INTENT: The intent of this
ordinance is 10 reduce the number of
mailboxes located on City S!reelS. The
reasons for this, are 10 make mow
removal a more efficient process, ~d
10 enhance the loots oflhe', Clly'_.
struts: ' " ': "".-~I .::l., ','
Section 2. GROUPING MJ\ILBOXES:
AIl mailboxes shall be clusmed in :
lIOups of not less than four. ~Lmo.re,
than six. Groups of less than four will
be allowed if my mailbox is more 1han
250 feet from the property it ,serves.
The approved size of these mailboxes
shall be 19" long. 6-112"' wide. and 9,"
high. Mailboxes shall be erec~ed upon
a sundardized -pole lD the specificauons
of U.S. Postal Semce md MnOOT;
Section 3. LOCATION: The
Postmaster. City Manager. and Head of
City Maintenance shall produce a
Mailbox Location Plan for the City and
designate group mai~b?xloc.ations.
ResidenlS replacing eXlSung mallboxes
will check with City Hall for!:l!lt"D.eW
group box locations. <,
Section 4. HANDICAPPED PERSONS:
Any handicapped or elderiy person who
would ltave difficulty using a group bo~
location shall be exempt from thiS
ordinance upon notification of handicap
or physical condition 10 City Clerk.
Municipal Building. '
Secton S. CUL-DE.SACS: Group:
mailbox stands shall not be located in
my cul-de-sacs. Box locations' will, be'
allowed on streets entering and, leaving'
the cul-de-sac.
Section 6. INSTALLATION IN NEW
DEVELOPMENTS: The' City
Maintenance Department shaIl install
mailbox platforms in all new
developmenu after the stree~. ar~
complete. All costs shall be"paytble.
immedia1Cly 10 the City Clerk s .Office.:;
Dawson. Minnesota. ' ...
~)
Classification # ~~p)
Municipality _lJa.LU.son
Date to-- 1- '11
Subject
, ," :l'
r:;.... Section 7. FEE 'FOR"-N'EW:::
I::"... DEVELOPMENTS: A per dwelling unit
~~4.:. fee" will be recommended as detennined
necessary by the Head 9f '~ily
Miinlelllnce. 10 the City Council who
sha1l set the per dwelling unit,~e~ ,,in ..
the current fee StIUcture. The per unit
dwelling fee shall be charged for ,the
installation of mailboxes and ~taiidS in .
, new developments. Such charge Shall
be' added 10 the building permit. at, the
time of issue. The City Mainlellance
Department budget shaIl be' directly
reimbursed 10 cover costs involved
Section 8. ALL OTHER RESIDENCES
AND BUSINESSES: Approved mailbox'
platforms and, polleses s sll&lhalll be, available
from the City~e~~artmcnt
at: a cost to eover 'malCri~h~lnd labor
InWediately payablo 10 Ute City Clerk.
Dawson. Minnesota.
Section 9. MAINTENANCE:
Maintenance of the mailbox platforms
shall be the responsibility of the ..._....._.___u
residents served.
Section 10. PENALTY: Any penon
violating any provision of this
ordinance shall be punished by a fine
of not more than S700.. or
imprisonment in the County jail for
not more than 90 days or both. plus
the cost of prosecution in the case.
Section 11. EFFECTIVE DATE: This
ordinance becomes effective upon its
passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council this 1st
day of October. 1991.
Richard J. Pollei
U Mayor
5;).15
~3bg J
ATIESI':
Melva Lmon
~ty Clerk 12-1c
'-)
ftAlLBOX POl.ICY
"arch 26, llIn
A policy haa been adopted by Weight County and the U.S. Poatal Service
conceening anowplowing and aailboKea aa followa:
~...-: :
I
1. Property ownera are encouraged to uae the recommended .ailbox support.
aa ahown on the reveeae aide of thia aheet.
2. Any damages to a mailbox aa the reault of anowplowing viII be reported
by the Box Owner to the Highway Department .a aoon .a poaaible.
3. Material to repair or replace mailbox or aupport aa . reault of
negligence on the part of a County Employe. will be aupplied by Wright
County, peovided no violations of any lawa are involv,d on the part of
the Box Owner and provided ,that the installation guidelinea are
followed. " " ....
.
4. Damage to a nonconforming mailbox and support viII be the responsi-
bility of the Box Ovner and the County viII assume no reaponaibility.
~. Patron's address and/or name ahould appear on the box.
Y~ur cooperation in complying with these recommendations ia appreciated.
Should you have any questions" please feel free to contact us at the Wright
Cvunty Highway Department.
~a2-7374 Maintenance Superintendent
or 1-800-362-3667 (ext. 7374)
~ounty Highway Engineer
Wright County
')
~ .I
_.._----_.._---------_.._~----------------------------------------------------
SOMETBING TO TBIN~ ABOUT
----)
Sere's the problem
It's Janua~y 10, there's 10 inches of anow on the ground, 30 inches of
s~ow piled up by your mailbox, and your mailbox is 10 feet away from its
post...knocked down again by that doggone snowplow for the fourth time this
winter.
Next spring, you decide, you'll plant that mailbox on a really sturdy
post that no snowplow can affect! How about a nice cement-filled milk can
like your neighbor across the way? Or a wire cage filled with large rocks
and a post supported in the middle?
But wait, that may not be a good idea...Sign posts along the edge of
county and state highways must meet required highway standards, which over
the years have been extended to areas adjacent to the traveled way.
Mailpox post~ ~hould also meet the~e sign standards. ,
A hazard i~ anything that can cause damage or injury if struck by an
errant vehicle. A mailbox and it~ support can damage a ,vehicle that
~trikes it, but light-weight support~ will cause. minimum of damage and
are not considered a "hazard" under this definition.
This is no~ ~o with some of the more mas~ivemailboxsupportssuch.as
plowshares, concrete pillars or stone aggregate held together by a wire
cage you might find placed along Minnesota roads. . If hit, the~e can cause
extensive damage to a car, bike or motorcycle, not to mention the occupants
and operators of said vehicles. Also, if the vehicle ride~ upon a massive
aupport, the driver could lose control of the car. This can throw the car
back into the path of other vehicles or cause it to turn over.
Finally, if a serie~ of mailboxes mounted improperly on a horizontal
plank is struck by a careening vehicle, the whole a~~embly could be thrust'
through the passenger compartment--spearing the occupants.
Does all this really .atter?
You bet it does. Not only will you meet the required highway
standards and possibly save a life, you may also relieve yourself of ~
liability on your insurance, should there ever be an accident on you~
property.
It makes good sense to follow the guidelines put out by federal, .tate
and county highway agencies. ~So plant your mailbox lafely todayl
~
'~J
RECOMMENDED MAIL BOX SUPPORTS
(STEEL POST) (WOOD POST)
Il - l-I/%" 'wooo niDI
~ 1/.(' 1l0LT
see. A-A
~ ClAMP AVAA.A8U:
WHCRE AUTO
TJoIlPtPE fTTilNCS
AAE SOUl
A
e~
,..~
...
,~
3'z
:1111
45.~w
r PIPE SlEEVE
45. ELBOw
A
1-1/.(' STt'EL PIPE
3. TO 4.
O~OE EDCE Of'
SHLOULDER
STtD. PIPE
AlITRNATE SOX ATTACHMENT-
, Lri :
~~)
f
4t' IlIN. TO SHOULDER
J
=r-
CHAIN
. nilS TYPE OF' "oum w.s WORI(Lll WEU..
rOR ""'NY YE.ARS IN WRICHT COUfolTY OUE
TO ITS YlEUlING ASIl1TY.
- SEE WRICHT COUNTt HIGHWAY DEFT. rOR
OTHER OFTlONS.
ILLEGAL MAIL
BOX SUPPORT
EXAMPLES:
1l1U( CANS OR BARRELS
nlJ.(o Wffii CONCR(T(
OR PARTS or OLD FAAI.I
IMCHINERY.
,--)
II:
e~
,..c
":~
~;i
WOOD f1U.Dt
1'-1" ~
3. TO 4'
OUTSIDE mCE Of'
SHOULDER
. RECOMMENDED '
. MULTIPLE INSTALLATION..
32"
WIN. 4t'
O(.ul RURAl.. POSTAt. PAmON:
ON BOiALF OF' AU. ROAD AIJTliORmrs. niE "'NNESOTA
O('PARTUEm' Of' '!1WISPORTAnON w.s OEVELOpm 2
Sl'ANO.o.RO IolAJL BOX INSl'J.U).TIOHS WHICH ARE RECOI.I-
"CHOEO FOR YOUR USE IN THE MNT YOUR Il.AIL BOX
HCEOS RCP'-"CEuEm'. IHSOJ.U).TIONS OF' THIS TYPE HOT
ONLY SPEEOS UP OEUV(RY OF' YOUR 1.IAJl. BUT Al.1.0WS
SNOW PLOW,NC EOUIPuENT TO 00 A COOO FAST JOB OF
ClLAAlNC THE SNeW ",01.1 YOUR ROoIoOS DURING niE
WINTrR 1.I0m'I1S. ,105 A RESULT. TH(RE IS A SIo.\IINC IN
COST TO DELIVER I.IAJL AS WELL 105 A SIo.\IINC IN ROAD
WJNTENANCE COST. THIS -'U ADOS UP TO A SIo.\IINC IN
TAXPAY!RS OOUJJlS.
RURAL POSTAL PATRON
~)
{ '.
'\;J
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 5
(Appeal Ordinance 95/149th and Bluebird, Continued)
About five or six residents addressed the council arguing there are
many, many mailboxes in the City that do not meet the ordinance
requirements. Those in Kensington Estates are 6x6 posts, not 4x4 as the
ordinance requires. such mailboxes are very common in many of the
cities with higher-priced houses such as Eden prairie, Bloomington,
Edina. They asked why is it a danger in one community and not in
others. Mrs. Bannister stated they are willing to move it back off the
curb and mark it with flags and reflectors. This looks nice, as opposed
to those who have various tubes and vandalized mailboxes. Mr.
Bannister stated he would be willing to tear it down and start over to
set the mailbox out on a post. He could submit a drawing that would
have to be approved by the City. Another resident stated the ordinance
was passed in 1991, but his mailbox structure has been up since 1989.
He felt he should be grandfathered, but he received a letter today
indicating a violation.
Council discussed again noted that such mailboxes are aesthetically
pleasing but are a safety concern. They acknowledged that Staff was
appropriate in following procedure, but also felt that possibly the
Planning and zoning commission should look at the requirement again, see
what other cities are doing, decide whether or not the current ordinance
is still practical, and make a recommendation.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, to send the issue to the
Planning and zoning Commission for further consideration of review of
the Ordinance for mailboxes only. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent
(Dalien) vote.
.~ "
\~)
I.'.
C>
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, to table the appeal request until
the first meeting in October. (October 5, 1993) Motion carried on a 4-
Yes, 1-Absent (Dalien) vote:
ij APPKAL/ORDINANCK 95/IlHllR11469 140TH LANK ""
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the appeal request of Todd and Glenda Amar to
allow two brick lantern pillars to remain in the city right of way at
1469 140th Lane NW. They are located eight feet behind the curb, but
the city boulevard is 13.5 feet to the property line. The Andover
Review Committee has recommended the structures be removed. The builder
of the house had given his word that the pillars would be removed within
two weeks of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. That was not
done.
Todd Amar, 1469 140th Lane NW - stated he was not notified that the City
had an agreement with his builder. He never knew there was a problem
until he received the letter from the City. Those pillars were in the
original building plans. He had pictures of his pillars plus many other
monuments located on boulevards within the City of Andover. By
definition, the ordinance requires no trees, rocks, etc., in the right
of way; but in driving around the City, there are numerous violations.
'\
,~/
L
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Allqll!';-r 17. 1 q'n
AGENDA SECTION
NO Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
f\O.
Review CO~
BY:
Appeal Ord. 95/149th &
Bluebird Street
D.L. Almgren
7.
The city Council is requested to consider the appeal of Robert
and Renee Bannister to allow a brick mailbox structure to remain
in the city right-of-way at 14971 Bluebird Street N.W.
The Andover Review Committee met and the Committee finding was
that the mailbox structure needs to be removed.
Ordinance 95 allows the property owner to appeal to the City
Council and Council shall have the authority to affirm, amend or
') reject the decision of the Review Commi ttee. '
('-.I
MOTION BY:
1'-)
TO:
.r"'.~"1J..~~ .
,~. t' \III\I\t'~llli'
;: IH'JlilllllH'11I III Trilll:-;llllllilli()1\
, <(
..
_ ~ _ BOll 718
~ ,-~....4 a'O~Att.S~O"TATION ROAO
OF ~_) WI~~MA". MINNesoTA ~ '
21.1/4" typo
.1
'1"
cir-
>'
- .
. I
;..,
po
--
, ,
, ~i
..
-; e I
Q -.
~Q
.. -
...=
U at
0= 'ii
:G.=
u _
.. ..
::l ~
Q Q
>-
~
~ co
<-=
(~) Four 4d nails
~
--f3)1/4" dia. x 4"'W.
7' ...., law bolts & nuts I .
G)Three 16d nails If
1.112" thick
wood tiller
(2) 2 x 4 or 2 x 6
5' g"l;. .. .
c
.. ..
..~
::l _
a:::l
. .
N=
..,..,
. .
=i:n
M..,
About J' to 4' arm is desirable
Item No. Description
~ Required
1 1 1.112" thicK wood tiller
.-...-- ..-
.!:Y2" x..8:~.2~" ty~.
~ 1 5' 9" Ig. 2 x <4 ~ 2 x 6 nom. lumber ..
. -.....--- - -
3 2 1/~~' ~i~~ 4'~~;._law ~l.u .!I.nuts
- '.
4 2 2'6" Ig. 1 x 6 nom. lumoer
. . --. .
5' 1 S' 0" ~g. 4 x 4 sq. past or 6" dia. round post ·
-6 . ----,-
4~ ~alva~iz,ed nai!~,a_~,n~~~
-- ..
7 l6d galvanized nails as needed.
\I "iatJl
· Oirel, $'
'0".
@<4 lC" sq. past
or 6" di....
round wood post!
. I
. -
Q . ..
C. I,~
~I'"
<:::>
-
c
CD
, ')
'-'
Outside edge of shoulder
LIST OF MATERIALS
.
c
N~
~
\....)
· Length may vary according to ditch slope
.. For 4 ft. arm
.' '
RECOMMENDED MAIL BOX SUPPORT
(WOOD POST)
~(" "~.~' ' .~
; . . ~
.. <l:'
~.,. ".f
,. 0.: T~P.~
~~
.\ it. ii i, . :,. 'H'
llq I, Hlllll'llI 01 '1"1 i 1I1S1 )C IIIClli< Hl
1I0X 18e
;Z,O, TAAH'..OATAT10H AOAO
WILLI4A", I4IHHItSOT A S8l01
J.
21.1/.... typo
'1
..,~A
J
~i
. I
;"1
~~
I )(
i .8
I :;
~j;~!
:::I "Ii 0
a: ::) I ..
. . .a;-a.
N Co : ,- .-
~~I tj!
. ....
, U ..
~~: ~ 8-
M~' 00
1>- ..
I~ ~
!o( ~
'-.-)
,9
'~'O
11
~oriJ/ S/2~" IIi.. hole
. f~,1I4 di... lag bolts
-- '
o 0 '
CDl.1/2" thick
wood fill.r
2 1/4" dia. x 4.1/2"1g.
lag bolts and nuts
SECT. A.A
~
@3' 0"1;. 1.1/4" .
nominal stnl pipe ..
0" 0" Ig. 1" pipe sleeve..; .
@ Two 6.' Ig. 1.1/4" nomina'
stHI pipes. Cut pipes and
sleeve as n.cessary to adjust
height. .
About J' to 4' um il desirable
~A
OUUid. edge of shoulder
v<< .
"'<161.
.0'
Irch
Slo~
LIST OF MATERIALS
o.
Description
~lJiI
1
.-
'.,1/2" th.ick wood filler
1.1/2" x 8" l( 20" typo
2 1/4" die. x 4.1/2"1;. 1<19 bolts & nuts
2 450 Ell for 1.1/4" nominal steel pip.
.. _...__.. .. 0-0 _.. _ . .... .._ . ..
, 14' 0" Ig: 1.:Y_'!"' nominal. steel Eip~ :. .
1_ll.1!4" to 2" !~~~ing couplinj
1 11' 0" Ig. 2" nominal stnl ip..
. .. .....
1 ISack of premix concr.te
; 13.0" 19: 1.1/4;' -"-;~i'~I"eel pipe"
. ~. 19" Ig. 1" ~~m inal st:!!..I!!~' _ ,_ :', _
2 6.. Ig. 1.1/4" nominal steel pipe ,
.--
2 1.1/4" tail pipe ciampI
TA.LPIPE CLAMP
Clamp Ivailable wh.r.
automobile tailpipe
finings are sold
450 Ell for
1.1/4" nomina'
steel pipe
(Welded connection
illn Iltlfnat.1
"0
..
~
-; ; -{!) 1.1/4" nominal
.~ I 5tH' Pipe ,
~O'
~I
~ I ~ '.114.' to 2"
I Reduci~
" J Coupl.. .
l' 0" I;. 2"
namin.1
,teel pipe
, ,..:'
.'. y.
.
o
: .:..
/~:,' :":'::=t
.. .-
. ..'. ',. ,,'.. .
bJ +1
l' 0" + :
- M
Sq. or Rd.
Set post in
caner eta
...
. 4' typo for 48" .bove roadway shoulder
length m.y w.ry ICcordinll to ditch slope
.. For 4 ft. arm
RECOMMENDED MAIL BOX
(STEEL POST)
SUPPORT
\.
)
'\
'-J
\ j
---
\.-,.
~,
~,""''''''''
.,.
"":" ,1 ~ ""
"
;C;~J'~:l ;~
l r.:-'
"
, ,
, 1
- - -
..,
'I') 1 _r,; ~ ('I,
:"' ~ -Q200
":'?~-G;Cr)
88~-~3:"
'1'1":-
1'):1
1:~-q;0C
'1'"'7_1""\""':;"
()n-_p0~~
''''
''''''
i ,..... n., (." ""I
c _..~ t- .: :;:~.;
L,
,,. /~
:-(_'l ;'~ t:':1 : :.
" (~
~~;: 2. ~::-
',;en't
:"-:::) 1
'~ (;
rcdc;
,r_
,..~ I-p C0~:2
.I:.::
, ,
,. ~ ro ~
,-. ~ .1 _,
LC'~,~,,~ ::
..., -....
,..'.'- .
'..I. .,... ~, ..." 1
"......,-:.
""-.
.-'" ". ~
"
l' nn....
J-l.......
<'-
_. ~ -L. ..
!' L: l
'"
, )
t2)'~ >
..,',','
'.:<.
"
, )
.--....
I~ :
'~
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 4
(Assessment Reduction/R. Sonsteby, Continued)
justification for assessing her lots more, especially since she was told
by the City Clerk that her lots were considered a part of the Meadows of
Round Lake. The City is saying the Nedegaard lots were only 80 feet and
hers are 100 feet; but she argued that some of the Nedegaard lots were
also 90 feet and they were only assessed $1,600 each. She also felt
discriminated against when in 1981 she was required to pay the
equivalent of a 100-foot lot for a lot that had only 32 feet of
frontage. One other lot had only 15 feet of frontage, but that owner
only paid for the actual frontage. Ms. Sonsteby also alleged that in
1984, she, as the developer, paid for everything in Rosella's Addition,
even for the sewer, water, blacktop and curbing that benefitted another
parcel. Ms. Sonsteby again argued that the Nedegaard contract indicates
he is to pay for all extensions. Since she was told her lots are a part
of that development, and there are no Resolutions specifically about her
lots, she felt her lots should be assessed the same.
Mr. Haas explained the trunk runs past Ms. Sonsteby's lot, but she is
only being assessed a lateral charge per the City's policy. Ms.
Sonsteby came into the process after the petition for the Meadows of
Round Lake and the signing of the Development Contract. Ms. Sonsteby is
being assessed $22/front foot per the City's policy. Mayor McKelvey
believed the contract between Ms. Sonsteby and the developers of the
Meadows of Round Lake is that they would pay the lateral charge for Ms.
Sonsteby. He felt that is a private legal agreement that does not
involve the City.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that the City Council deny the
request of Rosella Sonsteby for a reduction in assessments for lateral
service to three of her lots which she is developing. The assessments
are currently $2,200 per lot and the Council reconfirms that amount.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Dalien) vote.
00 APPEAL ORDINANCE 95/149TH AND BLUEBIRD
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the appeal of Robert and Renee Bannister to allow
a brick mailbox structure to remain in the city right of way at 14971
Bluebird Street NW. The Andover Review Committee found the mailbox
structure, while aesthetically appealing and does eliminate vandalism to
a degree, does not meet ordinance nor postal requirements and must be
removed. The ordinance requirement was enacted in 1991, and the
Building Official found the violation and submitted a letter to the
owners. He had photographs of the structure.
"
,--)
( -
'---"
In Council discussion, Mr. Carlberg stated the purpose of the ordinance
is a safety factor for Public Works employees who might accidentally hit
the solid structure, and it becomes a snow maintenance problem. The
postal regulation is the box must be back from the curb. There are many
such mailboxes around the City, so he predicted many more appeals coming
before the Council on this issue. Councilmember Perry agreed that the
mailboxes are much more appealing, but felt such structures in the right
of way are a problem and should be removed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5. 1993
AGENDA
fIO.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Discussion
Planning ~
BY:
ITEM
f\O.
Appeal Ord. No. 95
14971 Bluebird Street
Brick Mailbox
R. & R. Bannister
NW
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~,
The City Council tabled this item on August 17, 1993 pending
Planning and zoning Commission review and a recommendation to
Council on regulating encroachments. The Council should base the
decision on the findings of the previous item on tonights agenda.
staff has included the packet materials from'the August 17, 1993
meeting for background information on the request.
'\
'- )
. MOTION BY:
)
SECOND BY:
TO:
~-)
')
'-~/
\ 1
..../
"
:;I.t 1:.
n=
1303
'C :1"': i d 1.1 ::lg :..._~: r~
B l~ ,i 1 d :. n ~ C f f' i ~ a :.
lr,83 "":"'::':;s~of.;n BC:i-:.2.....:\:-d ~:.~':.
\Ld~)' .?l':
:1 ~~ .
~="'''t
'J OJ ,."J .:
,,":,:(::;1 :'
\ f ~..
.,..
\l.r:;;....:~J
r' .: .4-....
. - '-.;
~.-......(""..: ,
"_ _'. 4....~ 4_
". ,...,.-('
_ 44:) .
TL~:.::':-:) ::"
:'':':::8S to :i~~d
:.1~d :1C~Cr.::- '-:,:?";
....,~
V L ~....
:~Oh-
~'i"e
1... ,_ .&- 1-.
.... ,~. '- ..
:. ::-:.':1,-1
se....eI:".':'..~
'fo"""l'-'+-
...'_..... ...
or:
T.... _.
'.: ...
nn
l:)~::
~'.~ (l s t : .1. :.
f "~('l
- .'
-:~~e:"'~
n' .;~'!) ~ :"'::!
~t~"!::~'!"i::':'
t!1;:~ t
1 I "-"f
i.).' ""
'1'.':".;:..
........., 1
. ~ '.' ....
!.: :~" J,...
,
;lC'
'-;1.:\('::.'!:
. \ _"~ '... .4 .....
",:._'l .
~ t. .. '-
. ~ ~~~~.::~ :.~ i.
'"
1". .:
~ '.~ '.. "
I. :.....c.. ~
L ::2
::. :':::2
I' .-
..:
;';: :,:::1;:; c'
1 ~ ~-2a3G.
7' 10";_ :-~:~ - :-.:- It .
-za:~ :G-
'(&.~ ~\.A
::: ) :,>::. :
~2::~C:.' ::'::I.:1;-li3~2:'"
:tJ71 3!.:.:.:b.:..:....-l S!:.:.-eet. ~:.~':.
~.!':;::'.J"\. '"?' __~ J
'.f....
. .. ~ .
::~.,'"
.J .... ,'/'J--:
:\',2
.,.........
...... '.
"'~
,"
:~
iJ.?
~~c:~2d
~ ~~e
Y"':::::.u....
... '- ~\, ....
~ ,
~~1....th:.:-:; 'l:-:-t:.~ ,.. ::t':~~e,l
':~::-:; ~:::..s ~:'::':':".
:"?.'13 ') ~1
..
'. .J
:.... '7 7;.;:' ~'.-=r.
.. ~ ......
-,"
.'... .
~"
:"011
....,1.-:3
',. ..'-
~J:-ic:~\:
.......,,:, h.......
.:.-.....-............
~ ..... ~
n':~;:~ r::.~"': ':',:;..1~~:2. \!0':'~:.:i;'S
\:::.~.')~:.2:.. ?c.\.:..~~,; :"..:::::::.:..: ~ '_~'~' J
7: ;:2
'1:::!
G.~. ~ :
"
- "
the
..,.~ ,=> ~
.l~.. _ '_ _ ._~
" '
.. T.. _.~ ;.
.......'.......-
.. ')
!'-./
,,~I
\
I
_I
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
August 4, 1993
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Bannister
14971 Bluebird Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bannister:
pursuant to your request, the issue of your brick mailbox
structure will be addressed at the August 17th city Council
meeting. The meeting begins at 7:30 P.M. at the Andover City
Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N'. W.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or
David Almgren at 755-5100.
"
Sincerely,
~h
Victoria volk
City Clerk
"
"
~ )
:'0}
\ ..i'\,
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
"
"
June 21, 1993
Robert & Renee Bannister
14971 Bluebird street NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bannister:
We, the Andover Review Committee (ARC), have reviewed your appeal
and request to vary from the provisions of Ordinance No. 95,
Section 4a in regard to the placement of a brick mailbox on your
property located at 14971 Bluebird Street NW. The ARC has met and
finds the following:
1. The Committee agrees the asthetics of the structure are
appealing.
2. The Committee agrees that it does intend to eliminate
vandalism.
; '--___.J
3. However, per the post office regulations it does not meet
their intended requirement for a post holding a mailbox for height
requirements (42 to 48 inches to the bottom of the box) and
setback requirements (8 to 10 inches setback from curb). The post
is to be installed in such a fashion as to facilitate the removal
of snow by the post/box position.
4. The Committee finds that the structure constitutes an
immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare of the
residents of Andover due to the type of material and location.
5. The Committee finds the structure interferes with the
maintenance of the street, especially snow plowing and creates a
hazard to the Public Works Department.
6. Note: Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.27, Particular Uses of
Right-of-Way; Misdemeanors, Subd. 5. MiSdemeanors, prohibits the
the placing or maintaining of any building or structure within the
limit of any highway.
Therefore, in revie~ing the appeal of the order of the Building
Official to remove the structure (mailbox), it is the Committee's
recommendation that the structure be removed.
\
,_/
SV~~
,Dav'id Almgren ~
Building Official
'-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
rn
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Discussion
ITEM
f\O.
Planning
~
BY:
Appeal Ord. No. 95
1469 140th Lane NW
Brick Lanterns
Todd & Glenda Amar
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
?
The City Council tabled this item on August 17, 1993 pending
Planning and Zoning Commission review and a recommendation to
Council on regulating encroachments. The Council should base the
decision on the findings of the previous item on tonights agenda.
Staff has included the packet materials from the August 17, 1993
meeting for background information on the request.
- )
~
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
"
TO:
,
( . .",
" .( \
- '-'"'
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 5
(Appeal Ordinance 95/149th and Bluebird, Continued)
About five or six residents addressed the Council arguing there are
many, many mailboxes in the City that do not meet the ordinance
requirements. Those in Kensington Estates are 6x6 posts, not 4x4 as the
ordinance requires. Such mailboxes are very common in many of the
cities with higher-priced houses such as Eden Prairie, Bloomington,
Edina. They asked why is ita danger in one community and not in
others. Mrs. Bannister stated they are willing to move it back off the
curb and mark it with flags and reflectors. This looks nice, as opposed
to those who have various tubes and vandalized mailboxes. Mr.
Bannister stated he would be willing to tear it down and start over to
set the mailbox out on a post. He could submit a drawing that would
have to be approved by the City. Another resident stated the ordinance
was passed in 1991, but his mailbox structure has been up since 1989.
He felt he should be grandfathered, but he received a letter today
indicating a violation.
".
... / "
'-',"--'
Council discussed again noted that such mailboxes are aesthetically
pleasing but are a safety concern. They acknowledged that Staff was,
appropriate in following procedure, but also felt that possibly the
Planning and Zoning Commission should look at the requirement again, see
what other cities are doing, decide whether or not the current ordinance
is still practical, and make a recommendation.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, to send the issue to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for further consideration of review of
the Ordinance for mailboxes only. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 1-Absent
(Dalien) vote.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, to table the appeal request until
the first meeting in October. (October 5, 1993) Motion carried on a 4-
Yes, I-Absent (Dalien) vote:
"""')
& APPEAL/ORDINANCE 95/AMAR/1469 140TH LAlIE NW
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the appeal request of Todd and Glenda Amar to
allow two brick lantern pillars to remain in the city right of way at
1469 140th Lane NW. They are located eight feet behind the curb, but
the city boulevard is 13.5 feet to the property line. The An~over
Review Committee has recommended the structures be removed. The bu~lder
of the house had given his word that the pillars would be removed within
two weeks of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. That was not
done.
'\
\_j
'--'
Todd Amar, 1469 140th Lane NW - stated he was not notified that the City
had an agreement with his builder. He never knew there was a problem
until he received the letter from the City. Those pillars were in the
original building plans. He had pictures of his pillars plus many other
monuments located on boulevards within the City of Andover. By
definition, the ordinance requires no trees, rocks, etc., in the right
of way; but in driving around the City, there are numerous violations.
:. )
(::.,1
~
I )
\ - ',~.
'-./
~'
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 17, 1993
Page 6
(Appeal Ordinance 95/Amar/1469 140th Lane NW, Continued)
Is the City going to require all trees and other items to be removed as
well? He felt this issue is the same as the previous one dealing with
mailbox structures and asked that the ordinance be reviewed. Attorney
Hawkins advised that the ordinance applies to structures placed in the
boulevards subsequent to the adoption of this ordinance. Mr. Carlberg
stated the existing trees in the right of way would be a nonconforming
issue. The boulevards are for the purpose of installing utility lines
and to leave it clear for future maintenance
Mr. Amar - was willing to live with the possibility that the pillars may
have to be removed if maintenance is required in that area. He accepts
that ris~. The pillars are an aesthetic improvement to the property,
but it would not work to move them back to the property line. He again
argued there are such monuments allover the place both within Andover
and in other cities.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, that the Andover City Council
deny the appeal of Todd and Glenda Amar for the property located at 1469
140th Lane NW to allow the ,brick pillars to remain in the city right of
way. The reason for denial is it is not consistent with Ordinance No.
9S; and while the City Council has determined there may be a need to
address the ordinance as it relates to mailboxes, the City Council has,
not directed the review of the ordinance for other structures in the
right of way. DISCUSSION: Attorney Hawkins thought that the Minnesota
Statutes 160.27 states it is unlawful to place or maintain any structure
within the limits of any highway, which applies to state, county and
municipal streets. He did feel there is some provision that authorizes
cities to have certain encroachments that wouldn't be a violation. The
City does have the ordinance regulating this.
Mr. Amar - asked that this item be given the same review as the mailbox
issue just previously discussed. These types of monuments are becoming
common in landscaping, plus there are other types of landscapes within
right of ways. Avery, very large portion of Andover residents are
affected by this issue. Councilmember Knight felt that given the
possible magnitude of the problem, that the Planning and Zoning
Commission should address this issue swell.
VOTE ON MOTION: Yes-Jacobson, Perry; NO-McKelvey, Knight; Absent-
Dalien. Motion failed.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Knight, that this also be referred to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for review at their September 14 meeting
and again reiterate the fact that Staff and the Andover Review committee
have acted properly in their recommendations. Motion carried on a 3-
Yes, 1-No (Jacobson), 1-Absent (Dalien) vote.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Knight, that we table Agenda Item No.8,
Appeal/Ordinance 9S/Amar/1469 140th Lane NW pending recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent
(Dalien) vote.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 17, 1993
AGENDA
t-O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Discussion Items
ITEM
t-O.
Review comm~ ~
~ BY:
1.
Appeal Ord. 95/1469 -
140th Lane NW.
D.L. Almgren
The city Council is requested to consider the appeal of Todd and
Glenda Amar to allow two brick lantern pillars to remain in the
city right-of-way at 1469 - 140th Lane N.W.
The Andover Review Committee met on July 27, 1993 and the
Committee finding was that the pillars nee~ to be removed.
Ordinance 95 allows the property owner to appeal to the City
Council and Council shall have the authority to affirm, amend or
\ reject the decision of the Review Commi ttee.'
('_/
'\..
,
MOTION BY:
'\
)
TO:
"
"
Y1. ..
'\
- /
,',
July 27, ~993
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
.'
Todd and Glenda Amar
1469 140th Lane NW
Andover MN 55304
Dear Mr. & Mrs Amar:
The Andover Review Committee met on July 27, 1993 to review
your appeal of not moving the two brick lantern pillars from
the City Right-of-Way onto your property. As was noted in a
letter dated May 25, 1993 to you it was stated to your builder
(Mr. Paulson) that the pillars were in the city right-of-way
and would have to be moved. He said he was under the gun to get
this house closed and gave us his ~ that he would have them
moved within two weeks.
"
,
\.--/.
The finding of the Andover Review Committee was that the pillars
will have to be moved off of the city right-of-way onto your property.
1. City Ordinance i95 does not allow structures of such in
road right-of-way.
2. It was the promise of your building contractor to move the
pillars within two weeks of issuance of certificate of
occupancy.
3. Minnesota statutes 160.27 subd 5 (7) it shall be unlawful
to place or maintain any structure within the limits of any
highway.
Sincerely,
04~
David Almgren
Building Official
DA/jp
\
" j
)
,
I
'_I
,
\ )
"
735 P'I.ORIOA AVENUE. 5;OUTH
GOLDEN VALL.EY, MN 55428
(<<1'2) .'54'.0'.. "".. ~1-0.7.
~UGUST 05, 1993,
,.'
Dave Almgren
CITY, OF 'ANDOVER
'1685' Crosstown Blvd., N. W'.
AndoVer; MN~S~04
". .-
Dear~Dave;
, .
'In regards' to your letter dated JUlY2,7th, i993, declining my
request for a'variance regarding the location of my driveway.
pillars,' I would like ~o request that this matter appear '
, . before '. the city 'col,lncil f 01; C!Ppe~l.' ' ,
, 'I'und~r~tand~thatthis is my 'tight ~nd~r city ordina~ce
'~No.95. . ' .' ,
"
Please notify me: of the, 'date, time and locati<:in of' the
.'meeting. " ',"
Sincerely,
~/~
" Todd R. Amar
,
'.
'.
"
.'
"
'.
'.
.
'.
"
)
\.,,-~I
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. · ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
August 9, 1993
Mr. & Mrs. Todd Amar
1469 - 140th Lane N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Amar:
\
'-)
Pursuant to your request, the issue of your two brick
lantern pillars will be addressed at the August 17th City Council
meeting. The meeting begins at 7:30 P.M. at the Andover City
Hall, 1685 crossto~n Boulevard N.W.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or
David Almgren at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
~ t-/L
Victoria Volk
City Clerk
. '\
<)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 5, 1993
DATE
AGENDA
/10.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
staff, Committees, Commissions
1\dministration
ITEM
NJ.
City Hall Expansion Discussion
,~/ BVW
paryl E. sulander2!1 .
~cting City Administrato ~
g.
DISCUSSION
The last expansion project in 1987-88 cost $55,000.00 and added
1364 square feet of office and meeting space to house the Building
and Planning Departments, and half of the Engineering Department.
The city Council approved reserving $50,000 of the 1993 Building
Permit Revenue for building improvements earlier this year.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend the City Council:
1) Initiate a City Hall e7.pansion project using the building
improvement reserve as the initial funding source, and
2) Direct the Acting Administrator to coordinate a spacial needs
analysis study, and
3) Prepare cost projections for expanding City Hall.
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
'--
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t-O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
t-O.
Admin.
BY:
Declare Cost/Order
Assessment Roll/92-20/
Woodland Creek 3rd
V. Volk
q.
The City Council is requested to declare the costs and order the
assessment roll for project 92-20, Woodland Creek 3rd Addition.
Attached is the necessary resolution for adoption.
V:Attach.
,
~
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
"'-
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
, \
<)
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STREETS AND
STORM SEWER , FOR PROJECT NO. 92-20 WOODLAND CREEK 3RD
ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$262,140.08, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 92,717.90 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 354,857.98
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 8,498.23 the amount to be assessed
against benefited property owners is declared to be $346,359.75
2.
Assessment shall be payable in semi-annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the 15th day of April 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of th~ assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the prcper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection.
\
, )
~
,
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October , 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
none
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
" )
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\, -'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE 9HBIlu S, 199J
AGENDA
t-D.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
t-D.
Admin.
BY:
Adopt Assessment Roll/
92-20/Woodland Creek 3rd
V. Volk
/tJ.
The City Council is requested to adopt the assessment roll for
Woodland Creek 3rd Addition.
The developer, Woodland Development, has waived their right to an
assessment hearing.
A copy of the assessment roll is in my office for your review.
Attached is the necessary resolution and a copy of the
developer's letter.
"
\ MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
'-
TO:
-09/29/93 -10: IS--a612,.-42TOI92
WOODLAND-DEVELOP
141 00 1
~,)
SeptaIber 28, 1993
Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 N. W. Crosstown Boulevard
.Andover, M-l 55304
Dear Todd,
This letter is in regard to the letter frcm'lKDA, dated September 22, 1993,
frcm Tcm Syfko. We agree with the cost of our project and ask that the
Public Hearing be waiv:ed and the assessments be placed against the project.
If you need any other infot:mation, please feel free to contact me at
427-7500.
,
) Sincerely,
~/J~
Byron D. Westlund
Vice President
BDW:jah
Co.
I
Post.lt'" brand fax transmillal memo 7
To .-r- From
co.
:, )
Oep!.
Phone ~
~.). 1- .,~O
r.. ~
Fax,
830 West Main Street Anoka. Minnesota 55303 (612) 427-7500 FAX: (612) 427-0192
, )
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND STREETS, PROJECT NO.
92-20 WOODLAND CREEK 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owner and developer of the above mentioned
property agree with the proposed assessments and waive the public
hearing and waive their right to appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall
constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found
to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
'-)
2. Such assessment shall be payable in semi-annual
installments, together with principal and accrued interest,
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April,
19 94 and shall bear interest at a rate of 5.5 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution.
3. The owners of any property so assessed may at any time
pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest
accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
meeting thi s
5th
day
of
October
19 93 with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution,
and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
, '.
" )
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
,.. ,
L
AGENDA
t-O.
ITEM
t-O.
II.
'~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5, 1993
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Admin.
Declare Cost/Order Asesss-
ment Roll/92-24/Andover Blvd.
V. Volk
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
BY:
The City Council is requested to declare the costs and order the
assessment roll for Project 92-24, Andover Boulevard.
Attached is the necessary resolution.
V:Attach.
,~
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
TO:
,/_)
o
C)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANDOVER BOULEVARD NW
, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-24 SANITARY SEWER,
WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAIN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 319,381.63 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 113,903.76 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 433,285.39.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 249,628.39 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefIted property owners is declared to
be $ Y3,874.18.
2.
Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period oflO years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
,r- .
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
tn.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
tn.
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Rolli
Order Hearing/92-241
Andover Boulevard
V. Volk
I~.
The City Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 92-24, Andover Boulevard, sanitary
sewer, watermain and storm sewer.
The hearing is scheduled for October 19th at 7:50 p.m.
Attached is the resolution ordering the hearing.
V:Attach.
',-
/'
\
--
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
C_)
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 92-24
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 5 ,
19 93 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for project No. 92-24; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 19th day of October , in the
City Hall at 7:50 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
/ ,the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
~~)given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 5th day of
October
, 19~,
with Councilmember
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmember
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
(-)ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/---,
DATE October 5, 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
....._-~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
Admin.
Declare Cost/Order Asesss-
ment Roll/92-18/Jay street NW
V. Volk
IS.
BY:
The City Council is requested to declare the costs and order the
assessment roll for Project 92-18, Jay street.
Attached is the necessary resolution.
V:Attach.
\
.
,--J
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
\.
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
:,)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND
STORM DRAIN, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-18 JAY STREET NW
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 111,645.98 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 41,101.90 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 152,747.88.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 152,747.88.
2.
Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of Ie years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affe~ted, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
'--,
'-/
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
,~=)
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
( ,
\../
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5, 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Rolli
Order Hearing/92-181
Jay Street
V. Volk
pi
The City Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 92-18, Jay Street.
The hearing is scheduled for October 19th at 8:30 p.m.
Attached is the resolution ordering the hearing.
V:Attach.
"-
r \ MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
'-
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
;'-.) MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 92-18
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 5 ,
19 93 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 92-18; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 2nd day of November , in the
City Hall at 8:15 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not iess
-\ than two weeks prior to the hearings.
'-) ,
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 5th day of
October
, 19-2.i,
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~.~ ATTEST:
'. )
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victorla Volk - Clty Clerk
~/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
AGENDA
1\0.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
1\0.
Admin.
BY:
Declare Cost/Order Asesss-
ment Roll/92-29/Echo Woods
V. Volk
/5.
The City Council is requested to declare the costs and order the
assessment roll for Project 92-29, Echo Woods.
Attached is the necessary resolution.
V:Attach.
\.-
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
\ I
TO:
<)
. \ 2.
,_I
"
'J
ATTEST:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. N').
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND
STORM DRAIN, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-29 ECHO WOODS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 243,247.83 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 89,550.45 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 332,798.27.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 332,798.27.
3.
Assessment shall be payable in semi-annual installments extending
over a period of/8 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the 15th day in April 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
4.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t\O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
1'0.
Admin.
BY:
Declare Cost/Order Assessment
Rol189-18/Storm Sewer
\ ~
V. Volk~,
/~.
The City Council is requested to declare the costs and order the
assessment roll for Project 89-18, storm sewer. This project was
ordered in 1989 but the hearing for the assessment has not been
held at this point.
Attached is the necessary resolution.
~
V:Attach.
, MOTION BY:
\. I
SECOND BY:
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
C_)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STORM SEWER TRUNK AND LATERAL
, FOR PROJECT NO. 89-18 SE PART OF WATT'S
GARDEN ACRES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, the work has previously been done and a a contract has
been entered into with the City of Coon Rapids for the construction of
the improvements so that the total cost of the improvement will be
$ 39,832.93.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 39,832.93.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of/6 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of , 5.5 percent per annum from the
, \ date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
\ J
-~
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
, '
"-.--)
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - Citv Clerk
.- -
CITY OF ANDOVER
~~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t-O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
t-O.
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Rolli
Order Hearing/89-181
storm Sewer
V. Volk
I?
The city Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 89-18, storm Sewer.
The hearing is scheduled for October 19th at 8:10 p.m.
Attached is the resolution ordering the hearing.
V:Attach.
,.
~) MOTION BY:
TO:
SECOND BY:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
C) MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
~ROJECT NO. 89-18
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 5 ,
19 93 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 89-18; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 2nd day of November , in the
City Hall at 8:05 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
,') than two weeks prior to the hearings.
'- 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 5th day of
October
, 19~,
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
,-,
, I
",J
J. E. MCKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/ '
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t\O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
t\O.
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Roll/
Order Hearing/92-30/1805
Andover Boulevard
V. Volk ~~.
o
LX.
The City Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 92-30, sanitary sewer and watermain
for 1805 Andover Boulevard.
We have scheduled the hearing for October 19th at 7:35 p.m.
Attached is a copy of the assessment roll and the necessary
resolution.
V:Attach.
'-
MOTION BY:
'- ,I
SECOND BY:
TO:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
c' "
, I
,--,'
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 92-30
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 21 ,
1993 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 92-30; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 19th day of October, 1993 , in the
City Hall at 7:35 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
. \the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
, ,given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
'- than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmember
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmember
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
'.
\. JATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~)
\
'-.)
...~
" "
"~
" " .
"" '"_l.I_'"
--.....
. . .
. - 0
....
~ g ~ --~~- ~-;
l.I W lot W lot W w l:il,; w~ N
c)Ot""'fJI"~_O__'!........i!'
P\> tfN~t:-",
_~_~_~t.I !,_.IoI__N
2
o
....
III
~,. ." -l'-' c:.
-:"_0. III 01_"
.... ~~
02
........
DfT1
r "'(1
Ill",
(I)
....
:s
<1"
~
rD
1I1
<1"
."
o
,
~~(~
o vJ(f'l1,J)
~r
~ rO~J ~
Illlll uJ
u) -...j Ij UI
~~[
..:-" .......
~ f\lro I,J)
CD ru (l"l I,J)
u)-(D(rl
~ ~[t.~
.:- ..,...
~ .....(.J(jJ
Illt~WuJ
~ :--,~-...j
t'1 ro (oJ
:I
~
1O
1O
W
III
-J
-J
-J
~,
IJl
~,
:s
n
~
"
a.
m
a.
~,
:s
1O
1O
...
~,
:s
<1"
~
rD
IJl
<1"
.t- ~u)
(ll-..J~IJ)
tD-....J.....C:O
~~[ltJ
-J~,
.. .. ... -f
U1~i:.JO
U1-JIll....
u) In l.J D
. , . r
(,oJl.J]' (f.l
-J-J
Ie:; ~ ~j :-1 -J;~ I.'> ~ ~ ~.~'tt.~ ~_:~ '.~_~~(l:~_:t~.~_~~_~__t.J_~~_~. ~ t e:-."~:~ ~ ":.~ ~~ ~ ~ ..!o: (j'~'~',
. . '~ ':~'I~I' ;
D C fTlm~ I
~ ~ ill'
rn r ~ .
(I)
III
t:l
D
3:
o
C
2
....
Y'
W
III
W
...
o
mro
P)ro I
00
00
. .
00
00
e:
2(1)
~D
....~
n(l)
:elll
D>:
)Jill
Gl)J
III
mp)
1O1O
rl)[l)
t~ UI
00
(I)
D
D2
)J'
m(l)
Dm
>:
m
)J
fl.'! ro
(T>(T>
~~
t~ UI
00
(I)
n~1
0'1
211l
zml
. >:'
m
)J
I
I >:
m l"l) in)) r
foro I J:-11
ggl~~1
. . I Gl ,
00 me:
00 Z
~
....
I
[g[gi DB
(Tl(tl'-;:C-l
, , I Illm
-t-.p. D::O
00 I
~~
-..... 01:
r,) fl,,"1 0 D I
~n~'12rril
Co 0 I . )J'
00
-----..,
"
III "
flit,)
P'
~ re.'!
n<l:'-
H
m (.J
, b
WO
00
~r
'I
a.!
I
I
I
I
(I)'IJ
m tS
'IJ()
0:+0:.;...
m m
3 n
crt"
m'
, 1O
~) if
-JW
. 0
~
1O
uJ
[oj
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5, 1993
AGENDA
r-o.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
1\K).
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Roll/
Order Hearing/93-15/Lot 11,
Block 7, Boundary Comm. Plat
\ ~.
V. Volk U
/9.
The City Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 93-15/watermain for Lot 11, Block
7, Andover Boundary Commission Plat 1.
We have scheduled the hearing for October 19th at 7:40 p.m.
Attached is a copy of the assessment roll and the necessary
resolution.
1
'-.J
V:Attach.
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
\.-
TO:
,
-
- - ';;
" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~
. '- " _J" .~-()-- . -~- . . --' " "'--- 0 ~~ . . .
,
I
I
I
,
I
, I I
I
I
,
I I - -
, " . " .;.... " " .... " '. '. . ,. 'I' " " ; . .
. .
~
"
'-./
"
',--/
"
....--/
~' n ""1' d'
m g ~
Vl'o
..
~
....
Z
-1
rrJ
:0
rrJ
m
-1
'Tl
o
:0
~
<ll
oJ
"
'"
l~
'"
....
m
....
z
n
r
C
"
rrJ
"
....
Z
....
<ll
<ll
...
....
Z
-1
rrJ
;0
rrJ
m
-1
"'
. C>.....: ,. ':... ~ .
I
.t~,~~~,~.~~':~'~~~~~ .~~
.:-
~
....
~
~~:: ~
o to
;" b
t: r
0... '"
t... f' ~
> r. r
ll> III
~: ~
No r
~ ~ ~'"
1"0
tlJ ....
r.... [
~~ ~
!.rill> b
trl n) I,)
I .
I _~
Ol...
rL' "'-J
L~ Ol
. ,
~g
I
I
....
ll>
.:-
o
...
'"
,-,
'"
.:-
o
...
'"
,,'
'"
.:-
o
...
'"
",
'"
.:-
o
...
'"
("
'"
t~
VI
o
("
'"
'"
, tI~I".r~T~~lJ-;U
D3 lO3 OIOM
-iO (fJ1J t;lO-lZ
DC,rrJ:!l n
r~ g;~ lP': f2 I
D DrrJ
U1 tt'l3 ......W
(J) rrn D -1\"1 1
rrJ rrJZ Z
m -l t:' I rl)
m CO...
rrJ Z <
t::I ..... rn (.J
-1 ;0 ....
D
3: "" 0
000
C C '"
Z Z...
~ -1 t:l
<ll' D
<il ;0
... -<
n
o
3:
~I
~I
ZI
'lJ
r
D
-1
<ll
<il
t~
I
.J:-.J:-b ~
... .... D
';".f'*, -I
"'''''''' rrJ
(DCDCO.....;:u
, . b' 3:
00 OD
00 0_
Z
....
'0
'"'
'"
....
'"'
<il
'"
m'lJ
rrJ:o
'00
-1,-<
rrJ
n) n
;-J -1 I
<ll
.... (.J
<lll
<ll....
," UI
....
'"'
'"'
ll>
-1
o
<+
!ll
~
III
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 93-15
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 21 ,
1993 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 93-15; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 19th day of October, 1993 , in the
City Hall at 7:40 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
, )given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
~ than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmember
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmember
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
. ,
, i
',j ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
r-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
r-o.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
r-o.
Admin.
BY:
Receive Assessment Roll/
Order Hearing/93-19/Lots 8 &
9, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addn.
,\ 0'
V. Volk \),
~o.
The City Council is requested to receive the assessment roll and
order the hearing for Project 93-19/watermain for Lots 8 & 9,
Red Oa'ks Manor 4th Addition.
We have scheduled the hearing for October 19th at 7:45 p.m.
Attached is a copy of the assessment roll and the necessary
resolution.
V:Attach.
'--
I
\
MOTION BY:
i
SECOND BY:
TO:
~~ (II
~....!:'!
(II III ... (II (II '"
"'_!.I_'" ...:"__0_<0
& ~ f-F.3~r~-=-~ ~-~ ~ ~_~__~_;;:__F,"_~I r:.. :c~ ~.rr-ffl ~
"
'----""
Z
-i
fT1
'"
fT1
00
-i
"
a
'"
~
uJ
uJ
(.J
Ul
f'
'"
~
00
~
Z
n
r
c
t:I
fT1
t:I
~
Z
~
uJ
uJ
...
~
Z
-i
fT1
'"
fT1
00
'. / -i
'-
, "
"--"
I;-!:'" ';
I
:~~~~,~~~;:~:~~t~~~~~~~~'~:t~tJ
- ..-
z
C
-i
fT1
fJ)
"T~'T' .
rn "
~ 8 ~
f! b
m
6
~.
:>
uJ N...... t ~
'" ...,0 t" uJ
0 00 ~ uJ
bg ...
()l
0' r f,
uJ ...'" ~
f\i '-J'" uJ
f' 1l>0' uJ
pg Ul
~ ...
uJ I.:
L~
uJ :.. ~
OJ 10 OJ::
f' [: t OJ::
0'
~
uJ t
uJ :;;1
ro
f' t" 0 0' uJ
, . t" '"
~ r ~J
uJ ~ ... [
I
uJ l~ ~
rv ~ uJ
f' (DO' uJ
, . . ()l
~ ..0 r
uJ r~
... L~ I
-i
0' 0
0' b) (0.) ..
;-I (DuJ !l>
. . i ~
0' rt In
~
I I
I i
~ (~ r: ~ :. ,-, ~ r;;, ': ":' .. .
a.t:
-10HU11J
DC: fTi::O
rz lGC'
-i 00<
D Dm
00 OJ3
(f) rm
fT1 fT1Z
00 -i
00 C
m Z
t:I ~
-i
D
3
o
C
Z
-i
I
W(.)(.) ~
~'"uJ1 ~
W (",t.J III
l'll'lf.:--~
~~~OD
~~ Oz
I-.Ll
~:,., (;_ ~'.i~=~__?,-"'''- '---
I
:c t.J:l r 1:'
t:Iro~
t:Ib-iZ
n
illr ;r, ()l ~
o r!}
...
o ,
~! ~
~I
i
I
!
'"
o
W
~
00'0
fT1'"
'00
-i'-<
fT1
r,)\J
",-i
uJ
.- (.J
uJl
uJ~
(.Jl..O
.~
:-1 ,,, ~~y
._""'--~-_._- -~- -~~-
~ ~l~_g__: _~__~..~ ~__:_ el ~ ~__t,
~.:..
~ ~ ~ ~
~w~w'-l.l
l!I ,. t..I ~, _ "
r-VI~;- (i' f "
'\
\..J
z
o
-;
flj
m
:--
~
Z
-;
flj
:u
rn
m
-;
'T]
0 <.1l
:u .....
~ ?
<.1l 0>
<.1l cr>
(oj
""
~ <.1l
foj
..... ~
<.1l
~
Ul
~
Z <.1l
n ro
r ~
c
t:1 ~
fTl <.1l
t:1
~
Z
<.1l
~ co
<.1l ~
<.1l
... ~
<.1l
~
J z
-;
fTl
:u <.1l
fTl rl)
I Ul ~
''-..-/1 -;
~
! <.1l
....
cr>
tn
;-'
cr>
"
, "
'--'-/
;:1., );1
I
oJ '-~tf:"':~l.~'~'~~,!l':~"~~~-~t..~~-:~i.
"-~""
" ,- ','
,1:1
'I
t!J ~
~ n
ai
'-
"'0
CO~
I
,
("
~<.1l
tl)l....
CD<iJ
~~
1''''
j
I
I
I
"
T
~
..
"
n
III
I
:;u
III
3
I"
~,
r:5
~'
6 ""
loJ
'0..... lD
l,)
00 <.1l
~~ ~
..., ro I'"'
!'J
~ "'-J t.,)
~&; ~
,. ~
~ g r"
I f)
~~ ~
t-J -..,J ~'J
~. ,
[~ t,
~ ~
t' 0 tn
. .
(oj toJ
I"'" r
I 0> ~
.f:-...J .....,
COtn tn
r'
., , .. , 2:; c 'r . x;: .. -;l;
i:L1i~li31 6~b:s!
-lOi-fln"':l, 00-:2/
::DClTifT1::o n
r ZI 0:0 P:::: (.J
-;Ito< !.I:-
n :0 m I
ill ~~ :u~~~?~
fTl fT1 Z fTll
m -1 l::! m
(fl C I.p.
fTl Z 01
tI """" D m
-I A ..t-
Ul'
...1
-; I
I,
~
<.1l
<.1l
...
D
:0<
o
C
Z
-i
o
o
(oj
ro
<.1l
<iJ
'"
~
<.1l
<iJ
cr>
(oJ (o.Jt., ~
:0:010 ~
W(o.Jt.J fT1
tJ)tJ)I..D......::o
~~~d5
.p..J:-~O_
I Z
I
,
UllJ
fTl:u
lJo
-it..,
mt1
...... -i
<.1l
"""'" (.J
<.1l1
<iJ~
(oj <.1l
~
<.1l
<.1l
.....
<.1l
<iJ
0>
-i,
01
,. !
..
-
In
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
" '\
; )
'---
MOTION by Councilmember
RES. NO.
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 93-19
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 21 ,
1993 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 93-19; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 19th day of October, 1993 , in the
City Hall at 7:45 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
, \the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
'~given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmember
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmember
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
\
, ,
'-JATTEST:
J. E. MCKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\-....
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 5, 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
Admin.
BY:
Accept Easement/Commercial
Boulevard
v. Volk ~,~.
ClI.
The City Council is requested to accept the attached easement
from Kottke Bus for Commercial Boulevard.
V:Attach.
,~ ) MOTION BY:
TO:
SECOND BY:
~-)
\
, )
~
,~J
",i
I ~ ~
, I
Vi
QI
0;:} 1
,I
'Y
~
I
I'
~:
C'lI
. I
rt
rv\
'I
1
I
Form No. 9.M-WARRANTY OEED
Corporation or Partnership to
Corporll.tion or Partnership
Minnesota Uniform ConveYlnelnl Blinks (1978)
Millef.DRv,sCo" Minnl'R[101,,
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value (vffiled ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No,
(n-I'" ,19~
<;:~.. r,,\~ \I"C\~,,,-
County Auditor
by 00rJ('!,~~_
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ _ 59.40
Date:
June 1
,19 -.iL
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION Kottkes' Bus: Service, Inc.
, 8 cor~ration under the laws of
Minnesota .. Grantor, hereby conveys and w~ants to t e City of Andover I
. Grantee, a
. real property in
municipal corporation
Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Parcel 4, City of Andover Highway Right-of-::,Way Plat No. I, Anoka County,
Minnesota
Torrens Certificate of Title No. 56463
The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property.
lif more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the folJowing exceptions:
~ (Q-llo"l3 1l9cefp1' ..:2.S
Deed tar heIeon 01 S ~.ljO
IYiJ 100 00'000 01 S ~
'rr;, ~q\:V~"M;1 rp~~,.,..,
TOl< Admlnlsll'alo<,
paid
paid
DepuIy
, B:O?!~;~t3;~~
~t" --:; .-z;~-
BY~~~:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF 04'<' R'^-_
} ss.
The foregoing was ackno'Yiedged before me this
by ~~..<J_ 0 F. ../{,;:(Po""",
the ..><..1_jA..-p
of Kottkp'~1 Rlls Servir.:p. Inr.
under the laws of Minnpsnta
, NOTARIAL-STAMP"ORSEAL (oa"-OTHER-TITLE OR RANK)
/ dA/. day of QUH _ ,19-.2.L ,
and ~.-' tv, ~'~~~J
and 7/,,:;'R .a.,~_ -~/J'...-7~ /p~
I a r.orrnrrltinn
, on behalf of the r.nrpnratinn
~~_{?, (l~~
SIGNATU OF PERSON TAKlNG ACKNOWLEDGMENT
@ S~IRi.EY A, CLlNT~-;:l
_ NOTARY PUBliC - MINNESOTA .~
:L' ANOKA COUNTY
!,\,,~ '" eomm..... E...... oa.,~ ,...
Tu Statemente tor the r.al propert,. d'lCrtbed In thle INtrument Ihould
b. unt to (lnclud. name and addr..e of Graat")l
City of Andov~r
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS I>llAFTED BY (NAME AND AODRESS): 1
Burke and Hawkins, P.L.C.
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
______1
/' ~,
CITY OF ANDOVER
'-'
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t\O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM
t\O.
Admin.
BY:
Award Bid/Emerald Glen/
93-11
V. VOlk\,t.
e:l:l .
The bids for Project 93-11, Emerald Glen, were opened at 10:00
a.m., Friday, October 1, 1993.
The bid tabulation and resolution awarding the contract will be
provided at the meeting in order to give TKDA sufficient time to
go over the bids for any inaccuracies.
v
\
\...)
r- \ MOTION BY:
"- )
SECOND BY:
TO:
/ ~,
CITY OF ANDOVER
\.-/
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
t-O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Todd J. Haas,
Enginee<~
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Item
ITEM
t-O.
Partial Release of Woodland
Pond Plans & Specs Escrow
BY:
.,;13.
The city Council is requested to approve release of a total of
$2,850.00 plus interest of the $6,000.00 for Woodland pond. The
remaining $3,150.00 will be transferred to the development
contract (developer's improvements such as grading and street
lighting). In addition, $1,000.00 plus interest for the
feasibility report will be returned.
Total to be returned is $3,867.54.
Note:
The City has received the Letter of Credit for City
installed improvements, Project 93-14.
i
"-
"'-)
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
TO:
****************************************************************
~~************************************************************~*
~~ . **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: WHAT'S HAPPENING? ::
:: october 5,1993 ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ - Carl Bolander & Sons has indicated that the **
:: hauling of clay materials for the construction ::
:: of the cap on the landfill (WDE Site) will take ::
~~ at least three days of favorable weather. An **
:: additional 10 days of favorable weather will be ::
~~ needed to haul the topsoil to the site. staff **
:: has informed Bolander & Sons the City's disgust ::
~~ in how this matter has been handled and the poor **
:: communication on their part of informing the ::
:: City of the actions taken on the site. ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ .' **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~:************************************************************?:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"
..
.
:r
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 5, 1993
AGENDA
r-n
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Todd J. Haas,
Engineering
~
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
Non-Discussion Item
ITEM
r-n
Award Bid/93-11/Emerald Glen
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 93-11
for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain
construction in the area of Emerald Glen.
The 3 lowest bids were as follows:
1. Inland utility Construction
2. Annandale Contracting
3. Mille Lacs Contracting
$180,952.55
$181,145.59
$189,339.50
The awarding of the bid is contingent upon the following:
1. An executed development agreement and escrow requirement
received by the City.
2. Recorded final plat of Emerald Glen.
3. A revised grading/drainage/erosion control plan acceptable
to the City of Andover and Coon Creek watershed District.
Note: Bill Hawkins and I met with the City of Coon Rapids and
Jim stanton to negotiate the acquisition of the drainage
easement. Our research determined 133rd Avenue NW was not
eligible for state aid because the project had not been
reviewed and approved. Therefore, the City could not be
reimbursed for the construction. At this point the only
option appears to be to proceed with condemnation.
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
TO:
.
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 93-11 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
STREET AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF EMERALD GLEN
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 205-93, dated September 7, 1993 , bids
were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as
follows:
1. Inland Utility Construction
2. Annandale Contracting
3. Mille Lacs Contracting
$180,952.55
$181,145.59
$189,339.50
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
Inland utili ty Construction as bei.ng the apparent low bldder
contingent upon the following:
1. An executed development agreement and escrow requirement
received by the City.
2. Recorded final plat of Emerald Glen.
3. A revised grading/drainage/erosion control plan acceptable to
the City of Andover and Coon Creek Watershed District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Inland Utility Construction the
amount of $180,952.55 for construction of the improvements;
and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made
with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder
and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has
been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
meeting this 5th day of
City Council at a
October
regular
, 19~, with Councilmembers
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
Monday
Oct.ober. 1993
City of Andover
Meet.ing Calendar
Tuesday \1Iednesday Thursday
Friday
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
9:00 fire
Drill
8:00 Ellinent
DOllilin on
COllllercial C:30 Person-
Blvel. nel COllm.
7:30 City 7:00 fire 7:30 Park
Council ~t[l. Drill COllllission
10 11_ 12 13 14 15 16
9:00 fire
Drill
7:30 P 8. Z 7:00 fire
Columbus Day Iteetin[l Drill
17 18 19 2~:00 fire 21 22 23
Drill
6:30 Dev.
Task force
7:30 Tree 7:30 City 7:00 Fire 7:30 Park
COllmission Council I1t[l. Drill COllllission
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
7:00 f.Dept. 9:00 Safety
Bus HtQ. & Disaster
7:30 ,Junk Con. Itt[l.
7:30 P 8. Z Yard Task
Iteetin[l Force
31
Please call Vicki Volk at 755-5100 to update calendar.
Revised g-~?-Q::I
Andover
Fire Department Open House
Station 1 - 13875 Crosstown Boulevard
October 4, 1993
8:00 am to 4:00 pm
Station 2 - 16603 Valley Drive
October 8, 1993
6:30 pm to 8:30 pm
If anyone needs information on fire safety
or group tours of fire stations, please call
755-9825. Leave message for Joyce or Kevin.
October 5, 1993
DATE:
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Park and Recreation Minutes -September 9, 1993
Planning and zoning Minutes - September 14, 1993
City Council Minutes - September 21, 1993
Anoka County Sheriff Monthly Report (August)
Fire Dept Open House
City Hall Addition Plans
October 1993 Meeting Calendar
wittington Ridge Preliminary Plat
What's Happening
Schedule of Bills
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
!~r-
\'-
.--'~
~.
.
Office of
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF
QG 1O-5-Cl3
KENNETH G. WILKINSON
DECEIVED
325 Jackson Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303-221fbEP 24 1
612-323-5000 Fax 612-422-7503 v 993
CITY Ot- ANUOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER,
MONTHLY CO~~RACT PRODUCTIVITY, REPORT
MONTH:
August
, 1993
This report reflects the ~roductivity of the Andover contract carE,
3125, 3135,314::: and 31:.5. It ::ieeE. r:ot :.ncl"-.lde acti",,":.ti7 j:r~
Sheriff'.:: Department cars -..;i thin the City dcl:-ing non-con:ract
~~~rs, nor, activity b~. othe~ She=iff:s Departm~nt cars ~Jitilil: t~E
City du=ing contract hours.
ArreEts: ~raf:ic
DWI
58
5
R3.dio:allE
693
482
11
4
5
27
Co:npla:.nts
F.rrests: Felony
4
l-iedi:::als
G.H.
o
p, I. .;ccidents
N:..::deLeal1c,r 17
P.I'. Accidents
Pape:-s ;3erved;
2
o
36
88
[;omestics
A=rests: Wa=r~n~
House Checks 24
t~arnings :
3usiness Checks 445
Aids; Public
Other Agencies 74
TOTAL MILES PATROLlED:
9,147
CAPTAIK LEN CHRIST
ANOrA COUNTY SHE?-.IFF' S DEP.l\.RTHENT
PATROL JIVISION
-7-
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
ITEM 11
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANDOVER BOULEVARD NW
, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-24 SANITARY SEWER,
WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAIN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 319,381.63 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 113,903.76 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 433,285.39.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 249,628.39 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 93,874.18 .
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
ITEM 13
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND
STORM DRAIN, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-18 JAY STREET NW
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 111,645.98 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 42,772.37 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 154,418.35.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ , -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 154,418.35.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victor~a Volk - Citv Clerk
ITEM 15
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND
STORM DRAIN, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-29 ECHO WOODS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 243,247.83 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 195,662.51 and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 438,910.34.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 438,910.34.
2. Assessment shall be payable in semi-annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the 15th day in April 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October , 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
ITEM 16
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STORM SEWER TRUNK AND LATERAL
, FOR PROJECT NO. 89-18 SE PART OF WATT'S
GARDEN ACRES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, the work has previously been done and a a contract has
been entered into with the City of Coon Rapids for the construction of
the improvements so that the total cost of the improvement will be
$ 39,832.93.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 39,832.93.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1994, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 5th day of October, 1993
with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. MCKelvey - Mayor
Victorla Volk - City Clerk